PCR2004029RESOLUTION #P.C. 029-2004
APPROVAL OF A THREE (3) LOT LAND DIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE SW ¼ AND SE ¼ OF SECTION 21 AND NE ¼ OF SECTION
28
(TAX KEY NO. 2243.994.004 / Parker Drive)
WHEREAS, On February 19, 2004 a sketch was submitted by Darryl Uchitil for a
three (3) lot sketch land division of the property located in the SW ¼ and SE ¼ of
Section 21 and NE ¼ of Section 28, (Tax Key No. 2243.994.004), and
WHEREAS, The proposed land division would create two residential lots with an
average area of 311,874 square feet, and one outlot, and
WHEREAS, Said property is zoned A Agricultural District requiring minimum lot
size of 30,000 square feet and an average minimum width of 120 feet and EA
Exclusive Agricultural requiring minimum lot size of 35 Acres and an average
minimum width of 1,275 feet, and parcels meet said minimum zoning
requirements, and
WHEREAS, The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area as being set aside
for rural density residential development and this proposal is within this goal, and
WHEREAS, Only approximately 60 feet of frontage is depicted per parcel at the
base setback line, and
WHEREAS, Outlot 3 is intended to be adjoined to the existing DNR lands to the
south for future DNR Conservancy,
WHEREAS, Said parcels will be serviced by private sewer and water facilities.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approve of a sketch
land division being submitted creating a three (3) lot land division of the property
in the SW ¼ and SE ¼ of Section 21 and NE ¼ of Section 28, (Tax Key No.
2243.994.004).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the petitioner continues to bring Outlot 3
under the control of the DNR for DNR Conservancy lands and that those
proceedings are made aware to City Staff on a monthly basis.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the average widths at the base setback line
of less than the required 80 feet are allowed in order to keep in line with the
integrity of the rural density that is proposed in the 2010 Land Use Plan for this
area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the final CSM should address that any
future land division for these lands shall require the platting of right-of-way for
access purposes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That this approval is granted in concept only and
final action is only an indication of the current intent of the Plan Commission;
Final submittals are subject to future review and consideration by the Plan
Commission, municipal committees of jurisdiction, and other agencies, and
approval of final plans is not guaranteed by this action of the Plan Commission.
Plan Commission
City of Muskego
Adopted: March 16, 2004
Defeated:
Deferred:
Introduced: March 16, 2004
ATTEST: Sandi Asti, Recording Secretary