Loading...
PCR2002069RESOLUTION #P.C. 069-2002 RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF LEGAL LOT STATUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING PETITIONER TO DIVIDE A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING VACANT LOT FROM AN ADJOINING LEGAL NON-CONFORMING LOT AT W184 S6668 JEWEL CREST DRIVE (TAX KEY NO. 2174.143) WHEREAS, On May 7, 2002 a petition for legal lot status was submitted by Roy Smart for a lot adjacent to W184 56668 Jewel Crest Drive, and WHEREAS, The proposed legal lot designation would deem buildable a parcel of land having 50 feet of average lot width, a total size of approximately 8,100 square feet, and WHEREAS, Said property is zoned RS-310LS Suburban Residence with a Lakeshore Overlay District, requiring a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and an average minimum width of 67 feet, and said lot does not appear to meet said minimum zoning requirements, and WHEREAS, The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area as being set aside for medium density residential development and this proposal is consistent with the plan, and WHEREAS, City sewer service is available to the parcel, and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the criteria of Section 18.23, adjacent and surrounding properties are similar in would not have a negative effect on property values in the immediate area, and lot width and square footage, and use of said lot in conformance with RS-3 / OLS uses permitted by right WHEREAS, The Plan Commission determines that the property owner would incur a hardship if legal lot a status is not granted. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission recommends to the Common Council that ~~ ~ approval be granted for legal lot status in the Jewel Crest Subdivision citing that the subject lot is compatible to adjacent properties. has sufficient buildable area to accommodate a residence and has City sewer available, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission recommends to the Common Council that a new Certified Survey Map be provided to the City Plan Department within 90 days of Common Council's grant of Legal Lot Status, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission recommends to the Common Council that the petitioner shall be required to either record easements for all structural encroachments, or shall remove all structural encroachments in order to bring all structures into conformance with municipal setback and offset requirements. Plan Department City of Muskego Adopted: May 21,2002 Defeated Deferred: Introduced: May 21,2002 Attest: Sandi Asti. Recording Secretary ,Ld d' LLiL