PUM19970217• PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMITTEE - CITY OF MUSKEGO
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MONDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1997
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman
Sanders. Also present was Committee member Rasmussen, Utilities
Superintendent Kloskowski, and Rich Eberhardt (Ruekert &
Mielke). Committee member Salentine was excused.
The Committee noted that the meeting was posted on February 14,
1997 in accordance with the Open Meeting Law.
The Committee noted that a Closed Session would not take place.
Rich Eberhardt updated the Committee on the status of projects:
Boxhorn, Ryan & Groveway Sewer - Restoration items remain to be
taken care of.
Woods Road Sewer and Water and Racine Avenue -Pioneer Drive to
Muskego Regency - Lift station start up has been completed.
Sewer and water connections can be made.
HiView Acres Sewer - Advertisement for bids has been published.
Bid openings are scheduled for March 4 and March 5, 1997.
• Holz Drive Sewer - Advertisement for bids has been published.
Bid opening scheduled for March 11, 1997.
Waukesha County Park Sewer & Water - Last building will be
connected the week of February 28th.
Well #7 - Test well results have been received and are
favorable. Agreement with County on permanent well is close to
being signed by County. Ruekert & Mielke recommends specific
water testing be done at this time. Ald. Rasmussen moved to
recommend testing for iron, manganese, total dissolved solids,
and VOC scan for the test well at a cost of approximately
$200.00. Seconded by Ald. Sanders, motion carried 2-0.
Pumphouse for Well #7 - Bid date on hold until production well
is functioning.
Loomis Drive - Punchlist items to be completed.
North Cape Road Sewer - Restoration items to be completed.
Muskego Regency - Connections can now be made.
Candlewood - Nothing new to report.
Mystic Drive Sewer (Ludwig/Stram e) - New contractor has been
assigned project. Supt. Kloskowski suggested another
pre -construction meeting be held.
• PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMITTEE - PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 17, 1997
Deer Creek - Nothing new to report.
Champions Village - Nothing new to report.
EPI Lift Station/Forcemain/Leachate - Redesign to be completed
shortly.
Victorian Villas - Nothing new to report.
Park View Estates - Nothing new to report.
Lakewood Meadows Addn. #2 - Submittal package from developer's
engineer has not been received by Ruekert & Mielke.
Ald. Rasmussen moved to amend the REC allocation sheet to
reflect 1,047 REC's remaining to allocate as of January 1, 1997.
Seconded by Ald. Sanders, motion carried 2-0.
The Committee reviewed status of commercial sewer metering.
There are two schools remaining to meter. Metering should be
completed this summer.
There was nothing new to report on the Town of Norway sewer •
contract.
Ald. Sanders moved to defer action on the request for sewer
connection/Town of Norway for Don Pionek. Seconded by Ald.
Rasmussen, motion carried 2-0.
Ald. Rasmussen moved to defer action on the request for sewer
connections for the Muskego/Norway School District. Seconded by
Ald. Sanders, motion carried 2-0.
Supt. Kloskowski updated the Committee on the status of the MMSD
Facilities Plan. The Mayor, City Planner Matt Sadowski, and
Supt. Kloskowski met with representatives from MMSD recently to
discuss the Facilities Plan. Supt. Kloskowski noted that MMSD
did not have available the City of Muskego 208 Plan Amendment.
Consequently, numbers need to be recalculated.
The Committee reviewed REC allocation for Strasser's Carwash.
The Committee agreed to charge Strasser's Carwash the same as
Foat's Carwash. Option of possible payment plan was discussed,
and will be explored for next month's meeting.
Supt. Kloskowski updated the Committee on the status of the 208
Sewer Plan Amendment. Plan Amendment with updated numbers will
• be resubmitted to MMSD and SEWRPC shortly.
• PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMITTEE - PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 17, 1997
The Committee discussed acceptance of sewer improvements for
Lakeview Highlands -South. Ald. Rasmussen moved to accept sewer
system in Lakeview Highlands South. Seconded by Ald. Sanders,
motion carried 2-0.
The Committee reviewed Town of Norway 1996 Audit. Ald. Sanders
moved to approve payment in the amount of $32,732.88. Seconded
by Ald. Rasmussen, motion carried 2-0.
The Committee deferred action on a request for sewer extension
for Mary Lytle, as the property owner was not present. Ald.
Sanders moved to defer. Seconded by Ald. Rasmussen, motion
carried 2-0.
The Committee discussed training expenses for the utility
billing program. Ald. Rasmussen moved to approve payment of
extra expenses for utility billing training not to exceed
$1,130.00, with Joe Sommers being requested to make an attempt
to negotiate lower costs. Ald. Sanders seconded, motion carried
2-0.
Supt. Kloskowski reported that one of the forced well
• abandonments has problems wherein the property owner began to
abandon improperly.
The Committee reviewed proposed improvements to Well #5-Kristin
Down with Rich Eberhardt. Ald. Sanders moved to direct
engineers to solicit quotes for rehabilitation of Well #5 and
send quotes directly to the Finance Committee on February 25,
1997. Seconded by Ald. Rasmussen, motion carried 2-0.
Ald. Rasmussen questioned status of claim for damages in
Foxboro. Supt. Kloskowski has talked to property owner and
suggested that he contact the developer.
Ald. Rasmussen moved to adjourn at 8:08 p.m. Seconded by Ald.
Sanders, motion carried 2-0.
Respectfully submitted,
S Kllowski
Public Utilities
Superintendent
jz
• a �t �'�]uuI�i,ar���� e�
FCC D?SC< SSia" Fliy?CSES C�?LY.
CASE NUMBER ONE
(as noted in Engineer's Report and Preliminary Assessment Roll)
A. Non -Assessable Costs
1. 1998 Surface Paving
2. All Pump Station Costs
3. All Force Main Costs
4. Oversizing Costs (8" vs. 10")
5. Durham Drive Reconstruction
B. Used 50/50 unit/front foot cost split
C. Used as non -assessable frontage for rate computation:
1, City owned lot (undevelopable due to power line easement)
• 2. East side North Cape Road -residential frontage in City of Franklin.
3. Opposite Side Durham Drive:
a. 2210.998 (not served)
b. 2210.990.00 (served under a separate project)
Ul
Page 2
03/14/97 13-92083.210
RACLIENT113\1392083.200\REPORTWS DEER.DOC
•
FCR Df_1"UUS j0,N pUSpCSES Cp&y..
GATE:
CASE NUMBER TWO
Assumes A & C of Case No. One, but assess solely on front foot.
Frontage rate computation:
Estimated Main Assessable Costs $ 855,384.00
Estimated Total Frontage 13,369.71 L.F.
$855,384.00 / 13,369.71 L.F. = $63.979249/L.F.
Use $63.98/L.F.
Assessable Costs change by:
Now:
Immediate Frontage $ 650,963.87
Deferred Frontage 124.660.55
$ 775,624.42
Was: (Case No. One)
Immediate Frontage
$ 325,481.94
Immediate Unit
372,859.64
Deferred Frontage
72,576.27
Deferred Units
54.832.30
$ 821,914.50
Difference ($ 46,290.08)
(more non -assessable costs)
Page 3
03/14/97 13-92083.210
R:\CLIENTI 3\1392083.200\REPORTMS DEER.DOC
•
•
FvR F,ie.�w•,,
DATE:
CASE NUMBER THREE
Assumes A & C of Case No. One, but assesses solely at unit rate.
Unit Rate Computation:
Estimated Main Assessable Costs $ 855,384.00
Estimated Total Units 78 units
$855,384.00/78 units = $10,966.46154/Unit
Use $10,966.46/Unit
Assessable Costs Change by:
Now:
Immediate, 68 x $10,966.46 = $ 745,719.28
Deferred, 10 x $10,966.46 = 109,664.60
$ 855,383.88
Was: (Case No. One)
Immediate Frontage
$ 325,481.94
Immediate Unit
372,859.64
Deferred Frontage
72,576.27
Deferred Units
54,832.30
$ 821,914.50
Difference $ 33,469.38
(more assessable costs)
Page 4
03/14/97 13-92083.210
R:\CLIENT113\1392083.200\REPOR7RMS DEER.DOC
•
•
•
CASE NUMBER FOUR
Assumes all of Case Number One except:
A. Deletes
1. Bid Item 18 - 2 inch Force Main
2. Deletes Tax Key Numbers
a. 2210.998
b. 2210.993.001
C. 2210.994.001
e. 2210.995.001
B. Frontages
Immediate Assessable Frontage
Deferred Assessable Frontage
Non -Assessable Frontage
C. Units
Immediate 66 Units
Deferred 10 Units
TOTAL 76 Units
D. Assessable Main Costs
As bid (from Engineer's Report)
Less Bid Item 18
20% Administrative, Engineering & Contingencies
Estimated Assessable Main Costs
Page 5
9,874.49 L.F.
1,948.43 L.F.
751.51 L.F.
12,574.43 L.F.
$ 712,820.00
12.000.00
$ 700,820.00
140.164.00
4. 1 ':1 11
03/14/97 13-92083.210
RACLIENn 13\1392083.200\REP0R'R MS DEER.DOC
•
•
�J
E. Rates (50150)
1, Frontage
e
$840,894.00/2/12574.43L.F. = 33.440243/L.F
Use $33.44/Front Foot
2. Units
$840,984.00/2/76 units = 5532.789474/Unit
Use $5,532.79/Unit
F. Assessable Costs Change by
Now:
Immediate Frontage
Deferred Frontage
Immediate Units
Deferred Units
Estimated Assessable
Was: (Case No. One)
Immediate Frontage
Immediate Unit
Deferred Front
Deferred Units
Difference
(more non -assessable costs)
Less project costs
9874.49 x $33.44 =
1948.43 x $33.44 =
66 x $5,532.79 =
10 x $5,532.79 =
Net effect on non -assessable costs:
Less non -assessable costs
$ 330,202.95
65,155.50
365,164.14
55,327.90
$ 815,850.49
$ 325,481.94
372,859.64
72,576.27
54,832.30
$ 821,914.50
($ 6,064.01)
$ 14,400.00
$8,335.99
In this case, the City spends less, assessed less, but actually saves on
non -assessable costs.
Page 6
03/14/97 13-92083.210
R1CLIENIM 3\1392083.200\REPORT MS DEER.DOC
CASE NUMBER FIVE FOR D'�CUSSIOM
DATE: 11P,PpgFg O�JLY.
Assume Case No. 4, except:
A. Assess solely on Unit Cost
B. Unit Rate Computation
$ 840,984.00 / 76 Units = $11,065.57895/Unit
Use $11,065.58/Unit
C. Estimated Assessable Costs:
QMI T
Immediate Units
Deferred Units
66 x $11,065.58 =
10 x $11,065.58 =
• Estimated Assessable
Was (Case No. 1)
Difference (More Assessed Costs)
Less Project Costs
Total Reduction in Non -Assessable Costs
•
Page 7
03/14/97 13-92083.210
R:\CLIENnl3\1392083.200\REPORTNMS-DEER.DOC
$ 730,328.28
110,655.08
$ 840,984.08
821,914.50
19,069.58
14,400.00
$ 33,469.58
•
•
CASE NUMBER SIX
Assume Case No. 4, except:"— ^--
A. Assess solely on Front Foot
B. Front Foot Computation
Estimated Main Assessable Costs $840,984.00
Estimated Total Frontage 12,574.43 L.F.
$ 840,984.00 / 12,574.43/L.F = $66.880487/L.F.
Use $66.88/L.F.
C. Assessed Costs:
Immediate Frontage 9,874.49 x $66.88 = $ 660,405.89
Deferred Frontage 1,948.43 x $66.88 = 130,310.00
Lateral Assessed
Total Assessed
D. Non -Assessed:
Total Project
Assessed
Non -Assessed
Page 8
$ 790,716.89
72,576.27
$ 863,293.16
$ 1,734,313.20
- 863,293.16
$ 871,020.04
03/14/97 13-92083.210
R:\CLIENTI3\1392083.200\REPORTMS DEER.DOC
•
FC;ti S CUS ;L' ! pUirf :.ES 0�IL`..
CASE
NO.
BASIS
TOTAL 150'
LOT COSTS
ASSESSED
COSTS
NON -ASSESSED
COSTS
1
50/50
11,333.56
894,490.77
854,222.23
2.
Frontage Only
10,648.83
848,200.69
900,512.31
3.
Units Only
12,018.29
927,960.15
820,752.85
4.
50/50
11,600.62
888,426.76
845,886.44
5.
Unit Only
12,117.41
913,560.35
820,752.85
6.
Frontage Only
11,083.83
863,293.16
871,020.04
03/14/97 13-92083.210
R:\CLIENTI3\1392083.200\REPORTNMS DEER.DOC
Page 9
CITY OF MUSKEGO W182 58200 RACING AVENUE MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN 53150
---
MEMORANDUM
DATE: Jan. 10, 1997
TO: Public Utilities Committee
FROM: Jean Marenda by Renee Kowalik, Sewer Utility Clerk
RE: Marvin Strasser (Johnny's Car Wash) 2196.975
FOLLOW UP:
January 8, 1996 the Committee decided to wait for four quarters of
consumption history to determine RCA charges.
1st Qtr 1996 470,000 gallons
2nd Qtr 1996 390,000 gallons
3rd Qtr 1996 310,000 gallons
4th Qtr 1996 300,000 gallons
As per Foat Car Wash the REC's were determined by taking the highest
quarter reading and multiply by 4.
• 470,000 gallons
x 4 quarters
-----------------
1,880,000 divided by 75,810.5 (= 1REC) less 17% MMSD Factor for car washes.
Total REC's needed would be 20.75 @ $2,580.00 (1995 Rate connected 9/95)
Total to bill would be $53,535.00 for RCA's
How do you want me to bill for sewer usage? We bill Foat $2.65/1000 per
gallon less 17% plus connection fee.
cc: Mayor De Angelis
City Clerk, Jean Marenda
0
MEM07
• CITY OF 14USKEGO W182 S8200 RACINE AVENUE MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN--�53150
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: Jan. 10, 1997
TO: Public Utilities Committee
FROM: Jean Marenda by Renee Kowalik, Sewer Utility Clerk
RE: Egg Products #2165.978
1996 Usage Compared to 1995 Usage
Jan. -
March
1,092,831
Gallons
1,285,093
Gallons
April
- June
1,062,878
Gallons
1,320,794
Gallons
July -
Sept.
1,208,242
Gallons
1,468,468
Gallons
Oct. -
Dec.
1,014,475
Gallons
1,444,761
Gallons
TOTAL 4,378,426 (57.75 REC'S) TOTAL 5,519,116 (72.80 REC's)
The committee decided in May, 1996 to monitor usage thru November, 1996 and
• if Boldt Farms did not to exceed 60 REC's , they would not be required to
purchase additional REC's needed.
cc: Mayor De Angelis
city Clerk, Jean Marenda
MEM06
9•rnT
• 7c!., 1r•c,=
57.7�+
C 7. 7 5 T