PCM20060815
CITY OF MUSKEGO
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED
6:00 PM Tuesday August 15, 2006
Muskego City Hall, Muskego Room, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
Mayor Damaske called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m.
Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT
Mayor Damaske, Alderman Buckmaster, Commissioners Hulbert, Schaumberg, Stinebaugh,
Plan Director Muenkel and Recording Secretary Asti.
ABSENT
Commissioner Michalski
Recording Secretary Asti noted that the meeting was properly noticed on August 10, 2006
accordance with the Open Meeting Law.
MINUTES
Commissioner Schaumberg made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 18, 2006
meeting. Commissioner Stinebaugh seconded. Upon a voice vote, motion to approve the
minutes was adopted unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION
RESOLUTION #P.C. 071-2006 – Approval of a Building, Site, and Operation Plan and
Conditional Use Grant for a gas station convenience store located in the NE ¼ of Section 25
(Tax Key No. 2257.997 / W125 S9706 North Cape Road). This resolution was on the floor and
deferred. Plan Director Muenkel stated that staff reviewed the traffic study completed in 1999
and found that the recommendations meet those given today by Waukesha County and the
Engineering Department. The accident reports from the Muskego Police Department show one
accident since January, 2003 – present. Petitioner was requested to address traffic issues.
Petitioner has met with City Engineering Department, Waukesha County and the State. Major
improvements could be made to the entire intersection, however, that would not improve the
current turning lanes into Champions Drive. Recommendations such as right-of-way, restriping
of the turning lanes, more signage, and increased policing for speed would be some
alternatives. City Engineer McMullen submitted a recommendation letter that pavement
remarking, lane reconfiguration, new signage, and speed testing would be sufficient.
Commissioner Hulbert had a concern that if a convenience store would be approved, this would
be an attraction to children and a cross walk and don’t walk sign should be installed.
Pedestrian traffic needs to be accommodated. He has a concern with this and feels it should
be addressed.
Mr. Steve Nikolas from Zabest Commercial Group addressed the Commission stating that they
have exhausted all efforts with the County. They have met with City staff and the best
recommendations given were to install a right turn lane for the north bound traffic; right turn
lane for the south bound traffic and install a pedestrian path. No other solutions have been
provided. Petitioner is willing to accommodate the suggestions.
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
Commissioner Stinebaugh commented that he drove to this intersection and did his own traffic
study and found this to be an inherently treacherous area. He believes a good faith effort has
been made so far however, the geometries are an issue and he is not sure how to mitigate.
He does not like this, it is just a bad idea.
Alderman Buckmaster wanted to define that a rezoning decision is comprehensive and when
you make a decision on a Conditional Use it is more localized. There just is not the support for
this use based on comments and petitions he has received. He does not believe this is an
appropriate use for this area at this time. Alderman Buckmaster requested special privilege of
the floor for Alderman Madden.
Alderman Madden commended Commissioner Stinebaugh for taking the time to visit this area
and see first hand that there are serious traffic issues. She wanted the Commission to
consider the signed petition with one hundred and sixty signatures sincerely opposed to this
development. There are a lot of great uses for that corner, however she does not feel that a
car wash and gas station is the answer. Commissioner Schaumberg agreed that this is a
hazardous area and this use is not appropriate. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution #P.C. 071-
2006 was DENIED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 083-2006 – Approval of an amended Building, Site, and Operation Plan
for the Willow Pond Apartments located in the SW ¼ of Section 9 (Tax Key Nos. 2195.981.002,
2195.981.004, & 2195.981.006). This resolution was on the floor and deferred. Plan
Commission deferred this item requesting petitioner to be present at this meeting to clarify
submittals. Petitioner originally proposed a six stall structure that would be conforming and
then submitted plans for a twelve stall non-conforming structure. Plan Director Muenkel stated
that prior to the start of this meeting, petitioner handed him notice to request approval of their
original proposal for the six stall structure. Alderman Buckmaster made a motion to amend
the resolution as shown by Staff in the bold print. Commissioner Stinebaugh seconded.
Upon a voice vote, Resolution #P.C. 083-2006 was Amended unanimously. Upon a roll call
vote, AMENDED Resolution #P.C. 083-2006 was ADOPTED unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS SCHEDULED FOR DEFERRAL
RESOLUTION #P.C. 014-2006 – Approval of a Conceptual Subdivision Plat for the DeBack
Property to be known as Crystal Lake Addition #1 located in the SE ¼ of Section 32 (Tax Key
No. 2287.999). This resolution was on the floor and deferred. Alderman Buckmaster made a
motion to Defer. Commissioner Hulbert seconded. Upon a voice vote, Resolution #P.C. 014-
2006 was DEFERRED unanimously.
CONSENT BUSINESS
Commissioner Schaumberg made a motion to Adopt Resolutions #P.C. 104-2006, #P.C. 105-
2006, #P.C. 109-2006 and #P.C. 110-2006 engross. Commissioner Stinebaugh seconded.
Upon a voice vote, the motion passed unanimously.
PAGE 2
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
RESOLUTION #P.C. 104-2006 - Approval of an annual review for Schaefer Snowplowing
and Grading LLC located in the NW ¼ of Section 29 (W195 S9775 Racine Avenue / Tax Key
No. 2274.998). This resolution was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 105-2006 - Approval of a an extraterritorial Preliminary Plat for
Creekside Estates located in the SW ¼ of Section 34 and SE ¼ of Section 33 in the Town of
Vernon. This resolution was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 109-2006 – Approval of a Building, Site, and Operation Plan for Great
Lakes Recovery located in the SE ¼ and NE ¼ of Section 25 (Tax Key No. 2257.973.001).
This resolution was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 110-2006 – Approval of a Mother In-Law Unit located in the SE ¼ of
Section 32 (Tax Key No. 2287.015 / W200 S10821 East Shore Drive). This resolution was
ADOPTED unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION
RESOLUTION #P.C. 069-2006 – Approval of an amended Building, Site, and Operation Plan
and Conditional Use Grant for mini storage at the R.D. Meyer and Associates, Inc. property
located in the NE ¼ of Section 2 (Tax Key No. 2165.998.012 / W145 S6550 Tess Corners
Drive). Commissioner Stinebaugh made a motion to approve. Commissioner Schaumberg
seconded. Petitioner proposing to construct mini storage structures. A Public Hearing was held
on May 16, 2006. No comments were received. The item has been held due to petitioner
working out details on the site plan. There is an existing building towards the front of the
property and the mini storage units would be placed to the rear of the property. The existing
building has a three foot band of cinder block painted light blue and the upper portion of the
façade is a light gray metal. The mini storage buildings show similar materials. The western
elevations meet the intent of the Design Guides. The North, East and South exterior elevations
do not meet the recommendations of the Design Guides. There are no masonry products on
these elevations. The resolution states that the colors of the new buildings match the existing
building, and requires that all external sides of the building show at least a four foot band of
masonry. An annual review of the Conditional Use Grant is suggested.
Mr. Steve Meyer, petitioner, stated that the three sides of the buildings have limited views.
There is a corn field to the rear of the property and a tight lattice fence on the north side of the
property. He feels it is futile to put stone on the building, that this is an expense that is not
necessary.
Commissioner Hulbert feels that the masonry should be placed on the buildings per the Design
Guide. The petitioner does not own the corn field and that use can go away in the future.
Commissioner Schaumberg agreed with Commissioner Hulbert. Masonry should be placed on
the three sides of the structures. Alderman Buckmaster stated that the property is hard to see
and he would not be adverse to grant some relief for this area. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution
#P.C. 069-2006 was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 095-2006 –Approval of a Preliminary Plat for the Golf View Estates
Subdivision located in the SW ¼ of Section 24 (Tax Key Nos. 2255.979 and 2255.998 / Ryan
Road). Commissioner Hulbert made a motion to approve. Commissioner Stinebaugh
PAGE 3
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
seconded. Petitioners are proposing sixteen residential parcels and two outlots for stormwater
and wetland protection. The parcels meet the RSE/OWP zoning requirements. The major
changes required prior to Final Plat are: (1) A new wetland concurrence letter for the
delineated wetlands. The concurrence letter should state what setbacks the DNR recommends
from the
wetlands and those setbacks will be incorporated on the plat. (2) Sight distance specifications
for the proposed intersection Ryan Road needs to be delivered to the Plan Department. (3)
The complete setback lines for Lots 1 and 13 along with the width and depth of the building
footprint. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution #P.C. 095-2006 was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 103-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council to rezone property
from EA Exclusive Agricultural District and A Agricultural District to RS-1 Suburban Residence
District and a 2010 Comprehensive Plan Map from Agricultural and Open Space Uses to
Medium Density Residential Uses located in the SW ¼ of Section 26 (Tax Key Nos. 2263.998 &
2263.999 / Thode Drive). Alderman Buckmaster made a motion to approve. Commissioner
Schaumberg seconded. Petitioner proposing to rezone two parcels located off Thode Drive.
The parcel to the west is currently zoned EA Exclusive Agricultural and the parcel to the eat is
currently zoned A Agricultural. Petitioner requesting to be rezoned to RS-1 Suburban
Residence District. This proposal also includes a 2010 Plan Map amendment from Agricultural
and Open Space uses to medium density residential uses. A Public Hearing was held before
the Common Council on August 8, 2006. Eleven people spoke at the hearing with seven
against, two in favor and three for/against. The seven individuals against rezoning stated:
(1) The west side property is recognized by DNR and should be given to them if possible
for future preservation.
(2) There are enough subdivisions in Muskego.
(3) Spend time in this area and you won’t want to see it carved up.
(4) Concerns that more development opportunities will take place in this area.
(5) Don’t destroy what they have.
(6) Implications to traffic, school district, and environmental.
The two individuals who spoke in favor:
(1) Would like three acre lots but the developer’s are giving the people a great financial
deal.
(2) If you own it, you control it and they should be allowed to proceed.
(3) Sewer/water hookup is great benefit for surrounding owners.
The three for/against individuals wanted the City to keep it rural if possible, but keep it rural in
perpetuity. The developer is offering free sewer/water hookups to surrounding neighbors. The
residents are afraid that if the property is developed in twenty years they will be liable for the
sewer/water hookup bill.
Plan Director Muenkel stated that the resolution was worded for both approval and disapproval.
An amendment will be required with the final Plan Commission decision. Director Muenkel also
noted that recently the Aldermen acted on the Comprehensive Plan in this area and found that
the land should remain as Agricultural and Open Lands consistent with current zoning. Plan
Commission recommended the same to Council at that time.
Mr. Andrew Bruce, from MLG Commercial, spoke to the Commission that they held
neighborhood meetings to address concerns from the residents. They listened to their
concerns regarding having less development and changed their conceptual plan from RS-2 to
RS-1 zoning, going from 106 lots to 82 lots. The reduction in density would reduce the traffic
PAGE 4
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
on Thode Drive. MLG also proposed to widen Thode Drive to Highway 36. They would be
pleased to dedicate the wetlands to the DNR. The land use plan being considered tonight is
different from the original conceptual plan proposed.
Alderman Buckmaster noted that the Aldermen looked at four areas of the City and have acted
on three of them. The Comprehensive Plan calls for RCE density in this area and he does not
believe that the Common Council will accept the proposed rezoning. Commissioner Stinebaugh
agrees with the Aldermen. He stated that before MLG made the gracious offer for the
sewer/water hookup, most of the residents would have been totally against this proposal. The
sewer proposal has created a dilemma, however, he agrees with the Aldermen that this
rezoning should not be approved. Commissioner Hulbert concurred that going from EA to RS-1
to too big of a jump. He is happy that the Common Council will back the Comprehensive Plan
and not allow this density. Alderman Buckmaster requested to have the resolution worded in
the affirmative so as to have no misunderstanding on the recommendation to Council.
Alderman Buckmaster made a motion to amend Resolution #P.C. 103-2006 in the
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission recommends approval to the
Common Council…… Commissioner Hulbert seconded. Upon a voice vote, Resolution #P.C.
103-2006 was Amended unanimously. Upon a roll call vote, AMENDED Resolution #P.C. 103-
2006 was DENIED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 101-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council to rezone property
from I-2 General Industrial District to RS-1 Suburban Residence District (Tax Key Numbers
2230.999, part of 2230.995, & 2229.989), I-2 General Industrial District to RS-1/OWP Suburban
Residence District with a Wellhead Protection Overlay District (Tax Key Numbers
2230.999.001, 2230.999.002, & a small portion of 2229.997), RS-1/OWP Suburban Residence
District with a Wellhead Protection Overlay District to RS-2/OPD/OWP Suburban Residence
District with a Planned Development Overlay District with a Wellhead Protection Overlay District
(Tax Key Numbers 2229.998, a portion of 2229.997, 2229.995, 2229.996, & 2229.995.001),
and a 2010 Comprehensive Plan Map from Landfill and Extractive Uses to Medium Density
Residential Uses (Tax Key Numbers 2230.995, part of 2229.989, 2230.999.001, 2230.999.002
& 2230.999) located in the NW and NE ¼ of Section 18. Commissioner Schaumberg made a
motion to approve. Commissioner Stinebaugh seconded. Petitioner requesting rezoning on
parcels having multiple zoning districts. This proposal also includes a 2010 Plan Map
amendment from Landfill and Extractive Uses to Medium Density Residential Uses for the
western portion of the site. Petitioner has submitted a narrative and preliminary plat of future
intentions with this rezoning. A Public Hearing before the Common Council was held on August
8, 2006. Alderman Melcher spoke against the rezoning due to responses he received from his
constituents:
(1) General feeling is to leave current zoning in place as Industrial uses due to proximity
to other industrial uses.
(2) People thought it would increase services and taxes.
(3) People thought it would make an excellent industrial area.
(4) Development would destroy too many trees.
(5) Would increase traffic
(6) There are other areas in Muskego more suitable for residential development.
Twelve people spoke at the hearing, all were against the rezoning:
(1) Leave zoning as is.
(2) Every individual worried about future implications of living by a landfill.
(3) Worried abut increased traffic on Hillendale Drive and safety
PAGE 5
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
(4) Would like lots to stay RCE like the lots north of this area.
(5) Buffer is already existing around the landfill and should remain.
(6) This is not a safe area for residential to be next to a dump.
(7) The Horse Trails are no benefit to community.
(8) Has an incredible view, but should stay as currently zoned.
(9) Don’t expect or want neighbors next to a dump.
Plan Director Muenkel stated that the resolution was worded for both approval and disapproval.
An amendment will be required with the final Plan Commission decision. Staff is guided by the
adopted plans and currently this area in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan is set aside for Medium
Density residential along Hillendale Road and Landfill Extractive Uses along Crowbar.
Alderman Buckmaster requested special privilege of the floor for Alderman Melcher.
Alderman Melcher addressed the Commission and presented a petition with ninety-two
signatures against this rezoning. Alderman Melcher stated that there is a lot of history around
this site with homes being abandoned next to the waste site and dealing with the Payne &
Dolan asphalt operation. The residents feel this site is incompatible for residential
development. Although a development may add to the tax base, it would increase the need for
schools. This would be a drain on our natural resources adding to our police, public works, and
traffic flow in the area. The proposed trails would be wonderful except the responsibility would
be placed on the Park and Recreation Board. Another concern is liability. If anything happens
on site, the responsibility could be placed on the City. There is an estimated 215 cars added to
the traffic on an already taxing intersection. The surrounding areas all have larger lots in
keeping with the Country Estates Zoning District. Another concern is the resource of water in
this area. Wells have been abandoned, and would we have enough water in this area? There
is still methane gas coming out of the disposal site. Although it will be covered, the methane
gas will still come out for years to come. There is other land in Muskego that would be more
appropriate for a residential development.
Mr. Joe Niebler, President of NFI Muskego LLC, wished to correct statements that were made.
The site that is being proposed is not a dump. It is a site adjacent to the dump. The DNR
regulations provide for a 100 foot setback and they are going back 200 feet. There is no
methane gas being released into the atmosphere. The existing wells are pressure wells that
are used to adjust the pressure for the vacuum system that is underground to force the
methane gas into the incinerator that is located on the other side of the development. The wells
are not releasing anything and will be redone to be located below the surface. He stated that a
power plant was proposed for this area and the constituents adamantly opposed that proposal.
He looked at the area to the north that is all single family residential with no sewer and water
availability. This area has water and sewer availability and would be a lesser burden to the City
than an industrial site. When he came for conceptual approval, he requested RS-2 with an
overlay for the entire property. After hearing negative comments, he reduced the zoning to
RS-1. Mr. Niebler feels he has provided a contiguous use of the property and that this is a
tremendous avenue for the residents and an opportunity that should not be passed up.
Alderman Buckmaster wanted to clarify that the people were not against business or industry,
such as the power plant. They were against use and the electrical lines and the high cap wells.
As far as the highest and best use of this property, it is not a compromise, the citizens
determine typically if it is a significant change in the area.
PAGE 6
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
Commissioner Hulbert summarized comments from the Park Board. They would be interested
in a trail system that connects along Crowbar and connects to the main trails. Due to tight
budgets, high elevation, ADA accessibility, the benefits of the proposed trails would be for the
residents of this subdivision. The Park Board does not want to maintain this trail system with
maybe the exception of the trails leading down to the existing trail along Janesville Road. They
did have discussion that landfills can be used for multi-use for low impact. As a Plan
Commission he would like the zoning changed to reflect the RCE Zoning he is not in favor of
downsizing the zoning district. He would like to allow the Comprehensive Plan to play out.
There may be other industrial uses for this area.
Alderman Melcher addressed the Commission as a representative of the Conservation
Commission. At the Conservation Commission meeting this item was discussed and the
Commission was totally against the subdivision due to the mature trees that would be
destroyed. The Commission suggested petitioner go back and redesign the landscape plan
and submit to the Conservation Commission.
Alderman Buckmaster requested to have the resolution worded in the affirmative so as to have
no misunderstanding on the recommendation to Council. Alderman Buckmaster made a motion
to amend Resolution #P.C. 101-2006 in the THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan
Commission recommends approval to the Common Council…… Commissioner
Schaumberg seconded. Upon a voice vote, Resolution #P.C. 101-2006 was Amended
unanimously. Upon a roll call vote, AMENDED Resolution #P.C. 101-2006 was DENIED
unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 107-2006 - Approval of an amended Building, Site, and Operation Plan
for Inpro Corporation located in the NW ¼ of Section 16 (2221.015.002 / Apollo Drive).
Commissioner Schaumberg made a motion to approve. Commissioner Hulbert seconded.
Petitioner requesting approvals to install lights within the parking lot. Petitioner proposing to
install nine new twelve foot tall light poles on three foot high concrete bases totally fifteen feet
in height. All aspects of the proposal meet the General Design Guide with exception of the
three foot high concrete bases which should only six inches in height at grade. Petitioner
requesting that Plan Commission waive this requirement.
Mr. Steve Ziegler approached the Commission stating that part of the property will be donated
to the Chamber of Commerce. This will result in not only his employees using the parking lot
but other people and there is a need to protect the light poles.
Commissioner Stinebaugh questioned why in the past, Plan Commission granted Inpro relief for
landscaped islands and tighter parking stalls, why is this not consistent? Plan Director
Muenkel stated that due to the parking lot being used by employees only, this is a different
issue. Commissioner Stinebaugh made a motion to amend the resolution to remove the first
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the support bases can exceed the Design Guide
requirement of a maximum height of six(6) inches above finished grade. Alderman
Buckmaster seconded. Upon a voice vote, Resolution #P.C. 107-2006 was Amended with a 4-
1 vote. Commissioner Hulbert voting No. Upon a roll call vote, AMENDED Resolution #P.C.
107-2006 was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 108-2006 - Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan for the
Bohrer property located in the NE 1/4 of Section 3 (Tax Key No. 2169.986). Commissioner
Stinebaugh made a motion to approve. Commissioner Schaumberg seconded. Petitioner
PAGE 7
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
proposing to develop an existing single family residential property into a commercial use for a
coffee house, bakery and boutique. There is a principal structure along with miscellaneous
accessory structures on property. The proposed development will utilize the current single
family structure along with the existing structures. A paved access off College Avenue will
circle the entire property. There will be a defined access path to the existing walking path. A
photometric plan and lighting specifics are required to be submitted. Signage includes two
monument signs with one located on the western portion of site along Moorland Road and the
other sign will be along College Avenue. Both signs meet code requirements. Petitioner also
proposes a drive thru menu sign located south of the main structure along the drive thru lane.
The Plan Staff will review and approve the actual menu board prior to release of building
permits. A full landscape plan is required. The primary structure will be painted with extensive
decking and the accessory structures will be painted to match the primary building.
Tracy Bohrer, petitioner, addressed the Commission requesting permission to have outdoor
sales in the Fall of the year. She would like to sell pumpkins and corn stalks, in the Fall along
with Christmas wreaths and possibly Christmas trees. She also mentioned that she is thinking
of having a Harvest Festival Craft Fair. Discussion ensued that a one day event is allowable,
however, anything with vendors would require a submittal that must be brought forward to the
Plan Commission for approval. The consensus of the Commission was that this will be a
favorable use of the property and benefit to the City. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution #P.C.
108-2006 was ADOPTED unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 091-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council for various 2010
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments. Commissioner Schaumberg made a motion to
approve. Commissioner Stinebaugh seconded. Plan Direction Muenkel stated that Resolutions
#P.C. 091-2006 and #P.C. 092-2006 refer to the last two boundary areas of the
Comprehensive Plan. This is Boundary Area #1 in Alderman Schroeder’s district. Originally the
proposal was to change all the medium density residential uses along Woods Road to go to
rural density. After talking with the residents, it was decided to remain as medium density
residential except for the southwest portion around the High School where it will be low density
residential uses. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution #P.C. 091-2006 was ADOPTED
unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C. 092-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council for various 2010
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments. Alderman Buckmaster made a motion to approve.
Commissioner Hulbert seconded. This is Boundary Area #2 and originally proposed to go from
medium density residential to low density residential. It all remains as low density residential
except for properties surrounding Durham Drive which will remain as medium density
residential. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution #P.C. 092-2006 was ADOPTED unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE
No action intended for these items. The following will be placed on an agenda as a
resolution at a future meeting.
DOCKET #P.C. 068-2005 – Approval of a two lot Certified Survey Map for the Posbrig
property located in the SW ¼ of Section 24 (Tax Key Nos. 2240.997 and 2243.992.001 /
Parker Road).
PAGE 8
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
DOCKET #P.C. 061-2006 – Approval of a Certified Survey Map for the Village at Muskego
Lakes Partnership property located in the NE ¼ of Section 26 (Tax Key Nos. 2261.979.001/
Groveway Lane).
DOCKET #P.C. 062-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council to rezone land from
RCE/OPD Country Estate with a Planned Development Overlay District and A Agricultural
District to RSE Suburban Estate District and A Agricultural District for the Village at Muskego
lakes Partnership property located in the NE ¼ of Section 26 (Tax Key No. 2261.979.001/
Groveway Lane).
DOCKET #P.C. 088-2006 - Approval of a Certified Survey Map for the Zurawski property
located in the SW ¼ of Section 24 (S94 W13826 West Ryan Road / Tax Key No. 2255.983).
DOCKET #P.C. 089-2006 - Approval of a Certified Survey Map for the Herda property
located in the SW ¼ of Section 24 (S94 W13724 West Ryan Road / Tax Key No. 2255.982).
DOCKET #P.C. 098-2006 –Approval of a Preliminary Plat for the Fenwick Estates
Subdivision and recommendation to Common Council for a 2010 Comprehensive Plan Map
from Rural Density Residential to Medium Density Residential located in the SW ¼ of Section
31 (Tax Key Nos. 2283.999.002 and 2283.999.001 / Crowbar Drive).
DOCKET #P.C. 099-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council to rezone the May
property from RS-2 Suburban Residence District to RS-2/OPD Suburban Residence District
with a Planned Development Overlay District and a 2010 Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment from Low Density Residential to medium Density Residential located in the SW
and SE ¼ of Section 13 (Part of Tax Key No. 2211.998 / Durham Drive).
DOCKET #P.C. 100-2006 – Recommendation to Common Council for an OPD Amendment
to the approved RS-2 / OPD zoning (Suburban Residence District with Planned Development
Overlay District) currently in place for Woodland Creek Estates and Woodland Creek Estates
Addition #1 located in the NW ¼ of Section 21 and the NE ¼ of Section 20 (Tax Key Nos.
2242.994, 2237.993, & 2237.994 / Racine Avenue).
DOCKET #P.C. 102-2006 –Approval of a Preliminary Plat for the Stagecoach Trail
Subdivision located in the NW and NE ¼ of Section 18 (Tax Key Numbers 2230.999, part of
2230.995, 2229.989, 2230.999.001, 2230.999.002, 2229.998, 2229.995, 2229.996,
2229.995.001 2229.997, & part of 2187.998) / Crowbar and Hillendale Drive).
DOCKET #P.C. 106-2006 – Approval of an amended Building, Site, and Operation Plan for
the Jewel property located in the SE ¼ of Section 17 (Tax Key No. 2228.999.016 / S83
W19021 Saturn Drive).
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
Last Review of the New Zoning Code/Map. Plan Director Muenkel included Time Line for the
Zoning Recodification and Map Amendments. This will be sent to the Aldermen for their
review. A Public Hearing will be scheduled and it is the goal to have the majority of the Zoning
Code and Map to the Common Council by the first meeting in December, 2006 or possibly in
January, 2007.
PAGE 9
Plan Commission Minutes, continued
August 15, 2006
Commissioner Hulbert wanted to thank Plan Staff for putting up the sign notices around the City
indicating future zoning changes. Not everyone gets notified and this makes everyone aware
of possible changes that may happen.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Hulbert made a motion to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Stinebaugh
seconded. Upon a voice vote, motion carried. With no further business to come before the
Commission, the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandra S. Asti
Recording Secretary
PAGE 10