Loading...
FM20060425 CITY OF MUSKEGO Approved as Corrected FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES Audio Recording Available Tuesday, April 25, 2006 5:30 PM Muskego City Hall, Aldermen’s Room W182 S8200 Racine Ave. Mayor Damaske called the meeting to order at 5:32 PM. In attendance were Committee Members Ald Salentine, Ald. Madden, and Ald. Schroeder, City Administrator Sheiffer, Ald. Snead, Ald. Borgman, Ald. Melcher, Ald. Buckmaster, Finance Supervisor Mueller, Police Chief Johnson, Engineering/Building Director McMullen, Parks and Recreation Director Anderson, Planning Director Muenkel, Police Lt. LaTour, Park and Recreation Program Manger Dunn, Assistant Superintendent of Sewer and Water Utilities George Mayer, Recording Secretary Warhanek, and those per attached sheet. Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. The meeting was posted in accordance with the Open Meeting Law on April 21, 2006. REVIEW OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the April 11, 2006 Finance Committee Meeting were reviewed. Ald. Madden moved to approve the minutes. Seconded by Ald. Schroeder. Motion carried 3 - 0. LICENSE APPROVALS Recommend approval of Operator’s Licenses Ald. Schroeder moved to recommend approval of Operator’s License for Lisa Ybanez (interviewed by Mayor Damaske on April 13, 2006), Lori Terrill, Gary Terrill, Bernard Huber, Deni Grimslid, Candy Jentsch, subject to receipt of fees, favorable police report, and verification of schooling; and Crystal Kelly subject to three, six, nine, and twelve month reviews, receipt of fees, and verification of schooling. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Motion carried 3 – 0. Ald. Schroeder moved to recommend approval of Renewal Operator’s License for Jayce Redmer and Barbara Saladin subject to receipt of fees and favorable police report. Seconded by Ald. Salentine. Motion carried 3 – 0. Recommend approval of new agent for Pizza Hut – The new agent for Pizza Hut was not present. Ald. Salentine moved to defer to the Tuesday, May 9, 2006 Finance Committee Meeting. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Motion carried 3 – 0. PERIODIC LICENSE REVIEW Archery/Trap/Shooting Range at Schultz’s Gun Club – 9-month review – In a memorandum to the Finance Committee, Engineering/Building Inspection Director McMullen stated another three-month review was completed. Schultz’s Gun Club has met the requirements outlined in the original notice from his office. The Club is continuing to add material to the rifle range and the pistol ranges. The Club is beginning talks to adjust the positions of the rifle deck and pistol ranges; the City, prior to any construction taking place, must approve all of these amendments. At this time Engineering/Building Inspection Director McMullen is recommending that the Finance Committee continue to require the three-month reviews and direct staff to maintain periodic review during the three-month intervals. Ald. Schroeder moved to approve the continuation of three-month review with staff maintaining periodic reviews during the three-month interval. Seconded by Ald. Salentine. Motion carried 3 – 0. Six-month review – Operator’s License for Joshua Pelzek - In response to the Record Check Form submitted by the Clerk-Treasurer’s Office the Muskego Police Department reported no new violations. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Discussion and possible reconsideration of action on travel request to attend training conference – I.S. Director – Ald. Schroeder asked that this item be put back on the agenda. He stated this has nothing to do with Information Systems Director Sommers being the requester or his department being the requester. He stated in the past he has had an issue with the number of out-of-state conferences employees were attending, knowing they are more expensive then in-state or adjoining-state conferences. His biggest concern was two weeks prior to this an employee had come forth for tuition reimbursement above the Tuition Policy cap and at that time Finance took a firm stand that they were not going to move in that direction. The employee withdrew his request. Ald. Madden was hoping Information Systems Director Sommers would be Finance Committee Meeting April 25, 2006 - Page 2 Approved as corrected Continued – Discussion and possible reconsideration of action on travel request to attend training conference I.S. Director. able to attend Microsoft training conferences held in Wisconsin. Information Systems Director Sommers stated he has attended conferences held locally. They normally are a two or three hour somewhat technical and somewhat sales presentation. They are primarily for new technologies. He stated the Microsoft Tech Ed training is the best he is aware of. Information Systems Director Sommers stated he has been doing this training every other year. His second best option would be to take a weeklong class and that would be on one specific topic. He reviewed what he had learned at the Microsoft Tech Ed training conference two years ago, the procedure for their sessions, and their labs. Another type of training is being part of the state’s Governmental Information Processing Association of Wisconsin, which he is chairman. Ald. Madden asked what is the City’s return on the training? What is the City going to be able to eliminate from the current out- sourcing budget? Nothing was presented. The City is looking for something that can help cut costs. In regard to Ald. Schroeder’s question, Computer Specialist Quijano attended Microsoft’s Tech Ed training conference last year. Discussion took place on the knowledge gained at the training conference to learn and implement new products and upgrades. In regard to Ald. Madden’s question, Information Systems Director Sommers stated he has taken on-line training. The biggest problem with that is time. When should he do it? Ald. Schroeder stated the City, as a whole has to have some restraint when it comes to seminars, conferences, and schools. Personnel have to look closer to the City. Ald. Schroeder moved to reconsider action on travel request to attend training conference – I.S. Director. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Motion carried 3 – 0. Ald. Schroeder moved to deny request to attend training conference, I.S. Director. Seconded by Ald. Madden. It was noted hotel reservations were made which Information System Director Sommers stated he could cancel. $100.00 of the amount paid for conference registration is non-refundable. Ald. Melcher stated that nine percent of the total 2005 budget was for conferences (this includes all departments). If one department is going to be singled out, as an amendment, the whole of City Hall has to be looked at. He feels that Information Systems has been singled out, on a continuous base, for expenditures. It was noted that City Hall as a whole would be done as part of the budget process. Discussion continued on conference expenditures, budget amount, number of employees, and number of department heads. City Administrator Sheiffer clarified that it is a charge in her position description to approve/not approve conference and training requests that come forward. This is not the first one that has not been approved. This was brought forward because there was concern and City Administrator Sheiffer is trying to learn what the City’s philosophy is for this kind of spending. Motion carried 3 – 0. NEW BUSINESS Recommend approval of Initial Resolution Authorizing the Borrowing of $5,275,000.00 and providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2006 – Finance Supervisor Mueller introduced Paul Thompson and Dustin Avey from Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley & Co (HSE). They presented a proposal for an advance refunding of the 1997, $6,125,000.00 General Obligation Bonds and timetable on refunding 1997 bond. The proceeds from the new bonds, $5,275,000.00, are deposited into an escrow account until the call date. The proceeds, along with interest earned in the escrow account, pay the interest and principal due on the 1997 bonds at the call date, June 1, 2008. The refunding is recommended if the present value savings exceeds 3% (HSE standard) and/or meets specific policies set by the Common Council. The industry standard for present value savings is 2%. This refunding analysis currently provides a present value savings of $165,226.00 or 3.245%. If the savings decrease below a desired savings target or Common Council policy, HSE will continue to monitor market conditions. If at a later date market conditions improve and the savings target can be achieved, Finance Supervisor Mueller will be notified. The present value savings includes HSE’s expenses. HSE estimates all issuance expenses to be 1.4% of the par value. On previous debt issues the City of Muskego has paid issuance expenses of 1.7%. The 1.7% was on the actual 1997 issue (the issue the City did originally). Finance Supervisor Mueller noted that she did a comparison of two proposals, Ehlers & Associates and HSE. HSE fees were less. Fees are collected when refinancing occurs. If the Finance Committee and Common Council wish to proceed, a sale date would be set for May 23, 2006. Ald. Salentine moved to recommend initial resolution authorizing the borrowing of $5,275,000.00 and providing for the issuance and sale of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2006. Seconded by Ald. Madden. In regard to Ald. Schroeder’s question he was told the City does not have an exclusive contract with Ehlers & Associates. The City can receive bids in the future and decide to obtain the services of a company other than HSE. Motion carried 3 – 0. Finance Committee Meeting April 25, 2006 - Page 3 Approved as corrected Recommend approval of Rescue Bill Write-Offs – In a memorandum to the Finance Committee, Finance Department Supervisor Mueller is requesting the writing-off of rescue service bills listed with Waukesha County Collection Agency, $2,074.75; and Medicare/Medicaid accounts and Others, $31,331.01. Finance Department Supervisor Mueller stated the write-offs are two years or older; there are none from 2006. Ald. Schroeder moved to recommend approval of writing off $33,405.76 in uncollectible accounts. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Motion carried 3 – 0. Recommend disallowance of claim - Bishop – Clerk/Treasurer Janice Moyer forwarded letter received from Midwest Claims Service, the claim administrator for the League of Wisconsin Municipalities Mutual Insurance who provides the insurance coverage for the City of Muskego. Midwest Claims Service received notice of claim where Ms. Bishop alleged to have sustained damage to her vehicle while pulling out of her driveway. Ms. Bishop advised that while backing out of the driveway her vehicle struck the cover of the catch basin that is located near the property line. Midwest Claims Service has completed their investigation and has determined that there is no negligence on behalf of the City. The catch basin is not located on the driveway, but rather in the grassy portion of the yard. In order to strike this basin her vehicle must have been off of the driveway and on the grass at the time of the loss. Additionally, the City did not have prior notice of any defect concerning this catch basin. A municipality has no liability unless it knew, or should have known, of the existence of a defect and had a reasonable amount of time to repair it. In absence of negligence on the behalf of the City, Midwest Claims Service, Inc. will be unable to honor Ms. Bishop’s claim. Ms. Bishop (damage occurred to her daughter’s vehicle) met with the Committee. The Committee reviewed photographs of the location of the catch basin cover to the driveway. The catch basin has been there since Ms. Bishop built the home, 1993. Ms. Bishop is at the meeting tonight because after calling the Public Works Department, someone came to her home to look at the situation and then stated the City was responsible; the catch basin cover was improperly installed. The next day a work crew secured the catch basin cover. The Committee reviewed the quote for $1,075.64 to repair the vehicle damage. Ald. Salentine mentioned that the disallowance of claim would give Ms. Bishop six months to file small claim suit. Ald. Salentine moved to recommend disallowance of claim. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Ald. Schroeder stated the only other time the Committee would take action is if the insurance company sent no recommendation. Motion carried 3 – 0. Discuss new Performance Evaluation Form and Performance Incentive Program for Non-rep Group – City Administrator Sheiffer stated an Employee Evaluation and Performance Incentive Committee had been formed. Members of the committee were present: Parks and Recreation Director Anderson, Planning Director Muenkel, Police Lt. LaTour, Park and Recreation Program Manger Dunn, and Assistant Superintendent of Sewer and Water Utilities George Mayer. The Committee tonight was looking for the Finance Committee’s feed back. Park and Recreation Director Anderson stated the Performance Evaluation and Performance Incentive Committee was asked to: 1. Make an evaluation tool that was simpler, easier to understand, and doesn’t take an inordinate amount of time to evaluate an employee 2. Look at a more conservative approach in terms of real dollars, the committee had the capabilities of being creative in how they did that The Performance Evaluation and Performance Incentive Committee reviewed draft copy of The City of Muskego Annual Employee Performance Evaluation for Non-represented Employees and a draft copy of City of Muskego Non-Rep Evaluation Proposal – Estimated Cost Savings for the Year 2006 – 2010 Performance. The Committee benchmarked a lot of municipalities and received evaluation tools from public universities. The following rating scale guide was established: Unacceptable: Job performance fails to meet job requirements: performance clearly below minimum requirements. Immediate improvement required. Provisional: Job performance does not meet acceptable levels in all areas; performance must improve to meet expectations of position. Exhibits potential to become Effective with continued training. Effective: Job performance consistently meets standards for the position. This is the expected level of performance in a position with normal guidance and supervision. Outstanding: Job performance frequently exceeds standards set for the position and accomplishments are made in unexpected areas as well. Superior: Job performance consistently exceeds standards set for the position all of the time. The excellence of the employee’s work is clearly recognized by all. Part II Performance Factors were: Job Knowledge, Teamwork, Customer Satisfaction, Quality of Work, Adaptability, Personal qualities, Dependability, and Safe Work Habits. These were factors that every non- representative employee should be evaluated on. A comments section was provided. Finance Committee Meeting April 25, 2006 - Page 4 Approved as corrected Continued – Discuss new Performance Evaluation Form and Performance Incentive Program for Non-rep Group Part III Supervisory Factors (for supervisory employees) were: Leadership, Delegation, Planning and Organizing, Administration, and Personnel Management. A comments section was provided. It was noted that currently the rating scale has five areas that are on a number scale. Planning Director Muenkel explained how the number scale worked. Part IV Goals/Objectives/Special Assignments: This is where goals, objectives, projects, special assignments, etc. have been clearly established so that the non-represented employee and the evaluator were on the same page. These were rated: Accomplished or Satisfactory Progress, and Unsatisfactory Progress (See “Comments” Below). A section was provided for comments. Part V Overall Performance: The overall rating should be a reflection of the performance factors, supervisory factors (if applicable), and goals/objectives/special assignments (if established). This is rated on the Unacceptable to Superior scale described above. A section was provided for comments. Merit Pay Recommendation was reviewed. The committee looked at a management theory of midpoint or at/above midpoint. Currently 68% of the non-represented employees are at or above midpoint. The merit pay recommendation presented in relationship to Below Midpoint (B.M.), which consistent to how the non- representative employees are now set up is: Unacceptable 0%, Provisional 0% to 1%, Effective 1% to 2% percent, Outstanding 2% to 3%, and Superior 3% to 4%. At/Above (A.M.) midpoint is Unacceptable 0% percent, Provisional 0% to 1%, Effective 1% to 2%, Outstanding 2% to 2 ½%, and Superior 2 ½% to 3%, this is where the cost savings is. This represents an estimated cost savings of $21,536.00 the first year. The grand total savings through 2011 was $116,943.00. The committee looked at what employees’ value, money and time off. A recommended merit day’s incentive for B.M. is Unacceptable 0 days, Provisional 0 days, Effective 1 day, Outstanding 2 days, and Superior 3 days. A.M. recommendation is Unacceptable 0 days, Provisional 0 days, Effective 0 days, Outstanding 3 days, and Superior 4 days. Discussed was giving a Provisional rating a one-day incentive. Ald. Madden noted that she thought the committee was right because if the employee needed more training then you would not want to give the employee additional time off. Ald. Salentine agreed. Work Goals for the Year is an optional section to be determined by the immediate supervisor. Recommendations from the Employee Evaluation Committee: 1. No mid-year review but on the job coaching, final year-end review, 2. Cost of living adjustment (C.O.L.A.) is separate from the merit increase, 3. The C.O.L.A. should not be used to artificially lower the overall pay increase for any given year. This adjustment should be competitive with other represented groups, the Midwest and Milwaukee area CPI, and the employee cost trends for all salaries in the State of Wisconsin (Resolution #227-99); 4. The C.O.L.A. should be given whole and not broken up during the year, 5. This evaluation tool and performance incentive program should be presented to the non-rep employee group after Finance Committee, 6. For those individuals who are at the top of their salary range (red-lined), the City Administrator shall develop a process that has purpose and is valuable to the employee group and the Common Council to research/benchmark like positions and their salary ranges for the public/private sector. This process should have the support of Council and findings presented to the Council by City Administrator, 7. This evaluation tool should be computerized so supervisors can fill them out on the computer and not by hand, 8. A market study of all salary ranges should be done at a minimum of every five years or if a designated percent of salary ranges seem to be out of balance, 9. No longer paying out for the one floating holiday. You either use it or lose it just like the merit day program we are recommending as part of the performance incentive program, (this is an average savings of $5,000.00), 10. Any proposed changes to the evaluation tool or performance incentive program should come back to this employee committee for further review/research, 11. The following timeline (that remains) is recommended for approval of this evaluation tool and performance incentive program (this employee committee would like to make the presentations to the different groups); The Committee will have another meeting and invite City Administrator Sheiffer to discuss what they want to do with the department employees for the buy-in. April 26 – May 5 present to department employees for buy-in, May 12 Committee recommendations given to City Administrator for formal approval process. Ald Schroeder suggested it might be more advantages for the Evaluation Committee to have any recommended changes by Finance Committee and Common Council addressed before presenting to employees for buy-in. Brought up was having this discussed at a Committee of the Whole Meeting. It was also noted that this could be done at a Finance Committee meeting but all the Aldermen would have to be present. The Finance Committee thought the Evaluation Committee did an excellent job. Finance Committee Meeting April 25, 2006 - Page 5 Approved as corrected Approval of final payment – Loomis Rd. – The Finance Committee was presented a copy of the invoice from Wisconsin Department of Transportation for the Loomis Drive Jurisdictional Transfer. The invoice is for the City’s portion of the drainage work requested along the north side of the roadway and for the sanitary manhole adjustments necessary to complete the roadway paving. The Sewer Utility will be funding the manhole adjustments, $1,419.88. Engineering/Building Director McMullen stated the drainage portion, $5,000.00 will come from the Capital Improvement funds allocated for HWY 36. Ald. Schroeder moved to approve the invoice for the sewer manhole adjustments and the additional drainage work requested by the City. Seconded by Ald. Salentine. Motion carried 3 – 0. Recommend approval of continuation of School Liaison Positions – According to the Police School Liaison Agreement between the City of Muskego and the Muskego/Norway School District, both parties agreed to indicate by April 1, 2006 if they intend to extend the agreement to the 2006-2007 school year. Chief Johnson is requesting the City indicate it’s intent to continue the Police School Liaison Program. His recommendation for continuance of this program is based on the favorable findings on the program. The positions continue to be very well received by the students, parents, and staff of the school district. In addition, the patrol officers have been able to concentrate on other problems within the City as a result of the Liaison positions. Ald. Salentine moved to recommend approval of the continuation of the School Liaison Positions. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Motion carried 3 – 0. Recommend approval of Amendment to Chapter 9.23 – Disposal of Abandoned Property – The Police Department collects abandoned or unclaimed property in its property room. Other than a Police Department auction the disposal of property has been limited to basically two options: a public auction which is mostly limited to vehicles and the transfer of property to the Historical Society for sale of the items. After reviewing the disposal of the property it was determined that many of the vehicles are not accepted at public auction because they are in poor condition. The City receives no benefit from the transfer of property to the Historical Society. The Police Department’s auction is time consuming and expensive because the officers need to be compensated with overtime to work the auction. The Police Department has been looking at Property Room.com, which is an organization that handles items from police property rooms across the country. Property Room.com is an e-bay type auction where they pick up the property, put it on their auction site, and then dispose of the property by sale. Property Room.com retains fifty percent of the sale price for their pick-up and auction costs with fifty percent of the sales being given to the Police Department. Chief Johnson is requesting a change to Chapter 9.23 to add (h) Public sale through Internet based sales i.e. E- Bay or Property Room.com. The change will permit him to sign the agreement with Property Room.com so that the Police Department may utilize them for property that would otherwise have to be disposed of by destruction or salvage. Included with Chief Johnson’s memorandum was a copy of Chapter 9.23, Property Disposition Services Agreement, chart of how Property Room.com works, and a list of national law enforcement clients using Property Room.com. Ald. Salentine moved to recommend approval of Amendment to Chapter 9.23. Seconded by Ald. Schroeder. Ald. Salentine asked what happens if the property doesn’t sell on E-Bay. Ald. Schroeder stated they re-list the items, adding the item to other items. Motion carried 3 – 0. Action on request to expend approximately $4,200.00 for permanent speed bumps for Lions Park Drive – Engineering/Building Director McMullen stated attached to his memorandum was the Public Works Supplement for the meeting of April 17, 2006 and previous Public Works Committee minutes. The request to install speed bumps at various locations on Pasadena Drive is still at Public Works Committee. The Public Works Committee at the April 17, 2006 meeting moved to install permanent speed tables along Lion’s Park Drive with the consent of the residents and approval of the Finance Committee. The speed tables would be installed so the road could be plowed without any physical damage to the speed tables. The Public Works Committee directed staff to create a policy and criteria for the installation of these types of devices. The Public Works Committee is requesting that $4,200.00 be allocated to the installation of speed tables. Engineering/Building Director McMullen recommends the monies be taken from the Hwy 36/Muskego Dam Road Capital project. The City was successful in getting a grant from the DOT to cover the Hwy 36 project. The speed tables will be a permanent feature and will be constructed to achieve a minimum ten-year design life. Ald. Salentine stated she did get the four homeowners, where the placement of the speed tables will be, to sign off stating it is okay to install on the road by their house. Ald. Salentine stated she was considering deferring because of concerns of the Public Works Superintendent in regard to the bridge going in on Janesville Ct. and the installation of the speed tables not being easy. The concern is the speed tables would not get installed fast enough. Engineering/Building Director McMullen also spoke to the Public Works Superintendent. He stated that if this were approved tonight, he would contact Payne & Dolan tomorrow. Payne and Dolan would mill area out and have a patch crew come in. The day Payne and Dolan would Finance Committee Meeting April 25, 2006 - Page 6 Approved as corrected Continued – Action on request to expend approximately $4,200.00 for permanent speed bumps for Lions Park Drive install the permanent speed tables the temporary ones would be pulled out. In attendance at the meeting were people from Pasadena Drive. Ald. Schroeder stated in regard to the Pasadena speed bumps the City might want to step back and take it’s time on it. Beside the four homeowners buy-in, a neighborhood buy-in was also needed. Someone could walk around with a petition or the Public Works Department or McMullen’s office could send out correspondence to homeowners so they can agree or disagree in the privacy of their homes. Ald. Melcher presented a little history going back to October in regard to the speed bumps. People on Pasadena Drive asked for a speed study. Fifty-eight percent of the vehicles were above the posted speed limit. People then went door-to-door to see what the residents of Pasadena Drive felt about a speed bump. Seventy-six percent of the homes signed the petition for a speed bump. Residents are willing to pay for the speed bumps. Ald. Buckmaster stated that speed bumps for Pasadena Drive was not up for discussion – it is still at Public Works. Ald. Schroeder stated the item on the agenda tonight was for action on request to expend approximately $4,200.00 for permanent speed bumps for Lion’s Park Drive. Ald. Salentine moved to recommend approval to expend approximately $4,200.00 for permanent speed bumps for Lion’s Park Drive. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Ald. Schroeder stated his two concerns are: 1. He attended a two-day conference in Madison on round a bouts, tables, and bumps. The City of Madison started putting in asphalt tables and would not put another one in because of snow plowing issues. Madison has gone with concrete. 2. Using roadway improvement funds is an excellent idea put would like to defer for two weeks to give McMullen a chance to consult with Madison. McMullen stated he attended the same conference at a different time. Madison installed asphalt tables after the road was paved. He is confident the asphalt speed tables will last ten years. McMullen explained the asphalt installation process. Ald. Schroeder recommended training the plow drivers. The plowing has to be done at a very low speed. If not, there could be major damage to plow blade and roadway. Ald. Salentine withdrew her motion to recommend approval. Ald. Madden withdrew her second. Ald. Salentine moved to defer to the May 9, 2006 Finance Committee meeting. Seconded by Ald. Madden. Ald. Schroeder stated that if the City considers tables in the future the City must have a trial period with bumps, setting a trial period of one or two years with bumps. Tables are going to be quieter. A policy should be brought forward. Motion carried 3 – 0. Recommend approval of bid – 2006 ADA Accessibility, Parks – The City received the following bids for 2006 ADA Accessibility: Bidder Total Combined Base Bid Sunset Nursery $29,850.00 Gibralter Construction $26,980.00 $36,980.00 Plant Associates $69,496.00 Bluemel’s $38,400.00 J. Kasian and Sons $46,186.00 Ald Salentine moved to recommend approval of the Sunset Nursery bid of $29,850.00. Seconded by Ald Schroeder. This project was re-bid after the bid received last fall was rejected. Monies for the improvements are from CDBG Grant. Motion carried 3 – 0. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS - None RELEASE OF FUNDS - None REDUCTION IN LETTER OF CREDIT Recommend approval of reduction in Letter of Credit – Weatherwood Court Subdivision, $528,519.00 Engineering/Building Inspection Director McMullen is recommending a reduction in Letter of Credit for Weatherwood Court Subdivision. The reduction reflects work satisfactorily completed to date. Ald. Salentine moved to recommend approval of reduction in Letter of Credit for Weatherwood Court Subdivision in the amount of $528,519.00. Seconded by Ald. Schroeder. Motion carried 3 – 0. Finance Committee Meeting April 25, 2006 - Page 7 Approved as corrected VOUCHER APPROVAL Recommend approval of voucher report – The Finance Committee reviewed General Vouchers of $449,309.52, Utility Vouchers of $844,678.72, and Tax Vouchers of $547.67. Ald. Schroeder moved for approval of payment of Vouchers. Seconded by Ald. Salentine. In regard to voucher questions it was noted that Harenda Management Group reimbursement for professional services is the company used for mediation work for Park Arthur, Muskego Police Association reimbursement for petty cash should be Muskego Police Department, Wisconsin Be Smart Coaltition donation/Be Smart Scholarship is an annual donation from the EPI Land Fill Standing Committee, and Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik, Assoc is an Engineering consultant. Motion carried 3 – 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S - None FINANCE SUPERVISOR’S REPORT - None COMMUNICATIONS AND ANY OTHER BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW - None ADJOURNMENT – Being no further business to discuss, Ald. Madden moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:34 PM. Seconded by Ald. Salentine. Motion carried 3 - 0. Respectfully Submitted, Carolyn Warhanek Recording Secretary