Loading...
COMMON COUNCIL Agenda 20120710CITY OF MUSKEGO COMMON COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: JULY 10, 2012 TIME: 7:00 p.m. COMMON COUNCIL MEETING LOCATION: Muskego City Hall W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, Muskego, Wisconsin CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR’S OFFICE Aldermanic Representatives to Mayor’s Task Force on Communications and Standing Committees PUBLIC COMMENT City Residents and Taxpayers Only – Speakers will be limited to making comments related to all agenda items excluding closed session items relating to employment and labor issues. Comments will be limited to two minutes per speaker per agenda item. There will be no discussion by/with the Common Council during Public Comment. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ord. #1361 An Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan of the City of Muskego (Hewitt – RL-3 to DR-1). Second Reading. Need Plan Commission Recommendation Ord. #1362 An Ordinance to Amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Muskego. Second Reading. Need Plan Commission Recommendation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed under consent agenda will be approved in one motion without discussion unless any Council member requests that an item be removed for individual discussion. That item then can be acted on separately at the same meeting under the part of the meeting it would normally appear. Approval of Operators’ Licenses Approval of Common Council Minutes – June 26, 2012 Reso. #071-2012 Appointment of Alderman to Community Development Authority Reso. #072-2012 Appointment of Citizen Member to the Community Development Authority Reso. #073-2012 Approval of Certified Survey Map – Baseler REVIEW OF COMMITTEE REPORTS Finance Committee – May 22, 2012 FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES AND POSSIBLE SECOND READING IF RULES WAIVED Ord. #1363 An Ordinance to Repeal and Recreate Section 36.04(6) of the City of Muskego City Code Related to Wireless Public Safety Communications Common Council Agenda 2 July 10, 2012 VOUCHER APPROVAL Approval of General Vouchers Approval of Tax Checks Approval of Utility Vouchers Approval of Wire Transfers CITY OFFICIALS’ REPORTS COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW CLOSED SESSION Please take notice that following Communications and Miscellaneous Business as Authorized by Law, the Common Council will convene, upon passage of the proper motion, into closed session pursuant to: Wis. Stats. §19.85(1)(e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session, more specifically labor negotiations for 2012. Wis. Stats. §19.85(1)(g) Conferring with legal counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral or written advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect to litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved, more specifically discussion of Notice of Claim filed by Mike Moore against the City. Wis. Stats. §19.85(1)(e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session, more specifically Waste Management Proposed Wellhead Protection Agreement. Wis. Stats. §19.85(1)(g) Conferring with legal counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral or written advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect to litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved, more specifically recent developments regarding Parkland Venture, LLC vs. City of Muskego. Action may be taken in closed session. The Common Council will then reconvene into open session to continue with agenda items. OPEN SESSION ADJOURNMENT NOTICE It is possible that members of and possibly a quorum of members of other governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above-stated meeting to gather information; no action will be taken by any governmental body at the above -stated meeting other than the governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice. Also, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Muskego City Hall, 262-679-4100. COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF MUSKEGO ORDINANCE #1361 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO (Hewitt – RL-3 to DR-1) THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The following described property is hereby rezoned from RL-3 – Lakeshore Residence District to DR-1 – Downtown Revival District: Tax Key Number: 2195.999 SECTION 2: The Common Council does hereby amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Map to reflect a change from Medium Density Residential to Commercial. SECTION 3: The several sections of this ordinance are declared to be severable. If any section or portion thereof shall be declared by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unlawful, or unenforceable, such dec ision shall apply only to the specific section or portion thereof directly specified in the decision, and not affect the validity of all other provisions, sections, or portion thereof of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect. Any other ordinances whose terms are in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed as to those terms that conflict. SECTION 4: This ordinance is in full force and effect from and after passage and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012. CITY OF MUSKEGO __________________________________ Kathy Chiaverotti, Mayor First Reading: 06/26/2012 ATTEST: __________________________ Clerk-Treasurer Notice of Newly Enacted Ordinance Published: CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Council June 26, 2012 Meeting To: Common Council From: Jeff Muenkel, AICP Subject: Hewitt Rezoning Date: June 19, 2012 Background Information: The rezoning request is from Dan Hewitt who is the owner of the DJ’s Pub land along Janesville Road just north of Pioneer Drive. The rezoning request is to go from RL-3 Single Family Residential Lakeshore zoning district to DR-1 Downtown Revival District. The rezoning is requested as Mr. Hewitt’s DJ’s Pub/Restaurant and a home on the lot are being removed to make way for the County’s Phase 2 Janesville Road Reconstruction project starting next year. The Pub/ Restaurant has been operating at this location for about 90 years but for some reason or another has always been legal nonconforming as the zoning on the property has been residential. In order to rebuild a commercial restaurant a rezoning is required. Mr. Hewitt intends to rebuild a 3,000+ SF new pub/restaurant with possible apartment units on top close to Janesville Road. Thus, the best zoning district for such a use is the city’s rather new DR-1 Downtown Revival Zoning District. This zoning district allows buildings closer to the street frontage (as close as 10 feet) and was originally created for parcels along the downtown of Janesville Road that were affected by the project in some way. The DR-1 zoning district was recently approved for P&L Insurance just 300 feet west of DJ’s and the DR-1 zoning matches the same restrictions as the HC-1 Historic Crossroads zoning district which is found directly across the street from DJ’s and all along Pioneer Drive. The public hearing is before the Council tonight on June 26th and the Planning Commission will weigh in on their recommendation on Monday July 9th. The parcel is within the city’s Redevelopment District #2 boundary. Being that this parcel is within a Redevelopment District it is customary for the CDA to discuss how this proposal may relate to the goals of the Redevelopment District #2 Plan. The CDA reviewed the item at their June 19th meeting and found that the proposed rezoning makes sense as far as the Redevelopment Plan goals are concerned since the rezonings goal is to redevelopment Mr. Hewitt’s property similar to what is found today. Staff Recommendation: Overall, staff believes that this rezoning fits within what the Redevelopment District was created for. We have a current commercial use that has intent to be redeveloped via the rezoning. Thus staff does recommend approval. How the future building and site is proposed along with the future restaurant operations would be subject to future approvals of the Planning Commission. This rezoning can pave the way for a quality redevelopment that the city will have future say in. The redevelopment will hopefully increase the tax base of the parcel, the aesthetics of the roadway and entrance to the city’s downtown as well. Lastly, similar zoning is found adjacent to the parcel across the street and has been utilized a few other times along Janesville Road for those parcels affected by the County Reconstruction project. Council should weigh in at their discussion at the public hearing should they desire any more information so the petitioner has time to get that to Council prior to the July 10th meeting in which Council may make a final decision at that time. 8.14 RL‐3 EXISTING LAKESHORE RESIDENCE DISTRICT (1) STATEMENT OF INTENT This district is intended to apply to lakeshore properties with specialized regulations appropriate of their unique character; with particular recognition of the disproportionately high land value of lake frontage, the problems of over intensive exploitation of such frontage resulting from excessive demand, the extreme vulnerability of lakeshore properties to nuisance and to adverse effect on property value, and the problems of pollution and public safety resulting from over use. This district is newly created as a result of the zoning code modifications in 2006. Many parcels of this density and type existed when Muskego’s zoning code was originally implemented. The density, widths, and building location measures listed below are to guide parcels currently zoned this district. The City will not rezone new parcels to this zoning district or create new parcels of this size. All parcels proposing land divisions within this district must meet the minimum guidelines of the RS-3 zoning district or a residential district with greater regulations. (2) BASIC REGULATIONS (See Section 5 for general enabling and qualifying language.) (A.) Lot Size (B.) Density (C.) Building Location (D.) Building Size (E.) Open Space (F.) Height Minimum Area (In Sq. Ft. Or Acres) Min. Average Width (In Feet) Residential Lot Area Per D/U Min. Set Back (In Feet) Minimum Offset Minimum Residential Floor Area (In Sq. Ft.) Floor Area Ratio Min per Residentia l D/U Max. Permitted (In Feet) Lot Area Per D/U (In Sq. Ft.) One Side (In Feet) All other sides (In Feet) Single Family Multi per D/U Principal structure Accessory structure 1st floor Total 10,000 Sq.Ft. 66.6 * 25 6.7 10 1200 1200 - Exempt 6,666 30 ** * New land divisions in this zoning district must follow the RS-3 zoning district regulations ** See Section 5 (3) Permitted Uses (See Section 5) A. PERMITTED USES BY RIGHT 1. Any use as permitted by right in the RCE District. 2. Public outdoor recreational facilities subject to approval by the Plan Commission of building, site and operational plans. B. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 1. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District. 2. Any other use normally incident or accessory to the permitted uses subject to approval by the Plan Commission of building, site and operational plans. 3. One (1) boat house in addition to the accessory uses permitted by the underlying district, and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, or designee, upon payment of fees and receipt of permits as required and amended from time to time, and subject to following: a. Location: minimum 20 feet from the ordinary high water mark and subject to the side yard offset provisions of the underlying district effective with new construction or relocations after November 15, 2001. b. Height: not greater than 15 feet above the lowest grade. c. Area: no greater than 525 square feet. C. PERMITTED USES BY CONDITIONAL GRANT 1. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District. 2. Boating and yacht clubs, marinas and launching sites. 3. Private commercial and private non-commercial group outdoor recreational facilities. 4. Lake resorts and individual cabins or cottages for rental on a limited seasonal basis and not for year round occupancy. 5. Boat liveries. D. SINGLE USE 1. No lot in this district shall by deed, covenant, easement or other device or agreement hereafter provide for the permitted uses or accession or incidental uses thereto, or for right of access, by other than the owner or legally resident occupant of the premises and invited guests, except in the case of a public park or way, public utility easement, patrons of a permitted commercial use, or of a permitted organizational use. E. LAKE SHORE OFFSET 1. No building shall be permitted closer than 50 feet to the shore line of a lake shore lot except that no offset shall be required for piers or similar use areas and a boat house as permitted above. F. REZONING AND LAND DIVISION RESTRICTIONS 1. The City will not rezone new areas to this zoning district as the district is in place for the conformity of existing parcels that were developed under the original City of Muskego Zoning Code. All parcels proposing land divisions within this district must meet the minimum guidelines of the RS-3 zoning district or a residential district with greater regulations. 8.38 DR‐1 DOWNTOWN REVIVAL DISTRICT (1) STATEMENT OF INTENT This District is intended for the properties found along Janesville Road in Muskego’s Downtown from Bay Lane Drive to Racine Avenue. The District was created to allow the revival and redevelopment of these properties in order to create new opportunities for the parcel owners. The parcels in this area have or may be affected by future improvements along Janesville Road and it is the City of Muskego’s objective to have a zoning district that allows property owners to have usability of their property in order to assure that the core of Muskego’s downtown is revived. This District is intended to encourage mixed-use, compact development that is sensitive to the environmental characteristics of the land and facilitates the efficient use of services. The District diversifies and integrates land uses within close proximity to each other, and it provides for the daily retail and customer service needs of the residents. The District is designed to encourage pedestrian-friendly designs, which respect and accommodate the community’s dependency on the automobile. Higher standards of design with a renewed emphasis on community image and the cost-effective provision of public services are promoted. Widely accepted development and planning principles suggest that new development should help the downtown and City compete in an increasingly competitive and quality-conscious real estate environment, and provide alternative housing and shopping opportunities in close proximity. Design standards should closely follow those found in the City’s adopted Downtown Design Guide. The Downtown Design Guide is characterized by the following design elements: Traditional town center/modern ‘main-street’; Buildings squarely facing the street; Buildings closer to street; Pedestrian scale – walk able, accented storefronts; Variable roof-lines; Transitional massing blending with surrounding architecture; Sense of place/downtown identity; Destination and convenience retail; Shared parking; Convenience. The District is intended for both stand-alone parcels and larger grouping of parcels as long as the objective is to promote the characteristics above. Commercial uses are encouraged from Bay Lane Drive to Pioneer Drive and residential uses are encouraged from Pioneer Drive to Racine Avenue as per the direction of the Muskego Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning requests for parcels that do not meet the intent of this zoning district should follow existing residential and commercial zoning districts. (2) BASIC REGULATIONS (A) Lot Size (B) Density (C) Open Space Minimum Area Min. Average Width Residential Lot Area Per D/U Minimum per Parcel Lot Area Per D/U 7,200 SF* 60’* 5,000 2,500 SF (D) Primary Structure Building Location Min. Setback (from ROW) Max. Setback (from ROW) Minimum Offset One Side All Other Sides 10’ - 5’ 10’ (E) Primary Structure Building Size (F) Building Height Min. Residential Floor Area Floor Area Ratio Maximum Permitted Single-Family Multi-Family (per D/U) Principal Structure Accessory Structure 1st Floor Total - 1,200 SF 1,000 SF 40% 35’ See 17:4.05 (G) Accessory Structure Building Location Min. Setback (from ROW) Max. Setback (from ROW) Minimum Offset One Side All Other Sides 25’ N/A 5’ 10’ * This District does not promote new parcels of this size, but allows parcels to be conforming if they meet these guidelines. Newly created parcels in this district should meet the size requirements of the B-2 Zoning District for commercial uses (Minimum Parcel Area = 20,000 SF; Minimum Parcel Width = 100 feet) and the size requirements of the RS-3 Zoning District for residential uses (Minimum Parcel Area = 15,000 SF; Minimum Parcel Width = 100 feet). (3) USE REGULATIONS A. PERMITTED USES BY RIGHT 1. Single-family detached dwellings. 2. The following subject to approval by the Plan Commission of building, site and operational plans: a. Single-family attached, Duplex, or Townhouse structures. b. Retail stores and shops. c. Public administration offices and public service buildings. d. Community and customer service establishments such as, but not limited to, the following: i. Business, professional, public service, banking and savings and loan offices. ii. Delicatessen, Produce/Meat Market iii. Clothing Store iv. Restaurants, taverns and other commercial entertainment facilities v. Hotels vi. Laundry/Dry Cleaning Services. vii. Specialty Foods (Bakeries, Confectionaries, etc.) viii. Specialty Store (Books, Music, Toys, Sporting Goods, Stationery, etc.) ix. Variety Store x. Commercial studios, display galleries and training schools. xi. Public utility offices and installations xii. Accounting, Auditing, Bookkeeping, and Tax Preparation xiii. Architectural, Engineering, Planning & Surveying Services xiv. Barber/Beauty/Hair Salon & Related Personal Care xv. Bed and Breakfast Establishments xvi. Café, Coffee Shop, Diner, Restaurant xvii. Desktop Publishing & Graphic Design xviii. Legal Services xix. Lessons (Art, Dance, Music, etc.) xx. Medical/Dental Offices, including Veterinary xxi. Photography Studio xxii. Real estate xxiii. Tax Preparation xxiv. General Merchandising and wholesaling establishments B. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES 1. Private garages subject to the provisions of this Code subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator and upon payment of fees and receipt of permits as required by the Common Council and amended from time to time. 2. One (1) private garden shed subject to the provisions of this Code subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator and upon payment of fees and receipt of permits as required by the Common Council and amended from time to time. 3. Any other structure or use normally accessory to the principal uses permitted. 4. Home Occupations when incidental to the principal residential use, as outlined in this Code. C. PERMITTED USES BY CONDITIONAL GRANT 1. The following subject to approval by the Plan Commission of Building Site and Operational Plans: a. Dwelling units accessory to commercial uses b. Gasoline and Automobile Service Stations c. Nursing/rest homes, homes for all aged, and daycares. (Ord. #1351 – 03-22-2012) 2. Agricultural uses COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF MUSKEGO ORDINANCE #1362 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Common Council of the City of Muskego does hereby amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan to reflect the following changes: Chapter 8 - Page 218 – Strike the following: Future Lake Access Note (Shown as Note #5a - #5b on 2020 Land Use Map) Bringing back the lake to downtown Muskego was a large topic during the formulation of this Plan. At this point of time, there is no direct access or views to Little Muskego Lake from the downtown and Janesville Road. This Plan looks to promote increased lake access and view sheds to the lake in two different areas. The first area is located along Lannon Drive, just north of Janesville Road (5a on the map). Connecting lake access to a future development in the former Parkland Mall property is encouraged in this area. The second opportunity is on the east side of the Little Muskego Lake dam along Janesville Court on the southern end of the lake off of Janesville Road (5b on the map). A larger property exists to the east of the dam that has the possibility to be incorporated with other properties in this area to create a large lake access and view shed along the heavily traveled Janesville Road. Recommendations of this DDA include that future decision making bodies be sensitive to how these lake accesses are developed in order to assure that the access points work well with the surrounding land uses. Parcels should be looked to be purchased by the community as funds become available, development takes place, and/or properties go up for sale. Future lake accesses and view sheds will hopefully bring the lake back into the community and create new opportunities for residents and visitors to enjoy an original amenity that Muskego has for so long been based upon. 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Map – Strike the following text on the map along with the removal of the graphics denoting 5a and 5b (See the attached map for more details): NOTES #5a-5b: Future Lake Access Increased lake access and view sheds to the Little Muskego Lake in two different areas is promoted to bring back the lake into the community and for residents and visitors to enjoy an original amenity that Muskego has for so long been based upon. The first area is locate along Lannon Drive, just north of Janesville Road (5a on the map) and the second opportunity is on the east side of the Little Muskego Lake dam (5b on the map). The City should look to purchase parcels as funds are available, development takes place, and/or properties go up for sale. SECTION 2: A Public Hearing was held regarding the proposed amendments on June 26, 2012 in front of the Common Council. Ordinance #1362 SECTION 3: The several sections of this ordinance are declared to be severable. If any section or portion thereof shall be declared by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unlawful, or unenforceable, such decision shall apply only to the specific section or portion thereof directly specified in the decision, and not affect the validity of all other provisions, sections, or portion thereof of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect. Any other ordinances whose terms are in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed as to those terms that conflict. SECTION 4: This ordinance is in full force and effect from and after passage and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012. CITY OF MUSKEGO ________________________________ Kathy Chiaverotti, Mayor ATTEST: First Reading: 06/26/2012 ____________________________ Clerk-Treasurer Notice of Newly Enacted Ordinance Published: 6/12jmb CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Council June 26, 2012 Meeting To: Common Council From: Jeff Muenkel, AICP Subject: 2020 Plan Amendments – Lake Access/Park Notations Date: June 19, 2012 Background Information: The Council adopted Resolution #049-2012 on April 24, 2012. This resolution was to formally terminate past resolutions concerning the city pursuing the purchase of various Little Muskego lakefront properties for a future park purposes. As part of this resolution the resolution it read: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Muskego will remove the reference to the lake properties in the Park and Conservation Plan and also directs City staff to bring forth 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendments to possibly remove the “Future Lake Access” notations from the Plan. The Council did remove the lake properties reference from the Park and Conservation Plan recently and now it is time to consider the references noted in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. As found attached, the public hearing was noticed appropriately showing that the Council will consider amending the 2020 Comprehensive Plan to remove all references to the lake access/park notations. These references simply consist of removing the paragraphs in Chapter 8 found on page 218 noted below and the text and map notations scratched out on the attached 2020 Land Use Map. Staff Discussion/Recommendation: It should be noted that considerable time was put into the 2020 Comprehensive Plan including two surveys, 20+ public meetings, and various public hearings. The 2020 Comprehensive Planning Committee discussed the lake park notations only due to input from the public over the two years the Plan was put together. Good discussion of the 2020 Committee’s thoughts should be found at the Planning Commission recommendation regarding this subject on Monday July 9th as two members of the 2020 Committee are now a part of Planning Commission. In all, staff doesn’t see any doubt that having a lake park attached to a downtown could benefit and define a city. Having such an asset is only unique to few municipalities and any opportunity should at least be considered. In order to preserve at least this opportunity staff will be recommending that not all lake park references are removed from the 2020 Plan but that they are simply amended. Removing the exact locations desired for a lake park from the 2020 map and text is fair since we don’t know exactly where such a lake park could be defined in the future. However, the text in the 2020 Plan and Map could still note that the City will consider a future lake park access should the current governing body decide to and should an opportunity come the Council’s way. Doing so does not solidify any requirement of the city to establish a lake park access but at least preserves the intent of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan when it was adopted. Further it shows that the City of Muskego believes that the lake is an asset to the present/future of the community and that the city desires to still consider anything that may benefit the future prosperity of the city. The staff recommended amendment can be found attached to the bottom of this supplemental memo. Amendments for Consideration Chapter 8 - Page 218 – Future Lake Access Note (Shown as Note #5a - #5b on 2020 Land Use Map) Bringing back the lake to downtown Muskego was a large topic during the formulation of this Plan. At this point of time, there is no direct access or views to Little Muskego Lake from the downtown and Janesville Road. This Plan looks to promote increased lake access and view sheds to the lake in two different areas. The first area is located along Lannon Drive, just north of Janesville Road (5a on the map). Connecting lake access to a future development in the former Parkland Mall property is encouraged in this area. The second opportunity is on the east side of the Little Muskego Lake dam along Janesville Court on the southern end of the lake off of Janesville Road (5b on the map). A larger property exists to the east of the dam that has the possibility to be incorporated with other properties in this area to create a large lake access and view shed along the heavily traveled Janesville Road. Recommendations of this DDA include that future decision making bodies be sensitive to how these lake accesses are developed in order to assure that the access points work well with the surrounding land uses. Parcels should be looked to be purchased by the community as funds become available, development takes place, and/or properties go up for sale. Future lake accesses and view sheds will hopefully bring the lake back into the community and create new opportunities for residents and visitors to enjoy an original amenity that Muskego has for so long been based upon. 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Map – This also includes the removal of the 5a and 5b designations on the 2020 Future Land Use Map along with the “Notes” text found on the map (See the attached map for more details): NOTES #5a-5b: Future Lake Access Increased lake access and view sheds to the Little Muskego Lake in two different areas is promoted to bring back the lake into the community and for residents and visitors to enjoy an original amenity that Muskego has for so long been based upon. The first area is locate along Lannon Drive, just north of Janesville Road (5a on the map) and the second opportunity is on the east side of the Little Muskego Lake dam (5b on the map). The City should look to purchase parcels as funds are available, development takes place, and/or properties go up for sale. Staff Recommended Amendments Chapter 8 - Page 218 – Future Lake Access Note (Shown as Note #5a - #5b on 2020 Land Use Map) Bringing back the lake to downtown Muskego was a large topic during the formulation of this Plan. At this point of time, there is no direct access or views to Little Muskego Lake from the downtown and Janesville Road. This Plan looks to promote increased lake access and view sheds to the lake in two different areas. The first area is located along Lannon Drive, just north of Janesville Road (5a on the map). Connecting lake access to a future development in the former Parkland Mall property is encouraged in this area. The second opportunity is on the east side of the Little Muskego Lake dam along Janesville Court on the southern end of the lake off of Janesville Road (5b on the map). A larger property exists to the east of the dam that has the possibility to be incorporated with other properties in this area to create a large lake access and view shed along the heavily traveled Janesville Road. Recommendations of this DDA include that future decision making bodies be sensitive to how these lake accesses are developed in order to assure that the access points work well with the surrounding land uses. Parcels may should be looked to be purchased by the community as funds become available, development takes place, and/or properties go up for sale. Future lake accesses and view sheds will hopefully bring the lake back into the community and create new opportunities for residents and visitors to enjoy an original amenity that Muskego has for so long been based upon. 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Map – The staff recommended amendment would still include removing the exact locations (#5a and 5b) on the 2020 Future Land Use Map as shown attached. However, we would propose that the “Notes” on the Future Land Use map be amended as follows instead: NOTES #5a-5b: Future Lake Access Increased lake access and view sheds to the Little Muskego Lake in two different areas is promoted to bring back the lake into the community and for residents and visitors to enjoy an original amenity that Muskego has for so long been based upon. The first area is locate along Lannon Drive, just north of Janesville Road (5a on the map) and the second opportunity is on the east side of the Little Muskego Lake dam (5b on the map). The City should look to purchase parcels as funds are available, development takes place, and/or properties go up for sale. OPERATORS’ LIST FOR MEETING ON 7/10/2012 Bobbie Jo Bartolotta Melanie Blomquist Anna D’Amato Stephanie Diekfuss Diane Hernitz Kayla Kakonis Jamie Kotnarnowski Raeann Kuemmerlein June Ann Loh Tara Maney Jayme Martin Thomas Pajot Kaylin Pichler Samantha Sawdy Valerie Sawicki Christine Sobczyk Melissa Sorce Rose Stoeger Emily Weitkunat Diane Whitehouse Paula Zeller COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF MUSKEGO Unapproved MINUTES OF MEETING HELD JUNE 26, 2012 Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 7:28 p.m. Present were Ald. Madden, Schaumberg, Soltysiak, Borgman, Harenda and Wolfe, Police Chief Geiszler, Community Development Director Muenkel and Finance and Administration Director Mueller. Ms. Mueller stated that the meeting was properly noticed. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR’S OFFICE Mayor Chiaverotti proclaimed July at Recreation and Parks Month. PUBLIC COMMENT The following spoke: Jerry Le Claire, W176 S7511 Harbor Circle Heidi Lindhorst, S75 W18094 Boszhardt Lane Suzi Link, W172 S7297 Lannon Drive Tom Ralston, S81 W19386 Highland Park Drive Debra Bolton, W186 S7569 Kingston Drive Robert Lucas, W198 S8456 Bendingbrae Drive NEW BUSINESS Mayor Chiaverotti stated that there were four applicants to fill the unexpired term of the District 4 alderperson. They are Reno Berg, Blaise Di Pronio, Robert Glazier and Nancy Salentine; all were present. She distributed the interview questions and reviewed the process that would be followed. The Mayor requested that only the candidate being interviewed by the Council be present and the others leave the room. A primary vote will be taken to narrow the field to two candidates. The Aldermen asked each candidate a series of questions. Mayor Chiaverotti thanked all four of the applicants for their interest in the position. Paper ballots were distributed; the Mayor noted that the ballot had to be signed. The results of the first primary ballot were as follows: Blaise Di Pronio Voted by Ald. Wolfe Robert Glazier Voted by Ald. Borgman, Soltysiak, Schaumberg and Madden Nancy Salentine Voted by Ald. Harenda The results of the second primary ballot were as follows: Blaise Di Pronio Voted by Ald. Wolfe Robert Glazier Voted by Ald. Harenda, Borgman, Soltysiak, Schaumberg and Madden The following votes were then cast: Blaise Di Pronio Voted by Ald. Wolfe Robert Glazier Voted by Ald. Harenda, Borgman, Soltysiak, Schaumberg and Madden Sharon Mueller swore in Mr. Glazier who took his seat at the Council table. Common Council Minutes 2 June 26, 2012 The Council took a brief recess. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ms. Mueller read the public hearing notice to consider revisions to Chapter 36 – Wireless Communications Facilities – Section 36.04 (6) of the City of Muskego Municipal Code relating to Public Safety Communications. Police Chief Paul Geiszler was present. He stated that the City has attempted to receive cellular 911 calls directly. Currently Waukesha County Communication Center handles that and has been reluctant to relinquish it to the City. The City is legally entitled to receive the calls directly. The PSC and FCC have indicated that they cannot become involved in the issue. The City Attorney has proposed an am endment to the City’s Municipal Code, which addresses cell tower usage. The ordinance would give the City the right of first refusal. Chief Geiszler stated there is a time delay when the call initially goes to Waukesha County and is then routed to Muskego. He believes this delay is crucial in emergency situations. No one requested to speak on this matter; the Mayor declared the hearing closed. Ms. Mueller read the public hearing notice to consider the petition of Daniel Hewitt to rezone property, known as Tax Key No. 2195.999 located on Janesville Road, from RL-3 – Lakeshore Residence District to DR-1 – Downtown Revival District for continued and future commercial and residential uses. A 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendment will also be required for this parcel from Medium Density Residential to Commercial. Mr. Muenkel stated the subject parcel is known as D. J.’s Pub & Grill located on Janesville Road. The property is approximately 1.5 acres in size. It contains the pub, which has a living unit above and two residential structures. Mr. Hewitt is requesting the rezoning because the pub and one of the residential structures will be removed as part of Phase 2 of the Janesville Road Reconstruction Project. The property owner does intend to rebuild the pub and grill with residential units above it. The DR-1 zoning district was recently approved for P & L Insurance just 300 feet west of D.J.’s. It does encourage mixed use development. Plan Commission will review this petition at its July 9 meeting. The future development of the property will be subject to approval of the Plan Commission. The current commercial use has been legal nonconforming for quite some time. In order for Mr. Hewitt to rebuild a new restaurant, a rezoning is required as once the building is removed, the zoning in place (Single Family Residential) is what must be followed. Mr. Hewitt recapped Mr. Muenkel’s comments. He stated he would like to rebuild the restaurant and that is why the rezoning is being requested. Rick Burback, Burback Builders  Committed to working with the City to get the establishment rebuilt.  Plan is for a restaurant, which Muskego can use. The following spoke regarding the rezoning petition: Debra Bolton, W186 S7569 Kingston Drive  Opposes the rezoning because this is a lakeshore property and should remain residential.  Opposes commercial use as tavern because of the issues that arise.  Opposes commercial use adjacent to residential. Common Council Minutes 3 June 26, 2012 Heidi Lindhorst, S75 W18094 Boszhardt Lane  Does not know what future plans are.  Would like the tavern/restaurant built on Janesville Road and the residential structure on the lakefront.  Requests the Council wait to see a plan. Suzi Link, W172 S7297 Lannon Drive  Believes rezoning is premature. Plan Commission should review first and there should be a plan.  The City should allow them to replace what they currently have without rezoning.  Rezoning would require an amendment to the 2020 Comp Plan. Jerry Le Claire, W176 S7511 Harbor Circle  Does not want to see Mr. Hewitt lose his business.  Should allow current uses to be grandfathered.  Rezoning is premature; need to see plans first. David Taube, S75 W18687 Kingston Drive  Concerned about the density allowed in the DR-1 District.  Specific development details are missing for the Council to make a decision to rezone.  Plans should be approved by the Plan Commission first.  Concerned that incorrect decision could adversely affect the lake. John Lemke (Representing his mother)  Several of the buildings are in violation of offsets.  Any new structure should be properly placed on lot.  Mr. Hewitt told him he did not intend to rebuild the tavern. Jim Lindhorst, S75 W18094 Boszhardt Lane  Does not want the tavern to be relocated closer to his house. The Mayor clarified that the Council would not be voting on th e rezoning at this meeting. The Plan Commission will review the rezoning at its July 9 meeting. The public hearing is held first so the Plan Commission can review the input. Mr. Muenkel stated that he does not believe there is any provision in the Municipal Code that would allow the existing uses to be grandfathered. He will consult with the City Attorney to see if there would be another option. He believes it would require a change to the zoning code. Ald. Wolfe  The road reconstruction is causing this situation. He would like the option of grandfathering to be looked at. Ald. Harenda  Suggests a plan be put together, which may alleviate some of the concerns. The Mayor noted that any questions should be directed to Mr. Muenkel. She told Mr. Hewitt that the plan must include all the structures on the property. Mayor Chiaverotti declared the hearing closed. Ms. Mueller read the public hearing notice to consider revisions to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan – Chapter 8 and Future Land Use Map. Common Council Minutes 4 June 26, 2012 Mr. Muenkel stated that the Council adopted Reso. #049-2012 in April. This resolution formally terminated previous resolutions concerning the City pursuing the purchase of various Little Muskego lakefront properties for future park purposes. The resolution also directed staff to bring forth 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendments to possibly remove the “Future Lake Access” notations from the Plan. These references consist of removing the paragraphs in Chapter 8 found on Page 218 and the text and map notations crossed out on the 2020 Land Use Map. The proposed ordinance will be reviewed by the Plan Commission on July 9, which would remove the references in totality. However, staff will recommend to the Plan Commission that not all lake park references be removed from the Plan. Mr. Muenkel stated doing this will preserve the intent of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan when it was adopted. The following spoke regarding the proposed amendments: David Taube, S75 W18687 Kingston Drive  Requested clarification regarding the “Statement of Intent” for the DR-1 Zoning District. Jerry Le Claire, W176 S7511 Harbor Circle  Concerned about the staff recommendation to leave some of the lake park references in. Heidi Lindhorst, S75 W18094 Boszhardt Lane  Believes all the lake park references should be removed. Debra Bolton, W186 S7569 Kingston Drive  She supports all the lake park reference being removed. Suzi Link, W172 S7297 Lannon Drive  View sheds were discussed in the past.  Does not like that staff are undercutting direction from the Counci l. Rob Lucas, W198 S8456 Bendingbrae Drive  There is a minority who do not want development on the lake.  The Council should consider the staff recommendation. It provides flexibility for the future. It is common sense to only strike the specific parcels that have requested it. A lot of effort was put into the 2020 Plan. David Taube, S75 W18687 Kingston Drive  Strike all references. Ald. Borgman stated his objections to holding the public hearing before the issue goes to the Plan Commission for review and a recommendation. Mr. Muenkel stated that the Plan Commission has requested the input from the public hearing. This process was established before the department was under his direction. The Mayor closed the public hearing and thanked all those that attended. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Reso. #054-2012 – Resolution of the City of Muskego Common Council to Adopt the Economic Development and Marketing Plan 2012. On the floor, deferred May 8, 2012. The following discussion took place: Common Council Minutes 5 June 26, 2012 Ald. Harenda asked if the wording could be changed to indicate that high density is not being encouraged on the lake. Mr. Muenkel stated the language is a consultant’s recommendation; there is nothing binding. The Mayor stated this was an opinion that was asked for and paid for. She is not comfortable making changes. Ald. Madden agreed. Ald. Wolfe disagreed. He believes it is within the power of the Council to make changes. Ald. Glazier stated the City hired the consultants to obtain an opinion; it is to be used as a guide. Motion to adopt carried 7 in favor. CONSENT AGENDA Ald. Borgman moved to approve the remaining items under the Consent Agenda. Ald. Glazier seconded. Motion carried 7 in favor. The following items were approved: Approval of Operators’ Licenses for Tierney Berigan, Stephanie Bluemel, David Boyce, Brian Chic, Dawn Consentino, Kim Coubal, Gail Dickow, Mark Dumont, Alexander Eversum, Rachael Felda, Scott Fischer, Nicole Harmeyer, JoEllyn Hecimovich, Kathleen Heinz, Lisa Kisting, Ann Knepper (subject to a s ix-month review), Tracy Lang, Meghan Lau, Doris Leighton, Kimberly Lococo, Erin McGowan, Sandra Meier, Kristine Nimmer, Samantha Osborne, Debra Renk, Michael Schuh, Ericka Schulta, Patti Schultz, Sheila Schultz, Mark Sommers, Heather Stigler, Stacy Trebby and Richard Vernon, Jr. Approval of Common Council Minutes – June 12 and June 21, 2012 Reso. #067-2012 – Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources NR 208 – Compliance Maintenance Resolution for 2011 Reso. #068-2012 – Approval of Various License Applications for the City of Muskego for the Licensing Period July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013. Reso. #069-2012 – Approval of Janesville Road Landscape Expenditure (Tess Corners Area) REVIEW OF COMMITTEE REPORTS The following minutes were reviewed: 5/14/2012 Parks & Recreation Board, 5/2 2012 Public Works Committee, 5/15/2012 Community Development Authority. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES Ord. #1361 – An Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan of the City of Muskego (Hewitt – RL-3 to DR-1). Ord. #1362 – An Ordinance to Amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Muskego. Common Council Minutes 6 June 26, 2012 LICENSE APPROVAL Ald. Soltysiak moved to approve the following: Temporary License to Sell Fermented Malt Beverages Muskego Lions Club – July 6 and August 3, 2012 – Jammin’ on Janesville S75 W17475 Janesville Road – DeWinter Eye Care Muskego Area Chamber of Commerce – July 6, 2012 – Jammin’ on Janesville S74 W17095 Janesville Road – North Shore Bank Ald. Schaumberg seconded. Motion carried 7 in favor. VOUCHER APPROVAL Ald. Borgman moved for approval of payment of Utility Vouchers in the amount of $66,655.26. Ald. Harenda seconded. Motion carried 7 in favor. Ald. Borgman moved for approval of payment of General Fund Vouchers in the amount of $240,322.99. Ald. Harenda seconded. Motion carried 7 in favor. CITY OFFICIALS’ REPORTS The July calendar was reviewed. The Mayor distributed the budget calendar. She also noted that she has been consulting with the Fire Chief on a daily basis regarding a potential burn ban. Permits for fireworks would not be included if a ban on burning is put in place. A special Council meeting may have to be called to address fireworks. CLOSED SESSION The Mayor announced that the Council would convene into closed session. Ald. Harenda moved to convene into closed session pursuant to Wis. Stats. §19.85(1)(e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session, more specifically labor negotiations for 2012. Ald. Soltysiak seconded; motion carried. OPEN SESSION Ald. Borgman moved to reconvene in open session. Ald. Wolfe seconded; motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Ald. Glazier moved to adjourn at 11:05 p.m. Ald. Soltysiak seconded; motion carried. Minutes transcribed by Jill Blenski, CMC Deputy Clerk COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF MUSKEGO RESOLUTION #071-2012 APPOINTMENT OF ALDERMAN TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, It is the responsibility of the Mayor to appoint a representative of the Common Council to the Library Board, Parks & Recreation Board, Community Development Authority and Conservation Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Muskego does hereby approve the appointment of the following alderm an to serve as the Common Council representative: Community Development Authority Alderman Rob Glazier (Term to Expire 4/16/2013) DATED THIS DAY OF , 2012. SPONSORED BY: Mayor Kathy Chiaverotti This is to certify that this is a true and accurate copy of Resolution #071-2012 which was adopted by the Common Council of the City of Muskego. _________________________ Clerk-Treasurer 7/12jmb COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF MUSKEGO RESOLUTION #072-2012 AP POINTMENT OF CITIZEN MEMBER TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, It is the responsibility of the Mayor to appoint citizen members to the City’s various Boards and Commissions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED That the Common Council of the City of Muskego does hereby confirm the appointment of the following individual to serve as follows: Board or Commission Appointment Term to Expire Community Development Authority Gerald Boisits To fulfill the unexpired term of Rob Glazier May 1, 2015 DATED THIS DAY OF , 2012. SPONSORED BY: Mayor Kathy Chiaverotti This is to certify that this is a true and accurate copy of Resolution #072-2012 which was adopted by the Common Council of the City of Muskego. ______________________________ Clerk-Treasurer 7/12jmb CITY OF MUSKEGO Approved 6/26/2012 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES Tuesday, May 22, 2012 Muskego City Hall Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. Committee Members Ald. Borgman, Ald. Soltysiak, and Ald. Schaumberg were present as well as Finance and Administration Director Mueller and Deputy Clerk Blenski. Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. The Deputy Clerk stated that the meeting was properly noticed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ald. Borgman requested that the May 8, 2012 minutes be corrected regarding the motion and second made for the Pioneer Drive Reconstruction Project and moved for approval. Ald. Soltysiak seconded; motion carried. LICENSE APPROVALS Operators Ald. Soltysiak moved to recommend approval of an Operator’s License for Kathleen Allan-Larson, Katie Cunico, Michelle Doyle, William Doyle, Katrina Slomski and Joseph Vagnini subject to the licensing requirements being completed prior to issuance. Ald. Schaumberg seconded; motion carried. Other Permits and Licenses Ald. Borgman moved to recommend approval of the following: Outside Dance Permit Marx Pioneer Inn – June 16, 2012 W180 S7808 Pioneer Drive J.D.’s on Hillendale – August 18, 2012 W191 S6409 Hillendale Drive Tres Locos – June 1 and 2, July 6 and 7, August 3 and 4, 2012 W172 S7505 Lannon Drive Outside Dance Permit and Amendment to Licensed Premise Sauced – June 10 and October 6, 2012 S78 W16355 Woods Road A.J. Bar & Grill – June 9, 2012 S90 W13970 Boxhorn Drive Temporary License to Sell Fermented Malt Beverages and Wine Chamber of Commerce – July 18, 2012 Idle Isle Temporary License to Sell Fermented Malt Beverages Muskego Warriors Youth Baseball – June 1, July 6 and August 3, 2012 S73 W16610 Janesville Road – Jammin’ on Janesville Ald. Schaumberg seconded; motion carried. Recommendation Regarding Labor Attorney Assistance with Employee Handbook Development City Labor Attorney James Korom of von Briesen & Roper was present. He told the committee that there are several different choices as to how to proceed with the Finance Committee Minutes Page 2 May 22, 2012 development of the handbook. Attorney Korom stated the majority of municipalities are having administration work with staff to draft various sections of the handbook and then report back to the City officials. It would be appropriate for the City’s Finance Committee to review what the administration develops and provide input. He also indicated that there should be some templates already developed by other municipalities and school districts. Ald. Soltysiak moved to proceed with formulating the handbook, section by section at the administration level, with each section to be reviewed by the Finance Committee as it is available. Ald. Borgman seconded; motion carried. Recommendation Regarding Designating Muskego Now as the Official City Newspaper Ald. Soltysiak moved to recommend designating the Muskego Now as the official City newspaper. Ald. Borgman seconded; motion carried. Recommendation Regarding Lease Agreement with Kristin Formolo for Idle Isle Concessions Kristin Formolo was present. Ald. Borgman expressed his support. The Mayor agreed and said she hopes the endeavor is successful. Ald. Soltysiak recommended approval of the lease agreement with Ms. Formolo for Idle Isle Concessions. Ald. Borgman seconded; motion carried. Recommendation Regarding Boxhorn Warehouse Lease Agreement Ald. Borgman moved to recommend approval. Ald. Schaumberg seconded; motion carried. Recommendation Regarding Award of Bid – Woods Road Trail Construction The following bids were received: CONTRACTOR BASE BID Veit $430,622.75 Mainline Sewer $599,320.00 Poblocki Paving $459,581.00 C. W. Purpero $411,569.75 Payne & Dolan $404,735.25 Wolf Paving $384,628.04 Lalonde $435,282.50 Western Contractors $464,400.00 Schaefer Snowplowing $369,900.00 (Bid form was not complete.) Ald. Borgman moved to recommend that the bid be awarded to Wolf Paving in the amount of $384,628.04. Ald. Soltysiak seconded; motion carried. Recommendation Regarding Amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.06 (2)(a), of the Municipal Code of the City of Muskego (Term of Municipal Judge) Mayor Chiaverotti stated an amendment to the municipal code is necessary to reflect that the term of the municipal judge is dictated by state statute, which is currently four years. Ald. Borgman moved to recommend approval. Ald. Soltysiak seconded; motion carried. VOUCHER APPROVAL Ald. Borgman moved to recommend approval of Utility Vouchers in the amount $49,610.90. Ald. Schaumberg seconded; motion carried. Finance Committee Minutes Page 3 May 22, 2012 Ald. Borgman moved to recommend approval of General Fund Vouchers in the amount $490,271.10. Ald. Schaumberg seconded; motion carried. FINANCE DIRECTOR’S REPORT Ms. Mueller gave an update on the audit. She anticipates having 2011 annual results and the first quarter of 2012 available by mid-June. ADJOURNMENT Ald. Borgman moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 p.m. Ald. Schaumberg seconded; motion carried. Jill Blenski Deputy City Clerk STATE OF WISCONSIN CITY OF MUSKEGO WAUKESHA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1363 AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL AND RECREATE SECTION 36.04(6) OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO CITY CODE RELATED TO WIRELESS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS WHEREAS, on February 3, 2011, the City of Muskego Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) completed a wireless 911 telecommunications upgrade which enabled the PSAP to receive Phase I and Phase II wireless 911 information and geographically plot and re-bid caller location within the computerized dispatch mapping system, to allow cellular 911 calls to be routed directly to the City of Muskego PSAP; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2011, the City of Muskego Common Council adopted Resolution No. 48-2011 which declared the City of Muskego Police Department a primary wireless 911 PSAP, in accordance with Wisconsin Statute Section 256.35(3m)(c)(6), and approve funding for the costs associated with operating a primary wireless 911 PSAP; and WHEREAS, the City of Muskego has completed all necessary applications and procedures to require wireless carriers that provide service in the City of Muskego to route cellular 911 calls originating within the City of Muskego directly to the City PSAP; and WHEREAS, on or about April 16, 2012, the Chief of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau for the Federal Communications Commission, James Arden Barnett, Jr., Rear Admiral (Ret.), notified the City of Muskego Chief of Police of his conclusion regarding the City of Muskego’s request to investigate denial of the City’s request to telecommunications carriers to provide 911 service to the City PSAP, and stated in relevant part that “wireless carriers who deliver 911 calls to either the City or the County PSAP are in compliance with Section 20.18(j);” and WHEREAS, the lack of federal regulation on this issue of whether the City or the County can demand direct Wireless 911 routing constitutes a void in federal or State regulation; and as to this void:  the legislature has not expressly withdrawn the power of municipalities to act,  requiring routing to the City does not logically conflict with the State or federal legislation,  requiring routing to the City does not defeat the purpose of the State or federal legislation, and 2  requiring routing to the City does not go against the spirit of the State or federal legislation; and WHEREAS, the ordinance that is hereby adopted only exerts local control over an issue for which no control is otherwise prescribed, and for which the FCC has found telecommunications providers will comply with applicable laws in their provision of this service to the City PSAP; and WHEREAS, the City of Muskego Police Department conducted a six month study between January and June, 2011, and found that calls routed through the Waukesha County Communications (WCC) resulted in an average 72 second delay in reaching the City of Muskego; and WHEREAS, in emergency situations, delay translates into personal injury, property damage and loss of lives, and any avoidable delay is simply unacceptable; and WHEREAS, delays as large as were discovered by the City of Muskego study will certainly mean loss of life in the City of Muskego at some time in the future if cellular 911 calls are not routed directly to the City of Muskego PSAP; and WHEREAS, even in the recent past, the unnecessary delay of routing cellular 911 calls through the WCC, instead of routing them directly to the City of Muskego PSAP, has severely impaired response time and may have resulted in significant adverse injury, including on Thursday, 8-11-11, when a call was delayed by WCC for 57 seconds before the call finally reached the City of Muskego, during which time the patient was non-responsive, and ultimately when the City received the call and responded, the patient had died and could not be revived; and WHEREAS, every second matters in life and death emergency response situations; and WHEREAS, this change has been initiated by the Common Council and has been duly referred to the City of Muskego Plan Commission; and WHEREAS, the City of Muskego Plan Commission has conducted such study and investigation as it deems desirable and has provided its report and recommendation to the Common Council; and WHEREAS, following the provision of Class 2 notice as described in Wisconsin Statutes Sections 62.23(7)(d)(2), 62.23(7)(d)(1)(b), and Chapter 985, Wis. Stats., the Common Council conducted a public hearing regarding this change; and WHEREAS, upon consideration of the recommendation of the Plan Commission, comments received at the public hearing in this matter, and being duly advised, and in order to promote the health, safety, morals, prosperity, aesthetics and general welfare 3 of the City of Muskego, and in order to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, the City of Muskego finds that the City Code should be amended as described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Muskego Common Council, Waukesha County, Wisconsin, HEREBY ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 36 of the City of Muskego Municipal Code entitled “Wireless Communications Facilities,” Section 36.04 entitled “General Performance Standards,” subsection (6) entitled “Interference with Public Safety Communications,” is hereby repealed and recreated with the title “Public Safety Communications,” as follows: (6) Interference with Public Safety Communications. (a) No new or existing telecommunications service shall interfere with public safety telecommunications. All applications for new service shall be accompanied by an intermodulation study which provides a technical evaluation of existing and proposed transmissions and indicates all potential interference problems. Before the introduction of new service or changes in existing service, telecommunication providers shall notify the municipality at least ten calendar days in advance of such changes and allow the municipality to monitor interference levels during the testing process. (b) All new or existing telecommunications service providers shall route Cellular 911 calls originating within the City of Muskego directly to the City of Muskego Public Safety Answering Point as demanded by the City of Muskego Chief of Police, subject to the following. The Chief of Police shall impose no demands that conflict with any express requirement of any State or federal law or regulation, and all necessary procedures to implement this change shall be made pursuant to applicable State and federal laws. SECTION 2: SEVERABILITY. The several sections of this ordinance are declared to be severable. If any section or portion thereof shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unlawful or unenforceable, such decision shall apply only to the specific section or portion thereof directly specified in the decision, and shall not affect the validity of any other provisions, sections or portions thereof of the ordinance. The remainder of the ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Any other ordinance whose terms are in Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5", Hanging: 0.5" 4 conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed as to those terms that conflict. SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication or posting as provided by law. Dated this ___ day of _______________, 2012. CITY OF MUSKEGO __________________________ Kathy Chiaverotti, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Sharon Mueller, City Clerk This ordinance posted or published ______________________. B:\MyFiles\Muskego\Cellular 911\Ord.04-26-12 Council Date JULY 10, 2012 Total Vouchers All Funds $401,665.32 Total Voucher Approval Utility Vouchers (Approve Separately) Water Vouchers $11,377.02 Water Wire Transfers Total Water $11,377.02 Sewer Vouchers 11,380.68 Sewer Wire Transfers Total Sewer $11,380.68 Net Total Utility Vouchers $ 22,757.70 #1 - Utility Voucher Approval Tax Vouchers - Refunds & Tax Settlements (Approve Separately) Tax Vouchers $ Tax Void Checks ()** Total Tax Vouchers $ - #2 - Tax Voucher Approval Total General Fund Vouchers (Approve Separately) General Fund Vouchers $372,544.62 General Fund Void Checks ()** Total General Fund Vouchers $ 372,544.62 #3 - General Voucher Approval Big Muskego Lake Vouchers $6,363.00 Wire transfers (Approve Separately): Tax Settlements $ Debt Service $ Miscellaneous $ #4 - Wire Transfers Approval Void Checks Since Last Report Check #Amount Check #Amount 128338 255.04 Water Total *** Sewer Total 255.04 *Total ***