Loading...
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - MINUTES- 9/23/2008 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE – CITY OF MUSKEGO Approved: 10/2/2008 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Johnson, Ald. Snead, Pavelko, Borgman, Werner, Schneider, Schaefer and Fiedler. Department Heads/Other Staff present: Finance Department Supervisor Mueller, IS Director Sommers, and Computer Specialist Quijano, Guests: Jeff Verburgt, Jeff Jones, Mary Kalk, Wanda Jackson, Leone Schnetz, Frances Klanchar and other residents of The Muskego Regency STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting law. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ald. Borgman moved for approval of the September 18, 2008 minutes. Ald. Snead seconded; motion carried. Mayor Johnson noted that he would accept public comment at the end of the meeting. 2009 BUDGET Tess Corners Volunteer Fire Department Mr. Jeff Verburgt, Chairman of the Board of the Tess Corners Volunteer Fire Department, spoke on the operating and capital budgets for the department. Their capital budget requests of $500,000 has been reduced by approximately $50,000. Under their capital budget requests, they have  SCBAs The FPA has changed regulations on what the fire department’s can use as their air tanks, masks, etc. In the past, they were able to update in increments such as doing 10 or 15 masks per year and go with the current updates. The FPA has made so many changes that none of the department’s equipment as of August was able to be updated any more. They have to purchase all the units (tanks, face masks, harness) brand new. As this is going to be a large expenditure, they put the amount of $400,000 to outfit approximately 65 SCBAs. They are looking at three vendors. They have a committee set up researching the item. Once they get the results back from the committee, they’ll have final figures. The last year capital budget they had anticipated $380,000 for the project which was inflated to not to exceed type figure. The vendor will supply all the necessary training.  Replace Roof Station #1 They put aside $55,000 in the past to be looked at under capital budget. He had received one quote from a local contractor for around $10,000 less which is $45,440 for a roof replacement on Muskego Station #1 on Janesville Road. The roof is approximately 15-16 years old. He stated the rubber membrane on the Committee of the Whole Page 2 September 25, 2008 roof was a 45 mm. and the replacements are now 60 mm. It has to go through the bidding process so he’ll give the bid received to Council.  Phoenix Project Balance He explained that this would be the completion of the Phoenix system which is the software that the fire department uses to document how they get to each call and reports are also generated through this system. The system was started last year with an expenditure of about $160,000. They had $100,000 put into the budget for this year for the completion. They found because they combined the needs of both fire departments that will be reduced by approximately $40,000. The request for completion of the Phoenix system is $61,550. The first responders vehicles are on the list for the Phoenix as the support vehicles are limited so it will not be 100% on the laptops. Fire inspectors will have it. Mayor Johnson asked if there was any trade-in value in the old units. Mr. Verburgt said they’d be offered to other communities usually in rural areas. The research committee will be looking into all the options, including trade-in value. On the operating side of the budget, Mayor Johnson asked Mr. Verburgt to explain it. Mr. Verburgt said because Tess Corners is going to be doing the administration for the fire departments, they have to take a look at where they are and where they are going. They will be taking current budgeted figures from both companies and combine them to a figure of $500,000. That is approximately $60,000 less than what the proposed 2008 budget was. It will take awhile to get the administration in place and how the MVFD business was run to find out where they are going to be with the budget. It’s a combination of operation of both fire departments. Ald. Schaefer requested an itemized list of the budget items. Mr. Verburgt did not have information from MVFD so it would not be doable as he does not have access to any of their 2008 expenditures. $500,000 is the best figure based on last year’s numbers. If there is any overages, they would look at putting that towards 2010 capital budget for offsetting the operational budget for 2010. He mentioned that the city would be receiving quarterly operational reports. Cable TV For 2008, the cable club purchased a camera with a second camera to be looked at for purchasing in 2009. Mr. Jeff Jones, President of MPAG, answered the Common Council members inquiry on why the cable club needs the second camera. Mr. Jones stated that when they do video shoots, the second camera would facilitate a fast turnaround. They use a pair of cameras for coverage and an identical set makes it easier to manage. Plan was to get two newer cameras to supplement the two older cameras which gives them four, total. There are events where they could make use of four cameras. They do it for musical performances, sports activities and also for programs produced in the studio. Also, for an interviewing program or talk show, you need one camera on one person and the other camera on the other person. The difficulty in using an old camera with a new camera is matching up the shots with the newer ones having features not in the old cameras. The intent was to replace the antique cameras around 18 years old and not use them any more. The goal was to have two new cameras to replace the old and then there would also be the option of having two more cameras in the field. There would be more flexibility in covering events. The Muskego festival required more cameras than the club had to cover the many events. Sometimes the Committee of the Whole Page 3 September 25, 2008 people use their own cameras. It is best to have a high quality camera that is easy to use to get the best production. The life expectancy on a camera is hard to judge, but Mr. Jones expected them to be five years, possibly ten or fifteen. The old cameras have lasted ten years and they were used ones. Information Systems IS Director Joe Sommers presented a comparison for the IS Department verses outsourcing for 2009. His comparison was based on the quotes from two companies and the present IS Department.  Rate of Pay Comparison There are two positions now and each of the quotes received also have two positions. Comparing the rate of pay, Muskego is low and that’s where you want to be. River Run was surprising high. Those are discounted rates as well around 35%-40%. It’s possible they would go back to the normal rate after a matter of time.  Proposed Total Hours of Work Muskego has two full-time positions at 40 hours per week, roughly 4,160 hours. River Run was a quarter of that, 1,596 hours; and Premier at 3,080 hours. What you’d want is more hours worked. Consultants are able to make it attractive, because their rates are higher is to work less hours.  Cost if two FTE are Needed What if they are wrong? What if the two positions are needed? Either in the City of Muskego or contracted. City of Neenah is a similar size and they have a staff of five and Marshfield has twice the staff of Muskego. Cost of Muskego was $200,929 compared to River Run at $423,800 and Premier at $222,912. In reviewing the contracts, he noted the following:  River Run “drive time” to work is billable.  Premier cost includes $12,000 annual administrative fee per position.  River Run hours are “estimated.”  Projected savings will be reduced by increased salary for in-house IS management, increased cost of after-hours calls and other unknowns. With the current staff, there is no additional cost if they have to come in after hours or on weekends. If the city is wrong about the number of hours needed, it could hurt the city. Some additional considerations:  Current cost is fixed, even when 5 or 10 additional hours of work per week are required. Outsourcing costs grow exponentially when additional hours are required.  River Run quote does not have staff on-site during normal business hours; they have a total of 23 hours per week on-site by the12th month (3 hours for senior engineer and 20 hours for service engineer). In addition to the options to outsourcing presented at the last meeting, IS Director Sommers added using city’s fund balance to close the gap. They can always look at outsourcing next year if it makes sense. Committee of the Whole Page 4 September 25, 2008 Mayor Johnson shared with the members information received from three other companies. One company works under V.A.L.U.E. which is under the State contract and is bid out. He stated that Racine County, Racine City and the Milwaukee County use the Velocity and Premier companies which are sister companies. Mr. Clark, the owner, would be willing to come before Common Council members to answer questions of the company. Ald. Snead questioned the time frame if the city was going with outsourcing. Mayor Johnson said they would start working on it shortly after budget is approved. Library’s Training and Conference Item In an email, Acting Library Director Jane Genzel, indicated the item is for continuing education course work for the director and assistant director for their certification requirements. These course can range from $100-$400 each on average. Building Inspection Clerical Position Mayor Johnson advised that a mistake had been made in the building inspection clerical position. He had taken out of the budget an additional half position which was a half position too many. The intent was to leave a half position in that department. The position would also allow a floater position in city hall to back up the clerical staff throughout the building. Finance Department Supervisor Mueller said this would impact the numbers previously given by approximately $2,000 in the first year and the second year, it would be an additional $15,000 on top of the $40,000 so they’d be looking at $55,000. To include the half position back in the budget would be $13,500. Mayor Johnson added that the position would have to be negotiated with the Union. Ald. Fiedler brought up the subject of outsourcing Building Inspection and the $20,000 for the truck for the Parks and Recreation Department. He noted that there could be one of the Building Inspection’s trucks shifted to the parks thus an additional savings of $20,000. The decision of outsourcing IS and Building Inspection needs to have a serious discussion about it as it will not be getting any easier. If the city is going to outsource one department, he could not see the efficiency of bringing in a new IS department, teaching them the system, and then have another department leave the next year with a change in system, bring the two new departments in and they can work on the system together. Mayor Johnson stated there needs to be a lot of internal things that need to be done such as finance and computer interface, etc. to make it work. IS has a function with Building Inspection. The new company will be evaluating the current system and need some time to do the evaluation. He was in favor of staggering the changeover. Ald. Fielder inquired if the Building Inspection turnover was delayed until March, what would be the effect on savings the first year? Finance Director Mueller said it would be a quarter less, a loss. It would be a couple thousand. Ald Pavelko requested new sheets and amended expenditures. Ald. Werner cautioned that the city should do what’s right the first time and in the best interest of the city. NEW BUSINESS Debt Service Fund Finance Department Supervisor Mueller summarized the total debt service obligation for the city. The two funds to include the general debt which is supported by the tax levy Committee of the Whole Page 5 September 25, 2008 dollars and the CDA lease revenue which is generated from tax district #9 increments. For 2009, the combined principal/interest payments are projected to be increased by $245,000 over 9% over the 2008 budget. This was due to the issuance of the 2008 anticipation notes for the city’s new tax district #10, located off of Moorland Road. To help compensate for the future debt payments, funding sources from the special revenue fund and the water utility have been budgeted and will continue to budgeted until reimbursement for the related past debt obligations have been paid off. The net result of the projected fund activity should allow for a fund balance of 2.2 million dollars. This will be used as a partial offset against future debt obligations. She advised that the city’s total outstanding debt will be 24.1 million dollars as of December 31, 2009. The city has a debt limit of 109 million dollars as of the calendar year 2008. Special Revenue Funds Finance Department Supervisor Mueller explained that the special revenue funds which are basically to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for a specific purpose. All the funds combined totaled 11.5 million dollars at the end of 2009.  Park Dedication Fund is for improving the city’s parks and included with this fund is a department request for reimbursement of the Old Town Hall in the amount of $161,000. She noted that the Mayor has proposed to remove this $161,000 transfer. Mayor Johnson stated his position as whether you believe in that building or not, and in his opinion is a park property, administered by the Parks and Recreation Department and it is on park property and he believed it should come from funding through the park funds as opposed to using money from the general undesignated fund balance that could be used for other projects in the city such as roads like Durham Drive. He proposed to change the decision of the previous Council and allow that balance to be taken from park dedication money. Ald. Snead stated that at last year’s budget they discussed paying the money back that was borrowed from the fund and wanted to know why it wasn’t paid back. Mayor Johnson said they talked about it but took no action. Ald. Snead stated then park dedication is going to be out the money they loaned. Discussion continued on the park dedication funds that were used on the Old Town Hall and the agreement to pay the park dedication fund back. The item and documents on the subject will be reviewed at the next meeting.  Refuse & Recycling are fees that are charged to the residents for waste removal services. The city is proposing a rate increase quarterly of $5.90 or 28.64%. The projected net loss for 2008 is $37,409.34 in refuse and $21,614.41 in recycling. The two main reasons that the city is recognizing a loss is Veolia’s rates have increased by 53 cents/month/user due to the State’s new proposed fee and the second reason is the city is no longer receiving host fees from Waste Management as they have filled their contract obligations. For 2009, the net loss in refuse is projected at $133,396.92 and in recycling at $78,723.52. If the new rate is implemented, the increase in revenue will offset the increase in expenditure. She noted that the city is still negotiating with Veolia and if the rate changes significantly, this will be brought forward. Committee of the Whole Page 6 September 25, 2008  Revolving Loan is State funding that is available for loans to different city businesses and currently there are three participants—Alpha Plastics, Stella & Chewy’s and The Animal Doctor.  Emerald Park Fund reflects the administrative and committee related fees to monitor the landfill operations under the terms of the contract.  Cable TV Fund covers cable operating costs. She mentioned that revenues are no longer recognized because franchise fees are now reflected in the operating budget.  Landfill Fund generates revenue from hosts fees that are received from the landfill for actual tons of waste. For 2009, the city is projecting over 5 million dollar fund balance. Some of the funds may be used for future road projects.  Future Parkland Fund includes engineering fees for the oversight of the old Briggs and Stratton landfill.  Well Testing Reserve Fund is for covering the cost of testing private wells once the landfill closes.  Land Conservancy Fund is funding the city conservation and city forester and conservation intern are budgeted. In addition, purchases of land for conservation.  Storm Water funds strictly storm water related projects such as drainage ditches, construction of ponds.  Rescue fund covers expenditures related to the Tess Corners Ambulance Service operations.  Residual TIF/Capital Improvement is for past and present TIF district distributions of the closed districts #2-#7 and computer replacement.  Tax Districts #8 and #9 reflects the actual tax increment which will ultimate offset the debt obligation.  Grant is for grant funds and the expenditures which offset each other.  GIS includes computer costs to help GIS operations. She was advised by the Plan Director that the $18,000 expenditure should be moved to 2008. The start up funding came from operating from Council in 2005. Now the revenue is from maps or copies for the public.  Recreation Ticket Sales to the various theme parks.  Community Development funds expenses that are incurred by the Community Development Authority.  Compensated Absences Fund covers payments to terminated and retired employees for vacation and sick leave balances. The city is proposing to have future severance pay and early retirement expenses against this fund. It will require official approval from the Council. This is a fund the city is required to have by the Federal government. TID Budgets This is the capital projects fund for the tax district off of Moorland (#10). Shown on the budget is the anticipated notes with revenue coming in and the expenditures flowing out. It should net each other for a zero balance by the end of 2009. COMMUNICATIONS/MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS Next Meeting The next meeting will be October 2, 6:00 p.m., at the Stoney Creek Adult Community. Mayor Johnson cancelled the October 9 meeting as it conflicts with the DOT project Committee of the Whole Page 7 September 25, 2008 meeting. The October 2 will be finalization of the budget as the information has to be to th the press by the 9. Ald. Werner would like to see what the numbers are for outsourcing as he predicted a debate on this issue at the next meeting. Ald. Schaefer requested more of a summarization of the departments that they are thinking of outsourcing such as hours they will be here. Job Descriptions With the departure of the city administrator and some of the duties being done by the administrative assistant in the Mayor’s office, Ald. Werner would like to revisit that job description. Mayor Johnson added that at the next Council meeting he would have ready for their review the pay for performance plan, to show the cities that were looked at, and hopefully, the Council will make a decision on whether or not they will have a program. The study to determine the salary scales was held off depending on what direction the Council will take. If not the pay for performance, then they would have to go with a step increase plan. When they get to the plan the city is paying $9,000 for, they will get the job descriptions to modify and then that company will inform the city of the classifications. Janesville Road Project Ald. Pavelko shared the notice he received from the county on the Janesville Road project. They are going to extend the project to 2013; three years rather than two years. ADJOURNMENT Ald. Snead moved to adjourn at 8:17 p.m. Seconded by Ald. Fiedler, motion carried. Stella Dunahee, CPS Recording Secretary