pfcm19970115CITY OF MUSKEGO
POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MEETING AND ADJOURNED HEARING HELD JANUARY 15, 1997 as to
the In the Matter of Charges Dated the 18th day of November, 1996
Filed by Chief John Johnson, Complainant, Against Officer George
Mielke, Accused, and Served Upon Accused on the 19th day Of
November, 19 9 6 .
The meeting and adjourned hearing were called to order at 7:17 P.M.
by President Robert Kreuser. Also present were Commissioners
Richard Horn, Michael Kuwitzky, William Martin (arr. 7:30 P.M.) and
Blenda Treba; Atty. John Macy representing the Commission; Chief
John Johnson; Atty. John Drana representing the Chief; Officer
George Mielke; Court Reporter Gayle Pruefert; and, Clerk-Treas. Jean
Marenda.
Clerk-Treas. Marenda read the Notice of Meeting and Adjourned
Hearing of the Police and Fire Commission.
Atty. Drana distributed binders with marked tabs holding all
exhibits to be presented.
Chairman Kreuser stated the hearing was regarding charges filed
against Officer Mielke and offering him an opportunity to respond to
the charges in open session.
Chairman Kreuser announced, after conferring with the COmmiSSiOn,
that the meeting and hearing could proceed until midnight, at which
time they would adjourn to the following night.
Officer Mielke requested that all witnesses be sequestered. Atty.
Drana objected. After discussion, Atty. Drana withdrew objection
with the exception that Chief Johnson be allowed to stay. Chairman
Kreuser stated the request to have the witnesses sequestered was
granted.
Clerk-Treasurer Marenda read the Charges Against Officer George
Mielke dated November 18, 1996 by John R. Johnson. Commissioner
Martin arrived at 7:30 P.M. during the reading of the complaint.
Officer Mielke moved to dismiss all charges. Chairman Kreuser
stated the request was denied.
Atty. Drana presented his opening statement, and Officer Mielke
followed with his opening statement.
Atty. Drana called his first witness, Waukesha County Deputy Sheriff
Lamont Strandberg who was sworn in by the court reporter. Atty.
Drana proceeded with direct examination. Atty. Drana moved Exhibits
6 and 7 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
Chairman Kreuser accepted the exhibits. Witness was cross examined
by Officer Mielke. The witness was then excused for the night by
Atty. Drana, but witness was advised he was still under the force of
the subpoena.
Atty. Drana called his second witness, Waukesha County Deputy
Drana proceeded with direct examination, and then moved Exhibits 8
Sheriff Karen Stauss who was sworn in by the court reporter. Atty.
Chairman Kreuser noted the exhibits were accepted. Officer Mielke
and 9 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
night, noting she was still under the force of the subpoena.
cross examined the witness. Atty. Drana excused the witness for the
Police and Fire Commission
Minutes of Meeting and Hearing
The Commission took a short recess.
Page 2
January 15, 1997
Atty. Drana advised the Chief calls his third witness, Sgt. Grant
Turner of the Town of Mukwonago, who was sworn in by the court
reporter. Atty. Drana proceeded with direct examination, then moved
Chairman Kreuser advised the exhibit was accepted. Atty. Drana
Exhibit 10 into the record. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
moved Exhibit 12 in evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no
objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 12 into evidence.
witness.
Officer Mielke cross examined Sgt. Turner. Atty. Drana excused the
Atty. Drana advised Chief calls his fourth witness, Chief Anthony F.
Kemnitz, Town of Mukwonago, who was sworn in by the court reporter.
Mielke and redirect by Atty. Drana. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 11
Direct examination by Atty. Drana, cross examination by Officer
Kreuser accepted Exhibit 11 into evidence. The witness was excused
into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman
by Atty. Drana.
Atty. Drana called fifth witness Inspector Gary L. Paluszcyk of the
Waukesha County Sheriff's Department, who was sworn in by the court
reporter. Direct examination by Atty. Drana. Atty. Drana moved
Exhibit 21 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 20 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated
Chairman Kreuser stated Exhibit 21 was accepted into evidence.
Officer Mielke cross examined the witness.
"no objection". Chairman Kreuser stated Exhibit 20 was accepted.
Atty. Drana stated the Chief calls Lt. Paul Geiszler, Muskego Police
Department as sixth witness, who was sworn in by the court
reporter. Direct examination by Atty. Drana. Atty. Drana moved
Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 14 into evidence. Atty. Drana
Exhibit 14 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
asked Exhibit 15 be moved into the record. Officer Mielke stated
"no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 15 into
evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 16 into evidence. Officer
Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 16
Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 17
into evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 17 into evidence. Officer
into evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 18 into evidence. Officer
Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 18
Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 19
into evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 19 into evidence. Officer
into evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 23 into evidence. Officer
Mielke objected. Atty. Macy recommended the Commission note the
objection and accept the document for what it's worth. Chairman
Kreuser accepted Exhibit 23 noting the objection by Officer Mielke.
witness.
Officer Mielke cross examined Lt. Geiszler. Atty. Drana excused the
The Commission recessed.
The Commission returned to the hearing noting that Lt. G@iszler was
now present. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
Atty. Drana called Chief John Johnson, who was sworn in by the court
Exhibit 1 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no objection".
reporter. Direct examination by Atty. Drana. Atty. Drana moved
Police and Fire Commission
Minutes of Meeting and Hearing
Page 3
January 15, 1997
Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 1 into evidence. Atty. Drana
moved Exhibit 2 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated "no
objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 2 into evidence.
Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 3 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated
Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 4 into evidence. Officer Mielke stated
"no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 3 into evidence.
evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 5 into evidence. Officer
"no objections". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 4 into
Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 5
Mielke stated "no objection". Chairman Kreuser accepted Exhibit 22
into evidence. Atty. Drana moved Exhibit 22 into evidence. Officer
into evidence. Officer Mielke cross examined the witness. Officer
Mielke reserved his right to further examine Chief Johnson at a
the night due to the late hour. Chairman Kreuser stated at the
later date. Officer Mielke requested the hearing be concluded for
start of the hearing it was agreed to go to midnight.
Atty. Drana presented closing arguments.
Officer Mielke presented closing arguments.
Atty. Drana presented no rebuttal.
Atty. Macy presented to the Commission the procedures to be followed.
He noted that Exhibit 13 in the binder was not moved into evidence.
Atty. Drana acknowledged that was correct.
Mr. Martin moved to convene into Closed Session pursuant to
19.85(l)(a) Wis. Stats., Deliberating concerning a case which was
the subject of any judicial or quasi-judicial trial or hearing
before that governmental body, more specifically concerning the
matter of Charges Dated the 18th day of November, 1996, Filed by
Chief John Johnson, Complainant, Against Officer George Mielke,
Accused, and Served Upon Accused on the 19th day of November, 1996
and pursuant to 19.85(1)(g), Wis. Stats., To confer with legal
counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral or written
advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect to
litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved, more
specifically concerning the charges which are the subject matter of
this hearing. Mr. Horn seconded, motion carried by a roll call vote
of 5-0.
The Commission reconvened into Open Session. Mr. Horn moved to
motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 12:12 A.M.
adjourn until 7:OO P.M. on January 16, 1997. Mr. Kuwitzky seconded,
Respectfully submitted,
*K n K. Marenda, wd CMC
werk-Treasurer
A transcript of this meeting and hearing is available upon request.
CITY OF MUSKEGO
W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, Muskego, WI 53150
Phone - 679-4100
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
State of Wisconsin )
Waukesha County 1 1 ss
Lc/~uj-&p~~~ rJbfl,tl J >&E7 on oath says that on the 17
day of Thn/u,q~y , 1977, - has served the within
notice on G EO& GE E. /Y/E’L Kr‘ whom he knew to be
the person within named by delivering to and leaving with him a
true copy thereof.
/7,
Subscribed and sworn to before me this & day of JRPJVRA” , 199J.
Notarymblic
Waukeskd County, Wisconsin
My commission expires: - 5 -A -99
a CITY OF MUSKEGO POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
RESOLUTION # /-9 7
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS,
DETERMINATIONS AND ORDERS IN THE MATTER OF:
CHARGES DATED THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996,
FILED BY CHIEF JOHNSON, COMPLAINANT,
AGAINST OFFICER GEORGE MIELKE, ACCUSED
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of the City of Muskego Police and
Determinations and Orders in the Matter of Charges Dated the 18th
Fire Commission does hereby approve the attached Findings,
Against Officer George Mielke, Accused.
day of November, 1996, Filed by Chief John Johnson, Complainant,
DATED this /& day of 1997 U
POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO
/"-T W&//GG4/
ROBERT J. KRVSER, COMMISSION PRESIDENT
Pursuant to Section 62.13(5) (f), a copy of this Resolution with
Charges Dated the 18th day of November, 1996, Filed by Chief John
the attached Findings, Determinations and Orders in the Matter of
been filed with and received by the Secretary of the Board on the
Johnson, Complainant, Against Officer George Mielke, Accused, has
16th day of January, 1997.
POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
E CITY OF MUSKEGO /d/d COMMISSION w SECRETARY
CITY OF MUSKEGO POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
RESOLUTION # /-97
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS,
DETERMINATIONS AND ORDERS IN THE MATTER OF:
CHARGES DATED THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996,
FILED BY CHIEF JOHNSON, COMPLAINANT,
AGAINST OFFICER GEORGE MIELKE, ACCUSED
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of the City of Muskego Police and
Determinations and Orders in the Matter of Charges Dated the 18th
Fire Commission does hereby approve the attached Findings,
Against Officer George Mielke, Accused.
day of November, 1996, Filed by Chief John Johnson, Complainant,
DATED this /& day of , 1997
POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO
/-"7
4
ROBERT J. KRPSER, COMMISSION PRESIDENT
FINDINGS, DETERMINATIONS AND ORDERS OF THE
CITY OF MUSKEGO POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION
0
‘0
IN THE MATTER OF:
CHARGES DATED THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996,
FILED BY CHIEF JOHN JOHNSON, COMPLAINANT,
AGAINST OFFICER GEORGE MIELKE, ACCUSED
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. There was filed on November 18, 1996 with the City of
Muskego Police and Fire Commission a document entitled,
“Charges Against Officer George Mielke“.
2. Said charges were served upon George Mielke pursuant to
Wisconsin Statute §62.13(5) (d) on November 19, 1996.
3. Pursuant to Wisconsin Statute §62.13 (5) (d) , the Board
set a date for hearing not less than 10 days nor more
caused the same to be mailed to George Mielke on
than 30 days following the service of charges and
Mielke by leaving a copy of the notice with Debbie
November 25, 1996 and personally served upon George
Mielke on November 26, 1996. The date of said hearing
was set for December 10, 1996 at 7:30 p.m at the
Aldermen’s Room, Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine
Avenue, Muskego, Wisconsin.
4. A hearing was held at the Aldermen‘s Room, Muskego City
Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, Muskego, Wisconsin on
December 10, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. at which time the
accused appeared. At that time, the hearing was
adjourned at the request of George Mielke as he
indicated he needed additional time to prepare for the
hearing. George Mielke at that time also requested
that the hearing be delayed until the conclusion of any
was the subject matter of the hearing and said request
criminal proceedings growing out of the incident which
was denied. The hearing was adjourned until January
15, 1997 at 7:OO p.m. at the Muskego Room, Muskego City
Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, Muskego, Wisconsin and
further hearing dates were then and there scheduled for
January 16, 1997 and January 17, 1997 at 7:OO p.m. at
the Muskego Room, Muskego City Hall, W182 58200 Racine
Avenue, Muskego, Wisconsin if necessary.
5. A hearing was held at the Muskego Room, Muskego City
Hall, W182 58200 Racine Avenue, Muskego, Wisconsin on
January 15, 1997 at 7:OO p.m. and January 16, 1997 at
7:OO p.m. At the time of said hearing, the accused
witnesses, compel the attendance of witnesses by
appeared and each party had the opportunity to produce
subpoena, cross-examine witnesses and be reprzsented by
counsel.
6. The service of all notice requirements were made in a
timely manner.
7. Throughout the proceedings, the Chief of Police was
represented by the firm of Lindner & Marsack, S C.
8. Throughout the proceedings, George Mielks was not
represented by an attorney.
9. All Commissioners were present throughout the entire
proceedings other than Commissioner Mzrcin who appeared
on January 15, 1997 during the reading of the charges
and prior to any evidence being presentsd.
10. All Open Meeting Law requirements have been satisfied.
11. That prior to the hearing the following motions were
made :
A. George Mielke requested that witnesses be
originally objected, but then withdrew his
sequestered. Counsel for the Chief of Police
objection, other than a request that the Chief of
Police be allowed to remain at Counsel table
granted George Mielke's request for sequestration,
throughout the entire hearing. The Commission
of Police, left the hearing room.
in part, and all witnesses, other than the Chief
B. George Mielke made a motion to dismiss the
charges, which the Chairman denied.
12. The decision of the Commissioners was based solely on
evidence presented at the hearina, which included the
following:
A. Oral sworn testimony of:
Deputy Lamont Strandberg, Waukesha Councy
Sheriff ' s Department ;
Deputy Karen Strauss, Waukesha Cocnty Shriff's
Department;
Sgt. Grant Turner, Town of Mukwonago;
Chief Anthony Kemnitz, Town of Mu'kwonago;
-2-
Inspector Gary Paluszcyk, Waukesha County
Sheriff's Department;
Lt. Paul Geisler, City of Muskego; and
Chief John Johnson, City of Muskego.
9. Exhibits 1 through 12 and 14 through 23 were
Mielke objected to Exhibit 23. The Board received
received into evidence with one objection. George
Exhibit 23 subject to the objection.
13. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing and
the exhibits all referred to above, the Commission
finds the following facts:
A. Deputy Lamont Strandberg testified that, on the
night of incident in question, George Mielke was
yelling at him, he detected a strong odor of
intoxicants on George Mielke's breath, and noticed
Deputy Strandberg stated that whenever George
that George Mielke's speech was extremely slurred.
Mielke said something to him, George Mielke would
repeat it numerous times. Deputy Strandberg also
testified that whenever he said something to
George Mielke, George Mielke would repeat whatever
that, in his opinion, George Mielke was definitely
it was that was said. Deputy Strandberg stated
intoxicated.
Deputy Strandberg testified that George Mielke's
moods ranged from extremely argumentative and
agitated to a point where George Mielke was not
yelling or swearing, but less than totally
cooperative. Deputy Strandberg testified that
George Mielke flew into a fit of rage for no
several times throughout their conversations,
apparent reason
George Mielke told Deputy Strandberg that he
realizes that he has a drinking problem, but that
he does not need help. George Mielke also stated
to Deputy Strandberg that he is an alcoholic, but
that he does not want to take care of the problem,
Deputy Strandberg asked George Mielke if he ever
that he just needs to get out of his marriage.
George Mielke became very upset and said, fuck the
attempted counseling for his drinking problem, and
George Mielke was placed into the back of a squad
counselors. Deputy Strandberg testified that
car, and Deputy Strandberg watched him while
Deputies Strauss and Mech obtained a statement
-3-
0
from Debbie Mielke. During this time, George
Mielke again became extremely upset and told
Deputy Strandberg that the Oswalds were nothing
compared to him. George Mielke stated that he was
a Vietnam veteran and had SWAT training and that
he knows how to kill. George Mielke then stated
that he wanted Deputy Strandberg to know that if
was going to get hurt. Deputy Strandberg t,old
the officers came back to his residence, someone
George Mielke that George Mielke’s comments
sounded like threats to him, and George Mielke
way he wanted.
told Deputy Strandberg to take the comments any
Mielke told him several times that he was stressed
Deputy Strandberg further testified that George
to the limit and was about to crack and that when
that happened, Deputy Strandberg did not want to
be around him. George Mielke then told Deputy
Strandberg that with the vantage point he has from
his house, he could take anyone out at anytime.
Deputy Lamont Strandberg took these threatening
believe that George Mielke posed an actual threat
statements seriously and felt there was reason to
dispatched to the Mielke residence. Deputy
to the safety of any law enforcement officer
Strandberg felt there was reasonable basis to
conclude that Mielke’s statements meant that
Mielke has considered, or is considering, using
firearms against officers responding to his
residence in the future.
As a result of George Mielke‘s statements, Deputy
Strandberg wrote a report identifying these
concerns to his commanding officers.
Subsequently, the Waukesha County Sheriff‘s
Department and the town of Mukwonago Police
Warning‘ entry on their Computer Aided Dispatch
Department have included a ”threat to Officer
dispatched to the Mielke residence.
systems which will appear whenever personnel are
B. Referring to Deputy Karen Strauss, George Mielke
exclaimed to Deputy Strandberg, “Why is that
fucking bitch smoking?”
C. Testimony was had at the hearing that upon his
effect that he knew that the type of conduct
arrest, George Mielke made statements to the
described above could cost him his job.
-4- ,
D. That George Mielke‘s conduct immediately prior to
and while in custody was conduct unbecoming of an
Code). Though he was under suspension and thus
officer (§300.29 of the Department’s Penalty
off duty at the time, the arresting officers were
awars that George Mielke was a Muskego Police
Officer .
Y s. The Department has adopted Department Regulations
effective dated 11-1-92 which were admitted into
evidence and marked Exhibit 2; that Rule 300.29
was in full force and effect on October 3, 1996.
F. That George Mielke has received the following
progressive discipline:
1) A three (3) day suspension issued in August,
1989 for unsatisfactory performance.
2) An eight (8) day suspension issued in June,
1990 based upon an incident occurring on May
30, 1990 wherein George Mielke was observed
Mielke ran off the road causing property
off duty in an intoxicated condition; George
damage; George Mielke failed to report the
accident and left the scene on foot; and
George Mielke was issued a citation for
Waukesha County Sheriff‘s Department. The
leaving the scene of an accident by the
Mielke’s agreement to submit to alcohol
suspension was not served based upon George
assessment and treatment.
3) A fifteen (15) day suspension issued based on
an incident occurring on July 23, 1992
wherein George Mielke, who had been drinking
groped the buttocks of a young woman who knew
in a Town of Vernon tavern, fondled and
he was a City of Muskego police officer. The
sexual contact was without consent and over
the woman’s protest. When the woman and her
boyfriend left the tavern, George Mielke
followed them into the parking lot where he
called out to the boyfriend, “Are you going
to fuck her? If you‘re not going to fuck
her, I’ll fuck her.” All but four (4) days
of the suspension were waived conditioned
upon George Mielke’s agreement to subject to
psychiatric evaluation and treatment.
-5-
4) A one hundred eighty (180) day suspension
issued in August, 1996 based on two separate
wherein George Mielke made improper and
incidents which occurred on May 5, 1996
unwelcome sexual advances to Ms. Ann Wissing
at the Williams Supper Club and later at the
Club Durham in Muskego. These physical
contacts took the form of unwelcome kissing
and licking of the face, as well as fondling
and groping of the buttocks. George Mielke
was still serving this suspension at the time
of the latest incident on October 3, 1996.
G. That evidence was received at the hearing as to
George Mielke's overall service record as set
forth in Exhibit 22.
H. Officers of the City of Muskego Police Department
are made aware of the rules of the Department and
of the probable consequences of violation of the
same, in part, in that officers are given a copy
of the rules and instructed as to what the rules
are and the likely consequences of violation of
the same.
I. The following rule is reasonable in that:
Rule 300.29 generally requires officers to not
engage in conduct unbecoming an officer; and
This rule is reasonable and necessary, in part, to
maintain discipline within the Department, respect
maintain the good image of the Department with the
for the Department and its officers and to
general public.
J. The Chief, before filing the charges, caused to be
performed an investigation of whether or not
George Mielke violated the rules of the
Department, which investigation included taking
witness statements in a timely manner and
discussing the charges with the accused.
K. The Department made a fair and objective attempt
to perform the investigation in an objective and
fair manner and in a timely fashion and to obtain
information from all persons having information
concerning the alleged incidents.
L. The Chief did discover substantial evidence of
violation of Department Rule 300.29 through
investigation of the charges in question.
-6-
M. The Chief is applying said rules fairly and
reasonably and without discrimination in seeking
disciplinary action against George Mielke.
N. The filing of charges and the seeking to
discipline George Mielke reasonably relates to the
seriousness of the alleged violation set forth
above and to George Mielke's record of service
within the Department in that George Mielke has a
prior record of suspensions for misconduct
relating, in part, to alcohol abuse, sexual
harassment and violation of Department rules.
14. 3ursuant to the Open Meeting Law, at the close of the
public hearing, after meeting all statutory
requirements, the City of Muskego Police and Fire
Commission went into closed session pursuant to
Wisconsin Statute §19.85(1) (a) and §19.85(1) (g).
15. aftzr the closed session, the City of Muskego Police
and Fire Commission reconvened into open session to
take action as noticed.
16. In open session, the City of Muskego Police and Fire
Commission approved these Findings, Determinations and
Orders and filed the same with the Commission Secretary
within three (3) days of the conclusion of the hearing.
- DETERMINATIONS
Based upon the Findings of Fact stated above, the City of Muskego
Police and Fire Commission determines that there is just cause to
sustain the charges as stated in these Findings, Determinations
and Orders and makes the following determinations based upon the
standards 3s set forth in Wisconsin Statute 562.13, most
specifically (em).
1. The subordinate George Mielke could reasonably be
expected to have knowledge of the probable consequences
of his conduct; and
2 The rule which was violated by the subordinate George
Mielke are reasonable; and
3. Chief Johnson, before filing the charges against the
subordinate George Mielke, did make a reasonable effort
to discover whether George Mielke did violate the
rules; and
4 The effort described above in No. 3 was fair and
objective; and
-7-
5. Chief Johnson did discover substantial evidence that
George Mielke violated rules of the Department as
described in the charges; and
6. Chief Johnson did apply the rules fairly and without
discrimination against George Mielke; and
7. The proceedings and a proposal to discipline George
Mielke does relate to the seriousness of the alleged
violations and George Mielke's record of service.
ORDERS
Based upon the above stated Findings of Fact and Determinations,
the City of Muskego Police and Fire Commission Orders as follows:
1. That the charges set forth against George Mielke in the
marked Exhibit 1 alleging violation of Department Rule
complaint of the Chief dated November 18, 1996 and
300.29 have been proved and are sustained by the Board;
and
2. The charges as stated above in Number 1 have been
proved and sustained by the Board, the Board does
hereby order dismissal and removal from the Department.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO REVIEW
Any person suspended, reduced, suspended and reduced, or removed
by the Board may appeal from the Order of the Board to. the
Circuit Court by serving written notice of the appeal on the
secretary of the Board within 10 days after the Order is filed.
-8-