PCM19940104CITY OF MUSKEGO
PLAN COMMISSION
MINUTES OF PLAN COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 4, 1994
Mayor David DeAngelis called the meeting to order at 7:OOp.m.
PRESENT: Chairman David DeAngelis, Ald. Taube, Commissioners,
Raimann, Honl, Smith, Vitt, Hulbert and Director Matthew Sadowski.
ABSENT: None
MINUTES: Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the Minutes
of the December 21, 1993 Meeting. Commissioner Hulbert seconded.
Upon a voice vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS:
RESOLUTION XP.C.228-93 -- Approval of amended Building, Site
and Operation Plan by Michael A. Haessly for St. Francis Bank
located at 574 W17100 Janesville Road. Deferred from December 21,
time the petitioner is requesting that this be deferred to allow
1993 meeting. Chairman De Angelis explained that at the present
additional time to prepare the various designs. Commissioner
Hulbert made a motion to a defer, Ald. Taube seconded. Upon a
voice vote, Resolution #P.C. 228-93 passed unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA:
Two Sided Sign by Illumination, Inc. for Ameritech Building
RESOLUTION #P.C.Ol-94 -- Approval to Construct One Permanent
located on 575 W17425 Janesville Road. Ald. Taube made a motion
to adopt, Commissioner Raimann seconded. Upon a roll call vote,
Resolution #P.C. 01-94 passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION XP.C.02-94 -- Approval of Extraterritorial
Certified Survey Map for Two (2) Parcels by Interline Survey
Services, Inc. for the Scherbarth Property located in the SE 1/4
of Section 8, Town of Norway. Ald. Taube made a motion to adopt,
Commissioner Raimann seconded. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution
#P.C. 02-94 passed unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS :
RESOLUTION IP.C.03-94 -- Approval of Certified Survey Map of
Two Parcels by Metropolitan Engineering for Robert & Sandra
Hoormann located in the NW 1/4 of Section 10. (Janesville Road
and Bay Lane extension) Commissioner Honl made a motion to
adopt, Commissioner Smith seconded. Chairman De Angelis stated
affected by this land division. Director Sadowski indicated that
that the shared access between the two parcels will not be
this resolution should be amended by changing #2 of the THEREFORE
northern most 100'. After further conversation, Ald. Taube made a
BE IT RESOLVED to read ..... Bay Lane Drive Extension on the
Pg. 2 Plan Commission Minutes 01/04/94
motion to amend by changing #2 of the THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED to
read ..... Bay Lane Drive Extension on the northern most loo',,
Commissioner Vitt seconded. Upon a voice vote, the amendment
passed unanimously. Upon a roll call vote, amended Resolution
#P.C. 03-94 passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION ltP.C.04-94 -- Approval of Final Plat of Lakeview
Highlands North Subdivision in the SW 1/4 of Section 5 (Racine
Avenue). Commissioner Smith made a motion to adopt, Commissioner
Hulbert seconded. Director Sadowski reviewed and discussed the
questioned whether the grading and drainage plans take into
following items that were causing concern. Director Sadowski
account the quantity of additional storm water drainage to CTH "Y"
from this development. Director Sadowski was satisfied that this
was taken into account as the project engineer has submitted
appropriate information to the County Highway Department. Second:
there should be a notation placed on the face of the Final Plat
indicating that Lots 38 & 39 actual buildable area is decrease by
the floodplain therefore creating a decreased amount of square
the face of the Final Plat and in the deed restrictions indicating
footage for a building pad. Third: a note should be placed on
responsible for the maintenance of both the 30' planting easements
that the property owners in Lakeview Highlands North are
dedication along the stream for a green way path to the planned
as well as the outlots. Fourth: the Park Board would like
park. Fifth: restrict the access of lots 23, 18, 17, 7, 34 &
lots in question would have access off of other streets and it
39. These lots would not have access to Adrian Drive. All the
would allow for a safer thoroughfare. And that these lots have a
50' access restriction measured from Adrian Drive. Sixth: the
square footage of Lot 24 excluding the 60' access & drainage
concerned with the easement. The county questioned whether a
easement should be depicted on the Final Plat. The county is also
Although it would be a substandard intersection because of the
dedicated right-of-way would be appropriate for this location.
angle, it would be a dedicated right-of-way rather than an
easement. Director Sadowski also indicated that the Building
Department has expressed concern with the landscaping of the lift
station, said lift station should be aesthetically pleasing.
Another concern of the Building Department is the street name of
Highland Court. It is similar to another street, Highland Park
Drive, and should consider renaming the said court.
Mr. Will Hein, engineer from Jahnke & Jahnke, is very concerned
with the access restriction from Adrian Drive for Lots 23, 18, 17
& 7. Specifically lots 7 & 17. The topography of Lot 7 would
necessitate the driveway being from Adrian Drive. The current
proposed building pads for Lots 17, 18 and 23 are to face Adrian
Drive. The proposed homeowner should have some control over how
their house will sit. If the access is restricted on Lot 17 the
existing topography would not make for an ideal situation.
garage will have to be on the other side of the lot and the
restricted to the northern portion of the lot. Mr. Hein indicated
Director Sadowski questioned whether the access to Lot 7 could be
Pg. 3 Plan Commission Minutes 01/04/94
that the garage would have to be a basement entry garage,
Director Sadowski stated that his suggestion of restriction is not
a code requirement, but for public safety. Chairman De Angelis is
concerned with creating a poor situation for a homeowner in the
event that the restriction may create a driveway that could be
what would the concern be. Mr. Hein stated that if the house
under water at times. Commissioner Vitt asked if Lot 17 is higher
faced Adrian Drive, any water would tend to run down to the
driveway location creating an unsafe driveway. Commissioner
would be affected tremendously. Mr. Hein agreed that Lots 7 & 17
Raimann questioned whether Lots 7 & 17 are the only lots that
would be affected most greatly and that access restriction on Lots
the importance of public safety feels that it is important to
18 & 23 would be workable. Chairman De Angelis while recognizing
allow the homeowner to choose the location of the driveway.
Mr. Hein asked what the commissioners feelings were regarding 60'
access easement on Lot 24. He explained that this easement allows
for access to the remnant parcel still owned by Mr. Dawson. Mr.
Hein indicated that they did not intend to create a public street,
but an access for Mr. Dawson.
Ald. Taube feels that this should be a dedicated right-of-way.
Commissioners Hulbert & Vitt agreed noting that it would be a
substantial angle for an intersection. Chairman De Angelis asked
if the dedicated right-of-way will create an unbuildable parcel.
Mr. Hein indicated that it would be buildable, but the buildable
area would not be as large as with only the easement. All
commissioners were in agreement that it should be a dedicated
right-of-way instead of an easement.
Mr. Hein questioned the exact area the Park Board is interested
the meander line and the tree line along the creek. One of the
in. Commissioner Hulbert indicated that it is the area between
reasons is because this creek is a tributary to the Muskego
Lakes. Commissioner Hulbert asked if there is currently a
drainage pond in this area. Mr. Hein indicated yes. Commissioner
Hulbert did not feel it was the park boards intent to include the
dedication would include all of outlot 1 and part of outlot 2 from
area of the drainage pond. Director Sadowski stated that the
the creek to the meander line.
Chairman De Angelis asked if Mr. Hein is agreeable to all that has
been discussed and proposed by the commission. Mr. Hein indicated
that he will have to resubmit to the State, but has no objection
as long as the Plan Director can answer all of his questions prior
to the submittal. Additionally, mr. Hein stated he would grant
the City an extension on the review time.
Director Sadowski stated that this item will have to go in front
well is required. Mr. Eberhardt, engineer from Ruekert & Mielke,
of the Public Utilities meeting in to determine if a community
the DNR had given this development the direction to apply in mass
stated that at the last Public Utilities meeting Nancy Payne from
Pg. 4 Plan Commission Minutes 01/04/94
Meadows. Mr. Eberhardt also stated that the Public Utilities
for the individual wells for this subdivision as well as Lakewood
well.
committee did not direct the developers to apply for the community
Commissioner Honl made a motion to defer, Commissioner Hulbert
seconded. Upon a voice vote, Resolution #P.C. 04-94 passed
unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C.O5-94 -- Recommendation of the Plan
Commission on the Proposed Amendment to Chapter 14, Section 1.5
the Unnamed Tributary of the Muskego Canal located in the Plum
(2) of the Floodplain Zoning Ordinance for the Property area of
Creek East Subdivision. Commissioner Smith made a motion to
adopt, Commissioner Raimann seconded. Mr. Carity explained the
history of this property and the rezoning. Chairman De Angelis
asked if these are as-builts of the site. Mr. Klimeck indicated
that the drawings that were submitted were field certified and are
true and correct. Chairman De Angelis asked for a statement to be
added indicating that the submitted drawings are the as-builts.
Mr. Klimeck agreed.
agreed to send a letter to affected property owners indicating
In a related matter to the subdivision in general, the developers
that the bike paths will be installed in 1994. And that the
Waukesha County Register of Deeds if it is not noted on the Final
developers engineer will file an affidavit of correction with
be copied on said affidavit.
Plat that it is a Bike Path and Drainage Easement. The City will
Commissioner Vitt made a motion to amend the resolution be adding
the following language to the third (3rd) WHEREAS and to BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED, .... Department of Natural Resources and Federal
Emergency Management Agency. Commissioner Honl seconded. Upon
a voice vote, the amendment passed unanimously.
Upon a roll call vote, amended Resolution #P.C. 05-94 passed
unanimously.
RESOLUTION #P.C.O6-94 -- Recommendation of the Plan
Commission on the Proposed Amendment to Chapter 14, Section 1.5
(2) of the Floodplain Zoning Ordinance for the Property area of
the Unnamed Tributary of the Muskego Canal located in the Plum
Creek Addition #1 Subdivision. Commissioner Smith made a motion
to adopt, Commissioner Raimann seconded. Mr. Klimeck, engineer,
explained the rezoning petition. The retention pond in parcel 1
Creek Addition #l. It is also the intent to add an area to the
of the proposed rezoning will be for half of Plum Creek and Plum
Floodplain for compensation of the storage of water. It is not
currently shown on the petition, but the petitioners would like it
DNR regarding the revised location of the storage.
to be added. They are presently waiting for a response from the
Pg. 5 Plan Commission Minutes 01/04/94
Mr. Patch indicated that this compensating storage area still
allows for the recreational area; it adds to the area's aesthetic
value.
Director Sadowski stated that with the proposed addition to the
change is considered a substantial one. Chairman De Angelis felt
Floodplain a new public hearing may need to be scheduled if the
that it was necessary to get an opinion from the City Attorney
prior to deciding whether this change is substantial.
Commissioner Honl made a motion to amend the resolution by adding
the following language to the third (3rd) WHEREAS and to BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED, .... Department of Natural Resources and Federal
Emergency Management Agency. Commissioner Smith seconded. Upon
a voice vote, the amendment passed unanimously.
Upon a roll call vote, amended Resolution #P.C. 06-94 passed
unanimously.
Theodore Luedtke located at S91 W13723 Boxhorn Drive. Ald.
Taube made a motion to adopt, Commissioner Hulbert seconded.
Chairman De Angelis why the petitioner would be removing only one
of the numerous sheds. The one in front is for kids toys, the one
by the house has been there and is permanent and the third one
will be moved closer to the new barn. It houses small goats.
Chairman De Angelis asked if the petitioner is aware of the
restriction of number of livestock. Mr. Luedtke is aware of the
be a ridge light and a 1' overhang. The building will be brown
restriction. The building will not have any windows, there will
with tan trim and a tan roof. Commissioner Vitt asked if the
petitioner will be running a business out of this building. Mr.
Luedtke indicated that he would not. Director Sadowski asked if
the petitioner has changed his plans from what is submitted. Mr.
Luedtke indicated it has been revised. The access will be via a
gravel drive.
Director Sadowski stated that a site plan must be submitted giving
the well and septic location. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution
#P.C. 07-94 passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION tP.C.07-94 -- Approval of 26' x 27' Pole Barn for
Edward H. Lanke €i Jerry Schultz (JSE Electric) of Two Lots located
RESOLUTION #P.C.O8-94 -- Approval of Certified Survey Map
in the NE 1/4 of Section 17. Commissioner Hulbert made a motion
to adopt, Commissioner Smith seconded. Director Sadowski stated
that the buildings on both of the parcels needs to be shown
including the parking areas. Upon a roll call vote, Resolution
#P.C. 08-94 passed 6-0-1 with Ald. Taube abstaining because JSE
Electric is a customer of his.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
Commissioner Hulbert asked the status of Ronnie's Mobile Station.
Director Sadowski indicated that the owners have submitted a
Pg. 6 Plan Commission Minutes 01/04/94
petitioner for an amendment to their existing Conditional Use
Grant. Commissioner Hulbert asked that a legal opinion be
received prior to this meeting regarding this situation. Chairman
De Angelis stated that the Plan Commission has every right to deny
any request as long as there is justification. Commissioner Vitt
stated that if it is denied the reasons must be spelled out
exactly so that the Board of Appeals will understand.
Commissioner Vitt indicated that according to state code any
vehicles for sale must be on a paved area. Ald. Taube asked to
have a legal opinion regarding applying state standards even if
Angelis's opinion that the state codes can be applied through
they are not encompassed into the City code. It is Chairman De
the Building, Site and Operation Plan.
Chairman De Angelis thanked Commissioner Vitt for joining the Plan
Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Honl made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:00
p.m. Commissioner Smith seconded. Upon a voice vote, the motion
to adjourn passed unanimously.
a
0
0
submitted,
Recording Secreta4 /