PCM19890620PLAN COMMISSION
CITY OF MUSKET0
MINUTES OF PLAN COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON 6/70/89
Mayor Wayne Salentine called the meeting to order at 7:20 P.M.
Present: Chairman Wayne Salentine, Edward Raimann, Alderman
Hilt, Darl Honl, Dottie Rector, Jack Schmidt h Director Gerald
Lee.
Absent: Mr. Hulbert
MINUTES: Mr. Raimann moved to approve the minutes of June 6,
1989. Dottie Rector seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS :
APPROVAL OF 2ND GARAGE STRUCTURE- The recording
secretary read Resolution #P.C.102-89. Auproval of 2nd garap,e
structure. Alderman Hilt moved for adoption. Dottie Recto;
located on the SE corner, saying that it would be just another
seconded. Neighbors appeared opposing this structure to be
place to work on cars. Mr. Fischer stated that it would
definitely be just for cold storage. Tom Mazer, a neighbor 0 Grzegorski another neighbor was concerned with spray painting and
stated it would be an eye-sore having no approach. Judy
the fumes. Ron Walters, across the street said he has seen cars
coming in on flat-bed trucks. Rich Rodie another neighbor was
concerned because there are many children living in the area.
Mayor Salentine would like the Building Department to investigate
the complaints and also have the storage defined. Mr. Fischer
mentioned only a torch rig and a two horse air compressor. ( No
was questioned as to what equipment would be in the garage. He
motion was lost.
welding equipment) Jack Schmidt made a motion to defer--and the
Mr. Fischer stated he would be willing to sign papers regarding
the no power and no insulation in the garage. Total number of
outside. Two letters were received in opposition which are on
ten cars were discussed for the garages, with none to be kept
file also. Alderman Hilt made a motion to defer. Jack Schmidt
unanimously
seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to defer passed
VARIANCE IN WIDTH LOT 10-DE BACK The recording
secretary read Resolution P.C.BlO3-89 granting variance in width
for lot 10 in McLaughlin Subdivision. Mr. Honl made a motion to
adopt seconded by Dottie Rector. Mr.Christinsen inquired whether
the buildings will be torn down. The Mayor stated that if the
setbacks etc. were okay they could remain, however; Gerald P.Lee
of moving them. At that time Mr. Deback said he already made a
thought the buildings would be moved but wondered about the cost
commitment that the buildings would all come down. A motion was
made by Mr. Raimann to amend Resolution 103-89 adding that all
the granting of the 15%. but Gerald Lee stated that the 15% would
come down. Seconded by Mr.Hon1. There was some question as to
be needed because of the average width and that could only be
granted because of the existing buildings on the lot. Mr. Raimann
moved for adoption. Mr. Honl seconded. Upon a roll call vote
the motion to adopt passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP SECT.32 - The
recordine secretarv read Resolution #P.C.104-8Y approval Of
Certifiei Survey map for the NE 1/4 of Section 32, De Back
Jack Schmidt moved for adoption. Dottie Rector seconded.
Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously.
CONSTRUCTIOn OF AOUfI?TTN TO H-ST. - The recording
secretary read Resolution P.C.#105 - 89 - Approval of expansion
APPROVAL OF EXPANSION OF CONDITIONAL USE GRANT FOR
of conditional use grant for addition (18' x' 28' for S8O-Wl4401
Schultz Ln. (Hunter's Nest) Mr. Raimann moved for adoption,
seconded by Alderman Hilt. There was some discussion as to the
leveling of the 300' area because of concern of moving of dirt
around. Upon a roll-call vote the motion to adopt passed
unanimously.
APPROVAL OF SKETCH FOR 86 LOT SUBDIVISION SECTION 32
The recording secretary read Resolution P.C.#106-89 approval of
sketch for 86 lot subdivision in the NW 1/4 of Section 32- Irving & Pearl Haut. There was concern as to whether there would be 0 enough sewer available. Gerald P. Lee stated that the matter
would be going to the Sewer Utility meeting. Mayor Salentine
await the Park Board study and report. Mr. Dawes suggested that
said there was at this time lots of capacity. He also would
we take the $200.00 per lot and use it for other structures for the property. Mr. Christiansen mentioned that some type of
shelter was needed in the area. Alderman Sanders agreed with Ray
Christiansen that the money would be more advantageous. Jack
Schmidt stated they should submit a new sketch. Some concern was
Honl moved to defer. Jack Schmidt seconded. Upon a roll call
shown as to retention ponds whether permanent or temporary. Mr.
vote the motion to defer was passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF 3 LOT SUBDIVISION SECT. 7 - The recording
secretary read Resolution P.C.#lO/-89 approval of 3 lot
subdivsion (Lots 4, 5 h 6) in the SW llL-of Section 7 - L
Schwartz. Dottie Rector moved for adoption, seconded by Mr.
Honl. Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed
unanimously.
APPROVAL OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP IN SECTION 14 - The
certified survey map in the NW 1/4 of Section 14 - Gerald recording secretary read Resolution P.C.tl08-89 approval of
Kozey. Mr. Honl made a motion to adopt. Jack Schmidt
seconded. It was noted that the Resolution would be subject to
call vote the motion to adopt was passed unanimously.
the approval of the engineer and also the perc test. Upon a roll
APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY SIGN FOR WOODSIDE ESTATES The
recordinn secretarv read Resolution P.C #log-89 aooroval of
temporary sign for<Woodside Estates in the SW 1/4'bf Section 17
Bushberger. Mr. Raimann made a motion to adopt. Dottie Rector
seconded. The number of days for approval was discussed. Jack
Schmidt made a motion to amend the resolution to read six months
instead of 90 days. Aldermann Hilt seconded. Upon a roll call
vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP FOR SECTION 5 The
recording secretary read Resolution P.C.#110-89 approval of
certified survey map for SE 1/4 of Section 5 John L. Malchine
Mr. Schmidt made a motion to adopt. Dottie Rector seconded.
Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt was passed unanimously.
APPROVAL FINAL PLAT LAKE KEE NONG GA MONG - The
recordinn secretarv read Resolution P.C.Wll1-89 approval of final
plat Lake Kee Nong-Ga Mong Subdivision, Town of Nb;way
Alderman Hilt seconded. It was noted this is called Long Lake
Nielsen Madsen h Barber. Mr. Honl made a motion to adopt.
which is south of Denoon. Upon a roll call vote the motion to
adopt passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF 3 LOT SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 7 - The
recording secretary read Resolution #P.C. 112 -89 approval of 3
Schwartz. Alderman Hilt made a motion to adopt. Mr.Raimann
unanimously.
seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed
lot subdivision in the SW 1/4 of Section 7 - Lawrence A.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS:
for the gravel extraction. This would be the expansion to
include the former Knutowski land. We have also received the
check for $600.00 to cover the costs. A public hearing is set
for July 18, 1989 for the expansion of conditional use.
Gerald P.Lee stated that we have received the petition
Regarding the Blue Chip Committee. We have received
$5000.00 grant money for planning purposes.
Representatives from Heritage, Mr. Kurtz, Mr. Gaulka h
Mr. Tabbert introduced their ideas for starter homes for the City
with about 600 in the lower level. (lower level out of ground)
of Muskego. These are basically 960 sq. ft. on the first floor
They would prefer smaller lots having a 60 ft. frontage. Cost
for the 960 sq.ft. would be approximately $53,200 with the lower
level to be finished at a later date. All homes would have an
attached garage and sewer h water. Pictures were shown of some
of the homes already constructed. They noted that deed restrictions would be required for the subdivision. Name of the 0 building company would be Gardner Brothers Builders. Gerald P.
Lee stated the need for some good landscaping. Mr. Honl and
Alderman Hilt both agreed. If anyone would be interested there
is a model in Hartland. Dottie Rector said she would encourage
some smaller homes in the area. Mr. Honl suggested the need for
some good design.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane Winsor
Planning h Development Sec'y.
MANGIAMELE ASSOCIATES 1'1 .DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
11
June 18, 1985
PUNNING CONSULTANT'S REPORT
TO : City of hskego Planning Commission
FROM: Joe Mangiamele, City Planner
SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development, - hskego Lakes C.C. - Scott Krause
Rezoning proposal.
One of the basic purposes of a planning project review and of a planner's report
is to integrate new proposals, small and large alike into the overall planning
process of the comnity on an on-going basis. Changes in planning thoughts, in
attitudes, in the economy and in points-of-view eventually are reflected in the
of the community.
plans. These plana are designed to improve the quality of life of the members
A proposal not acceptable under certain conditions becomes attractive in other
circumstances because planning thoughts change with the accumlated co!munity
changing climate as developers become attuned to the plans and planning process
experience and development proposals. New proposals often evolve within this
of the community. It may be said, therefore, that the planning process is con-
a "golf course living envltonment" ie reviewed.
tinuous and interactive. It is within this contat that the proposal to develop
The specific purpose of this report is to assist the hskego City Planning Com-
bers in their decision-making process by carrying them through past plana and ex-
ission in deliberating the various aspects of the propoaal and in aiding the ma-
proposals have on the City of bskego are considered.
periences into today's situations. Then the implications that both the plans and
A. Location within the City and the Population significance:
First of all, the area proposed for development is a distance from the
center of the City and ita center of population. The site is generally to
City because Big hskego Lake forms a transportation barrior. It is easier tu
the Southeast of the City and not directly accessible from the North of the
get into Racine County and the City of Franklin than it is to get to the
City's library on the present road network.
Although a population of some 3000 that might result from this developent
is quite significant, concentrated in a far corner of the Citywith a certain
segregation from the rest of the City, even if just physical. this would
tend to operate against the need for centralization.
B. Revenue producing aspects VS. hnicipal costs:
New Planned Unit Developments tend to produce minimal costa rWUlting in
a general net surplue for the particular area, especially early On-
4450 NORTH LAKE DRIVE * MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53211 * PHONE (414) 964-0763 OR 964-3344
Page 2.
The open space, in this case largely consists of the golf course
itself and therefore does not present any cost to the City. As
to bediscussed when details of the plan are reviewed.
to whether thiabsadequate reserve for public space is a question
A new road system will require minimal maintenance cost during the
will be at the average cost rate.
early years, although regular street cleaning and snow removal
Police and fire services would be on the same basis as throughout
the City, although enlargement or additional facilities might be
required as well as personnel.
As proposed, sewer linkage costs would be the responsibility of the
would become a City responsibility if this system were dedicated to
development--servicing of pumping station facilities and the system
the City.
Cost sumary: Although only a few of the total cosm are pointed
out here, it is expected that during the first 15 to 20 years, that
the revenue produced will exceed the service cost. Not all the tax
will be used for the expenses in the same manner as that of existing
go back into its own maintenance-in later yearsmost of the revenue
development of the City.
$$b\ revenue produced by the development will be a surplus as some must
C. Sewer Linkage:
Linkage with the City of Franklin is an innovative concept--this
of course will require a great deal of coordinated planning by a
a number of agencies which is possible and not as difficult as
getting a man on the mono Discussion with various agencies by
the planner indicates that positive attitudspervail.
Up-front costs will be born by the development as indicated in the
proposal; however, it may be 15 to 20 years before maximum use of
imate development of the project. Maxinnrm efficiency may not be
the facilities are attained--depending on the economy and the ult-
achieved for a much longer time. Therefore. there is more than an
up-front cost related to the installation of such a system.
It is possible that the burden of such a sewer system may have an ,e ’ effect on the potential success of the proposed development.
A population potential of some 3000 in a semi-rurual area even on
like those that faced the development of new tams although not at
the fringe of a large metropolitan area has many problem not un-
the scale of Reston Virgina or Colebia Maryland.
Although this is a private project and a novel one, the responsibil-
private developer but also become those of the City of kskego. For
ities of its development, once approved are not only those of the
the City becomes a real partner, not only in sharing responsibilities
”
DISICN AND DtVtlOPMtHl StRVIClS
Page 3.
pending on the success of the development for their payment.
for services but in providing for some of the services and de-
Up to this point, the City Planner's responsibility has been one of point-
ing out some of the obvious and not-so obvious planning components and some
of the conrmunity impacts of the proposed development. It is now necessary
to look at the integrating aspects of the proposals, i.e. where it all fits
into the total planning approach to the development of the City of hskego,
The City of hskego is'an unusual type of city in many ways. First of all,
it is about six by six miles in size--much larger in area than West Bend,
for example but much smaller in population. The City is not a compact city
and distances are greater than normally expected in small cities. kskego
is still to develop an easily identifible social or comrmnity centrality.
Even nearby shopping centers detract from the development of a central
nucleus, as the pull of these centers with variety services contribute to
the de-centralizing effect and a spreading of the city greater than normally
experienced.
standpoint of its centralizing and de-centralizing effect. To operationalize
Therefore, the City of hskego must view this proposal principally from the
presents toward attaining the goals and objectives of good city development,
the energic economic force that the existing country club and its management
it becomes necessary for the City to think in terms of a larger community
outcome. The proposal is an important one and the City Planning Conrmission
members must think beyond the boundaries of this particular ownership.
&A broader area of development, perhaps as far West as Kelsey Drive, North of
Highway 36. as far East as Highway 00 and as far North as Ryan Road or Boxhorn
Drive should be considered as a possible area of development and of sewer
service. This larger area would have an unmistakable integrating effect with
Lake as an important recreational living and environmental area. This wouldbe
the rest of hskego. It could also assist in the development Of Big 'kskego
a comnity project that would attract economic activity beyond that envisaged
by the present proposed project.
broader commnity integration and centralization. If the City is to become
It would operate against dividing the city and by its mere size would work toward
a partner in a large project, it is more justifible if it is a colrmunity-wide
project that works toward improving the quality of life of the scomnity.
Roper development distances can be maintained from Big hskego Lake and per-
haps recreational hotels can attract people as far as Chicago as does Olympia
in Oconomwoc. This could be much mre attractive with greater net revenue ad-
vantages than that of the smaller proposal.
RECOmATIONS :
mitted significant development South and Southeast of Big hskego Lake. The
Because of the City's size, it is unreasonable to expect the City not tobe per-
fact that this type of proposal comes before the City is evidence of the econ-
omic viability of this section of the City. In fact, this type of development
was envisaged for the City almost 20 years ago when the hskego Lakes C.C. was
approved. The fact that it Beem possible to develop this sewer system as MANGIAMELE ASSOCIATES
I- I DESIGN AND DEVKOPMENI SIRVICES
/
;/ /&
/
Page 4.
proposed should provide the City of Mrskego the sthlation to consider this
larger projected development plan. It is obvious that some detailed planning
work will have to be done, i.e. soil conditions, water tables, tarffic feas-
ibility and potential development possibilities. However, it appears that
this proposal will open a window to a larger cormunity plan. If this
development were to come about, it would be large enough in size to more
closely relate it the rest of the City and even to plan toward a centralized
activity area.
Within this frame of thought therefore, it is recommended that the City Plann-
lng Commission approvethis proposal in concept as part of a larger community
lan and development concept.-
oing, itls further recommended that the City of ELskego request that
repare for a meeting of the various agencies that will have to be-
his sewer system.
lvedinchanging the plans and granting the permission for the extens-
snwhtle, the City should move as rapidly as possible in developing the larger
oncept plan so that an area of future development can be designated, with
anticipated types of uses and even suggested road systems. A sewer llnkaga
with the capacity of that needed for the Mrskego Lakes C.C. proposal should be
considered as approximately one-third of the total capacity needed.
This concept should be presented at the first meeting at SmpC and the City
should seek suggestions as to how this can best be accomplished and the type
of staging that would be required. As the City necessarily needs to participate
in sewer extension to the extent that ibin a sense becomes a partner in the
project, the City should become partner with a number of developers who will
assist the City in becoming the type of comnity it wantsto become.
If the City does not wsnt to consider this broader possibility, it can still
act favorably on the specific proposal of Mrskego Lakes C.C. by approving
However, it must be kept in mind, that once the sewer capacity is detemined
the general conceptad requesting SEWRR: to arrange the appropirate meeting.
and approved that chances for development beyond this proposal will bexe-
cluded for decades to come.
c_ /
submitted, alv the general concept should be accepted, leaving the details
In any case, if the Planning Commission approves the proposed concept, as
for review. Although s specific sewer-Lty must be sought, the developer
can not.be assured any sewer hook ups until all the details are arranged.
In other words, none of the details of the,concept other than the type of
development is being Considered.
Inspite of the fact, that the city planner has concerns about permitting only
sewer-linked development in this area for many years to come leads him to
this particular property to develop in this area, the likelihood of precluding
recommend seeking sewer extension, especially as the existing country
club appears to provide a good -his reques t
-
~
"
/
J.F. Mangiamele MANNAME ASSOCIATES
DlSlGN AND DlVIlOPMlNI SERVICIS