PCM19661206CITY PLAN COMMISSION a CITY OF MUSKEG0 - MINUTES OF MEETING HELD DECEMBER 6, 1 966 CITY HALL
MAYOR GOTTFRIED CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 8:05 P. M.
PRESENT: MAYOR JEROME GOTTFRIED, CHAIRMAN, WILLIA~ F. CHASE,
RAIMANN. PLAN CONSULTANT RUSSELL KNETZGER AND BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE WERE ALSO PRESENT.
SECRETARY, CHARLES BUEHLER, ALD. s. ROBERT LENTINI AND ED
ABSENT: WILLARD BERTRAM
MINUTES: THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING, NOVEMBER 15,
1966, WERE APPROVED AS MAILED.
ARL POSBRIG - MR. POSERIG DID NOT APPEAR IN REGARD TO
HIS iEQUEST' FOR 2.5 ACRE LAND DIVISION IN THE NE#, SECTION 29.
JEROME DRUG$ - MAYOR GOTTFRIED RELINQUISHED THE CHAIR TO MR. CHASE DURING THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING. THE RECORDING SECRETARY READ THE FOLLOWING REPORT FROM JAHNKE AND JAHNKE, DATED DECEMBER 2, 1966, ANSWERING OBJECTIONS
TO THE PROPOSED DRUG STORE TO BE LOCATED ON HIWAY 24 WHICH
WERE RAISED BY PARKLAND P~ZA AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING. (SEE
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 1966)
It ON NOPEMBER 1, 1966, I REVIEWED THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR
JEROME DRUGS' NEW BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
S. T. H. 24" ABOUT 842.5 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF w. LANNON DRIVE. IN THAT REPORT WE NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN
DID NOT CONFORM TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS IN NUMEROUS
ALSO, THAT THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE OF THE BUILDING COULD BE
MEETING, THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THE PRO-
POSED DEVELOPMENT CONFORM TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ADD THE
VENEER TO THE EAST AND NORTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING IN ADDITION
It
INSTANCES RELATING TO PARKING, REQUIRED YARDS, AND LAND AREA.
IMPROVED WITH MASONRY VENEER ON TWO OR THREE SIDES. AT THAT
TO TEE FRONT.
ON NOVEMBER 15, 1966, A REVISED PLAN PREPARED BY DEQUARDO
& CROUCH ASSOCIATES, INC. WAS SUBMITTE?~ TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGO. THESE PLANS WERE LABELED "~-1~~ AND "A-2 , AND IN GENERAL,
ATTEMPT TO SATISFY THE OBJECTIONS RAISED AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING. @ PARKLAND PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER SUBMITTED A LENGTHY LETTER OF
OBJECTION TO THE REVISED PLAN. FOLLOWING ARE COMHENTS RELATING
TO BOTH THE REVISED PLAN FOR JEROME DRUGS AND THE LETTER OF
OBJECTION FROM PARKLAND PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER.
PAGE 2 - PLAN COXK.
DECEKBER 6, 1966
A DISCUSSION WITH RUSSELL KNETZ~ER OF NELSON & ASSOCIATES, MUSKEGO PLANNING CONSULTANT, LED TO THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS
RELATING TO THE PROVISIONS AND INTENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
1. THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGULATES ONLY THE NUHBER OF SINGLE
FAkILr RESIDENCES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RESTRICT THE NUKBER
OF BUILDINGS ON ONE PARCEL WITHIN THE B-4 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT.
VISED JEROKE DRUGS SITE PLAN CAN BE CONSIDERED AS ONE ENTITY
3. THE 30,000 SQUARE FEET REQUIREKENT WOULD APPLY TO THE
2. CONSEQUENTLY, THE ENTIRE PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN ON THE RE-
EVEN THOUGH TWO BUILDINGS WOULD EXIST ON THE PROPERTY.
PARCEL EVEN THOUGH TWO BUILDINGS EXIST. THIS IS DOUBLE THE
15,000 SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA REQUIRED IF SANITARY SEWER IS
AVAILABLE. 4. A GENERAL POLICY HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED THAT KASONRY
VENEER SHOULD BE PLANNED FOR ALL SIDES OF A BUILDING OPEN TO
VIEW Br THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
KITH THESE FACTORS IN KIND, THE FOLLOWING SUKKARY HAS BEEN
PREPARED:
CRITERIA ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT
e 1. MINIKUK LAND AREA 30,000 SQ. FT.
2. MINIKUM AVERAGE WIDTH 150 FEET
PROVIDED IN SITE PLAN
4541 2.5 SQ. FT.
262.5 FEET
3. MINIKUK SETBACK 30 FEET 20.5 ' (EXISTING (40 PLUS 20.5 BUILDING)
DIVIDED Br 2) 30' (PROPOSED BLDG )
4. FLOOR AREA RATIO 30%
5. HINIKUM OFFSET
A. ONE SIDE 10 FEET
B. ALL OTHER SIDES 1.5 FEET
24% (BOTH EXISTING
6c PROPOSED BLDGS.
10 FEET 15.4 (YEST OF
EXISTING BLDG)
25' (REAR OF
PROPOSED BLDG. )
6. OFF-STREET PARKING 1 SPACE/150 SQ. FT. (68) 58 SHOWN PFA OR 6.5* PLUS 10 CREDIT
FOR 60' EASEKENT
WEST OF PARCEL e *BASED ON A PFA OF 6600 SQUARE FEET FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING (44 STALLS) AND PFA OF 31 20 SQUARE FEET (80 PER CENT OF THE
STALLS). THIS WOULD BE A HIGH PFA AND PAEKING REQUIREKENT FOR
TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR THE EXISTING BUILDING (21
THE EXISTING BUILDING. THE 5a STALL PARRING AS SHOWN ON THE
PAGE 3 - PLAN COMM. DECEMBER 6, 1966
SITE SHOULD BE ADEQUATE WITH THE 10 ADDITIONAL PARKING
STALLS ON THE 60 FEET XASEMENT TO THE WEST AS A SAFETY FACTOR.
MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS:
1. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL: THE REVISED PLAN INDICATES A STONE
VENEER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AND A BRICK VENEER
ON THE EAST SIDE. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE FROM THE
OTHER TWO SIDES. HOWEVER, IT MIGHT BE DESIRABLE TO REQUIRE A
VENEER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING SINCE THIS SIDE WILL
BE EASILY VIEWED FROM THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER. THIS
SHOULD BE DECIDED BASED ON LOCAL PoLIcr. TEE WEST SIDE IS
DRAWING WHETHER OR NOT A KASONRY VENEER IS PROPOSED FOR THE
PROPOSED AS A FUTURE COMMON WALL, AND, THEREFORE, COULD BE
CONSTRUCTED OF CONCRETE BLOCK WHICH IS PAINTED TO IMPROVE
ITS APPEARANCE. THE FINAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF THE BUI
IS ALSO A LOCAL DECISION.
LD ING
2. HIGHWAY ACCESS: Two DRIVEWAY OPENINGS ARE SHOWN ONTO S. T.H. "24". HOWEVER, ONE OF THESE WILL NO LONGER BE REQUIRED
AFTER THE FUTURE EXPANSION HAS BEEN BUILT. CONSEQUENTLY, IT
IF ONE WOULD BE ADEQUATE AFTER THE ADDITION HAS. BEEN BUILT,
DOE8 NOT dPPEAR DESIRABLE TO ALLOW TWO DRIVEWAYS AT THIS TIME.
THEN ONE SHOULD BE ADEQUATE NOW.
3. OFF-STREET PARKING: THE PARKING STALL^ ARE DESIGNED 8'
WIDE AND 18' IN LENGTH. HOWEVER, SINCE THE OVERALL WIDTH OF
CONSIDERED TO BE 0' WIDE BY 20 FEET IN DEPTH. THIS KEETS THE
THE PARKING AREAS MEET ACCEPTED STANDARDS, THE STALLS CAN BE
ZONING ORDINANCE DEFINITION OF 160 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. IT
SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE TREND HAS BEEN TO CONSIDER THE MINIMUM
WIDTH OF A PARKING STALL, ESPECIALLY FOR THE 90 DEGREE PARKING
SHOWN, AS 9'. A ZONING ORDINANCE AKENDKENT, PREFERABLY, OR A
POLICY DECISION TO INCLUDE A KINIMUM WIDTH WITH THE TOTAL AREA
WOULD AID ANALYSES OF OFF-STREET PARKING. LACKING THIS WIDTH
REQUIREMENT, THE PARKING AS SHOWN MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR
WIDTH. THE WIDER 9' WOULD RESULT IN THE LOSS OF ABOUT 8 STALL5
BUT WOULD MORE NEARLY INDICATE THE ACTUAL USE PATTERN THAT WILL
DEVELOP. SLIGHT EXTENSIONS OR SHIFTS OF THE PARKING TIERS AS
SHOWN COULD RESULT IN PICKING UP SOKE OF THESE 8 STALLS AND STILL
PROVIDE THE WIDER 9 FEET STALL WIDTH. 4. LANDSCAPING: LANDSCAPING AREAS AND PLANTING PLANS
SHOULD BE SUBKITTED. THE GENERAL AREAS SHOWN MEET OR EXCEED
THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. 5. w: THE FUTURE SIGN IS SHOWN WITH~N THE FUTURE
WIDENED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR S. T. H. "24''. SECTION 6.10 ( 2 1, SETBACKS AND OFFSETS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, STATES THAT NO
EXISTING ST~EET LINE OR ANY OTHER LOT LINE". THE "EXISTING
/I
SIGN.. . .. .SHALL BE PERMITTED CLOSER THAN 10 FEET TO THE
STREET LINE APPARENTLY KEANS THE FUTURE WIDENED RIGHT-OF-WAY
PAGE 4- PLAN CONN. DECENBER 6, 1966 e
LINE BASED ON OUR DISCUSSIONS AT THE PREVIOUS MEETIEJG. THEREFORE, THE SIGN SHOULD BE RELOCATED 10 FEET FROH THE
WIDENED RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN SONE CASES, THE BOARD OF APPEALS AL-
MENT IS FILED WITH THE CITY TO GUARANTEE THAT THE SIGN WILL BE
RELOCATED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE CITY OR STATE AT SUCH TINE AS
THE CITY OR STATE REQUESTS THIS RELOCATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUC- TION.THE TINE' TABLE ON INPROVING THE HIGHWAY WOULD CONTROL THE
LOWS SIGNS WITHIN THE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED AN AGREE-
MERITS OF THIS APPROACH.
6. LIGHTING: LIGHTING SHOULD BE CONTROLLED AS TO LOCATION=
7. SANITATION FACILITIES: PROOF HAS TO BE SUBNITTED TO
STYLE, TYPE OF FIXTURE AND REFLECTOR, HEIGHT, ETC.
THE CITY THAT THE SANITATION PROBLEKS CAN' BE SAFELY FHANDLYPD
ON THE SITE BEFORE THIS BUILDING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED.
CONCLUSIONS: THE REVISED PLAN KEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ~ ~~
ORDINANCE BASED ON ASSUNPTIONS MADE IN THIS REPORT AND SHOULD
RESULT IN A BENEFICIAL DEVELOPHENT TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGO.
ANOTHER, AND POSSIBLY BETTER SOLUTION, WOULD BE TO INCORPORATE
THIS BUILDING INTO THE OVERALL SHOPPING CENTER CONPLEX, BUT THIS
IS A DECISION WHICH HAS TO BE MADE BY THE PARTIES INVOLVED. ,I THIS REPORT CONSIDERS ONLY THE PARCEL SHOWN ON DRAWING "A-1 .
C AT CENTEL: MR. RICHARD HIPPENNEYER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CITr OF MUSKEGO,
HAS REVIEWED THESE OBJECTIONS WITH NE. NEITHER OF us FELT THAT
THE CITY PLAN CONNISSION FRON REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS FOR JERONE DRUGS. WE CONCLUDED, AND THESE CONCLUSIONS WERE LATER
CONFIRHED BY MR. KNETZGER, THAT:
THE OBJECTIONS WERE VALID TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY SHOULD DETER
1. THE REPEATED REFERENCE TO A MINIHUFI LOT SIZE OF 60,000
2. AN ADDITIONAL BUILDING COULD BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE
WERE NET. THE NININUN LOT SIZE AND LOT WIDTH REQUIRENENTS ARE
SQUARE FEET IS IN ERROR WITH THE 30,000 SQUARE FEET APPLYING.
PARCEL PROVIDED OFF-STREET PARKING, SETBACKS, OFFSETS, ETC.,
TO BE NET BY THE PARCEL INVOLVED BUT NOT BY EACH BUILDING.
3. THE REFERENCE TO SECTION 6.01 (2)E 1, 2 AND 3, SANITATION
AND VATER SUPPLY, IS POSSIBLY VALID. HOWEVER, IF PROOF IS
SUPPLY AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE CAN BE PROVIDED, THE CITY COULD
PERKIT CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDINGS. IF THE CITY ATTORNEY FELT
IT TO BE NECESSARY, THE BOARD OF APPEALS COULD JUSTIFY A VA~NCE
SUBNITTED TO VERIFY THAT SAFE AND ADEQUATE FACILITIES FOR WATER
TO THESE PROVISIONS. MR. KNETZGER INDICATED HIS OPINION THAT
THESE RESTRICTIONS WERE INTENDED TO COVER RESIDENTIAL USES ONLY
AND NOT CONHERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, PLANNED DEVELOPNENTS;',
ETC. IF A STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THESE PROVISIONS WERE NADE,
THE CITY COULD NOT APPROVE NORE THAN ONE BUILDING FOR THE
PAGE 5 - PLAN COKK. DECEKBER 6, 1966
PROPOSED PARKLAND PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER UNTIL KDNICIPAL
SANITARY SEmR HAS BEEN PROVIDED. CONSEQUENTLY, IT BECOKES
APPARENT THAT SONE FLEXIBILITY HAS 90 BE AVAILABLE TO ALLOW
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES. THE LONG DELAYS WHICH HAVE AFFECTED
PROBABLY NOT ANTICIPATED AT THE TIME THE ZONING ORDINANCE WAS
DEVELOPKENTS WHICH CAN PROVIDE SAFE AND ADEQUATE WATER AND
ATTEKPTS TO INSTALL NUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES WERE
DRAFTED. 4. NO REZONING OF THE PARCEL INVOLVED SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
FORE, CONNENTS RELATING TO ZONING CHANGES REQUIRE NO ADDITIONAL
COKKENTS.
SINCE PERNISSION CAN BE GIVEN UNDER EXISTING B-4 ZONING. THERE-
5. COKNENTS RELATING TO RON-CONFORKING STRUCTURES ARE NOT
REVISED SITE PLAN AS SUBKITTED WITHOUT CONCERN REGARDING THE
AFTER REVIEW, THATANY VARIANCES ARE REQUIRED, THE BOARD OF
OBJECTIONS BY PARKLAND PLAZA. IF THE CITY ATTORNEY RECOKKENDS,
APPEALS COULD RESOLVE THESE FACETS GIVING DUE REGARD TO PLAN COKKISSION RECONKENDATIONS. IF NEEDED, I CAN KEET WITH THE PLAN COKNISSION ON THIS HATTER.
/s/ JOHN W. JAHNKE
PLANNING CONSULTANT"
MR. BUEHLER QUESTIONED THE USE OF THE WORD BUILDINGS"
CONSTRUCT KORE,,THAN ONE~~BUILDING. MAYOR GOTTFRIED ANSWERED
SEVERAL POINTS WERE REVIEWED BY ,,THE COKNISSION REFERRIIIG
TO THAT PORTION OF THE REPORT UNDER MISCELLANEOUS COKKENTS :
It
USED THROUGHOUT THE REPORT QUESTIONING IF THE INTENT WAS TO
THAT THE WORD BUILDING SHOULD HAI'E BEEN USED IN THE REPORT.
1. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL - IT WAS THE COKKISSION'S OPINION
THAT IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE TO REQUIRE TREATNENT ON THE REAR
WALL OF THE PROPOSED DRUG STORE WHICH WOULD CONPLIKENT THE PARKLAND PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER.
AS TO ONE ACCESS vs. TWO ACCESSES FOR THIS PROPERTY, ALDERNAN LENTINI AND PLANNER KNETZGER SPEAKING IN FAVOR OF ONE ACCESS. MAYOR GOTTFRIED ADVISED THAT HE WAS NOT IN AGREEKENT WITH THE
DRIVEWAYS UNTIL SUCH A TINE AS ONE WOULD NOT BE NEEDED. MR. BUEHLER POINTED OUT THAT THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN PURCHASED WITH
FAIR TO THE BUYER. HE ALSO POINTED OUT THAT TWO ACCESSES
2. HIGHWAY ACCESSES - THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION
ONE ACCESS REQUIREMENT, THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE TWO
TWO ACCESSES AND THAT ONE ACCESS AS SUGGESTED WOULD NOT BE
CREATE AN EASIER FLOW OF TRAFFIC.
3. OFF- EET PARKING - THE ONLY CONKENT ON THIS PORTION
WAS MADE BY ;ENNER KNETZGER WHO SUGGESTED KOVING THE ROW OF
PARKING SPACES ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO THE OPPO-
SITE SIDE FROK THE SUILDING SO THAT SHRUBS OR BUSHES COULD
BE PLANTED ALONG THE BUILDING.
PAGE 6 - PLAN COHH. DECEHBER 6, 1966
4. LANDSCAPING - PLANS TO BE SUBNITTED. 5. SIGN - BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE POINTED OUT THAT THERE
HAD BEEN AN AHENDHENT TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE OF WHICH JAHNKE
& JAHNKE WERE EVIDENTLY UNAWARE - THAT A SIGN IN A BUSINESS
DIST%ICT CAN BE CONSTRUCT,ED UP TO THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY ,
NOT FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY AS INDICATED IN THE REPORT. MAYOR GOTTFRIED REFERRED TO HIS LETTER OF NOVEHBER 14, 1966, DIRECTED
TO THE PLAN COHHISSION (A COPY OF WHICH WAS FORWARDED TO THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPT. ) IN WHICH HE AGREED TO REHOVE THE SIGN AT
NO EXPENSE TO THE CITY, COUNTY OR STATE IN THE EVENT IT HAD
RECORDED IN THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 1966)
6. LIGHTING - PLANS TO BE SUBHITTED.
7. SANITATION FACILITIES - MAYOR GOTTFRIED REFERRED TO
THE PERCOLATION TESTS RECEIVED BY THE COHHISSION NOVENBER 1,
AND EAST SIDE OF THE PARCEL. MAYOR GOTTFRIED ALSO REFERRED
THE LEACH BED WOULD BE NOVED IN THE EVENT THAT HIWAY 24 IS
THE PROPOSED LEACH BED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE CITY, COUNTY OR STATE. BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE POINTED OUT THAT COMMERCIAL
LEACH BEDS ARE APPROVED BY THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH AND THAT
THE BOARD OF APPEALS WOULD HAVE NO JURISDICTION OVER THIS.
PLANS OF JEROME DRUGS AS SUBHITTED NOVEHBER 15, 1966, SUBJECT
TO COMPLIANCE WITH ITEMS 4, LANDSCAPING, AND 6, LIGHTING, AS
INDICATED ON PAGE 3 OF THE REPORT FROH JAHNKE & JAHNKE DATED
II
TO BE RELOCATED WHEN THE HIGHWAY I5 WIDENED. (THIS LETTER
1966, WHICH HAD INDICATED A GOOD LEACH BED AREA ON THE FRONT
TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED LETTER IN WHICH HE ALSO INDICATED THAT
WIDENED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT WOULD AFFECT THE OPERATION OF
MR. BUEHLER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REVISED SITE AND BUILDING
DECEMBER 2ND, 1966, AND THAT PROVISIONS BE HADE AT THE TINE
OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE A LEDGE FOR EXTERIOR STONE OR BRICK
TREATMENT TO COINCIDE WITH TREATMENT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOP-
HENT TO THE NORTH. MR. GUHIENY SECONDED THE HOTION AND THE
NOTION CARRIED UNANIHOUSLY.
JITTLE MUSKEG0 LAKE COMMITTEE - MR. TED MIKULEC, REPRESENTATIVE
OF THE COHHITTEE, APPEARED AND PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING COHHUNI-
CATION DATED DECEHBER 2, 1966, DIRECTED TO THE PLAN CONHISSION,
SANE READ BY THE RECORDING SECRETARY:
I1 GENTLEHEN: THE LITTLE MUSKEGO LAKE COHMITTEE, FORHED BY MAYOR GOTTFRIED, SEPTEHBER, 1966, FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING THE
POSSIBILITIES OF IHPROVING THE PHYSICAL BEING OF LITTLE MUSKEGO LAKE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY AND PREPARING SUCH RECOHMENDA-
SANE, WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD WITH THE MUSKEGO PLAN COHNISSION TIONS AS THIS CITIZEN'S COHHITTEE MAY FEEL NECESJARY TO CONPLETE
WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL:
PAGE 7 - PLAN CONN.
DECENBER 6, 1966
WE RECOKKEND SERIOUS CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO THE INWEDIATE * KNOWN AS
PURCHASE OR ACQUIRING AN OPTION TO PURCHASE THE SCHWEFEL LAND
PT SW# SEC. 9, T5N R20E COK AT INTRSC OF E$ LINE &
ROAD 1721.4 FT N OF SE COR; TH S67O45'W 343.80 FT.
THE BGN; TH 1 25046 'W 142 FT; TH N 1 Sol 0 'v 277.70
204.51 FT; TH S66 33'W 155.02 FT; TH s 23'32 'E
228.70 FT; TH N54 0 E 125.05 FT TH S20°45'E 132
FT; TH N67O45 'E 157.75 ET TO BGN.
FT; TH N33O16'W 73.40 FT TO LAKE; TH S2o021 'w
Or
PRINARILY TC PROVIDE ACCESS LAND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
PROPOSED DAN AND SPILLWAY ON THE SOUTH SHORE OF' LITTLE- MUS-
KEGO LAKE FOR ADEQUATE CONTROL OF THE LAKE LEVEL. WE FEEL
IT IS OF VITAL INPORTANCE THAT THIS DAN AND SPILLWAY BE
CONSTRUCTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE FUTURE MEANS TO
INPROVE THE LAKE AND THE ACQUISITION OF THIS LAND IS NECES-
SARY TO COWPLETE THIS PROJECT. WE FURTHER SUGGEST THE PLAN COMKISSION RECONWEND TO THE CONNON COUNCIL THAT CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO SETTING ASIDE
APPROXINATELY 50' TO 100' WIDTH OF THIS LAND FRON HIWAY 24
TO THE LAKE IKNEDIATELY WEST OF THE SPILLWAY AS OPEN SPACE
AND APPLY FOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL AID AVAILABLE UNDER THE
11
11 OPEN SPACE ACT".
WE FURTHER SUGGEST THAT THE PLAN CONNISSION ADVISE THE CONNON COUNCIL THAT THIS LAND COULD TIE IN WITH THE CURRENT PRO-
POSAL FOR A CIVIC CENTER ON A SITE WEST OF THIS LAND AND INCLU-
DING THE WESTERN PART OF THE PARCEL OF LAND WE PROPOSE BE PUR-
CHASED FOR THE SITE OF THE DAN. WE FEEL THAT IF THE CONNON COUNCIL APPROVES THIS PROPOSED CIVIC CENTER SITE, THIS LAND WILL
CONPLIMENT THE CENTER WITH THE DAN AND SPILLWAY. HOWEVER, WE
INNEDIATELY AC WIRED REGARDLESS OF THE PLAN CONNISSION'S OR COKNON COUNCIL s DECISION TO APPROVE, REJECT, OR POSTPONE
PROVIDE PART OF THE LAND NECESSARY FOR THE CENTER AND WOULD
FEEL THE LAND FOR THE SITE OF THE DAK AND SPILLWAY STXLL BE
P
DECISION ON THE PROPOSED CIVIC CENTER SITE.
WE WELCONE THE OPPORTUNITY TO FURTHER DISCUSS THIS PROPOSAL
AND RECONNENDATION WITH THE PLAN CONNISSION AS THEY NAY DESIRE.
SINCERELY,
/s/ 0. VILLIAN GREINER
CHA IR NA N, LML c "
MR. MIKULEC INDICATED THE SCHWEFEL PROPERTY ON THE NAP
AND ADVISED THAT THE CONNITTEE WOULD LIKE TO BE INSTRUMENTAL
IN ESTABLISHING A PARK TO CONPLINENT THE HIWAY 24 RIGHT-OF-
WAY THROUGH MUSKEGO. HE STATED THAT MR. SCHWEFEL HAD INDI-
APPROXINATE SIZE OF PARCEL ESTINATED BY BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE AS 50' ALONG HIWAY 24, 250' LAKE FRONTAGE AND 3OO+' DEEP.
CATED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING TO GIVE AN OPTION ON THE LAND,
PACE 8 - PLAN COHN.
DECEMBER 6, 1966
3 BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE ALSO ADVISED THAT THERE WERE a FOUR EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY - 2 CONDENNED
COTTAGES, 1 GARAGE AND 1 OCCUPIED STRUCTURE.
MR. CHASE QUESTIONED IF IT WAS THE INTENT OF THE CONMITTEE
THAT THE CITY WOULD MAINTAIN TWO DAMS AND MAYOR GOTTFRIED
ANSWERED THAT THE EXISTING DAN ON THE SCHWEFEL PROPERTY WOULD
BE CLOSED. HE ALSO INDICATED THAT THEY HAVE THE DAN SPECIFI-
CATIONS AND THAT THE NONEY FOR THE DAN AND CHANNEL HAS BEEN
IN RESERVE FOR FOUR YEARS. BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE QUESTIONED IF FEDERAL AID WOULD
BE AVAILABLE FOR THE DAM~~AND DRAINAGE AND MAYOR GOTTFRIED
ANSWERED, POSSIBLY, YES . It
MR. CHASE QUESTIONED IF THE C~TY ACTUALLY OWNED THE
DAN AND MAYOR GOTTFRIED ANSWERED, IN TRUT?, NO, BUT THE CITY DOES MAINTAIN THE CONTROL OF THE DAN. THERE WAS SONE DISCUSSION AS TO THE PRICE OF THE PROPERTY,
BUT AN OFFER HAD NOT AS YET BEEN SUBNITTED BY MR. SCHWEFEL.
MR. RAIMANN QUESTIONED THE CONDITION OF THE DANS AND MAYOR GOTTFRIED ANSWERED THAT THE DANS WERE NOT IN GOOD
CONDITION. BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE REPORTED THAT THE DIKE WAS
NOT IN GOOD CONDITION. IT WAS NOTED BY THE COMKISSION THAT THIS AREA WAS SHOWN
MR. MIKULEC ADVISED THAT IT WAS THE FEELING OF THE CONMIT- ON THE CONPREHENSIVE PLAN AS A POTENTIAL CIVIC CENTER SITE.
I
I THE COHMISSION REVIEWED A TOPOGRAPHY MAP OF THE LAKE,
TEE THAT THE DAN SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED NEXT SUMMER. HE ALSO
ADVISED THAT BOAT LAUNCHING WAS NOT CONTEMPLATED FOR THE AREA.
AND ALSO DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE PURCHASE OF THE
LAND, THE BEAUTIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE DAM COULD
BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE CITY'S PAYMENT UNDER THE URBAN RENEWAL
PROGRAK. MR. CHASE NOVED THAT THE PLAN CONKISSION REQUEST THE PLANNER TO UNDERTAKE A PRELININARY STUDY OF THE CIVIC CENTER
LETTER FROM LITTLE MUSKEGO LAKE COMXITTEE DATED DECEMBER 2,
1966, SUN FOR STUDY NOT TO EXCEED $2000. MR. BUEHLER SECONDED
MR. BUEHLER MOVED THAT RECOMNENDATION BE NADE TO THE
SITE IN THIS AREA ENCOKPASSING THE PROPERTY DISCUSSED IN THE
THE MOTION AND THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COMNON COUNCIL TO YEGOTIATE WITH THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
IN QUESTION, MR. SCHWEFEL, TO ACQUIRE THIS DESCRIBED PARCEL. MR. LENTINI SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE NOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
PAGE 9 - PLAN COKM.
DECEKBER 6, 1966
'e, JAMES HERNKE - MR. & MRS. HERNKE APPEARED IN REGARD TO COHPLI-
ANCE WITHCONDITIONS AS SET FORTH ON THEIR CONDITIONAL USE
GRANT, JIM'S AUTO SERVICE, $73 W16680 JANESVILLE ROAD. THE COMMISSION EXPRESSED CONCERN AS TO THE NUKBER OF
JUNK CARS ON THE LOT AND MR. HERNKE ADVISED THAT HE USED SOME
OF THE TRUCK BODIES AND STATION WAGON BODIES FOR STORING OF
USEABLE PARTS, INDICATING THAT THEIR REQUEST FOR THE POLE
TYPE BUILDING TO STORE SPARE PARTS WOULD ALLEVIATE THE NECESSITY
TO KEEP THE JUNK CAR BODIES FOR SAME. MR. CHASE EXPRESSED THE OPINION THAT THIS TYPE BUILDING
MRS. HERNKE ADVISED THE COMKISSION THAT AT THE TIME THEY
WAS A FARK BUILDING PRIKARILY AND NOT SUITABLE FOR A CITY.
PURCHASED THE BUSINESS THEY WERE UNAWARE THAT THE AREA WAS
NOT ZONED FOR JUNK. IT WAS THE COKMISSION'S OPINION THAT THE USEABLE SPARE
PARTS WOULD NOT BE CLASSIFIED AS JUNK. MRS. HERNKE ALSO ADVISED
BLACKTOP THE DRIVE. HOWEVER, THE COKKISSION ADVISED THAT THEY
THAT THEY COULD NOT AFFORD TO BUILD A BRICK BUILDING NOR
WOULD BE RECEPTIVE TO A WORKABLE CLEAN-UP PLAN WHICH COULD BE
PROGRANMED OVER A PERIOD OF TIKE. THERE WAS A LENGTHY DISCUSSION OF HOW THE AREA COULD BE
IMPROVED AND IT WAS THE COMMISSION'S DECISION THAT MR. & MRS. HERNKE RETURN JANUARY 3, 1966, WITH A DEFINITE PROPOSAL AS TO
HOW THE AREA CAN BE CLEANED UP AND NADE PRESENTABLE. THERE WAS NO ACTION TAKEN ON THE HERNKE'S REQUEST FOR
EXPANSION OF CONDITIONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT A POLE TYPE SHED.
OTHER BUSINESS:
MUSKEGO NURSING HONK - As A RESULT OF THE PUBLIC HEARING
HELD JUST PRIOR TO THIS REGULAR MEETING FOR AN EXPANSION OF
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST TO BUILD AN ADDITION ON THE MUSKEGO NURSING HOKE, MR. LSNTINI KOVED TO GRANT THE EXPANSION OF
CONDITIONAL USE AS SUBHITTED. MR. GUMIENP SECONDED THE
MOTION. THERE WAS SONE DISCUSSION AND CONCERN THAT THE ADDITION
WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE SETBACK AREA, CLOSE TO HIWAY 24,
AND MR. CHASE WOVED TO AKEND THE KOTION TO INCLUDE THAT
BECAUSE OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE RE-LOCATION OF STH 24, THE
OWNER SHOULD AGREE TO RENOVE ANY, OR ALL, PORTION OF THIS ADDI-
TION NECESSARY TO CONPLY WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AT THE
TIHE THE HIGHWAY IS FINALLY WIDENED. THIS AKENDKENT WAS
DISCUSSED AND IT WAS THE FINAL OPINION OF THE COHMISSION THAT
THIS WOULD NOT BE FAIR TO THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND MR. CHASE
WITHDREW THE HOTION. a THE MOTION TO GRANT THE REQUEST CARRIED UNANIWOUSLY.
BIGHARD MAURICK - IN REGARD TO RICHARD MAURICE'S REQUEST
TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE AT LAKESIDE TOOL & MACHINE Go., W100
S7785RACINE AYE., REFERRED TO THE PLANNER AT THE PREVIOUS
PAGE 10 - PLAN CONN. DECENBER 6, 1966
NEETING, PLANNER KNETZGER REPORTED THAT THE PLANS SUBNITTED
8-3 DISTRICT, BUT THAT A SNALL VARIANCE WOULD HAVE TO BE
CONPLIED WITH THE NAXINUN PERNITTED FLOOR AREA RATIO OF THE
GRANTED FOR THE OPEN SPACE REQUIRENENT AS OPEN SPACE COULD
NOT INCLUDE THE PARKING AREAS ON THE PROPERTY.
MR. LENTINI MOVED TO APPROVE THE EXPANSION OF CONDITIONAL
USE WITH REQUIRED VARIANCE FOR OPEN SPdCE. MR. GUNIENY SECONDED
THE NOTION AND THE NOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY.
COMMUNICATIONS:
E. J. SALENTINE - THE FOLLOWING CONNUNICATION DATED
NOVENBER 25, 1966, DIRECTED TO THE PLAN CONNISSION, WAS READ
*,BY THE RECORDING SECRETARY:
I1 GENTLENEN: REGARDING THE LOT PURCHASED BY E. J. SALENTINE ON THE
CORNER OF TESS CORNERS DRIVE AND W. JANESVILLE ROAD; THE LAND
WILL BE USED AS A TENPORARY PARKING LOT UNTIL FINAL PLANS ARE
CONPLETED FOR SITE PREPARATION.
WHICH HAS, PROPERLY PREPARED, ROOM FOR 150 CARS. SET BACKS AND
AS A SALE LOTI BUT ONLY FOR TEKPORARY PARKING TO RELIEVE OUR
THERE WILL BE NO NORE THAN 50 CARS ON THIS LOT AT ONE TIKE
OFFSET WILL CONFORN TO REGULATIONS, THIS LOT WILL NOT BE USED
CRO~~ED CONDITIONS AND TO RELIEVE OUR STREET PARKING ON HIWAY 24.
/s/ E. J. SALENTINE
VERY TRULY YOURS,
MR. BUEHLER NOVED TO DIRECT THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO
ISSUE A TENP:ORARY USE PERMIT TO JUNE IST, 1967. MR. LENTINI
IT WAS THE CONNISSIO~S DECISION THAT THIS PERNIT WILL BE
SECONDED THE NOTION AND THE KOTION CARRIED.
ONLY FOR THE STORAGE OF NEW CARS AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED TO
INCLUDE ANY JUNK VEHICLES, MR. SALENTINE TO BE so ADVISED;
ALSO, THAT A CAR DEALERSHIP ON THIS PROPERTY KUST BE PROVIDED
BY A CONDITIONAL USE GRANT.
hAzyNsKI PLAT - A COPY OF A CONNUNICATION DIRECTED TO
MR. WALTER .LAZYNSKI# DATED NOVEKBER 30, 1966, FROK RUEKERT
.% MIELKE, REGARDING SANITARY SEWER EASENENT, WAS RECEIVED
AND PLACED ON FILE. IT WAS THE COHNISSION'S OPINION THAT MR. LAZYNSKI
SUBNIT A REVISED PLAT FOR SUBDIVIDING HIS PROPERTY BEFORE
THERE CAN BE ANY FURTHER PLANNING.
PAGE 11 - PLAN GOMN. DECEKBEB 6, 1966
U - PLANNER KNETZGER ADVISED THAT THE
INDUSTRIAL STUDY WAS NEARLY COMPLETED AND SUGGESTED THAT A
MEETING BE SCHEDULED FOR THE PRESENTATIONS FRON NELSON &
Assoc. AND RUEKERT de MIELKE. IT WAS THE CONNISSION'S DECISION
THAT THE NEXT PLAN CONKISSION MEETING BEGIN AT 7:OO P. M.
INSTEAD OF 0:OO P. M. FOR THIS PURPOSE.
MISCXLLANEOUS BUSINESS:
TECHNICOM RADIO TowEd - IT WAS BROUGHT TO THE CONMISSION'S
ATTENTION THAT ALTHO INDICATION OF APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL
USE WAS APPARENT FOR THIS RADIO TOWER, A FORMAL NOTION HAD NOT
BEEN MADE TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE. MR. CHASE KOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE GRANT
FOR TECHNICON RADIO TOWER WHICH HAD BEEN OVERLOOKED ON NOVEKBER 16, 1965. MR. BUEHLER SECONDED THE NOTION AND THE
NOTION CARRIED UNANIKOUSLY.
ADJOUBN~~ENT: MR. ~IKANN MOVED FOR ADJOURNNENT, MR. GUNIENY
SECONDED THE KOTION AND THF NESTING WAS ADJOURNED AT :20 P. N.
RESPECTFULLY SUBNITTED,
BARBARA J. SANDS
RECORDING SECRETARY
12-9-66
e