Loading...
PCM19660607CITY PLAN COMMISSION CITY OF MUSKEG0 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD JUNE 7, 1966 CITY HALL MAYOR GOTTFRIED CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 8:06 P. M. PRE?ENT: MAYOR JEROME GOTTFRIED, CHAIRMAN, WILLIAH CHASE, SEC Y, CHARLES BUEHLER, WILLARD BERTRAM, CLARENCE DAHLEN, S. ROBERT LENTINI AND ED RAIMANN. ALSO PRESENT WERE GERALD LEE, BUILDING INSPECTOR, AND RUSSELL KNETZGER, CONSULTANT. MINUTES: THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING, MAY 17, 1966, WERE APPROVED AS MAILED. HALES CORNERS SAND & GRAVEL - MR. BERNARD 1. FREUDENFELD, ATTORNEY, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF HALES CORNERS SAND & GRAVEL SAND AND GRAVEL PIT IN THE W1/2 OF THE sw1/4 OF SECTION 12 CONTAINING APPROXIHATELY 20 ACRES, PRESENTLY OWNED BY ERNEST BLUHM AND WHICH THE HALES CORNERS SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY IS DEFIROUS OF PURCHASING. MR. FREUDENFELD POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS A PARCEL BETWEEN HALES CORNERS SAND & GRAVEL PROPERTY AND THE BLUHM PROPERTY OWNED BY JOSE'PH MAGARICH. IT IS THE EXISTING PIT ON THE BLUHM PROERTY. MR. FREUDENFELD REQUESTED AND PRESENTED PETITION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN EXISTING IJTENTION OF THE GRAVEL COMPANY TO OPERATE AND RESTORE THE A JOINT HEARING FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE PERHIT FOR THE GRAVEL OPERATION AS WELL AS THE PETITION FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE BLUHM PROPERTY. MITTED AND PLANNER KNETZGER POINTED OUT THAT AN EXISTING PLAN WERE MISSING. THE COMMISSION NOTED THAT THE EXISTING PIT ON THE BLUHM PROPERTY WAS PRESENTLY 12' TO 15' DEEP. DATE FOR JULY 1 ~TH AT 7:OO P. M. FOR HALES CORNERS SAND & GRAVEL PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE BLUHM PROPERTY OPERATION PROVIDING MR. FREUDENFELD WOULD BE ABLE TO SUBMIT THE COMMISSION REVIEWED THE PETITION AND EXHIBITS SUE- TOPOGRAPHY MAP, STAGE RESTORATION PLAN, AND FINAL RESTORATION IT WAS THE COMMISSION'S DECISION TO SET THE PUBLIC. HEARING AND PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF THE PERMIT FOR THEIR EXISTING THE ABOVE MENTIONED NISSING EXHIBITS PRIOR TO THAT TIME. BERNARD C. LINDNEE - MR. LINDNER, W136 S6468 SHERWOOD CT., 5.97 ACRE PARCEL FROM 23.01 ACRES IN THE NV 1/4 OF SEC. 3, (IT HAD BEEN THE COMMISSION'S DECISION AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING THAT A 60' ROAD RESERVATION BE PROVIDED ON BOTH THE APPEARED AND PRESENTED CERTIFIED SURVEY FOR DIVISION OF SHOWING ROAD RESERVATION OF 60' ON THE WEST LOT LINE ONLY. EAST AND WEST LOT LINES.) MR. LINDNER POINTED OUT THAT A ROAD ON THE EAST WOULD NOT BE FEASIBLE BECAUSE OF THE TOPOGRAPHY. MAYOR GOTTFRIED AND BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE ADVISED THAT THEY HAD VIEWED THE LAND IN QUESTION AND THAT IT WAS THEIR OPINION THAT THERE WAS A NATURAL ROADWAY ON THE WEST, THE HILL ON THE EAST BEING TOO STEEP FOR ROAD PURPOSES. PLANNER KNETZGER POINTED OUT THAT HE WAS HOPING FOR TWO RESERVATIONS FOR MAXIMUM FLEXIBILITY IN THE EVENT OF ONE LARGE LAND DEVELOPMENT. MR. LENTINI HOVED TO APPROVE THE CERTIFIED SURVEY AS SUBMITTED BY HR. LINDNER. MR. BUEHLER SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION CARRIED. HEGERTY'S MQBdLE STATION - MR. ERIC LARSON, FIELD ENGINEER FOR HOBILE OIL Co., APPEARED SEEKING APPROVAL TO PORCELAINIZE THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF HEGERTY'S MOBILE STATION ON THE CORNER OF HY 24 AND LANNON DRIVE. MR. LARSON POINTED OUT THAT THIS WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR PAINTING, HE PRESENTED A PHOTO- BOTH REVIEWED BY THE COMMISSION. MR. LARSON ADVISED THAT GRAPH OF A PORCELAINIZED STATION AS WELL AS PLANS FOR SAME, THE MOBILE GO. WAS WILLING TO SPEND $3,000 TO KEEP THE STATIONS ATTRACTIVE AS WELL AS KEEP THIS SPECIFIC COLOR SCHEME FOR Ah' / I1 IHAGE" ACROSS THE COUNTRY. PLANNER KNETZGER ADVISED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WOULD BE NECESSARY FOR THIS REQUEST, HOWEVER IT WAS THE COMHISSION'S DECISION THAT A LETTER BE DIRECTED TO THE MOBILE OIL Go. REQUESTING OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS BRICK FOR THE EXTERIOR WALLS. CHARLES LA VERN - MR. GERALD SAEGER, 100 BLOOD ST., MUKWONAGO, OWNER OF THE BUILDING ON THE SE CORNER OF HYS. Y 24, APPEARED RELATIVE TO THE REQUEST OF CHARLES LAVERN TO OPEN A WHOLESALE ESTABLISHMENT IN THE FORMER DCA REAL ESTATE OFFICE. HE PRESENTED A PLOT PLAN FOR THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW. MR. SAEGER ADVISED THAT IT WAS MR. LAVERN'S INTENTION TO DEAL IN GENERAL BANKRUPT STOCK, SMALL ITEMS SUCH AS WATCHES, ETC. PLANNER KNETZGER ADVISED THAT ANY OFFICE FUNCTION OR RE- TAIL USE WOULD NOT REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE. IT WAS THE OPINION OF THE COMMISSION THAT THIS WOULD BE A COMBINATION SHOWROOM AND OFFICE. MR. CHASE HOPED TO DEFER ACTION, MR. RAIMANN SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION CARRIED. GERALD MATTKE - MR. GERALD MATTKE, S66 W12507 SO~ERSET DR., APPEARED RELATIVE TO A SWIMMING POOL WHICH HE DESIRES TO ERECT ABOVE GROUND IN THE REAR YARD OF HIS DWELLING. BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE READ SEC. 6.06 (7) D., PAGE 50, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO ABOVE GROUND SWIMMING a POOLS. MR. CHASE QUESTIONED IF MR. MATTXE WO~LD BE WILLING TO MATTKE ADVISED THAT HE WOULD PREFER NOT TO, THAT FOR SAFETY BUILD d FENCE AROUND THE POOL WITH GATE AND LOCK AND MR. PURPOSES THERE IS A VINYL, MESH COVER WHICH SNAPS ON THE POOL AND WILL STAND WEIGHT OF 150 TO 200 LBS. HE ALSO ADVISED THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING HEDGE ACROSS THE BACK OF THE LOT WHICH PROVIDES A NATURAL SCREENING THUS THE POOL WILL BE ONLY VISIBLE FROM THE ADJACENT SIDE LOTS. IT WAS THE DECISION OF THE CONMISSION THAT MR. MATTKE REFER TO HIS INSURdNCE COHPANY AS TO THEIR REQUIREMENTS AS TO FENCING, ETC., AND RETURN TO THE CONMISSION WITH THIS FURTHER INFORMATION. LESLIE GONSTANTINEAU - THE COMMISSION REVIEWED A PRELIPIINARY SHOWING LAND DIVISION OF SIX LOTS IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 24. R-3 ZONED DISTRICT, AVERAGE WIDTH REQUIREMENT Is 150', THIS TO BE NEASURED ACROSS THE NARROWEST POINT OF THE PARCEL. HE PLAT SUBNITTED BY MRS. CONSTdNTINEAU, s94 W12772 RYAN DR. PLANNER KNETZGER ADVISED THdT AS THESE LOTS ARE IN AN NOTED THAT THREE OF THE LOTS WOULD NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE. IT WAS THE OPINION OF THE COMMISSION THAT THE CONSTANTINEADS WERE ONLY INTERESTED IN A TWO OR THREE PARCEL DIVISION AND THAT THE PLAT SHOWING THE SIX PARCELS WdS FOR INFORMATIONAL PVRPOSES ONLY. IT WAS THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSION THdT A LETTER BE DIRECTED TO THE GONSTANTINEAUS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY ACTUALLY DESIRED THE SIX PARCEL DIVISION. , MR. DAHLEN MOVED TO DEFER ACTION PENDING MORE INFORMATION. MR. BUEHLER SECONDED THE NOTION AND THE WOTION CARRIED. - MR. DALE DAWSON, PRES. OF GRAVEL, INC., APPEARED RELATIVE TO HIS REQUEST FOR REDUCTION OF HIS RESTORATION BOND FROM $40,000 TO $30,000 AND PERMISSION TO EXCAVATE BELOW RESTORATION GRADE LEVEL. THE FOLLOWING LETTER DATED JUNE 2, 1966, FROM MR. DAWSON WAS READ BY THE RECORDING SECRETARY: GENTLEMEN: THE MATERIAL IN OUR Hwr. Y PIT IS OF EXCELLENT QUALITY THE PITS THAT ARE NOW IN OPERATION WILL ~VOT LAST LONG. TO THE DEPTH GREATER THAN WE WILL BE ABLE TO MINE. WE BELIEVE THAT NOT TOO MANY NEW PITS WILL BE OPENED IN THE CITY, THEREFORE IT IS ONLY GOOD THINKING TO CONSERVE THE NATURAL RESOURCES THAT ARE NOW AVAILABLE. WITH THIS IN NIND WE INTEND TO MINE OUR LAND TO A DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 50 TO 80 FT. BELOW THE RESTORED GRADE OF OUR PRESENT BESTORATION PLAN. HOWEVER, WHEN HWY. Y IS REROUTED THROUGH OUR PROPERTY THIS RESTORED DEPTH WILL BE TO APPROXIMATELY 20 TO FT. SINCE WE ARE PROGRESSIVELY FILLING THE DEPLETED AREA FROM THE EAST, THE DEPTH OF EXCAVATION IS NOT TOO IMPORTANT. TERY TRULY YOURS, /s/ DALE DAWSON THE COMMISSION EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THERE WOULD NOT DISCUSSION, MR. BUEHLER MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE COMMON COUNCIL THAT GRAVEL, INC. 's RESTORATION BOND BE FIXED AT $40,000 AND THAT EXCAVATION BE LIMITED TO THEIR PRESENT GRADE OF 40' BELOW PROPOSED RESTORATION GRADE. MR. DAHLEN SECONDED THE BE ENOUGH MATERIAL TO FILL A LARGER PIT AND AFTER CONSIDERABLE MOTION AND THE MOTION CARRIED. GRAVEL, INC., ALSO REQUESTED APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 32'x 40' GARAGE TO BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THEIR OFFICE NEAR TANS DRIVE. THE GARAGE WILL BE USED FOR TRUCK REPAIRING. PLANNER RNETZGER QUESTIONED IF THE FIRM WOULD BE WILLING TO TEAR DOWN THE GARAGE WHEN THE MINING OPERATION WAS FINISHED AND DALE DAWSON ANSWERED YES". 11 MR. CHASE MOVED TO APPROVE THE GARAGE AS AN ACCESSORY USE WITH THE CONDITION THAT THIS TEMPORARY BUILDING IS TO BE TORN DOWN WHEN THE OPERATION CEASES. MR. LENTINI SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION CARRIED. THE COMMISSION NOTED THAT THE ACCESSORY USE PERMIT FOR THE ASPHALT PLANT OPERATION WILL EXPIRE JUNE 19, 1966, AND A PETITION FOR RENEWAL MUST BE SUBMITTED. JOHN PETER2 - THE FOLLOWING LETTER DIRECTED TO MR. PETERS FROM BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE, DATED JUNE 2, 1966, WAS READ BY THE RECORDING SECRETARY: DEAR SIR: THIS LETTER IS IN REGARD TO YOUR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON THE PROPERTY THAT YOU OWN IN SECTION 25 IN THE CITY OF MUSKEGO. IN JANUARY, 1966, YOU PETITIONED THE CITY OF MUSKEGO FOR A CONDITIONAL USE STATUS AND WERE GRANTED SAME UNDER CBRTAIN CONDITIONS. AN INSPECTION OF YOUR PROPERTY ON MAY 31, 1966, FORTH BY THE PLAN COMMISSION. ACCORDING TO THE PLAN EXHIBIT E" YOU SHOW A 4' x 25' STORAGE SPACE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. ACCORDING TO THE PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 15, 1966, REVEALED THAT YOU HAVE FAILED TO LIVE UP TO THE CONDI!?',IONS SET MR. TESCH ADVISED THE COMMISSION THAT THERE WOULD BE AN AREA OF 25' X 4' USED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING FOR THE CURING OF TILE. THE INSPECTION OF MAY 31, 1966, SHOWS A LARGE STOCK PILE SOUTH OF THE BUILDING WHICH IS NOT PROVIDED FOR UNDER YOUR CONDITIONAL USE. FAILURE TO COMPLY TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH BY THE PLAN COMMISSION COULD RESULT IN REMOVAL OF YOUR CONDITIONAL USE STATUS. YOU SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONDITIONS SET BY THE PLAN 0 COMMISSION WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS UPON RECEIPT OF THIS LETTER SO THAT NO FVRTHER ACTION WILL BE NECESSARY. YOURS TRULY, /s/ GERALD P. LEE IT WAS THE COMMISSION'S DECISION THAT BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE DETERKINE IF CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND IF NOT ACTION WILL BE TdKEN BY THE PLAN COKMISSION. JOHN SCHAEFEB - THE FOLLOWING LETTER DIRECTED TO JOHN MORAVEC, PRESIDENT, OPERATION COKEBACK, FROK THE CONSERVATION DEPT., DATED MAY 23, 1966, WAS READ BY THE RECORDING SECRETARY: DEAR MR. MORAVEC: THIS OFFICE HAS NOT GRANTED DONALD AND JOHN SCHAEFER PERMISSION TO DIVERT WATER FROM THE BIG MUSKEGO LAKE, VAUKESHA COUNTY. IN FACT IN OUR LETTER DATED APRIL 26, 1966, TO THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO WE INDICATED WE DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION AT HAND TO EITHER AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE PUBLIC NEITHER SECTION 30.18 OR 30.19 OF THE WISCONSIN STATUTES SERVICE COMMISSION'S APRIL 26, 1966, LETTER INDICATING d PPL IED A REVIEW OF THE PROJECT BY OUR BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING SEC- TION INDICATES ON MAY 16, 1966, THE SCHAEFER DITCH AND LAGOON WAS CONNECTED WITH BIG MUSKECO LAKE. DIVERSION OF WATER FROM THE WORKS AS IT EXISTED ON MAY 16 WOULD BE CONSIDERED BY THIS OFFICE TO BE A VIOLATION OF SECTION 30.18, STATUTES AND WOULD RESULT IN ACTION BY OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION STAFF UNDER CHAPTER 200, LAWS OF 1965. INPERVIOUS BARRIER BETWEEN DURHAK DRIVE AND THE BASS BAY IT WAS FELT THAT IF THE SCHAEFERS BUILT AND MAINTAINED AN SPORTSMEN'S CLUB AT AN ELEVATION OF 11.9 FEET (0.3 FEET ABOVE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COKHISSION AUTHORIZED MAXIMUM FOR flUSKEG0 LAKE), THE WATER SYSTEM WOULD BE NO MORE HARMFUL TO THE LEVELS IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT TO THE SCHAEFERS THAT INASNUCH AS THE PIT AND DITCHES ARE CONNECTED TO MUSKEGO LAKE IT IS LIKELY ON MAY 16, THE SCHAEFERS AGREED TO PUMP OUT THEIR WATER SYSTEM AFTER INSTALLING A PROPER BARRIER RETURNING THE WATER TO LAKE MUSKEGO AND PERMITTING ANY STRANDED FISH TO BE RESCUED. THIS OF MUSKEGO LAKE THAN ANY HIGH CAPdCITY WELL WOULD BE. THAT FISH, PUBLIC PROPERTY, HAVE KOVED INTO THE WATER SYSTEM. SHOULD ALSO SATISFY ANY PROBLEM OF ENTRAPMENT OF SURFACE WATER IN THIS SYSTEM. WE AGREE WITH YOU THAT THE LAGOON IS LESS THAN 500 FEET FROM THE LAKE. ON MAY 16, IT WAS SOME 200 FEET FROM THE WATER'S EDGE (AT A TIME WHEN THE LAKE COULD HdVE BEEN AT 11.77 OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE AUTHORIZED MAXIMUN). YE MUST AGREE WITH THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THAT THE LAGOON AS A WATER SOURCE FOR AGRICULTURAL IS ONLY SO USED. IRRIGATION IS EXEMPT UNDER SECTION 30.19( 1 )(D) AS LONG AS IT e UNQUESTIONABLY, THE LAGOON WILL AT LEAST IN PART BE REPLEN- ISHED BY MUSKEGO LAKE WATERS PERCOLATING BACK INTO THE PIT. THIS OFFICE HAS LONG ASKED THAT IRRIGATION PITS BE REGULATED. G/E ARE STILL ASKING FOR SUCH A LAW. G/E DO NOT BELIEVE THE TAKING OF 600 G.P.M. OW WATER FROM SCHAEFER'S LAGOON FOR SOD IRRIGATION WILL BE MATERIALLY DAMAGING TO THE WATER LEVELS AND WILDLIFE HABITAT OF MUSKEGO LAKE UNDER THE CONDITIONS WE HAVE OUTLINED. /s/ L. P. VOIGT VERY TRULY YOURS, CONSERVATION DIRECTOR AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION, MR. CHASE MOVED TO DEFER ACTION AND BUILDING INSPECTOR LEE BE DIRECTED TO WITNESS MISSION. MR. BERTRAM SECONDED THE MOTION. UPON ROLL CALL, MESSRS. CHASE, BUEHLER, BERT RAM?^ DAHLEN, AND RAIMANN VOTED INCOMPETENT SURVEYORS - MAYOR GOTTFRIED ADVISED THAT HE HAD WRITTEN TO REUKERT & MIELKE REGARDING IMPROPER SUBMITTAL THE PUMPING OF THE POND AND REPORT THE RESULTS TO THE COM- 11 AYE" AND MR. LENTINI VOTED NO . II OF PERTINENT DATA FOR LAND DZVISIONS, THAT AFTER COMMUNICATING WITH OTHER COKMUNITIES IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THIS IS A COMMUNITY- * WIDE PROBLEM AND IT WAS DECIDED TO WRITE DIRECTLY TO THE STATE DEPT. AND ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH SURVEYORS MIGHT BELONG REQUESTING THAT THEY URGE THE SURVEYORS TO BE MORE ACCURATE IN THEIR WORK. RUEKERT & MIELKE REPLIED THAT A COPY OF MAYOR GOTTFRIED'S LETTER HAD BEEN FORWARDED TO A MEETING OF THE SOUTHEASTERN VIS. SURVEYORS SOCIETY TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6TH IN HOPES THAT THE LETTER WOULD BE READ AND ACTED UPON. PIGGLY-WIGGLX - THE FOLLOWING COMMUNICATION DIRECTED TO THE PLAN COMMISSION, DATED MAY 25, 1966, REGARDING THE NEW BERLIN PIGGLY-WIGGLY PROPOSED FOR THE CORNER OF HY 24 AND ESERSON DR., FROM KOERNER ASSOCIATES WAS READ BY THE &CORDING SECRETARY: DEAR SIR: LAST WINTER, WHEN PLANS FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT WERE APPROVED, THE APPROVAL WAS BASED UPON FACE BRICK FOR THE WEST, SOUTH AND EAST EXTERIOR WALLS, (NORTH WALL IS GLASS AND WOOD). SINCE THAT TIME BUILDING COSTS HAVE RISEN SO RAPIDLY THAT IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS PROJECT FEAS:lBLE WE ARE,flEQUESTING A CHANGE TO ANOTHER MATERIAL, NAMELY SPLIT-ROCK . r IN DISCUSSING THE USE OF THIS MATERIAL WITH YOUR PLANNING CONSULTANTS (NELSON & Assoc. 1, THE COLOR THAT WE ARRIVED AT WAS A BROWN VENEER WITH DARK MORTAR. THIS COMBINATION SHOULD THAT WE ORIGINALLY HAD IN MIND. BECAUSE NO CHANGES TAKE PLACE PRODUCE AN APPEARANCE VERY NEAR TO THAT OF THE BRICK AND MORTAR OTHER THAN A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS WE ARE NOT ENCLOSING ANY NEW PRINTS. AT THIS TIME WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO GET APPROVAL ON THE PLANTING SCREEN THAT YOUR PLANNING CONSULTANTS HAD RECOMMENDED. IN A PROPOSAL FROM MCKAY NURSERY COMPANY, IT WAS SUGGESTED TO us TO USE IVORWAY SPRUCE PLANTED 0 FEET ON CENTER AND STAGGERED IN THE PLANTING STRIP ALONG THE SOUTH AND EAST LOT LINES. FROM THE NURSERY'S DESCRIPTION, THESE ARE VERY DENSE TREES THAT CAN WITHSTAND OVERLAPPING BRANCHES AS THEY MATURE. THE MOST THEY ARE ABLE TO WITHSTAND WIND (THEY DON'T WINDBURN IN WINTER AS DO ARBOR VITEA AND JUNIPER), ARE FAIRLY MAINTANENCE FREE, AND PROVIDE A GOOD WIND BREAK. ONCE ESTABLISHED THE POSSIBILITY IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS, TREE IS THEIR HARDY NATURE. OF THESE TREES DYING IS SLIM, THUS, AVOIDING THE PROBLEM OF GETTING THE OWNERS TO REPLACE THEM. PLEASE CONSIDER THESE REQUESTS FOR APPROVAL AT YOUR NEXT PLAN COMMISSION MEETING. YOURS VERY TRULY, /s/ WILLIAM J. STENAVICH MR. BUEHLER ADPISED THAT NORWAY SPRUCE WAS SLOW GROWING AND NOT EXPECTED TO GROW WELL IN CLAY. IT MAS THE COMMISSION'S DECISION TO ADVISE KOERNER & Assoc. THAT SCOTCH PINE WOULD BE DESIRABLE AND THAT A FENCE WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED. SUBDIVISION CONTROL AMEWENT - THE FOLLOWING LETTER DIRECTED TO ATTORNEY HIPPENMEYER FROM MAYOR GOTTFRIER, DATED MAY 25, 1966, WAS REVIEWED BY THE COMMISSION: DEAR MR. HIPPENMEYER: IN REVIEWING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE DEDICATION OF LAND, OR IN LIEU OF THIS, PAYMENT TO THE CITY $200.00 PER LOT, AS I INTER- PRET IT, ALL LOTS WHICH WOULD BE DIVIDED IN THE FUTURE, WHETHER AS A RECORDED SUBDIVISION OR A SIMPLE DIVISION OF LAND, WOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AFENDMENT EXCEPT FOR THE EXE~~~TIONS PROVIDED FOR IN SEC. 2 (C) (3). SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE, THIS WAS NEVER FOLLOWED AND I FEEL THAT IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL AND THE PLAN COMMISSION ARE FULLY AWARE OF ALL THE RAMIFICATIONS AS YOU PROBABLY RECALL, PRIOR TO DELETING IT FROM THE OF THIS AMENDMENT. IF MY ASSUMPTIONS ARE CORRECT PLEASE VERIFY THEM. SINCERELY YOURS, /s/ JEROME J. GOTTFRIED 1' ATTORNEY HIPPENMEYER 's REPLY, DATED JUNE 2, 1966, WAS READ BY THE RECORDING SECRETARY: DEAR MAYOR GOTTFRIED: YOUR LETTER OF MAY 25, 1966, RAISES A VERY GOOD POINT, AND I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU THAT THE AMENDMENT AS PRESENTLY DRAWN MAY CREATE PROBLEMS. THEREFORE, PRIOR TO ITS ADOPTION, THE ORDINANCE COM- MITTEE SHOULD DECIDE WHETHER ALL DIVISIONS OF LAND ARE TO BE INCLUDED OR ONLY THOSE DEFINED AS SUBDIVISIONS BY SECTION 111 A. (1 ) AND (2). YbURS VERY TRULY, /s/ RICHARD S. HIPPENMEYER THERE WAS NO ACTION TAKEN ON THIS. STATE SAND & GRAVEL - MAYOR GOTTFRIED ANNOUNCED THAT A P. M. TO CONSIDER THE RENEWAL OF THE STATE SAND & GRAVEL OPERATION IN SECTION 18. FORREST PERKINS - PLAN COMMISSION MEMBERS WERE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD BEFORE THE COMMON COUNCIL JUST PRIOR TO THE PLAN COMMISSION MEETING THIS DATE FOR FORREST PERKINS' PUBLIC HEARING HAD BEEN SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 21ST AT 7:30 REQUEST TO REZONE TWO PARCELS IN SECTION 4: PARCEL A - FROM RS-2 TO B-1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONV. DISTRICT PARCEL B - FROM RS-2 TO RSM MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE MR. LENTINI MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE COMMON COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE REZONING REQUEST OF FORREST PERKINS. THE MOTION LOST FOR LACK OF A SECOND. PLANNER KNETZGER RECOMMENDED THAT THE B-1 ZONING BE GRANTED BUT THAT THE BOUNDARIES BE MOVED TO CREATE A LARGER cdv AREA SO THAT THERE WOULD BE SUFFICIENT AREA AVAILABLE TO . r-/ MR. CHASE HOVED TO DEFER ACTION UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING 1) J REDESIGN THE CORNER OF MAETIN DR. AND COLLEGE AYE.<-- $7- 5" /. L AND TO NOTIFY THE COMMON COUNCIL THAT THE COMMISSION REQUIRES ', I MORE TIME TO STUDY THE PROBLEM. MR. DAHLEN SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION CARRIED. URBAlv RENEWAJ, - ACTION WAS DEFERRED. LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION$ - PLANNER KNETZGER SUBMITTED A IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE COMMISSION MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE NEXT FINAL REPORT ON LAND DEVELOPKENT REGULATION AMENDMENTS WHICH MEETING. f.."' . 41 ? 'r -2. . r .- <I I ;' /--if a c I .A SEWRPC PLAN - PLANNER KNETZGER ADVISED THAT HE WOULD SUBMIT A REPORT ON THE SEWRPC PLAN AT A LATER XEETING. /-lc . . .'/ /" ' ,Are,.. .. 3. .I, 6 JJ,& -=rLL I. I 4 r~ .I - - f L~ 2 fl7, '2 pr 77 I .. c- -1 'U - tr A2 y "X i / - *' ; //. . t.1 L 9, ' " ~- I / ,>/. - c I, ADJOU- - MR. CHASE MOVED FOR ADJOURNNENT, MR. BUEHLER SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 12:30 A.M. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, BARBARA J. SANDS RECORDING SECRETARY DATED THIS 1 OTH DAY OF JUNE, 1966.