Zoning Board of Appeals 27-1997Amended Appeal #27-97
Frank Kozlik
S67 W21091 Tans Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
Tax Key No. 2184.995
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the
following two (2) variances:
1) Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) CA, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent
Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of
the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 504 square foot variance to construct
a 2,080 square foot accessory building. (zoning requirement is 1,696 s.f.)
2) Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 Height. No structure shall be erected or structurally
altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations of that district. Petitioner
seeks a 2 foot variance to construct an accessory building 17 feet in height. (zoning requirement is 15
feet)
Zoned: RCE, Country Estate
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Approve as submitted. Lack o4 hardship was discussed.
Denied
Chairman O'Neil�h�
G
Denied
Vice Chairman Brandt
Absent
Member Ross
Denied
Member Sehepp
Denied
Membe hnei er
Denied
Member Conley (l st Alt.
Absent
Member Herda (2nd Alt.)
CITY OF DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING
Matthew G. Sadowski, AICP
Director of Planning
IL
K- (414) 679-4136
0
October 31, 1997
Mr. Frank Kozlik
S67 W21091 Tans Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
RE: Appeal # 27-97
Dear Mr. Kozlik:
The Board of Appeals wishes to advise your appeals from Section
4.05 (2) C.4 Accessory Uses and 5.03 Height were denied due to lack
of hardship.
Should you have any questions, please contact Carlos Trejo at
679-5674.
Sincerel ,
Susan J. Schroeder
Recording Secretary
W182 S8200 Racine Avenue * Box 903 • Muskego, Wisconsin 53150-0903 • Fax (414) 679-5614
CITY OF MUSKEGO
BOARD OF APPEALS
MINUTES OF SEPTLMBER'"25, 1997
PRESENT: Chairman Terry O'Neil, Vice Chairman Mike Brandt,
Henry Schneiker, Dan Schepp, David Conley and Planning Assistant
Carlos Trejo.
ABSENT: James Ross and Ed Herda.
MINUTES: Mr. Brandt made a motion to approve the September
minutes as submitted, Mr. Schepp seconded. A voice vote was
called and the motion carried.
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE: Secretary reported notice was give
October 17, 1997, in accordance with Open Meeting Laws.
OLD BUSINESS:
Request to reconsider Appeal #26-97. Petitioner was not
present. Mr. Trejo stated the petitioner felt the Board was not
made aware that this structure was made legal nonconforming when
permits were issued for its original construction. This, they
felt, would more likely affect the Board's decision in terms of
their appeal. Chairman O'Neil stated since the petitioner was
not present, the Board would defer this issue until the end of
the meeting.
Signing of decision letters for September was deferred until the
December meeting.
NEW BUSINESS:
Amended Appeal #27-97
Frank Kozlik, S67 W21091 Tans Drive,Tax Key No. 2184.995. Under
the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, the
petitioner seeks the following two (2) variances: 1) Chapter
17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) C.4, Accessory Uses and
Structures, Permanent Structures, said regulation states no
detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60%
of the floor area of the principal building on the lot.
Petitioner seeks a 504 square foot variance to construct a 2,080
square foot accessory building. (zoning requirement is 1,696
s.f.)
2) Chapter 17-Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 Height. No
structure shall be erected or structurally altered to a height
in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations of
that district. Petitioner seeks a 2 foot variance to construct
an accessory building 17 feet in height. (zoning requirement is
15 feet). The property is zoned RCE, Country Estate
Mr. Brandt administered an oath to Mr. Frank Kozlik. This is an
amended request from the September meeting, due to the fact that
the posting did not include an existing 10 X 12 foot shed. Mr.
Kozlik proposed an additional outbuilding 2,080 square feet with
a 17 foot roof peak. The building will be used for storing a
yard tractor, bikes, snowmobiles, boat, canoe and various other
things. The roof has a 5/12 pitch so that a second level of
storage may be accommodated. The proposed canopy attached to
the outbuilding will be used as a planting area. The building
is compatible to others around the area.
Mr. Trejo stated this lot is legal nonconforming lot with only
2.3 acres; the RCE district requiring 2.75 acres and a 250
average minimum width. Mr. Trejo described the stated hardships
as a wish list, and these do not justify a reasoning for
granting a variance. The real problem here, specific to this
request, is the ordinance requirements. The Board is not here
to develop or compromise the ordinance, but to enforce the
requirements as they are, unless a reasonable hardship can be
justified. If the ordinance does not accommodate this specific
lot, the the appellant should be working to change the
ordinance, either with council or within the proper committees.
Claiming an ordinance is not allowing him the size of building
he is requesting is not a hardship.
Mr. Kozlik stated his hardship is the 60% ordinance, which only
takes into account the foot print of his home, not the rest of
the finished area of the residence. His residence can not be
increased in size. The building would be no different from
other outbuildings in the area and would not be contrary to the
spirit of the code or conflict with the public interest.
Appeal # 28-97
Mark Pizur, W147 S7272 Durham Drive, Tax Key No. 2201.989 Under
the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, petitioner
seeks the following one (1) variance: Chapter 17--Zoning
Ordinance: Section B.01 (7) B.2, Permitted Accessory Uses. Said
regulation states that the total floor area of all outbuildings
combined shall not exceed 1.0% of the lot area. Petitioner
seeks a 160 square foot variance to construct a 600 square foot
accessory building. (zoning requirement is 1,520 s.f.) The
property is zoned RS-2, Suburban Residence.
Mr. Brandt administered an oath to Mr. Pizur. Mr. Pizur stated
he purchased this property in 1988, with the intent to have
horses in the future. He currently has one outbuilding that
houses antique cars and is not set up to house horses. This lot
is 3.5 acres allowing for 3 horses. The size restriction would
not allow for the proper housing of the horses.
Mr. Trejo stated Plan Commission approved of an outbuilding up
to the permitted size; however, it deferred the additional size
up to 600 square feet if the petitioner could justify a hardship
to the Board. Mr. Trejo questioned why couldn't Mr. Pizur add
on to the existing outbuilding? Once again, the hardship here
is the ordinance, and the Board is here to enforce the ordinance
as it stands, unless an undo hardship can be provided. The
petitioner still has 440 square feet to utilize for additional
contractor. This estimate exceeded the 50% rule in terms of the
structural work performed.
Mr. O'Neil spoke on behalf of the residents in the area. He
stated this structure has not been inhabited for many years. He
has boarded up windows and painted over graffiti for many
years. In his opinion, hardship for this property is the
location of the preexisting structure, the lot being bordered by
two streets and the fact a permit had been previously issued by
the Building Department.
Mr. Gatzke stressed that it was not the intent of Mr. Lubecke to
violate the 50% rule. He stated that the rule, as it reads, is
confusing. He understands that it is common and that
contractors and builders probably have some sort of
understanding of its concept, but to a common resident, it makes
little sense.
DELIBERATIONS - Since there was nobody in the audience
awaiting deliberation on their appeal, Attorney Gatzke requested
if the Board would deliberate Appeal #29-97, first.
Appeal #29-97
Mr. Schepp made a motion to approve the appeal as submitted, Mr.
Schneiker seconded. Discussion ensued over the following
hardships: 1) miscommunication with previous building permit
issued, 2) loss of use of home and 3) location of lot on two
roads and shape of lot. Mr. Schepp amended is motion to
included that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
appellant will have to remove the existing garage located near
the intersection, and remove the existing brush and berm located
along Jewel Crest Drive, Mr. Schneiker seconded. Furthermore,
the house is to be reconfigured as submitted in the alternate
plan that removes a portion of the nonconforming second level.
Upon roll call vote, the motion carried. (4-0)
Mr. O'Neil resumed chairmanship.
APPEAL #27-97 Mr. Brandt made a motion to approve the appeal as
submitted, Mr. Conley seconded. Discussion ensued over the
hardships stated by the appellant and the limitations set by the
ordinance. Upon a roll call vote, the motion was denied. (5-0)
APPEAL #28-97 Mr. Brandt made a motion to approve appeal as
submitted, Mr. Schneiker seconded. Discussion ensued over the
hardships stated by the appellant and the limitations set by the
ordinance. Upon a roll call vote, the motion was denied. (5-0)
Miscellaneous Business:
Appeal #26-97, The Board agreed to rehear the appellant's
request in the next meeting. Items in regards to rules and
procedures were deferred until the next meeting.
Mr. Trejo informed the Board in regards to a recent court case
limiting city officials access onto private property. The
current Board forms will be revised to contain a statement
AGENDA
CITY OF MUSKEGO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Wisconsin State Statute 62.23 (7) (e) 6, that a Public Hearing
will be held in the Muskego Room at the Muskego City Hall, W 182 S8200 Racine Avenue, at 7:00 P.M.,
Thursday, October 30. 1997. to consider the following petitions for appeals to the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Muskego:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 25, 1997, MEETING
5. OLD BUSINESS
• Request to reconsider Appeal 426-97
• Signing of decision letters for August.
6. NEW BUSINESS
Amended Appeal #27-97
Frank Kozlik
S67 W21091 Tans Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
Tax Key No. 2184.995
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the
following two (2) variances:
1) Chapter 17--ZoningOrdinance: Section 4.05 (2) CA, Accessory Uses and Structures,
Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area
greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 504
square foot variance to construct a 2,080 square foot accessory building. (zoning requirement is
1,696 s.f.)
2) Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 Height. No structure shall be erected or
structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations of that
district. Petitioner seeks a 2 foot variance to construct an accessory building 17 feet in height.
(zoning requirement is 15 feet)
Zoned: RCE, Country Estate
Appeal # 28-97
Mark Pizur
W 147 S7272 Durham Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
Tax Key No. 2201.989
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the
following one (1) variance:
BOA 10/23197
Page 2
I) Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 8,01 (7) B.2, Permitted Accessory Uses. Said
regulation states that the total floor area of all outbuildings combined shall not exceed 1.0% of
the lot area. Petitioner seeks a 160 square foot variance to construct a 600 square foot
accessory building. (zoning requirement is 1,520 s.f.)
Zoned: RS-2, Suburban Residence
Appeal #29-97
Dean A. Lubecke
W 183 S6526 Jewel Crest Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks one (1) variance:
1. Chapter 17--ZoningOrdinance: Section 4.06 (2) A. Legal Nonconformity: Classification and Regulation
- Nonconforming Structure. Said regulation restricts expansion or enlargement of a nonconforming
structure except within conformity of the zoning district. Petitioner seeks to repair, alter, and expand said
structure over 50% of its current fair market value.
Zoned.: RS-3/OLS, Suburban Residence District with a Lake Shore Overlay
7. Miscellaneous Business.
• Review information for revised rules and procedures, application form and handouts
NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Appeals of the City of Muskego may convene, upon passage
of the proper motion. into closed session pursuant to Section 19.85 (1) (a) of the State Statutes for the
purpose of deliberating concerning cases which were the subject of a quasi-judicial hearing; said cases
being the above listed appeals.
The Board of Appeals will then reconvene into open session. Detailed descriptions are available for
public inspection at the Clerk's office. All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard.
Board of Appeals
City of Muskego
Terry O'Neil, Chairman
Dated this 17th day of October, 1997
w
PLEASE NOTE: It is possible that members of and possibly a quorum of members of other
governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above -stated meeting other than the
governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice.
Also, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals
through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Jean
K. Marenda, City Clerk. at Muskego City Hail, 679-5625.
Also, Board of Appeals members may conduct site visits for informational purposes
BOA 09/25/97
Page 3
building has been built according to the zoning or
subdivision regulations, sets a bad precedence.
Mr. Prindiville stated that the intent is to enclose an
already existing, covered stoop area. That no further
infringement within the the setback area will happen.
Appeal #27-97 Frank Kozlik, S67 W21091 Tans Drive, Tax Key
No. 2184.995. Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1)
Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following two (2)
variances: 1) Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05
(2) C.4, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent
Structures. Said regulation states no detached private
garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of the
floor area of the principal building on the lot.
Petitioner seeks a 364 square foot variance to construct a
2,080 square foot accessory building. (zoning requirement
is 1,696 s.f) and 2) Chapter 17-Zoningrdinance:
Section 5.03 Height. No structure shall be erected or
structurally altered to a height in excess of that
hereinafter specified by the regulations of that
district. Petitioner seeks a 2 foot variance to construct
an accessory building 17 feet in height. (zoning
requirement is 15 feet) The property is zoned RCE,
Country Estate
Vice Chairman Brandt administered an oath to Mr. Kozlik.
Mr. Kozlik explained Plan Commission approved the building
without the canopy. The canopy is needed for shelter when
working on fruit and vegetable plants. The height is
needed to allow to hang-up bicycles without walking into
them. This structure would be screened from the neighbors
by trees. Currently there is a 2 car attached garage and
a 10' x 12' shed; the shed is used for tools and will not
be removed.
Mr. Trejo stated this is a legal nonconforming property.
He also stated there is an attached garage, which received
a variance in 1990, and a full basement on the property.
Mr. Trejo question where the hardship is in this request.
Point of order was called. The variance request did not
include the 10' x 12' shed. The appeal needs to be
recalculated, re -noticed and placed on the next agendas
Mr. Schneiker made a motion to defer Appeal 27-97 to the
October meeting. Mr. Ross seconded. Upon voice vote,
motion was approved.
DELIBERATION:
Appeal #23-97 Mr. Schepp made a motion to approve as
submitted. Mr. Herda seconded. After discussion it was
determined there was a lack of an appropriate hardship to
AGENDA
CITY OF MUSKEGO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Wisconsin State Statute 62.23 (7) (e) 6, that a Public Dearing
will be held in the Muskego Room at the Muskego City Hall, W 182 S8200 Racine Avenue, at 7:00 P.M.,
Thursday, September 25, 1997, to consider the following petitions for appeals to the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Muskego:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
4, APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 28, 1997, MEETING
5. OLD BUSINESS
• Signing of decision letters for August.
• Appeal 23-97 (deferred from August meeting)
6. NEW BUSINESS
Appeal # 25-97
Kenneth J. Liebe[
W 179 S6948 EIm Drive
Muskego. WI 53150
Tax Key No. 2176.022
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks one (1)
variance: Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 (3) A.I Building Location, Offsets. No
structure shall be erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except within conformity with the
district it is located. Petitioner seeks a 5.5 foot variance to place a detached accessory building 3.5
feet from the southeast lot line. (zoning requirement is 9 feet)
Zoned: RS-3/OED, Suburban Residence District with an Existing Development Overlay
Corrected
Appeal # 26-97
Joseph and Mary Jo Garinger
S75 W l 2494 Coventry Lane
Muskego. Wl 53150
Tax Kev No. 2208.014
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks one (1)
variance: Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 (2) B. Building Location, Setbacks. No
structure shall be erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except within conformity with the
district it is located. Petitioner seeks a 2 foot variance to place an addition to existing residence 33
feet from Coventry Lane road right-of-way. (zoning requirement is 35 feet)
Zoned: RS-2/OPD, Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
BOA 09/25/97
Page 2
Appeal #27-97
Frank Koalik
S67 W21091 Tans Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
Tax Key No. 2184.995
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the
following two (2) variances:
1) Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) CA, Accessory Uses and Structures,
Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area
greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 384
square foot variance to construct a 2,080 square foot accessory building. (zoning requirement is
1,696 s.f.)
2) Chapter 17—Zonins Ordinance: Section 5.03 Height. No structure shall be erected or
structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations of that
district. Petitioner seeks a 2 foot variance to construct an accessory building 17 feet in height.
(zoning requirement is 15 feet)
Zoned: RCE, Country Estate
7. Miscellaneous Business.
• Establishing meeting date for November/December meeting
• Review information for revised rules and procedures, application form and handouts
NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Appeals of the City of Muskego may convene, upon passage
of the proper motion, into closed session pursuant to Section 19.85 (1) (a) of the State Statutes for the
purpose of deliberating concerning cases which were the subject of a quasi-judicial hearing, said cases
being the above listed appeals.
The Board of Appeals will then reconvene into open session. Detailed descriptions are available for
public inspection at the Clerk's office. All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard.
Board of Appeals
City of Muskego
Terry O'Neil, Chairman
Dated this 12th day of September, 1997
PLEASE NOTE: It is possible that members of and possibly a quorum of members of other
governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above -stated meeting other than the
governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice.
Also, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals
through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Jean
K. Marenda. City Clerk, at Muskego City Hall, 679-5625.
Also, Board of Appeals members may conduct site visits for informational purposes.
CITY OF MUSKEGO
BOARD OF APPEALS
Application for Variance
Applicants Name
i
Subject Property Address: J C- ��/ 0 y/ ze4 -4
Telephone e�p,�V_ /YYZ-
Property ZoninKey #
Petitioner's relationship to property (circle applicable):
owner lessee other
Fees: $195.00
Date inspector denied permit:
Requesting variance to Section 05 Z,�.
To allow:
�,u-cox.✓ ,�d' ��uu�c.c ✓�� � es�u-y-
7,/_vim .r
> L i .r7.�._'o � . � �-J ,T �.,._. / 4.7 _,; 7
A literal enforcement of the terms of the above -referenced section
would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship
because:
r
,�.[ c �cr
The variance, /f granted, will n�tb contrary to the public
interest and will be in accord with the spirit of the code because:
�1JWl ✓!i`l7�lr'� /1�[A A9`lf� AU/t /✓/.l'Ui�/ A� t � � /
The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect public safety
or jeopardize public welfare because:
FINS 1401piM01
CORRECTED
RESOLUTION #P.C. 157-97
APPROVAL OF A 2,080 SQUARE FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
FOR FRANK KOZLIK AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
S67 W21091 TANS DRIVE
WHEREAS, A site plan and construction information was submitted on August 7, 1997,
by prank Kozlik to construct a 2,080 accessory structure at the residence located at S67 W21091
Tans Drive,
WHEREAS, The property is zoned RCE, Country Estate, and requires Plan Commission
approval for all secondary accessory structures, and
WHEREAS, The total square footage for accessory structures is limited to 60% of the
total first floor primary space and the home contains 2,357 square feet which would allow 1,414
square feet of accessory building square footage, and
WHEREAS, The proposed accessory structure totals 1,696 square feet of enclosed
storage space and 384 square feet of open cover space, totaling 2,080 square feet, or 666 square
feet over the permitted square footage, and
WHEREAS, The location of the structure maintains all necessary offsets and setbacks,
and the ultimate height is limited to 15 feet, the architectural appearance would be compatible
with the applicant's surrounding area, and the materials submitted do not propose the use of this
nor any other structure on the property for business related activities.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of a compatible
size structure not exceeding 1,414 square feet for Frank Kozlik in accordance to Section 4.05 (1)
B and 6.11 (2) and that subject accessory structure not be used for the operation of a business nor
the storage of business related material or equipment. Plan Commission allows the additional
square footage for an accessory structutre up to 1696 square feet. However, no building permits
will be issued for subject accessory structure until the addition of the home has been completed.
Petitioner may apply to Board of Appeals for additional 384 square feet as subject design appears
to be appropriate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the terms of this resolution
and the approved site plans shall result in the issuance of fines of $100 per day per violation, the
initiation of legal action, or both.
Plan Commission
City of Muskego
Approved 09-02-97
�IsS i p
l�G.a' CAL x '{ zGY 1L2
I
ftt;x 15.6' 40%
4: iZ1VLE II, o'A.44
N I'
L I
ub
LY
H
ZQ,si
Cumo s- �[.vo k-- Pars �s
w
CL
m
m
4
h
w
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATILw.ON
SOUTH ELEVATION
.�.�.a bw .
WEST ELEVATION
0=i�;�_�� .mot -•:ice• -;.�r.�-'. _^:;,�.i�" .T
�k ..
C46
C-r C. t
G S
L
r r o 0 Viz 0' 0 rr�'
CO2 CO
to :. ,CD Q O z R p er„o
CD
CD
s� . i • - .r�J.. - .��. Y. s. _ r'-' ' V . (,.y CD¢: fl to rr
CD
to
C3 to
'' O r •• - mti ►- W �i
-