Loading...
Zoning Board of Appeals 21-19979 CITY OF hfUSKEG September 3, 1997 Mr. and Mrs. Edward Kogutkiewicz 5103 W19439 Kelsey Drive Muskego, WI 53150 RE: Appeal #21-97 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kogutkiewicz: DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING Matthew G. Sadowski, AICP Director of Planning (414) 679-4136 The Board of Appeals wishes to advise you that your appeal from Section 4.05 (2) c.4., Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent Structures to allow an accessory building 1,440 square feet was denied due to lack of hardship. Should you have any further questions, please contact Carlos Trejo at 679-5674. Sincerely, Susan J. Schroeder Recording Secretary W182 S8200 Racine Avenue 9 Box 903 • Muskego, Wisconsin 53150-0903 + Fax (414) 679-5614 Appeal #21-97 Edward and Sandra Kogutkiewicz S103 W19439 Kelsey Drive Tax Key No. 2285.997.001 Muskego, W1 53150 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks one (1) variance: 1. Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) CA, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 128 square foot variance to total 1,440 square feet. (only 1,312 s.f. permitted) DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Approve as submitted. No hardship stated. Chairman O'Neil Vice Denied Abstained Absent Approved Denied Me=Scer L1,11 A�& Denied Ross (l st Alt.) CORRECTED CITY OF MUSKEGO BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF AUGUST 28, 1997 PRESENT: Chairman Terry O'Neil, Vice Chairman Mike Brandt, Henry Schneiker, Dan Schepp and James Ross. ABSENT: Ed Herda MINUTES: Dan Schepp made a motion to approve the July minutes as submitted. Henry Schneiker seconded. A voice vote was called and the motion was carried. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE: Secretary reported notice was given August 15, 1997, in accordance with Open Meeting Laws. OLD BUSINESS: Request to reconsider Appeal #20-97. Chairman O'Neil requested to table discussion until end of meeting as no one was present to discuss this appeal. Signing of decision letters for June and July meetings. Chairman O'Neil requested this to be done at the end of the meeting. NEW BUSINESS: Appeal # 21-97, Edward and Sandra Kogutkiewicz, S103 W19439 Kelsey Drive, Tax Key No. 2285.997.001. Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, the petitioner seeks one (1) variance, Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) C.4, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 128 square foot variance to total 1,440 square feet. (only 1,312 s.f. permitted) Member Mike Brandt stepped down on this appeal as he is an acquaintances of the appellant. Chairman O'Neil administered an oath to Edward and Sandra Kogutkiewicz. The Kogutkiewicz purchased parcels one and two a year ago, and thought it was an exclusive agricultural property totalling 2.3 acres. Existing on the property was a 24' x 38' barn which they intend to paint and use as a tool shed. The barn is not conducive to being used as a garage because it has cross member support beams within the interior area, reducing the usability of the open space. Mr. Kogutiewicz has old cars he works on as a hobby and requires a 22' x 24' garage in order for storage and to work on them. Mrs. Kogutkiewicz stated the hardship is the existing garage does not allow for the storage of the vehicle because of the cross beams, remodeling the barn to increase the open space would be to great, and Mr. Kogutiewicz has physical mobility problems to work on the vehicles if they were stored in a tight area. Mr. Trejo stated the property is actually 2.1 acres and is zone R-1 Country Home. Because it is under 2.75 acres it falls under the 60% rule for outbuildings. A 20' x 20' garage (499 s.f.) is the maximum allowable. The Kogutiewicz have not exhausted all their options for creating a larger open space to satisfy their needs. They can still convert and remodel the existing barn, they can expand the existing attached garage, or they can raze the old barn and build a new one. It is Staff's opinion that a hardship has not be shown. Mike Brandt returned to the Board. Appeal #22-97, David Conley, S70 W18899 Gold Drive, Tax Key No. 2180.943. Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, the petitioner seeks one (1) variance, Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) C.4, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 80 square foot variance to total 560 square feet. (only 480 s.f. permitted) Chairman O'Neil administered an oath to David Conely. Mr. Conely stated he currently has a 17' x 25' deep block garage with a 7 foot overhead door. His vehicles do not fit side by side inside because of the width. He owns three vehicles and a boat. He is requesting a 20' wide x 28' deep new garage with in the conformance area. The garage would be deep in space for length wise due to the offset requirements and the additional space would give him needed storage area. His home has no basement or attic storage area. Mr. Trejo stated under the 60% rule, a 480 sq. ft. garage would be allowable, he is 80 feet short for his request. The proposed garage would fit within the offset and setback. The existing garage was built prior to the 1963 Ordinance and is to close to the lot line. An alternative to the variance would be to attach the garage to the home. Mr. Conley stated his hardship is a lack of storage, his house was originally a cottage, and the narrowness of the parcel leaves him with no other alternative. He is willing to remove the existing garage to allow for the larger one which would enable him to park more than one vehicle inside. Appeal #23-97, Gary and Joanne Webb, S70 W17575 Muskego Drive, Tax Key No. 2176.169. Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, the petitioner seeks (2) variances: 1. Chapter 17-zoning Ordinance: Section 4.06 (2) A.1 Legal Nonconformity: Classification and Regulation. No such Mr. Schneider stated he would be removing an old structure and replacing it with a new one, increasing the value of the surrounding properties and making the area more attractive. DELIBERATIONS: Appeal # 21-97 Mr. Brandt stepped down during the deliberations. Mr. Schepp made a motion to approve the appeal as submitted. Mr. Ross seconded. It was determined that no hardship existed, the appellant still had the options of removing the existing barn, modify it, expanding it, or expanding the existing attached garage. Upon roll call vote, motion failed. 3-1 (Mr. Schepp voting yes). Mr. Brandt returned to his chair. Appeal #22-97 Mr. Schepp made a motion to approve the appeal as submitted. Mr. Brandt seconded. It was discussed that the lot is uniquely shaped and the dwelling unit small in comparison to the required zoning minimum square footage. The petitioner can not attach the garage, since the home is nonconforming. And the lack of a basement makes a good argument for the need for increased storage. Mr. Schepp made a motion to amend the approval to include that the existing garage and slab must come down within 30 days after final inspection. Mr. Brandt seconded. The dead end street was also taken into consideration for allowing the appeal. Upon roll call vote, the motion carried 4-1 (Mr. Schneiker voted no). Appeal #23-97 Mr. Brandt made a motion to approve the appeal as submitted. Mr. Ross seconded. It was determined there is a hardship for the dormers (lack of storage because of a partial basement). The members discussed reorientation of the garage to be within the setback and offset. It was agreed upon to defer the garage and driveway request for 60 days and for a new drawing be submitted. Mr. Brandt made a motion to amend the variance request and approve only the addition of the dormers and defer the remaining appeal until revised drawings are submitted within a 60 day period, Mr. Ross seconded. Upon roll call vote, the amended appeal was approved unanimously. APPEAL #24-97 Mr. Brandt made a motion to approve appeal as submitted. Mr. Ross seconded. Discussion ensued regarding the existing garage and the lack of a hardship for this request. Upon roll call vote, the appeal was denied. (5-0). OLD BUSINESS: APPEAL #20-97 Mr. Schepp made a motion to approve a request to reconsider Appeal #20-97. Mr. Schneiker seconded. The Board agreed that no new evidence has been submitted to justify a rehearing and that not being in attendance at the scheduled meeting justified a need for rehearing. Upon a roll call vote, the motion to approve the reconsideration was denied, 4-0. (Mike AGENDA CITY OF MUSKEGO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Wisconsin State Statute 62.23 (7) (e) 6, that a Public Hearing will be held in the Muskego Room at the Muskego City Hall, W 182 S8200 Racine Avenue, at 7:00 P.M., Thursday, August 28, 1997, to consider the following petitions for appeals to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Muskego: 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE JULY 24, 1997, MEETING 5. OLD BUSINESS Request to reconsider Appeal # 20-97. Signing of decision letters for June and July meetings. 6. NEW BUSINESS Appeal # 21-97 Edward and Sandra Kogutkiewicz S 103 W 19439 Kelsey Drive Tax Key No. 2285.997.001 Muskego, WI 53150 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks one (1) variance: 1. Chapter 17--ZoningOrdinance: Section 4.05 (2) CA, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 128 square foot variance to total 1,440 square feet. (only 1.312 s.f. permitted) Appeal 922-97 David Conley S70 W 18899 Gold Drive Tax Key No. 2180.943 Muskego, WI 53150 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks one (1) variance: I. Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 (2) CA, Accessory Uses and Structures, Permanent Structures. Said regulation states no detached private garage shall have a floor area greater than 60% of the floor area of the principal building on the lot. Petitioner seeks a 80 square foot variance to total 560 square feet. (only 480 s.f, permitted) CITY OF MUSKEGO BOARD OF APPEALS 41 t ", -- a,-J ,,, 8--dime A ,;� -254 , dcdi Clre o -� G 7f-4L 79 i Applicants Name Subject Property Application for Variance Address: W i Telephone Property Zoning ;,,+ �tr,y� Key # 2_*7 Petitioner's relationship owner lessee Fees: $195.00 to property (circle applicable): other j4Date inspector denied permit: ,AA *Requesting variance to Section To allow: A literal enfo`f:ce#ient ofAthe teims off' the abov-'--referenced sec,�ionl would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardships' because: J4 c, t[iycd(GU oL l Opt- P&04 d wll&,fin& - 4%W JA" Aq The variance, if gr� interest and will be ted, will not be contrary to the public in accord with the spirit of the code because: The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect public safety or jeopardize public welfare because: �• trc4 itKI .:F aAlf - CA4A &ta, A7cr ` y Ti t u�ll .ae • 6l1m 6¢i,,c.,P����,� 1983. A%7.9c 11/1' Rv4r- 1 � ` %* etc m ? �\11111111�1tE1111u1!!h NIN 4�wC��1 Lb era0 co Go GCV O C C =C �C Q= Q'� 0 4 ga Z3 m =c. w G in `'ii': r 00. OO 4 0*< a� p !/!!ll:JJiilJllll1414411111 � \ ; i � m C ID ~ `1 n a a r M. ro o f 7n'o m O � " �o, _, e J Q N PE M m x Z It (A dVrpp x s Q s N tp t N J" tr a, c m +Z 4 P C I C 0 fat • �► cl ft M. ON« w O O Cf n --3 O rD --, a cn D7 x C r O E • co Jn X\:3 fD tD A Q. `< � CU O O N x7 C O +-+ O a C4 cn • h O. t7 a fD c n n m z ONE& m o a w rn N t*3 O O C a to c* O C •< � ay C [i1 ct Ln f} O O V• - O O .- lU W H Cr7 R7 Di of � n c* c* 0 �• M a C+ :X rD Ply, i YWO-Car Gara-ge'. S So_gr Llifferent Sizes: "J"'uF1ai reamres •22' x 22' • 2O, x 22, •20' 22 x 24 x 24' •20' x 28' •22' • Gable Entry 1ft ; Double Garage x 28' Door • Available Options: • 8/12 or 4/12 Pitch Gable Roof • Slab or Stem Wall Foundation • Side Window • Side Personnel Door • Many Popular Sidings 9 • Affordable Construction • Materials Lists Included t 3 Bu ICR-YOUMIf p ROJECT PLAN June 26, 1997 Plan Commission, City of Muskego Re; New two car garage To all this may concern; The garage we would like to be able to build would be a 22wide by 24 deep,two car garage. We would prefer an 8' x 16' raised panel steel overhead door. Also a service door on the south side of the garage, steel. A window on the eastern end is also planned. As well a 6/12 pitch roof is preferred, but no less than a 4/12. it would be sided in a `Khaki' color. Either vinyl or aluminum, with matching soffitts and fascia. That is $ color very close to the color of our home. Barley'. The roof would be a 20/25 year shingle to match the house. We are looking for quality with very low maintenance. The garage would open to the driveway we have, on the northeast edge of the existing 2402 stable. (please see enclosed plat/drawings). Odr purpose for this garage is to store collector/hobby cars. Our home, without the porches,garage,etc. is, according to our building contract a minimum of 2250 sq.' on the main floor. Thank you for your kind attention and consideration. It is very much appreciated. Respectfully, Ed and Sandi Kogutkiewicz, S 103 W 19439 Kelsey Dr., Muskego. 414-679-4667 encl. picture, survey/plat, building materials, CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION SHEET Address of Property it The zoning district The setback requirement Type of Structure Offset Requirement Storage Shed Garage Barn Pole Barn Size of Structure�"2-Size of Lotdd0 1(3 Oe5 Proposed Use of Structure Parking Cold Storage Flammable Storage Housing of Livestock Will Building Require: • Electrical. Service/.V+ Fing Plumbing List A1.1; e� ,t " :,- �ered within prcrc z.' structure *., . {equipment, mater.Ils, supplies, vehicles, etc.j Signature of P ifttio�ner Address Planning & -Development Phone Date Dated I ; .-uo.-.- — - , —