Loading...
ZBA-Minutes 16-1990CITY OF MUSKEGO BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD ON JULY 26, 1990. Vice Chairman Terry O'Neil called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. PRESENT: - Vice Chairman Terry O'Neil, Lloyd Erno, Bonnie Posbrig ana—D-fr--ector Gerald Lee. ABSENT: - Chairman Gerald Fohr, Thomas Berken, Daryl Rowinski and Donafd Pionek (but he was able to participate in voting). MINUTES: - Mrs. Posbrig made a motion to adopt the Minutes of the une , 1990 meeting and Mr. Erno seconded. Upon a voice vote the motion passed unanimously. APPEAL 16-90, ART DYER - Vice Chairman O'Neil stated this appeal was deferred for 1 month. He read the appeal for Arthur D. Dyer, W208 S8903 Hillendale Drive, requesting 20 foot rear offset variance to construct a second garage structure in EA toning. He asked Mr. Lee to explain EA zoning. Mr. Lee stated HA is Exclusive Agricultural requiring a 30' offset variance. Mr. Dyer wishes to construct this structure 10' from the lot line. He needs a 20' variance to do so. Vice Chairman O'Neil asked Mr. Dyer to explain his request and hardship. Mr. Dyer said he has staked the area for the garage so as not to interfere with his driveway and ponds. He said there is a 60 acre corn field next door; he doesn't see any development in the near future due to the lack of sewers, etc. Vice Chairman O'Neil asked if there were any residents present? Mr. Kenneth Purdy, W208 S8543 Hillendale Drive stated he is the neighbor to the north and has concerns about the ponds, inaccurate sketches submitted at the last meeting, number of unfinished buildings and previous owners problems with the area. Mr. Dyer responded that he has been very ill recently and is now trying to finish obtaining the necessary permits from the Building Inspection office. He had been told by the previous owner that permits had been paid for and Mr. Lee told him they had not. Just recently he has received the necessary sanitary permit from Waukesha County, which will enable the Building Inspection Department to issue a building permit. Mr. Purdy questioned the type of zoning that permits two homes, one barn with living quarters above and a shed? Mr. Dyer responded that he intends to use the new shed to store horse saddles, etc. (tack room), cars and tractor. He commented that he has had to suffer hardships from the mistakes made by the previous owner. He is suing the owner for several reasons. Mr. Purdy said he wants a good neighbor and if this area is the only place Mr. Dyer can put his shed, he doesn't object. Pg. 2, Board of Appeals Minutes 7/26/90 Kra. Posbrig asked Mr. Dyer if the stakes he had out last month were still in the same place? He stated they were. He plans to install a new driveway. He stated there wouldn't be any living quarters above the shed. Mr. Lee asked Mr. Dyer if there was a spring to the east of the property? Mr. Dyer responded there was and that was the reason for not moving it further east. Mr. Purdy said the previous owner and Mr. Dyer had wanted to buy a 100' strip of land belonging to Mr. Purdy just north of where this shed is to be built, but they couldn't come to terms. Vice Chairman O'Neil told Mr. Dyer he could call the Building Inspection office in the morning or wait for the response to be mailed to him within five (5) days. MUSKEGO MARINE'S REQUEST FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION - Mr. Lee stated at he had received correspondence (copies-alstributed to Board members) from Duaine H. Langfeldt stating business is poor and he requests another year to remove the shed. He intends to asphalt. Vice -Chairman O'Neil asked Mr. Lee if they can act on this request tonight? He responded that they could since it was a matter of voting on overriding a decision not the zoning code. Mr. Erno asked Mr. Lee if it is near the fence and whether the Fire Department has a problem with the location? Mr. Lee responded that he had not heard any complaints and sees no problem with the location. Mrs. Posbrig made a motion to grant an extension to remove the shed until June 1, 1991 and Mr. O'Neil seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to grant the extension passed unanimously. The Board remained in Open Session. APPEAL 16-90 DYER - There was some discussion concerning the location _oT the house, water and future development in the area nearby. Mr. Erno made a motion to grant the appeal as requested. The hardship being the location of the existing ponds, driveway and house. Mrs. Posbrig seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: Mrs. Posbrig made a motion to adjourn at 8:05 P.M. and Mr. Erno seconded. Upon a voice vote the motion to adjourn passed unanimously. Respectfully Submitted Cheryl Schmidt Recording Secretary /cs Ju.Ly 31, 1990 Ain. AAthuA D. Dyen W208 S8903 HiLeendate Dtive Muskego, Wisconsin 53150 DeaA Aft. Dyers: The Board of Appeals wishes to advise you that your request for a 20 Aoot teat oAAset yand.ance to cons-ttuct a Aor•0Pd gaAagO s.tAuctune at W208 S8903 Hittendate Dtive, luskepo, WI has been gAavt.ted as Aeques,ted. '"hank vou. Sincerely, BOARD OF APPEALS Cheryl Schmidt Recording Secretary cds cc: Chak.nman Genatd FohA Pt, 2, Board of Appeals Minutes 6/28/90 intentions and hardship. Mr. Marsh stated that he needs this structure or he'll need to construct another shed. He has a 20' x 22' detached �arage on the property now, which he would tear down. He doesn t want his shed and will tear that down also. He would rather have an attached garage. There was some discussion about moving the driveway to the garage 13' off the lot line. Mr. Marsh was in agreement with that suggestion. His hardship is the location of the house. Mr. Earl Beilfuss, a neighbor of S75 W21015 Field Dr�ve was present and stated he had no objection to the structure.,;rChairman Fohr told Mr. Marsh he could call the Building Inspection office in the morning or wait for the decision to be mailed to him within five days. / APPEAL 16-90 - ARTHUR D. DYER - Chairman Fohr read the appeal for Mr. Dyer, W208 S8903 Hi endale Drive requesting 20' rear offset variance to construct a second garage structure. Chairman Fohr said that he knew there was a family emergency at the Dyer household, so the fact that Mr. Dyer wasn't present would indicate he wasn't coming. Mr. Fohr made a motion to defer to the next BOA meeting in July. Mr. O'Neil seconded. Upon a voice vote the motion to defer passed unanimously. APPEAL 17-90 - ROBERT k PAMELA ZALAR - Chairman Fohr read the appeal or Mr. Mrs. Zalar, W170 S7 Meadow Drive requesting a 16' setback variance to construct a new residence with an attached garage. Chairman Fohr requested Mr. Lee explain what the RS-2 zoning involves. Mr. Lee said the zoning is for single family residential and this lot was attached to the lot to the north. They are requesting access off Meadow Drive for their driveway. Their required 40' setback is from Briargate Lane. Chairman Fohr asked Mr. Zalar to state his intentions and hardship. Mr. Zalar said he never realized he need 40' off the other street -- his surveyor brought this to his attention. He mailed a letter from two nearby property owners, Mr. Norman A. Heikkinen, W170 S7280 Meadow Drive and the Gregg Erickson's, W170 S7281 Meadow Drive, who stated they have no objections to the 16' setback variance request for this lot and would be an asset to the subdivision. This letter was mailed to the Board members with their meeting packets. Mr. Heikkinen was present and again expressed his support for the variance. Mr. Zalar said his hardship was the type of house he wishes to construct on the lot and the aesthetics for the front of the house off Meadow Drive. Chairman Fohr informed Mr. Zalar he could call the Building Inspection office in the morning or wait for the decision to be mailed to him within five days. APPEAL 18-90 - ROBERT ROSS - Chairman Fohr read the appeal for Robert Ross, S71 W19998 Williams Drive requesting a 10' offset variance (north property line) to construct a detached garage, Chairman Fohr told the members that Mr. Lee had already given them the zoning information for RS-2. He asked Mr. Ross to tell the members his intentions and hardship for this appeal. Pg. 4, BOA, 6/28/90 APPEAL 15-90-DYER-Chairman Fohr made a motion to postpone (defer) this appeal or 1 month and to send a letter to the applicant asking him to clarify this is the house on the sketch for the appeal. Mr. O'Neil seconded. Upon a voice vote the motion to defer passed unanimously. APPEAL 17-90-ZALAR-After some discussion Mr. Berken made a motion to approve the appeal as submitted. The hardship being the configuration of the lot as a result of the dedication of additional road bed. Mr. O'Neil seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously. APPEAL 18-90-ROSS-Chairman Fohr said the swale should not be interrupted. He needs to build the garage away from the Swale. He has a dry lot. Mr. O'Neil made a motion to deny the appeal as submitted but approve a 5' offset variance to construct a detached garage. The hardship being the grade of the land to insure proper run-off of surface water. Mrs. Posbrig seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously. APPEAL 19-90-MICHLIG-After some discussion Mr. Berken made a motion to approve the appeal as submitted. The hardship being tho house would be the best architectural fit and compatible to homes in the neighborhood. Mr. O'Neil seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to adopt passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: Mr. Berken made a motion to Mr. O'Neil seconded. Upon passed unanimously. /cs adjourn the meeting at 9:30 P.M. and a voice vote the motion to adjourn Respectfully Submitted Cheryl Schmidt Recording Secretary Arthur D. Dyer 4208 S8903 Hillendale Drive Muskego, WTI June 11, 1990 To: City of Muskego, Board of Appeals I respectfully request that the 30 foot set -back for garages be changed to a 10 foot set -back on my property located at W-208 S8903 Hillendale Drive. `.Lhe reason for the request is because the physical layout of the property (per the attached survey), does not have roan for a garage within the noranal 30 foot set -back without placing it in the middle of the access driveway. The north boundary where I mould like the garage is next to a tree line whicn would cover the view of the garage. As well, tee land to the north is agricultural acreage and as such shouldn't be a probl—an as far as encroac!vTent. Thank you for your ti:-ne and consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted, 0� J- I Arthur D. Dyer ADD:bjd P-2024 $7.95 * Designed to fit the contemporary home * 300 sq. ft of loft area with a sloped roof running from a 4'high wall at the rear to a 91,z' wall at its front. iE .... ........ : ......... 0"'____' N P S NATIONAL PLAN SERVICE Design No. P-2024 PGA 9 11 L LA, I I LAA4. Plan carneg complete with: • Large, professional easy -to follow blueprints • Complete list of materials • Dimensional drawing of every detail • Rafter cutting template o ' 8 1 971 020-24" 1 6 PRNTED IN USA f a a got i a • s< m•_ a ll� � i s c < n m n g u a 0 mrn r n f x 3 m 0 I a Z u > e , � a� 0 m� OI � 01-22-a0 w 2677.05� A c -0 ! a0oa r - F9� 1Y ^ 9 O C � w R o� r rr � O •' m / m < V N \`� ♦ / 'A to n i a i St>• ? C N� O a On.O smo°• a r r mo V o V - - n m o an, 7A