Zoning Board of Appeals 11-1998CITY OF
USKEGO
December 11, 1998
Mr. Steven and Mr. Michael LeMaster
W 196 S8406 Plum Creek Blvd.
Muskego, WI 53150
RE: Appeal # 11-98
Dear Sirs:
DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING
Matthew G. Sadowski, AICP
Director of Planning
(414) 679-4136
r.
The Board of Appeals wishes to advice your two variance requested in regards to S69
=' W 17898 Muskego Drive, has been denied, due to lack of hardship.
3
Should you have any questions, please contact Matt Sadowski at 679-4136.
Sincerely,
C�
-3
Susan J. Schroe r
Recording Secretary
S8200 Racine Avenue 0 P.O. Box 749 • Muskego, Wisconsin 53150-0749 - Fax (414) 679-5614
Appeal #11-98
Steven and Michael L.eMaster
S69 W 17898 Muskego Drive
N4uskego, WI 53150
Tax Key No. 2176.025
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 17:3.08(1) Appeal
provisions, Petitioner seeks the following two (2) variances:
1. Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02(2) Building Location: No structure shall be erected,
structurally altered or relocated on a lot except within conformity with the district it is located. Petitioner
seeks a 1.84 foot variance to erect a principal structure (a single family residence) 25.66 from the
Muskego Drive right -of --way line. The Ordinance requires a 27.5 foot setback per 17:5.02(2)B.1,
17:8.08(3) and 17:9.07(3).
2. Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.07(1) Minimum Required Open Space: No building shall be
erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot so as to reduce the usable open area of such lot to less
than that specified by the regulations for that district. Petitioner seeks a 1,395 square foot variance to
erect a principal structure (a single family residence) and driveway leaving 6,105 square feet of open
space. The Ordinance requires 7,500 square feet of open space per 17:5.07 (1), 17:8.08(5) and 17:9.07(5).
Zoned: RS-3/OED, Suburban Residence District with an Existing Development Overlay
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Motion to approve as submitted. The hardship cited was the unique shape of the lot with two (2) setbacks, the
sewer easement and the well location.
ABSENT
• awu a vmm
DENIED
Member Brandt
DENIED
Member Conley (I st
DENIED
Member Le Doux (2nd Alt.)
BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES
CITY OF MUSKEGO
DECEMBER 10, 1998
CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Schneiker called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Vice Chairman Henry Schneiker, Mike Brandt, Dan Schepp, William LeDoux, Kristy Rogers, David
Conely and Director of Planning Matt Sadowski.
ABSENT: Chairman O'Neal
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE: Secretary reported notice was given November 25, 1998, in accordance
with Open Meeting Laws.
MINUTES: Dan Schepp made a motion to approve July 23, 1998, minutes as corrected. David Conely seconded,
upon voice vote, motion carried. Dan Schepp made a motion to approve August 27, 1998, minutes as submitted.
David Conely seconded, upon voice vote, motion carved.
OLD BUSINESS: Signing of decision letters for the July 23, 1998 and August 27, 1998, meetings.
NEW BUSINESS: Appeal #11-98 Steven and Michael LeMaster, S69 W17898 Muskego Drive, Tax Key No.
2176.025 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 17:3.08(1) Appeal
Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following two (2) variances: 1. Chapter 17--Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02(2)
Building Location: No structure shall be erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except within conformity
with the district it is located. Petitioner seeks a 1.84 foot variance to erect a principal structure (a single family
residence) 25.66 from the Muskego Drive right-of-way line. The Ordinance requires a 27.5 foot setback per
17:5.02(2)B.1, 17:8.08(3) and 17:9.07(3). 2. Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance,: Section 5.07(1) Minimum Required
Open Space: No building shall be erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot so as to reduce the usable open
area of such lot to less than that specified by the regulations for that district. Petitioner seeks a 1,395 square foot
variance to erect a principal structure (a single family residence) and driveway leaving 6,105 square feet of open
space. The Ordinance requires 7,500 square feet of open space per 17:5.07 (1), 17:8.08(5) and 17:9.07(5). Zoned:
RS-3/OED, Suburban Residence District with an Existing Development Overlay
Mr. Brandt administered an oath to Mr. Steven and Mr. Michael LeMaster. Mr. Steven LeMaster stated this is a lot
in an older area that has been unable to sell for two to three years. When they purchased the lot they were informed
that it is a buildable lot. Mr. Michael LeMaster stated there are neighbors on this block that are closer to the road
than what is being proposed. Also, the barn on this property will be removed. The neighbors have no objections to
the proposed house.
Plan Director Matt Sadowski explained the offsets and setbacks for this property, stating discounts have been given
to this lot because of the lot size and averaging granted because of the other homes on this street being closer to the
street Iot lines. Also, Mr. Sadowski explained the open space area required in this district and the discounts already
given to this parcel.
Mr. LeDoux made a motion to accept Appeal 11-98 as submitted. Mr. Schepp seconded. After discussion it was
determined that other building designs could be developed which may conform to district requirements. As such the
Board finds no hardship. Upon roll call vote, motion was denied 6-0.
ADJOURN: With no further business to come before this Board, Mr. Schepp made a motion to adjourn at 7:50
BOA 12na98
Page 2
P.M. Mr. LeDoux seconded. Upon voice vote, motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan J. Schroeder, Recording Secretary
CITY OF MUSKEGO
BOARD OF APPEALS
Application for Variance
Applicants Name i� M 1cUAE1- Lc --
Subject Property Address: S W1 L<J 178q4? MUSc7 LAJ
Telephone
Property Zoning 'Z -3���7 Key #_2�,1 1 6 lJ q � _
Petitioner's relationship to property (circle applicable):
owner lessee other 150tis � Cn,a�+as�� eF OwNY—�2
Fees: $195.00
Date inspector denied permit:
Requesting variance to Section �� 3_3 f `�•� ? 1
To allow: OF A
Va C- �/mPivs N1 �NQ
i e1
A literal enforcement of the terms of the above -referenced section
would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship
because:
Op iQ
The variance, if granted, will not be contrary to the public
interest and will be in accord with the spirit of the code because:
t'I fSlJr4C-Y 7CC;;;2Q �-,/
V �DivT�irr�
.De-
s
The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect public safety
or jeopardize public welfare because:
Steven LeMaster
September 17, 1998
City of Muskego
Muskego, Wi 53150
ATTENTION: Board of Appeals
SUBJECT: LOT IN MUSKEGO SHORES
Dear Board:
1 am writing this letter to request a variance on set -back requirements for the subject lot owned by
my parents; Robert & Mary LeMaster. We propose to build a modest BiLevel home on this lot
per the drawings attached. (48' x 28') This home will be pleasing to the eye and add value to our
great community. We do not wish to build something that looks unacceptably narrow and
downgrade existing surrounding homes. The width of this home is in accordance with today's
contemporary designs and will not portray the "cottage" style or size home..
The actual footprint for the foundation is 26' with a 2' overhang for architectural purposes and to
allow minimum bedroom sizes. We plan to keep existing trees and grass areas to be used by the
homeowner's family. We have discussed this with several surrounding neighbors and obtained
their agreement. Specifically to the West and South of the lot. My father actually lived in or built
3 homes that surround this lot so our intentions are only for the betterment of the area.
Please grant us this variance so we can get going before the winter.
Thank You,
S� cerely,
-M".J /.,y,1--C,
Steven R. LeMaster
Michael LeMaster
679-9665
fax679-7880
I`
W 196 S8406 Plum Creek Ct., Muskego, Wi. 53150
i
i 0
I
�y
N
J
r
W
' 1 �.� .."•i ...i r y I X II 1II III ! I I I rinmi ejii ii�ulry r rn;�^I T V `M •` +`+�� ,, Y
I r. _ � � .. I�XI� II i..` � .,.,k f ;'l+iling.� Yi.•N!l'1f' ' Ali a
91ii m Ifl I rii Mri. rl r .� / /
Z)C� I_
Lower Level .
't
- � t, ,•.ins
Nk
Enchanting Entry
r. Lipper floor: 1,331 sq. ft.
,> Lower Ioor: 663 sq, 1t.
Garage:: 581 sq. fi.
-iulal living Bred: 1,994 Sq. It.
TA
tad* Price Lode:
'' `• ■ This plait features:
— Three bedrooms
wksr ,
— Two full and one halt' baths
' Floor Plan ■ Split Entry leads down to Family Room,
Ufilily Room, Den, halfbath and two -
car Garage
■ Up a half -flight of stairs leads to the
pop 11dw large Living Room highlighted by a
t double window
■ Dining Room convenient to Living
Room and Kitchen
�14mlly Fim: ■ Efficient Kitchen with rear yard aaccess
j#-4 11 and room for eating
■ Corner Master Bedroom offers an over-
sized closet and private bath
■ Two additional bedrooms wills double
ZIP,aQ a � windows, share a full bath
HOME Cos tAmULAtiR
see order Pages for details
13
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA REQUIREMENT
LEvr_ I
I
I I
i
RAhiCH / Level 1 must equal the minimum required floor
area.
(POSED RANCH / Minimum required floor area minus Level 1
iltiplied by 1 1/2 equals the sq.ft. requirement for Level
. (All sq. footage on Level 2 must be 4 ft. above grade.
STORY / Minimum required floor area minus Level 1
tiplied by 1 1/2 equals the sq.ft. requirement for Level
8I-LEVEL / Minimum required floor area minus Level 1
multiplied by 1 1/2 equals the sq.ft. requirement for Level
LEYEc- 2 2. (All sq. footage on Level 2 must be 4 ft. above grade)
I ;
L .— k.EVEL
TRI-LEVEL / Minimum required floor area minus (Level-2 and
Level 3) multiplied by 1 1/2 equals the sq. ft. requirement
for Level 1. (All sq. footage on Level 3 must be 4 ft.
LEVEL 3 above grade.
4- LEVEL 2
L LE— I — —�
NOTES:
1. Any home not having a basement of at least 300 sq.ft. must
add 200 sq.ft. to the minimum floor area.
2. In any case where the Principal Floor Area is less than
1000 sq.ft., an attached garage, breezeway, porch or other
enclosed area shall be required to that the total ground area
covered in not less than 1000 sq.ft.
n
I �
�a
xx
z.
"1
r /
N •
y..
LLJ
OL
.
I
J �
LLU
W W
z L/Z
a
■
N-
a �
J •-
i
S
H ?
L
4K*
0;
R /
• r
mac. t9
K