Zoning Board of Appeals- - Minutes 12/8/2005ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
FINDINGS OF FACTS
A dimensional variance is hereby granted to Thomas Sauer, by the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the City of Muskego in Appeal #09-2005 to permit a boathouse with a height
of 18.5 with an area of 968 square feet, permitting a 3.5-foot height variance and a 433
square foot variance at W187 S7160 Gold Drivel Tax Key No. 2175.996, based upon
the applicant having met the specifics of the City Ordinance with respect to granting
variances.
It was found that the variance preserves the intent of the Municipal Code because there
were exceptional conditions applying that do not generally apply to other properties.
More specifically, the granting of the variance will give the property owner storage of
boats and boating equipment, as there is no garage or basement on the property for
storage. Also, the additional square footage will serve as a storm shelter since the
residence does not have a basement. Additionally, the property rights of other property
owners are preserved, and no detriment is caused to adjacent properties.
Dated this 215t day of December 2005.
Signed I
Dan Schepp
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Signed
Kellie Renk
Recording Secretary
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES
CITY OF MUSKEGO
DECEMBER 8, 2005
Meeting was called to order at 7:08 P.M
PRESENT: Chairman Dan Schepp, Dr. Barb Blumenfield, Mr. Horst Schmidt, Dr. Russ Kashian (7:12
PM), Mr. William Le Doux, Mr. Richard Ristow and Associate Planner Adam Trzebiatowski.
EXCUSED: Vice Chairman Schneiker
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE: The Secretary stated the meeting was noticed on December 2,
2005, in accordance with Open Meeting Laws.
NEW BUSINESS: APPEAL #08-2005 Petitioner: Michael Birkley, W144 S7931 Durham Dr/Tax Key No.
2213.984. REQUESTING under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.08(1) Appeal
Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following variance: Chapter 17- Zoning Ordinance: Section 6.03
Conditional Uses (1)A. Appeal Required: Uses listed as permitted by conditional grant may be permitted
in the district in which listed upon petition for such grant to the Plan Commission and subject to the
approval of the Plan Commission and to such other conditions as hereinafter designated.
A conditional use grant was denied for the above -mentioned property on September 6, 2005, for the
operation of a Tree Service/Landscape business. The petitioner is seeking an appeal regarding the Plan
Commission denial of the Conditional Use Grant.
Chairman Schepp explained the Board received a second request to defer the appeal to the next regular
meeting. There is no new information submitted. Dr. Blumenfield questioned why the petitioner is
requesting this item be deferred again. Attorney Richard Zaffiro, representing Mr. Birkley, explained he
has been retained by Mr. Birkley only eight days ago and is trying to get up to speed. Atty. Zaffiro further
explained Mr. Birkley is looking at different options that may not require an appeal being granted and he
is trying to reach a settlement without litigation. Atty. Zaffiro stated Mr. Birkley has also contacted a
realtor and is trying to find another location for the business.
Dr. Kashian questioned who Mr. Birkley's attorney was at the last meeting. Atty. Zaffiro explained Mr.
Birkley had issues that he could not resolve with the fast Attorney and did not retain him. Atty. Zaffiro
stated he was not able to argue this appeal tonight. Dr. Kashian stated the appellant has had sufficient
amount of time to discuss this issue.
Mr. Le Doux moved to grant one last deferral to appeal 08-2005 to the regular meeting in January.
Dr. Blumenfield seconded. Dr. Blumenfield explained a resolution would be better for the City than
litigation. Dr. Blumenfield further explained if the board were to defer this item, this would be the last
deferral. Dr. Kashain stated he does not agree with deferring this appeal for the second time. Dr. Kashian
explained the appellant requested the City to place this item on the agenda and he should be prepared to
present his case. Upon a roll call vote appeal 08-2005 is deferred 4-1 with Dr. Kashian voting no.
APPEAL #09-2005 Petitioner: Thomas Sauer, W187 S7160 Gold Drivel Tax Key No. 2175.996.
REQUESTING under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.08 (1) Appeal Provisions,
Petitioner seeks the following variances: Chapter 17- Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 — Height. (1)
Maximum Height Restricted: In any district no building or structure shall be hereafter erected or
structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations for that district,
except as may be modified by Section 17:4.02(2)(B)(3)(c), Chapter 17: Section 9.04(B)(3)(b) states that a
boathouse cannot be higher than 15 feet from the lowest grade. The appellant is requesting to build a
boathouse with a height of 18.5 feet, and is therefore requesting a 3.5-foot variance to the Code
requirement. Chapter 17-Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 Accessory Uses and Structures (1 )(A) Any
accessory use or structure shall conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located
except as specifically otherwise provided. Chapter 17: Section 9.04(B)(3)(c) states that a boathouse
cannot be greater in size than 525 square feet.
ZBA Minutes
12/08/2005
Page 2
The appellant is requesting to build a two-story boathouse totaling 968 square feet, and is therefore
requesting a 443 square foot variance to the Code requirement.
Dr. Blumenfield swore in Thomas Sauer, Mr. Sauer explained the property is in a unique location. There
is no basement, no crawl space, no attic and no garage for storage. Mr. Sauer stated he has boating
equipment, yard equipment and lawn equipment that he would like to store inside the proposed 2-story
boathouse. Mr. Sauer currently has a 10x20 off -site storage unit that he uses to store these items in. Mr.
Sauer noted he does not have a storm shelter in the house so he will be using the a concrete block room
within the boathouse as a storm shelter.
Mr. Schmidt questioned if there will be living quarters in the boathouse. Mr. Sauer stated there will not be
living quarters and the air conditioning is for climate control for storage. Mr. Sauer explained he is trying
to match the roof line of the house and the aesthetics of the house with the boathouse.
Mr. Sauer explained a garage would not be possible on his property within the 70-foot setbacks.
Mr. Schmidt asked the petitioner if he would like the Board to defer this item to allow him time to discuss
options with the City staff. The petitioner stated he has already looked at the other options with staff.
Mr. Schepp noted there are no overhead doors in the plans for the boathouse. Dr. Blumenfield
questioned if a boat will be stored in the boathouse. Mr. Sauer stated possibly in the future he will store a
boat inside but not right away. The Board discussed storing other items than boating equipment and yard
equipment. Mr. Trezebiatowski noted approval of this variance does not allow any specific uses other
than boathouse related storage uses.
Mr. Sauer stated he is out on a peninsula and the nearest neighbor is 600 feet away.
Mr. Sauer noted the hardships are having no basement for storage and no shelter from storms.
Dr. Blumenfield swore in Neil Borgman, District 3 Alderman. Ald. Borgman stated the property is unique
and safety is a concern during storms with having no shelter. Ald. Borgman stated he is in favor of the
variance.
Mr. Trezbiatowski gave the City's opinion. The petitioner currently has a residence on his property with
no outbuildings. The petitioner is requesting to build a boathouse on his property. In the QLS district, two
of the specific code requirements are height- not greater than 15-feet above the lowest grade, and area —
no greater than 525 square feet. Since the boathouse is a two-story building, the floor area is being
doubled. When floor area is ca4culated it includes all usable area of a structure. The Zoning Code
definition for floor are is the square footage of floor space within the outside walls, including the total of all
space on all floors of al building or structure. Also, since this is being called a boathouse, the uses
related to the structure are explained in our code. The definition of a boat house is a detached accessory
structure located close to the ordinary high water mark and designed and used principally for the storage
of boats and accessory marine equipment normally used in the daily activities of lakefront property and
which typically includes a large overhead door for primary access on the side of the structure facing the
water.
Since this building has to be used principally for boats and marine accessories, two stories are not
necessary. The first floor of the boathouse can be enlarged to 525 square feet without a variance. There
is the option that the petitioner could have a one-story structure with a gabled roof and then have storage
trusses in the attic area that would not count towards the floor area of the boathouse. This then would
create some additional storage space for the petitioner. If the petitioner would chose to go with the one-
story boathouse, then this would eliminate the need for a height variance.
In all, predominantly residential zoning districts have the 15-foot limit for the height of accessory
structures. There are bonuses that can allow taller accessory structures when the proposed structures
ZBA Minutes
12/0812005
Page 3
are being placed a greater distance from the lot lines or in the case of larger lots. The Zoning Code
states that boathouses are not allowed any height bonuses.
If this variance is granted or if the plans are altered to conform to all of the code requirements, a revised
survey will need to be submitted for building permits showing the exact Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHWM), the exact distance from the boathouse to the OHWM, and proof that the parcel/structure is not
within the 100 year flood plain. Also, as per the SW zoning district, a Conditional Use Grant (CUG) needs
to be approved for the boathouse before any building permits can be issued. CUG's are handled through
the Planning Commission. The Planning Department can assist with more information if that time arises.
Staff is recommending denial of Appeal 09-2005, allowing a boathouse with a height of 18.5, a 3.5-foot
variance, and denial of a boathouse with an area of 968 square feet, a 433 square foot variance, citing
that the variances does not preserve the intent of the Zoning Ordinance because there are not
exceptional conditions applying to the parcel that do not apply to other properties. Also, a non -self
imposed hardship is not found for the appeal.
There are other options for a boathouse on this property. A 525 square foot boathouse is allowed on this
property that would not require a variance. Also, two stories are not necessary for the storage of boats
and marine accessories. There is the option of having a one-story boathouse with a gable roof with
storage trusses to increase the allowed storage area.
DELIBERATIONS:
APPEAL 09-2005 — Dr. Kashian moved to approve appeal 09-2005-1 allowing a boathouse with a
height of 18.5, a 3.5-foot variance. Seconded by Dr. Blumenfield. Mr. Schepp noted he is in favor of
granting the appeal based on the fact there are no nearby neighbors that would be affected by the height
and the hardship on the property owner of having no area for storage. Dr. Blumenfield agreed and added
the boathouse will also be used as a storm shelter, which is a safety issue. Upon a roll call vote Appeal
09-2005-1 is approved 5-0.
Mr. Schmidt moved to approve appeal 09-2005-1A allowing a boathouse with an area of 968
square feet, a 433 square foot variance. Seconded by Dr. Blumenfield. Dr. Blumenfield noted she is
in favor of granting the appeal based on the hardship of the uniqueness of the property, no garage for
storage and no shelter in a storm, and added, as long as the boathouse is used for purpose intended.
Upon a roll call vote Appeal 09-2005-1A is approved 5-0.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Schmidt moved to approve the minutes of October 27, 2005.
Seconded by Mr. Le Doux. Motion carried 5-0.
MISCELLANEOUS: None.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before this Board, Dr. Blumenfield moved to
adjourn, Dr. Kashian seconded. Upon voice vote, meeting adjourned at 8:50 PM.
Respectful Submitted,
I �
Kel ie Renk,
Recording Secretary
CITY OF MUSKEGO
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA
December 8, 2005 7:00 PM
Muskego City Hall, Muskego Room, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Appeals of the City of Muskego may convene, upon
passage of the proper motion, into closed session pursuant to Section 19.85 (1) (a) of the State
Statutes for the purpose of deliberating concerning cases which were the subject of a quasi-judicial
hearing; said cases being the appeals described below. The Board of Appeals will then reconvene
into open session.
OLD BUSINESS
1. APPEAL #08-2005
Petitioner: Michael A. Birkley
Property: W144 S7931 Durham Drive I Tax Key No. 2213.984
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.08(1) Appeal Provisions,
Petitioner seeks the following variance:
Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 6.03 Conditional Uses
(1)A. Approval Required: Uses listed as permitted by conditional grant may be permitted in
the district in which listed upon petition for such grant to the Plan Commission and
subject to the approval of the Commission and to such other conditions as hereinafter
designated.
A conditional use grant was denied for the above -mentioned property on September 6, 2005 for the
operation of a Tree Service/Landscape business. The petitioner is seeking an Appeal regarding the
Plan Commission denial of the Conditional Use Grant. Detailed descriptions are available for public
inspection in the Planning Department. All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard.
NEW BUSINESS
1. APPEAL #09-2005
Petitioner: Thomas Sauer
Property: W 187 S7160 Gold Drive 1 Tax Key No. 2175.996
REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.08(1) Appeal
Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following variances:
ZBA 12/08/2005
Page 2
Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 - Height
(1) Maximum Height Restricted: In any district no building or structure shall be
hereafter erected or structurally altered to a height in excess of that
hereinafter specified by the regulations for that district, except as may be
modified by Section 17:4,05(2)(B)(3)(c).
Chapter 17: Section 9.04(B)(3)(b) states that a boathouse can not be higher than 15 feet from the lowest
grade. The appellant is requesting to build a boathouse with a height of 18.5 feet, and is therefore
requesting a 3.5-foot variance to the Code requirement.
Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 4.05 Accessory Uses and Structures
(1)(A) Any accessory use or structure shall conform to the applicable regulations
of the district in which it is located except as specifically otherwise
provided.
Chapter 17: Section 9.04(B)(3)(c) states that a boathouse can not be greater in size than 525 square feet.
The appellant is requesting to build a two-story boathouse totaling 968 square feet, and is therefore
requesting a 443 square foot variance to the Code requirement. Detailed descriptions are available for
public inspection in the Planning Department. All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be
heard.
CLOSED SESSION
OPEN SESSION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 27, 2005 MEETING.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
U a s111732.
It is possible that members of and possibly a quorum of members of other governmental bodies of the
municipality may be in attendance at the above -stated meeting to gather information; no action will be taken
by any governmental body at the above -stated meeting other than the governmental body specifically referred
to above in this notice.
Also, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through
appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Janice Moyer, City
Clerk/Treasurer at Muskego City Hall, (262) 679-5625.
City of Muskego
Staff Representative Brief
Zoning Board of Appeals Supplement 09-2005
For the meeting of: December 8, 2005
REQUESTING:
Under the direction of Chapter 17—Zoninq Ordinance: Section 5.03 - Height
(1) Maximum Height Restricted: In any district no building or structure shall be
hereafter erected or structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter
specified by the regulations for that district, except as may be modified by Section
17:4.05(2)(B)(3)(c).
And
Under the direction of Chapter 17—Zoninq Ordinance: Section 4.05 - Accessory Uses and Structures
(1)(A) Any accessory use or structure shall conform to the applicable regulations of the
district in which it is located except as specifically otherwise provided.
APPELLANT: Thomas Sauer
LOCATION: W 187 S7160 Gold Drive 1 Tax Key No. 2175.996
CITY'S POSITION PRESENTED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, City Staff Representative
BACKGROUND
The petitioner is proposing to construct a new boathouse on their property.
The parcel is zoned SW/OLS, Shoreland-Wetland District with a Lake Shore Overlay. The lot is located
off of Gold Drive, which is located near the western shore of Little Muskego Lake. The petitioner seeks
the following variances:
An exception to the maximum height requirement for boathouses in the OLS district.
Chapter 17: Section 9.04(B)(3)(b) states that a boathouse can not be higher than 15 feet from the lowest
grade. The appellant is requesting to build a boathouse with a height of 18.5 feet, and is therefore
requesting a 3.5-foot variance to the Code requirement.
And
An exception to the size limit for boathouses in the OLS district.
Chapter 17: Section 9.04(B)(3)(c) states that a boathouse can not be greater in size than 525 square feet.
The appellant is requesting to build a two-story boathouse totaling 968 square feet (484 square feet per
level), and is therefore requesting a 443 square foot variance to the Code requirement.
NOTE:
The boathouse is not shown the survey. Instead it is shown on page 4 of the building plans on a copied
version of the survey.
Appeal # 09-2005
ZBA 12-08-2005
Page 1
DISCUSSION
The petitioner currently has a residence on his property with no outbuildings. The petitioner is requesting
to building a boathouse on his property. In the OLS district, two of the specific code requirements are as
follows:
Height: not greater than 15 feet above the lowest grade.
Area: no greater than 525 square feet.
Since the boathouse being proposed is a two-story building, the floor area is being doubled. When floor
area is calculated it includes all usable area of a structure. Below is the Zoning code definition for floor
area.
Floor Area: The square feet of floor space within the outside line of walls, including the
total of all space on all floors of a building or structure.
Also, since this is being called at boathouse, the uses related to the structure are explained in our code.
The definition of a boathouse is given below.
Boat House: A detached accessory structure located close to the ordinary high water
mark and designed and used principally for the storage of boats and accessory marine
equipment normally used in the daily activities of lakefront property and which typically
includes a large overhead door for primary access on the side of the structure facing the
water.
Since this building has to be used principally for boats and marine accessories, two stories are not
necessary. The first floor of the boathouse can be enlarged to 525 square feet without a variance. There
is the option that the petitioner could have a one-story structure with a gabled roof and then have storage
trusses in the attic area that would not count towards the floor area of the boathouse. This then would
create some additional storage space for the petitioner. If the petitioner would chose to go with the one-
story boathouse, then this would eliminate the need for a height variance.
In all, predominantly residential zoning districts have the 15-foot limit for the height of accessory
structures. There are bonuses that can allow taller accessory structures when the proposed structures
are being placed a greater distance from the lot lines or in the case of larger lots. The Zoning Code states
that boathouses are not allowed any height bonuses.
NOTE:
If this variance is granted or if the plans are altered to conform to all of the code requirements, a revised
survey will need to be submitted for building permits showing the exact Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHWM), the exact distance from the boathouse to the OHWM (all illustrated by the surveyor on a
stamped survey), and proof that the parcel/structure is not within the 100 year floodplain. Also, as per the
SW zoning district, a Conditional Use Grant (CUG) needs to be approved for the boathouse before any
building permits can be issued. CUG's are handled through the Planning Commission. The Planning
Department can assist with more information if that time arises.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, THE CITY STAFF REPRESENITIVE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS:
Denial of Appeal 09-2005, allowing a boathouse with a height of 18.5, a 3.5-foot variance, and
denial of a boathouse with an area of 968 square feet, a 433 square foot variance, citing that the
variances does not preserve the intent of the Zoning Ordinance because there are not exceptional
conditions applying to the parcel that do not apply to other properties. Also, a non -self imposed
hardship is not found for the appeal.
There are other options for a boathouse on this property. A 525 square foot boathouse is allowed
on this property that would not require a variance. Also, two stories are not necessary for the
storage of boats and marine accessories. There is the option of having a one-story boathouse
with a gable roof with storage trusses to increase the allowed storage area.
Appeal # 09-2005
ZBA 12-08-2005
Page 2
Appeal #09-2005
Supplemental Map
LEGEND
Agenda Item(s)
Property
^� Right-of-way
Hydrography
CITY OF Prepared by
Cky aF Muskego
o �;;zoop t[sxfiG
Petitioner:
2175.996
Thomas Sauer
W187 S7160 Gold Drive
Area of Interest
at
PROPOSED BOAT
HOUSE SITE
_1. �+. �.1�•�•' .. fie"- ".
.41051-110 F W---
/- *- . r
/�+iw.�• � y is���`.I+ r ,`sue _ � , ��+
114
17
� - `NI f • - � � i�
b • Pi7WO5ED BOW •..
HOUSE SITE 3r
:i 'J :7!� � � V � 1 Z � � � ��♦t �`�r.� may' � 1 ��V_ ���
• -' Y.p' ��_' �- 'yt14 w'��r�-.�� ]-;..'+v.. -r /Y Il '•� [Y�rM,�� r 1
4 ��. w r � it Y . � * I•r•`^6'�' ,�I�,f 'T � ��'�T�• .�kr ��:
To Zoning Board of Appeals
Re: Boat house variance for property w187 s7160 Gold Dr.
l am requesting a variance to the boat house ordinance 41082-10-18-2001 which states a boat house cannot be
more than 15' in height. The variance 1 am requesting is for an additional 3.5 feet to accommodate a second
floor. There is also a question as to whether the square footage of a boat house is based on foot print or overall
floor space. If it is determined that the square footage is based on overall floor space then a secondary
variance is requested for the additional square footage of a second floor.
The reason i am interested in building a boat house is mainly for storage of boats, boating equipment as well
as other items typical of a lake property. The secondary reason is for the storage of lawn and garden
equipment, patio furniture, and general household items. Due to the uniqueness of the property and how the
home was built there is zero storage space. The home could not be build with a basement or any space for
storage in a crawl space, it's a ranch home with flat roof so there is no attic space. There is also no garage of
any kind on property. The only option we have is to make frequent trips to a rented 20x40 storage unit which
continues to be more and more of a hardship. We could build the boat house with a hip or gabled roof which
would give us attic space without having to request a variance but that type of architecture would not match
with the architecture of the current structure.
We have no neighbors and wouldn't effect any other lake home owners view. The nearest house that would
even be able to see the boat house is over '/, mile away across the bay on the northwest side of the lake (at the
end of Hillview Dr.). The negative impact of this structure on the area around the property will be minimal if
there is any. The positive impact on living conditions for me and my family would be dramatic.
Your serious and sincere consideration of this matter is greatly appreciated.
Tom Sauer
CITY OF MUSKEGO BOARD OF APPEALS
APPLICATION FOR DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE
Appellant's Name: _ roNA - <SAUf--12
Subject Property Address: 1&7 ► ) JZ.
Telephone: Day: S) Q 72- 7 Z Evening: S.4 oA t=
Property Zoning: I
Petitioner's relationship to property (circle applicable):
Owner Lessee
rr
Tax Key: EASY-C-Z I7 5Gct (,o
Other
Date inspector denied zoning permit:
Requesting variance to Code Section 9', aL4 /OPM* 103 z - I D - 18
A literal enforcement of the terms of the above -referenced section would result in
practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship because: 7744 T L1UvSE W.,I l
1 W! N 6)VC — V -- A 'J,
S C 41
W ► M)tj Wr ! I 14110 w F-62 h4 vim! A]6"j64 5-) CALCie .
The variance, if granted, will not be contrary to the public interest and will be in accord
with the spirit of the code because: 2 S i n! C
&110VU.&0i-' 70 t$ `- r l f ? - S
:ZqIFc c
The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect public safety or jeopardize public
welfare because: =!Ye QQp3j IB W/ 1 I AM 7` �j/A -Tn -Yr4 C-
ll n611V W-S%P�Je
S:1 !TYiALL1Plannin 1FORMS1BOA-iimensi�n�! Appeal A'�lirt�n.��c —J
Last printed 6/24/2004 8:47 AM
f
00V -�+�
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DIMENSIONAL, VARIANCE REQUESTS
At the direction of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the following information is required to
be submitted with the application (10 copies of each):
• For any variance pertaining to a parcel of land, a Plat of Survey, prepared by a
Registered Land Surveyor, must be submitted. The Plat of Survey must be
dated, with no time requirements, and include the original seal of the surveyor.
Plat of Survey must contain the following:
1. The parcel in question with dimensions, bearings and a description of the
exterior boundaries.
2. Abutting streets, properties, lakes and/or rivers, etc.
3. Location and size (with dimensions and area) of any existing buildings or
structures.
4. Ordinary High-water Mark, 100-year Flood Elevation, 2-foot about the 100-
year Flood Elevation, Easements, etc.
5. Location and size of culverts, ditches, trees, wells, septic system, retaining
walls, driveways, sidewalks, patios, or any other items pertinent to the
variance requested —including area calculations.
6. Elevations at corners of parcel, building comers, grade breaks and any other
elevations pertinent to the variance requested.
7. Proposed building, structure or appurtenance for which the variance is being
requested.
IF The scaled construction drawings of the appurtenance, addition, or structure for
which the variance is being requested.
■ Fee in the amount of $200.00 Account # 100.01:18:03.4327
SIGNATURE OF APPELIT DATE I I - I -y S
SIGNATURE OF OWNER (if different)
DATE
PLEASE BE INFORMED THAT ANY LEGAL, ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
FEES INCURRED BY THE CITY, IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING A PROPOSAL OR
APPLICATION, BUT NOT INCLUDED IN THIS FEE SCHEDULE, WILL BE CHARGED
BACK TO THE PETITIONER I APPLICANT I OWNER 1 DEVELOPER FOR 100%
RECOVERY. (Ch. 3.08510rd. 9908)
S:ICITYHALL Planning\FORMSIBOA-Dimensional Appeal Application.doc
Last printed 6/24/2004 8:47 AM
318" EXT. PLYWD
SOFFIT -
TREATED 2"x6" OVER
2"x4" DOUBLE DECK
TOP RAIL
TREATED 2"x2"
DECK SPINDLES
SPACING PER CODE)
TREATED 5/4"x6"
DECKING
TREATED DECK STAIRS
(GRADE TO DETERMINE
EXACT # OF RISERS)
1"x12" R.SAWN CEDAR
FASCIA w.1 1 "x4' OVER
TREATED 2"x6" OVER
2"x4" DOUBLE DECK
TOP RAIL
TREATED 4"x4"
RAILING POSTS
TREATED 2"x2"
DECK SPINDLES
SPACING PER CODE)
TREATED DECK BEAM
TREATED 6"x6"
DECK POSTS
DUAL SPOTS
SWITCH LOC. TO
BE DETERMINED
L___1_____________________________________________
RUBBER ROOF
1"x12' R.SAWN CEDAR
FASCIA w.1 1 "x4" OVER
2"X6" ROUGH SAWN
CEDAR CORNER BROS
& WINDOW TRIM
DIMENSIONAL
- ASPHALT SHINGLES
OVER EYEBROW ROOF
REAR ELEVATION
DRIVE SIDE
1"x8" R.SAWN CEDAR EAST
FASCIA w.l 1"x3" OVER
EYEBROW ROOF
1"X8" ROUGH SAWN
BEVEL CEDAR SIDING
w / 6" EXPOSURE
318" EXT. PLYWD
-- SOFFIT
1 "X8" ROUGH SAWN
BEVEL CEDAR SIDING
w.16" EXPOSURE
2"X6' ROUGH SAWN
CEDAR CORNER BROS.
& WINDOW TRIM
FRONT ELEVATION
DWELLING SIDE
WEST
___-------- --- _---------- ---------- _ --- -_--- __--- _--- __. - ---------------------
L____,
1 22'-0"
69 011
E
n
J
n
26'-011
22'-011 41-011
6o
1-Q" 1 "
FUR -OUT BL'K WALL low
�J 1 0"
w.l SIDING OVER - 1"
10" i
2"x4"-16' o,c. FRAMED
�- WALLS wd 1/2" OSB STORM
SHEATHING SHELTER
r-7 314' HIGH FROM 11 - CRS OF 10"8,-0" �,�„ !
TOP OF CURB CONC. BL.K r —
REINFORCE BL K WALL
w.1 #6 STL RODS SPACED 10" !
11 718" - 16" o.c. 64" o.c. MAX.
'A TJI JOISTS L 2'-8" STL
ABOVEjx DOOR j
1
2 }
m I
o
NBOAT HOUSE N DECK STAIRS1
N CONC SLAB SLOPEM M PA 1 0DRS tr GRADE TO DETERMINE
ExAC'I' / OP RISERS
' I
--------------- ----- -----
cc
o_ I
0 O
;o I
N" I
I PROVIDE R.O. FORS
FUTURE 8'-0"xr-0" O.H.
2'-6" 2-1 314" x 9 114' GARAGE DOORS
MICROLAM HDR
V-0' SL. GL. PATIO DOOR
I 6'-0" �.
11 718" - 16" o.c.
TJI JOISTS
ABOVE
I
I
I
2-1 3/4" x 9 114"
MICROLAM HDR _
3LJ PATIO DOOR _
CULTURED
101-011 6'-0"
STONE
VENEER
8'-7112" I 61-0,1
I 2"x8" - 6" o.c.
2-2"x10" TREATED TREATE JOISTS
I DECK BEAM AB VE
fth
Tj
112" DECK OUTLfNE fi"x8" TREATED DECK QUTLI
ABOVE POSTS ABOVE
A 112" 10W 112" L 10'-7 112" I 4'4r 4 112'
221-0" - 4'-0"
26'-0'1
22'-0"
T-7 314
281-0'1
uSE.ioisT 8'-0' SL.
LOWER PLAN
484 SO FT.
2-1 3!4" v Q 11A"
MICROLF
1'-1 314"
r-7 314"
6'-6"
4"
DETAIL -"A"
HOR WEIGHT @ LOWER
WINDOW
1_
1'4"
r-7 314"
L1 '-6-J
10 314"
1'-1 114'
7'-1' 6'-101I2"
�4" 4"
DETAIL-11B"
HDR HIEGHT @ LOWER LEVEL
PATIO DRS
PROVIDE R.O. FOR
FUTURE 6'-0"xr-0' O.H.
GARAGE DOORS
0
1'-10" _ -1'-10"
FLOATING
SLABLAB FOR
LOADING/SOIL �1�C
CONDITIONS
r-7 314"
DETAIL- "C"
HDR HJEGHT @ LOWER LEVEL
SERVICE DOOR
1 - CRS OF 10'
CONC. BL.K
FORCE BL'K WALL
STL RODS SPACED
64" o.c. MAX.
R-OUT BL'K WALL
u.1 SIDING OVER
22'h-0"
I
128'-0"
6-0"
Ri1
TREATED 514"x6"
DECKING -
TREATED 2"x6" OVER
2"x4" DOUBLE DECK
TOP RAIL
22'-O"
41
"V CH CV, -{J 6" 6t -6'r Y -V 1"x1b" R.SAWN CEDAR
DUSPOTS FASCIA w.l 1 "x4" OVER
H LOC. TO
I I (AL
gE DCETERNNED I
318" ROUGH SAWN
48"x24" SL. BY. 48"x24' SL. BY. 48"x24" 1 SL. BY. 112" OSB ROOFING EXT. PLYWOOD SOFFIT
wl H-CLIPS w/VENTING
Lul 6'-2" HIGH 12
PLATE HEIGHT 3,_3„ RUBBER ROOF 1----
36" FLOOR TO 1 i 718" - 16" o.c. TJI
BOTTOM OF
WINDOW MIN. _
R-38 HI -DENSITY
11 T18'JFTERS
6" o,c, BATTINSUL
TJI `a� . 112" DRYWALL w.l POLYWRAP1"X6"ROUGH SAWN
A$E BEVEL CEDAR SIDING
w.l 6' EXPOSURE
61-3" 112" OSB
6'-r SHEATHING
R
a W m w: POLYWRAP
O z' STORAGE N 314" T&G OSB 2"X4" - 16"o.c. STUDS
0 5 347TIUMMULIR, - SUBFLOOR (GLUED)
a
Or 10 DECKSTAI12 SM 11 718" -16" a.c. TJI
fi I GRADE To DETERMINE 22!-0"
o(ACTiaFR,SERS �5JW FIRESTOP R-19 SILL INSUL.-
DRYWALL
I
I z
I 28'-0"
CO)
314"
I 11 718'J
6"o.c.
TJI FTERS 4
ABVE us w USE TREATED
SOLE PLATES
REINFORCED CONC. SLAB SILL SEALER
OVER 5 MIL. VAPOR BARRIOR ANCHOR BOLTS
' $ {PER CODE} -
8'-0" HIGH
PLATE HEIGHT P
I g• 4- GRAVEL (MEN.) VARII=Y FLOATING
L.1t6"� SLAB FOR LOADING/SOIL
CONDITIONS
$'-0"L.GL. PA'fiObdCl#2 •x42 %.B . TYPICAL SECTION VIEW
/QUAL SPOTS
SWITCH LOC. TO
-a BE DETERMINED
6'-0"
WOOD
DECK
TREATED 4'x4' TREATED 2"x2"
RAILING POSTS DECK SPINDLES
��-O" SPACING PER CODE) 4'-0"
261-0"
UPPER PLA N
484 SQ, FT.
158 SQ. FT. DECK PLUS STAIRS
Izsa-
T'-7 314"
28'-0"
nn 26'-0'1
27-O" 41, 0"
6" 61-9"
6" 6" 10" 1"
3'-3"
Z-4 112" 6"
PROVINE
ANCHOR BOLTS . . . . . . 61_9" I 111-10" I I 11 6'=9"
�� .. (PER CODE} I`-1--1- I I
I I
.10,1
I _ . 11-10"
L - - - - -- -
I.
.-� I
6
--REINFORCED CONC, SLAB I
w.l # 10 6X6 WIRE MESH
OVER 5 MIL. VAPOR BARRIOR I I
CONC SLAB SLOPED -TO O.H. DRS i I
1l
�W I 1
-- --------- _ J'
OMIT CURB FOR 11�11 OMIT CURB FOR 6" 1
O-H. DOOR' O.H. DOOR I
1'-30` 8 -2}-11• -0 I
it
V- 1'-6"
81' 1 01-O"
8" 101-0"
22'-0" (j
2 6' - 611
8"
8" 31-4" 8"
SLAB PLAN VARIFY FLOATING
SLAB FOR LOADING/SOIL
CONDITIONS
2T-0"
28'-011
8"
Rfm
lJ
� � T
1'-6'
8'
VARIFY FLOATING
SLAB FOR LOADING/SOIL
CONDITIONS
PROPOSED
BOATHOUSE
Y-0"SETBACK
LINE @ HIGH
VATER MARK
'E PLAN
' n 50 o.
1"x12" R.SAWN CEDAR
FASCIA w l 1"x4" OVER
318" EXT, PLYWD
SOFFIT _
1"x8" R.SAWN CEDAR
FASCIA w./ 1 "x3" OVER
@ EYEBROW ROOF
i "X8" ROUGH SAWN
BEVEL CEDAR SIDING
w.16" EXPOSURE
12
RUBBER ROOF
TREATED 2"x6" OVER 1"x12" R.SAWN CEDAR
2"x4" DOUBLE DECK FASCIA w.l 1 "x4" OVER
TOP RAIL
318" EXT. PLYWD
TREATED 4"x4" --
SOFFIT
RAILING POSTS
- 2"X6" ROUGH SAWN
TREATED 2"x2" CEDAR CORNER BRDS.
DECK SPINDLES 8 W€NDOW TRIM
SPACING PER CODE)
TREATED 514"x6"._ 1"X8" ROUGH SAWN
DECKING
BEVEL CEDAR SIDING
w.16" EXPOSURE
TREATED DECK BEAM
1"x8" R.SAWN CEDAR
FASCIAw./ 1"x3" OVER
@ EYEBROW ROOF
CULTURED
STONE
VENEER
--
RIGHT ELEVATION
TREATED 6"x6"
DECK POSTS
LAKE SIDE
SOUTH
I •` 1
12 RUBBER ROOF TREATED DECK STAIRS
(GRADE TO DETERMINE
EXACT # OF RISERS)
PROVIDE OPNG
FOR FUTURE
A/C UNIT
2"X6" ROUGH SAWN
CEDAR CORNER 6ROS
& WINDOW TRIM
TREATED 514"xW
DECKING
CULTURED
- STONE
VENEER
TREATED 2"x6" OVER
2"x4" DOUBLE DECK
TOP RAIL
TREATED 4"x4"
RAILING POSTS
TREATED 2"x2"
DECK SPINDLES
SPACING PER CODE)
TREATED DECK BEAM
LEFT ELEVATION
BAY SIDE
NORTH
TREATED 6"x6"
DECK POSTS
�o NT Y of IRAC NE N
he above —described property has been surveyed under my direction and
,)e above reap is a correct representation thereof.
NTED_AT: NORTH CAPE, THIS 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2005.
.10
(4ERICANRVffI N—C COMPANY, INC.
'ETE L. BAILEY, RLS NO. 1398
:ECERTIFED this ------
day of -----
LEGEND:
0 — DENOTES NO. 6 REBAR W/CAP SET
2005.
ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO GRID NORTH,
SOUTH ZONE OF THE WISCONSIN STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. �*A
• — DENOTES IRON PIPE FOUND
PARCEL N0.2
(25,919 SF, 0.595 AC.)
RE LANE
OF WAY WIDTH VARIES)
+W"
�j
v`/ N 60'39'00"E 59.85
(RECORDED AS N 674'E)
7ggTI R1133 7ft
yyAML X
N 45'43'00"E 41.30'
(RECORDED AS N 47-S'E)
N (RECORDED OO
AS N 61*115'E�4`
m 70'S7100"E 65 90'
XTOO
asNs�195
(RECORDED AS N 7722'E) �}h*vim
93.84
N 36'44'00"E 42.75' 77
(RECORDED AS N 38'9'E) XTOS /
793.84
XTOS /
OH► M FLAGX
791.67
N 33'28'00"W 67.27'--J
(RECORDED AS N 373'W)
XTOB J,
.71 N • o� �'
TOB
.
3.62 ' C? GU� E1 s7E%�ft r
TOO /
u? /
WE4.31
xWE(01
793,
XTOB
794.24 X93.85
TO
,Vo XTOBCU
et
/ 794-28
XTOB
723.66
10
S 39'21'53"W 65.71'
(RECORDED AS S 47.03'W 58.34)
/793.86
XTOB
S 28'58 00"W 122.05
(RECORDED AS S 30'23'W)
V�
DENOTES: 20' SETBACK LINE FROM THE O
ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK,
S 46'03'00"W 41.45'
(RECORDED AS 5 47'28'W)
S 6T 13'00"W 61.16'
(RECORDED S 68'38'W 01.20.)
shore of the afor
beginning of the
Westerly and Nort
North 32 3' West,
thence North 62 4
feet; thence Ncrt
41.30 feet; thenc
courses; South 3t
41.45 feet; then
West, 72.32 feet
Also, including
the Lake; and al,
the public highm
D7irx' +.T. TTT
That part of the
Township Five (5
Waukesha County,
Beginning at a p
South 7� East,
from the 161h POE
thence running S
North 5� East on
feet; thence Nor
Excepting that F
1994 on Reel 20C