ZBA-Minutes 07-1991April 3, 1991
Mr. Jeffrey E. Snelson
S70 W13390 Fennimore Lane
Muskego, WI 53150
Dear Mr. Snelson:
Re: S79 W17422 Scenic Drive
Muskego, WI
The Board of Appeals wishes to advise you that your request for
a 2' offset variance has been granted with the condition that
some provision be made to prevent water from entering the
hoK&k adjacent west property.
I- I
Sincerely,
BOARD OF APPEALS
Cheryl Schmidt
Recording Secretary
cds
CITY OF MUSKEGO
BOARD OF APPEALS
MINUTES OF BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD ON MARCH 28, 1991.
Vice -Chairman Terry O'Neil called the meeting to order at
7:30 P.M.
PRESENT: - Vice -Chairman Terry O'Neil, Thomas Berken, Bonnie
Posbrig, Donald Pionek, Daryl Rowinski and Director Gerald P. Lee.
ABSENT: - Chairman Gerald Fohr.
MINUTES:
Mr. Pionek made a motion to approve the minutes of the February
28, 1991 meeting and Mr. Berken seconded. Upon a voice vote, the
motion to approve the minutes passed unanimously.
APPEAL 4-91 - ROGER FRYCIENSKI, W186 56834 Jewel Crest
Vice -Chairman O'Neil read the appeal for Mr. Frycienski requesting
a 413" separation variance between a proposed residential addition
and an existing detached garage structure. Mr. Lee stated they
wish to construct an addition to the existing dwelling. The
zoning is RS-3/OLS. Mr. Frycienski appeared before the Board of
Appeals. He said his hardship is the 800 sq. ft. size of his
house with no basement; he has explored other options but his lot
is so small. Mr. Pionek discussed the required sideyards and what
will go in the space between the garage and the house. Mr. Lee
will check the plans when they come into the Building Department
for a permit. Vice- Chairman O'Neil asked if anyone in the
audience wished to speak? No one did. Vice -Chairman O'Neil
informed Mr. Frycienski the Board of Appeals will try to reach a
decision on this variance tonht and he could call the Building
Inspection Office in the morning to obtain the Board's decision or
wait for it to be mailed to him within five (5) days.
APPEAL 5-91 - DONALD B. CHAPMAN, W188 57628 Oak Grove
Vice -Chairman O'Neil read the appeal for Mr. Chapman requesting a
6' offset variance to allow an existing storage structure. Mr.
Lee stated an appeal concerning the garage was requested in the
summer of 1989. The zoning is RS-3/OLS. This shed was
constructed 1' into the lake access area. Vice -Chairman O'Neil
asked who the owner of this lake access is? Mr. Lee responded the
City of Muskego. Mr. Chapman appeared before the Board and stated
he bought his house of March 1979, but didn't know of the 13'
Right of Way; there was no existing survey of his land. He did
present a survey of another property dated 7/17/74 and sketched
his structures on this dwelling. He replaced an existing metal
structure and didn't get a permit; he just replaced the building
with another. Since then, he has taken out a permit. His
hardship is: 1-he can't put the structure in front because of the
power line; 2- he can't move it down to the lake area; 3- he would
loose most of the structure in disassembly. He maintains the
lot. He discussed this with Pete Theis of the Park and Rec
Pg. 2
Department. Vice -Chairman O'Neil asked Mr. Lee if the city has
checked this encroachment to see who owns the land. Mr. Lee
responded he hadn't. There was some discussion concerning the
placement of this shed in relation to the house. Mr. Chapman said
he would store a lawn tractor in this shed. He said the structure
has a plywood floor on cement blocks dug into the ground -- not
cement. Mr. Pionek questioned Mr. Chapman as to whether on his
deed he is on Lot 10? He said he was. Mr. Berken said that
perhaps the Board of Appeals doesn't have the power to grant this
variance. The City Attorney may have to be consulted. He still
has to obain a variance for the other 5'. The existing shed is a
concern as it encroaches onto another deeded parcel. Mr. Pionek
suggested to Mr. Chapman that he get a survey done of his
property. Vice -Chairman O'Neil asked if anyone in the audience
wished to speak? Mr. Clarence Steffens, W188 S7618 Oak Grove, who
lives right to the north of him has no problem. Mr. Ed Lyon, W188
57598 Oak Grove Drive said his house is approximately 141' away.
He is concerned about this encroachment. This Right of Way has to
be left open for off -lake properties. Mr. Bill Heath, W188 S7603
Oak Grove lives two houses down and is a new property owner in
this area. He is concerned with the lake access. Mr. Rowinski
was concerned with the city's liability. Mr. Lee said any claim
that was made to the city would be turned over to the city's
insurance company. Mr. Lee said any resident could speak before
the Park and Recreation Board concerning this encroachment. Mr.
Chapman in his closing said he would get a survey and go on from
there. His hardship is also financial. The Board informed Mr.
Chapman they will try to reach a decision on this matter tonight
and he can call the Building Inspection Office in the morning to
obtain the Board's decision or wait for it to be mailed to him
within five (5) days.
APPEAL 6-91 - CALVIN C. LONG - 5110 W20606 Denoon Road - Vice
Chairman O'Neil read the request for a 4' offset variance to
construct a garage. Mr. Calvin Long appeared before the Board.
He said he wished to construct the garage in the same location
before it burned down. The doors face the west and side
entrance --you need a certain radius to turn into the garage. The
sketch he submitted in lieu of a survey has a tree line that is
deceiving -- the tree line is the lot line. There is a retaining
wall there. Mr. Pionek asked where his survey was? He said he
had one in 1979 and when he refinanced, it was lost. He just has
a deed left. When asked about the unusual shape, he said he likes
the "L" shape for a shop area. He has no basement and needs
storage in his garage. He will take out the old garage slab.
Vice -Chairman O'Neil asked if anyone in the audience wished to
speak? Rick Clement, a neighbor said he supports him and would
like to also apply for a variance in the future. Vice -Chairman
O'Neil informed Mr. Long the Board will try to reach a decision on
this variance tonight. He can call the Building Inspection Office
in the morning for the decision or wait for it to be mailed to him
within five (5) days.
Pg. 3
APPEAL 7-91 - JEFFREY E. SNELSON - S79 W17422 Scenic Drive.
Vice -Chairman O'Neil read the request for a 3' offset variance on
the west lot line for the placement of a paved drive. Mr. Lee
said this request should be for a 2' offset variance. The
variance would enable the drive along the lot line to provide for
a "Turn In" to the garage. The current owner, Theresa Markowski
was also present. Mr. Snelson wishes to purchase the property
from Mr. & Mrs. Markowski. Mr. Gene Baietto, S79 W17430 Scenic
Drive, the neighbor affected by the driveway was also present.
Mr. Snelson presented his hardship and referred to his letter
dated March 12, 1991 requesting this variance which was signed by
the Snelson, Markowski, Baietto families. They were all in favor
of this variance request. Mr. Snelson also showed pictures. The
driveway has a slight pitch. There was some discussion concerning
the water run-off. Mr. Snelson feels the proposed curb would be a
positive solution. Mr. Baietto supports the curb idea.
Vice -Chairman O'Neil informed Mr. Snelson the Board will try to
reach a decision tonight and he could call the Building Inspection
Office in the morning Inspection for the decision or wait for the
decision to be mailed to him within five (5) days.
Vice -Chairman O'Neil noted the Minutes of the February 28, 1991
meeting needed to be approved. Mr. Pionek made a motion to
approved the minutes and Mr. Berken seconded. Upon a voice vote
the motion to approve the minutes passed unanimously.
The Board remained in Open Session (8:55 P.M.)
APPEAL 4-91 - ROGER FRYCIENSKI - Following a discussion
of all the information presented, Mr. Rowinski made a motion to
grant the variance as requested and Mr. Pionek seconded. The
hardship being the limited space. Upon a roll call vote the
motion to grant the variance passed unanimously.
APPEAL 5-91 - DONALD B. CHAPMAN - Mr. Berken said he
wouldn't appove the shed and feels it can be dismantled. Maybe we
could delay the decision to get legal counsel? Mr. Rowinski
thought perhaps we could give Mr. Chapman 60 days to obtain a
survey and get a legal opinion. Mr. Berken felt the Board should
not give options. Just deny the variance and he could get his
survey and if he chooses to re -appeal he could if he has new
information that wasn't available at the previous hearing. Mr.
Lee added that the Board could ask the City Attorney if it is in
their power to grant a variance that could put an encroachment on
land; it may be that the Board of Appeals does not have the
right. Mr. Berken made a motion to deny the appeal as requested
and Mr. Rowinski seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to
deny passed unanimously.
APPEAL 6-91 - CALVIN C. LONG - Vice -Chairman O'Neil
questioned the shape of the garage. Mr. Pionek felt he should
check with the original mortgage lender to obtain a survey. After
some discussion Mr. Pionek made a motion to grant the variance as
requested the hardship being the width of the lot. Mrs. Posbrig
Pg. 4
seconded. Upon a roll call vote the motion to grant the variance
passed unanimously.
APPEAL 7-91 - JEFFREY E. SNELSON - The Board agreed to
change the variance request to a 2' offset. Mr. Pionek commented
that the neighbor, Mr. Baietto supported this variance. The curb
on the concrete fixes the potential complaint. Mr. Berken said he
had talked to the owner, Mrs. Markowski, who said her concrete
contractor had told her this driveway would not cause problems
with the city. The grade of the driveway is sloped. Mr. Pionek
wished to abstain and was allowed to do so. Mr. Berken made a
motion to approve the 2' variance request the hardship being this
is the best way to solve the water/snow problem. Mr. Rowinski
discussed the drainage issue and the side entry to the garage. Mr.
Berken further clarified his motion to read that a variance be
granted as amended to a 2' offset variance with the condition that
some provision be made to prevent water from entering the adjacent
west property. Mr. Rowinski seconded. Upon a roll call vote the
motion to grant the variance passed unanimously with Mr. Pionek
abstaining.
ADJOURNMENT: Mrs. Posbrig made a motion to adjourn the
meeting at 9:40 P.M. and Mr. Pionek seconded. Upon a voice vote,
the motion to adjourn passed unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
V
Cheryl Schmidt
Recording Secretary
/cds
CITY OF MUSKEGO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Wisconsin State Statute 62.23
(3) 6. that a public hearing will be held at the Muskego City
Hall, W182 58200 Racine Avenue, at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, March 28,
1991 to consider the following appeals:
Appeal 4-91 ROGER FRYCIENSKI
W186 56834 Jewel Crest
Muskego, WI 53150
Requesting a 4'3" separation variance between
a proposed residential addition and an existing
detached garage structure.
ZONING: RS-3/OLS
Appeal 5-91 DONALD B. CHAPMAN
W188 S7628 Oak Grove
Muskego, WI 53150
Requesting a 6' offset variance to allow an
existing storage structure.
ZONING: RS-3/OLS
Appeal 6-91 CALVIN C. LONG
S110 W20606 Denoon Road
Muskego, WI 53150
Requesting a 4' offset variance to construct a
garage.
ZONING: RS-2/OLS
Appeal 7-91 JEFFREY E. SNELSON
S79 W17422 Scenic Drive
Muskego, WI 53150
Requesting a 3' offset variance on the west lot
line for the placement of a paved drive.
ZONING: RS-2/OPD
NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Appeals of the City of
Muskego will convene, upon passage of the proper motion, into
closed session pursuant to Section 19.85 (1) (a) of the State
Statutes for the purpose of deliberating concerning cases which
were the subject of a quasi-judicial hearing; said cases being the
above listed appeals.
The Board of Appeals will then reconvene into open session.
Detailed descriptions are available for public inspection at the
Clerk's office. All interested parties will be given an
opportunity to be heard.
Board of Appeals
City of Muskego
Gerald Fohr, Chairman
Dated this 15th day of
March, 1991
CITY OF MUSKEGO
BOARD OF APPEALS
/ 1 47/
` DATE
y NAME JFF efy SAJ
r ADDRESS � 3390 Nti,/-,yokiF Lti
TELEPHONE SZq-41
PROPERTY LOCATION ON WHICH VARIANCE IS REQUESTED
ADDRESS S-76? :-_ 17z ScE-pilc_
SUBDIVISION Me w G,e -v-^j (SST LOT (Z BLOCK
TYPE OF ZONING S Z -- Opc)
VARIANCE REQUESTED:
REASON FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: D/cJj7,2—/ Ct�' �,e UHF %awft2DS
� izi� iC D"F, 9L
$35.00 -" FEE TO BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION:
DATE PAID RECEIPT NO.
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
CHAIR.
VICE-+
MEMBEI
MEMBEF
MEMBEF
F I RST
SECOND
Secrecary
Da Z e ,�(�