Loading...
Zoning Board of Appeals- - Minutes 05/03/2001MUSKEGO DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING Brian D. Turk Director of Planning (262) 679-4136 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDINGS OF FACTS A dimensional variance is hereby granted to Kenneth and Elizabeth Behrendt, by the Zoning Board of appeals of the City of Muskego to permit a setback of 4.11 feet from the right-of-way line and a 2.5% open space variance for the construction of an attached garage at W186 S7701 Lincoln Drive, based upon the applicant having met the specifics of the City Ordinance with respect to granting variances. It was found that the variances preserve the intent of the Municipal Code because there is practical difficulty associated with the existing location of the residence on a legal non -conforming parcel, there were exceptional conditions applying that do not generally apply to other properties. More specifically, the granting of the variance provides the Behrendt property with rights enjoyed by properties in the immediate vicinity, the property rights of other property owners are preserved, and no substantial detriment is caused to an adjacent property. Dated this I& day of May, 2001. Signed c,<: >�<` ,`• Terry O'Neill Acting Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals �v Signed Dustin I #olff AssistaryVPlan Di W182 S8200 Racine Avenue • Box 749 • Muskego, Wisconsin 53150-0749 • Fax (262) 679-5614 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES MAY 3, 2001 Meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: Acting Chairman Terry O'Neil, David Conley, Mike Brandt, and Horst Schmidt. ABSENT: Dan Schepp, Barbara Blumenfield and Henry Schneiker. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE: Meeting was originally noticed April 16, 2001 and amended April 24, 2001. NEW BUSINESS: APPEAL #02-2001 Petitioner: Kenneth and Elizabeth Behrendt, Residence: W186 S7701 Lincoln Drive / Tax Key No. 2195.113 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 17:3.08(1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following variances: Chapter 17— Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 Building Location. Location Restricted: No building shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except in conformity with the following locational regulations as hereinafter specified for the district in which it is located. A setback of 25 feet is required from the edge of the public right-of-way. The petitioner seeks a setback of 4.11 feet to permit the construction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 20.89-foot variance. Minimum open space for the property is required in the amount of 6,716 square feet (75% of the lot area). The proposal will reduce the open space required by 230 square feet (resulting in 72.5% of the lot area preserved as open space) to permit the construction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 2.5% variance. Zoned: RS-3/OLS, Suburban Residence District as modified by the Lakeshore Overlay Mr. Brandt administered an oath to Kenneth Behrendt, Mr. Behrendt stated their desire to replace the existing detached garage with a three stall attached garage and an addition of a first floor mudroom and laundry room. He stated that the lot is small and the existing detached garage is located on the edge of the lot. In addition, he stated that many of the neighbors have garages located near the edge of their properties. Mr. Behrendt also indicated that there is no other practical location on the property to building a garage. Assistant Plan Director Dustin Wolff stated this is a small lot that was originally intended for seasonal housing with small homes and one -car detached garages. As is the case with many properties around Little Muskego Lake, these homes are occupied year-round. As such, typically any alteration or improvement a homeowner proposes to make the home more functional cannot be accommodated without the need for an exception to a Code requirement. The existing detached garage is located 3 feet from the property line making it legal non -conforming. The proposed addition would be 22 feet from the pavement, so this would not result in a safety issue. The abutting properties have similar situations where the detached garages are located less than two feet from the right-of-way. Staff agrees with the petitioner stating pre-existing condition of the lot, the location of the residence and garage, and the, topography of the property result in a practical difficulty in complying with the Code. DELIBERATION: Mike Brandt made a motion to approve Appeal #02-2001 as submitted. Mr. Schmidt seconded. Upon roll call vote, Appeal #02-2001 was approved unanimously. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 22, 2001 MEETING: Mike Brandt made a motion to defer February minutes to the June meeting due to lack of members here that attended that meeting. Dave Conley seconded. Upon voice vote, motion carried. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS. DISCUSSION AND DECISION REGARDING USE OF THE ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM. Dave Conley made a motion to defer this item until more members were in attendance. Mike Brandt seconded, upon voice vote, motion carried unanimously. ZBA 5/3/2001 Page 2 ORDER OF AUTHORITY: Horst Schmidt made a motion that in the absence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman, the most senior member shall chair the meeting and the second most senior member shall be the Vice chairman. Mike Brandt seconded, upon roll call vote, motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: At 7:35 P.M. Mr. Brandt made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Conley seconded. With no further business to come before this board, meeting was adjourned on voice vote. Respectfully submitted, Susan J. Schroeder Recording Secretary ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA *AMENDED MEETING DATE CITY OF MUSKEGO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Wisconsin State Statute 62.23 (7) (e) 6, that a Public Hearing will be held in the Alderman's Room at the Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, at 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, Affil , *Thursday, May 3, 2001, to consider the following petitions for appeals to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Muskego: 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE 4. OLD BUSINESS None S. NEW BUSINESS APPEAL #02-2001 Petitioner: Kenneth and Elizabeth Behrendt Residence: W186 S7701 Lincoln Drive / Tax Key No. 2195.113 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 17:3.08(1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following variances: Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 Building Location Location Restricted: No building shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except in conformity with the following locational regulations as hereinafter specified for the district in which it is located. A setback of 25 feet is required from the edge of the public right-of-way. The petitioner seeks a setback of 4.11 feet to permit the construction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 20.89-foot variance. Minimum open space for the property is required in the amount of 6,716 square feet (75% of the lot area). The proposal will reduce the open space required by 230 square feet (resulting in 72.5% of the lot area preserved as open space) to permit the construction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 2.5% variance. Zoned: RS-3/OLS, Suburban Residence District as modified by the Lakeshore Overlay DISCUSSION AND DECISION REGARDING USE OF THE ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM 6. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 22, 2001 MEETING. 7. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS. City of Muskego Zoning Board of Appeals Supplement 02-2001 For the meeting of. May 3, 2001 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 17:3.08(1) Appeal Provisions, Petitioner seeks the following variances: Chapter 17—Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 Building Location Location Restricted: No building shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except in conformity with the following locational regulations as hereinafter specified for the district in which it is located. A setback of 25 feet is required from the edge of the public right-of-way. The petitioner seeks a setback of 4.11 feet to permit the construction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 20.89-foot variance. Minimum open space for the property is required in the amount of 6,716 square feet (75% of the lot area). The proposal will reduce the open space required by 230 square feet (resulting in 72.5% of the lot area preserved as open space) to permit the construction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 2.5% variance. Zoned: RS-3/OLS, Suburban Residence District as modified by the Lakeshore Overlay. LOCATION: W186 S7701 Lincoln Drive (Tax Key No. 2195.113) SW 1/4 Section 9 PETITIONER: Kenneth and Elizabeth Behrendt PREPARED BY: Dustin Wolff BACKGROUND The property currently contains a legal, non -conforming detached single car garage located 3.3' from the right-of-way line. The primary structure is legal and conforming as it currently meets the required 6' and 8.9' offsets required by Code. The lot itself is legal non -conforming as it has a 60-foot average width and approximately 8,955 square feet. This allows for 2,239 SF of impervious surface. Currently, the property meets the open space requirement. However, the proposed addition would require an open space variance of 2.5% (230 SF). DISCUSSION The two -car, attached garage will replace the single -car, detached garage. The petitioner is limited by the pre-existing condition of the lot, as the properties around the lake were originally platted very narrow and small in area, as their use was seasonal in nature. The site is further hindered by the placement of the residence on the lot which does not allow for additions or alterations to the residence without encroaching a required setback. Furthermore, the property currently has the pre- existing condition of a legal, non -conforming detached garage. ZBA 4-24-2001 Page 2 It is practical to expect that a residence should have a two -car garage available, especially lake properties. A number of properties in the immediate vicinity to this parcel have similar situations, wherein additions to the residence or the construction of detached garages have reduced the proximity to the public right-of-way. The petitioner will still have approximately 20 feet from the front of the proposed garage to the egde of the roadway. In staff's opinion, no safety concern exists. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of Appeal 02-2001 permitting a 4.11 foot setback from the public right-of-way and a 2.50/o(230 SF) variance for the purposed of open space. �T "-4-4 72V - 111f. ,4 i prH ' �D Gib /.v4PAr&.Y,1• w J rN --W4 c E' Ex /.r r ,6*'-y • / / f� d.y7'$y"4,0i" '. rS 9� yAc-.•rq,,p .ate TP'o r` : /t/YJj 1,4�yE j'/yJf ��.�.v -• /70 xp CITY OF MUSKEGO BOARD OF APPEALS Application for Variance Applicant's Name nJ,c_711 4- >nF LA_1, o 7- Subject Property Address b IC6 5; 7 7y/ &,,� �c_ez_,,1 ,?• Telephoned26,Z- 97I- e3a3 Property Zoning: Fs J 01- S, Tax Key # of I , It 3 Petitioner's relationship to property (circle applicable): owner lessee other Fee: $200.00 Date inspector denied zoning permit: Requesting variance to Code Section To allow: 0,cdedat= (7,90 / CAU _ i m TS�c ram. LINri- . A literal enforcement of the terms of the above -referenced section would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship because: iT es i*%,.Ocas3,,aLdj.. 7-a CT! T ✓ i I/ ' prL j e i The variance, if granted, will not be contrary to the public interest and will be in accord with the spirit of the code because: ia� hzoArcc,� ,�tJ�7,T.on� .•j& w /r ,2ox �,,,,i - r ; Aw z_ g d T.-eArl) v .1 .41 - L VJ z- s' /,A"k S, ►�S ir,� G ri�S i3 Y ►.. rry �� ; i,v r n/+GJ4o T. S�or� vb' c r-r;-S' U� � +ram The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect public safety or jeopardize public welfare because: rv-i— /,�7>ni i.-?j l ("— v--L i&.4- 3--+L-d7J116 _ J S o Girl' o (Y l�l lid Printed version of written text on the enclosed application for variance: To allow: an addition of approximately 934 sq, ft, including an attached garage (790 sq. ft), and a new first floor entrance with laundry room (144 sq. ft). The proposed attached three -stall garage is designed for two cars and a boat with trailer. The proposed garage replaces the existing single car detached garage that is an existing, non -conforming structure located approximately 3 ft from the base setback line. A literal enforcement of the terms of the above -referenced section would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship because: it is impossible to build a garage anywhere on the property without violating either front, side, or base setback restrictions. The small lot size also makes it difficult to stay within the open -space zoning restrictions. The variance, if granted, will not be contrary to the public interest and will be in accord with the spirit of the code because: the proposed addition will be approximately one foot farther from the existing base setback line than the existing detached garage, and will be no closer to the base setback line than several other garages on Lincoln Dr., and on other area streets with the same zoning. The storage area provided by the new garage will improve the neighborhood aesthetics by eliminating the need to store vehicles, boats, or boat trailers outside The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect public safety or jeopardize welfare because: the proposed addition will meet all existing building codes, and provide sufficient space to park vehicles, boat, and boat trailer indoors, out of sight, and off of existing right-of-way. 1 It N 0 ell `1 bi r� x I 1� a U v o n O *1 w an a — C y .r T T M •--I �.. .--• O� •� U •r- a O r •--� z� wv u urn vs va) .0 c L n c wLncp• - a) to -Io S z yr V) w +ern - z yr c cr cv i a o •oiaT o c�0 r c L it •w.- r c o +� •r N 00 ro L ro. - w N U O ro N V c 4- CT C 7 a 4Ch - 43 a- z o D�-+CY oV�DOCn ; W c U p N C r-I fX +� O In cn >, OD N a "o • a y- r r p J t L.0 w ro+�3N CH �+5 O•t7 C m n u = O c a a w0-0 -1 3 V Ca r- wcn >,cmv - �+' a C" i i-+ W I- N - '0 v s` ac ro a Ca U') c z •\ N L C O CD ro to •" O +--I O p V) L •--i L- z U� a ONr,: O J, u • Cam: 4- W ro Z O Z wN O o .c o ro Q .o :X LL) a 3 M, a � Cn Q3 to • u - Clt > ••. a ac - Ln to C CV L- C :3 Z a 0 a O - r-r 4 A O me rJ J- O r- u LU 0 N- ro i) r-I all co 4- V1 ct N C 4- n O O - LD ro O N �n o x cn c• w z o M• a •r - r` U N p\ aY CTC [_)� to LLJ CO tG C t!1 ]C W O E N 4) IV CT 7 =VI 4-3 I O 4-J •• Or ••., i � L C� - - r- cx - p ro M ro L C� z C CL O 3 •• p to T D -- Lfl a s Z 4J4-.O ••Nr�O U.0 J V)� C 4-'e7Na4 C .J�o av to i n n H t L V1� Q wOr- 1 IOLn w t^ �o + M -r ca4-) n Ln V) V) ++ Ln rn �-. (D ro • C xvlLL) S v, a Cr p ., •r 3t u w O c C Caw r, ]L -* O 't:l O C - 4- er ro 1~ V) n \ CV .O a ►- a CV O V7 M .--I = Z1 r- J= Q M w Cu CA L O N 0 a Lfn co a %0 CT 4) O 4- n S M ftt OD F- 3 C L V tD L .0 r+ C? • ou a yr C • • CV D CD -j2-' M to L +o roZ UW lO iJ w N -J C t� iL lL tL lL IL r Vj N V� k ci Ik O ac \R y w\ ZY �m w v 41 W ( ] J;; 7 WIC• crZoz� 0 wWWe Q J> �c 6 10C, W Wcc • �e • z a i C ro U to 4- � Ti N Vl r iJ a 1A Or a c vt d. O a a �T D c > c ro +� a a •r E � � a Ln � ..J C 3 -0 Ln i7 V1 C T 4- 4 b ro O O S ro D b L L - L a 4-; L 1C +� A a +J O u 0 a a o c a > i+- ro 4Jr OD a c +' L t a Vr 4) +J .i,* a 4J C a ui H a N a aJ +? L a +J a {� >, a a 4- 4- C Lai Cl Io w w V L L Cl O fu a L W • 4) T S O ' • "� L w T V L a ✓i in a a y� x x u so a C V CG a x m In w v> 4 a +) a r 4-) L V7 a L 4 O N 4r. > a s T 4 a 4- "' a.0o�to and C >, S ro L W a s 4- L L ro a a .r aJ L iJ L }� O O uU 4: cam' L. C > 1 3 A E > E 4-a a>1 41 O a u LOO vi w O �c +j a C L�r d4 41 L w O L 3 a go V1 U r on A r y— a p C) T C Ln M: 3 ¢r ;J. a d 7a•, A t> d L d y h