Loading...
Zoning Board of Appeals 01-2007ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDINGS OF FACTS A dimensional variance is hereby granted to John Skalla, by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Muskego in Appeal #01-2007 to permit the construction of a second story addition to an existing detached garage allowing a 20-foot high accessory structure requiring a 5-foot variance and a "50% Rule" variance of S10,120 at W182 S6521 Garnet Drive / Tax Key No. 2174.185, based upon the applicant having met the specifics of the City Ordinance with respect to granting variances. It was found that the variance preserves the intent of the Municipal Code because there were exceptional conditions applying that do not generally apply to other properties. The granting of the variance will allow the property owner to add a second story addition to an existing detached garage to allow additional area for storage and a safe place for his children to play. The hardship of floodplain and floodway restricting new building footprints eliminates other alternatives. Dated this 30th day of pril 2007. Signed T ' Chairman Dan Schop Zoning Board of Appeals i Signed L Kellie Renk Recording Secretary ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES Unapproved CITY OF MUSKEGO April 26, 2007 Meeting was called to order at 7:10 P.M. Those in attendance recited the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Chairman Dan Schepp, Vice Chairman Henry Schneiker, Dr. Russ Kashian, Mr. Richard Ristow and Planner Adam Trzebiatowski. ABSENT: Dr. Barb Blumenfield, Mr. Horst Schmidt, Mr. William Le Doux STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE: The secretary stated the meeting was noticed on April 19, 2007 in accordance with open meeting laws. NEW BUSINESS: Appeal #01-2007 — Petitioner: John Skalla, W182 S6521 Garnet Drive / Tax Key No. 2174.185. REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.02 Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioner seeks the following variances: Two variances are being requested within this appeal. A. Chapter 17 — Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 — Building Height. (1) Maximum Height Restricted: In any district no building or structure shall be hereafter erected or structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations for that district, except as may be modified by this Code. A maximum height of 15-feet is allowed for accessory structures as measured from the average grade at the front of the building to the mid point of the highest gable. The petitioner seeks a height, as measured by code, of 20-feet for a 2"" story addition to their existing detached garage, and is therefore requesting a 5-foot variance to the accessory structure height requirement. B. Chapter 17 — Zoning Ordinance: Section 6.02 — Non -Conformity. (2)C. Structure repairs and alterations to non -conforming structure housing shall not, as long as such use continues, exceed 50% of the assessed value of the structure at the time the use became nonconforming. The material costs for additions to non -conforming structures are limited to 50% of the assessed fair market value (FMV). The existing garage on the property has a FMV of $8,000, which allows $4,000 (50% of $8,000) to be put into materials for an addition. The petitioner seeks a garage addition with materials valued at $14,120, and is therefore requesting a $10,120 variance. Vice Chairman Schneiker swore in John Skalla and Adam Trzebiatowski. Mr. Skalla explained he would like to add a second story addition above the garage. The property is located in the floodway and because of the floodway the DNR will not allow the footprint of the building to be expanded. The property does not have a basement due to the floodway also. Mr. Skalla stated he does not have adequate storage or a safe place for his children to play. Mr. Skalla stated the garage will still be lower in height then the house and the neighbors have no issues with the addition. Mr. Skalla stated his hardship is having a legal non -conforming lot in a floodway that will not allow him to expand the footprint of the building. Mr. Skalla stated he needs an area for storage and a safe place for his children to play. ZBA Minutes 4/26/2007 Page 2 Mr. Trzebiatowski gave the City's opinion based on the Zoning Code. The petitioner is seeking approvals to construct a second story addition to an existing non -conforming detached garage. The petitioner currently has a 2-story home with a detached garage on their property. The entire property is shown within the 100-year floodplain. A small portion of the parcel near the road is within the floodfringe. Most of the parcel is within the floodway. Their house does not have a basement for storage or play due to the floodplain location and the water table. The petitioners first option was to add onto the existing house and/or to connect the house to the garage. The DNR typically does not allow any new structures/additions that could raise the regional flood elevation by more than .01-foot. Therefore, Mr. Skalla is requesting two variances the first one for an exception to the accessory structure height requirement for a second story garage addition. The maximum height of 15-feet is allowed for accessory structures as measured from the average grade at the front of the building to the mid point of the highest gable. The petitioner seeks a height of 20-feet for a 2nd story addition to the existing detached garage, which a 5-foot variance to the accessory structure height requirement. The second is an exception to the 50% rule for a non -conforming accessory structure. The material costs for additions to non -conforming structures are limited to 50% of the assessed fair market value. The existing garage on the property has a fair market value of $8,000, which allows $4,000 to be put into materials. The petitioner seeks a garage addition valued at $14,120 and is requesting a $10,120 variance. Based upon the submitted information staff has found a valid hardship. The petitioner has researched all other possible options and the second story addition above the garage is the only one that could work. Staff respectfully requests approval allowing a 20-foot high accessory structure for the construction of a second story addition to an existing detached garage, requiring a 5-foot variance and a 50% rule variance of $10,120, citing the variances preserve the intent of the Zoning Ordinance because there are exceptional conditions applying to the parcel that do not apply to other properties. The floodplain and floodway on this property restricts new building footprints from being constructed, which eliminates other alternatives. Appeal #02-2007 — Petitioner: Curtis J. Callies, S76 W18384 Kingston Drive / Tax Key No. 2195.005. REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.02 Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioner seeks the following variances: Chapter 17 — Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 — Building Location. (1) Location Restricted: No building shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except in conformity with the following locational regulations as hereinafter specified for the district in which it is located. In the case of the petitioned lot, an offset of 8.5-feet is required from the side (western) lot line for any structure or deck. The petitioner seeks an offset of 5.7-feet from the side (western) lot line to permit the construction of a deck/stairs, and is therefore requesting a 2.8-foot variance from the side (western) lot line. Vice Chairman Schneiker swore in C.J. Callies and Adam Trzebiatowski. Mr. Callies explained he built his home in 2004. Drawings for deck permits were submitted at the same time as the new home for approval. The permit expired for the deck before it was completed. The City sent Mr. Callies a letter to renew and that is when it was discovered the deck was non -conforming. Mr. Callies stated he has a 9-foot basement and his house is higher than both his neighbors. He had planned on doing some type of stairs on this side but after discussing this with his neighbor they decided it is too steep to do anything. The west side will be the only access point to the front of the house. On the west side of the house is the proposed wood stairs that are not completed. Originally the stairs were going to be made of concrete or a retaining wall. Mr. Callies stated his hardship is safety. The concrete/retaining wall stairs would not be safe for ZBA Minutes 4/26/2007 Page 3 people to walk down. This wood stairs with a handrail would be much safer. Mr. Trzebiatowski gave the City's opinion based on the Zoning Code. The petitioner has already constructed a deck/stairs along the side of their house leading from the front yard to the side/rear of their house without proper permits being issued and does not meet the zoning requirements. 8.5-feet is required from the side (western) lot line, which is already reduced because the lot is narrow. The petitioner is seeking an offset of 5.7-feet from the side/western lot line and is therefore requesting a 2.8-foot variance. Based upon the submitted information staff has not been able to find a valid hardship that meets State Law and Zoning Code Law guidelines. When the new home permit for the house was approved, the plans showed that the side of the house in question was going to have a retaining wall staircase, which is allowed by code. It also showed a concrete pad/landing at the side of the garage where the side service door to the garage is located. If the original plans would have been followed, there would not be any zoning issues today. The majority of lake lots with exposures do not have access via a staircase they use the natural grade of the land as access. The grading plan submitted showed the current height above ground due to the 9-foot basement and the desire to have a full exposure. The Engineering regulations at the time required the rear yard grade elevation to be 3-feet above the 100-year floodplain elevation. This then forced the house to be at a higher grade if a full exposure was wanted by the owner. A full exposure was not required by the City. Mr. Trzebiatowski added one of the biggest principals relating to the variance request is the fact that the deck/stairs were almost completely finished before the variance request was submitted. Construction without a permit is not a hardship and not following the previously approved plans is not a hardship. Staff is respectfully requesting denial of appeal 02-2007, citing the variance does not preserve the intent of the Zoning Ordinance because there are not exceptional conditions applying to the parcel that do no apply to other properties. Also, a non -self imposed hardship is not found for the appeal. The placement of the house and its doors, the placement of the existing retaining walls, and the proposed grading of the site are self-imposed hardships. Dr. Kashian stated the only issue is the wrong materials were used and without the proper permits. Mr. Schneiker questioned the difference between wood or block stairs related to the stricter setbacks/offsets. Mr. Trzebiatowski stated the deck is considered a built structure connected to the house and tends to be more obtrusive. The retaining wall or blocks are built into the ground and are not as noticeable. Mr. Callies submitted a letter that the neighbor signed stating they would not be installing any kind of steps, stairs, paths or retaining walls on the eastern side of the property. DELIBERATIONS: Appeal #01-2007 — Vice Chairman Schneiker moved to approve as submitted. Seconded by Dr. Kashian. The hardship of having floodway and floodfringe over the entire parcel and the DNR restrictions of what you can do in a floodway gives the property owner no other options but to build a second story addition over the garage to allow for storage and a safe place for his children to play. Upon a roll call vote Appeal 01-2007 is approved 4-0. Appeal #02-2007 — Dr. Kashian moved to approve as submitted. Seconded by Vice Chairman Schneiker. Dr. Kashian stated the argument in this appeal is over building ZBA Minutes 4/26/2007 Page 4 materials. The house needs a set of stairs and the wood deck/stairs is a quality structure. Dr. Kashian added there needs to be a staircase as the service door would lead to nowhere. There would also be undue hardship for the property owner to pour cement to create a staircase. Vice Chairman Schneiker added this structure will be inspected to ensure safety as part of the building permit inspection process. A block staircase would not be inspected. Upon a roll call vote Appeal 02-2007 is approved 5-0. OLD BUSINESS: none. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Dr. Kashian moved to approve the minutes of December 7, 2006. Seconded by Mr. Ristow. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. MISCELLANEOUS: ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before this Board, Vice Chairman Schnieker moved to adjourn. Dr. Kashian seconded. Upon voice vote, meeting adjourned at 8:03 P.M. R sp tfully Submitted, ellie Renk Recording Secretary CITY OF MUSKEGO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA April 26, 2007 7:00 PM Muskego City Hall, Muskego Room, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Appeals of the City of Muskego may convene, upon passage of the proper motion, into closed session pursuant to Section 19.85 (1) (a) of the State Statutes for the purpose of deliberating concerning cases which were the subject of a quasi-judicial hearing; said cases being the appeals described below. The Board of Appeals will then reconvene into open session. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS 1. APPEAL #01-2007 Petitioner: John Skalla Property: W 182 S6521 Garnet Drive / Tax Key No. 2174.185 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.02 Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioner seeks the following variances: NOTE: There are two variances being requested within this appeal. A. Chapter 17 - Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 - Building Height (1) MAXIMUM HEIGHT RESTRICTED In any district no building or structure shall be hereafter erected or structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations for that district, except as may be modified by this Code. A maximum height of 15-feet is allowed for accessory structures as measured from the average grade at the front of the building to the mid point of the highest gable. The petitioner seeks a height, as measured by code, of 20-feet for a 2"d story addition to their exi.qtinn riatarheri nnrnna anri ig th—f— variance to the accessory structure height requirement. B. Chapter 17 - Zoning Ordinance: Section 6.02 - Non -Conformity (2)C. Structure repairs and alterations to a non -conforming structure housing shall not, as long as such use continues, exceed 50% of the assessed value of the structure at the time the use became nonconforming. The material costs for additions to non -conforming structures are limited to 50% of the assessed fair market value (FMV). The existing garage on the property has a FMV of $8,000, which allows $4,000 (50% of $8,000) to be put into materials for an addition. The petitioner seeks a garage addition with materials valued at $14,120, and is therefore requesting a $10,120 variance. ZBA 4/26/2007 Page 2 2. APPEAL #02-2007 Petitioner: Curtis J. Callies Property: S76 W 18384 Kingston Drive / Tax Key No. 2195.005 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 Zoning Ordinance: Section 3.02 Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioner seeks the following variance: Chapter 17 - Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.02 - Building Location (1) Location Restricted: No building shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or relocated on a lot except in conformity with the following locational regulations as hereinafter specified for the district in which it is located. In the case of the petitioned lot, an offset of 8.5-feet is required from the side (western) lot line for any structure or deck. The petitioner seeks an offset of 5.7-feet from the side (western) lot line to permit the construction of a deck/stairs, and is therefore requesting a 2.8-foot variance from the side (western) lot line. CLOSED SESSION OPEN SESSION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE DECEMBER 7, 2006 MEETING. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS None. ADJOURN It is possible that members of and possibly a quorum of members of other governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above -stated meeting to gather information; no action will be taken by any governmental body at the above -stated meeting other than the governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice. Also, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Janice Moyer, City Clerk/Treasurer at Muskego City Hall, (262) 679-5625. City of Muskego Staff Representative Brief Zoning Board of Appeals Supplement 01-2007 For the meeting of. April 26, 2007 REQUESTING: Under the direction of Chapter 17 - Zoning Ordinance: Section 5.03 - Building Height (1) MAXIMUM HEIGHT RESTRICTED In any district no building or structure shall be hereafter erected or structurally altered to a height in excess of that hereinafter specified by the regulations for that district, except as may be modified by this Code. And Under the direction of Chapter 17 - Zoning Ordinance: Section 6.02 - Non -Conformity (2)C. Structure repairs and alterations to a non -conforming structure housing shall not, as long as such use continues, exceed 50% of the assessed value of the structure at the time the use became nonconforming. APPELLANT: John Skalla LOCATION: W 182 S6521 Garnet Drive / Tax Key No. 2174.185 CITY'S POSITION PRESENTED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, City Staff Representative BACKGROUND The petitioner is seeking approvals to construct a second story addition to an existing non -conforming detached garage on the above mentioned property. The petitioner currently has a 2-story home with a detached garage on their property. The entire property is shown within the 100-year floodplain. A small portion of the parcel near the road is within the floodfringe. Most of the parcel is within the floodway, which has much greater restrictions than the floodfringe. The petitioner has stated that they need additional storage and a safe place for their children to play. Their house does not have a basement for storage or play due to the floodplain location and the water table. Since they are located within a floodway, the DNR and the City of Muskego Floodplain Ordinance do not typically allow any new structures/additions (that contain a footprint) that could raise the regional flood elevation by more than .01- foot and/or that could block or obstruct flood flow waters. The petitioner's first option was going to be to add onto the existing house and/or to connect the house and garage together. This would have then not required any variances. That option was not possible though due to the floodway regulations. Attached is a map showing the most recent draft floodplain maps from the DNR and FEMA. The parcel is zoned RL-3, Lakeshore Residence District. This property is located on Garnet Drive on the channel leading to Little Muskego Lake. The petitioner is seeking the following variances: A. An exception to the accessory structure height requirement for a second story garage addition. A maximum height of 15-feet is allowed for accessory structures as measured from the average grade at the front of the building to the mid point of the highest gable. The petitioner seeks a height, as measured by code, of 20-feet for a 2nd story addition to their existing detached garage, and is therefore requesting a 5-foot variance to the accessory structure height requirement. AND Appeal # 01-2007 ZBA 04-26-2007 Page 1 of 2 B. An exception to the "50% Rule" for a non -conforming accessory structure. The material costs for additions to non -conforming structures are limited to 50% of the assessed fair market value (FMV). The existing garage on the property has a FMV of $8,000, which allows $4,000 (50% of $8,000) to be put into materials for an addition. The petitioner seeks a garage addition with materials valued at $14,120, and is therefore requesting a $10,120 variance. DISCUSSION Based upon the submitted information staff did find a valid hardship. Due to the restrictions of the floodway, an addition to the house is not possible and that the only other option that is possible for storage and a safe play area would be a second story addition to the existing garage. This addition would not have any negative impacts upon the floodway or floodfringe. If the garage were to be attached to the house, which is not allowed because of the floodway, the height could then be up to 30' to the mid -point of the highest gable and the "50% Rule" would not be exceeded since the house and the garage combined have a much greater value. The petitioner has looked at and researched all of the possible options to meet their needs and there is only this one option that is possible, which is what they have chosen to pursue. NOTE: Please remember that the City must base their recommendation upon a valid hardship as defined by State Law and Zoning Case Law. Zoning Case Law states that a hardship must be unique to the property, it cannot be self-created, and must be based upon conditions unique to the property rather than conditions personal to the property owners(s). Case Law also states that a hardship should be something that would unreasonably prevent the owner from using their property for the permitted purpose or would render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, THE CITY STAFF REPRESENITIVE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS: Approval of Appeal 01-2007, allowing a 20-foot high accessory structure (as measured by code to the mid -point of the highest gable) for the construction of a second story addition to an existing detached garage, requiring a 5-foot variance and a "50% Rule" variance of $10,120, citing that the variances preserve the intent of the Zoning Ordinance because there are exceptional conditions applying to the parcel that do not apply to other properties. The floodplain and floodway on this property restricts new building footprints from being constructed, which eliminates other alternatives. Appeal # 01-2007 ZBA 04-26-2007 Page 2 of 2 Appeal #01-2007 Supplemental Map LEGEND Agenda Item(s) Preliminary Floodplain Property ,# / Right-of-way Floodway • • • Flood Fringe C ITY OF Prepared by City of Muskego Planning MUSKEG( 419I2007�RmeM Petitioner: John Skalla W182 S6521 Garnet Drive 0 04/19/2007 r pm 04/19/2007 I CITY OF DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET USKY I PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 Applicant (Please Print or Type) Date: - ✓ 7 Name: --o11,7 Business Name: Address: fv✓/$a S65-Al 6arpef r, City: muskState: Zip Code: JC JS Phone Number: Fax Number: F,2,w- �?;71 Mobile Number: K3 9! _ 9Vn E-mail Address: _6n, $/f,Ldae Property Owner (Please Print or Type) This section can be left blank if the same as above. Name: I J Business Name: 77 Address: City: State: Zip Code: F Phone Number: Fax Number: Mobile Number: E-mail Address: Please fill out the information below regarding the proposed dimensional variance. Location/Address: I /o� s6 7 Tax Key Number(s): I ffi,51CG a217'1 1857- To allow: S ee , -f-tuc e&t he,yxt_ 61' A0' ro the ,y►/dpo�,,to� �� H'1��f9�6/e. A literal enforcement of the terms of :L• 4.5A,.i::�,dn5 clue. to be,'y in A. /eqa/ noneew ArYnPe_ hamr, the above -referenced section would Site /"A a F-/aadwo( result in practical difficulty and 2, heed 4, noU,•flaHal Sto,-� beCctuae W /Uo f�u���ue fu unnecessary hardship because: -41ood IV and WatP.- t,�7.e he.ytit. tfG,cje 3. Neeor r o_ so,ceo�� $euu'e 0/-ee ' -Mac CA' 6 latX ai,Q � - - - �Page 1 of 4 _. April 6, 2007 City of Muskego Planning Department W 182 S8200 Racine Ave. Muskego, WI 53150 Dear Members of the Board, I'm writing to request a variance to add a second story to my existing garage. The second story would be used for storage and a safe, secure children's play area. The current code states the outbuilding structure cannot exceed 15' in height to the midpoint of the highest gable if the structure is not attached to the residence. We are unable to attach our home and garage per the DNR (see letter attached). I'm requesting a variance to build to the height of 20' at the midpoint to the gable. My hardship for the request is as follows: 1. The lot is a legal non -conforming home site in a floodw-ay. Due to our home existing in a floodway, the DNR will not allow the expansion of the footprint. Therefore, I'm unable to conned the garage to the house. If I could connect the two structures, both the city code and DNR restrictions would allow the addition to the garage. 2. Due to the home site location in the floodway and the height level of the water table, I'm unable to have a basement. Therefore I have very limited space for storage of typical personal belongings for our family of four. 3. In addition, without a basement, I have limited space for my children to play. With a legal non -conforming narrow lot, the proximity of the water and the street, and the cold climate, I'm requesting a warm, safe, and secure place for children to play. If allowed, I will need an additional variance allowing me to exceed the 50% value rule of $4,000 (see attached email from Adam Trzebiatowski, City Associate Planner) to complete the build with compatible aesthetically appealing materials. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully Submitted, 11�,r /W John R.Skalla John and Kelly Skalla W 182 S6521 Garnet Dr. Muskego, WI 53150 262.971.0715 414.339.4081 'Heinrichs, Gary G - DNR' To <john.skalla@bayerbms.com> o <Gary.Heinrk*s@Wisconsin. gor' cc 04102/200711:15 AM be c Subject RE: FkWway Building Permit Yes, expansions to structures in floodway areas are generally not permitted since the increased footprint would cause further obstructions to flood flows, raising the flood heights upstream of your property. You should contact your community's zoning office for information on any additional restrictions on floodway property. Gary Heinrichs Floodplain Planning Program Manager Bureau of Watershed Management Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (*) phone: (608) 266-3093 (*) fax: (608) 267-2800 (*) e-mail: gary.heinrichs@dnr.state.wi.us "Those who don't remember floods won't plan for flooding" -----Original Message ----- From: Kelly Skalla [mailto:kskalla@wi.rr.com) Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:49 AM To: Heinrichs, Gary G - DNR Cc: John Skalla Subject: Floodway Building Permit Gary, I live in a floodway on Jewel Crest Creek on Little Muskego Lake. I am looking to put an addition on my garage which is currently legal nonconforming. I have been told in the past that I could go up on it but could not expand my "footprint" in any direction. Can you please confirm? If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me @ 414-339-4081 or @ john.skalla@bayerbms.com . Thank you for your time. Sincerely, John R. Skalla "Adam Trzebiatowski' " <atrzebiatowski@ci.muskego. wi.us> 03/30/2007 08:23 AM To <john.skalla@bayerbms.com> cc bcc Subject Value of your Garage The Fair Market Value (FMV) of the garage is $8,000. This means that the 50% value that the materials can not exceed by code is $4,000. For your variance, you need to include what the material cost list (excluding labor) will be for the alterations. It should state specifically how much above the $4,000 you would need a variance for. Thanks, Adam Trzebiatowski Planner City of Muskego Planning Department W182 S8200 Racine Ave. 262-679-5598 262-679-5614 Fax atrzebiatowski@ci.muskego.wi.us www.gomuskego.com/planning V4/VJ/V/ 71'C 11:4J rAA 414 0/1 /VOJ albna IM WJVVI � - I 330 W. Drexel Avenue, Suite 4 Oak Creek, WI 63154 Phone: (414)-570-0500 Fax: (414) 570-0505 Project: John Skala W182 S6521 Garnet Dr. Muskego, WI 53150 Add 2" d story to Garage. MATERIALS LIST: 6 - 1x4 concrete footings for steel posts 1050. 6- steel posts 3'/z dia. X 8f.t. 410. 2- 24ft. x 8" steel I teem 1600. 16- Engineered 117/81 Joist 1350. 7- Side by Side 36 x 20 casement type windows. 1470. 1- Patio door 700. 23- sq, or 1850 sq. ft. cement board siding.& window trim, corners 3200, 14- bundles 25 year architectural asphault shingles. 360. 3- rolls roofing underlayment 90. Aluminum soffit and rain gutters, 1200. Framing lumber, 2x4s and decking, and sheathing, 1800, Roof trusses 890. TOTAL 14,120. V4/VJ/Ul !l't 11:40 rAA 414 D11 (VOD i.". W-1VV1 Project: John Skala W1192 96521 Garnet Dr. Muskego, WI 53150 Project: Add Second floor 3 season room to garage. Summary of work. Remove and dispose of existing roof system on garage. Install footing tubes per engineered plan. Install steel support posts and steel I beams for 2n4 floor joist, Frame second floor, deck ,2x4walls, roof trusses, sheathing, and shingles. Install all windows and doors, Install cement board siding. Interior work by home owner. i/r } } US.- `EGO City of Muskegs Residential Accessory Structure Worksheet This worksheet is designed to assist applicants in determining hove large their accessory structure can be. Boathouses and structures where, in the opinion of the Planning Deparfinent�taff,-f a arm c t ctural appearance is not compatible with the applicant's surrounding areG are required to receive Plan Commission approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Please sea the Assessor for Residence Floor Area In Square Feet (SF), and the Planning Department for Land Area and Setbacks, and follow the steps below. Questions regarding the use of this worksheet should be directed to the Zoning Administrator at (262) 679.4136 or Imuenkelacl.muskego.wi.us PROPERTY INFORMATION: (Red to be completed by applicant; Blue to be completed by Planning Department and Assessor Staff) Property Address: Wl1 ?. S t,1521 (ycwpe- Tax Key No. Zoning: R — COLS Residence Floor Area (Total SF): Land Area (SF):-7,�,sr Setbacks; Front - (Wu& s,.A) 2.5 Sides - 6.rw7� I0� Rear-. Se (0,01*k sry BASE AREA DETERMINATION: 1. Enter the total Assessed Floor Area of the res<dence from above in Box 1 �J 7 2. Multiply the number in Box 1 by 0.6 and place this number in Bex 2. r-2 3, Accessory structure size is limited to the greater of 720 square feet or 60% of the j Assessed Floor Area of the residence. If the number in Box 2 is larger than 720, I /y�� enter that number in Box 3. If the number in Box 2 is smaller than 720, then enter 720 in Box 3. AREA BONUS 01 - LOCATION OF PROPOSED STRUCTURE If the setbacks proposed are not greater than the minimum requirements listed above, then enter "0" in Box 7 and skip to Step e. 4. Determine the shortest minimum side and rear and offset from above, and enter the value in Box 4. 4. y 5. From your proposed build!ng location,, determine the distance to all side and rear iot 5. t�f lines. Enter your shortest proposed side or rear yard offset in Box S. 6. If the number in Box 4 is equal to the number in Box 5 enter "0' in Box 6. If Box 5 is greater than the number in Box 4, enter the difference in Box e. 7. Multiple the value in Box 6 by 10. If the value in Box 6 is less than 300, enter the number in Box 7. If the value in Box 6 is equal to or greater than 300, then enter 300 in Box 7. The number in Box 7 is the area bonus permitted based upon the location of your proposed structure. a OVER► AA TT r `t. ' '... L!�VFi J.�i'`!�fi L1•V Ur R'�-- :U�i AREA BONUS *12 . PARCEL SIZE (NOT APPLICABLE FOR PARCELS LESS THAN 1 ACRE) 8. Enter the Land Area of the property, identified above, in Box 8. 8 798,E If the number in Box 8 is less than or equal to 40,000, enter "0' in Box 9 AND Box 11 O and skip to Step 12. If the number in Box 8 is greater than 40,000, multiply Box 8 by 9. 0.02 and enter the result in Box 9. If the value in Box 2 is greater than or equal to Box 9, then enter `0° in Box 11 and skip to Step 12, 10. 9 Subtract 40,000 from the number in Box 8 and enter the value in Box 10. 10. Multiply the number in Box 10 by 0.01, and round down to the nearest 10. Enter this 11. O i number In Box 11. The number in Box 11 is the area bonus permitted based upon the size of your parcel. DETERMINE THE TOTAL PERMITTED STRUCTURE SIZE 12. Copy the information from Box 3, Box 7, and Box 11 here, and place the sum in Box 12. P. + plus O I plus v equals / G� 13. If the number in Box 9 is less than the number in Box 12, enter the number from Box 12 in Box 13. If the number in Box 9 is greater than or equal to the number in Box 12, enter the number from Box 9 in Box 13. The number in Box 13 is the total permitted structure size. HEIGHT v . All accessory structures are permitted to be 15-feet in height by right. Height is measured from the average finished grade at the front building line to the highest point of the midpoint _off the highest gable of a traditi mansard, ambrel, hip,,orpitch roof. Mid point is determined by drawing a horizon zero egrees) line between �m.. --- e points where a wa$s intersect the roof deck or an average thereof. Then draw a perpendicular line from the horizontal line to the highest point of the gable. The midpoint of the vertical line shall be the height of the gable roof for the purposes of this ordinance. Height bonuses are permitted, provided that: the bonus will not result in a structure exceeding 20 feet for properties less that 40,000 SF in size; and the bonus will not result in a structure the height permitted for principal structures in the zoning district. • Height bonus for parcels less than 40,000 SF in area: Divided Box 6 above by 5. A. Round down to nearest whole number, and enter in Box A. This value is the height bonus.`E© ^ 3 Height bonus permitted for parcels greater than 40,000 SF in area: Divide Box 10 g• above by 10,000. Round down to nearest whole number, and enter in Box B. This value is the height bonus. Total structure height with bonus may not exceed the height of the residence. Spit 5tat I CASE i.7, 5c0,11E I''=,S' I 23' OfZ midpo;nt of Gp b I` I I � I � � o � � I H L rSV- S <O'+UI .: N^ A y l A O 3U IA P S aN p < h 3 N h < 3 3 N � O hi K 3 n v N N Q a' < h p ip Wham 3 0 ?Q � lfi °o N p ! M N 3 SN lK M S N N a 0 o. h m p 7 h . vO 0 hA Z �2 �No p Jp p O O o + I h 7 j h< %g 0 'no K n a '0 JS) M o" m c 3 a ? g 3cx J ON a+fn E. m 3 n a P U =3N 003 m p O NU na ` 1+0 N O N w jm h h fSp� R S 0 !S a' N 7 p N 7 LA P O N 3,0 It 7 Ohp 4.Q QM q - ? h p ? •+ 0 O Op a N n • tq 10 O 7 p �' 3- N p O ti�6) 7 h P h i0 S pp m R N p a n co m of q gDmm r m i:`i� = C()a_1Z (/) ' - x H J ; V � n h m�q N NV m cA--- -- — 296• - 10 m 0 i C H A N N E L Sakti ealge w 2S Al S. - GARNET DR. ( 40' VIDE PUBLIC R-O-V ) O. CA _y 3 w p O N CD ? I A �w ( V U O �-0 O g cCD O ? � O CD 8N OD N p N C r g _V �q z (n � CD C L. u r1 N C Ip WV - G) f�D c) D "O ^z CD O O m '* �cncn -n > " o o �j (/ �O CD A"-i in C CD n O in C =z O C Cl cn G CD 0 CP Z O ly O� N CD a =3 0 o C) CD SD �i -n yf Z 00— "ZX Wm m m m m 9 K K 9 CA 4 CA N r_ 3 N V V V �1 co (c 0 CC) J O -1 -1 O O co C7) O C =r tv - 0) J. (n J. -S J. fD J. a En 717' N a N LA to (D fD (D ct fD ct fD t0 7r < fD O (D (D (D O (D (D a a z a z r— O J. Fn N Z N < - :=.0 7: -0 J•-o (D X C C (D C < O In t G. (D v 0- 7C' (D fL 0) (D 0- (D J• O cn E3 -s a O C O —.0 t0 O - O =3 a O (D O C7 =3 t0 -S 7 (D 0 O C t D O 3 0 O « a C Z ai — (D (D c"t fn ct ct rt i OP 7: D' =r (n i (D ::� -0 f L r+ (D (0 (D fL (D (D N O N Z (n f ('1 c+ (+ 77 t't (D O f7 'S CD C 1 co C- m I n -i cli D D O m N m w Ul O �` 0 N S?o A N to Z O .. 00 u+ Z °D O O A 0 O w O