Public Works Committee Packet 1-30-12
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF MUSKEGO
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA
DATE: January 30, 2012
TIME: 6:00 P.M.
LOCATION: Aldermen’s Room – Upper Level of City Hall
W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
Muskego, WI 53150
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING HELD November 21, 2011
STATUS OF PROJECTS
Discussion update. No formal action may be taken on any of the following:
1. Janesville Road Reconstruction (Moorland to Lannon)
2. Durham Drive Reconstruction & Sanitary Sewer Project
3. McShane Pump Station Upgrade
4. PPII Reduction & Sanitary Sewer Backup Prevention Programs
5. Tess Corners Drive Reconstruction
6. Pioneer Drive Reconstruction
7. Cornell Drive Storm Sewer Construction
8. Woods Road Recreation Trail Construction
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following:
NEW BUSINESS
Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all the following:
1. Discussion and recommendation regarding construction of water mains within Pioneer Drive.
2. Discussion and recommendation regarding Tess Corners Drive Public Informational Meeting
comments and concerns.
3. Discussion and recommendation of a floodplain study in relation to Tess Corners Creek at the
southern Tess Corners Drive stream crossing.
4. Discussion and recommendation regarding Woods Road Trail Public Informational Meeting
comments and concerns.
5. Recommendation regarding approval of agreement for access and ground water monitoring
between the City and the Muskego Site Consent Decree Implementation Group.
6. Review status of City efforts in response to the rain events of July 22-24, 2010.
7. Review and recommend changes to 28.04(17) of the Municipal Code entitled Purity of Supply Not
To Be Impaired By Cross Connections.
NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE
(The following items have been placed on file for staff review. Upon completion of review, staff will
submit a supplement detailing options and possible course of action to committee members.)
Page 2 of 2
1. Discussion and possible modification of policy regarding mailbox damage incurred during City
maintenance activities.
2. Discussion and possible modification of policy regarding snow removal from private driveways.
COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW
ADJOURNMENT
PLEASE NOTE: It is possible that members of and possibly a quorum of members of other governmental bodies of the municipalit y may be
in attendance at the above-stated meeting to gather information; no action will be taken by any gover nmental body at the above-stated
meeting other than the governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice.
Also, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services.
For additional information or to request this service, contact Muskego City Hall, (262) 679 -4100.
CITY OF MUSKEGO unapproved
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2011
Alderman Noah Fiedler called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Also present were
Alderman Dan Soltysiak, City Engineer David Simpson and Public Works Superintendent
Wayne Delikat. Ald. Keith Werner and Public Utilities Superintendent Scott Kloskowski
absent.
Ald. Fiedler led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
The meeting was noticed in accordance with the Open Meeting Law on November 18, 2011.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 2011
Ald. Soltysiak moved to approve the minutes of October 17, 2011. Seconded by Ald.
Fiedler. Motion carried 2-0.
STAFF REPORTS
None
STATUS OF PROJECTS
Janesville Road Reconstruction (Moorland to Racine) – City Engineer Simpson stated
utilities are well on the way to being buried. Road plans are not finalized.
Durham Drive Reconstruction & Sanitary Sewer Project – City Engineer Simpson advised
Durham Drive will open Wednesday afternoon officially. We will do minor top soiling and
seeding, and in Spring final asphalt.
McShane Pump Station Upgrade – They coated the last of the wet well per City Engineer
Simpson.
PPII Reduction & Sanitary Sewer Backup Prevention Programs – City Engineer Simpson
stated finished the last of the televising last week. One section had defects in lateral, so we
did find some problems.
Tess Corners Reconstruction –Talk about in “New Business” per City Engineer Simpson.
Pioneer Drive Reconstruction – City Engineer Simpson advised under way. Surveys are
complete. Public Information Meeting will be held in January.
Cornell Drive Storm Sewer Construction – City Engineer Simpson stated complete except
for restoration.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS
Review and Acceptance of Bids for the Sale of City Owned Vehicles – City Engineer
stated we had four vehicles for bid and attached memo lists the highest bids. Public Works
2
Superintendent Delikat recommends we accept the highest bid for each. Ald. Soltysiak
made a motion to approve recommendation. Ald. Fiedler seconded. Motion carried 2-0.
Recommend Regarding Amendment to the Agreement between Foth Infrastructure &
Environment, LLC and the City of Muskego for Tess Corners Drive Reconstruction Design –
City Engineer Simpson advised soil borings are completed and geotechnical engineer has
completed his full analysis and design. Soil conditions are worse than anticipated and will
result in the need for greater than anticipated soil modifications. Because of the required
substructure modifications, the construction costs will be greater than originally anticipated.
Foth prepared a construction cost estimate for various alternatives. Because of the large
amount of substructure work required, it was determined that an off-road recreational trail
would result in lower construction costs. The estimated construction cost savings will vary
from $334,000 to $434,000. Added expenses to complete the off-road path will be
additional soil borings, minor right of way acquisition, and increased design services.
Assuming that the additional right-of-way acquisition and design expenses total no more
than $100,000, the modified design will still save the City a minimum of approximately
$234,000. Knowing this and that the City’s Park & Recreation Board’s preferred alternative
for pathways is off-road, recommendation would be to review and recommend proposed
amendment to Foth’s design contract that will allow for the design of an off-road recreational
trail. Ald. Soltysiak made a motion to move to approve recommendation. Ald. Fiedler
seconded. Motion carried 2-0.
NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE
None.
COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW
Ald. Soltysiak said “THANK YOU to Public Works” for leaves cleaned up.
ADJOURNMENT
Ald. Soltysiak moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:18 PM. Ald. Fiedler seconded. Motion
carried 2-0.
Jeanne Struck
Recording Secretary
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Discussion and recommendation regarding construction of water mains
within Pioneer Drive
Date: January 26, 2012
During the planning process for the reconstruction of Pioneer Drive, the design and
construction of water main was anticipated. Preliminary design was completed,
which includes a north section (from the Park Garage to Janesville Road) and a
south section (from Lions Park Drive to Racine Avenue), which are being looked at
separately and discussed below:
North Section: The north section is important to construct for a few reasons: 1)
Opinions were obtained through the citizen group in this area and the majority
strongly favor this extension. 2) The water main in this area will be under new
pavement and will tie into Janesville Road, meaning it is important that we
construct this section now so that we won’t have to damage the road after it has
been reconstructed. 3) This water main loop will provide for more options when
operating the system and will provide for more reliable water service in this area.
South Section: The south section is not as important to construct at this time based
on the following reasons: 1) The preliminary design shows that we will be able to
construct outside the pavement area so future construction will not impact the road.
2) A survey was sent (example attached) to the 75 residents that could be potentially
affected by this project to gauge their opinion regarding it and the following results
were received:
Extremely
Interested
Somewhat
Interested
Interested Somewhat
Disinterested
Extremely
Disinterested
0 3 2 0 41
Recommendation:
Do not move forward with construction of the southern half of the water main on
Pioneer Drive. Proceed with the completion of an Engineer’s Estimate and plan a
Public Hearing and begin the standard assessment process for the north half of the
water main on Pioneer Drive.
Detach here and mail no later than 1-17-2012
January 5, 2012
«OWNERNAME»«OWNNM2»
«MAILINGADD»
«POSTOFFICE» «ZIPCODE»
Dear Resident/Property Owner:
Please reference the enclosed letter regarding a scheduled Public Informational Meeting for the reconstruction
of Pioneer Drive. In that letter, I discuss the importance of gaining feedback from residents relating to the
potential for the installation of water mains to service their properties. If you have received this letter we are
hoping to receive your initial opinion regarding the potential for water main construction to serve your property.
The construction of water mains to service your property would involve a special assessment process which
would ultimately lead to a cost to you as a property owner. This cost is based on the estimated cost to construct
the water main. At this time, the estimated assessment for your property would be in the range of
$«Low_Est».00 to $«High_Est».00. This is the cost to construct the water main and the water lateral to your lot
line only and would be payable with a ten year payment plan at an established interest rate (currently 8%).
Additional costs above this assessment would include the construction of the water lateral into your home by a
plumber and a water capacity assessment (WCA). All these are discussed in more detail on the enclosed water
utility information sheet.
At this time, I am requesting that you return the bottom portion of this letter in the self-addressed &
stamped envelope no later than January 17th, 2012 so that we can discuss this matter further at the Public
Works Committee Meeting scheduled for January 23rd, 2012.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me directly at (262) 679-5686.
Sincerely,
David Simpson
David Simpson, P.E.
Director of Public Works
ENGINEERING DIVISION
W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, PO Box 749
Muskego, Wisconsin 53150-0749
(262) 679-4145 FAX (262) 679-5614
SURVEY REGARDING WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ON PIONEER DRIVE
Property Address: «PROPERTYAD»
Name/s: ____________________________________ Phone Number (optional):______________________
Please circle your level of interest in receiving City water service as discussed in the above letter and return in the enclosed
envelope as soon as possible:
Very Interested Somewhat Interested Interested Somewhat Disinterested Extremely Disinterested
Additional Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Discussion and recommendation regarding Tess Corners Drive Public
Informational Meeting comments and concerns
Date: January 26, 2012
On Wednesday, December 14th, a public informational meeting was held at City
Hall to display the current construction plans for the Tess Corners Drive
Reconstruction (from Woods Road to Janesville Road). These public meetings are
held to help the public gain understanding of the project and help staff gain
valuable feedback from residents.
Overall, staff felt the project’s plans were received well, however, with any project
there were some concerns and/or questions. Many of these questions can be
answered by staff or the consultant, however, there are some items that we felt the
Committee should discuss and are as follows:
Will the City be replacing their exiting concrete driveways with concrete or
asphalt?
Currently, the City has no official policy related to the replacement of
concrete driveways with a project like this. There is approximately 5,000
square feet of concrete driveways on this project that would be removed
and replaced as part of this project. With the cost difference between
asphalt and concrete being approximately $2.50/s.f., to have concrete
drives on this project will add approximately $12,500 to the project cost.
Staff recommends replacing all driveways with the same material they
were originally constructed of except for specialty drives such as
pavers/stamped concrete.
Many residents requested that the City do whatever it can to move the path
closer to the road to reduce the perceived impact to their front yard. More
specifically some residents have requested that we shift the entire road to “share
the pain” in losing some of their yard.
While staff fully understands the impact the proposed recreational trail
will have on property owner’s yards, there needs to be a balance between
cost, benefit, and other impacts. As is the case with all recreational trail
installations, one side of the street will have the path along it, while the
other does not. If we were to try to shift the roadway over to accommodate
the request of centering the project, there would be multiple impacts.
Page 2 of 2
First, the sanitary sewer would no longer be centered in the street which
can lead to premature structure failure and potential added infiltration.
Secondly, the redesign costs and added construction costs will be in the
range of $50,000-$100,000 depending upon the amount of additional
ROW acquisition and additional costs for constructing the roadway off
alignment. Should we move forward with a redesign I strongly suggest
having another PIM prior to moving ahead with the change. Staff
suggests keeping the roadway’s centerline in its current location and
adjusting the path where possible, while keeping an adequate distance to
maintain a safe clear zone.
Some residents requested that the City do whatever it can to save the trees that
are shown for removal or to replace trees that we remove (in the ROW).
The City does avoid tree removal whenever possible, however, many
times it becomes too costly or impossible to design around a tree. The
City’s past practice has been not to replace trees that are removed from the
right-of-way. Should this practice change, very many City projects would
require a great deal more funding for the replacement of trees. Staff
recommends not replacing trees that are removed from the right-of-way.
Some residents are very concerned about making sure that we look at potential
flooding solutions prior to the roadwork occurring.
This item is discussed under new business item #3.
Recommendation:
Discuss each item and direct staff as to how to proceed.
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Discussion and recommendation of a floodplain study in relation to Tess
Corners Creek at the southern Tess Corners Drive stream crossing
Date: January 26, 2012
During the initial planning process for the reconstruction of Tess Corners Drive,
staff and the Committee had discussed studying how revising the culvert crossing of
Tess Corners Creek might affect the floodplain upstream and downstream of the
crossing. This study would have been very easy to complete utilizing the WDNR
and FEMA digital models. Since the reconstruction of Tess Corners began, we have
been in contact with the WDNR, FEMA, and SEWRPC and they have now told us
that the model is either lost or does not exist. This means that we would have to
recreate the entire model, have it approved by the appropriate agencies, and then
utilize it to see if there are any alternative culvert configurations that may result in a
reduction to upstream flooding.
I asked Foth to put a cost estimate together for this work so that we can discuss
moving forward at the Committee. The attached proposal from Foth would provide
all necessary modeling and alternatives analysis to determine if a culvert
modification is possible. Should a modification be possible, the cost vs. benefit will
also need to be examined by the City.
In speaking with the WDNR and Foth, neither was able to speculate as to whether
something can be done to reduce upstream flooding without having the base model
in place, so it is a complete unknown as to what the odds of improving the situation
is at this point.
There are many structures in the upstream area that do encounter flooding and it
has been an issue for the City for decades. The regional pond that was proposed in
New Berlin does not look like a possibility without grants, so this may be the only
remaining alternative to examine.
Recommendation:
Discuss whether the committee would like to move forward with this study at this
time.
X:\ML\IE\Proposal\Muskego, WI (City of)\Tess Corners Drive (9-11)\L - Simpson Floodplain Modeling 1-18-2012.doc
Lincoln Center II • 2514 South 102nd Street, Suite 278
West Allis, WI 53227
(414) 336-7900 • Fax: (414) 336-7901
www.foth.com
January 26, 2012
Mr. Dave Simpson, PE,
Director of Public Works
City of Muskego
W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
PO Box 749
Muskego, WI 53150-0749
Dear Dave,
RE: Scope and Fee Proposal
Tess Corners Creek HEC-RAS Floodplain Modeling
Tess Corners Drive Reconstruction Project
The following constitutes our proposal for Professional Services for the above referenced project.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
1. Overview: The City is interested in evaluating the floodplain impacts to
property owners along the creek that would result from modifying the culverts
located under Tess Corners Drive just east of Cornell Drive. Impacts would be
anticipated for property owners upstream and downstream of the creek crossing.
No analysis will be performed for the creek upstream of the existing box culvert
located adjacent to the fire station. The downstream limits of analysis will be the
southern limits of the nursery property where the Tess Corners Creek bends and
heads east toward Woods Road.
We have made efforts to contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) and the Southeastern Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) to
obtain all available hydrologic, hydraulic, and computer models for Tess Corners
Creek. Available HEC-RAS information has only been discovered for the far
northern reaches of the creek and no electronic modeling data is available from
north of Tess Corners Drive to the southern City of Muskego limits.
The work effort will consist of building an electronic HEC-RAS model for the
portion of the creek in the project area from the available 1980 HEC-2 data
provided by SEWRPC and calibrating the model to the calculated elevations in
1980 and also the recent 2008 FEMA remapping efforts. After a calibrated
working HEC-RAS model is established, three alternatives for increased culvert
capacity and storage volume will be evaluated and presented to the City.
Mr. Dave Simpson, PE
City of Muskego
January 26, 2012
Page 2
X:\ML\IE\PROPOSAL\MUSKEGO, WI (CITY OF)\TESS CORNERS DRIVE (9-11)\L - SIMPSON FLOODPLAIN MODELING 1-
18-2012.DOC
2. Foth Project Team:
Mike Steiner, Project Manager / Modeling
Maggie Anderson, Project Engineer / Data input and modeling
John Dabrowski, Technical Coordinator / Modeling QA/QC
Scott Henkel, Registered Land Surveyor / Field data collection
3. Consultant Schedule: Completion of the work and presentation of a
technical memo within 60 working days from authorization to proceed, weather
dependent.
4. Documentation Reviewed: Data available from WDNR and SEWRPC
5. City to Provide: Access to the properties along the creek for field surveying
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. Data Collection
a. Collect all electronic and hard copy files of previous modeling efforts
from WDNR and SEWRPC for Tess Corners Creek in the City of
Muskego
b. Provide supplemental field surveys for validation of critical data points at
culvert locations and selected cross sections upstream and downstream of
the Tess Corners Drive creek crossing.
2. Create Existing Conditions HEC-RAS Model
a. Manual data entry of HEC 2 information from 1980 analysis.
b. Calibrate model to produce similar floodplain elevations to 1980 analysis
c. Input field data and existing culvert configuration at Tess Corners Drive to
represent 2008 conditions.
d. Calibrate model to produce similar floodplain elevations to the 2008
FEMA documents.
e. Coordinate and gain consensus on model accuracy with WDNR Water
Management Engineer.
3. Create Future Conditions HEC-RAS Model
a. Attend a scoping meeting with City of Muskego and WDNR to discuss
culvert crossing alternatives.
Mr. Dave Simpson, PE
City of Muskego
January 26, 2012
Page 3
X:\ML\IE\PROPOSAL\MUSKEGO, WI (CITY OF)\TESS CORNERS DRIVE (9-11)\L - SIMPSON FLOODPLAIN MODELING 1-
18-2012.DOC
b. Build Alternative #1 model to represent only increased culvert capacity.
Evaluate results to property owners upstream and downstream of Tess
Corners Drive.
c. Build Alternative #2 model to represent addition storage capacity
throughout the project area with no existing culvert modifications.
Evaluate results to property owners upstream and downstream of Tess
Corners Drive.
d. Build Alternative #3 model to represent a combination of increased culvert
capacity and increased storage capacity downstream of the Tess Corners
Drive. Evaluate results to property owners upstream and downstream of
Tess Corners Drive.
e. Prepare budgetary cost estimates for each alternative.
f. Prepare Technical Memo summarizing work effort and results.
g. Present Technical Memo to Public Works Committee
COMPENSATION
Based on the Project Understanding and the Scope of Services above, we propose
professional service fees on a Time and Expense basis for an estimated range
of $29,000 to $32,500.
Respectfully submitted,
Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC
Michael P. Steiner, PE
Project Manager
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Discussion and recommendation regarding Woods Road Trail Public
Informational Meeting comments and concerns
Date: January 26, 2012
On Monday, January 23, a public informational meeting was held at City Hall to
display the current construction plans for the Woods Road Trail (from Racine
Avenue to Quietwood Drive). These public meetings are held to help the public gain
understanding of the project and help staff gain valuable feedback from residents.
Overall, staff felt the project’s plans were received well, however, with any project
there were some concerns and/or questions. Many of these questions can be
answered by staff or the consultant, however, there are some items that we felt the
Committee should discuss and are as follows:
Many residents requested that the City consider a ditch enclosure in front of
their home in order to move the path closer to the road.
This request would cost approximately $100 per lineal foot of enclosure.
This proposed trail section is approximately 2 miles long, meaning that if
we enclosed the entire ditch we could triple the cost of the project from
$600,000 to $1,800,000. The current project budget is very tight and
adding any enclosures that are not needed will most certainly put the
project over budget. Staff recommends only utilizing ditch enclosures
where absolutely necessary for design reasons.
Many residents requested that the City do whatever it can to move the path
closer to the road to reduce the perceived impact to their front yard.
This can be accomplished in many cases by increasing the side slope of
the ditch. If this is done, the ditch will become more difficult to maintain
for the homeowner. The City may wish to allow for steeper ditch sections
if it is what the homeowners are requesting. However, this request cannot
be individualized and managed on a project of this scale. Staff
recommends utilizing a steeper slope only where it will eliminate the need
to grade onto private property.
Some residents requested that the City do whatever it can to save the trees that
are shown for removal or to replace trees that we remove (in the ROW).
Page 2 of 2
The City does avoid tree removal whenever possible, however, many
times it becomes too costly or impossible to design around a tree. The
City’s past practice has been not to replace trees that are removed from the
right-of-way. Should this practice change, very many City projects would
require a great deal more funding for the replacement of trees. Staff
recommends not replacing trees that are removed from the right-of-way.
Recommendation:
Discuss each item and direct staff as to how to proceed.
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Review and approve an Agreement for Access and Groundwater
Monitoring
Date: January 26, 2012
The attached cover letter discusses the Muskego Site Groundwater Remediation
Group’s (MSGRG) request to enter into an agreement for the placement of four
additional groundwater monitoring wells. The MSGRG will be placing these wells
per the attached agreement, which are required per an agreement they reached with
the USEPA.
Staff has review the proposed locations and do not see any negative impacts. The
agreement is in the same form as the previously approved agreement that was
entered into for prior wells in 2004. The only difference is the name of the group.
Recommendation:
Recommend approval of the attached agreement.
REMEDIAL DESIGN / REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLAN
MUSKEGO SANITARY LANDFILL
MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN
PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATION
MW-20
PAPEZ J
JANUARY 2012
004124-001
071330312_mb.mxd
MW-20
DRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
PROJ. NO.:
FILE NO.:
Í!(
MSKC2225999006
MSKC2225999019
MSKC2228999021
MSKC2225999018
MSKC2228999020
CONDO
CONDO
CONDO
MSKC2225999015
CONDO
MSKC2225999016
MSKC2228016
MSKC2228999010
MSKC2228017
MSKC2228999008
MSKC2228028MSKC2228018
MSKC2228026
MSKC2228027
MSKC2228999018
MSKC2228019
MSKC2228999019MSKC2228029MSKC2228020
MSKC2225999010MSKC2225074
MSKC2228046
MW-20
Janesv
i
l
l
e
R
d
Janesv
i
l
l
e
R
d
Apol
l
o
D
r
Apol
l
o
D
r
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
W
a
y
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
W
a
y&0 200 400
FEET
1:2,400
1 INCH = 200 FEET
E:\RMT_DATA\PRE_TESS_PROJECTS\07133\03\MXD\071330312_mb.mxdPrinted By: JPAPEZ on 1/10/2012
708 Heartland Trail
Suite 3000Madison, WI 53717
Phone: 608.826.3600
BASE MAP IMAGERY FROM ESRI/BING BASE MAP LAYER, "BING MAPS AERIAL", 2011. PARCEL INFORMATION FROM WAUKESHA COUNTY.
WELL ID:
MW-20
OWNER:
CITY OF MUSKEGO
ADDRESS:
CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY -
APOLLO DR
LEGEND
Í!(PROPOSED MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
RIGHT-OF-WAY
REMEDIAL DESIGN / REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLAN
MUSKEGO SANITARY LANDFILL
MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN
PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATION
MW-21A
PAPEZ J
JANUARY 2012
004124-001
071330312_mb.mxd
MW-21A
DRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
PROJ. NO.:
FILE NO.:
Í!(
MSKC2237992MSKC2238999
MSKC2237064
MSKC2227116
MSKC2227988002
MSKC2227986
MSKC2227988001
MSKC2228996
MSKC2227987
MSKC2227985
MSKC2227985002
MSKC2227985001
MSKC2237998
MSKC2227012 MSKC2227089
MSKC2237034
MSKC2237035
MSKC2237033
MSKC2237036
MSKC2227097
MSKC2227092
MSKC2227093
MSKC2227099
MSKC2227100
MSKC2227096
MSKC2227094
MSKC2227098
MSKC2227095
MSKC2237032
MW-21A
Woods RdWoods Rd
Pl
u
m
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
Pl
u
m
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
Greenhaven CtGreenhaven Ct Turn
b
e
r
r
y
C
t
Turn
b
e
r
r
y
C
t
&0 200 400
FEET
1:2,400
1 INCH = 200 FEET
E:\RMT_DATA\PRE_TESS_PROJECTS\07133\03\MXD\071330312_mb.mxdPrinted By: JPAPEZ on 1/10/2012
708 Heartland Trail
Suite 3000Madison, WI 53717
Phone: 608.826.3600
BASE MAP IMAGERY FROM ESRI/BING BASE MAP LAYER, "BING MAPS AERIAL", 2011. PARCEL INFORMATION FROM WAUKESHA COUNTY.
WELL ID:
MW-21A
OWNER:
CITY OF MUSKEGO
ADDRESS:
WOODS RD
LEGEND
Í!(PROPOSED MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
RIGHT-OF-WAY
REMEDIAL DESIGN / REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLAN
MUSKEGO SANITARY LANDFILL
MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN
PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATION
MW-22A
PAPEZ J
JANUARY 2012
004124-001
071330312_mb.mxd
MW-22A
DRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
PROJ. NO.:
FILE NO.:
Í!(
Wi
n
d
o
v
e
r
C
t
Wi
n
d
o
v
e
r
C
t
MSKC2238992
MSKC2238994
MSKC2233999
MSKC2238996001
MSKC2238997 MSKC2238999
MSKC2238995
MSKC2238993
MSKC2236994 MSKC2239999MSKC2239998
MSKC2237061
MSKC2227989006
MW-22A
NOTE:
LOCATION TO BE DEPENDENT ON
FINAL ACCESS ASSESSMENT.
&0 200 400
FEET
1:4,800
1 INCH = 400 FEET
E:\RMT_DATA\PRE_TESS_PROJECTS\07133\03\MXD\071330312_mb.mxdPrinted By: JPAPEZ on 1/10/2012
708 Heartland Trail
Suite 3000Madison, WI 53717
Phone: 608.826.3600
BASE MAP IMAGERY FROM ESRI/BING BASE MAP LAYER, "BING MAPS AERIAL", 2011. PARCEL INFORMATION FROM WAUKESHA COUNTY.
WELL ID:
MW-22A
OWNER:
CITY OF MUSKEGO
ADDRESS:
S92W19656
HENNEBERRY
LEGEND
Í!(PROPOSED MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
RIGHT-OF-WAY
REMEDIAL DESIGN / REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLAN
MUSKEGO SANITARY LANDFILL
MUSKEGO, WISCONSIN
PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATION
MW-24A
PAPEZ J
JANUARY 2012
004124-001
071330312_mb.mxd
MW-24A
DRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
PROJ. NO.:
FILE NO.:
Í!(
MSKC2235999
MSKC2235998
MSKC2234996
MSKC2235998002
MSKC2278993
MSKC2234996
MSKC2235997
MSKC2235998001
MSKC2234996002
MW-24A
NOTE:
TO BE FLUSH MOUNTED WELL.
Henneberry DrHenneberry Dr
C
r
o
w
b
a
r
D
r
C
r
o
w
b
a
r
D
r&0 200 400
FEET
1:2,400
1 INCH = 200 FEET
E:\RMT_DATA\PRE_TESS_PROJECTS\07133\03\MXD\071330312_mb.mxdPrinted By: JPAPEZ on 1/17/2012
708 Heartland Trail
Suite 3000Madison, WI 53717
Phone: 608.826.3600
BASE MAP IMAGERY FROM ESRI/BING BASE MAP LAYER, "BING MAPS AERIAL", 2011. PARCEL INFORMATION FROM WAUKESHA COUNTY.
WELL ID:
MW-24A
OWNER:
CITY OF MUSKEGO
ADDRESS:
CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY -
CROBAR DR
LEGEND
Í!(PROPOSED MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
RIGHT-OF-WAY
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Review status of City efforts in response to the rain events of July 22-24,
2010.
Date: January 24, 2012
Since the rain events of July 22-24, 2010, the City has made great strides toward
reducing or eliminating many areas of concern related to water in basements/homes
caused by sanitary sewer conveyance issues and/or overland flooding problems.
The list below summarizes projects and their curren t status related to reducing the
chance of these problems reoccurring during a rainfall event of this type. This list
does not include the many ongoing operation and maintenance activities compl eted
on a regular basis by this department. This list captures the larger projects that
were completed with the City’s goal of reducing reoccurrence risks.
McShane Lift Station Emergency Bypass Pump with Motor & Pump Rehabilitation
Description. This project was planned to create more capacity at the City’s main
sanitary sewage pumping station. It was originally thought that we could add
additional capacity by enlarging the pumps, however, when further engineering
was completed it was determined that the existing discharge piping was already at
its peak capacity. Once discovered, the City quickly designed and permitted a
permanent emergency bypass pump within the station. This pump can be utilized
when flows at the station exceed our pumping capacity and the storage tank is
full. This will allow for immediate sanitary flow bypass when absolutely
necessary. This project also included the rehabilitation of the station’s three
pumps and motors which increased the station’s reliability and capacity.
Status. This project’s emergency bypass component is 100% completed with
99% of all other items are completed to date as well.
Cost. This projects total cost will be approximately $700,000.
Outcome. This project will dramatically reduce the chances of basement backups
in the vicinity of the lift station.
Private Property Infiltration & Inflow Reduction Program
Description. This project has been implemented utilizing grant funds distributed
by the MMSD in an effort to reduce the amount of clear water entry into the
sanitary system from private homes and businesses. The implementation of this
program was based on the MMSD’s schedule and is currently 100% funded by
them. The City has spent a great deal of time identifying the pilot project area
and completing the initial stages of this program. Clear water entry into the
Page 2 of 6
City’s sanitary conveyance system is the main reason for runoff event related
basement backups, therefore the elimination of the sources is critical to preventing
future problems.
Status. 100% of willing homeowner’s properties (70 properties) have been
inspected utilizing state of the art dye injection (most homes). A detailed status
map is attached for reference. Repairs will be made through a voluntary grant
program which will be discussed at a future Public Works Committee Meeting,
and funded through the MMSD.
Cost. This project’s cost thus far been funded through MMSD and the approved
work plans have a budget of $193,000.
Outcome. This is a pilot project aimed at determining a cost vs. benefit
relationship for this type of investigative work. Results will be estimated once all
defects are repaired.
Basement Backup Prevention Program
Description. This program was implemented in coordination with the Private
Property Infiltration & Inflow Reduction Program to incentivize homeowners to
participate in said program. This program offers homeowners a grant incentive of
up to $2,000.00 for the installation of a sanitary backflow prevention device to
reduce the likelihood of future backups at potentially at-risk properties.
Status. Of the 70 homes currently eligible for the funds, two have applied for
grant funding. I expect more will take advantage as we distribute results from the
PPII Reduction inspections.
Cost. This projects cost to date is approximately $3,800.00.
Outcome. While not taken advantage of yet, I believe more homes will utilize the
grants when additional information is distributed to them.
Simandl Drive Lift Station Controls Upgrade
Description. During this large rain event, the lift station controls at this particular
lift station were continually in need of staff attention for pump resets. The
original station controls were below ground and required confined space entry
equipment which took valuable staff time in an emergency situation. The controls
were near the end of their useful life and had become a liability for system
performance. This project moved the entire control module above ground and
into a small building, which will allow for much more reliable operations and
quicker maintenance in an emergency situation.
Status. This project is 99% complete with restoration remaining.
Cost. Project cost to complete is approximately $65,000.00.
Outcome. This project will improve operations at the lift station and lessen the
likelihood of basement backups in this area.
Ryan Road Sanitary Sewer Relay
Description. During the City’s routine sanitary sewer televising program, a defect
was discovered in a section of sanitary sewer along Ryan Road between Jimmy
Demaret Drive and Old Course Way. The pipe had begun to compress with the
Page 3 of 6
possibility of eventual failure. This pipe needed to be completely replaced from
manhole to manhole to reduce any risk of failure that might lead to upstream
problems in the system.
Status. This project was 100% complete in the Spring of 2011.
Cost. Project cost to complete is approximately $50,000.
Outcome. This project was built under budget thanks to the Engineers at R&M
recommending an alternative installation method that was more efficient and
reliable.
Pipe Patching & Manhole Grouting
Description. Manufacturers now offer pipe patch equipment that the City was able
to purchase and utilize with in-house equipment and manpower. Because of this,
City crews are now able to perform pipe patching in-house instead of hiring an
outside company. This patching allows for efficient and reliable pipe repairs when
our routine televising finds a questionable area inside a pipe. We also complete
manhole grouting which reduces the amount of infiltration and inflow into the
City’s system.
Status. This is a continual effort as defects are found, however in 2011, we
completed 13 pipe repairs and grouted 7 manholes.
Cost. Project cost in 2011 was approximately $20,000.
Outcome. This will be an ongoing activity and will reduce chances for infiltration
and inflow.
Woods Road Lift Station Pump Rehabilitation
Description. This project was planned to improve operational efficiency and
reliability of all three pumps at the Woods Road Lift Station.
Status. This project is 100% complete.
Cost. This project’s cost is approximately $11,000.
Outcome. This project will ensure excellent pump performance and reliability.
Portable Pump Purchases
Description. The City purchased two 6” Insta-prime Diesel pumps that can now
be utilized in the case of an emergency like we experienced in 2010. These
pumps can be used for emergency bypassing of sanitary sewer flows that may be
above the capacity of the sewer system.
Status. Both pumps and the necessary hoses have been purchased.
Cost. Both pumps and all hoses cost approximately $66,000.00.
Outcome. While not routinely needed, the pumps add another layer of protection
to the City’s emergency response equipment when they are needed the most.
Fountainwood Drainage Issue
Description. Three homes near the intersection of Longfellow and Saroyan have
experienced overland flooding into their homes on many occasions. The City
commissioned a drainage study at the September 28th, 2010 Common Council
Page 4 of 6
meeting. A report dated November 11, 2010 completed by Ruekert & Mielke
outlined all alternatives considered and also recommended purchase of the homes
or a do nothing alternative. Appraisals were completed and a total estimated
project cost of $830,000.00 was presented.
Status. The Common Council opted to not fund a project of this type without
outside funding.
Cost. The project’s cost to date is approximately $12,000.
Outcome. Staff is continually monitoring grant opportunities in hopes that one
will fit this situation.
Cornell Drive Drainage Issue
Description. Repeated significant overland flooding at and near the intersection
of Cornell Drive and Catalina Drive caused, at a minimum, three homes in this
area to experience flooding into the first floors of their homes. A preliminary
study was completed and the most economical alternative was the creation of a
relief storm sewer. The initial design’s cost estimate was well over the originally
anticipated budget so a redesign was completed. This project’s goal was to
reduce the amount of risk to flooding of the homes in this area.
Status. This project was constructed in the fall of 2011 and is completely
operational with only restoration and punch list items remaining.
Cost. This project’s total cost is approximately $200,000
Outcome. The relief pipe installed will greatly reduce the risk of future flooding
in this area. No large rain events have occurred since the installation, so the
system has not yet been observed in full operation.
Circle Drive and Richdorf/Racine Drainage Issues
Description. Repeated significant flooding on Circle Drive and near the
intersection of Richdorf and Racine Avenue has caused significant flooding to
one single family home and to two two-family homes. The goal of this project is
to reduce the risk of flooding to these properties.
Status. Staff was able to utilize MMSD funds for the full alternatives analysis and
final design. An alternatives analysis will be brought to the February Public
Works Committee meeting for discussion.
Cost. The project’s total cost estimate for design is $40,000 with the construction
cost not yet known, but will most likely be in the range of $180-250K.
Outcome. This project is under alternatives analysis, but it does appear that
multiple options will exist to reduce the risk of flooding in these areas.
Muskego Dr/ East Dr Drainage Issue
Description. Repeated significant flooding at and near the intersection of
Muskego Drive and East Drive has caused multiple reports of cars in ditches and
others stalling in the roadway. The goal of this project is to eliminate the existing
deep ditches while increasing the storm sewer system capacity throughout this
area to reduce the risk of flooding.
Page 5 of 6
Status. This project has been surveyed in-house and design is approximately 75%
completed. WDNR permits will be applied for within the next 30-45 days with
the hopes of receiving the appropriate permits to allow construction in the
Summer of 2012.
Cost. The project’s total cost estimate is approximately $180,000
Outcome. This project is under design, but once constructed, will greatly reduce
flooding in the area.
Martin Dr/Janesville Road Drainage Issue
Description. Significant flooding at the rear of the Lindale Villas Condominiums
that are visible from Janesville Road prompted staff to inspect the existing
conditions that may be causing this problem. Interviewing the homeowners and
examining photographs taken the day of the flooding made it clear that the
problem is related to the existing connection of the concrete pipe under Martin
Drive into the retention pond at the corner of Martin & Janesville Road. I have
worked toward a no cost solution by discussing this problem with the County and
asking if they are willing to assist as part of the Janesville Road project.
Status. As part of Waukesha County’s Janesville Road Reconstruction project,
the County will be disconnecting the existing pipe from the retention pond,
upsizing the pipe and connecting it to the existing creek.
Cost. This project will have no cost to the City.
Outcome. This project should reduce flooding risks to all homeowners who have
had flooding concerns before within Lindale Villas.
Overland flooding of S76 W18109 Janesville Road
Description. The owners of S76 W18109 Janesville Road experienced major
flooding of the first floor of their home in 2008 and 2010. Knowing that the
owners experienced substantial documented loss, staff was able to apply for a
grant that would cover 87.5% of the homes acquisition and demolition costs. This
grant, through the Department of Military Affairs, Division of Emergency
Management was submitted in July of 2011.
Status. Staff received word in early January that the State is complete with their
review and feel that this project has a “very good shot” at receiving the grant.
The final decision is made by FEMA and will most likely not be made for 2 -3
more months.
Cost. The project’s total cost estimate is $165,300, with the City paying about
$21,000 of that total cost.
Outcome. Should we receive this grant, we will be able to remove one of the
City’s most flood prone structures which will provide multiple benefits including
the disconnection of the property from the sanitary system which will prevent
clear water inflow.
Overland flooding along Muskego Dam Road
Description. The owners of multiple homes along Muskego Dam Road had been
complaining of overland flooding impacting their properties for years. In order to
Page 6 of 6
address this problem, a relief sewer was designed to take flows away from the
area that previously backed the water up.
Status. Project is 100% complete.
Cost. The project’s total cost was approximately $18,000 in materials. The pipe
was installed by City forces so labor is not included in this cost.
Outcome. No more flooding has occurred in this area.
Hillview Drive & Luehring Drive Flooding
Description. The owners of multiple properties had complained about flooding
that was damaging property on Luehring Drive including the collapse of a
retaining wall that could have undermined the roadway. The project included the
installation of a new storm sewer system sized to accommodate a large rain event
Status. Project is 99% complete with only minor punch list items remaining.
Cost. The project’s total cost was approximately $285,000
Outcome. A reconstructed roadway with a new storm sewer system that is
designed to accommodate large rain events without causing damage to public or
private property.
Conclusion:
To date, funds in the amount of approximately $2-2.2 million have been spent or
allocated to help reduce the chances of flooding and basement backups since the
storm of July 22-24, 2010. This cost does not include staff time or equipment costs
that were instrumental in making these projects a reality. I feel that the City has
and will continue to bring a high level of protection to its residents.
W200S7203
WILLIAMS DR
S71W19997
TOMAR LN
S71W19857
SIMANDL DR
S71W19943
TOMAR LN
S71W19767
SIMANDL DR
S71W19733
SIMANDL DRS71W19803
SIMANDL DR
S71W19998
WILLIAMS DR
S71W19742
WILLIAMS DRS71W19784
WILLIAMS DRS71W19818
WILLIAMS DR
W199S7150
SIMANDL DR
W199S7184
SIMANDL DR
W199S7163
SIMANDL DR
W199S7185
WILLIAMS DR
S71W19856
WILLIAMS DR
S71W19886
SIMANDL DR
S71W19928
TOMAR LN
S71W20002
TOMAR LN
S71W19964
TOMAR LN
S71W19706
WILLIAMS DR
S71W19852
SIMANDL DR
S71W19820
SIMANDL DR
S71W19782
SIMANDL DR
S71W19744
SIMANDL DR
K2589
K2588
K2587K2586 K2567 K2566
K2565
K2563 K2562 K2561 K2560 K2559
Y
Williams St
Simandl D r
A
dri
an
D
r
Tom er Ln
City of Muskego PP I/I Project
At-Risk Area 1
40 0 40 80 12020
Feet ¯Sanitary Manhole
Sanitary Lateral
Sanitary Main
Storm Main
At Risk Areas
Buildings
Home Inspection
Completed
Lateral Only
No Interest
Muskego Parcels
S81W17385
JOEL DR
S81W17343
JOEL DR
S81W17205
JOEL DR
S81W17533
BRENNAN DR
S82W17226
WOODS RD
S82W17284
WOODS RD
S81W17311
JOEL DR
S82W17262
WOODS RD
S82W17310
WOODS RD
S81W17511
BRENNAN DR
S82W17510
CLEARBROOK DR
S81W17421
JOEL DR
S81W17283
JOEL DR
S82W17488
CLEARBROOK DR S82W17456
CLEARBROOK DR
S81W17565
BRENNAN DR
S81W17241
JOEL DR
S82W17705
BRENNAN DR
S82W17673
BRENNAN DR
W173S8165
EDWARD CT
S82W17737
BRENNAN DR
S81W17473
JOEL DR
W174S8278
CLEARBROOK DR
S81W17730
HAVEN DR
S81W17619
BRENNAN DR
W174S8131
ADAM CT
S81W17651
BRENNAN DR
S81W17587
BRENNAN DR
S81W17656
HAVEN DR
S81W17581
HAVEN DR
S81W17615
HAVEN DR
S81W17688
HAVEN DR
W173S8122
ADAM CT
S81W17553
HAVEN DR
W174S8144
ADAM CT
S81W17651
HAVEN DR
S81W17508
BRENNAN DR
W177S8120
BRENNAN DR
S81W17380
JOEL DR
S81W17604
HAVEN DR
W173S8110
ADAM CT
S81W17703
HAVEN DR
S81W17691
HAVEN DR
S83W17692
CLEARBROOK DR
S81W17490
JOEL DR
S81W17270
JOEL DR
W172S8143
LANNON DR
W172S8115
LANNON DR
W172S8131
LANNON DR
W177S8102
BRENNAN DR
S81W17240
JOEL DR
S81W17204
JOEL DR
W172S8112
EDWARD CT
W172S8126
EDWARD CT
W172S8144
EDWARD CT
S81W17708
BRENNAN DR
S81W17660
BRENNAN DR
S81W17570
BRENNAN DR
S81W17620
BRENNAN DR
W177S8170
BRENNAN DR
W174S8109
ADAM CT
W173S8143
EDWARD CT
W171S8142-44
LANNON DR
W173S8111
EDWARD CT
W173S8129
EDWARD CT
S81W17538
BRENNAN DR
W176S8095
JOEL DR
W171S8168-70
LANNON DR
S82W17225
WOODS RD
W172S8095
LANNON DRS80W17505
HAVEN DR
S82W17532
CLEARBROOK DRS82W17564
CLEARBROOK DRS82W17606
CLEARBROOK DR
S83W17648
CLEARBROOK DR
S83W17670
CLEARBROOK DR
W171S8192-94
LANNON DR
W174S8290
CLEARBROOK DR
S81W17170-72
MOONLIGHT LN
W176S8083
JOEL DR
W174S8102
ADAM CT
W173S8097
EDWARD CT
W172S8098
EDWARD CT
S83W17734
CLEARBROOK DR
W177S8205
BRENNAN DR
K3032 K3033
K3037K3077K3031 K3038
K3021
K3076
10234
I0380 K3068
K3029 K3036K3023
K3067
K3025 10232
K3066 K3024
I0521
K3040
K3008
K3060 K3027 K3035
I0379
K2886K2887
A0234
B0227
B0226
A0233 A0230
A0231
A0229
A0232
B0228 B0224
I0381
K3080 K3079
K3041
K3078
H a v e n D r
Brennan Dr
Joel Dr
L
a
n
n
o
n
D
r
W o o d s R d
Edward Ct
Adam Ct Moon light Ln
C l e a r b r o o k D r
City of Muskego PP I/I Project
At-Risk Area 2
60 0 60 120 18030
Feet ¯Sanitary Manhole
Sanitary Lateral
Sanitary Main
Storm Main
At Risk Areas
Buildings
No Contact
Completed
Lateral Only
No Interest
Muskego Parcels
E0840
E0839
J0112
K1524
I0111 I0110
I0109
J0113
K1536 K3231I0102
K1592K1512
K1535
K1522 K1521 K1520 K1519
K1504
K1523
I0108K1506
K1541 I0107K1507
J0114
K1540K1505 I0106
K1585
I0105
K1586
K1538
K1518 I0104K1515 K1587
K1517K1516 K1588 K1589K1539
K1537 K1590K1544K1542
K1543
K1591K1514
M S Meter vault 1
Junction chamber 1
D
u
r
h
a
m
D
r
E a s y S t
B l u h m C t
McS hane Dr
Pilgrim Dr
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
A
v
e
Bluhm DrI
n
d
ia
n
T
rl
R e s tf u ll L n
I n d e p e n d e n c e D r
W145S7644
DURHAM DR
S77W13607
MC SHANE DR
S75W13950
BLUHM DR
S75W13940
BLUHM DR
W141S7574
FREEDOM AVW142S7571
FREEDOM AV
S74W13999
WOODS RD
S74W13800
COURTLAND LN
W145S7676
DURHAM DR
W145S7628
DURHAM DR
S75W13880
BLUHM CT
S76W13925
BLUHM CT
W143S7514
INDIAN TRAIL
W143S7604
INDIAN TRAIL
S76W14056
MC SHANE DR
S75W13839
BLUHM CT
W137S7520
BLUHM CT
W143S7576
INDIAN TRAIL
S76W13943
BLUHM CT
S75W14592
PILGRIM DR
S75W14093
RESTFULL LN
S76W14501
EASY ST
S76W13975
BLUHM CT
S76W14457
EASY ST
W143S7538
INDIAN TRAIL
S76W14572
EASY ST
S75W13901
BLUHM CT
W143S7632
INDIAN TRAIL
W143S7570
INDIAN TRAIL
W140S7657
FREEDOM AV
S75W14579
PILGRIM DR
S75W14452
EASY ST
S75W14416
EASY ST
S74W14505
SETTLER WAY
S75W14463
PILGRIM DR
W137S7510
BLUHM CT
W143S7615
INDIAN TRAIL
S76W14262
MC SHANE DR
W142S7547
FREEDOM AV
W145S7574
DURHAM DR
S75W14426
PILGRIM DR
S75W13802
BLUHM CT
W142S7513
FREEDOM AV
W141S7598
FREEDOM AV
W144S7509
INDIAN TRAIL
S76W14378
MC SHANE DR
W146S7488
DURHAM DR
W144S7561
INDIAN TRAIL
S75W14150
RESTFULL LN
W141S7615
FREEDOM AV
W142S7535
FREEDOM AV
W142S7510
FREEDOM AV
W142S7680
CONCORD CT
S75W14117
RESTFULL LN
W146S7466
DURHAM DR
S75W13809
BLUHM CT
S75W14530
EASY ST
S75W14520
PILGRIM DR
W140S7648
FREEDOM AV
S75W13863
BLUHM CT
S75W14496
EASY ST
S75W14482
PILGRIM DR
S75W14554
PILGRIM DR
W140S7620
FREEDOM AV
W140S7636
FREEDOM AV
S75W14499
PILGRIM DR
S75W13850
BLUHM CT
S76W14098
MC SHANE DR
S75W13783
BLUHM CT
S75W13913
BLUHM CT
S76W13722
MC SHANE DR
S76W14140
MC SHANE DR
S75W14547
PILGRIM DR
S75W14181
RESTFULL LN
S76W14180
MC SHANE DR
W143S7651
INDIAN TRAIL
S76W14224
MC SHANE DR
S75W14065
RESTFULL LN
S75W14071
RESTFULL LN
W142S7611
CONCORD CT
W143S7625
INDIAN TRAIL
W141S7601
FREEDOM AV
S74W14493
SETTLER WAY
S74W14375
SETTLER WAY
W142S7602
CONCORD CT
W141S7587
FREEDOM AV
S75W14240
RESTFULL LN
S75W14205
RESTFULL LN
W142S7615
CONCORD CT
S75W14202
RESTFULL LN
S75W14088
RESTFULL LN
S75W14132
RESTFULL LN
S74W14433
SETTLER WAY
S75W14054
RESTFULL LN
W143S7644
INDEPENDENCE
S76W14111
INDEPENDENCE
S74W14465
SETTLER WAY
W143S7693
INDEPENDENCE
W143S7667
INDEPENDENCE
S76W14151
INDEPENDENCE
S74W14039
SETTLER WAY
S76W14291
INDEPENDENCE
S76W14177
INDEPENDENCE
S74W14343
SETTLER WAY
S76W14225
INDEPENDENCE
S76W14253
INDEPENDENCE
S74W14303
SETTLER WAY
S74W14071
SETTLER WAY
S74W14255
SETTLER WAY
S74W14235
SETTLER WAY
S74W14199
SETTLER WAY
S74W14163
SETTLER WAY
S74W14137
SETTLER WAY
S74W14091
SETTLER WAY
S77W14233
MC SHANE DR
S77W14255
MC SHANE DRS77W14315
MC SHANE DR
S77W14281
MC SHANE DR
W136S7649
FAIRFIELD DR
W136S7665
FAIRFIELD DR
C
o
n
c
o
r
d
C
t
City of Muskego PP I/I Project
At-Risk Area 3
80 0 80 160 24040
Feet
¯Sanitary Manhole
Sanitary Lateral
Sanitary Main
Storm Main
At Risk Areas
Buildings
Home Inspection
No Contact
Completed
Lateral Only
No Interest
Muskego Parcels
W125S7575
ESSEX CT
S75W12692
COVENTRY LN
S75W12526
COVENTRY LN
W125S7570
COVENTRY LN
S75W12550
COVENTRY LN
W125S7532
STRATFORD CT
S75W12448
STRATFORD CT
W125S7554
COVENTRY LN
S75W12582
COVENTRY LN
W125S7587
ESSEX CT
W125S7524
STRATFORD CT
S75W12640
COVENTRY LN
S75W12606
COVENTRY LN
S75W12674
COVENTRY LN
W125S7586
COVENTRY LN
W125S7605
ESSEX CT
S75W12470
STRATFORD CT
W125S7618
COVENTRY LN
W125S7602
COVENTRY LN
W125S7599
ESSEX CT
S75W12515
COVENTRY LN
W125S7617
COVENTRY LN
S75W12581
COVENTRY LN
S75W12549
COVENTRY LNS75W12605
COVENTRY LN
S72W12403
TESS CORNERS
S75W12637
COVENTRY LN
W125S7634
COVENTRY LNW125S7633
COVENTRY LN
S75W12494
COVENTRY LN
K1556
K1561
K1558
K1559 K1560
K1557
K1553 K1552
K1554
K1555
C o v e n t r y L n
Essex Ct
Stratford Ct
City of Muskego PP I/I Project
At-Risk Area 4
40 0 40 80 12020
Feet ¯Sanitary Manhole
Sanitary Lateral
Sanitary Main
Storm Main
At Risk Areas
Buildings
Home Inspections
No Contact
Completed
Lateral Only
No Interest
Muskego Parcels
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MUSKEGO
Staff Report to Public Works Committee
To: Public Works Committee
From: David Simpson, P.E., City Engineer
Subject: Revision to Chapter 28 of the City of Muskego Municipal Code related to
cross connection prevention.
Date: January 18, 2012
Background Information:
As you will remember from a previous Public Works Committee meeting, the City is
required to implement changes to our municipal code to comply with NR 810 of the
Wisconsin Administrative Code (attached).
The attached ordinance will enact the required changes and allow the City to
complete cross connection inspections that are required by the State.
This change has been reviewed and approved by the City’s attorney and can move
to Common Council for final approval.
Recommendation for Action by Committee:
Recommend approval of changes to section 28.04(17) as presented.
COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF MUSKEGO
ORDINANCE #_____
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 28,
SECTION 28.04 (17),
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO
(Purity of Supply Not To Be Impaired By Cross Connections)
THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGO, W ISCONSIN DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Chapter 28, Section 28.04 (17), of the Municipal Code of the City of
Muskego is hereby amended to read as follows:
(17) PURITY OF SUPPLY NOT TO BE IMPAIRED BY CROSS CONNECTIONS
(a) DEFINITION OF CROSS CONNECTION. A cross connection is defined as any
physical connection or arrangement between two otherwise separate systems, one of
which contains potable water from the City of Muskego’s public water system, and the
other of which contains water from a private source, water of unknown or questionable
safety, or steam, gases, or chemicals, whereby there may be a flow from one system to the
other, with the direction of flow depending on the pressure differential between the two
systems.
(b) UNPROTECTED CROSS CONNECTIONS PROHIBITED. No person, firm, or
corporation may establish or maintain, or permit to be established or maintained, any
unprotected cross connection. Cross connections shall be protected as required in
chapters NR810 and COMM 82, Wisconsin Administrative Code.
(c) INSPECTION. The water utility may inspect, or arrange for an inspection of,
property served by the public water system for cross connections. At its sole discretion, the
water utility may require a person, firm, or corporation who owns, leases, or occupies
property to have their plumbing inspected, at their own expense by a State of Wisconsin
Certified Cross Connection Inspector. The frequency of inspections shall be established by
the water utility in accordance with Wisconsin Administrative Code. Any unprotected cross
connections identified by the inspection shall be promptly corrected. Failure to promptly
correct an unprotected cross connection shall be sufficient cause for the water utility to
discontinue water service to the property, as provided under 28.04(17)(f) of this ordinance.
(d) RIGHT OF ENTRY. Upon presentation of credentials, a representative of the water
utility shall have the right to request entry, at any reasonable time, to a property served by
a connection to the public water system for the purpose of inspecting the property for cross
connections. Refusing entry to such utility representative shall be sufficient cause for the
water utility to discontinue water service to the property, as provided under 28.04(17)(f) of
this ordinance. If entry is refused, a special inspection warrant under Section 66.0119 of
the Wisconsin Statutes, may be obtained.
(e) PROVISION OF REQUESTED INFORMATION. The water utility may request an
owner, lessee, or occupant of property served by a connection to the public water system
to furnish the water utility with pertinent information regarding the piping systems on the
property. Refusing to provide requested information shall be sufficient cause for the water
Ord. #_______ Page 2
utility to discontinue water service to the property, as provided under 28.04(17)(f) of this
ordinance.
(f) DISCONTINUATION OF WATER FOR VIOLATION. The water utility may
discontinue water service to any property wherein any unprotected connection in violation
of this ordinance exists, and take other precautionary measures deemed necessary to
eliminate any danger of contamination of the public water system. Water service may be
discontinued, however, only after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing under
Chapter 68, Wisconsin Statutes, except as provided in 28.04(17)(g) of this ordinance.
Water service to such property shall not be restored until the unprotected cross connection
has been eliminated.
(g) EMERGENCY DISCONTINUANCE. If it is determined by the water utility that an
unprotected cross connection or emergency endangers public health, safety, or welfare,
and requires immediate action, and if a written finding to that effect is filed with the City
Clerk and delivered to the customer's premises, water service may be immediately
discontinued. The customer shall have an opportunity for hearing under Chapter 68,
Wisconsin Statutes, within 10 days of such emergency discontinuance. Water service to
such property shall not be restored until the unprotected cross connection has been
eliminated
SECTION 2: The several sections of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. If
any section or portion thereof shall be declared by a decision of a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, unlawful, or unenforceable, such decision shall apply only to
the specific section or portion thereof directly specified in the decision, and not affect the
validity of all other provisions, sections, or portion thereof of the Ordinance which shall
remain in full force and effect. Any other Ordinance whose terms are in conflict with the
provisions of this Ordinance is hereby repealed as to those terms that conflict.
SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and publication.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF ___ ______ , 2012.
CITY OF MUSKEGO
_______________________________
Kathy Chiaverotti, Mayor
ATTEST: First reading: _________________
_________________________
Clerk-Treasurer
Notice of Newly Enacted Ordinance Published: ____________________
NR 810.15 Cross connections and interconnections. Unprotected cross-connections are
prohibited. Cross-connections shall be protected as required in s. Comm 82.41. Water system
interconnections are prohibited except as provided in sub. (2). In addition the following requirements
shall be met:
(1) CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM. In order to protect the public water supply system, the
water supplier for every municipal water system shall develop and implement a comprehensive cross
connection control program for the elimination of all existing unprotected cross-connections and
prevention of all future un-protected cross connections to the last flowing tap or end-use device. The
program may include providing public education materials in lieu of inspections of low hazard portions of
residential or commercial facilities. Low hazard areas consist of normal kitchen and bathroom fixtures.
The water supplier shall keep a current record of the cross connection control program available for
annual review by the department. The cross connection control program shall include:
(a) A complete description of the program and the administration procedures, including designation
of the inspection or enforcement agency or agencies.
(b) Local authority for implementation of the program, such as ordinance or other governing rule.
(c) A time schedule for public education materials, surveys and follow up surveys of consumer
premises for cross connections including appropriate record keeping. Unless otherwise authorized by the
department, water suppliers for each municipal water system shall cause a survey to be conducted for
every residential service a minimum of once every ten years or on a schedule matching meter
replacement. Public educational materials, when being provided in lieu of low hazard inspections, shall be
provided to the customer no less than every 3 years and with every cross connection survey. Unless a
detailed alternative schedule is included in the cross connection control program and is approved by the
department, water suppliers for each municipal water system shall cause a survey to be conducted for
every industrial, commercial and public authority service a minimum of once every 2 years. Commercial
properties of similar or lesser risk to residential properties may follow the same schedule as residential
properties. Completed survey results shall be maintained by the water supplier until corrections and
follow up surveys have been made.
(d) A complete description of the methods, devices, and assemblies which will be used to protect the
potable water supply. Compliant methods, devices and assemblies are listed in s. Comm 82.41.
(e) Provisions for denial or discontinuance of water service, after reasonable notice, to any premises
where an unprotected cross connection exists or where a survey could not be conducted due to denial.
(f) Submission to the department of a copy of an ordinance establishing a cross connection control
program, an annual report including a total number of all service connections by category, and a report
indicating the number of surveys completed in each category for that year.
(2) INTERCONNECTIONS WITH OTHER ACCEPTABLE WATER SOURCES. Interconnections between the
public water supply system and another source of water are prohibited unless permitted by the department
in individual cases. Approval of the department shall be obtained prior to the interconnection.
History: CR 09-073: cr. Register November 2010 No. 659, eff. 12-1-10.