CCR19880000 DALE W. ARENZ
JOHN P. HAC?.
DONALD S MOLTER. JR~
0 DALE W. ARENZ
DONALD 5 MOLTER. JR~
uw OFFICES OF
ARENZ. MOLTER. MACV Z. RIFFLE, S.C.
ole CLINTON STREET
P.O. BOX ,348
WAUKESHA. WISCONSIN 53187-1348
TELEPHONE ST340
\
AREA CODE 4Y,
.October 6, 1988
Mayor Wayne Salent ine
CITY OF MUSKEG0
Muskego, WI 53150
P. 0. Box 903
Re: Offer to Purchase/City of
Muskego to Kurer-Bushberger
Dear Mayor Salentine:
proposed sale of the sewer plant property to Kurer/Bushberger along with
I am in receipt of a copy of the new Offer to Purchase concerning the
a copy of Attorney Wagner's letter dated October 4, 1988. I am sending a
copy of the same to Tom Renner at Ruekert h Mielke.
Mr. Renner, I ask that you please review the same, especially in regard
to the attachments and the additions in the last sentence of Paragraph
(11) to the Addendum to Offer to Purchase and call me as soon as possible
in this regard.
Mayor, in most respects, the new offer seems to be well drafted and takes
Offer is not totally acceptable, we should send them a formal Counter-
into consideration our concerns. Attorney Wagner requests that if this
Offer. If the City wishes to draft a formal Counter-Offer, I suggest the
following changes be considered:
1. As to Line 8 of the Offer, it refers, apparently, to the same
map we attached to our Counter-Offer. Please confirm that.
However, it does not have the language we added stating that
the City will require that the boundary of the property being
on City property.
sold be no closer than 10 feet from the well which is to remain
2. As to Number (3) of the Addendum, as they, apparently, want to
attach other documents, the wording should be changed to state:
"The City has received the attached documents as to removal of
sludge treatment facilities on said property."
L11 OTFICLS or
ARENZ. MOLTER, MACY 6 RIFFLE. S. C.
Mayor Wayne Salentine -2- October 6, 1988
3. As to Number (4) of the Addendum, I do not understand the second
sentence which they have added. Please review and advise.
4. As to Number (5) of the Addendum, the second sentence they have
added should either be deleted or amended to read as follows:
"If the survey does not show the south property line of the
subject property to be south of the lake and not intersecting
the Buyers would declare the Offer to Purchase to be null and
its shoreline and to be 17 acres more or less, it is likely that
void pursuant to this paragraph." I also think the words,
"and Buyers" should be deleted from the first sentence as the
Cit.y is paying for the survey. '.~
5. As to Number (7) of the Addendum, a sentence is added which
gives the Buyers the right to declare the Offer null and void
unless they get the ingress and egress they want. We better
discuss this.
0 6. As to Number (8) of the Addendum, I do not understand the same.
7. As to Number (11) of the Addendum, the last sentence is new. I
have sent this to Ruekert h Mielke to be reviewed carefully
concerning these matters. We should discuss the same.
I am looking forward to hearing from you concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
I Donald S. Molter, Jr.
DSM/pw
cc: Mr. Thomas R. Renner
-2 -
.-
- - '. .
.
.
I
1.
I
,I:
12345
New Document
12345
i