Loading...
PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE Packet - 12/15/2020CITY OF MUSKEGO PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA 12/15/2020 5:30 PM Muskego City Hall, Council Chambers, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE STATUS OF PROJECTS Discussion update. No formal action may be taken on the following: Great Water Alliance Hillendale Reconstruction UNFINISHED BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: Request for No Parking Signs - Aud Mar Drive, Audrey Court & Ladwig Drive Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive NEW BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE (The following items have been placed on file for staff review. Upon completion of review, staff will submit a supplement detailing options and possible course action to committee members.) COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS SERVICE, PLEASE CONTACT MUSKEGO CITY HALL, (262) 679-4145.Packet Page 1 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works and Safety Committee To: Public Works and Safety Committee From: Scott Kroeger, PE, PLS, Public Works and Development Director Subject: Request for No Parking Signs along Park Drive Date: December 15, 2020 A request has been made to the Public Works and Safety Committee to install No Parking Signs along Park Drive. The parking restrictions would be on one side of the road only. Currently, there are no parking restrictions on Park Drive. I have attached a map for your review. Please remember, once “No Parking” signs go up they affect all the residents on that road. Holidays, graduations, retirements, and similar parties/events could be affected by these signs. I have attached the following information as requested by the committee. The current ROW for Park Drive and rules for building a fence if interested by Bay Breeze. My old memo from November 2019 with no parking request on Michi and Park with regards to the Muskego School Apartment Development Meeting Notes from the public works meeting in November 2019 the committee agreed to defer this issue until the development was complete. Recommendation for Action by the Committee: The Committee should listen to all the discussion and make a recommendation. Again “No Parking” signs go up they affect all people on that road. Holidays, graduations, retirements, and similar parties/events could be affected by these signs. It is important to make sure all residents along Park Drive are aware of these potential parking restrictions. A defined “No Parking” limit needs to be determined. Page 1 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 2 Page 2 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 3 Page 3 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 4 Page 4 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 5 Page 5 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 6 Page 6 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 7 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works and Safety Committee To: Public Works and Safety Committee From: Scott Kroeger, PE, PLS, Public Works and Development Director Subject: Request to look at street parking along Park Drive and Michi Drive by Plan Commission for Muskego School Development Date: November 18, 2019 The City of Muskego Plan Commission asked for the Public Works and Safety Committee to review parking rules along Park Drive and Michi Drive as part of the Muskego School development plan. Please review attached document of Plan Commission Notes. Residents located west and east of this development expressed concerns with parking along Park and Michi Drive at the Plan Commission. Currently, there are no parking restrictions on Park or Michi Drive. I have attached a site plan for your review of the development. Parking break down for the development 40 Garage Stalls (detached) 18 Surface Parking spots (2 handicap) by existing school 18 Surface Parking spots by Row Houses in front of garages 18 Garage Stalls in Row Houses Additional parking to be added at two locations (# of spots to still be determined) Please remember, once “No Parking” signs go up they affect all people on that road not just this new development. Holidays, graduations, retirements, and similar parties/events could be affected by these signs. Recommendation for Action by the Committee: Here is a list of some suggested ideas for the Committee to discuss: 1. Do nothing for now and revisit the parking situation after the development has been constructed and operating. 2. If the decision is to provide some type of “No Parking” signs my suggestion is the following: Park Drive: Provide “No Parking” signs along west side from Harbor Circle to the beginning of the right turn lane. The existing access for the Muskego School off Park Drive is being eliminated. There is no walk way path to the development off of Park Drive. Michi Drive: Provide “No Parking” signs along west side from the north entrance point to the south entrance point of the development. This would allow the residents on the east side of Michi Drive to back out of their Page 7 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 8 residences with less probability of hitting a car parked along the west side of Michi Drive. 3. Other thoughts by the committee? The Committee should listen to all the discussion and make a recommendation. Page 8 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 9 Approved CITY OF MUSKEGO PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 18, 2019 5:00 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER Alderperson Borgman called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Alderperson Madden, Alderperson Borgman, Alderperson Hammel, Scott Kroeger, Director of Public Works and Development, Richard Rens, Police Chief Guests: Jeremiah Johnson, Bob Gelhaus STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was posted in accordance with open meeting laws. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Alderperson Madden made a motion to approve the minutes of September 16, 2019 meeting. Alderperson Hammel seconded. Motion Passed 3 in favor. STATUS OF PROJECTS Discussion update. No formal action may be taken on any of the following: Waukesha Water/Great Water Alliance Director Kroeger stated the City met with the Great Water Alliance representatives on October 23rd, to review the 90% plans. He briefly explained to the audience what this project will entail. Director Kroeger continued stating they will host a Public Information Meeting in Jan or Feb 2020. The project will go to bid in March 2020. The City will have a link and information, including a hotline number for this project on our City website. He continued it will be a two year contract from mid – 2020 through mid – 2022. Director Kroeger stated to plan for detours and closures throughout the next two years. Bay Lane Reconstruction Director Kroeger stated the contractor has a small punch list of items to finish. Some landscaping items will need to be finished/redone in spring. Hillendale Reconstruction Director Kroeger stated since the last Public Information Meeting he has meet with 10-15 residents who had additional questions/concerns. This information was passed along to the consultant. The City is expecting 90% plans in Dec/Jan. He continued that the utility plans will be next, based off of the road plans. The project will go out to bid in Dec 2020. The reconstruction will take place approximately Mar- Nov 2021. Road Program 2019 Upgrade Page 9 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 10 Director Kroeger stated the annual Road Program went very well this year. The City was able to add Hidden Creek Ct, Wentland Dr (T-area), finish the Idle Isle trail and repair an area on Bluhm Dr. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: NEW BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: Request to Review Street Parking along Park Drive and Michi Drive by Plan Commission for Muskego Development Director Kroeger began by reviewing his memo and explaining why the Plan Commission requested this discussion. The Committee briefly talked about a couple of ideas. Alderperson Madden made a motion to table this discussion until after the complex is built. Seconded by Alderperson Hammel. Motion Passed 3 in favor. Request for Pedestrian Warning Sign at the Intersection of Woods Road and Racine Avenue Director Kroeger presented his memo and aerial photos of the intersection. He talked about his discussions with Jeremiah Johnson and the Muskego-Norway School District. Everyone agreed this is a very busy intersection. The agreement is for the City to pay for the regular sign and the MNSD to pay for the solar sign. Mr. Johnson spoke on behalf of the MNSD stating he was very thankful the City stepped up to help and support this request. Waukesha County was not responding to the school’s concerns about adding signage to this intersection. Alderperson Hammel made a motion to approve the Pedestrian Warning Sign as presented. Seconded by Alderperson Madden. Motion Passed 3 in favor. Vision Corner Waiver for Property Located at SE Corner of College Avenue and Gold Drive Director Kroeger presented his memo and photos of the proposed fence. The vision corner requirements would require this fence to be on an angle. The owner has requested a waiver due the large setbacks from the road. He would prefer the fence to be at a right angle. Alderperson Hammel made a motion to approve the Vision Corner Waiver as presented. Seconded by Alderperson Madden. Motion Passed 3 in favor. Tess Corners Drive Speed Limit Reduction Discussion Director Kroeger explained to the Committee that this is an arterial road meant for slightly higher speeds, has a pedestrian path, and a wide right-of-way. The City does not have another parallel road that citizens could use to get across town quickly. He also presented a speed survey that resulted in an average speed of 37.1 MPH. Ald. Borgman stated that all the surrounding roads are 25-30 MPH and will all the twists and turns Tess Corners Drive should now be at a reduced speed because people can travel on Moreland Road if they need to go faster. Chief Rens reiterated some of Director Kroeger’s comments, that this is an arterial road with higher speed limits and he believes it should stay at 35 MPH. He stated most people get a “feel” for how slow/fast to drive on a road that does not have posted speed limits. He mentioned that 85% of people “feel” Tess Corners Drive should actually be 40 MPH. Director Kroeger also explained the possibility of drivers finding quicker, alternative routes on other side roads that are not meant for extra traffic, if the speed limit is reduced. The surrounding roads that are currently 25 MPH, may now find more traffic and speeds closer to 30 MPH. The Committee continued to discuss ideas and speeds of other local roads. Chief Rens made it known, if the Committee chooses to reduce the speed on Tess Corners Drive, it must remain consistent throughout the entire length of the City. Mr. Page 10 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 11 Gelhaus spoke to the Committee stating he is the resident who requested this speed reduction. He said when he does 35 MPH traffic backs up behind him, he struggles to get out of his driveway on a regular basis. He believes the speed study is wrong. He was insistent that traffic is traveling at 40-45 MPH. He also volunteered to survey the neighbors if needed, to get the speed reduced to 30 MPH. Alderperson Borgman made a motion to change the speed limit to 30 MPH on Tess Corners Drive. Seconded by Alderperson Hammel. Motion Passed 2 in favor. Ald. Madden voted against. NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE (The following items have been placed on file for staff review. Upon completion of review, staff will submit a supplement detailing options and possible course of action to committee members.) COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW ADJOURNMENT Alderperson Madden made a motion to adjourn at 5:55 PM. Alderperson Hammel seconded. Motion Passed 3 in favor. Respectfully Submitted, Wendy Fredlund Recording Secretary Page 11 of 11 Request for No Parking Signs - Park Drive Packet Page 12 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works and Safety Committee To: Public Works and Safety Committee From: Scott Kroeger, PE, PLS, Public Works and Development Director Subject: Crowbar Development – Public Improvements Approval Date: December 15, 2020 The City of Muskego has reviewed the Crowbar Development plan set located on Crowbar Drive across from Waters Court. The most recent plan sheet has been attached. The development will have public sanitary sewer. All public infrastructure will be dedicated to the City of Muskego upon completion and acceptance of the project. The City of Muskego has reviewed the plans and given approval for all public infrastructure plans to move forward contingent upon all City of Muskego staff comments being addressed. Recommendation for Action by the Committee: Approve all public infrastructure for the Crowbar Development contingent upon all City of Muskego staff comments being addressed. Page 1 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 13 150°' CROWBAR DEVELOPMENT CITY OF MUSKEGO, WI MUSKEGO, WIPROJECT NO. 20-710-220 CONSULTING ENGINEER: M SQUARED ENGINEERING WISCONSIN OFFICE: W62 N215 WASHINGTON AVE. CEDARBURG, WI 53012 Phone (262) 376-4246 Fax (262) 375-2274 ILLINOIS OFFICE: 230 W. MONROE STREET CHICAGO, IL 60606 Phone (312) 429-4976 Fax (262) 375-2274 DATE: 10/26/2020 INDEX:PREPARED FOR: CROWBAR DEVELOPMENT CROWBAR DR MUSKEGO, WI 53150 SHEET 1: COVER SHEET SHEET 2: NOTES SHEET 3-6: DETAILS SHEET 7: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET 8: SANITARY SEWER - PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 9: GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANVICINITY MAP SHEET OF 91Page 2 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 14 SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 4 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                 20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:DMM 10/26/2020 OF 92 NO T E S LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT 40FT SETBACK LINE ROAD CENTERLINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT RIGHT OF WAY WETLANDS BOUNDARY TREE LINE EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED SANITARY LINE PROPOSED CONTOURS BEARINGS BASED ON THE WISC. STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD"27") SOUTH ZONE VERTICAL DATUM BASED ON NGVD"29" FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED ON 6/11/2020, UPDATED ON 10/22/2020 Page 3 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 15 SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 9 / 2 0 2 0 1 : 5 2 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                 20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:DMM 10/26/2020 OF 93 DE T A I L S Construction Specifications The thickness of the pad shall not be less than 6 inches. Use geotextile fabrics, or high water table. The width of the pad shall not be less than the full width of all points of ingressor egress and in any case shall not be less than 12 feet wide. The length of the pad shall be as required, but not less than 50 feet. Locate construction entrances and exits to limit sediment leaving the site and to steep grades and entrances at curves in public roads. The entrance shall be maintained in a condition that will prevent tracking or flowing if necessary, to improve stability of the foundation in locations subject to seepage provide for maximum utility by all construction vehicles. Avoid entrances which have The aggregate size for construction of the pad shall be 3- to 6-inch clear or washed stone in accordance with WDNR Technical Standard 1057. Place the gravel to the specific grade and dimensions shown on the plans, and smooth it. TYPICAL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT (N.T.S.) AIR RELEASE VALVE MH 2 (N.T.S.) TERMINAL FLUSHING CLEANOUT DETAIL (N.T.S.) 2" CURB STOP. MINNEAPOLIS PATTERN WITH CURB BOX OR APPROVED EQUAL. COUPLING TYPE WITH STATIONARY ROD AND PLAIN LID PLUG VALVE STOP B11-777M OR EQUAL 3" PVC CPLG WITH THREADED PLUG W/ OPERATING NUT R-1861 (SOLID LID) VALVE BOX TOP SECTION W/PLAIN LID VALVE SLEEVE W/ TOP CAP EXTEND BELOW FROST 2" PVC RISER PIPE 30" RCP CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK 1.5' 4' M I N 2" PLUG VALVE 2"X2" TEE 2" PLUG VALVE 2" PLUG VALVE 2" PLUG VALVE2"X2" TEE 2" D.I.2" D.I. DRESSER COUPLING ADJUSTING RING LEAD TO GOOSE NECK (SEE GOOSE NECK DETAIL) AIR/VAC VALVE AIR RELEASE VALVE 72" CONCRETE MANHOLE PIPE WITHIN STRUCTURE TO BE STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTED 2" D.I. EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL R-1661 (SOLID LID) MI N 2 . 5 ' CO V E R GOOSE NECK DESIGN FOR SANITARY MANHOLES IN THE STREET (N.T.S.) NOTE: ALL PIPING WITHIN SANITARY MANHOLES SHALL BE 2" FLANGED DUCTILE IRON PIPE OR OTHER MATERIALS WITH APPROVAL FROM CITY. INLET PROTECTION DETAIL (N.T.S.) DRESSER COUPLING 2" D.I. PLUG NORTH END AIR RELEASE & AIR/VAC Page 4 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 16 SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 5 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                 20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:DMM 10/26/2020 OF 94 DE T A I L S SILT FENCE DETAIL (N.T.S.) EROSION MATTING DETAIL (N.T.S.) Page 5 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 17 SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 5 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                 20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:DMM 10/26/2020 OF 95 DE T A I L S Page 6 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 18 SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 9 / 2 0 2 0 1 : 5 3 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                 20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:DMM 10/26/2020 OF 96 DE T A I L S SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION DETAIL SEWER LATERAL SEWER MAIN C/L WYE CONNECTION FRONT VIEW TOP VIEW NOTES: 1. PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE SAME AS PRESSURE SEWER (IPS DR HDPE). 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET CITY US MUSKEGO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL COMPONENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FITTINGS, LATERALS, AND ALL OTHER COMPONENTS. AIR RELEASE VALVE MH 1 (N.T.S.) PLUG WEST END DRESSER COUPLING 2" D.I. 2" PLUG VALVE 2"X2" CROSS 2" PLUG VALVE 2" PLUG VALVE 2" PLUG VALVE2"X2" CROSS 2" D.I.2" D.I. DRESSER COUPLING ADJUSTING RING LEAD TO GOOSE NECK (SEE GOOSE NECK DETAIL) AIR/VAC VALVE AIR RELEASE VALVE 72" CONCRETE MANHOLE PIPE WITHIN STRUCTURE TO BE STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTED AIR RELEASE & AIR/VAC 2" D.I. EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL R-1661 (SOLID LID) MI N 2 . 5 ' CO V E R NOTE: ALL PIPING WITHIN SANITARY MANHOLES SHALL BE 2" FLANGED DUCTILE IRON PIPE OR OTHER MATERIALS WITH APPROVAL FROM CITY. 2" DI 2" PLUG VALVE Page 7 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 19 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT 40FT SETBACK LINE ROAD CENTERLINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT RIGHT OF WAY WETLANDS BOUNDARY TREE LINE EXISTING CONTOURS SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 9 / 2 0 2 0 1 : 5 0 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY: DMM 10/26/2020 OF 97 OV E R A L L S I T E P L A N PROPOSED BUILDING PAD EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY 00 40'80' 15' WETLAND PROTECTION OFFSET Page 8 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 20 00 40'80' SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 6 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY: DMM 10/26/2020 OF 98 SA N I T A R Y S E W E R P L A N V I E W Page 9 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 21 SHEET CR O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T VERT. SCALE: CHECKED BY: DCB PROJECT NO. REVISIONS REVISED BY:DATE: CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 0 M S Q U A R E D E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D F: \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 - 7 1 0 - 2 2 0 C R O W B A R D E V E L O P M E N T \ C A D \ B A S E \ C R O W B A R D E V EL O P M E N T . D W G D A T E O F P L O T : 10 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 6 P M                             .. . w h e r e e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s m e e t w a t e r q u a l i t y . . . ww w . m s q u a r e d e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m                                                                                 20-710-220 HORIZ. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:DMM 10/26/2020 OF 99 GR A D I N G A N D E R O S I O N C O N T R O L PL A N LEGEND: PROPOSED SILT FENCE GRADING LIMITS EXISTING CONTOURS802 PROPOSED CONTOURS802 888.88 00 40'80' PROPOSED CHECK DAM 15' WETLAND PROTECTION BUFFER PROPOSED TRACKING PAD PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED EROSION MATTING Page 10 of 10 Crowbar Development - Public Improvements Approval Packet Page 22 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works and Safety Committee To: Public Works and Safety Committee From: Scott Kroeger, PE, PLS, Public Works and Development Director Subject: Request for No Parking Signs along Lochcrest Blvd Date: December 15, 2020 A request has been made to the Public Works and Safety Committee to install No Parking Signs along Lochcrest Blvd. The parking restrictions would be on one side of the road only. Currently, there are no parking restrictions on Lochcrest Blvd. Please review the attached letter by the resident who is making the request. I have attached a plat of survey of Lake Access 15 for your review with the resident’s house mapped out as well. Please remember, once “No Parking” signs go up they affect all the residents on that road. Holidays, graduations, retirements, and similar parties/events could be affected by these signs. No Parking Signs would limit the general public from accessing this Lake Access Point. The City of Muskego has made improvements (new signage, landscaping, etc.) to each of the Lake Access Points in the last couple of years. Photo of Lake Access #15 from Lochcrest Blvd. Page 1 of 6 Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd Packet Page 23 Recommendation for Action by the Committee: The Committee should listen to all the discussion and make a recommendation. Again “No Parking” signs go up they affect all people on that road. Holidays, graduations, retirements, and similar parties/events could be affected by these signs. It is important to make sure all residents along Lochcrest Blvd. are aware of these potential parking restrictions. A defined “No Parking” limit needs to be determined. Page 2 of 6 Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd Packet Page 24 Page 3 of 6 Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd Packet Page 25 Page 4 of 6 Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd Packet Page 26 Page 5 of 6 Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd Packet Page 27 Page 6 of 6 Request for No Parking Signs - Lochrest Blvd Packet Page 28