Loading...
PLAN COMMISSION Packet - 5/5/2020 CITY OF MUSKEGO PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA 05/05/2020 6:00 PM Electronic Meeting, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plan Commission of the City of Muskego will be held electronically at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, May 5, 2020, via an online Zoom meeting. This meeting will not be held at Muskego City Hall. This is in efforts to protect the health of the public, City leaders and staff due to the fact that the City of Muskego has declared a sta te of emergency as a result of the COVID-19 virus pandemic. The Public Hearing and Plan Commission meeting will however be available to the public for live streaming via the City of Muskego channel at www.youtube.com . Any comments which the public wishes to make regarding an item on the Public Hearing or Plan Commission agenda may be communicated to the city via email at citizencomments@cityofmuskego.org or via phone at 414-376- 8022. Any email and phone comments for this must be received by 5:30 PM on the date of the meeting. All received comments will be read to the Plan Commission as part of the Public Hearing or agenda item. Interested parties may also observe in the meeting directly by downloading the ZOOM app located at http://zoom.us and utilize this unique ID to join: 886-229-663. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Approval of the minutes of the March 3, 2020 meeting. Approval of the minutes of the April 2, 2020 meeting. PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearing for a renewal of Conditional Use Grant in accordance with Section 14 of the City of Muskego Zoning Ordinance for Payne & Dolan for the purpose of continued mining and processing of sand and gravel and the extension of use of an asphalt plant at the NW corner of Crowbar Road and Janesville Road, in the NE 1/4 and SE 1/4 of Section 13 (Tax Key 2230.996 / W217 S8425 Crowbar Road). CONSENT BUSINESS RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Renewal of a Conditional Use Grant for the purpose of continued mining and processign of sand and gravel, and the extension of use of an asphalt plant for Payne and Dolan at W217 S8425 Crowbar Roadin / Tax Key No. 2230.996. RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Approval of a Second Garden Shed Structure for Lynn Ziarek located at W145 S6625 Tess Corners Drive / Tax Key No. 2165.988. RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Approval of a Mother-In-Law Unit for the Locicero property located at W205 S6617 Tans Drive / Tax Key No. 2181.992.001. Packet Page 1 Plan Commission Agenda 2 5/5/2020 6:00:00 PM RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Approval of a Metal Accessory Structure for Todd Turowski located at W185 S9530 Parker Drive / Tax Key No. 2270.995.013. RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Approval of a second Accessory Structure for Anthony Vela & Susan Ramano located at W179 S6920 Muskego Drive / Tax Key No. 2176.033. NEW BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan, Certified Survey Map and Condominium Plat for Home Path Financial located at S76 W17501 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2196.958.004. RESOLUTION PC 022-2020 Approval of a Certified Survey Map near St. Leonards Drive for Home Path Financial located at S76 W17501 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2196.958.004. PC 030-2020 Conceptual Review for Whorley Storage located on a vacant property along Racine Avenue / Tax Key No. 2180.994.004. RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for Interstate Partners located at S64 W15591 Commerce Ce nter Parkway / Tax Key No. 2116.997.008. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE -STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE -STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS SERVICE, CONTACT MUSKEGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, (262) 679 -4136. Packet Page 2 UNAPPROVED CITY OF MUSKEGO PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES 03/03/2020 6:00 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Chiaverotti, Alderman Kubacki Commissioners Oliver, Bartlett, Buckmaster, Graf, Associate Planner Fahl. Absent: Commissioner Jacques, Planner Trzebiatowski. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting laws. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Approval of the minutes from the February 4, 2020 meeting. Commissioner Bartlett made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 4, 2019 meeting. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CONSENT BUSINESS RESOLUTION PC 008-2020 Approval of an Annual Review for Schaefer Snowplowing and Grading LLC located at W195 S9773 Racine Ave. / Tax Key No. 2274.998. RESOLUTION PC 009-2020 Approval of a Bi-Annual Review for outdoor storage for Ralph W. Raush at the property located at S83 W18550 Saturn Drive / Tax Key No. 2223.003. RESOLUTION PC 010-2020 Approval of a Bi-Annual Review for the RD Meyer Mini Storage property located at W145 S6550 Tess Corners Drive / Tax Key No. 2165.998.012. RESOLUTION PC 011-2020 Approval of a Bi-Annual Review for the George Alex property located at S98 W12712 Loomis Drive / Tax Key No. 2257.984.001. RESOLUTION PC 012-2020 Approval of a review six months after occupancy for Pinnacle Peak located at W182 S8320 Pioneer Drive / Tax Key No. 2223.999. RESOLUTION PC 013-2020 Approval of the sale of Fireworks for American Fireworks and Page 1 of 5 Approval of the minutes of the March 3, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 3 Plan Commission Minutes 2 3/3/2020 6:00:00 PM Novelties LLC at the Jetz Fuel property located at S69 W15461 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2167.995.011. Alderman Kubacki asked to pull PC 006-2020 and PC 007-2020 from consent. Commissioner Buckmaster made a motion to approve the consent business engross. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion to approve PC 008-2020, 009-2020, 010-2020, 011- 2020, 012-2020, 013-2020 passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION PC 006-2020 Approval of an Annual Review for Frey Auto located at S106 W16301 Loomis Road / Tax Key No. 2293.996.002. Alderman Kubacki made a motion to approve Resolution PC 006-2020. Commissioner Oliver seconded. Alderman Kubacki explained that Frey Auto continually has bad inspections and then is sent a letter and cleans up the site for the follow-up inspection. Is there anything else that can be done to ensure that site inspections are correct at the first inspection? If nothing is done it will be the same discussion next time. Commissioner Graf said that there is no progressiveness associated with the inspection process and asked if there should be. Commissioner Buckmaster asked if the Plan Commission has the authority to set penalties for habitual offenders. The Plan Commission discussed additional inspections. Mayor Chiaverotti will discuss with legal counsel and have answers for the next meeting. Alderman Kubacki made a motion to amend Resolution PC 006-2020 to have a 6-month review. Commissioner Graf seconded. Resolution amended 5-1 with Commissioner Bartlett voting nay. Motion to approve Amended Resolution 006-2020 was approved 5-1 with Commissioner Graf voting Bartlett. RESOLUTION PC 007-2020 Approval of an Annual Review for the Durham Hill Auto property located at S98 W12608 Loomis Drive / Tax Key No. 2257.982.002. Alderman Kubacki made a motion to approve Resolution 007-2020. Commissioner Graf seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 005-2020 Approval of an Annual Review for the Loomis Court LLC. property formerly known as the George Alex / Robert Jacob property located at S98 W12575 Loomis Court & W125 S9912 North Cape Road / Tax Key No. 2257.973.001. Associate Planner Fahl provided an overview of the annual review. An unapproved sign was located on the site for the initial and follow-up inspection. After discussion with the property owner the sign was removed and the site is now in compliance. Commissioner Buckmaster made a motion to approve Resolution PC 005-2020. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 014-2020 Recommendation to Common Council to Rezone a property from B-2 Local Service District to B-4 Highway Business District for D&K Seasonal Services Page 2 of 5 Approval of the minutes of the March 3, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 4 Plan Commission Minutes 3 3/3/2020 6:00:00 PM located at S80 W19025 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2225.984. Associate Planner Fahl provided an overview of the request for rezoning. The site is currently zoned B-2 Local Service District but is requesting a change to B-4 Highway Business to allow for outdoor sales of mulch, salt and other landscaping products. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Commercial so a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is not needed. A public hearing was held in front of the Common Council with a concern regarding drainage but further investigation revealed that drainage would likely not go that direction. Other concerns included property values of neighboring properties and plantings along Janesville Road. These concerns would be reviewed further during the Business, Site and Operations Plan approval process. Alderman Kubacki and Commissioner Oliver reiterated that site drainage would not affect the neighboring properties, but would go toward the back of the property where a We Energies easement is located and wouldn’t affect any businesses. Commissioner Bartlett confirmed that when the applicant returns with a Building, Site and Operations Plan proposal the landscaping and site improvements would be reviewed. Alderman Kubacki made a motion to approve Resolution PC 014-2020. Commissioner Bartlett seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 015-2020 Approval of a Metal Accessory Structure for Steve Stack located at S63 W15425 College Avenue / Tax Key No. 2166.997.005. Associate Planner Fahl provided a summary of the metal accessory structure. The metal 33’ x 64’ foot accessory structure does not have the same materials as the house, but will be painted to match the house. Windows, doors, a copula and wainscoting will provide a residential feel rather than a standard metal accessory structure. All of the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code will be met. Alderman Kubacki made a motion to approve Resolution PC 015-2020. Commissioner Bartlett seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 016-2020 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for Alliance Construction & Design Inc. located at S73 W16555 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2198.978. Associate Planner Fahl provided an overview of the project. A smaller project for this site was previously approved last year for an addition. The submittal now is to remove the entire building except the easternmost car wash bay and rebuild the building. The wall closest to the east property line will be moved to meet the ten-foot offset requirement. Architecturally, the building will be EIFS, stone veneer and glass. The eastern wall that will be moved is shown as a painted block wall but it would be changed to match the remainder of the building. The masonry calculations submitted do not meet the 50 percent as required by the design guide. Prior to issuance of building permits the plans must show at least 50 percent masonry. The roof materials are noted as a metal or shingle roof and staff is looking for a preference by the Plan Commission. All mechanicals will need additional landscaping screening. The number of parking stalls meet the code requirements. The applicant is seeking a waiver for parking stall size. The applicant is also seeking a waiver for the offset of the parking area toward the south to be three feet to accommodate a properly sized drive aisle. A new solid vinyl fence will be installed on this property line to assist with any light or noise from the new building. Curb and gutter is Page 3 of 5 Approval of the minutes of the March 3, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 5 Plan Commission Minutes 4 3/3/2020 6:00:00 PM shown on the plan throughout the site. The vacuum station is within a WEPCO easement and permission will be needed from the utility to locate the vacuum station as shown. A garbage enclosure is shown with fencing materials to match the solid fence along the southern side of the property. Additional landscaping will also be needed along the front of the building. The existing monument sign will be removed. Hours will be the same as previously approved of 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM with the car wash hours set at 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Alderman Kubacki asked for clarification on moving the eastern wall of the building. Associate Planner Fahl explained that the applicant has stated they can remove the wall while using the same footings to reconstruct the wall to meet the ten-foot offset requirement. Commissioner Buckmaster wanted to point out that the two tenants that have not been identified that the cross access easement had been removed from this site years ago and he would not be in favor of recommissioning the cross access with the waivers being requested. Commissioner Bartlett stated that he has no preference as for the roof materials being either standing seam metal or asphalt shingles. Commissioner Bartlett also wanted clarification that the eastern wall will need to match the remainder of the building. Associate Planner Fahl confirmed that the eastern wall will need to match and is stated in the resolution. Mayor Chiaverotti also wanted to point out that this building is a big improvement for the site. Commissioner Bartlett made a motion to approve Resolution PC 016-2020. Commissioner Buckmaster seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 017-2020 Recommendation to Common Council to amend Chapter 400 of the Municipal Code Sections 400-15, 400-17, 400-29, 400-31, 400-42, 400-62, 400-76, 400-159, 400-166, 400-181, 400-190, 400-193, 400-216. Associate Planner Fahl provided a synopsis of the Zoning Code amendments including the following: - Allowing for the reuse of existing barns for event/wedding venues as a Conditional Use Grant. - Allowing scoreboards with design flexibility with Plan Commission approval including sponsorship space. - Allowing goats and sheep as livestock with clarification of how the number of livestock/fowl are counted. - Remove hobby farms from the code - Amend who reviews variances of new houses in relation to groundwater. - Reducing the required parking stall size to 9’ x 18’ - Amend who approves more than one residence on a lot - Adding section of code to ensure all restrictions are followed on plats - Addressing lights in windows of businesses to mimic the lighting standards - Removed inaccurate text in the monument sign definition - Amended the process of the appointed aldermanic representative to match state statutes. Page 4 of 5 Approval of the minutes of the March 3, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 6 Plan Commission Minutes 5 3/3/2020 6:00:00 PM Commissioner Buckmaster questions why the City is changing the way the aldermanic representative is changing to being appointed by the Mayor rather than the Council. Mayor Chiaverotti stated that this is to match the state statutes. Commissioner Bartlett asked about the high ground water table being changed to be in front of the Public Works & Safety Committee. Mayor Chiaverotti responded that the groundwater is an engineering aspect. Associate Planner Fahl added that every house is required to have a groundwater test completed and results of that test is reviewed by the engineering staff. This amendment applies to any variance to the building being closer to the groundwater. Alderman Kubacki added a comment from the Public Hearing and adding a table for the number of livestock. Associate Planner Fahl explained that the City of Muskego ordinance is simplified as livestock rather than many different categories and is explained in the paragraph being added so a table most likely would not be needed. Alderman Kubacki made a motion to approve Resolution PC 017-2020. Commissioner Bartlett seconded. Motion passed unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS April 2020 Plan Commission Meeting Date The April Plan Commission will be held on Thursday, April 2, 2020 to accommodate elections. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Bartlett made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Oliver seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Aaron Fahl Associate Planner Page 5 of 5 Approval of the minutes of the March 3, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 7 UNAPPROVED CITY OF MUSKEGO PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES 04/02/2020 6:00 PM Online Meeting This meeting will not be held at Muskego City Hall. This is in efforts to protect the health of the public, City leaders and staff due to the fact that the City of Muskego has declared a state of emergency as a result of the COVID-19 virus pandemic. The Plan Commission meeting will however be available to the public for live streaming via the City of Muskego channel at www.youtube.com. Any comments which the public wishes to make regarding an item on the Plan Commission agenda may be communicated to the city via email at citizencomments@cityofmuskego.org and they be directed to the Mayor and members of the Plan Commission. Any email comments for the Plan Commission must be received by 5:30 PM on the date of the meeting. Interested parties may also participate in the meeting directly by downloading the ZOOM app located at http://zoom.us and utilize this unique ID to join: 459-812-527. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Chiaverotti, Alderman Kubacki Commissioners Oliver, Bartlett, Graf, Jacques, Planner Trzebiatowski. Absent: Commissioner Buckmaster. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting laws. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES CONSENT BUSINESS RESOLUTION PC 019-2020 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for Luckys at the Lodge located at S74 W17096 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2198.984.013. RESOLUTION PC 020-2020 Approval of a Two-Lot Certified Survey Map for Brian and Gail James located at W150 S8234 Harvest Court / Tax Key No. 2214.996.019. Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve the consent business engross. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion to approve passed unanimously. Page 1 of 4 Approval of the minutes of the April 2, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2 4/2/2020 6:00:00 PM NEW BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION PC 023-2020 Recommendation to Common Council to Rezone a property from A-1 Agricultural District to RC-1- Country Residence District for PEGARL LLP. along Crowbar Drive / Tax Key No. 2283.999.004. Planner Trzebiatowski provided an explanation of the process of this rezoning being reviewed by the Plan Commission prior to the Common Council since to the public hearing was cancelled due to unforeseen circumstances. The public hearing will be rescheduled for May and if there are any comments it will be brought back to the Plan Commission. However, having the Plan Commission review the rezoning petition on schedule would keep the rezoning process moving forward. The submittal shows a land division that would be applied for if the rezoning is approved. The rezoning does meet the density of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve Resolution PC 023-2020. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 024-2020 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment and Recommendation to Common Council for a Zoning Amendment to PD-42 for the Will Rose Apartments located along Janesville Road / Tax Key Nos. 2198.160.001, 2198.160.002, 2198.160.003 and 2198.160.004. Planner Trzebiatowski provided an overview of the project. The applicant has previously gone through a non-substantial change review in order to adjust the number of residential units in the two buildings from 50 and 40 to 51 and 39 residential units keeping the total number of residential units consistent. Construction for the 51 unit building is under construction and they are asking for an increase in units in the second building from 39 to 45 residential units. The additional units will increase the building footprint slightly and then the conversion of two-bedroom units to one-bedroom units will provide the space for the additional one-bedroom units. The second aspect of the rezoning is to reduce the building setback from 40 feet to 30 feet to match the first building. This also allows area for both the indoor and outdoor parking. Originally the Planned Development zoning allowed for 90 units without utilizing any of the ten percent density bonus as allowed under the Planned Development Zoning Districts. The request is for a seven percent density bonus, not the full ten percent bonus that could be requested. The changes to the second building are very small in the overall plan as requested as an amendment to the Building, Site and Operation Plan amendment. Architecturally, the changes will match the architecture of the first building. Mayor Chiaverotti clarified that the Council looks at the unit changes and the increase in density and the setbacks. The Plan Commission reviews the overall building appearance. Confirmed by Planner Trzebiatowski. Commissioner Oliver says that six additional one-bedroom units will conceivably have two people living in the units and with an additional 10-foot setback there will be additional parking needed. Planner Trzebiatowski explained that they will be adding several underground parking stalls along with more surface parking stalls with slightly moving the building. Overall the ratio of parking to residential units will increase from 2.2 to 2.28 parking stalls per unit. Page 2 of 4 Approval of the minutes of the April 2, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 9 Plan Commission Minutes 3 4/2/2020 6:00:00 PM Commissioner Oliver asked about guest parking. Planner Trzebiatowski explained the documentation that was submitted compared to their other projects, which shows the development in Muskego has more parking per unit than what their other developments have needed. Commissioner Graf asked what is meant by a bonus. Planner Trzebiatowski explained that a bonus is allowed by Code for Planned Development Districts and the City will look at the overall benefit of the unique project. In traditional zoning 40 units per building wouldn’t be allowed, but this is a unique project and the City will look at will this project benefit the City as a whole and is truly discretionary by the Council. Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve Resolution PC 024-2020. Commissioner Graf seconded. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 025-2020 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan for a Two- Family Residential Structure located on Lot 16 of Northfield Green Subdivision / Tax Key No. 2172.026. Planner Trzebiatowski provided an overview of the condominium development near Moorland Road. The architectural review is based on the Moorland Road South Design Guide with Prairie/Craftsman style architecture and the masonry requirements. Staff reviewed this building with the past buildings for masonry percentage and character. It was found that comparing this proposal to previous buildings that this building has more character and masonry than the past buildings. Staff also found that additional landscaping is needed in the rear of the site as it backs up to and is highly visible from Janesville Road. Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve Resolution PC 025-2020. Commissioner Oliver seconded. Motion passed unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS Annual Review Discussion Discussion of further restrictions/penalties for habitual offenders of Building, Site and Operations Plans Annual Reviews. Planner Trzebiatowski began the discussion with an overview of mechanisms to keep violators more accountable year round whether it be more reviews in front of the Plan Commission or random inspections that may result in citations to ensure that habitual offences will cease. This could be based on a direction by the Plan Commission. Mayor Chiaverotti mentioned that the teeth will be in fines and this is what the Plan Commission has been asking for. Commissioner Oliver agrees that quarterly or semi-annual reviews with a penalty will make the owners more accountable to the rules they are supposed to be following. Alderman Kubacki is also in favor of periodic reviews for repeat offenders. Planner Trzebiatowski explained that this doesn’t have to be formal Resolution, but a direction provided by Plan Commission. This is only up for discussion due to chronic violators of the Annual Reviews. The idea would be that if we inspect the property of habitual offenders and everything looks good a follow-up inspection wouldn’t be needed until the following year. Page 3 of 4 Approval of the minutes of the April 2, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 10 Plan Commission Minutes 4 4/2/2020 6:00:00 PM Commissioner Jacques is in favor. Planner Trzebiatowski asked for a duration of the periodic reviews. Commissioners agreed quarterly and then if it looks good the whole time the following year would move to semi- annual. Planner Trzebiatowski asked if violators should be cited immediately. Commissioners agreed they should be cited right away. Planner Trzebiatowski then questioned when we start the new inspection policy. To avoid any surprises and to be fair a letter will be sent letting all annual reviews explaining the new policy. Then start right away or during the next cycle of annual reviews. Commissioner Graf agreed advanced warning of a more rigid inspection. Commissioners agreed inspections to start right away. Mayor Chiaverotti would like a motion to make sure everyone is clear. Commissioner Bartlett asked for motion to be amended to clarify for inspections to only include those that have had past violations. Commissioner Oliver clarified that this is not a warning letter, but an acknowledgement letter of what the process will be moving forward and habitual offenders will be fined. Alderman Kubacki makes a motion to start quarterly reviews with fines for noncompliance for properties that have violations from the past yearly review. Commissioner Jacques seconded. Motion amended to include the process will start right away on a quarterly basis with fines for offenders after an initial letter is sent to all yearly reviews notifying them of the policy change but will only apply to habitual violators. Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Jaques made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Graf seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Aaron Fahl Associate Planner Page 4 of 4 Approval of the minutes of the April 2, 2020 meeting. Packet Page 11 CITY OF MUSKEGO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plan Commission of the City of Muskego will hold a Public Hearing at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, May 5, 2020, via an online Zoom meeting. This meeting will not be held at Muskego City Hall. This is in efforts to protect the health of the public, City leaders and staff due to the fact that the City of Muskego has declared a state of emergency as a result of the COVID-19 virus pandemic. The Public Hearing and Plan Commission meeting will however be available to the public for live streaming via the City of Muskego channel at www.youtube.com . Any Public Hearing comments which the public wish to make relating to this Public Hearing may be communicated to the city via email at citizencomments@cityofmuskego.org or via phone at 414-376-8022. Any email and phone comments for this Public Hearing must be received by 5:30 PM on the date of the meeting. All received comments will be read to the Plan Commission as part of the Public Hearing. Interested parties may also observe in the meeting directly by downloading the ZOOM app located at http://zoom.us and utilize this unique ID to join: 886-229-663. The Public Hearing is to consider the following: Upon the petition of Payne & Dolan Company shall the following described land as addressed as W217 S8425 Crowbar Road be granted a renewal of Conditional Use in accordance with Article XIV of Chapter 400 the Muskego Municipal Code for the purpose of continued mining and processing sand and gravel, extension of the accessory use (asphalt plant) located on the NW corner of Crowbar Road and Janesville Road (CTH L). A parcel of land located in the NE 1/4 and SE 1/4 of Section 13, T5N, R19E, City of Muskego, Waukesha County, Wisconsin; and a parcel of land located in the NW 1/4 and SW 1/4 of Section 18, T5N, R20E, City of Muskego, Waukesha County, Wisconsin; and, a parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 7, T5N, R20E, City of Muskego, Waukesha County, Wisconsin, as described in vol. 1010, page 297 of Deeds. Detailed descriptions are available for public inspection at the Planning Division office. All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard per the requirements noted above. Plan Commission City of Muskego Publish in the Muskego/Waukesha NOW Newspaper on April 15, 2020 and April 22, 2020. Dated this 9th day of April, 2020. NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING AND GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. NOTICE "Please note that, upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact the Planning Division at City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, (262) 679-4136." Page 1 of 1 Public Hearing Packet Page 12 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 018-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST:Renewal of a Conditional Use Grant for the purpose of continued mining and processing of sand and gravel and the extension of use of an asphalt plant Crowbar Road / Janesville Road NE ¼ and SE ¼ of Section 13 PETITIONER:Payne & Dolan INTRODUCED:April 2, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 018-2020 Petitioner seeks approval of the required annual review for continued mining and processing of sand and gravel and the extension of use of an asphalt plant. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 018-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan indicates the area should be used for landfill and extractive land use. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The M-3, Landfill & Extractive District, allows extractive operations by conditional use grant. A CUG was previously approved for the extractive operations and asphalt plant. An annual review is required as a condition of approval. Park and Conservation Plan No parks are proposed in the area. High Conservation Priority is along Crowbar Road, specifically as a view corridor. The current extractive operations are far removed from this area. P & D has continuously improved this area of their site through restoration, slope stabilization, and plantings. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Street System Plan: The Street System Plan indicates Crowbar Road to be a 100’ ultimate right-of-way. No dedication is required at this time. Utility Service Areas: The property is served by private sewer and private water. Page 1 of 6 RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Packet Page 13 DISCUSSION PC 018-2020 A site inspection was recently completed and revealed the site to be well maintained. The site is paved where product is picked up. Erosion control practices appear to be followed; no materials are tracked off site. The equipment on site appears well maintained. Payne & Dolan does not have a schedule for 2020 night-time operations and trucking at this time. When night operations are scheduled, past notification practices will be followed. This includes sending letters regarding their evening operations to affected property owners, accompanied by a phone number for complaints. They also notice the City of these operations. There were no complaints received by the Community Development Department last year regarding night trucking. A Reclamation Plan was submitted and approved in 2002 as per Chapter 237 of the Muskego Ordinance. This is reflected in the Resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 018-2020 Approval of Resolution # PC 018-2020 Page 2 of 6 RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Packet Page 14 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI09501,900 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 018-2020 Payne & DolanW217 S8425 Crowbar Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 3/19/2020 Page 3 of 6 RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Packet Page 15 RESOLUTION #P.C. 018-2020 APPROVAL FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE PERMIT FOR THE CONDITONAL USE GRANT #37 AND THE APPROVAL FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE ASPHALT PLANT ON CROWBAR ROAD FOR PAYNE & DOLAN LOCATED IN THE NE AND SE ¼ OF SECTION 13 WHEREAS, The Plan Commission of the City of Muskego has received a petition for the renewal of Conditional Use Grant #37, held by Payne & Dolan Company for an extractive permit, and WHEREAS, This request also includes renewal for the operation of the asphalt plant, and WHEREAS, All fees have been paid and the public hearing will be held before the Plan Commission on May 5, 2020, and WHEREAS, There is an existing $317,000 bond for site restoration on file with the City, and WHEREAS, A Reclamation Plan was approved by the Plan Commission on August 20, 2002 as per Resolution #P.C. 113-2002, and WHEREAS, Per the conditional use, the petitioner will self-regulate the monitoring of trucking and provide neighbors with information of contact personnel to resolve potential disputes, and WHEREAS, This site is classified as an existing mine as defined by Chapter 237 of the Muskego Municipal Code and NR135 of the State of Wisconsin Natural Resources Code, and as such received an automatic permit for operation from the Wisconsin DNR. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission of the City of Muskego does hereby approve the renewal of the extraction permit for the Conditional Use Grant #37 and the approval for the renewal of the permit for continued operation of the asphalt plant on Crowbar Road. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 4 of 6 RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Packet Page 16 Page 5 of 6 RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Packet Page 17 Page 6 of 6 RESOLUTION PC 018-2020 Packet Page 18 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 026-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Second Garden Shed Structure W145 S6625 Tess Corners Drive / Tax Key No. 2165.988 NE ¼ of Section 2 PETITIONER: Lynn Ziarek INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 026-2020 The petitioner proposes to install a 120 square foot garden shed on her property near the large garden on site. This building will be the second accessory structure (garden shed) on this lot. Plans are attached for your review. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 026-2020 Comprehensive Plan:The 2020 Plan depicts the area for medium density residential land use. The proposal for this residential outbuilding is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is predominantly zoned RS-1 –Suburban Residence District. Accessory structures totaling 1,301 square feet are permitted on the subject property. The current proposal measures 120 square feet in area. There are two other accessory structures (660 and 80 SF) that exist on the lot. The grand total of all accessory structure square footage with the proposed accessory structure equals 860 square feet. The proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 026-2020 The Zoning Code requirements state that Planning Commission approval is needed for more than one garden shed on a lot when it is being used for residential purposes. Plan Commission approvals are being sought since there is already another garden shed on this lot. The architectural requirements state that the accessory structure should have similar materials and colors as the principal residence. The building is proposed to be clad with siding and shingles, both of which will be similar colors as the home. Said proposal does meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures. The petitioner has stated that the newly proposed building will be used for personal storage/uses. The Resolution states the following items: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building cannot be used for the operations of any business activities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the colors of the proposed building must be similar to the colors of the home. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 026-2020 Approval of Resolution #PC 026-2020 Page 1 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 19 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0150300 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 026-2020 Lynn ZiarekW145 S6625 Tess Corners Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 4/20/2020 Page 2 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 20 RESOLUTION #P.C. 026-2020 APPROVAL OF AN ADDITIONAL GARDEN SHED FOR THE ZIAREK PROPERTY LOCATED AT (W145 S6625 TESS CORNERS DRIVE / TAX KEY NO. 2165.988) WHEREAS, A site plan and building drawings were submitted to construct a 120 square foot garden shed on the property located at W45 S6625 Tess Corners Drive (Tax Key No. 2165.988), and WHEREAS, The property is zoned RS-1 Suburban Residence District, and whereas said structure is a permitted accessory use and subject to Plan Commission review due to more than one garden shed on the lot, and WHEREAS, Two accessory structures (740 SF) and a home residence currently reside on the property, and WHEREAS, The combined total of the three (3) outbuildings (two existing and one proposed) will be 860 square feet, which is within the allowed limit, and WHEREAS, The total square footage for accessory structures on this property is limited to 1,301 square feet, and said proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, The accessory structure will be used for personal storage only, and WHEREAS, The proposed height is approximately 9’2” feet, as measured by code, which is allowed in said zoning district due to the proposed location on the accessory structure, and WHEREAS, The structure is proposed to be clad with siding and shingles, both of which will be similar to the house, and said proposal does meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of a 120 square foot garden shed for the Ziarek property located at W45 S6625 Tess Corners Drive (Tax Key No. 2165.988). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The colors of the proposed building must be similar to the colors of the home. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The building cannot be used for the operations of any business activities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the terms of this resolution and the approved site plans shall result in the issuance of fines of $100 per day per violation, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 3 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 21 Page 4 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 22 Page 5 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 23 Page 6 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 24 Page 7 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 026-2020 Packet Page 25 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 027-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Approval of a Mother-in-Law/Family Unit W205 S6617 Tans Drive / Tax Key No. 2181.992.001 NE ¼ of Section 6 PETITIONER: Jeff Baudry for Rosario and Franchesca Locicero INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 027-2020 The petitioner is proposing to construct a mother-in-law/family unit for the owners within the basement of an existing residence. Mother-in-law/family units are allowed as a permitted accessory use in residential zonings subject to certain conditions. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 027-2020 As stated, mother-in-law/family units are allowed as a permitted accessory use in residential zonings subject to the following conditions: Mother-in-Law/Family Units: Any portion of a single family residence, intended to be occupied by a resident(s) related through blood, marriage or adoption to a host residence occupant, being no greater than 800 square feet in size, that has an independent wing or area that is self-supporting in terms of livable needs (i.e. unit includes a kitchen, bath, den and bedroom), but is dependent on utility infrastructure of the primary residence. Access to this wing or area may be obtained via one door to the outside and a second non-lockable door or passage way to the main portion of the host residence. Access is permitted to a garage area having no service door. All such requests are subject to building, site, and operational plan approval of the Plan Commission following written notice being distributed by the Plan Commission to neighboring property owners within 100 feet of the subject property. The petitioned mother-in-law/family unit has been identified that it will be used by related persons to the family, and shows that it will be self-supporting in livable needs and will have a passage to the main residence and a door directly to the outside. The area defined by the petitioner as the mother-in-law/family unit is 798 square feet in size. The proposal meets all of the code requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 027-2020 Approval of Resolution # PC 027-2020 Page 1 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 26 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0180360 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 027-2020 Rosario LociceroW205 S6617 Tans Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 4/21/2020 Page 2 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 27 RESOLUTION #P.C. 027-2020 APPROVAL OF A MOTHER-IN-LAW/FAMILY UNIT FOR THE LOCICERO PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NE ¼ OF SECTION 6 (TAX KEY NO. 2181.992.001 / W205 S6617 TANS DRIVE) WHEREAS, A petition for a mother-in-law/family unit was submitted by Jeff Baudry on behalf of Rosario and Franchesca Locicero for the property located in the NE ¼ of Section 6 (Tax Key No. 2181.992.001 / W205 S6617 Tans Drive), and WHEREAS, Said property is zoned RC-2 Country Residence District where a mother-in- law/family unit is allowed as a permitted accessory use as long as the following objectives are met: 1. Must be occupied by a resident(s) related through blood, marriage or adoption to a host residence occupant. 2. Must be no greater than 800 square feet in size. 3. Must have an independent wing or area that is self-supporting in terms of livable needs (i.e. unit includes a kitchen, bath, den and bedroom), but is dependent on utility infrastructure of the primary residence. Access to this wing or area may be obtained via one door to the outside and a second non-lockable door or passage way to the main portion of the host residence. Access is permitted to a garage area having no service door. 4. Subject to Plan Commission approval with written notice to residents within 100 feet of the property, and WHEREAS, The petitioned mother-in-law/family unit shows that it will be used by related persons to the family, will be self-supporting in livable needs and will have a passage to the main residence and a separate door to the outside, and WHEREAS, The petitioned mother-in-law/family unit is proposed to be 798 square feet in size and will be located in the basement of the existing residence, and WHEREAS, All neighbors within 100 feet have been notified as required. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of the mother-in- law/family unit for the Locicero residence located in the NE ¼ of Section 6 (Tax Key No. 2181.992.001 / W205 S6617 Tans Drive). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The mother-in-law/family unit must be used by related persons to the family, must be self-supporting in livable needs, must have a non-lockable passage to the main residence and a door to the outside, and cannot exceed 800 square feet. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of the mother-in-law/family unit at 798 square feet. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 3 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 28 Page 4 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 29 Page 5 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 30 Page 6 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 31 Page 7 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 32 Page 8 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 33 Page 9 of 9 RESOLUTION PC 027-2020 Packet Page 34 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 028-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Metal Accessory Structure Tax Key No. 2270.995.013 / W185 S9530 Parker Drive NW ¼ of Section 28 PETITIONER: Zac Muther on behalf of Todd Turowski INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 028-2020 The petitioner proposes to construct a 42’ x 64’ accessory structure (totaling 2,688 square feet) on his 5.13 acre lot. The applicant is proposing an accessory structure with exterior materials being metal roof and walls with colors to match the house. Since the roof and wall materials do not match the home Plan Commission approvals are required. Plans are attached for your review. Plan Commission may waive the architectural requirements for accessory structures when any of the following are met: 1. The structure is screened from view, 2. The principal structure is composed of materials, colors, or styles that are inappropriate in their applications to an accessory structure, 3. The Plan Commission finds other circumstances to be present which would result in no undue harm to the property or its surroundings, 4. When the area is found not to be predominately residential. Plan Commission may approve the materials as submitted, or require modifications prior to release of building permits. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 028-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the area for rural density residential land use. The proposal for this residential outbuilding is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned RC-1 Country Residence District. Accessory structures totaling up to 4,468 square feet are permitted on the subject property. The proposal measures 2,688 square feet in area. The proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 028-2020 The architectural requirements state that the accessory structure should have similar materials and colors as the principal residence. Planning Commission approval is being sought due to this concern. The petitioner is proposing a steel sided and steel roofed structure. The steel siding is proposed to be a beige color match the home with the first three feet being a darker beige wainscoting colored to match the trim. The trim will also be painted to match the existing house. The roof and soffits will all be similar to the roof of the home, per the owner. This building is setback over 690 feet from the road. The proposed building location will be in the rear yard behind the garage. The building drawings show one-foot overhangs that match the house. The resolution states Page 1 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 35 that the depth of the over hangs on all sides of the building must at least be equal to those on the main home. The building contains two overhead doors, a service door along with seven windows. The proposed height of the building is approximately 20 feet to the midpoint and that is within the allowed height of 30 feet due to the size of the property. The Resolution states the following items: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building and lot cannot be used for the operations of any business activities or for business storage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the floor of the entire building must be concrete or asphalt, unless a specific portion is only to be used by animals. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The depth of the over hangs on all sides of the building must at least be equal to those on the main home. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 028-2020 Approval of Resolution #PC 028-2020, finding that there will be no undue harm to the surrounding properties, due to the distance from the roadway, due to the area being rural in character. Page 2 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 36 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0230460 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 028-2020 Todd & Wendy TurowskiW185 S9530 Parker Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 4/21/2020 Page 3 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 37 RESOLUTION #P.C. 028-2020 APPROVAL OF A METAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR THE TUROWSKI PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 28 (TAX KEY NO. 2270.995.013 / W185 S9530 PARKER DRIVE) WHEREAS, A site plan and building drawings were submitted to construct a 42’ x 64’ metal accessory structure (totaling 2,688 square feet) on the Turowski property located at W185 S9530 Parker Drive (Tax Key No. 2270.995.013), and WHEREAS, The property is zoned RC-1 – Country Residence District, and said structure is a permitted accessory use and subject to Plan Commission review due to the proposed architectural materials shown, more specifically due to a proposed steel roof and siding, and WHEREAS, A home residence currently exists on site and there are no other accessory structures currently on the property that the City is aware of, and WHEREAS, The proposed square footage of 2,688 square feet is within the total allowable square footage for accessory structures on this property, which meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, The accessory structure will be used for personal storage only, and WHEREAS, The proposed height is approximately 20 feet, as measured by code, which is within the allowed height of 30 feet, and WHEREAS, The structure is proposed to be clad with steel wall panels and a steel roof and said proposal does not meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures as the siding and roofing do not match the materials of the primary residence, and WHEREAS, The colors of the walls will be a light beige (similar to the home), the roof, soffits and trim will all be a darker beige (similar to the roof on the home) and the architectural features including wainscoting and multiple windows. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The Plan Commission approves of a 2,688 square foot metal accessory structure for the Turowski property located at W185 S9530 Parker Drive (Tax Key No. 2270.995.013). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building and lot cannot be used for the operations of any business activities or for business storage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The floor of the entire building must be concrete or asphalt, unless a specific portion is only to be used by animals. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The colors of the proposed building must be similar to the colors of the home (roof and walls). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The depth of the overhangs on all sides of the building must at least be equal to those on the main home. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of the accessory structure due to no undue harm to the surrounding properties, due to the distance from the roadway and due to the area being rural in character. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the terms of this resolution and the approved site plans shall result in the issuance of fines of $100 per day per violation, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 4 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 38                                   SOUTH-EAST2 R1 NORTH-WEST1 R1 Page 5 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 39 Page 6 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 40 Page 7 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 41 Page 8 of 8 RESOLUTION PC 028-2020 Packet Page 42 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 029-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Second Accessory Structure Tax Key No. 2176.033 / W179 S6920 Muskego Drive SE ¼ of Section 4 PETITIONER: Anthony Vela & Susan Ramano INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 029-2020 The petitioner proposes to construct a 320 square foot accessory structure on site. This building will be the second accessory structure on this lot including the detached garage. Plans are attached for your review. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 029-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the area for medium density residential land use. The proposal for this residential outbuilding is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is predominantly zoned ERS-3 – Existing Suburban Residence District. Accessory structures totaling 992 square feet are permitted on the subject property. The current proposal measures 320 square feet in area. There is one accessory structure (446 SF) that exists on the lot. The grand total of all accessory structure square footage with the proposed accessory structure equals 766 square feet. The proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 029-2020 Design Guide requirements state that Planning Commission approval is needed for more than one accessory structure on a lot when it is being used for residential purposes. Plan Commission approvals are being sought since there is already another accessory structure on this lot. The architectural requirements state that the accessory structure should have similar materials and colors as the principal residence. The building is proposed to be clad with grey siding and charcoal colored shingles, both of which will be similar colors as the home. Said proposal does meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures with the exception of the side/rear yard offsets. In the ERS-3 Zoning District, accessory structures over 120 square feet in size must be 7.5 feet from the side/rear and 11.25 feet from the others. The survey indicates the accessory structure will be 5 feet from the rear property line. Proper side/rear yards must be identified for a building permit. The petitioner has stated that the newly proposed building will be used for personal storage/uses. The Resolution states the following items: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building cannot be used for the operations of any business activities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the colors of the proposed building must be similar to the colors of the home. Page 1 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 43 STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 029-2020 Approval of Resolution #PC 029-2020 Page 2 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 44 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI060120 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 029-2020 Anthony Vela & Susan RomanoW179 S6920 Muskego Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 4/22/2020 Page 3 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 45 RESOLUTION #P.C. 029-2020 APPROVAL OF AN ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR THE ROMANO/VELA PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4 (TAX KEY NO. 2176.033 / W179 S6920 MUSKEGO DRIVE) WHEREAS, A site plan and building drawings were submitted to construct an 320 square foot accessory structure on the property located at W179 S6920 Muskego Drive (Tax Key No. 2176.033), and WHEREAS, The property is zoned ERS-3 Existing Suburban Residence District, and whereas said structure is a permitted accessory use and subject to Plan Commission review due to more than one accessory structure on the lot, and WHEREAS, One accessory structure (446 SF) and a home residence currently reside on the property, and WHEREAS, The combined total of the two (2) outbuildings (one existing and one proposed) will be 766 square feet, which is within the allowed limit, and WHEREAS, The total square footage for accessory structures on this property is limited to 992 square feet, and said proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, The accessory structure will be used for personal storage only, and WHEREAS, The proposed height is approximately 10 feet, as measured by code, which is allowed in said zoning district due to the proposed location on the accessory structure, and WHEREAS, The proposed survey indicates the accessory structure will be 5 feet from the rear property line, that must be adjusted to meet the 7.5 feet from the side/rear and 11.25 feet from the others, and WHEREAS, The structure is proposed to be clad with vinyl siding and asphalt shingles, both of which will be similar to the house, and said proposal does meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of a 320 square foot accessory structure for the Romano/Vela property located at W179 S6920 Muskego Drive (Tax Key No. 2176.033). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The colors of the proposed building must be similar to the colors of the home. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The building cannot be used for the operations of any business activities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Proper side/rear yards must be identified for a building permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the terms of this resolution and the approved site plans shall result in the issuance of fines of $100 per day per violation, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 4 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 46 Page 5 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 47 Page 6 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 48 Page 7 of 7 RESOLUTION PC 029-2020 Packet Page 49 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 021-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Approval of a Building, Site and Operations Plan, Condominium Plat and a Certified Survey Map for the Cobblestone Meadows Development S76 W17501 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2196.958.004 SE ¼ of Section 9 PETITIONER: Home Path Financial INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 021-2020 Home Path Financial has submitted requests for a Building, Site and Operation (BSO) Plan, Certified Survey Map, and Condominium Plat for a future Cobblestone Court development. The proposal for this site is to develop eight separate two-family side-by-side residences. Back in 2015, this property was conditionally approved for a Rezoning and 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendment as PD-48 to allow 16 total units within 8 duplex buildings on this property. The property was never formally mapped/enacted due to the condition in the ordinance relating to BSO approval for the duplex units/development. This new request is to utilize the previous approval, while satisfying the condition requiring a Building, Site and Operation plan approval. A Certified Survey Map and Condominium Plat are also being requested to identify the condominium lot and commercial lot/outlot, to dedicate the new road right-of-way and to layout the condo development/building locations for the future development. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 021-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan currently depicts the area for Commercial uses but a rezoning was granted by Ord. #1396 in 2015 approved a rezoning and land use amendment of this property to PD-48 utilizing the RM-3 – Multiple Family Residence District and B-3 General Business District, subject to Plan Commission approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan. Upon approval of a BSO, the 2020 Plan would be amended to Medium Density Residential uses (for the two-family homes/duplexes) and Commercial uses (for the area adjacent to Janesville Road). The proposal will be consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The area is currently zoned B-3 General Business District along Janesville Road and RS-3 Suburban Residential District in the bulk/rear of the property. This land was previously granted a rezoning under Ord. Page 1 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 50 #1396 in 2015 to PD-48 utilizing the RM-3 – Multiple Family Residence District and B-3 General Business District, subject to Plan Commission approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan. Upon approval of a BSO the area will zoned PD Planned Development District with a base underlying zoning of RM-3 – Multiple Family Residence District for 16 duplex units within 8 buildings (Lot 1) and B-3 – General Business District (Lot 2/Outlot 1). Parks and Conservation Plan: The 2017-2021 Plan does not depict any park areas or conservation areas on this property. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Street System Plan: The developer is working with Waukesha County to ensure the proper Janesville Road right-of-way width is being accounted for and the County will ultimately have to approve the new intersection/access. The new road right-of-way for the development is being dedicated as required as part of the CSM. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Adopted 208 Sanitary Sewer Service Area: The development will be served by municipal sanitary sewer extension. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Water Capacity Assessment District: The development will be served by municipal water extension. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Stormwater Management Plan: As part of the buildout of this entire development, construction, grading and stormwater plans will need to be reviewed for compliance with all applicable codes. Significant review has already occurred, but minor final details need to be wrapped up. DISCUSSION PC 021-2020 Building, Site and Operation Plan As mentioned above, in 2015 this property was conditionally approved for rezoning and 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendment with Plan Commission Resolution PC 023-2015 and Common Council Ordinance #1396. Ordinance #1396 was subject to Plan Commission approvals of a Building, Site, and Operation Plan and any required Council approvals of Subdivider’s Agreements. Approval of this BSO will satisfy one condition and future a Subdivider’s/Developer’s Agreement for the public utility and roadway extensions will satisfy the other condition. The site is located along Janesville Road west of Westwood Drive, formerly known as the “Ingold” property. In all, the density created by this plan would be a total of sixteen (16) multi-family units (in eight buildings) on approximately 6.34 acres. The residential development results in approximately 2.52 units/acre or 1 unit per 17,285 square feet of land (gross). This density falls within the Medium Density Residential use which allow up to 2.99 units per acre. The RM-3 zoning allows 10,000 square feet of land per unit and the proposal fits within that allowance too. The open space required for sixteen units is 112,000 square feet. Based on the site plan submitted there will be 172,230 square feet of open space remaining after the site is fully built-out with all residential dwellings. Site Plan/Access The development will be accessed via a new public road stemming off of Janesville Road extending approximately 476 feet ending with a cul-de-sac. Each of the 16 residential units would access the new interior street. The two-family buildings would be clustered together, while leaving some open spaces around the outside of the development as a buffer from the existing homes in this area. Relating to the location of the buildings, each of the two-family units must meet the required setback of 40 feet minimum per the RM-3 Zoning District being the basis for the PD-48 Planned Development District. All driveways will be private within the development. Page 2 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 51 Parking: Each of the sixteen units will have an attached two-car garage with a separate private driveway. The Zoning Code typically looks to have 2 enclosed stalls per unit for multi-family uses, along with additional guest parking. This proposal meets the parking requirements. Architecture: This development is part of the Downtown and General Design Guides, which indicate that Brick exterior treatment is required. Materials such as decorative masonry and/or natural materials must comprise of 50% of the wall surface. Earth tone colors schemes are required along with four-sided architecture. The design of the development will be two-family side-by-side residences. Each of the buildings will be a slab-on-grade ranch-style home with gable rooftops mixing in some dormers to provide breaks in the roofline. Being ranch-style homes the height restrictions of the City code will be met and verified during the building permit review process. There are two different models proposed in the development, being a Juniper and Cedar. Both models intend to utilize a masonry (stone) for the entire front of the garages and extending the masonry around the buildings up three feet from the ground. Horizontal vinyl siding is proposed above the stone. Vinyl shake-style siding will be on the face of the dormers. The Juniper floorplan, which has been identified as five of the eight buildings has both garages in the front of the building, but only one front entry to provide the appearance of a large single-family residence breaking the monotony of front facing garage doors. The Cedar floorplan is similar to the Juniper except those buildings will be two identical units placed immediately adjacent to one another. Preliminary masonry calculations have been provided that break down as follows:  Juniper o Front – 54% o Each Side – 37% o Rear – 40% o Total – 42%  Cedar o Front – 71% o Each Side – 35% & 37% o Rear – 51% o Total – 47% The City’s design guides typically look for about 50% masonry, but the overall quality of the design and material usage is just as important. The masonry calculations are close to the 50% recommendation, the remainder of the buildings are vinyl siding. There is a mixture of horizontal siding on the buildings and shake vinyl siding in the gables. Several of the buildings will have an exposed foundation wall in the rear where an exposure is typically located. Since these buildings will be slab-on-grade without basement exposure, the exposed foundation walls will be masonry extending the three-foot masonry band level to the lowered grade around the rear of the building, providing additional masonry. The developer has stated they are agreeable to increasing the masonry percentages to 52%, with these increases being provided at the time of building permit review. Lighting: A photometric plan has not been submitted. All lighting needs to meet the code requirements, including all fixtures being full cut-off and zero degree tilt, except where they are an architectural feature. Any freestanding lights cannot have a concrete base that exceeds 6 inches above grade. A final photometric plan and final lighting details will be required before any building permits can be issued. Page 3 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 52 Signage: There has not been any signage proposed at this time. Any future signage will require separate sign permits. Fire Department: The Fire Department needs to review the development plan before any permits can be issued. As such, the resolution states that the final site layout is subject to Fire Department review and approval. Refuse/Mechanicals: Trash and recycling will be picked up on normal scheduled days the same as other residential areas within the City. All refuse/recycling bins must be kept in the individual garages, unless approvals are sought for enclosures. Landscaping: A landscape plan was included as part of the submittal. There are a mixture of trees, shrubs and perennials throughout the site. Twenty four street trees are provided for as required along with tree plantings on-site. Additional landscaping plans were submitted surrounding each of the residential buildings. The landscape plans are subject to formal review by the City Forester before building permits can be issued. Utilities: The property will be serviced with municipal sewer and water. Water and sewer main extensions will be needed as part of the development of this site. Full engineering review will need to occur as this project proceeds further and a developer’s agreement will be required along with a Letter of Credit or Bond for the public utility extension(s). Storm water management is proposed on site to the north of the former school building and Engineering review will be needed to ensure the facilities are sized properly for this full development. Significant engineering review has already occurred and final details are being worked out at this time. Other: All BSO approvals are valid for two years. If all buildings are not started by that time, re-approvals will be required. If any phasing is going to occur as part of the development of this site, details of said phasing must be provided before any permits can be issued. The following are also part of the Plan Commission resolution: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That each elevation must meet or exceed 50-percent masonry. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Final colors selections need to be provided before building permits can be issued. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That no outdoor storage, other than daily driven vehicles, are allowed on the condo property (including but not limited to garbage cans, recycle bins, boats, trailers, campers, junk/wrecked vehicles, etc.). Certified Survey Map Upon initial review of the CSM, the bulk requirements of the code appear to be met for Lot 1. Lot 2, which is located on the east side of the proposed intersection of the new roadway and Janesville Road, does not meet the bulk requirements for being buildable. Due to this, Lot 2 needs to be renamed Outlot 1. The intention with Lot 2 is to combine the lot with the adjacent lot immediately toward the east to help with parking and/or site access. A note must be placed on the CSM stating that this outlot is unbuildable on its own, unless it is attached to the adjacent lot. Page 4 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 53 Technical review has been completed with minor corrections/additions needed prior to the CSM being able to be signed by the City and recorded. Condominium Plat As is noted above, the Condo Plat is being proposed showing approximate layout of the overall condo development and showing the general locations of each of the buildings. The Condo Plat has been reviewed by staff and all technical corrections must be addressed before recording. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 021-2020 Approval of Resolution PC 021-2020 Page 5 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 54 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0340680 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 021-2020 Home Path FinancialS76 W17501 Janesville Road JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 3/24/2020 Page 6 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 55 RESOLUTION #P.C. 021-2020 APPROVAL OF A BUILDING, SITE AND OPERATIONS PLAN, CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PLAT FOR THE COBBLESTONE MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN THE SE ¼ OF SECTION 9 (TAX KEY NO. 2196.958.004 / S76 W17501 JANESVILLE ROAD) WHEREAS, A Building, Site and Operation Plan, Condominium Plat, and Certified Survey Map were submitted for the Cobblestone Meadows development located in the SE ¼ of Section 9 (S76 W17501 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2196.958.004), and WHEREAS, Common Council Ordinance #1396 in 2015 approved a rezoning of this property to PD-48 utilizing the RM-3 – Multiple Family Residence District and B-3 General Business District subject to Plan Commission approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan, and WHEREAS, PD-48 allows 16 total units within 8 duplex buildings on this property and said proposal meets this allowance, and WHEREAS, The 2020 Comprehensive Plan will be amended to Medium Density Residential uses (for the two-family homes/duplexes) and Commercial uses (for the commercial outlot) pursuant to Common Council Ordinance #1396, subject to Plan Commission approval of this Building, Site and Operation Plan, and WHEREAS, The Building, Site and Operations approval includes eight (8) two-family side-by-side residential buildings (16 total residential units) on 6.34 total acres, which breaks down to 2.52 units per acre, which within the 2.99 units per acre allowed under the Medium Density Residential land use and allowed under the RM-3 base zoning, and WHEREAS, A Planned Development Zoning District allows for greater freedom, imagination, and flexibility in the development of land while insuring substantial compliance to the intent of the normal district regulations of the City’s ordinances, and WHEREAS, Access to the site is proposed as a new cul-de-sac off of Janesville Road that will be dedicated to the City as a public right-of-way, and WHEREAS, Each of the residential units will have a two-car garage in addition to private driveways, and WHEREAS, There are two different building types proposed within this development, known as the Juniper and the Cedar, and WHEREAS, The two building designs contain a variety of materials, such as lannon stone, horizontal vinyl siding, split shake vinyl siding and dimensional asphalt shingles, all in a variety of pleasing color palatte options, and WHEREAS, This development is part of the Downtown Design Guide and the General Design Guide, which include the 50% masonry requirement, and WHEREAS, Preliminary masonry calculations have been provided that break down as follows:  Juniper o Front – 54% o Each Side – 37% o Rear – 40% o Total – 42%  Cedar o Front – 71% o Each Side – 35% & 37% o Rear – 51% o Total – 47%, and Page 7 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 56 WHEREAS, Landscape plans for the entire site as well as surrounding individual residential units is included as part of the submittal and there is a mixture of trees, shrubs and perennials on portions of the site, and WHEREAS, The property will be serviced with municipal sewer and municipal water, and WHEREAS, Water and sewer main extensions are needed as part of this development, and WHEREAS, Significant Engineering review has already occurred and final engineering sign-off will need to occur as this project proceeds further and because public utility extensions are required, a developer’s agreement will be required along with a Letter of Credit or Bond, and WHEREAS, Stormwater management is proposed on site and continued Engineering review will be needed to ensure the facilities are sized properly for this full development, and WHEREAS, The proposed CSM contains two (2) lots ranging in size from 9,252 SF (Lot 2/Outlot 1) to 228,992 SF (Lot 1) and the CSM will dedicate the new public road to service this development, and WHEREAS, Lot 1 will become Cobblestone Meadows Condo development, and WHEREAS, Lot 2 (to be changed to Outlot 1) is a remnant outlot that is unbuildable on its own, but there is a tentative proposal to have this outlot possibly sold to or used for access to/for the adjacent commercial land owner to the east, and WHEREAS, The Condo Plat is showing the approximate layout of the condo development, and WHEREAS, The Condo Plat and Certified Survey Map are in the review process and all technical corrections must be addressed before recording. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves a Building, Site and Operations Plan, Condo Plat and Certified Survey Map for Cobblestone Meadows in the SE ¼ of Section 9 (S76 W17501 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2196.958.004) subject to resolution of technical discrepancies as identified by the Planning Division and Engineering Division, and payment of all applicable fees in the Land Division Ordinance and outstanding assessments if applicable. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The landscape plans are subject to formal review by the City Forester and Planning staff before building permits can be issued. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Sign permits are required for any/all signage (temporary or permanent). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All zoning setback and offsets must be met. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Any building/site lighting will need to be submitted and approved before any building permits can be issued. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Final colors selections need to be provided before building permits can be issued. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That each elevation must meet or exceed 50-percent masonry. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, In the case of units with any exposures and/or grade changes, the masonry band must extend onto exposed foundation walls, providing additional masonry. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That no outdoor storage, other than daily driven vehicles, are allowed on the condo property (including but not limited to garbage cans, recycle bins, boats, trailers, campers, junk/wrecked vehicles, etc.). Page 8 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 57 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All refuse/recycling bins must be stored within the individual garages, unless approvals for enclosures are sought. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The final site layout is subject to Fire Department review and approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Since BSO approvals are valid for two years, if all of the buildings are not started by that time, re-approvals will be required. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, If any phasing is going to occur as part of the development of this site, details of said phasing must be provided before any permits can be issued. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of said plans be kept on file in the City and that all aspects of this plan shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise authorized by the Plan Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines for each day that a violation occurs, the initiation of legal action, or both. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All technical corrections from the City will need to be addressed before the Certified Survey Map and Condo Plat can be signed and recorded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a digital file of the CSM and Condo Plat shall be submitted to the City. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 9 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 58 Zoning: RM-1 & RS-3 Gross Site Area: 6.298 Ac Proposed Units: 16 + 2 Gross Density: 2.86 Units/Ac Setbacks: 40' Front 15' Rear 10' Side SCALE IN FEET 040' 40' SE 1/4, Section 9, T5N, R20E City of Muskego, Waukesha County Cobblestone Court Date: JOB #: Sheet:EX-1 490326 03/18/2020 Zoning: B-3 Gross Site Area: 1.185 Ac Proposed Units: 0 Gross Density: N/A (920) 757-7532www.payneanddolan.com Page 10 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 59 To: City of Muskego Planning Commission and Muskego Neighbors Attached in this document is the overview of the business site and operation plan for the proposed residential development for Cobblestone Court, the 6.70-acre site of the former Ingold Farm site at S76 W17501 Janesville Road. This submission contains: Project Overview: Home Path Financial LP has proposed for the former Ingold Farm property 8 residential buildings with 2 units per building for a total of 16 units. Homepath is not proposing any zoning change for the currently vacant land. The front piece of property (1.1185 acres) will retain B-1 zoning and the back portion of the property (5.5815 acres) will remain zoned RS-3. All the buildings are proposed on the back portion of the property (zoned RS-3). No buildings are proposed in the B-1 zoning. Project Background: Homepath has had a continual dialogue with the community first presenting the proposed development in June of 2019. In general, attendees spoke positively about the development and noted that the development will help drainage in the neighborhood, the price point between $325,000 - $375,000 was well received, and that the proposal makes good use of the property. Subsequently, Homepath has participated in three sperate public meetings throughout December and January with the city staff, planning commission, and the Common Council, and many neighbors actively participating. Ultimately, Homepath appreciated the feedback and is very happy to go forward with a more agreeable 16 units for the neighborhood. Homepath strongly believes this development will be a major win-win for the community through improving area drainage, adding incremental tax base, and creating more neighborhood stakeholders to be good stewards of the vibrant neighborhood. The site was identified on the 2020 Muskego comprehensive plan as ‘Commercial’ abutting land identified as ‘Residential’. Upon talking with the Muskego City Staff and examining the site geography, commercial is not likely the highest and best use on such a site due to the elevations and limited access to Janesville Road. Said another way, we strongly believe that the site as situated is not feasible for commercial development. We believe that aligning with the neighboring ‘residential’ land use aligns well with intent of the comprehensive plan. This site is at the transition area from commercial to residential and our proposed usage reflects that transition. Further, we believe that the proposed residential development will match with and enhance the character of the neighborhood. Page 11 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 60 The proposed land use for the subject property is residential and Homepath Financial projects 16 residential units across 6.70 acres which represents 2.39 units/ acre, which is well below the maximum allowed in the City comprehensive plan of 2.99 units/ acre. We believe that this site density will be a good fit for the neighborhood with less density than the development across Janesville Road and the proposed seniors housing development. The proposed floor area of the proposed development has 172,230.79 square feet of open space which easily exceeds the minimum of 112,000 square feet. On the balance, we strongly believe the site will be a density consistent with the surrounding Janesville Road corridor neighborhood. Homepath expects that the site is well situated and unlikely to generate undue pedestrian or automobile traffic noise or other externalities. According to the 2014-2018 rolling average of the American Community Survey, the average Wisconsin household has 2.40 individuals. There are 16 planned units. Homepath expects this development to be in line with the state average. The estimate translates to 38.4 individuals for the entire development. With the development being residential, hours of operation should be individuals primarily leaving for work in the morning and returning in the evening. With a location along Janesville Road, we anticipate no noticeable traffic impact. Water usage and sanitary sewer should be fairly typical for a residential development; there is no anticipated public nuisance. Additionally, there are no hazardous materials anticipated to be stored on site. The existing environmental features include partially wooded land with trees scattered around an open field with clay loam and silt loam soils. There are no known delineated wetlands, floodplains, or environmental corridors on the site. Home Path Financial LP is a Waukesha County-based real estate investment firm which has brought over 70 attractive and quality homes to buyers since 2016, working with municipalities to sustainably develop homes that are attractive community assets, providing incremental tax revenue for the communities. Home Path Financial LP also has a bevy of attractive and well-maintained rental properties (300+) throughout the Milwaukee area. Home Path Financial is dedicated to a business model that brings quality homes to buyers, sustainable development for neighborhoods, work for contractors, and dynamic employment opportunities. As much as anything, Home Path Financial takes pride in improving people’s lives. Team Overview: Leading the Home Path Financial LP development team is Ed Woodland, who has over 30 years of experience in residential homebuilding including positions as Division President with John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods and CalAtlantic Homes. In these roles, Ed has been responsible for Land Acquisition, Land Development, Sales, Construction and Customer Service for Divisions with annual revenues exceeding $220 million and with over 500 annual deliveries. Ed holds a B.A in Economics and Business Page 12 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 61 Administration from the Ursinus College in Collegeville, Pennsylvania. Ed is a Licensed General Contractor in the State of Florida. Ed can be reached at ewoodland@myhomepath.com and (262) 336-3862. Homepath has engaged Craig Donze PE PLS, Engineering Manager at Payne and Dolan as the engineer and land surveyor. Craig has been working on this Cobblestone project since early summer. Craig has an immense breadth and depth of experience (20+ years) from value engineering through direct responsibility for infrastructure design and construction. Craig can be reached at cdonze@payneanddolan.com and (262) 366-5086. Payne & Dolan, Inc. has been serving the needs of its customers for over 85 years. As a leading engineering firm, Payne & Dolan has established a strong commitment to quality, safety, innovation, and leadership. Payne and Dolan has a team of talented civil engineers who are well equipped to provide a full range of construction services including design consultation and construction oversight. Homepath has engaged raSmith’s Landscape Architecture division to design the landscape. The group is headed by Mr. Luke J. Haas PLA. Luke has nearly 15 years of experience in the landscape architecture field. As a licensed landscape architect, he has worked on a variety of projects throughout his career including comprehensive plans for multi-family residential and commercial developments, courtyards and plazas, streetscapes and community parks. raSmith is a multi-disciplinary consulting firm comprising civil engineers, structural engineers, land surveyors, development managers, landscape architects, ecologists, and construction inspectors and managers. The firm’s diversified experience ensures a personalized, focused approach for stakeholders. Page 13 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 62 Exterior Description: Homepath plans on a cohesive site with a high-end feel. To that end, there will be two major floorplan varieties intermixed in the development to create a ‘community’ feel. The variation in unit types allows for a diversity of curb appeal while all following a cohesive upscale neighborhood plan. We believe this mix of units will allow for a vibrant neighborhood. Homepath plans to use the Juniper floorplan for units: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, and 16. Homepath intends to use the Cedar floor plan for units: 3, 4, 9, 10, 13, and 14 (see below for image). Page 14 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 63 Juniper Front Layout: The Juniper (above) will be a very attractive, high-end layout. One of the townhome units will have a front entry garage and the other will have a side entry garage. We believe that the offset garages give the building an attractive look resembling an especially large single-family home at a glance. Surrounding the garage door is very attractive Lannon Stone which goes all the way up to the roof. Opposite the garage door there is a bay of three windows representing the front sitting area of one of the units. On the second floor, we anticipate an attractive dormer with split shake vinyl siding and a bay of three half windows. We feel that this will provide each development depth of materials which all mesh together for a very appealing front face. There are prefabricated support columns on the sides creating a covered entrance way for both residents. Approximately 10 feet towards the center (in both directions) are two doorways. On the viewer’s left as one faces the home’s front elevation is a garage door. Surrounding the garage door is very attractive Lannon Stone which goes all the way up to the roof. Opposite the garage door there is a bay of three windows representing the front sitting area of one of the units. Page 15 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 64 Juniper Left Elevation: Lannon Stone will make up the lower four feet of the exterior and up to the roofline for the three feet adjacent to the garage. The rest will be attractive vinyl siding. Column out front creates a ‘stoop’ look. There will be a window bay with two full-size windows. About 4 feet away will be a window bay with two half-size windows. Approximately 15 feet away will be another window bay with two full size windows. About 5 feet back will be another attractive prefabricated column. There will be two columns creating an overhang for a walkout area for a building entrance. Further back will be an attractive garage door. Page 16 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 65 Juniper Right Elevation: Lannon Stone makes up the lower four feet of the exterior and up to the roofline for the three feet adjacent to the rear elevation. The masonry, we believe, gives the face a high-end feel. The rest will be attractive vinyl siding. We believe this combination gives the site depth. The columns will be at the front with a stoop area. There will be a window bay with two full-size windows. About 4 feet away will be a window bay with two half-size windows. Approximately 15 feet away will be another window bay with two full size windows. To the right of the third window bank will be two columns creating an overhang for a walkout area for a building entrance. On the second floor, we anticipate an attractive dormer with split shake vinyl siding. Page 17 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 66 Juniper Rear Elevation: The Juniper Rear Elevation is slated to be perfectly symmetrical. The bottom half of the rear elevation is to be Lannon stone. The top half up to the roof is to be visually appealing, high-end vinyl siding. There are to be four window bays, which are mirror images of each other and two patio doors on each side. Where the patio doors look out will be two columns that support the roof overhang, which creates an attractive walkout area residents can use in any weather. Page 18 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 67 Cedar Layout Front Elevation: Homepath anticipates a limestone sill exterior for the entire garages. Above the garages will be split shake vinyl siding. Additionally, there will be split shake vinyl siding on the dormer peeking out of the roof in the front. For the main entryways, Homepath proposes limestone sill for the bottom four feet of the front exterior. The remainder of the front-facing side will be composed on attractive vinyl. Each building will have three prefabricated columns in the front. Additionally, each building is planned to have two attractive windows bays (each with two windows) surrounded by sill trim. The whole window bay is projected to be 4 feet x 4 feet. Additionally, there will be split shake vinyl siding on the steeple peeking out of the roof in the front. Page 19 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 68 Cedar Layout Back Elevation: The bottom 4 feet will be constructed of the same limestone sill exterior. The remaining portion of the back-face’s exterior will be attractive vinyl siding. The back area will have two doors. There will be three standard windows adjacent to each other and then two other windows. We anticipate an attractive vinyl shake dormer Page 20 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 69 Cedar Layout Side Elevations: Both side faces are mirror images of each other. The side faces will have the same limestone sill exterior for the bottom 4 feet and on the side of the face closest to the front the limestone sill reaches up to the roof. The remainder of the side will feature attractive vinyl siding. There will be three side windows. Also, we anticipate an attractive vinyl shake dormer. From the sides, we believe that the floor plan is highly attractive with a fair amount of depth and looks very much like a single-family home at a glance. We think the side faces will be an excellent fit for the neighborhood. Page 21 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 70 Landscaping Description: Homepath proposes a visually appealing, tasteful landscape. There are planned to be 12 State Street Miyabe Maple trees, 10 Frontier Elm trees, and 11 Chicagoland Hackberry trees. These tall deciduous trees were selected because they will create lush curb appeal. These street trees will also be specifically tailored to not impair sightlines from driveways. The appeal of the planned trees is largely they provide the right amount of shade. Additionally, Homepath has proposed a great number of trees in back and front yards to create attractive shaded yards for residents to enjoy in all seasons. There will be a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees in yards which allows for versatility across all seasons allowing for residents to get to experience all four seasons, while minimizing raking as much as possible. The trees are also positioned to make the retaining wall much less prominent. Shrubbery will surround each of the buildings. The side elevations will have shrubs running the length of the building with the exception of the side facing garages present in the Juniper plan. Front stoop areas will feature attractive floral plantings with Daylilys, Hostas, Catmints, and Black-Eyed Susans. We believe the landscaping will be a major asset for the community creating a lush garden-community feel. Page 22 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 71 Duplex - 20200319 Rev Page 23 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 72 COBBLESTONE MEADOWS Lot 1 Certified Survey Map No. 11325 as recorded in the Waukesha County Registry, as Document No. 4152139, being a part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 5 North, Range 20 East, City of Muskego, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. VICINITY MAP SE 1/4 Section 9 T5N, R20E Scale: 1"=2000' INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CRAIG T DONZE PLS 3182 SHEET 1 OF 2 SE 1/4 SITE SURVEYOR'S CERTICATE STATE OF WISCONSIN} :SS WASHINGTON COUNTY} I, CRAIG T. DONZE, a professional land surveyor, do hereby certify: THAT I have surveyed, the property described on this plat and that the survey is an accurate representation of the exterior boundary lines and the location of the buildings on the property. The condominium plat is correct representation of Cobblestone Meadows Condominium and the identification and location of each unit and the common elements can be determined from the plat. THAT I have made this survey, land division, and map by the direction of Home Path Financial, L.P., owner of said land. THAT such map is a correct representation of all the exterior boundaries of the land surveyed and the land division thereof made. THAT I have fully complied with the provisions of Chapter 236 of the Wisconsin Statutes, and the the City of Muskego Land Division and Zoning Ordinances in surveying, dividing and mapping the same. _____________________________________ Dated this 19th day of February 2020 Craig T. Donze Professional Land Surveyor, S-3182 Notes/Lengend: Found Property Corner Marker, 1" I.D. Iron Pipe, unless noted otherwise. Indicates 1-1/4" (#10) rebar, weight 4.30 lbs. per lineal foot, at least 18" in length, set. All linear measurements have been made to the nearest one hundredth foot. All angular measurements have been made to the nearest second and computed to the nearest one-half second. All dimensions shown to the nearest hundredth of a foot. Dimensions along curves are arc lengths. Bearing Reference Bearing are referred to the east line of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T5N, R20E, which bears N01°13'04"W (Wisconsin State Plane Coordinate System, South Zone), which is based on the North American Datum of 1927, NAD-27 (SEWRPC CSSD, Last Revised Feb 2015). Owner/Declarant: Home Path Financial, L.P. 19435 W. Capitol Drive, Suite 102 Brookfield, WI 53045 Prepared by: Payne & Dolan, Inc. N6W23673 Bluemound Road Waukesha, WI 53188 SCALE IN FEET 0100' 100' 9 Page 24 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 73 LOT 1 228,992 SF 5.257 Ac Janes v i l l e R o a d C . T . H . " L " (R.O . W . V a r i e s ) P a r k C i r c l e ( 6 0 ' R . O . W . ) S 2 5 ° 4 8 ' 1 4 " E 2 3 1 . 5 0 ' N61° 4 2 ' 4 6 " E 1 3 5 . 0 0 ' S 2 6 ° 0 0 ' 0 9 " E 1 3 8 . 7 4 ' S 1 0 ° 2 8 ' 4 0 " E 2 2 2 . 1 4 ' S0 1 ° 3 3 ' 1 5 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' S88°49'39"W 5.00' S1 1 ° 2 4 ' 2 4 " W 1 1 1 . 8 2 ' S88°49'39"W 477.87' N0 2 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " W 4 8 0 . 9 8 ' N76°58'3 8 " E 1 2 5 . 2 3 ' N 1 1 ° 5 4 ' 4 6 " W 1 5 3 . 9 9 ' P a r k D r i v e ( 4 9 . 7 5 ' R . O . W . ) UNPLATTED LANDS P A R C E L 1 P A R C E L 2 C.S.M . 2 6 6 7 LOT 2 C.S.M. 11325 LOT 1 C.S.M. 11325 PARCEL 1 C.S.M. 7170 PARCEL 1 C.S.M. 4432 1 2 3 4 5 UNPLATTED LANDS ST. LEONARD'S SUBD. BLOCK 1 C.S.M. 123 UNPLATTED LANDS OU T L O T 3 KR I S T I N D O W N S U B D . OU T L O T 3 30' WATER MAIN EASEMENT UN P L A T T E D LA N D S (REC S89°09'50"W 475.46') (R E C N 0 2 ° 3 1 ' 5 0 " W & N 0 2 ° 1 6 ' 2 5 " W ) (REC N7 8 ° 3 5 ' 2 5 " E ) ( R E C N 1 2 ° 1 6 ' 4 0 " W ) ( R E C S 2 5 ° 5 1 ' 4 3 " E ) (REC N 6 2 ° 0 0 ' 5 6 " E ) ( R E C S 2 6 ° 5 6 ' 0 0 " E 1 3 8 . 4 0 ' & S 2 5 ° 3 1 ' 0 0 " E 1 3 9 . 0 0 ' ) ( R E C S 1 0 ° 0 9 ' 2 8 " E 2 2 2 . 1 7 ' ) (R E C S 0 1 ° 1 3 ' 0 4 " E ) (R E C S 1 1 ° 4 6 ' 4 0 " W ) (REC S89°09'50"W) 91 ° 0 6 ' 3 3 " 101° 1 7 ' 3 2 " 2 6 8 ° 3 4 ' 5 1 " 87 ° 4 2 ' 5 5 " 164°28 ' 3 1 " 171°04'35" 1 0 2 ° 3 4 ' 4 5 " 89° 3 7 ' 0 6 " 167°02'21" 27 2 ° 2 9 ' 0 0 " L O T 2 9 , 2 5 2 S F 0 . 2 1 2 A c C1 C2 C3 C4 C 5 C 6 C 7 S 1 8 ° 4 1 ' 1 4 " E 4 3 . 5 2 ' S 1 7 ° 0 5 ' 1 3 " E 1 1 3 . 7 3 ' N 1 7 ° 0 5 ' 1 3 " W 2 0 5 . 3 8 ' N 1 8 ° 4 1 ' 1 4 " W 4 8 . 1 2 ' C 8 C 9 C10 C1 1 8.06' 18.82' LOT 3 C.S.M. 11325 D E D I C A T E D T O T H E C I T Y O F M U S K E G O F O R P U B L I C R O A D P U R P O S E S 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 1 0 . 0 0 ' 15 ' D R A I N A G E EA S E M E N T 15.00' VISIO N C O R N E R EASE M E N T VISIO N CORN E R EASE M E N T CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP NO - _________ BEARING REFERENCE - BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE WISC. STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, GRID NORTH, SOUTH ZONE (NAD27), WITHIN WHICH THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T5N, R20E, HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N01°13'04"W (PER CSSD AS REVISED FEB. 2015) OWNER/SUBDIVIDER: Home Path Financial, L.P. 19435 W. Capitol Drive Suite 102 Brookfield, WI 53045 TAX PIN: MSKC 2196-958-004 TEL 920.757.7559 | FAX 920.757.2906 www.payneanddolan.com PAYNE & DOLAN I N C O R P O R A T E D A WALBEC GROUP COMPANY PREPARED BY: P.O.B. Page 25 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 74 SAN SAN SAN W W W W SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN W W W SAN SAN SS S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WW WW SA N SA N WW SA N SAN WWSAN WW SA N WSA NWSA N SA N WV WVWV X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXX X X XSTO X W W W W S G G G G G G G G G E E E E E E E EEE S S S S T O S S S S S S S S S S WV WV WV WV W W W W W W W W F O F O E E E E E E E E E E E F O F O F O F O E E E E TT E E W W W T T T T TTT PARK CIR C L E J a n e s v i l l e R o a d ( C T H " L " ) (1) ABS (1) SSC (1) SSC (1) ABS (4) FXE (3) CHH (3) SMM (3) CHH (3) SMM (3) SL (2) SMM (2) SMM (3) FXE (1) SSC (2) SM (1) CHH (1) SMM (1) SSC (1) SSC (1) WS (1) RO (2) CHH(2) WP (1) WP (1) SL (3) BRC (3) WS (1) RO (1) SL (1) SL (2) SBS (1) RO (3) BRC (1) SMM (1) RO (1) SL (2) FXE (2) BC (1) SM(1) SWO (3) WP (3) BC (1) FXE (1) SM (1) CHH (1) CHH (1) SWO (1) SSC (1) SSC (1) ABS 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 65 4 3 2 1 POND POND LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWNLAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN S S PLANT SCHEDULE - TREES WRITTEN CONSENT OF R.A. SMITH, INC. OR ALTERATIONS MADE TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED FOR DAMAGES, LIABILITY OR COSTS RESULTING FROM CHANGES R.A. SMITH, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. THERE MAY BE OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY INSTALLATIONS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. THE SHEET NUMBER Br o o k f i e l d , W I | M i l w a u k e e , W I | A p p l e t o n , W I | M a d i s o n , W I | C e d a r b u r g , W I Mo u n t P l e a s a n t , W I | N a p e r v i l l e , I L | I r v i n e , C A 15 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 NORTH Know what's R CO B B L E S T O N E C O U R T MU S K E G O , W I PR E L I M I N A R Y L A N D S C A P E P L A N TR E E S & S E E D I N G STREET TREES: 1,177 LF OF STREET FRONTAGE - PARK CIRCLE 1 LARGE TREE TREE REQUIRED PER 50 LF OF STREET FRONTAGE REQUIRED: 24 TREES PROVIDED: 24 TREES BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTINGS PROVIDED THIS PLAN IS FOR MUNICIPAL REVIEW NOT FOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES SEE SHEETS L101 AND L102 FOR BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE PLANS Page 26 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 75 21 (1) QFH (5) H4 (5) LEH (5) DSY (3) DKL (7) SDN (3) NE4 (1) ER (5) DBC (1) ER (6) H16 (4) SDN (5) GSJ (7) AJN (5) H4 (16) HO4 (11) HE2(5) GAC (11) HE2 LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN WALK DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 1&2 PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 3&4 PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 5&6 PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 7&8 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 43 (6) PFS (4) QFH (6) DSY (3) MNW (4) MNW (7) RU7 (7) H16 (1) DKL (1) DKV (3) SDN (1) DKV (8) H16 (5) SDN (4) MNW (5) LDN (4) MNW (4) PFS LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN WALK WALK DRIVEWAYDRIVEWAY 87 (1) LEH (1) DKL (1) LEH (1) DKL (1) ER (1) ER (1) DKL (7) AJN (6) H16 (5) GAC (6) H16 (15) HO4 (5) DSY (4) SDN (4) H16 (7) MNW (3) NE4 (7) PFS (6) H16 (6) DBC (6) PJC LAWN AWN LAWN LAWN LAW LAWN LAWN LAWN L WALK DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY S S S S S S S S S S S S 65 (6) HO4 (6) RU7 (7) HO4 (5) LEH (5) PFS (6) HO4 (1) QFH (5) DSY (4) SDN (1) DKL (1) DKV (1) DKV (4) H4 (6) DBC (3) H4 (7) SDN (10) NE4 (1) DKL (7) MNW (6) PJC (1) DKL LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN WALK DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY WRITTEN CONSENT OF R.A. SMITH, INC. OR ALTERATIONS MADE TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED FOR DAMAGES, LIABILITY OR COSTS RESULTING FROM CHANGES R.A. SMITH, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. THERE MAY BE OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY INSTALLATIONS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. THE CO B B L E S T O N E C O U R T MU S K E G O , W I PR E L I M I N A R Y L A N D S C A P E P L A N BU I L D I N G S 1 - 8 SHEET NUMBER Br o o k f i e l d , W I | M i l w a u k e e , W I | A p p l e t o n , W I | M a d i s o n , W I | C e d a r b u r g , W I Mo u n t P l e a s a n t , W I | N a p e r v i l l e , I L | I r v i n e , C A 5 10 20 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 NORTH Know what's R NORTH NORTH NORTH BUILDING 7 & 8BUILDING 5 & 6 BUILDING 1 & 2 BUILDING 3 & 4 SEE SHEET L100 FOR OVERALL TREE AND LAWN PLAN THIS PLAN IS FOR MUNICIPAL REVIEW NOT FOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Page 27 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 76 W W W 109 (6) MNW (4) QFH (6) DSY (3) PFS (4) SDN (1) DKV (9) HE2 (6) HO9 (1) QFH (1) DKV (3) SDN (8) H16 (5) SDN (3) GSJ (3) RPW (3) GSJ (4) PFS LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN WALK WALK DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 9&10 PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 11&12 PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 13&14 PLANT SCHEDULE BLDG 15&16 W W W 1211 (16) H4 (10) NE4 (5) MNW (1) ER (1) DKL (1) DKL (1) DKL (1) QFH (1) ER (1) DKV (10) NE4 (6) PJC (5) SH2 (7) PFS (12) HE2 (7) SDN (3) H4 (4) DBC (4) H16 (7) MNW (4) SH2 (7) AJN (4) PJC LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN WALK DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY S S S S SS SS SS SS 1615 LAWN (5) H4 (1) RPW (20) NE4 (6) AJN (4) PJC (4) DBC (1) DKV (1) DKL (7) H4 (6) SDN (1) DKL (1) DKV (11) HE2 (7) PFS (3) SH2 (7) SDN (8) DSY (7) RU7 (5) GAC (7) RU7 (1) DKL (1) RPW LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN WALK DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SS SS SS SS 1413 (5) DBC (5) RPW (17) PL3 (5) GSJ (3) PFS (4) SDN (1) DKV (1) QFH (6) H4 (6) NE4 (3) SDN (1) DKV (13) HE2 (5) PFS (5) H4 (1) LEH (5) DSY (1) LEH (10) PV2 (4) DBC LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWN LAWNLAWN LAWN WALK WALK DRIVEWAYDRIVEWAY WRITTEN CONSENT OF R.A. SMITH, INC. OR ALTERATIONS MADE TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED FOR DAMAGES, LIABILITY OR COSTS RESULTING FROM CHANGES R.A. SMITH, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. THERE MAY BE OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY INSTALLATIONS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. THE SHEET NUMBER Br o o k f i e l d , W I | M i l w a u k e e , W I | A p p l e t o n , W I | M a d i s o n , W I | C e d a r b u r g , W I Mo u n t P l e a s a n t , W I | N a p e r v i l l e , I L | I r v i n e , C A 5 10 20 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 Know what's R CO B B L E S T O N E C O U R T MU S K E G O , W I PR E L I M I N A R Y L A N D S C A P E P L A N BU I L D I N G S 9 - 1 6 NORTHNORTH NORTH NORTH BUILDING 15 & 16BUILDING 13 & 14 BUILDING 9 & 10 BUILDING 11 & 12 SEE SHEET L100 FOR OVERALL TREE AND LAWN PLAN THIS PLAN IS FOR MUNICIPAL REVIEW NOT FOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Page 28 of 28 RESOLUTION PC 021-2020 Packet Page 77 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 022-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Two (2) Lot Land Division – Certified Survey Map S77 W17530 St. Leonards Drive & S77 W17527 St. Leonards Drive / Tax Key Nos. 2196.036 & 2196.042 SE ¼ of Section 9 PETITIONER: Home Path Financial INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 022-2020 The petitioner is proposing to clear up a gap that was found in the Waukesha County mapping by Certified Survey Map (CSM). This proposal was previously approved by the Plan Commission in December of 2019 but denied by the Common Council based on the overall rezoning proposal that accompanied the Certified Survey Map. On either side of St Leonards Drive (to the north and the south) there is a piece of land approximately 25 feet wide at the southern end and 30 feet wide at the northern end and 360 feet long that was unaccounted for per Waukesha County mapping. The applicant researched past documentation and found the land is owned by St. Leonards Church. St. Leonards Church has a tentative agreement to sell this land the Home Path Financial. The purpose of this Certified Survey Map is to adjoin the property to the neighboring lots, dedicate a portion as road right-of-way to the City for St. Leonards Drive and provide a proper water main easement so the developer can extend water to the proposed Cobblestone Meadows development. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 022-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the areas for medium density residential uses. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned RS-3 – Suburban Residence District. This zoning requires minimum lot sizes of 15,000 SF and an average lot width of 100’. All lots are also required to have at least 80 feet of frontage on a dedicated right-of-way. Parks and Conservation Plan: The 2017-2021 Plan does not depict any park or conservation areas on this property. Street System Plan: The proper right-of-way will be dedicated with this CSM. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Adopted 208 Sanitary Sewer Service Area: This area is served by sanitary sewer. The proposal is consistent with the plan. Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION PC 022-2020 Packet Page 78 Water Capacity Assessment District: City water is available to the west. An easement is included to extend the water main. The proposal is consistent with the plan. Stormwater Management Plan: Not applicable. DISCUSSION PC 022-2020 The CSM is clarifying an existing gap in the mapping. St. Leonard’s Church, who is the owner of the property, will be transferring the property to Home Path Financial. Home Path Financial will be dedicating the right-of-way to the City for St. Leonards Drive, establishing a water main easement to extend water to the Cobblestone Development and then transferring the land to the existing property owners to the east of the gap. A technical review has been completed with minor corrections/additions needed prior to the CSM can be signed by the City and recorded. Staff recommends approval subject to meeting all items noted above and all technical corrections received from the Engineering/Planning Divisions. The Resolution is drafted accordingly. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 022-2020 Approval of Resolution PC 022-2020 Page 2 of 5 RESOLUTION PC 022-2020 Packet Page 79 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0340680 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 022-2020 Home Path FinancialS76 W17501 Janesville Road JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 3/24/2020 Page 3 of 5 RESOLUTION PC 022-2020 Packet Page 80 RESOLUTION #P.C. 022-2020 APPROVAL OF A TWO LOT CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP FOR HOME PATH FINANCIAL LOCATED SOUTH OF COBBLESTONE MEADOWS ADJACENT TO ST. LEONARD DRIVE (WEST OF S77 W17530 ST LEONARDS DRIVE AND S77 W17527 ST LEONARDS DRIVE) WHEREAS, A Certified Survey Map (CSM) was submitted by Home Path Financial to clear up a gap in Waukesha County mapping, adding land to two existing lots and dedicating right-of-way located west of S77 W17530 St. Leonards Drive and S77 W17527 St. Leonards Drive, and WHEREAS, The land is being transferred to the lots immediately east of the gap, being S77 W17530 St. Leonards Drive (Tax Key No. 2196.036) and S77 W17527 St. Leonards Drive (Tax Key No. 2196.042), and WHEREAS, The proposed amended lots are approximately 0.433 acres (18,882 square feet) and 0.435 acres (18,959 square feet) in size, and WHEREAS, The property is zoned RS-3 Suburban Residence District and requires minimum lot sizes of 15,000 SF with a minimum average width of 100 feet per lot, and WHEREAS, The 2020 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for medium density residential uses and the proposal is consistent with the plan, and WHEREAS, The area for St. Leonards Drive right-of-way is being dedicated to the City of Muskego for road purposes, and WHEREAS, A water main easement needs to be provided on the west side of the northern lot (Lot 1) to allow for a water main extension to the proposed Cobblestone Meadows development, and WHEREAS, Both lots are currently served by private water wells, and WHEREAS, Both lots are served by municipal sanitary sewer. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of a Certified Survey Map submitted Home Path Financial for a two (2) lot land division located along St. Leonards Drive including S77 W17530 St. Leonards Drive (Tax Key No. 2196.036) and S77 W17527 St. Leonards Drive (Tax Key No. 2196.042), subject to technical corrections as identified by the City Engineers/Planners, and payment of all applicable fees and outstanding assessments if applicable. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All technical corrections from the City will need to be addressed before the Certified Survey Map can be signed and recorded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, A digital file of this CSM shall be submitted to the City. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 4 of 5 RESOLUTION PC 022-2020 Packet Page 81 St. Leonard's Drive (60' R.O.W.) 1 2 ST . L E O N A R D ' S S U B D . B L O C K 1 KR I S T I N D O W N S U B D . OU T L O T 3 S88°49'39"W 127.30' N0 1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " W 1 5 0 . 0 0 ' S0 2 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 6 0 . 0 8 ' N0 1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' S0 2 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " E 6 0 . 0 1 ' N0 1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " W 1 5 0 . 0 0 ' N88°49'15"E 124.97' S89°11'50"W 27.64' LOT 1 18,882 SF 0.433 Ac DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGO FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES LOT 2 18,959 SF 0.435 Ac 78 KR I S T I N D O W N S U B D . 77 ST . L E O N A R D ' S S U B D . B L O C K 2 1 2 6 0 . 0 0 ' 6 0 . 0 0 ' N0 2 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " W 1 5 0 . 2 2 ' S89°12'52"W 26.52' N88°49'39"E 96.85' S88°49'39"W 101.27' 16 ' P U B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T , R I G H T S GR A N T E D T O T H E C I T Y O F M U S K E G O 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 1 0 . 0 0 ' 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 1 0 . 0 0 ' 16.00' 16.00' 15 ' D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T 15 ' D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T OU T L O T 4 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, RIGHTS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGO 16 ' P U B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T , R I G H T S GR A N T E D T O T H E C I T Y O F M U S K E G O 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, RIGHTS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGO S0 2 ° 1 6 ' 5 5 " E 1 4 9 . 8 5 ' CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP NO - _________ BEARING REFERENCE - BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE WISC. STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, GRID NORTH, SOUTH ZONE (NAD27), WITHIN WHICH THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T5N, R20E, HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N01°13'04"W (PER CSSD AS REVISED FEB. 2018) OWNER/SUBDIVIDER: Home Path Financial, L.P. 19435 W. Capitol Drive Suite 102 Brookfield, WI 53045 TAX PIN: MSKC 2196-958-004 TEL 920.757.7559 | FAX 920.757.2906 www.payneanddolan.com PAYNE & DOLAN I N C O R P O R A T E D A WALBEC GROUP COMPANY PREPARED BY: NE COR OF SE 1/4 SEC 09 T5N R20E FOUND CONC MON WITH BRASS CAP 336,820.37 2,501,148.43 SE COR OF SE 1/4 SEC 09 T5N R20E FOUND CONC MON WITH BRASS CAP 334,166.03 2,501,204.86 N 0 1 ° 0 3 ' 0 4 " W 26 5 4 . 9 4 ' EA S T L I N E S E 1 / 4 SE C 9 - 5 - 2 0 S 0 1 ° 0 3 ' 0 4 " E 13 2 5 . 4 2 ' N 0 1 ° 0 3 ' 0 4 " W 13 2 0 . 5 2 ' S 88° 49' 39" W 963.81'POB Page 5 of 5 RESOLUTION PC 022-2020 Packet Page 82 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 030-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Conceptual Review for Whorley Storage Tax Key No. 2180.994.004 / Racine Avenue between Starz and Fox River Christian Church SE ¼ of Section 5 PETITIONER: Whorley Storage LLC INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP BACKGROUND PC 030-2020 The petitioner has submitted for a conceptual review BSO/CUG discussion for a new indoor/outdoor storage facility on a vacant property along the east side of Racine Avenue between Starz Dance and Fox River Christian Church. The property that the applicant is looking to purchase and develop the mini-storage units on what would be about 1.3 acres of the existing 3.1 acre parcel. The potential storage facility would be located on the eastern, or back portion of the lot. The petitioner is requesting conceptual approval/discussion to get comments from the Planning Commission regarding the proposal. The petitioner will be present at the meeting to further explain the rezoning and to answer any questions. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 030-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the area for commercial uses. The proposed concept is consistent with the Plan, if approved. Zoning: The property is zoned B-2 – General Business District. Mini-storage uses are allowable in this district with the approval of a Conditional Use Grant (CUG). DISCUSSION PC 030-2020 The overall plan for the development on this lot would be to initially build one building in the northeast corner of the site near the entrance drive with the ability to build six additional buildings as demand is needed for a total buildout of seven storage buildings. There would be both indoor and outdoor storage on the property. Buildings The first building would be 40’ x 40’ and would include indoor storage and an office to serve the entire site. Five of the future buildings would be the same size (40’ x 40’) with one building being 40’ x 80’ in size. All of the buildings will be 17’ tall at the front and slope back to 14’ at the rear. The buildings would be clad with tan steel siding with brown doors and a brown steel roof. An example of Page 1 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 83 the exterior appearance is included in the submittal. Site Access to the site is gained via two access easements off of Racine Ave. and Tans Dr., which were created when the lots were previously split. The new proposed portion of the site would have an asphalt driveway off of this easement leading to the site. The interior of the site would consist of crushed rock with concrete slabs below the buildings. A solid six foot (6’) privacy fence would surround the entire storage and building area. This would also include a solid gate for entry to the site. Stormwater management is proposed by utilizing the existing stormwater retention basin on the Starz Dance property via the Drainage and Storm Water Management Easement established with the previously approved Certified Survey Map. The applicant has discussed having an analysis done on the existing stormwater retention area and making expansions/modifications to accommodate the stormwater management for this proposal. Additionally, the Storm Water Management Easement extends along the southern 25’ of this property. The applicant should be aware that these easements are to remain in open space to accommodate the utilities and stormwater. The current concept shows an encroachment in to this easement, which is not typically allowed. A few items that the Plan Commission and/or the applicant may want to think about now or into the future are as follows:  Architectural details need to be developed so we can determine how this project would fit within the neighborhood and with the Racine Avenue Gateway Design Guide and the General Design Guide requirements. Typically commercial buildings in commercially zoned area are required to have at least 50% masonry and 4-sides architecture. The currently proposed buildings do not have much architectural details and/or character. Also, the City has not recently allowed any full metal commercial buildings in the City.  The site is proposed as crushed rock. Typically a solid surface, such as concrete or asphalt, would be required for the full site. This is identified in the code and it help keep dust down and is easier to mark for parking/storage locations.  Further examination of any possible stormwater management requirements that will be required for this site. This would need to be reviewed by Engineering staff if this project were to proceed further.  Details relating to the exact site layout including the areas designated for outdoor storage would need to be examined to make sure all driveways and fire lane/fire streets are at the proper required widths. We would not want to allow random storage throughout the site as that could create safety issues relating to access.  How the overall use may or may not affect the neighborhood, considering there is a church and dance studio on either side of this and homes to the east?  How items such as lighting, landscaping, signage, screening, etc. will be proposed/installed?  How will screening, landscaping, and any other concerns be addressed in between phases, before the full build out is completed?  How much of the site would be used for outdoor storage and what type of storage would exactly be stored there, as this could require a different type of screening and/or more robust screening?  Since there is a portion of this site that is a former landfill, the owner should talk with the DNR relating to any concerns or conditions they may have relating to any development of this site. The City would need written correspondence identifying that this use would be allowed, as proposed.  Since this site is located on a high portion of the site, the items proposed on it will appear to be perched up. As such, this could be a concern as it relates to the building design, placement, and/or storage uses.  How would exactly would this lot be split since there is no road frontage, which is normally required per code for any lot in a land division? The owner mentions a commercial condo, but this would need to be looked at further to see if it is a valid option or not.  As is noted above, this property is located within a design district and as such, the Plan Commission should look to determine if this type of use, building design and outdoor storage are Page 2 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 84 a good fit for this area. DIRECTION PC 030-2020 The petitioner and representatives will be present on the meeting to further explain the project and to answer any questions. No formal approval or denial will be given at this meeting and no guarantees can be made. This conceptual approval is intended to solicit comments, suggestions, and ideas. If the petitioner would like to take the next step and eventually apply for the suggested review process, the comments received at this meeting must be addressed as part of the formal submittal. Page 3 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 85 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0150300 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapPC 030-2020 Whorley StorageVacant / Racine Avenue JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 4/27/2020 Page 4 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 86 PROPOSED GRAVEL PARKING LOT 5482 S. WESTRIDGE DRIVE NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (262) 402-5040 NO . RE V I S I O N S BY D A T E DESIGNED DRAWN INITIALS DATE 03/06/20 SHEET NO. OF 03/06/20SAB SAB SCALE 0 20' PROJECT NO. Page 5 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 87 Proposal for Whorley Storage LLC to purchase and build an indoor/outdoor storage facility at W195 S6842 Racine Ave. Whorley Storage is owned and operated by Mark Whorley. Mark and his wife Laurie have been residents in Muskego for over 12 years. Mark has taken an active role in local communities. In the past Mark served on the Board of the Muskego Lakes Land Conservancy. Mark is currently on the Board of the Tichigan Lakes Lions Club. Laurie is a Nurse Practitioner and currently practices at ProHealth Care in Muskego. Mark has built a successful self-storage facility in Waterford, which includes 55 indoor storage units. This storage facility specializes in extra-large storage units to accommodate RV’s, Travel Trailers and Boats. There is a high demand for these types of storage units in our area due to the large number of lakes. The Waterford facility runs at 100% capacity year round. Whorley Storage LLC is a proud member of the Wisconsin Self Storage Association. We pride ourselves on customer service, and have a 5 star rating on Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Yelp. Please feel free to visit the Whorley Storage LLC website at www.whorleystorage.com for more information about the Waterford facility. Page 6 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 88 At the Waterford storage facility I receive more requests than I can handle for indoor Boat and RV storage, and we receive a high volume off calls for outdoor boat, RV, trailer and car storage. Based on this unmet need, I have been looking to open a second facility, which can accommodate indoor and outdoor storage. I am proposing the purchase of approx. 1.3 acres of property located at W195 S6842 Racine Ave. from Lynch and Associates. Tim Lynch and his partners currently own the property, and this particular section of the property is located directly over the old Muskego dump site. Based on the properties history and the soil conditions, there are very few things that could be built on this site, an indoor/outdoor storage facility would be possible. Both Tim and I have had conversations with the Muskego City Planners and feel we can meet all City requirements. This property will be purchased as a land condominium and Whorley Storage LLC will have over 60 ft. of frontage on Racine Ave. through this land condominium purchase. Page 7 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 89 This property has deeded easement access off of both Racine Ave. and Tans Dr. through the outer driveway of the Fox River Church at S67 W19491 Tans. We are proposing to add a driveway and culvert to access the property off the existing easement. This driveway will be asphalt. We are proposing to line the entire parking lot and storage building area with a 6’ high tan solid PVC fence, as seen below. There will be a mechanical locking security gate (controlled by a keypad) at the top of the driveway. This gate will also be solid, to provide screening of the property from Tans Dr. Page 8 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 90 Below are rendering of how the site will look once complete: View from Racine Ave. View from Tans Dr. Page 9 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 91 The proposed site plan is below. This plan has been professionally prepared by Lynch and Associates. A PDF of the site plan is also attached, which will allow for close up viewing of the plan. We are proposing that the parking area be crushed stone to a depth of 5”. Stone will make an idea surface for outdoor storage, as it allows for traction during winter. Stone will also meet DNR requirements, as this is a capped dump site and certain rules must be followed to build on this site. The entire parking lot will drain to the South where a manhole will drain all water to the existing storm water storage pond. The pond size may need to be expanded slightly to accommodate the extra impervious surface created. We are proposing in total that 7 buildings be built around the entire perimeter of the site. These buildings will be built over 4” of flat fiber reinforced concrete slab. 6 of the buildings will be 40’x40’ and the remaining building will be 30’x70’. All Page 10 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 92 building will be approx. 17’ high at the front and 14’ high at rear. All buildings will have single slope roofs and will be guttered in the back. All water from buildings will flow to underground storm water piping and into the storm water pond. All of these buildings are designed at this height to accommodate multiple 14’ high 12’ wide overhead sectional doors, which are required for RVs. The buildings will be tan steel sided with brown sectional doors and brown steel roofs. These buildings will match Whorley Storage LLC Waterford existing colors. We are proposing to build these buildings as demand for indoor storage is needed, and only one building is expected to be built in 2020. This first building will house the electric need for the entire site and will house the site’s office, gate and security camera system. All parking area lights will face into the center of the parking area and once completely built all parking lighting will be obscured by buildings and very little light should be seen from Racine Ave. or tans Dr. There will be a small amount of light seen over side access doors, as man doors are required to meet code and they require a dusk to dawn light. Page 11 of 11 PC 030-2020 Packet Page 93 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 031-2020 For the meeting of: May 5, 2020 REQUEST: Building Site and Operation Plan Amendment for Interstate Partners LLC. S64 W15591 Commerce Center Parkway / Tax Key No. 2116.997.008 NW ¼ of Section 2 PETITIONER: Interstate Partners/Commerce Center Industrial Land LLC. INTRODUCED: May 5, 2020 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 031-2020 The petitioner, Interstate Partners, is requesting a Building Site and Operation Plan Amendment (BSO) for approval of the landscaping plan as required in Resolution PC 014-2019 to ensure the landscaping will be sufficient related to the screening the development from the adjacent residential uses as well as the site landscaping around the new 126,000 square foot business/industrial spec building in the Commerce Center East development along Commerce Center Parkway. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 031-2020 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the areas for business park use. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned BP-3 Business Park District and the proposed use is allowed by right subject to the approval of a Building, Site, and Operation Plan. Park and Conservation Plan: No park acquisitions or conservation areas are proposed in this area. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. DISCUSSION PC 031-2020 As stated above, Plan Commission approval of the landscaping is required as pursuant to Resolution PC 014-2019. At that time the BSO was approved for the development of the 126,000 square foot spec building. During that approval, staff thought the effective height of the berm was compromised due to the amount of fill that was added to the site and that there was not sufficient landscaping to screen from the neighbors to the east due to the height of the spec building. The applicant requested that they be able to add landscaping to the berm rather than adding height to the existing berm. The applicant originally submitted a landscaping plan with six (6) new spruce trees that would be six feet (6’) tall at planting. Staff believed this to be inadequate due to the effective height being six feet in height on the berm. The applicant has since submitted a revised landscaping plan that shows 13 trees all at eight (8) feet in height at the time of planting. The plantings are proposed in locations that fill gaps between existing trees to screen the building from neighbors. In addition to the landscaping on the berm, a large transformer was moved in front of the building in a landscape island. Nine switch grass plantings are located on the visible side of the mechanical unit, which are not adequate for screening. As identified in the approval of the BSO in Resolution PC 014- Page 1 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 94 2019, all rooftop and ground mechanicals must be screened from view. Screening of mechanical units such as this are typically screened with 6’ arborvitae plantings surrounding the unit. Staff recognizes that switch grass plantings will not sufficiently screen the unit from view. Thus, additional landscaping is required to screen the mechanical unit. The following is also part of the Plan Commission resolution: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The transformer will need to be screened with densely spaced 6’ arborvitae, or similar, to ensure adequate screening on the west, north and east sides and the south side should contain the door of the transformer and can have smaller scale screening plantings due to the required door access. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All roof top and ground mechanicals (including HVAC devices, electrical transformers, etc.) must be screened from view and/or incorporated into the design of the site/structure (screening, etc.) and must be approved by the Planning Division before the issuance of building permits and Business Registration approvals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 031-2020 Approval of Resolution PC 031-2020 Page 2 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 95 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0280560 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 031-2020 Interstate PartnersS64 W15591 Commerce Center Parkway JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S CO L L E G E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 4/27/2020 Page 3 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 96 RESOLUTION #P.C. 031-2020 APPROVAL OF A BUILDING SITE AND OPERATION PLAN AMENDMENT FOR INTERSTATE PARTNERS/COMMERCE CENTER INDUSTRIAL LAND LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 2 (S64 W15591 COMMERCE CENTER PARKWAY / TAX KEY NO. 2166.997.008) WHEREAS, Landscaping plans were submitted by Interstate Partners/Commerce Center Industrial Land LLC. for approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for a property located in the NW ¼ of Section 2 (S64 W15591 Commerce Center Parkway / Tax Key No. 2166.997.008), and WHEREAS, The property is zoned BP-3, Business Park District, and WHEREAS, The 2020 Plan Depicts the area for Business Park uses and the proposal is consistent with the plan, and WHEREAS, The submittal includes a narrative and various version of the landscape plans, and WHEREAS, Approval of the berm landscaping plan is required from the BSO approval of Resolution PC 014-2019, and WHEREAS, There is landscaped berm on the east side of this property that was previously installed to help screen the overall Commerce Center development from the neighbors to the east, and WHEREAS, The original landscape included as part of PC 014-2019 had various areas of gaps on the berm where there was not adequate landscape screening, and WHEREAS, The applicant then submitted a landscaping plan for staff review with six (6) new spruce trees that would be six feet (6’) tall at planting, and WHEREAS, After review of said plan noted above, a further revised landscape plan was submitted that shows 13 trees all at eight (8’) feet in height at the time of planting , and WHEREAS, A large transformer unit was also relocated on site to a location in front of the building in a landscape island and it is proposed to be screened with landscaping that does not do an adequate job of screening, and WHEREAS, Additional landscaping is required to screen the transformer unit. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of a Building, Site, and Operation Plan Amendment for Interstate Partners/Commerce Center Industrial Lands LLC. for the property located in the NW ¼ of Section 2 (S64 W15591 Commerce Center Parkway / Tax Key No. 2166.997.008). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All conditions of approval from Resolution PC 014-2019 remain effective. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The landscaping plan submitted with 13 separate plantings at eight (8’) feet in height is sufficient to fill gaps within the existing trees, while noting that the building will never be 100% screened due to its height and location. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The transformer will need to be screened with densely spaced 6’ arborvitae, or similar, to ensure adequate screening on the west, north and east sides and the south side should contain the door of the transformer and can have smaller scale screening plantings due to the required door access. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All roof top and ground mechanicals (including HVAC devices, electrical transformers, etc.) must be screened from view and/or incorporated into the design of the site/structure (screening, etc.) and must be approved by the Planning Division before the issuance of building permits and Business Registration approvals. Page 4 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 97 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: May 5, 2020 ATTEST: Adam Trzebiatowski AICP, Planning Manager Page 5 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 98 Page 6 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 99 Page 7 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 100 Page 8 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 101 Page 9 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 102 Page 10 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 103 Page 11 of 11 RESOLUTION PC 031-2020 Packet Page 104