COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Packet - 4/10/2018
CITY OF MUSKEGO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
April 10, 2018
6:30 PM
City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February 13 and March 13, 2018
NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion Regarding the Sign Ordinance - Scoreboards (Ald. Kubacki)
COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW
ADJOURNMENT
Possible reconvening of the Committee of the Whole immediately following Common Council
Meeting of the same date to continue work on agenda items
NOTICE
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF
THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION
WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL
BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE.
ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED
INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS
SERVICE, MUSKEGO CITY HALL, (262) 679-4100.
Unapproved
CITY OF MUSKEGO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES
February 13, 2018
6:00 PM
City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Aldermen Wolfe, Hammel, Borgman, Kapusta, Engelhardt and Madden. Also
present: City Attorney Warchol, Public Works and Development Director Kroeger, Recreation
Manager Dunn, IT Director Loudon, Technician Kierzek and Deputy Clerk Blenski. Absent:
Alderman Kubacki.
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
The Deputy Clerk stated that the meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting
law.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES – January 23, 2018
Alderman Madden made a motion to approve. Alderman Wolfe seconded; motion
carried.
NEW BUSINESS
Road Bonds for Little Muskego Lake Private Dredging Projects
Director Kroeger presented a synopsis of what transpired in the last several months. In
November, Integrated Lakes Management (ILM/Rob) contacted the City regarding doing some
private dredging projects on Little Muskego Lake. Discussions took place with the contractor;
the primary concern is that the contractor will have to access City property to haul and
transport the dredge material from the private properties. Mr. Kroeger noted that the
majority of the roads that would be used were just recently redone. Approximately $828,000
was spent in the last three years on roads that would be part of the dredging project.
Discussion with ILM continued; the City indicated what the contractor needed to submit. The
contractor submitted an Agreement between ILM and the City in addition to four haul routes for
review on December 18, 2017. He did indicate to Director Kroeger that dredging projects are
typically planned over a five-year period. Additional haul routes were submitted in January
with the City again continuing to work with the contractor to keep the process moving forward.
On January 10, the City sent the contractor the Attorney's comments and insurance
requirements. The amount of a road bond was also being discussed. The contractor intended
to start the first dredging site at the end of January. Mr. Kroeger noted that would have
involved approximately 175 truckloads and 55,000 lbs. of dredge material, one way from one
access point.
Director Kroeger stated that all the necessary documents appeared to be in order and he was
confident the contractor could still start at the end of January with the understanding that the
Common Council had to approve the Agreement on February 13, 2018. The contractor
continued to send additional haul routes to the City. It was determined that a $2.75 million
dollar bond would be required. This amount reflects a reduction by Director Kroeger. On
February 6, the contractor said he was cancelling because he was only prepared to post a
$10,000 to $20,000 bond. Mr. Kroeger stated that the City did provide some options to ILM,
such as doing the projects in phases. Director Kroeger next provided some frequently asked
questions and answers.
City Attorney Warchol stated when dealing with contracts, it is all about risk. His job is to
protect the City in the best way. He explained the difference between a bond and a letter of
credit. When the City enters into an agreement with a developer, a letter of credit is always
provided at a cost of 120% of the total project. The City has been very proactive to protect its
roads. The Police Department has a program in place to monitor trucking weight limits.
Violators have been cited. Cases have been prosecuted and fines assessed.
Alderman Borgman – He understands the need to protect the City roads; however, the bond
amount is excessive and unprecedented. The City is being overprotective and making any
improvement projects impossible.
Alderman Wolfe – He believes the City made every effort to work with the contractor in a very
short timeframe. There should have been a plan in place; the Lake District should have been
involved. No one on the Committee is against the dredging. The contractor decided to back
out.
Alderman Madden – This is all a result of no planning beginning with the drawdown.
Mayor Chiaverotti – This type of project is typically done under the umbrella of the Lake
District; there is one permit. Planning is done so the bond amount is known well in advance. If
the contractor believes the roads will not be damaged, the bond should not be an issue. If the
roads are damaged, the City could potentially have to borrow to repair them. This will impact
all the taxpayers. The request of the Lake District for the drawdown was to freeze out Starry
Stonewort. The dredging came as an afterthought. It presents a great opportunity, but should
have been planned.
Alderman Kapusta requested to open the floor for public comment. There was no objection.
Dredging Contractor (ILM) – State he has been doing this for 20 years. The bond amount
being required is three to four times the total cost of the project. Clarification is also needed to
define what is cause for forfeiture. He decided to walk away from the project because the
bond amount could not be negotiated to be financially prudent. The $20,000 is the typical
amount of the bond that he posts. He is not trying to alleviate any responsibility. He agreed to
provide a bond in the amount of 10% or $100,000.
It was determined that the Committee of the Whole meeting would adjourn and reconvene
following the Common Council meeting. However, the Committee would hear from those
individuals who registered to speak first.
The following individuals spoke in favor of the project:
Darren Weber
Jon Lindrus
Maria Stone
Lloyd Pickart
Don Conner
Lisa Niles
Andrew Haugen
Alderman Wolfe made a motion to adjourn and reconvene after the Common Council
meeting. Alderman Hammel seconded; motion carried.
(The Common Council meeting was held.)
Mayor Chiaverotti reconvened the Committee of the Whole at 8:13 p.m.
Discussion continued. Alderman Borgman made a recommendation to accept a $100,000
sliding bond. The consensus: 4 in favor with Aldermen Hammel, Borgman, Kapusta
and Engelhardt in agreement and Aldermen Wolfe and Madden against. It was clarified
that the issue would be on the Common Council agenda in two weeks.
The contractor noted that he needs the bond criteria. Director Kroeger asked if the contractor
should get core samples or not? The response of the Committee was no.
Little Muskego Lake Drawdown Update
Director Kroeger gave a brief update on the drawdown. The drawdown pipe is still open. He
plans to shut it down in April. The lake level filling up is dependent on nature.
Discuss Little Muskego Lake District Request - Launch Fees
City Attorney Warchol stated a request was received from the Little Muskego Lake District to
increase the launch fees as follows:
Daily Rate: Increase from $7.00 to $10.00
Resident Seasonal Pass: Increase from $42.00 to $50.00
Non-Resident Seasonal Pass Increase from $63.00 to $80.00
Remove Senior Discount
The DNR regulates the maximum amount of fees that can be charged for a boat launch. The
collected fees can only be used for the operation and maintenance of the boat launch facilities.
The maximum base fee is $8.00. However, the amount can be increased for launches that
provide restrooms and attendants. The Mayor stated that pay stations will be installed soon,
which will eliminate the need for an attendant.
In addition, all the public launches do not have restrooms so there could potentially be different
fees depending on the launch. That was viewed as a negative.
Several Aldermen asked why the fees were proposed to be raised. Attorney Warchol stated
that the reason the Little Muskego Lake District gave for the increase was to decrease the use
of the boat launch facility and limit the density of boats on the lake. As stated earlier, the DNR
would not accept that reason. Alderman Borgman proposed to leave the fees status quo.
Following discussion, the majority of the Committee agreed that the fees should remain as is.
As a representative on the Lake District, Alderman Engelhardt did not agree.
Discuss Rental of City Facility Storage Areas
Director Kroeger noted that several leases for City facilities will expire soon. In some cases, a
lease is not even in place. Prime City space is being utilized by organizations, such as the
Boxhorn Gun Club, the Festival Committee (Veteran's) and the Water Bugs (Idle Isle). He is
looking for direction on how the City wants to move forward. These are valuable City assets.
Staff researched the cost to rent space in today's market. At Idle Isle, for example, the Water
Bugs utilize all of the available space. Ms. Dunn stated the City would need one of the front
storage units for the storage of water equipment that was recently purchased for rental
purposes. The consensus was to have Attorney Warchol and Director Kroeger create new
leases for the existing occupants to reflect rental costs at fair market value.
ADJOURNMENT
Alderman Engelhardt made a motion to adjourn at 9:06 p.m. Alderman Madden
seconded; motion carried.
Minutes taken and transcribed by Jill Blenski, Deputy Clerk.
Unapproved
CITY OF MUSKEGO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES
March 13, 2018
6:30 PM
City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 6:42 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Aldermen Wolfe, Borgman, Kapusta, Engelhardt, Kubacki and Madden. Also
present: City Attorney Warchol, Public Works and Development Director Kroeger and Deputy
Clerk Blenski. Alderman Hammel arrived at 6:58 p.m.
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
The Deputy Clerk stated that the meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting
law.
NEW BUSINESS
Discussion Regarding Prairie Meadows Retention Pond Maintenance Agreement with
the City of Muskego and Similar Retention Pond Maintenance Agreements Regarding
Various Other Subdivisions
City Attorney Warchol stated several old Retention Pond Maintenance Agreements recently
came to his attention. The one for Prairie Meadows is dated February, 2003. The agreements
are for the maintenance of subdivision retention ponds. The agreements state that the
Homeowners' Associations own the ponds and maintain them. However, they also indicate
that the City will drawdown the ponds on an annual basis to look for sediment and possibly
lower the level. The Subdivider paid the City $2,000 for the first f ive years of doing the
drawdowns. After the fifth year, the Homeowner's Association pays for the drawdown with the
City still being responsible to do it. It was discovered that the City is holding approximately
$85,000 for various subdivisions to do the drawdowns. The drawdowns were never done.
Director Kroeger confirmed that there is no need to do them. He also confirmed that as of
three or four years ago, this language is no longer used in any agreement.
Attorney Warchol stated that now the issue is what should be done with the money. One
Developer did contact the City and requested a refund. The original agreements were
recorded so new agreements would have to be executed. The problem is locating the original
individuals who paid the City for the drawdowns. Director Kroeger stated this is a unique
situation; every item will have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In some cases, the
Subdivider and/or Homeowner's Association may no longer be in existence. Attorney Warchol
and Director Kroeger are looking for direction on how to proceed.
(Alderman Hammel arrived at 6:58 p.m.)
Alderman Kubacki suggested that the City offer to do the drawdowns.
Mayor summarized the direction for Attorney Warchol and Director Kroeger: They will begin
the process of reaching out to any individual on the list who could readily be contacted. If new
agreements are required, the attorney will bring forward in the future.
ADJOURNMENT
Alderman Wolfe made a motion to adjourn at 7:02 p.m. Alderman Kapusta seconded;
motion carried.
Minutes taken and transcribed by Jill Blenski, Deputy Clerk.