Loading...
Public Works Committee Packet - 1/23/2017 CITY OF MUSKEGO PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA January 23, 2017 5:00 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE APPROVAL OF MINUTES HELD DECEMBER 19, 2016. STATUS OF PROJECTS Discussion update. No formal action may be taken on any of the following: 1. Moorland Road Reconstruction UNFINISHED BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: 1. Review Request for Municipal Water for New Middle School by Muskego Norway School District NEW BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: 1. Request for Right-of-Way Vacation adjacent to Edgewater Heights 2. Approval of 2017 Road Program 3. Approval of Heritage Senior Campus Water Main Improvements NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE (The following items have been placed on file for staff review. Upon completion of review, staff will submit a supplement detailing options and possible course of action to committee members.) COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS SERVICE, CONTACT MUSKEGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, (262) 679-4136. Unapproved CITY OF MUSKEGO PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 19, 2016 4:45 PM Aldermen’s Room – Upper Level of City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER Alderman Kubacki called the meeting to order at 4:45 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Alderman Kevin Kubacki, Alderman Eileen Madden Not Present: Alderman Tom Kapusta Guests: City Engineer Mike Paulos, City Attorney Jeff Warchol, David Simpson STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting laws. APPROVAL OF MINUTES HELD November 21, 2016 Alderman Madden made a motion to approve the MINUTES HELD November 21, 2016. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion Passed 2 in favor. STATUS OF PROJECTS Discussion update. No formal action may be taken on any of the following: Moorland Road Reconstruction Edgewater Heights Subdivision Woods Road Emergency Culvert Replacement UNFINISHED BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: Review Request for Public Improvements to be Required as part of the Potential Land Division of MSK2208-997-001. Alderman Madden made a motion to approve a Two Lot Land Division of MSK2208- 997-001 with the owner providing the water connection, via a hook up to the City watermain in McShane Drive for Lot 1, as depicted on Owner's draft of Certified Survey Map presented to the Committee and bordering McShane Drive and Nursery Court. A recommendation was made for engineering to begin research on a City Ordinance regarding water connection for proposed Lot Divisions. Alderman Kubacki seconded. Motion Passed 2 in favor. NEW BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: Discussion on adjusting January meeting from January 16th to the 23rd. NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE (The following items have been placed on file for staff review. Upon completion of review, staff will submit a supplement detailing options and possible course of action to committee members.) COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW ADJOURNMENT Alderman Kubacki made a motion to ADJOURN at 5:11 PM. Alderman Madden seconded. Motion Passed 2 in favor. Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works Committee To: Public Works Committee From: Michael N. Paulos, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: Review Request by Muskego-Norway school District for New Middle School Date: November 15, 2016 The Muskego Norway School District is requesting approval for a municipal water connection for the proposed new Middle School located at W124 S8009 North Cape Road, just south of the Muskego recreational Trail and Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community. The proposed connection point is the existing 8-inch, dead end water main at Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community. A duplex booster station and separate fire pump are being considered for the school. Recommendation for Action by Committee: Recommend that the proposed water main be connected to the municipal water system at Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community as proposed as well as extending the proposed water main south and tie into the existing water distribution system thereby creating a truly looped system to greatly increase system pressure, supply and fire protection reliability. The water main loop connection concept was discussed with the development team in April with possible routes to consider. Wednesday | November 9, 2016 City of Muskego, Public Works Committee W182 S8200 Racine Avenue Muskego, WI 53150 Re: Muskego-Norway School District Request for Municipal Water for New Middle School Dear Public Works Committee: The Muskego-Norway School District is requesting approval from the City of Muskego’s Public Works Committee to provide a municipal water connection for the proposed New Middle School project that was approved by public referendum on April 5, 2016. The New Middle School site is located at W124 S8009 North Cape Road in Muskego, just south of the Muskego Recreational Trail and Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community. The proposed route for the new water service is to connect to the existing 8 inch water main at Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community at a single point with a new 8 inch water main running south across the Muskego Recreational Trail to the New Middle School site. An 8 inch water main loop would then be created around the New Middle School building. Please reference the attached overall site plan of the New Middle School, sheet C1.2, which shows the proposed route. The Muskego-Norway School District has been in contact with Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community regarding the easement needed to make this proposed water service connection possible and will continue to coordinate with them on the route should this proposal be approved. Several options for providing water to the New Middle School have been studied, including through meetings with the City of Muskego. In addition to the immediate impact on the New Middle School project, both the City’s long term plan and the School District’s long term plan were taken into consideration. Additional information is available upon request. The City of Muskego provided preliminary estimates for the water capacity to the New Middle School based on the proposed connection and route outlined above. The estimated available fire flow is approximately 1,500 GPM, and the estimated pressure is approximately 20 PSI. Muermann Engineering has provided Muskego-Norway School District with estimates of the water demand for the New Middle School. The peak load is estimated to be approximately 197 GPM with an anticipated service load of 118 GPM. However, the estimated 20 PSI water pressure is too low, so a duplex booster pump is being proposed to increase the pressure for the domestic water demand. A separate fire pump is also being proposed to increase the pressure for the fire protection system. Muermann Engineering estimates, based on preliminary calculations, that the 1,500 GPM fire flow may be sufficient for the New Middle School; however, if this proposal is approved additional engineering will be done to confirm that is the case, which the School District will coordinate with the City of Muskego. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal to provide municipal water for the Muskego-Norway School District’s New Middle School. Sincerely, Muskego-Norway School District Jeremiah Johnson, SHRM-CP, CSRM Director of Operations | Safety Coordinator | Muskego-Norway School District Enclosure: New Middle School Site Plan cc: Kathy Chiaverotti, Mayor, City of Muskego Scott Kloskowski, Utilities Superintendent, City of Muskego Jeff Muenkel, Director of Community Development, City of Muskego Mike Paulos, Graef Rick Petfalski, School Board President, Muskego-Norway School District Matt Wolfert, President, Bray Architects 1 Heather Owen From:Heather Owen Sent:Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:04 PM To:Heather Owen Subject:FW: Permitting Attachments:Sanitary Asbuilt.pdf; ATT00001.htm; Water Extension Options.pdf; ATT00002.htm From: David Simpson [mailto:dsimpson@cityofmuskego.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:43 PM To: Joe.Schmidt@cgschmidt.com; jeremiah.johnson@muskegonorway.org Cc: julie.kelly@muskegonorway.org; kelly.thompson@muskegonorway.org; Jeffrey Muenkel; mhacker@brayarch.com; Dan.Duerrwaechter@cgschmidt.com; Scott Kloskowski Subject: RE: Permitting Hi Joe- I have attached the sanitary asbuilt as well as a sketch of the two routes we think would be most viable for the water main loop connection. You may also want to start reaching out to Franklin to begin discussions on what their driveway entrance requirements will be. Thanks, Dave David Simpson, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Muskego Direct (262) 679-5686   This message originates from David Simpson.  It contains information that may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual named above.  It is prohibited for anyone to  disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message without permission, except as allowed by Wisconsin Public Records Laws.  If this message is sent to a quorum of a governmental  body, my intent is the same as though it were sent by regular mail and further distribution is prohibited.  All personal messages express views solely of the sender, which are not attributed to  the municipality I represent, and may not be copied or distributed without this disclaimer. From: Joe.Schmidt@cgschmidt.com [mailto:Joe.Schmidt@cgschmidt.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 9:48 PM To: David Simpson; jeremiah.johnson@muskegonorway.org Cc: julie.kelly@muskegonorway.org; kelly.thompson@muskegonorway.org; Jeffrey Muenkel; mhacker@brayarch.com; Dan.Duerrwaechter@cgschmidt.com Subject: RE: Permitting Dave,    Thank you for all the information.  I look forward to our upcoming discussions.   If there is information from your GIS system to begin looking at the building service utilities that you can share that  would be very helpful for our team.     Joseph Schmidt, PE  Preconstruction Manager  CG SCHMIDT INC.  11777 West Lake Park Drive  Milwaukee, WI 53224  Direct: (414) 577‐1147  Fax: (414) 577‐1155  Cell Phone (414) 758‐7333  2 Creating Exceptional Facilities that Improve the Lives of Others   From: David Simpson [mailto:DSimpson@cityofmuskego.org] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 8:04 AM To: Jeremiah Johnson Cc: Julie Kelly; Kelly Thompson; Schmidt, Joe; Jeffrey Muenkel Subject: RE: Permitting Jeremiah- We are always willing to meet and discuss project requirements so feel free to let us know when you are ready to meet. I would imagine the biggest topic from the Engineering end of things will be how to get water service to the new school as well as access issues. I am sure there will be other questions relating to storm water management as well. Thanks, Dave David Simpson, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Muskego Direct (262) 679-5686   This message originates from David Simpson.  It contains information that may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual named above.  It is prohibited for anyone to  disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message without permission, except as allowed by Wisconsin Public Records Laws.  If this message is sent to a quorum of a governmental  body, my intent is the same as though it were sent by regular mail and further distribution is prohibited.  All personal messages express views solely of the sender, which are not attributed to  the municipality I represent, and may not be copied or distributed without this disclaimer. From: David Simpson Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 3:47 PM To: 'Jeremiah Johnson' Cc: Julie Kelly; Kelly Thompson; joe.schmidt; Jeffrey Muenkel Subject: RE: Permitting Jeremiah- Jeff Muenkel is in charge of Building Inspection so I will let him answer your questions. I have copied him on this email. I will be involved with your approval process from the Engineering side of things and Jeff will handle all Planning and Building items. I am sure we can assist in any way you might need when working through the approval processes. Thanks, Dave David Simpson, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Muskego Direct (262) 679-5686   This message originates from David Simpson.  It contains information that may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual named above.  It is prohibited for anyone to  disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message without permission, except as allowed by Wisconsin Public Records Laws.  If this message is sent to a quorum of a governmental  body, my intent is the same as though it were sent by regular mail and further distribution is prohibited.  All personal messages express views solely of the sender, which are not attributed to  the municipality I represent, and may not be copied or distributed without this disclaimer. From: Jeremiah Johnson [mailto:jeremiah.johnson@muskegonorway.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 3:33 PM To: David Simpson Cc: Julie Kelly; Kelly Thompson; joe.schmidt Subject: Permitting Hi Dave- I understand this will need a greater level of discussion, but we have begun to map out our building plans and wondered if we could work out an arrangement for permitting costs. Some have noted that the City has worked on a time and material basis for permitting during past District projects? Is that something we could come 3 around in the coming month? Looking forward to all of the work will we be doing with you in the coming year! -- Jeremiah Johnson SHRM-CP, CSRM Buildings & Grounds Supervisor | Safety Coordinator | Muskego-Norway School District | 262.971.1807 258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   1 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  MEMO   TO:  Mike Paulos, P.E., Director of Public Works, City of Muskego  FROM:  Scott Beduhn, P.E., Senior Project Manager, Ruekert & Mielke, Inc.  DATE:  January 13, 2016  SUBJECT:  New Middle School Evaluation  The Muskego Norway School District is planning to construct a new middle school on district owned land  within the City of Muskego.  The new school will be located east of Durham Drive and south of McShane  Drive along the eastern municipal boundary.  Figure 1 illustrates the general location of the proposed  school.  Being within the City of Muskego the school will be served with municipal water.  This technical  Figure 1 TUDOR OAKS SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY 258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   2 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  memo summarizes the results of an evaluation regarding the water system improvements necessary to  adequately serve the school’s domestic and fire protection requirements.  As can be seen in Figure 1, the proposed school is located within an area of limited existing water  system infrastructure.  To serve the needs of the school, the school district is proposing to extend water  service from the Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community located north of the school site. City staff have  asked Ruekert & Mielke, Inc. (R/M) to evaluate the capacity of the school district’s proposed water  system improvements.  Specifically, the scope of work is to evaluate the following:  1. Determine the flows and pressure available at the New Middle School with the single point of  connection to the water main on the Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community property to  determine if the fire flows available will be sufficient for the fire protection at the new middle  school.  2. Determine the flows and pressure available at the New Middle School with the full loop  connecting to two different mains, Tudor Oaks Senior Living Community and along Hi View Drive  to connect at Durham Drive  If needed, the evaluation is also intended to identify if additional water system improvements may be  necessary to adequately serve the proposed school.    There are two basic criteria utilized to establish capacity. The first is the system’s ability to provide  adequate pressure under normal usage conditions and the second is the system’s ability to provide the  anticipated level of fire protection.  Domestic demand was provided by representatives for the school  district and is anticipated to be 118 gallons per minute (gpm) under average conditions and 197 gpm  under peak conditions.   Fire protection needs can vary significantly from structure to structure and are calculated based upon  numerous factors including, type of building construction, building occupancy and use, building height  and the proximity of the building to other structures.  Due to the number of factors that influence a  building’s fire protection need, the most feasible means to determining a buildings fire protection need  is to consult with the local fire department.  The following fire protection requirements were provided  by representatives of the school district after consultation with the school’s fire system designer and  local fire department:  1. The school will be equipped with an internal sprinkler system which will designed to deliver  1,500 gpm at a minimum pressure of 50 pounds per square inch (psi). The delivery rate includes  both the sprinklers and an internal hose allowance.  2. The fire department has determined the need for an external hose allowance of 1,250 gpm at a  residual pressure of 20 psi.  3. The total fire protection need is equivalent to the sum of the sprinkler system and the external  hose allowance for a total of 2,750 gpm.    258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   3 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  Utilizing the City of Muskego’s existing water system computer model, a representation of the proposed  water system extension to serve the proposed school was added.  The model representation is shown in  Figure 2. The model was then run to calculate both pressure and flow characteristics using the demands  identified above.  The first scenario was to identify the average and peak hour pressure with the  development in place.  Based upon the model results it is estimated that the pressure will be  approximately 55 to 60 psi at the proposed connection to the school. (The pressure will vary slightly  based upon the actual demand and conditions of operation).    The second scenario was to identify the availability of fire protection.  As identified above, there are two  components of fire protection that need to be evaluated.  The first component is the internal sprinkler  system and the second is the external hose allowance requested by the fire department.  While the  external hose allowance does not have a minimum required operating pressure, the sprinkler system  does.  The fire sprinkler’s minimum operating pressure, as stated above, is understood to be 50 psi.   Regardless of the component of fire protection, the current regulatory requirements for minimum  allowable system pressure must be met.  The current minimum allowable water system pressure during  an emergency (fire) condition is 20 psi.  The evaluation of fire protection availability was performed utilizing three individual analyses as follows:  1. The fire sprinkler in operation without the external hose allowance.  2. The external hose allowance without the sprinkler system.  3. Both components of fire protection simultaneously.  Existing 8‐inch water main  Existing 12‐inch water main  Proposed 8‐inch water main Proposed connection to existing  water system.  Figure 2 258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   4 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  In all cases, it is assumed that the school’s domestic demand at the time of the fire is equal to the  anticipate peak demand.  Utilizing the proposed water system improvements as shown in Figure 2, the  model simulations provide the following results:  1. When applying the sprinkler system demand and peak hour domestic demand at the proposed  school service connection, the model simulation results in a negative pressure.  The negative  pressure is an indicator that the system is unable to deliver the desired flow.  Model simulated  pressure at the proposed fire hydrants surrounding the school range from approximately 6 psi  to 15 psi.  2. The simulated available hydrant fire flow (external hose allowance) is approximately 1,250 gpm  or less while maintaining a 20 psi residual pressure.  The actual available flow rate would be  dependent upon the conditions of operation and customer demand at the time of the fire.  3. As is evident from the simulated results of the individual fire protection components, the  simultaneous operation of both the sprinkler system and external hose allowance cannot be  achieved with the proposed water system improvements.  As is most often the case, and exhibited in this instance, fire protection is the criterion by which water  main geometry (sizes and locations of mains) is generally determined.  Although the water system  improvements proposed by the school district will meet the needs of the anticipated domestic flow, the  improvements will not provide sufficient capacity to meet the requirements for fire protection.  To  identify the potential improvements necessary to meet the fire protection need, several alternatives  were evaluated.  The alternatives consisted of both single and looped water mains of various sizes as  generally described in the scope of work.  The first alternative considered was an  increase in main size from the point of  connection to the existing water main at  Tudor Oaks to the entrance of the school.   As illustrated in Figure 3, this alternative  increases the size of the proposed 8‐inch  diameter water main to 12‐inches from  Tudor Oaks to the proposed school  service line.  The alternative also includes  an increase to the proposed 6‐inch  diameter water service to 8‐inches due to  a significant pressure loss exhibited under  fire flow conditions.   Although a single 12‐inch water main  increases the overall capacity, the increased main size is only able to deliver approximately 1,500 gpm at  a residual pressure of 20 psi.  The increased capacity would be sufficient to meet the external hose  allowance requirement or the sprinkler system (provided the school would be equipped with a  dedicated pump to increase the sprinkler system operating pressure), but is not sufficient to meet the  total fire protection requirement of both sprinkler and external hose allowance.  Figure 3 12‐inch water main  8‐inch water service  258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   5 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  The second alternative considered was to  extend additional water main to the south  to create a loop, connecting at the  existing 16‐inch water main at Durham  Drive and Hi‐View Drive.  Under this  alternative, the original proposed main  sizes were utilized except for the water  service which, as mentioned above, is  recommended to be a minimum of  8‐inches to minimize the pressure losses  during a fire event.  The alternative is  illustrated in Figure 4.  Extending water main to complete a loop  will create an additional path for water to  flow.  The additional conveyance will  provide an increase in overall capacity when compared to that of a single main.  Under this alternative,  the capacity of the improvements is sufficient to deliver the sprinkler system requirements at a residual  pressure slightly less than 30 psi or is capable to deliver the external hose allowance with a total  anticipated capacity of approximately 1,700 to nearly 1,900 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi.  While  the looped main configuration provides additional capacity, it is still not sufficient to deliver the  requirements of both the sprinkler system and external hose allowance simultaneously.  Simulating the  simultaneous operation of the sprinkler system and an external hose allowance, the available external  hose allowance is limited to approximately 250 gpm while maintaining a minimum pressure of 20 psi.  As neither of the above alternatives will provide sufficient capacity to meet the total fire flow  requirement, additional alternatives must be considered that logically include both an increase in water  main diameter and additional main to create a loop.  The following three additional alternatives were  simulated with the model:  1. Alternative 3: Combine Alternatives 1 and 2, utilizing 12‐inch diameter water main from the  connection at Tudor Oaks to the service connection at the school and utilizing additional 8‐inch  diameter water main to create a loop back to Durham Drive.  2. Alternative 4: Utilize the proposed 8‐inch water main from Tudor Oaks, but increase the  diameter of the additional looping main from 8‐inches to 12‐inches.  3. Alternative 5: Utilize 12‐inch diameter water main from the connection at Tudor Oaks all the  way to Durham Drive.  For comparison, model simulations for Alternatives 3, 4 and 5 were performed to determine the amount  of external hose allowance available when occurring simultaneous with sprinkler system operation and  applying the anticipated domestic demand.  The model simulation results are as follows (values  represent the approximate hydrant flow available while maintaining a 20 psi residual pressure):  1. Alternative 3: 500 gpm  2. Alternative 4: 750 gpm – 900 gpm  3. Alternative 5: 1,100 gpm – 1,200 gpm  Figure 4 Additional 8‐inch water main  Proposed connection to  existing 16‐inch main  258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   6 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  With a target hydrant flow of 1,250 gpm, only Alternative 5 offers the possibility to achieve the desired  hydrant flow while simultaneously operating the sprinkler system.  As the modeling represents a  snapshot in time, the actual available hydrant flow may be slightly more or less than the model  simulated values, again depending on the actual conditions of operation and demands at the time of the  fire.  As the current conditions of operation utilized in the model are generally conservative (no well  pumps operating and towers 10 feet below overflow), the available hydrant flow, although likely more,  may also be less than the simulated results if the actual tower water levels are lower than simulated in  the model.  Also, as the available flows are calculated with a residual pressure of 20 psi, it will be  necessary for the school to be equipped with a dedicated pump to increase the sprinkler system  pressure to acceptable operating levels.  It is also worthwhile to note that the model simulations represent what is most likely an initial condition  that will change over time as the water system expands and additional improvements are completed.   Thus, what is marginally adequate now, may be more than adequate in the future.  Future water main  improvements near the school should increase local flow capacity which will likely result in an increase  in available fire protection flow at the school.  The school district, the City, and the fire department  should therefore determine if the anticipated initial condition of marginal adequacy is sufficient, or if  additional improvements are necessary to increase the “margin of error.”  To increase the margin of error the school district and City may consider extending larger diameter  water main east from Durham Drive.  Utilizing larger diameter main, most likely 16‐inches in diameter,  will increase flow availability at the school.  It is likely not necessary that the entire length of main  between Durham Drive and the school would need to be increased, but the amount would be  dependent upon how much of a margin of error is desired.  Alternately, if it is possible, the school  district may consider changes to the school’s sprinkler system that may reduce the total flow rate  required during a fire event.    In a related, yet wholly independent topic, is the need for reliability.  Water systems are planned and  designed to provide reliability which is intended to ensure continuation of service in the event of a  water main failure.  Maintaining water service to facilities such as hospitals, nursing homes, child day  care centers, and schools is considered particularly important in protecting the occupants of those  facilities.  As a single water main provides no reliability and would likely require the evacuation of such  facilities if left without water, it is the least desirable service option and should be avoided whenever  possible.  A minimum of two feeds should be utilized to ensure that the minimum requirements for  facility operation can be met with one feed out of service.    The definition of “minimum requirements” however needs to be determined and may be more than is  defined by local, state, or federal regulation.  While the anticipated domestic demand is certainly within  the definition of minimum requirements, for the safety and protection of the inhabitants of the facility,  a minimum amount of fire protection should also be part of the minimum requirements.  As  demonstrated in Alternatives 1 and 2, a single main can provide a sufficient flow to meet the domestic  demand and internal fire protection (sprinkler system) plus a small percentage of the desired external  hose allowance, which may be sufficient to meet the definition of minimum requirements.    Therefore, based upon both hydraulic performance and reliability, a looped 12‐inch (or larger) water  main as illustrated in Figure 5 is the recommended alternative.  Based upon the 12‐inch diameter loop  alternative, the anticipated total fire protection available is estimated to be approximately 2,700 gpm  258 Corporate Drive, Suite 200  Madison, WI 53714-2407  Tel. (608) 819-2600   7 01/13/17  R:\CLIENTS DATA\13\Model\Middle School\Memo\New Middle School Evaluation Summary TM.docx~  with both connecting mains in service and approximately 1,500 to 1,900 gpm should one connecting  main be out of service.    In addition to the evaluation of service to the proposed school, the City of Muskego requested an  opinion of probable cost for the construction of the extended water main from the school site to  Durham Drive.  Based upon the route identified in Figure 5, the estimated cost to construct a 12‐inch  diameter water main approximately 3,640 feet is $675,000, excluding engineering or administrative  fees.  SAB:sab cc:  Scott Kloskowski, City of Muskego  Dan Butler, PE, Ruekert & Mielke, Inc.  File  Figure 5 Connection to existing water system  at Tudor Oaks  Connection to existing water system  at Durham Drive  12‐inch water main  8‐inch water main  Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Common Council Standing Committee Public Works To: Public Works Committee From: Michael N Paulos, P.E., City Engineer Subject: Request for right-of-way vacation adjacent to Edgewater Heights Date: January 17, 2017 Background Information: Edgewater Heights LLC, Jason and Sheri Hackbarth, and Michael and Denise Collins are requesting to vacate the right-of-way as described in the attachment. This is for a section of previously dedicated right-of-way adjacent to the Edgewater Heights plat and was a condition of approval that this right-of-way needed to be vacated by the developer. Recommendation for Action by Committee: Recommend vacation of the right-of-way adjacent to Edgewater Heights and as described in the attachment with all costs related to said vacation process being paid for by the petitioner. Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Common Council Standing Committee Public Works To: Public Works Committee From: Michael N. Paulos, P.E., City Engineer Subject: Approve the 2017 Road Program Date: January 17, 2017 Background Information: Staff is preparing the 2017 Road Program. The overall project budget is $750,000 and $62,221.41 is available through the LRIP funds. The following is a list of the roads being addressed: Main Focus Projects 1. Parkland Drive and Jacob Court a. Mill and overlay 2-inches b. Replacement of concrete curb and gutter 2. Subdivision northeast of Little Muskego a. Mill 4-inches, Pulverize 1-inch, install 4.5-inches of Asphalt i. Jewel Court ii. Kirkwood Drive iii. Forest Drive iv. Hiawatha Drive v. Lake Street vi. Redman Drive vii. Wildwood Drive viii. Shady Lane. 3. Concrete Pad Replacement at Salt Shed Recommendation for Action by Committee: Approve Staff to receive competitive bids for the 2017 Road Program. ^_ ^_ ^_ PARKER DR HILLENDALE DR CROWBAR DR HEINRICH DR THODE DR KELSEY DR BOXHORN DR LANNON DR KELSEY DR HENNEBERRY DR LAWNDALE PL L O O M I S R D WOODS RD J A N E S VIL L E R D ENTERPRISE DR WENTLAND DR SANDALWOOD DR EAST DR SPRING LN GLENBROOK DR J A N E S V I L L E R D B R I D G E P O R T W A Y PIONEERDR LANNON DR L A K E WOODDR SOUTHERN DR WOODS RD M U S KEGO DAM DR STEEPLECHASEDR MCSHANE DR RYAN DR HACKBE R R Y HILL C T SATURN DR SUNSET DR CRYSTALD R LIONS PARK DR FAIRFIEL D D R LENTINI DR WESTWOOD DR MARYBECKLN HI VIEW DR SOMERSET DR KELSEY DR H AWTHORNERD N O R T H V I E W D R HILLSIDE DR KURTZE LN BROOKSIDE DR MOORLAND RD HEATHER L N MUSKEGO DAM DR VELVA DR MYSTIC DR LEMBEZEDER DR MADYSON CT L I N KSWAY CT FENNIMORE LN CASEY DR J A N E S V IL L E R D L O O M I S D R JENNIFER DR RANCH DR AUD MAR DR P ARKLA N D DR SCHAEFERDR DU RH A M D R CE N TE R D R HED GEWOOD DR KEELEY CT EMERSON DR S P I NNAKERDR OAK GROVE DR C O T T A G ECIRE LARKSPUR R D LIONSPARKDR HAW KS TRL W HITTIER TER WILLIAMS DR EA GLES W AY L O O M IS R D KENW O O D D R MEADOW DR K IRKWO ODDRGOLD DR FOXBORO PL E A S Y S T PILGRIMDR ROSSMARDR C O O K D R CINDY DR TOPAZ D R SAROYAN RD HARDWICKEPL WOODSRD DEER CREEK CT ROGER DR SCHOOL DR LO O MIS C T B Y R ON RD P A S A D E NA DR DIA M O N D D R DAISY D R SCHUBRING DR S DENOON RD GREEN C T PIONEERDR RACINEAVE NATURE CT FREEDO M AVE M AC L E N D R DOVER LN HILLVIEW DR H I G H BLUFFDR CHESTNUT RIDGE CT A P O L L O D R W O ODLANDCT V A L L E Y DR KIPLING DRGOLD DR MUSKEGO DR THO R N APPLECT HILLENDALEDR W O O D S R D S I L V E R D R D AISYDR KURTZELN PARKLAND DR L A K E V I E W D R NURSERY CT DEBRA CT N KAREN CT CROWBAR DR APPLEWOOD LN DOUGLAS DR RIV ER O A K S CT GROVEST R A CIN E A V E FIRESIDE DR HICKORY LN BERGER LN MARTINDR ALANDR VINEST TESSCORNERSDR I S L A N D D R BROOKE LN PROSP E CT DR G REEN ST CORNELL DR REGENCYCT L O O M I S R D DEBA C K D R M U S K E G O DR G E M I N I CT KATHRYNDR SOUTHLN WOODS RD GRAY FOX TR L O N Y XD R SAR OYAN R D NORTHLN MARINER CT HI G HLA N D PARKDR WESTLYN D R WINDOVER CT BENJAMIN CT LO O MIS DR LUEHRING DR CAM I L L A C T D E R B Y CT TOMAR LN HILLENDALEDR J E WEL C T MYSTIC DR M E R C U R Y D R T I N A D R SH E R W O O D CIR KIPLING CT W O O DS RD JA E G E R P L WINDS O R R D LEE CT K R A M E R C T T E S S C O R N E R S D R FIRESIDE CT AUDREYCT P R OSPECT DR CHEVIOT RD NATU RE D R LINDACT MYSTIC CT KAYLA LN MUSKEGO DAM DR MARTINDR RAVENRD LAKEDR FOX T AIL C I R VINE ST PAIGE CT P R E S T ON LN HE M MIN G WAY G E MINI D R JEAN D R K I T T E R Y C T HILLENDALE DR VALERIE DR R U B YD R SUE MA RIELN C A R DINAL D R BLUHM DR PEARL DR TESSCORNERSDR B A Y C T QUIET W O OD DR WE STCOTDR ESSEX CT COTTAG E CIRW RYAN DR DLYNN CT BRIST L E C O N E L N BO E H M C T T ONYLEMALN TANS DR W A U E R L N A P O L L O D R EDITH CT M A R TIN D R M I C H I D R J A N E S V IL L E R D GAF F N E Y D R P RO S P E CT D R SUNNY HILL DR ERIN CT IDA CT CORN E L L C I R HIAWATHADR A V ONC T GARNET D R C A MILL A DR C L E A R B R O O K D R KRISTINDR PRIEGEL DR G E M D R P A R K D R FOREST DR CEDARCRESTLN M A R TIN C T LOOMISDR PEARLDR YO R K C TADRIANDR SAN C T U A RY DR CA R D I N A L C T COLLEGE AVE G A U L K E D R EARL DRTANSDR ADAMCT SHADY LN HARDTKEDR CONRADCT HILLTOP DR OAKCT QUIETW O O D D R ELM D R COLLEGE AVE JEW E L C RESTDR A G A T E D R LAKE ST B L UH M C T KEISER LN LONGF E L L O W L N DARCY CT CIR CLE D R SCENIC DR MAPLEC T FENNIM O R E C T LYNOAKCT JO C T GARDEN TER B R I A RGATE LN HAVEN C T KO S O DR SETTLER WAY HEATHER CT PATRICIACT SKARENCT JENNIFERCT VALERIEDR POINT DENOON RD A NN D R T WINPONDSRD HO L Z D R L Y N N D R BLUE HERONLN W O O D S R D PARKERDR TIMB E R CT COURTLAN D L N BRIDGEPORT W A Y LADWIG DR B A SS B AY LN HOLLY P A TCHCT S A N CTUARY CT STONEBRIDGE W AY R O CK RI D G E C T CAROLYNCT SOMMER FIELD LN ANN ES WAY C R I M S O N C T WINDING TRAIL RD S TONECRESTRD OAKHILLDR GREENRIDGE TRL R AIN T R E E C T FOXTAILCT FOXBOROCIR SEAFARER P A S S KAT H R Y N CT K R I S T I N C T LINCOLNDR CI N D Y C T WIN D CREST C T P L U M C R EE K C T PLUMCREEKBLV D ADRIA N DR BLAC K W A L N U T C T C R A B A P P L E C T BOXHORN DR BOXHORN RESERVE CT ACKER DR HI VIEW D R D U R H A M D R COUNTRYVIEWC T S HE R W OOD CIR SHERWOOD C IR FLINTLOCK TRL COLLEGE AVE GOLDENCT MICHAEL CT GROVE W AY L N BLUEBIRD LN ORIOLE LN L A K E D R JACOB CT P R O V I D E N C E W A Y CHALLENGER D R BURNINGWOODCT SE T TLEMENT CT TIMBERBROOK DR DEERFIELDDR WINDOVERDR T YLER DR MANO R D R B RID G E P O R T C I R SPINNAKERCT FLEETWOODRD GA U LK E C T PASA D E N A D R MONTEREY DR RIDGE R D KINGSTOND R ORCHARDCT PELLM AN LN Q U I E T W O O D CT SOBEK LNSCENICCT EDWAR D C TB R E NNAN DR H AV EN D RJO E L D R L O O M I S R D WALTER HA GEN DR J A N E S V I L L E C T B O S Z H A R D T L N K E L LY D R DART M OUT H CIR R A CIN E A V E THORNAP P L E TRL FEN N I M O R E L N TEN N Y S O NLN FOXBORO C T RACINEAVE JANIS LN CHRISTOPHER LN PARKER DR BELLVIEW DR ETONCT RICHD ORF DR RICHDORFDR CEDAR HILL C T PARKLAND D R B L UEGRASSDR L O D G E D R OV E R LOOKBAYRDANCIENT O A K S D R B A Y SHORE D R LOCHCREST BLVD CAMERON C T DOROTHYDR PRINCETO N C T P R I N C E T O N DR CHAMPIONSDR S C O T T K R A U S E C T SCOTT K R A U S E D R H ARRY CHAMPIONS CT CLAUDEHARMONCIR OLD COURSEWAY CHARLESCT RED O A KCT V I C T O RIA DR B E NDINGB R A E D R G REENHAVENCT MEADO W LAN DS CT L O V E L A N D TURNBERRYCT C O L O NIA L C T Y O U N G W O O D C T D E N I C E C T N D E NICECTS SUE MARIE CT D E A N C T S U MMERIDGE CT RUSSET CT ST O N E C R E ST C T SHORE L N CHURCHILLCT LEMBEZEDER CT ELKWOOD CT D O G W O O D C T COPPEROAKSCT C O P P E R O A K S D R SHAGBARK LN COYOTETRL OLIVECIR GLE N COVECT STILL M EA D O W C T SUSAN CT CHARLOTTE CT GLORIA CT S T L E O N A R D S CT R I C H A R D L N HARB O R CI R RI C COCT KNOLLWOOD CT WESTFIEL D WAY C A N D L E W O O D LN CHERRYWOOD CTBUROAKCT QUIETWOOD CIR C H I C O R Y C T BE R R Y W O O D L N REDFOXRUN BRIS T L E C O N E L N HALEPARKCIR B R I S T L E C O N E C T H A L E P A R K C T POESPL SHERWOODCT DUNSTAN CT HALEPA R K DR S A R O Y ANCT LOWELL PL C O L E R I D G ECT S O M E RSET CT S O M E RSETCIR EMPRESSCT CH E S T E R T O N C T STRATFORDCT LUDINGTON CIR OXFORD CT F AI R F I EL D C T CON COR D C T INDEPE N D ENCE D R HIDDEN CRE E KCT SANDY KNOL L C T BEL MONT DR B R E N T WOODDR CATALINA DR GOLDEN C O U NTRY D R S A N D A L W O O D C I R HONEYSUCKLECIR RO S E W O OD CI R ROSEW O O D DR H O N E Y S U C K LED R SARAH CT PAMELACT MOONL I G HT LN LODGE BLVD CAST L E G L E N C T CANFIE L D D RCANFIELDCT L AKE D R PLEASANTVIEWDR WILDWOOD DR REDMAN D R ROSSMARCT M ARY BEC K CT CRE S T D R D U R H A M C T C T V ARDON CT DURHAM PL D U R H A M P L O A K R IDGELN STLEONARDS DR STLEONARDSCIR GR E G O RYD R KURTZECT J A N E S V I L L E R D RACINE AVE BAYLANE PL BAYLANE PL BAYL A N E T E R CLARENDON PL HORN PARK DR N O R T H C A P E R D NORTHCAPERD NORTHCAPERD NORTH SHORE DR RIESEDR S KYLARK L N WESTTOWER DR BAYLANE DR EASTTOWERDR C L AIR E B RID G E C T CREEKSIDE DR A C O R N DRCREEKSIDECT NORTH SHORE DRBOSCHDR N O R T H S H ORELN ELLIO T T C T R E S T F ULLLN WIL L O W W AY JAMESCT UNION CHURCH DR ELIZA BETHCT BELLE CHASS E P K W YBROKENARROWCT M O O R L A N D R D J A N E S V I L L E R D RACINEAVE S 124TH ST FAIRWAYLN CHICK EVANSCT LLOYDMANGRUMCT B R O O K VIE W C T S T A N D R EW S DRWALTER HAGEN CT S DENOON RD E A S T S H O R E D R CALVIN C T FIELD DR TRAIL CT S T A G S LEAPCT J I M M Y D E M A R E T D R TANSDR MOORL A N D R D W OOD BERRY CT WOOD B E RRYLN LA U R A L N DURHAMDR SU MMERTIMELN COMMERCECENTERPKWY COMMERCE DR WOOD L A N D P L WOODLAND PL LOOMIS DR CHERRYWOODDR BAYLANEPL HARVESTCT SAN DY B E A CH DR WOODLANDPL W O ODLAND PL CHAMBERLAIN HILL DR SOUTHVIEW CT O AKHILLTRL SCHULTZ LN ANNES WAY CROWBAR DR S I M A N DL DR MUSKEGODR CAMBR I D GECTW CAM B RIDGE CT E CANTERBURY CT C O V ENTRY LN I N D I A N T R L WEATHE R WOO D C I R PRAIRIEME A D OWS DR N O R T H C A P E R D COTTONTAIL CT W E A T H E R W O O D C T COLLE G ECT BOXHORNRE S E R V E D R L I N D L E Y C T UPLA N D L N AST O R HILLSCT HARRINGTON FREEDOM A V E MOURNING DOVE H U N TE R S HILL C T H U N T E R S HILL C T B i g M u s k e g o L a k e L i t t l eMuskeg oLake L a k eDenoo n B a s sBay T o w n o f V e r n o n C i t y o f F r a n k l i n T o w n o f N o r w a y C i t y o f N e w B e r l i n 2 0 1 7 R O A D I M P R O V E M E N T P L A N City of Muskego Waukesha County, Wisconsin C r e a t e d B y :C i t y o f M u s k e g oEngineering D i v i s i o n U p d a t e d : J a n u a r y 1 1 , 2 0 1 7I M A P L E G E N D Street Lakes City Boundary Parking Lot/Other Road Improvements ^_ Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Common Council Standing Committee Public Works To: Public Works Committee From: Michael N. Paulos, P.E., City Engineer Subject: Approval of Public Water Main for Heritage Senior Campus Date: January 17, 2017 Background Information: The attached plans for public water main for Heritage Senior Campus are in the final stages of technical review and staff feels that a Committee approval contingent upon all final staff comments being addressed is appropriate at this time. Recommendation for Action by Committee: Approve the public water main improvements for Heritage Senior Campus contingent upon completion of staff’s technical review comments.