The URL can be used to link to this page

Parks and Conservation Packet - 6/8/2016 CITY OF MUSKEGO PARKS AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE AGENDA June 8, 2016 5:30 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM MAY 4, 2016 NEW BUSINESS 1. * Election of President, Vice President, and Secretary 2. Recommendation of Approval of Agreement with US Fish and Wildlife Services for Durham Conservation Site. 3. Review of Park Surveys 4. Park and Conservation Plan Final Review DIRECTOR’S REPORT 1. Public Works Director's Report 2. Conservation Coordinator's Report 3. Recreation Manager's Report COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW Announcements only. No discussion or action will be taken. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS SERVICE, MUSKEGO CITY HALL, (262) 679-4136. Unapproved CITY OF MUSKEGO PARKS AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE MINUTES May 4, 2016 5:30 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER Chairman Toby Whipple called the meeting to order at 5:30 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Toby Whipple, Ald. Kevin Kubacki, Barbara Erdmann, Brett Hyde, Sharon Roy, Paul Peardon and Director Jeff Muenkel. Excused: Jerry Hulbert, Howard Schneider, and Bill Miller. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was noticed in accordance with the open meeting laws. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 6, 2016 MEETING. Brett Hyde made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 6, 2016 meeting. Paul Peardon seconded. Motion Passed 6 in favor. NEW BUSINESS Review of Park Surveys Review of Parks and Conservation Plan Draft Approve Standard Color Scheme for Parks Buildings DIRECTOR’S REPORT Public Works Director's Report Conservation Coordinator's Report Recreation Manager's Report COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW Announcements only. No discussion or action will be taken. ADJOURNMENT Paul Peardon made a motion to adjourn at 6:13 PM. Sharon Roy seconded. Motion Passed 6 in favor. Respectfully submitted, Kellie McMullen, Transcribing Secretary FWS NonOBL 11/13 Landowner Agreement No: WIPLO-16-012 Cost Structure: FF03R7WI00 FXHC11210303HR0 or NAWCA Funding (TBD) PARTNERS FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE PROGRAM LANDOWNER AGREEMENT This Landowner Agreement (Agreement), dated 05/10/2016, between City of Muskego and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is entered into pursuant to authority contained in the Partners for Fish and Wildlife Act (P.L. 109-294), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742a-j), as amended. This project was selected for funding because the Landowner(s) share(s) a common objective with the USFWS to restore habitat for the benefit of Federal trust species on private lands, and the project supports priority actions identified in the Regional Partners for Fish and Wildlife (Partners) Program Strategic Plan. City of Muskego, P.O. Box 749,W182S8200 Racine Ave., Muskego, WI 53150, hereby agrees to participate with the USFWS in conducting certain wildlife management practices on lands owned or managed in Waukesha County, State of Wisconsin, described as follows: all of, or within, T5N-R20E, Sec13 NW1/4., SW1/4, (see attached map in Exhibit A. for details). In signing this Agreement, the Landowner(s) join(s) as a participant in a wildlife habitat improvement program and grants to the USFWS and any other cooperators signing this Agreement] authority to complete the habitat improvement project or the Landowner(s) may personally carry out management activities with financial or material support as described in attached Exhibit A. Any donation of supplies or equipment to the Landowner for carrying out the habitat improvements is included in Exhibit A. The activities conducted pursuant to this Agreement are not to replace, supplement or otherwise contribute to any mitigation or compensation that may be required of the Landowner(s) or other parties as a result of any mandated requirements. The term of this Agreement (also referred to as the habitat retention period) will be completed on 05/10/2026. This Agreement may be modified at any time by mutual written consent of the parties. It may be terminated by either party upon 30 days advance written notice to the other party. However, if the Landowner(s) terminate(s) the Agreement before its expiration, or if the Landowner(s) should materially default on these commitments, then the Landowner(s) agree(s) to reimburse the USFWS prior to final termination for the prorated costs of all habitat improvements placed on the land through this Agreement. For these purposes, the total cost of the habitat improvements to the United States is agreed to be $ 5,000.00 FWS NonOBL 11/13 Landowner: The Landowner(s) or his/her land manager, with legal authority over land management decisions, guarantee(s) ownership of the above-described land and warrants that there are no outstanding rights that interfere with this Landowner Agreement. The Landowner(s) will notify the USFWS of planned or pending changes in ownership. A change of ownership shall not change the terms of this Agreement. The Agreement and terms shall be in effect on the described land for the term of the Agreement. The Landowner(s) agree(s) to allow access (with advance notice) to the USFWS to implement the project described in Exhibit A, and to monitor project success. The Landowner(s) retain(s) all rights to control trespass and retains all responsibility for taxes, assessments, and damage claims. During the habitat retention period, the landowner must maintain the habitat restored under this award. At the end of the habitat retention period, the habitat improvement project will become the sole property and complete responsibility of the Landowner(s). There shall be no obligation to the USFWS after the term of the Agreement has expired. The Landowner(s) will be responsible for securing any necessary permits. Technical advice and support will be provided by participating agencies in the application for the permit(s). The Landowner(s) agree(s) to identify USFWS contribution to the project during public presentations, reports, or other information published about the project, as appropriate. USFWS: The USFWS will work with the Landowner(s) throughout the entire Agreement term to support actions needed to ensure that the project is designed and constructed per the Agreement and functions as intended. The USFWS, its agents, or assignees will provide advanced notice prior to accessing the Landowner(s) property to implement the project described in the work plan, and to monitor project success. The USFWS assumes no liability for damage or injury other than that caused by its own negligence, on the above acreage. The USFWS does not assume jurisdiction over the premises by this Agreement. FWS NonOBL 11/13 Spatial Information Sharing: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, permission must be obtained from the Landowner before any personal information can be released. The only information that can be shared is payment information that is authorized by law. Therefore, Landowner consent is requested to allow for sharing of spatial information about this project solely with conservation cooperators providing technical or financial assistance with the restoration, enhancement or management of fish and wildlife habitat. I, the Landowner, consent to having spatial information about this project shared with other conservation cooperators I, the Landowner, do NOT wish to have any spatial information about this project shared with other conservation cooperators Signatures: ______________________________________________________________________________ City of Muskego Date ______________________________________________________________________________ Kurt Waterstradt, USFWS Partners Program State Coordinator Date FWS NonOBL 11/13 EXHIBIT A The habitat improvements described below are agreed to by City of Muskego, the USFWS, in a Landowner Agreement dated 05/10/2016. Landowner Contact Information: Name: City of Muskego Mailing Address: P.O. Box 749,W182S8200 Racine Ave. City: Muskego State WI Zip code : 53150 Telephone Numbers: Home: 262-679-5617 Cell: Email: tzagar@cityofmuskego.org Description of Habitat Improvement Project and Objectives: Project consists of restoring 2 acres of wetland restoration and planting 16 acres of tallgrass prairie habitat for migratory birds and pollinators. Benefits to migratory birds include improved nesting and brood rearing cover and increased foraging opportunities based on the diverse seed mix provided by the USFWS. This project is within a high priority Upper Mississippi Great Lakes Joint Venture waterfowl area. USFWS will: The USFWS will design and supervise construction of wetland projects and provide funding for wetland construction, prairie seed and planting up to the agreed amount on budget table. The Landowner(s) will: Work with contractors to plant 16 acres of prairie, manage and maintain site over the duration of the agreement period. FWS NonOBL 11/13 Budget Table: Object Class Categoriesa Contributing Partners Landowner USFWS Partners Program USFWS Other Programs Other Non-USFWS Totals Personnel $ $ PartPartPartners program $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Fringe benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Travel $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Equipment $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Supplies $ $3,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Contractual $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Other (In-kind) $2,500.00 $ $ $ $ Other $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Totals $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $ $ $8,500.00 $ $ $ $ a The total cost-share by the Cooperator, Service and Landowner must remain the same, however allocations by category may be redistributed upon prior approval by the Service Any work to be completed may be modified with the mutual agreement of the aforementioned parties. Budget Narrative: (required for all applicants, should add up to total in Budget Table) Supplies: 16 acres of prairie seed @ $187.50/acre = $3,000 (FWS) 16 acres planting @$35/acre = $560.00 (City of Muskego) (in-kind) Augmented seed provided by City of Muskego (in-kind) = $1,000.00 Contractual: (4) ¼ acre scrapes and tile break =24 hours at @$125/hour = $2,000.00 (FWS), $1000 City of Muskego Mowing (in-kind) = $940.00 (City of Muskego) TOTAL: $8,500.00 Wetland Basin = Scrape = Tile Break = Spoils spread <6” = 2’ 8:1 8:1 Wetland Scrape Plan View Wetland Scrape Cross Section City of Muskego – Scrape Designs Notes •(4) Irregular shaped wildlife scrapes •Agricultural drainage tile break within scrape 1 & 2 (see map) •Will be flagged prior to construction •Spoils to be spread in agricultural field, planted to prairie in fall of 2016 •Scrapes average 150 x 100 each (~ 622 cu yds each) •See MAP for exact locations ~ 120’ x 70’ bottom CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Parks & Conservation Committee June 8, 2016 Meeting To: Parks and Conservation Committee From: Jeff Muenkel, CEcD AICP EDFP Subject: Park Survey Review Date: June 2, 2016 Staff emailed out the synopsis of the park surveys about a week ago and the synopsis can be found attached herein as well again. Also provided herein are the staff recommendations we found most pertinent from the surveys for each park and conservation area. The Committee should discuss the overall survey findings and direct staff of what recommendations we will want to formally include in the new Park and Conservation Plan based on the survey results. Full Survey Results can still be found at the weblinks here as well: General Survey https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-LKXKQ65S/ Denoon https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-3KKTR65S/ Bluhm Farm Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2ZP7T65S/ Jensen and Lee Hubka Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-YLY5T65S/ Freedom Square https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-6LNSF65S/ Badertscher Preserve https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-HJJLG65S/ Manchester Hill Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-M5N9B65S/ Moorland Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-RYQBH65S/ Engel Conservation Area https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-XDTP665S/ Idle Isle Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-MJ6NZ65S/ Horn, Vets, Settlement https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-TRYS565S/ Park Arthur https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-83PF8Z5S/ Kurth Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-KPDRLZ5S/ Schmidt Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-CJWY7Z5S/ Lions Park https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-NPXKDZ5S/ Parks and Conservation Plan DRAFT Survey Recommendations May 2016 Background This document contains the Muskego staff initial recommendations based upon the park and conservation area surveys sent out in March 2016. The Parks and Conservation Board will use these staff recommendations at their June 2016 meeting and ultimately forward their own set of recommendations from the survey results to be a part of the new Park and Conservation Plan 2017-2021. General Park & Conservation Survey Based Recommendations  Add to Muskego Park System: o Splashpad o Disc Golf o Ice Skating o Allow Dogs o Dog Park o More Trails o More Shade Trees in key areas  Underserved Areas of Parks include downtown Muskego and Big Muskego Lake Area  Trail items to consider: o Pave more of the main trails o Add a trail on Racine Avenue south of High School to south end of city o More annual maintenance o Add trail on Woods from Durham to Tess Corners  Most visited: o County Park, Park Arthur, Idle Isle, Bluhm, and Moorland  Add to Muskego Conservation System: o Consideration for snowshoe and cross country ski trails o More Conservation workshops/conservation events o Consideration for outdoor education center o Allowance of dogs Bluhm Farm Park Survey Based Recommendations  Consider Playground Equipment upgrade over next five years  Add Woodchips/Re-grade (to avoid flooding) path in woods  Identify north and south park sides better with signage  Create separate basketball court outside of parking lot  More Goose Control  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement  Add back bat house  Maintain Pavilion Annually  Consider paved connection path to Tudor Oaks along McShane  Make rec trail more identifiable/signage Denoon Park Survey Based Recommendations  Update Trails around subdivision access to the east; make more identifiable  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement  Consider addition of pavilion towards back of park  Consider permanent bathrooms  Consider Disc golf location here  Dredge boat launch for easier navigation  Cleanup boat launch/waterfront area/boardwalk  Add more identifiable trail signage  Consider new playground and better positioning in future Freedom Square Park Survey Based Recommendations  Still heavily used by neighborhood  Update court surfaces  Update basketball and tennis equipment Horn Field, Veterans Park & Historic Settlement Survey Based Recommendations  Update trail surfaces throughout (especially wet areas)  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement  Update playground at Horn Field  Install trail identification signage  Add trail section south of Horn thru wooded area  Refurbish Horn Baseball field; regrade wet areas  Possibly utilize Horn Field for other sports  Add more landscaping/shading at Vets  Cleanup Vets memorial landscape area  Add new grill at Vets  Add more rec opportunities at Vets (basketball/tetherball/smaller scale disc golf)  Consider Veterans Park as future splashpad location for city  Add permanent basketball hoop at Settlement  Update landscaping around settlement buildings and maintain  Fund settlement barn repair costs in hopes of utilizing for future group events  Bring back dinosaur at Vets playground Idle Isle Park Survey Based Recommendations  Curb goose problem  Update existing playground equipment; no addition closer to beach though  Install permanent boat cleaning station  Consider fee increase schedule to aid improvements (include larger fees for outside city users)  Better enforcement and consistency of fee collection  Improve boat launch (landscaping/piers)  Investigate actual parking needs  Be consistent on litter cleanup/enforcement  Look into having lifeguards  Have concessions  Have rentable canoes, kayaks, and paddleboards  Cleanup shorelines (remove weeds; riprap additions)  Add trail around all water frontage  Cleanup beach/swim area (make beach larger/deeper; be consistent on seaweed removal and misc. cleaning)  Overall re-landscaping  More Police presence Jensen & Lee Hubka Park Survey Based Recommendations  Cleanup Shoreline and make amenity at Lee Hubka Channel Access  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement  Allow alternative uses for open turf area  Explore parking thru to Silver Drive and expansion  Do not remove baseball fencing but enhance field and bleacher area  Make one of the Lee Hubka basketball courts a tennis court  Explore newer playground equipment in future years Kurth Park Survey Based Recommendations  Explore newer playground equipment in future years  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement  Add signage throughout park for better direction  Rehab storage/bathroom building  Remove basketball court from parking lot and find separate location for court  Update rec trail surfaces and maintain  Cleanup shoreline along creek  Add more landscape/trees to park  Determine remedies for soccer parking Lions Park Survey Based Recommendations  Add more benches/picnic areas  Determine parking remedies  Make asphalt areas more accessible  Update bathroom/storage structure  Allow concessions  Add more landscape/trees to park Manchester Hill Park Survey Based Recommendations  Explore adding permanent bathrooms  Update trails (especially around pond)  Cleanup pond shorelines  Consider benches and/or lights around pond for winter usage  Update playground equipment  Add trail identification signage  Consider fish stocking program for pond (may need dredging)  Consider pier for pond  Upgrade pavilion  Add more landscape/trees to park Moorland Park Survey Based Recommendations  Add more landscaping/shading throughout  Improve Soccer field turf  More signage for trails  Consider rehabbing pond and stocking with fish  Consider for splashpad location  Consider pavilion and permanent bathrooms  Woodchip playground surface annually  Keep prairie planting berms along roadway  Don’t expand Skatepark  No Community garden  Consider rubber base around swing area  Discuss senior rec activities of bocce ball and pickleball Park Arthur Survey Based Recommendations  Overseed grass areas throughout park and on ballfields  Add playground equipment  Update trail leading up sledding hill  Better maintenance of roadway edges  Add picnic areas  Install speed deterrence; increased police presence/enforcement  Add more landscape/trees to park (shading)  Add more trail loops  Add trail identification signage  Consider ice skating with rentals  Add more trails throughout west side of park  Consider dog park for west side of park  Consider soccer/football for west side of park  Do not sell west side of park  Add scoreboards to baseball fields Schmidt Park Survey Based Recommendations  Remove the prairie grass areas  Upgrade basketball court area  Upgrade playground equipment  Upgrade tennis courts and associated fencing  Add more benches/picnic tables  Add more landscape/trees to park  Do not add parking  Consider pickleball in tennis courts  Add soccer goal in open turf area  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement  Keep as mainly open turf Badertscher Preserve Survey Based Recommendations  Add more signs where private property exists  Mow trails in summer more  Consider self-guided tours  Extend boardwalks over rough trail areas  Consider observation platform  Don’t pave parking lot  Add more interpretive trail signage throughout  Consider acquiring abutting parcels for conservation via purchase and/or dedication  Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement Engel Conservation Area Survey Based Recommendations  Add more views to water areas  Maintain gravel access road annually  Mow trails in summer more  Improve trails throughout  Extend boardwalks over rough trail areas  Add conservation related events  Consider outdoor interpretive center here Parks and Conservation Plan Survey Summary 2017 – 2021 Background This document provides a summary of the survey results from the surveys sent out in March 2016 as part of gathering information for the new Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021. These results were used by the Parks and Consecration Board to formulate specific recommendations for the city’s individual park and conservation areas. The following results are provided with parks areas noted first and conservation areas towards the end of the document. Individual surveys were sent out to neighbors of parks and conservation areas within 1000 feet from each park and conservation area border. Further, surveys were all found online and every owner in the City of Muskego was notified of the survey opportunity via the city/school quarterly newsletter. While specific questions were asked of specific parks and conservation areas, the city also requested questions relating to the overall park and conservation system. That general question section is found first in the document below. General Park & Conservation Questions 1. Current park facilities and lands are sufficient. 2. Are there any specific park/recreation amenities you’d like to see in the Muskego Park system? If so, what and at which park in the city?  Splash Pad-88  Splash Pad (Vets)-5  Splash Pad (Schmidt) -4  Splash Pad (Lions Park)-2  Splash Pad (Denoon)  Splash Pad (Bluhm)  Frisbee Golf-81  Frisbee Golf (Bluhm) – 2  Frisbee Golf (Denoon)  Ice Skating – 80  Ice Skating (Moorland Park)  Ice Skating (Park Arthur)-2  Ice Skating (Horn/Vets)  Ice Skating (Bluhm)  Ice Skating (Jensen)  Ice Skating (Idle Isle)  Dogs allowed/park -58  Pool – 32  Trails -26  Trails (Park Arthur)-2  Trail (connecting Idle Isle and Martin)  Paved trails-2  Tennis Court/lighted-13  Tennis Court (Lions)  Lighted Rec Fields-11  Restrooms-11  Restrooms (Idle Isle)Updated  Basketball Court -8  Basketball (Manchester)  Pickle ball-8  Soccer fields/goals -8  Paths -lighted for safety - 6  Baseball Diamonds New/Improve -5  Baseball Diamond (maintained Jensen)  Baseball Diamonds (Rebuild Horn)  Volleyball Courts-5  Beer Garden-4  Cross country-4  Picnic space-4  Benches-4  Rentals -4  Rentals -4  Sledding hills -4  Snowmobile/ATV trails -3  Concession-3  Garbage cans-3  Pavilion-3  Another skatepark-3  Swim pond-2  Shuffleboard-2  Snowshoeing-2  Landscpaing-2  Archery -2  Archery (Lake Denoon)  Archery expanded (Park Arthur)  County Golf Course/practice area -2  Football fields - 2  Football fields (Vets)  Playground equipment-2  Playground equipment (Park Arthur)- 2  Playground equipment (Horn)  Playground Equipment updated (Bluhm)  Water park  Gardens  Senior Activities (Moorland Park)  Pool(Vets) -  Tether ball  Grills for food  Connecting bike baths to other communities  Lighted play areas  Shade trees -  Shade trees (Kurth/Moorland)  Swings-additional (Schmidt)  Swings-additonal (Kurth)  Hopscotch lines (Lions)  No Pet signs  Summer Hockey Rink (Park Arthur)  Replace woodchips at playground  Outdoor rinse station (lake)  Fishing pond for kids  Parking (additional – Idle Isle)  Water Foundation-  Jogging track  Fustal (Soccer)Court 3. There are areas in the City underserved by parks.  Parkland Mall land-5  Big Muskego Lake -4  Hwy 36 - 4  South east -3  Around Little Muskego Lake -2  Eastern area - 2  Dog Park  Anywhere that is not walking distance to a school  Towards North Cape  Western  Southwest Area  Janesville and Pioneer  Beach  North side  Downtown  Woodland Creek Area  Muskego El area  Tess Corners  Woods/Durham  Southern 4. Current conservation land facilities are sufficient? 5. Are there any specific conservation park amenities you’d like to see in the Muskego system?  SnowshoeingTrails- 60  Workshops -38  Rental -32  Education Center -30  Conservation Events – 27  Trails-24  Cross Country Skiing -16  Dogs allowed/park -13  All good ideas - 5  Kids Nature Programs –3  Pavilions - 3  Ice skating -3  Tennis courts-3  trail improvement -2  Playground area – 2  Bathrooms – 2  Planetarium/observatory-2  Gardens  Mountain bike trails  Sitting areas  Plow in winter (Engel)  Senior facilities  Snowmobile trails  Leave as is  Statutes with flowers –  Fishing pier –  Bench seating by water-  Concessions –  Sledding hill –  Walking track  Boating workshops –  Beer Garden  Improve Idle Isle Beach  Hunter Education  Pitch and putt golf  Allow crossbow/archery  Bathroom (Engel)  Wildlife protection  Natural floral center  Overnight parking  Indoor pool  More access on BML for fishing  Area for Nude sunbathers  Splash pad  Frisbee golf 6. Which park/conservation areas have you most visited this past year?  County Park -97  Park Arthur -96  Idle Isle -90  Bluhm -71  Moorland -69  Vets/Horn/Settlement -64  Denoon -55  Engel -40  Schmidt -39  Manchester -27  Lions Park -21  Jensen/Lee Hubka -21  Badertscher -18  All -7  Freedom Sq -6 7. Do you use any trails in the community? If so, which areas the most?  General bike trails -153  Woods Road - 56  Moorland - 45  County Park - 34  Bluhm - 30  We Energy Trail - 23  Denoon - 21  Engel -14  Janesville -13  Vets/Settlement/Horn -12  Racine -12  Street Car/Railroad- 9  Park Arthur-8  Baderttscher -8  Martin Drive -7  Tess Corners -7  Bay Lane -6  Idle Isle -4  Lannon -4  Pioneer -4  Parkland -4  Quitwood Drive Trail -3  Manchester park -3  Lions Park Trail -2  Lannon  Schmidt  Big Muskego  Hwy 36  Kurth 8. Are there any specific trail issues you have or areas you feel are underserved with trails in the community?  Pave (or hardpack) trails - 18  Racine South to Denoon - 15  Maintain better (ruts/potholes/low spots/weeds) - 14  Woods Road (Durham to Tess Corners) - 13  Allow Dogs - 6  Clear Snow - 6  Martin Road (Copper Oaks to Park Arthur/Idle Isle) - 5  Garbage cans along main trails – 5  Bay Lane Drive - 4  McShane (Bluhm Park to Tudor Oaks) - 4  Resurfaced WE Energies trail not good - 3  Racine north of Janesville - 3  Equestrian Trails - 2  Better trail signage - 2  Enough Trails  Exercise Stations  Lannon (Martin to Janesville)  Hillendale (Racine to College)  Cross Country Ski Trails 9. Please use the back of the survey for any other opinions. What should the City be doing more or less of in regards to parks, recreation, trails and conservation efforts in the community? Responses directed toward parks and conservation that city has control of below:  Add more trails and connections - 12  Dog Park - 9  Increased Police patrol throughout (lakes/litter/dogs/cars) - 6  Consistent park maintenance - 5  Expand park system - 4  Improve Idle Isle - 3  Splashpad - 3  Pave trails - 3  Rebuild Horn baseball - 2  More basketball - 2  Allow dogs in parks - 2  Control invasive buckthorn - 2  Path on Durham to TC Elementary  Path on woods from Durham to TC Elementary  Path from Kelsey to High School on Racine  Path on Hillendale  WE Energies trail should receive more maintenance  Snowshoeing (groomed trail)  More baseball fields  More soccer fields  More tennis  Martin Road trail  Football at Park Arthur  More movies in the park  Ice Skating  Cross Country Ski Trail  More rec events Bluhm Farm Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Aging Pavilion - 3  Poor baseball fields  Update playground  Equipment outdated  More landscaping 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Baseball, playground, rubgy, basketball, football, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Walking/Running - 59  Playground - 42  Baseball - 17  Biking - 8  Sitting - 7  Basketball - 6  Rugby - 4  Pavilion - 3  Walking Dog - 3  Golf -1 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Playground - 18  Pavilion - 11  Ball Field Grass Areas - 10  Trails - 6  Parking Lot - 5  Bleachers - 4  Basketball Hoop in parking lot - 4  Goose Control - 4  Wild Areas (Prairies) - 3  Path in Woods - 2 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  People park for convenience - 6  Dogs off leash - 5  Noise 1  Littering  Bathrooms not open 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Improve Playground - 15  Improve Pavilion - 9  Control Geese Better - 8  Add Better Basketball Court - 4  Splashpad - 4  Trail in woods floods - 3  More Parking - 3  Pave path from Tudor Oaks to Bluhm – 3  Improve baseball fields - 3  More rec/conservation programs - 3  Add Tennis Courts - 2  Improve trails - 2  Ice Skating  Dog Maintenance Center  Remove prairie  Baseball lights  Where is bat house? Denoon Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Needs maintenance - 11  Poor walking paths – 5  Playground upgrades needed – 4  Improve boat launch - 3  Poor subdivision access - 2 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (boating, playground, fishing, basketball, soccer, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Walking/Hiking/Running - 75  Playground - 32  Boating - 20  Fishing - 11  Biking - 10  Basketball - 3  Soccer - 3  Baseball - 2  Picnic 1  Bird Watching  Photography  Golfing  Snowshoeing 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Trails - 22  Boat Launch - 19  Playground - 11  Need bathrooms - 2  Landscaping - 2 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Loitering - 5  Trash - 5  Dogs - 5  Noise - 2 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Improve trails and signage - 21  Improve Boat Launch Area - 20  Add boardwalk by lake - 13  Frisbee Golf - 8  New playground - 7  Allow Pets - 4  Add permanent bathrooms - 4  Tennis Court - 3  Rentable Pavilion - 3  Improved rec trail by homes  Archery Range  Skate Park  Pickleball  Dog Park Freedom Square Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Conditions of courts - 8  Condition of tennis court nets - 2  Do not sell - 2 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (basketball, tennis, other)?  Basketball - 23  Tennis - 15 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Court Surface - 20  Replace Basketball hoops/Tennis netting - 6 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Loitering  Commercial parking 7. The city has found this park to be underutilized for many years? Please indicate your thoughts on the following: Horn, Vets, & Settlement Parks Questions 1. Overall how would you rate these parks?  Horn needs updates 11  Little shade at Vets 2. How often do you use the parks during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (playground, walking/hiking, baseball, historic center visitation, rec events)?  Walking/Hiking - 34  Playground - 27  Rec Events - 8  Baseball - 7  Historic Center - 5  Biking - 3  Dog Walking – 2  Frisbee 4. Which portions of the parks need the most improvement?  Trail Surfaces (wet areas) - 8  Horn Field - 4  Playground at Horn - 4  Historic Buildings - 3  Muskego Fair  Vets Shelter  Parking  Litter 5. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Unleashed dogs – 5  Loitering - 2 6. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of these parks. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 7. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Splashpad - 6  Trail maintenance (wet areas) - 4  Shade at Vet’s Playground - 3  More trails - 2  Bring back dinosaur at Vet’s Playground - 2  Festival Outgrown current venue - 2  Dog Park  Disc Golf  Picnic Areas  Regulate festival  Update Horn baseball field  Exercise Stations  Basketball Court  Less Dogs Idle Isle Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Dirty beach - 5  Goose problem - 4  Need larger beach - 3  Too much trash - 2  Crowded - 2  Not enough parking - 2  Make cleaner - 2  Loitering  Car Noise  Seaweed problem  Open pavilion more  More landscaping  Inconsistent fee collection  Too much parking  More picnic areas 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (beach/swimming, boating, playground, fishing, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Walking/Hiking - 61  Boating - 39  Beach/Swimming - 36  Playground - 34  Fishing - 19  Sitting - 18  Waterbugs - 16  Events - 5  Picnicking - 3  Biking - 2  Ice Skating 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Beach/Swim Area - 37  Boat Launch/Piers - 14  Geese Issue - 11  Shoreline - 10  Playground - 9  Trails around lake - 3  Overall Maintenance – 3  Pavilion - 2  Landscaping  Garbage  Kayaking  Police Enforcement 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Loitering - 4  Litter - 7  Noise (People/cars) - 5  Trespassing  Boat Traffic - 4  Waterbugs - 5 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Beach Enhancement/Enlarge - 26  Shoreline Cleanup - 8  Parking Lot Upkeep/Increase - 3  Remove Geese - 8  More short piers for tie-up  Trail Loop - 20  Improve Playgrounds/Closer to beach - 9  Boat Launch Update - 2  Weeds - 2  Dog cleanup station  Landscaping Beautification - 2  Rentals (paddleboards/kayaks) - 17  Increase fees - 6  Concessions - 4  Litter Control/Trash Cans - 6  Volleyball  Horse Shoe Pits  Lifeguard - 2  Ice Skating  Police Enforcement - 4 Jensen & Lee Hubka Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Poorly maintained – 3  Cracked asphalt/weedy  Rec Building needs updates  Remove dead trees  Better playground  Condition of ballfield poor  No amenities 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Baseball, playground, basketball, rec building programs, channel access, etc.)?  Playground - 21  Basketball - 14  Baseball/Softball - 11  Walking - 6  Dog Walking - 3  Channel Access - 2  Biking  Picnic  Rec Programs 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Baseball Diamond/Bleachers – 13  Playground - 9  Basketball Courts - 5  Rec Building - 5  Need Benches - 2  Channel  Need Landscaping 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Loitering 11  Dogs 11  Off road vehicle usage  Parking issues 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Improve Channel Access - 10  Tennis Courts - 6  New Playground - 4  Improve Basketball Courts - 3  Improve Baseball Field - 3  Add Parking- 3  Picnic Tables/Benches - 2  Allow Dogs - 2  Improve Building - 2  Better Maintenance  Ice Skating  Improve Bleachers  Pool  Remove Rec Building  Pavilion  Grills  Pickleball Kurth Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Parking issues  Playground fair  Can’t walk dog  Not up to date 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Baseball, playground, walking, basketball, tennis, soccer, etc.)?  Walking - 36  Playground - 20  Tennis - 13  Soccer - 9  Basketball - 6  Baseball - 6  Dog Walking - 2 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Trails - 12  Playground - 7  Parking - 4  Basketball Court - 3  Tennis Courts - 3  Bathrooms - 3  Baseball Field - 2  Southern Soccer Field - 2  More Garbage Cans  Accessibility 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Parking/Traffic - 5  Dogs - 3  Rude parents - 2 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Dog Park/Allowance - 12  Update/Add Trails - 7  Playground - 5  Actual Basketball Court - 3  Dog Regulation - 3  Better Parking - 2  Create Shoreline - 2  Better Bathrooms  Weed Control  Refurbish Tennis Court  Loitering Enforcement  Prairie Signage  Splash pad/Swimming pool Lions Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Upgrade baseball field - 3  Improve playground - 2  Parking larger - 2  Nothing here  Eyesore  No level playfield  Increased security 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Playground, pickleball, baseball, football, sitting, etc.)?  Playground - 19  Pickleball - 11  Baseball - 11  Basketball - 9  Walking - 3  Football - 3  Kite Flying - 2  Festival  Soccer  Frisbee 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Weeding/Landscaping/Landscape Maintenance/Drainage - 7  Baseball Field - 4  Parking - 4  Lighting - 2  More Benches - 2  Fencing - 2  Basketball  Playground  Concession/Bathrooms 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Street parking congestion - 3  Pet Issues  Loitering 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  More landscaping - 2  Volleyball  Lawncare  Soccer field  Camping  Disc Golf practice area  Benches/Picnic tables  Walking trails  Bathroom updates  More parking Manchester Hill Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Playground updates needed - 5  Litter  Dog issues 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Playground, soccer, walking, pavilion, ice skating, fishing, etc.)?  Walking - 44  Playground - 40  Pond/Fishing – 19  Soccer - 7  Ice Skating - 6  Trail  Baseball  Shelter 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Pond Area Shore - 10  Bathrooms (Add permanent) - 8  Playground - 8  Trails (Especially around pond) - 6  Winter Pond maintenance (lights/benches) - 2  Pavilion/Picnic Tables - 2  Parking Lot  Play Area Surface  Dog Mess 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Loitering - 2  Dangerous parking  Dogs  Litter 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Fishing/Stocking/Pier - 10  Pond Improvement - 7  Permanent Restrooms - 7  Trail Improvement - 6  Playground Update - 4  Ice Skate Access/Lighting - 4  Cleanout Tree line - 2  Better Landscaping - 2  Add Dog Park  Pavilion Upgrade  Accessibility  More Landscaping  Soccer Fields  Dog Regulation Moorland Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Not enough activities/amenities - 5  Soccer and open fields poorly maintained – 4  Not attractive - 3  More Police patrol - 2  Poor bathroom facilities 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Playground, skateboard park, soccer, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Playground - 63  Walking/Hiking - 48  Soccer - 22  Sitting - 14  Skateboard Park - 8  Biking - 4  Birding 1  Pond 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  More landscaping/shade - 11  Permanent Bathrooms - 10  Soccer Fields (Weedy/uneven) - 7  Woodchips at playground - 6  Trail maintenance - 3  Add pavilion – 3  Add basketball - 2  Splashpad - 2  Improved Signage  More trail signage  Litter Cleanup  Remove prairie by roadways  More benches  Better behavior 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Loitering (Skatepark behavior) -14  Littering - 2 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  More landscaping/shade - 21  Pavilion w/ perm. bathrooms – 21  Splashpad - 19  Bocce Ball Courts - 14  Pickleball - 10  Trail Maintenance/Signage - 9  Benches/Picnic tables - 6  Basketball - 2  Pond Fishing - 2  Dog Park - 2  Tennis - 2  Ice Rink  Baseball Park Arthur Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  Need Playground - 2  More Trails – 2 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Baseball, archery, sledding, walking, hiking, equestrian, other, etc.)?  Walking/Hiking/Running - 42  Sledding - 15  Baseball - 15  Biking – 4  Archery - 4  Walk Dog - 3  Geo Caching  Birding 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Grass - 9  Edges of Roads/Muddy/Boulders - 6  More landscaping/trees - 5  Add Playground - 4  Speed Deterrence - 3  Better Trails - 3  Archery Range - 2  Picnic Areas - 2  Improve path up sledding hill -1  Litter Cleanup  Geese Issues  Sledding Hill Slope  Sidewalk from Copper Oaks Subdivision 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Speeding - 6  Loitering  Lights on too long  Horse Cleanup  Littering 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. The west side of Park Arthur is undeveloped. Please indicate what item(s) you would favor in the future: 9. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  Add playground - 15  Add more trails - 13  Dog Park - 12  Ice Rink - 9  Football - 5  More Landscaping/Shade - 4  Picnic Space - 3  Soccer - 3  Bike Trails  Picnic Space - 3  Soccer - 3  Scoreboards - 2  Basketball Court  Splashpad  Snowshoeing  Tennis  Swim Pond  Pitching/Hitting Cages  Overseeding Fields  More Police Patrol Schmidt Park Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this park?  No prairie grass -3  Dangerous equipment  More trash cans  More sitting areas  More trees  Better basketball court  Better upkeep 2. How often do you use the park during the months April-November? 3. What amenities do you go to the park for usually (Playground, tennis, basketball, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Walking - 72  Playground - 58  Tennis - 35  Sitting - 19  Basketball - 17  Baseball - 13  Dog Walking - 6  Biking - 4  Picnic - 2  Golf  Snowshoeing 4. Which portions of the park need the most improvement?  Playground - 18  Tennis Courts - 15  Ball Field - 12  Remove Prairie - 9  Basketball Court - 8  Add Benches/Picnic Tables - 7  Lawn Maintenance - 4  More Trees - 3  More Trash Containers 5. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the park? 6. Have you had any problems with other park users?  Dogs and dogs unleashed/cleanup - 7  Loitering – 7 7. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this park. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 8. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the park more in the future?  More landscaping/shade - 7  Pickleball in Tennis Courts - 2  Add benches/picnic tables - 10  Enhance Basketball Court - 9  Enhance Tennis Court - 8  Update Playground - 6  Remove Prairie – 6  Enhance Baseball Field - 6  Add Soccer Goal/Field - 4  Enforce Dogs or Allow - 4  Splash pad - 2  Add water fountain  No Parking Lot  Fix Tennis Courts  Trails thru Prairie area  Volleyball Badertscher Preserve Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this conservation area? 2. How often do you use the area during the months April-November? 3. How often do you use the area during the winter months? 4. What amenities do you go to the conservation area for usually (Hiking, bird-watching, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Walking/Hiking - 21  Sitting - 2  Bird Watching - 2  Snow Shoeing 5. Which portions of the conservation area need the most improvement?  More signs to keep off private property  Clean up dead growth  Mow trails in summer more 6. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the area? 7. Have you had any problems with other conservation area users?  Dog ignorance - 2  Camouflaged hunters 8. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this area. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 9. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the area more in the future?  Fill in muddy trail areas (woodchips/boardwalk) - 3  Educational Signs and Improved Signage - 2  More trail cutting  Paved parking  Observation Platform  Curb late night traffic  Aid steeper slopes  Rules but no enforcement  Have self-guided tours  Add kids playset Engel Conservation Area Questions 1. Overall how would you rate this conservation area? 2. How often do you use the area during the months April-November? 3. How often do you use the area during the winter months? 4. What amenities do you go to the conservation area for usually (Hiking, bird-watching, walking, sitting, other, etc.)?  Hiking/Walking - 13  Bird Watching - 6  Snowshoeing - 3  Sitting  Photography 5. Which portions of the conservation area need the most improvement?  Walking paths - 6  Gravel Road - 2  Signage  Fish Stocking  More views to water 6. Are there enough parking spaces provided for the size of the area? 7. Have you had any problems with other conservation area users?  Kids after hours - 2  Ignorance of no dogs - 2  Shining deer - 2  Late night traffic 8. The following improvements have been thought of for the future of this area. Please indicate below if you would favor such an improvement or not. 9. Would any of the possible improvements make you want to visit the area more in the future?  Improve trails - 4  Add outdoor education center - 2  Add land - 2  Paved Road and parking lot  Improve subdivision access (settlement and Woodland Creek Subdivisions)  Open for hunting ducks/squirrel  Stock Pond  Archery Range CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Parks & Conservation Committee June 8, 2016 Meeting To: Parks and Conservation Committee From: Jeff Muenkel, CEcD AICP EDFP Subject: New Parks and Conservation Plan Review Date: June 2, 2016 Tonight we would like to focus on the recommendations section of the Parks and Conservation Plan. Staff has attached the latest chapter of the recommendations for Committee perusal. Please note that the pdf map attachments have breakout pages for the recommendations for easier viewing and zooming in. We should work to go thru all the recommendations and add/remove any last recommendations before we send the plan off for official adoption before the Council. Please note that staff has added the recommendations that were pertinent thus far from the survey results. Thus, we imagine the focus will be on new recommendations based on the survey results. Also, we will want to take a look at the future trail recommendations as well. We can also discuss any last thoughts on additions/removals from any other part of the Plan tonight as well. In all, staff hopes to have a motion tonight to forward the Plan on for the adoption process contingent on any changes the Committee discusses tonight. City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDATIONS The previous chapters presented an inventory and analysis of how well the existing parks, open space sites, and trails meet the needs of the current and future population of the City of Muskego. The next step in the planning process is to make recommendations to fulfill the identified needs. These can include additional facilities at existing sites, land acquisition, land sales, and/or development of facilities at proposed park and open space sites. This recommended plan will serve as a guide in the decision making process in the acquisition and development of parks and open spaces in the City of Muskego for the next five years. City staff and the Parks and Conservation Committee will utilize this plan for yearly park/conservation budgeting and prioritization efforts. The following recommendations are separated into the three main categories of parks, open spaces, and trails. The recommendations are further categorized in relation to the overall city as well as the individual parks, open spaces, and trails themselves. Further, this plan digs deeper into each recommendation by providing cost approximations and cost sharing/saving options where applicable. The sites and facilities proposed in this chapter should provide a park and open space system that meets the needs of the future population of Muskego. Park Recommendations General Recommendations The following recommendations are considered general in nature and intended to apply broadly in relation to the overall park system. 1. Based on the Parks and Conservation Survey for this Plan the following considerations should be discussed over this Plan’s planning period:  Consideration to add the following to the parks system: a. Splashpad b. Disc Golf c. Ice Skating d. Allowance of Dogs e. Dog Park f. More Trails g. More Shade Trees in key areas 2. The Parks and Conservation Survey noted that one underserved areas for parks include downtown Muskego and the Big Muskego Lake area. 3. Identify active use parks for clustering outdoor athletic facilities and continue discussions on partnering with rec clubs school district for development of more clustered indoor/outdoor facilities. 4. Continue discussions with school district for determining public use times/access for indoor/outdoor athletic facilities. 5. Funding for Parks Acquisitions and Developments: New land developments are required to dedicate park and open space lands where designated by the Comprehensive Plan or any plan component (i.e. this Plan). If an area of development does not encompass a planned park or open space then a fee in lieu of park dedication is imposed. These monies are collected in a segregated account for acquisition and development purposes. 6. The current landfill agreement between the City of Muskego and Superior Emerald Park Landfill (now Veolia Environmental Services) requires that not less than 10% of City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan the city’s annual direct payment is directed to the park dedication fund. This plan recommends the continued terms of this agreement with consideration of also utilizing some funds from the unallocated portion of the annual direct payment to further assist in park development and acquisition. 7. Actively pursued federal, state, and private grants to financially assist the acquisitio n and management of parklands. 8. Update and market Adopt-a-Park Program. Ensure groups continually committed every year and assuming clean up duties. 9. Urban Forestry Recommendations for Parks: All forestry planning and operations within city parks should follow recommendations outlined within the adopted City of Muskego Urban Forestry Strategic and Management Plans. These plans provide recommendations for the establishment and management of the tree population within the city’s parks. The Urban Forestry Strategic Plan establishes the goals and objectives of the city’s urban forestry program. The Management Plan provides recommendations for staff, equipment, and training. This plan also outlines a timeline for specific tree management activities such as planting and pruning and projects a five-year budget to complete the recommended activities. Specific Park Recommendations The park recommendations are presented in a graphical format and can be found outlined on maps ___-___ herein below. Lake Access Recommendations The lake access sites recommendations for Little Muskego Lake, Big Muskeg o Lake, and Lake Denoon can be found below in relation to overall and specific site recommendations. Little Muskego Lake Access Sites: Overall Recs-  Renumber sites due to changes in past year  Consider picnic tables and/or permanent benches at vista accesses  Consider split rail fencing better denoting property accesses in most locations  Have all launches have the same uniformed signage Pearl Drive  Keep as Lake Access #1  City mows/maintains  Cleanup lake frontage; make access sign more apparent  Cleanup brush along Pearl Drive frontage; move access sign to roadway where it can be seen.  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Emerald Drive  Keep as Lake Access #2  Remove pine tree along Emerald  Has small removable pier (by PW)  Remove overgrown brush (vines) and small trees along lake frontage  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Diamond Drive  Keep as Lake Access #3  Has great frontage that could use string trimming up to shoreline  Good area for fishing rec program due to deeper depths and island here City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan  Have pier section here for increased fishing  Add new picnic table  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Ruby Drive  Make Lake Access #4, was Lake Access #5  Not much use  Could be a good, calm exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking  Frontage brush cleanup and/or tree trimming would be needed Pleasant View Drive (LAUNCH)  Make Lake Access #5, was Lake Access #15  Boat Launch here where people pay launch fees/have stickers  Beautiful Vista (only one on east side of lake)  Room here to make seating area/picnic table  Increase launch sticker patrols; however, no parking at this launch as is  Too much signage/references old code numbers; have all launches have the same uniformed signage; add access point sign here  Paybox cleanup (no maintenance stone base around paybox/sign)  Cement approach on launch in great condition  Weed conveyor sits here during summer months.  Financial partner possible here (LML District) Schubring Drive  Make Lake Access #6, was Lake Access #14  Path entrance under forest canopy; clean up brush in forest; define path  Access actually includes open land along west property line. Define with split rail fence and maintain  Remove garbage can and old jet ski lift  Nice picnic table here; add permanent bench Center Drive  Make Lake Access #7, wasn’t numbered in past  Tree near frontage needs removal  Very nice access with no immediate needs  Has pier for docking boats; people dock and walk to Janesville Road from here Michi Drive  Make Lake Access #8, was Lake Access #13  Define with split rail fencing as this access is tough to navigate  Remove island of brush on south side and return to mow able grade or riprap  Clean out brush and invasive brush along trail on north end all the way to lake edge  Remove large ash tree  Not too desirable of a view/access Park Drive  Make Lake Access #9, was Lake Access #12  Area for parking  Whole access from road could use upkeep.  Path to frontage has failing asphalt and hard to maintain edges; remove stone and weeds and replant with long grasses around trail City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan  Stairwell down to frontage in disrepair; consider removal of all railroad ties/asphalt and return to turf. Flatten out area at base by pier for picnic table or permanent bench.  Clean up treeline of invasive/junk brush  Make vista more manageable; access sign seen from lake  Move pier lower if stairwell grade is redone Kingston Drive  Make Lake Access #10, was Lake Access #16  -Small pier; everything in good condition as is Lincoln Drive  Make Lake Access #11, was Lake Access #17  Picnic table here in good condition  Do snowmobiles enter here? If so, make more known (signage); current signage denotes no motorized vehicles. Oak Grove Drive  Make Lake Access #12, was Lake Access #11  Smallest access at 13 feet wide; noted on access signs  Good shape and maintained  Remove No parking signs on telephone poles along oak Grove (put up by neighbors) Oak Court (LAUNCH)  Make Lake Access #13, was Lake Access #9  Boat Launch here where people pay launch fees/have stickers  Increase launch sticker patrols; however, no parking at this launch as is  Too much signage/references old code numbers; have all launches have the same uniformed signage; add access point sign here  Cement approach on launch in good condition with cracking; consider replacement in 5 years  Weed conveyor sits here during summer months and there is not ample room for conveyor and launching of boats  Widen launch; can clean up west side with less maintenance material (currently weeds and could be groomed gravel); could use east side space to make bigger as city owns while homeowner maintains  Re-riprap culvert area/clean up weeds  Paybox cleanup  Improve approach to lake frontage when widening  -Look for financial partners (LML District) Shore Drive  Make Lake Access #14, was Lake Access #8  Large pier with lifts for Police boat and Police wave runner  Gravel parking area along road for Police; consider paving in future  Clean up lake frontage; removal of cattails in full or at least around pier access  Neighbor dumping of vegetation has occurred by frontage that needs cleanup  Cleanup of lake frontage will make lake access sign more apparent for lake users  -Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan Lochcrest Blvd  Make Lake Access #15, was Lake Access #10  People can park at end of Lochcrest  Remove bad tree that can fall toward lake frontage  -Lake access sign needed at end of Shore Lane; maybe Lochcrest west as well (This area is around private lots though?)  Water frontage has nice pier (ownership unknown)  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Hillview Drive (LAUNCH)  Make Lake Access #16, was Lake Access #7  Boat Launch here where people pay launch fees/have stickers  Increase launch sticker patrols; however, no parking at this launch as is  Neighbors private subdivision lake frontage lot adjoining to north  Lake access not numbered or signed well here; have all launches have the same uniformed signage; add access point sign here  Cement approach on launch in good condition with cracking; consider replacement in 5 years  Weed conveyor sits here during summer months with ample room for launch traffic Lee Hubka Park  Have sign denoting “LML Channel Access #1” (instead of old Lake Access #4) and have Silver Creek be Channel Access #2 instead of “Lake Access” point.  Possible bike racks  Clean channel access  Survey use of basketball  Encouraging parking may not be best idea for neighbors Silver Drive  Access to Dam along LML Channel; Dam pending removal from WDNR  Remove invasive brush along creek outlet along owned area  Remove old electric box (WE Energies?)  Define boundaries better for public and neighbors benefit; Possibly define access with fence line to avoid west neighbor property issue  -Have sign denoting “LML Channel Access #2” (instead of old Lake Access #19) and have Lee Hubka Park be Channel Access #1 instead of “Lake Access” point. Idle Isle Park  See Idle Isle Park recommendations per Map ___. Big Muskego Lake Access Sites: Boxhorn Boat Launch  City owns storage building on east end; consider selling to Boxhorn Gun Club but preserve easement to launch  Redo Signage by launch City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan  Cleanup around sign (use no-maintenance materials in future; stone)  Remove dumpster  Remove concrete blocks and tower around dumpster  Consider adding new boardwalk with fishing/docking/viewing pier on south side of existing boat launch pier; would allow area boats to dock and visit commercial entity as well; commercial entity cost sharing?  Add new port-a-john plus structure surround  Have local commercial entity enclose their dumpsters per code Durham Boat Launch  Remove dumpster  Make area low maintenance (no mowing)  Add new port-a-john plus structure surround  Remove small pole light along front north portion of launch area; Consider adding a couple lights to tornado pole to spread light over balance of parking lot.  Remove post (w/out sign) by pier  Remove split rail that is deteriorating around parking lot.  Clean up brush around parking lot (push brush back a bit that is encroaching)  Add better directional signage from overflow lot to main launch (have people cross Durham and use trail, not private lot owners lots).  Clean up brush along Durham for better view corridors. Lake Denoon Access Site (See Map ___ for Denoon Park) City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 38 City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 38 City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 51 Conservation Recommendations General Recommendations The following recommendations are considered general in nature and intended to apply broadly in relation to the overall conservation system. 1. Any conservation effort should work to meet the following guidelines:  Preservation of rural character  Preservation of native plant communities  Protection of wildlife habitat  Creation of passive and active outdoor recreation opportunities  Reduced development sprawl and overall population density  Reduced vehicular traffic  Reduced stormwater runoff and flooding  Cleaner surface waters  Groundwater recharge  Air pollution reduction 2. Based on the Parks and Conservation Survey for this Plan the following considerations should be discussed over this Plan’s planning period:  Consideration for snowshoe and cross country ski trails  Consideration for conservation workshops/conservation events  Consideration for outdoor education center  Consideration to allow dogs in conservation areas 3. A prioritization of environmental lands in the community can be found on Map ___. These lands should be considered for conservation efforts as developments or land remediation efforts are requested. Areas identified by SEWRPC as natural areas, critical species habitats, environmental corridors, and isolated natural resource areas are all included. Essentially all wetlands and older-growth forest areas of significant size are also included in the prioritization. The most important factor considered in the ranking is the ecological significance; the diversity of the plant community and quality of wildlife habitat. The size of an ecologically significant land area also plays a role in ranking as larger contiguous tracts of habitat typically support a greater diversity of plants and wildlife. The lands are divided into high, medium, and low conservation priority areas per the following:  High Conservation Priority Areas: Lands classified as a “High Conservation Priority” are generally larger tracts of land with higher quality environmental features such as older growth forests or larger, contiguous wetland areas. Land areas that provide continuity between large tracts of high quality environmental features are also included. Strong consideration should be given to acquiring lands in this designation should they become available. Those lands not acquired should be protected through other conservation planning techniques.  Medium Conservation Priority Areas: These lands are basically a continuum between high conservation priority areas and the low conservation priority areas described below. Tracts are moderately sized and/or the environmental features that they contain may be of somewhat lower quality than those designated as high priority.  Low Conservation Priority Areas: These land areas are generally smaller tracts of environmental features. This designation includes drained or degraded wetlands or lower quality woodlands. Also included are extensively fragmented, City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021 52 older-growth woodland areas that remain after previous subdivision or other development of land. In most cases, low conservation priority lands would be protected through means other than acquisition - such as isolated wetlands that are protected through state and federal land use regulations. 4. Planning Process for Conserving Prioritized Lands: This Plan recommends that the city consider conservation of all prioritized areas. While it is certainl y not feasible to acquire these lands through fee simple purchase they may be preserved through land dedications, conservation easements, preservation restrictions, conservation developments, or other means. The Parks and Conservation Committee shall review all land division and land development proposals that would affect conservation priority areas. With staff guidance, the Committee shall recommend a strategy to the Planning Commission and the Common Council to preserve or minimize the development impact of such lands. 5. Conservation lands should be managed in a manner to preserve and enhance their ecological quality. Invasive species control and establishment of native plant communities are requisite in the stewardship of conservation lands. It is recommended that the City of Muskego continue to maintain a separate planning document, Management of City of Muskego Conservation Lands, in addition to this document to outline specific management for the conservation lands that it owns. This document shall include a work plan with a prioritization and timeline for completing the recommended conservation management activities. 6. The current landfill agreement between the City of Muskego and Veolia Environmental Services Emerald Park Landfill Incorporated requires that 10% of the city’s annual direct payment is directed to a Land and Open Space Conservation Fund to purchase land and/or conservation easements that will provide for open space preservation. This Plan recommends the continued terms of this agreement with consideration of also utilizing some additional funds from the unallocated portion of the annual direct payment to further assist in conservation acquisitions. Similarly fees in lieu of land dedications should continue to be collected as a funding source for land acquisition. 7. It is recommended that the city maintain a specific budget for land management and facilities development costs. Sources for this funding could include the unallocated portion of the landfill settlement fund, the city’s general fund, state and federal grants, and private sources. To fund special projects the city also should seek partnerships and financial assistance from private conservation organizations, local lake districts and associations, local service groups, and scou ting groups in the area. 8. It is recommended that efforts be made to recruit volunteers to help the community meet its conservation objectives. Involving the community will raise a sense of stewardship for the city’s natural resources. Volunteer activities can range from assisting in land management tasks such as tree planting, seed collection, or invasive plant control, to fundraising efforts. Existing partnerships with scout groups and students should continue and new partnerships with conservation-related associations and groups should be sought. 9. The City Conservation Coordinator should maintain a capacity of consultation to the community on conservation related issues. Outdoor education classes and special events should periodically be offered through the city’s recreation programming. 10. In cases where residential development will occur within wooded areas, measures should be taken to minimize the removal of trees and adequately protect the trees that are to remain. Building envelopes should be established and preservation restrictions placed upon the lands outside of the development area. Steps should also be taken to alleviate any construction damage outside of the cleared area. City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021 53 11. Promotion of conservation sites: Citizens should become aware of conservation sites in the city so that they can be visited and appreciated. Modest signage should be placed at each of the smaller sites. An “Adopt a Conservation Site” could be started where neighboring residents would help with land management activities and develop a sense of stewardship for the site. 12. Big Muskego Lake State Wildlife: It is recommended that the City of Muskego and the Big Muskego Lake/Bass Bay Protection and Rehabilitation District collaborate with the Wisconsin DNR in continuing to acquire/manage key parcels to protect the best remaining lands in the project area and create larger contiguous conservancy areas around Big Muskego Lake. Specific Open Space Recommendations The recommendations for the two primary recreationally active conservation sites (Engel Conservation Area and Badertscher Preserve) can be found via Maps ___& ___. City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 54 City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 54 City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021 55 City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021 55 City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 56 Trail Recommendations General Recommendations The following recommendations are considered general in nature and intended to apply broadly in relation to the overall trail system. 1. Recreation trails are extensions of the transportation system of the city that are intended for the use of non-motorized modes of travel. Most recreation trail facilities are located within existing or planned rights-of-way while others traverse public land holdings or are located within land easements from private owners. These facilities should serve to link the City of Muskego together with a system of safe and functional off-street recreation trail connections to accommodate such activities as walking, running, biking, cross- country skiing, in-line skating, and hiking. 2. Recreation trails are proposed to follow road rights-of-way, utility corridors, and easements to facilitate travel within the city and also connect to trails in adjoining communities as part of a regional trail network. 3. It is recommended that future subdivision and other land developments construct proposed trail sections that are adjacent to or within their proposed development area. 4. Trails should have a paved surface in urbanized areas and conform to the specifications provided by the City’s Public Works Department. 5. Inspections should take place at least bi-annually on all Muskego trails to determine if ay sections are deteriorating so plans for repairs can be made and/or budgeted for. 6. Future trail additions to the City of Muskego trail system are found on Map ___. The future trails have a priority level based upon past committee and Council discussions. The Parks and Conservation Committee shall utilize this map annually before budget time to recommend any new trail design and/or construction. Trail recommendations shall be made based on public demand, trail loop connections in the community, and as road construction projects take place. Planning/design for any new trail is recommended to commence at least one year earlier then construction (NOTE: Any trail segment addition to the community is solely up to the Council and their annually prioritization schedule). 7. Based on the Parks and Conservation survey the following trail sections should be given consideration for installation to complete loops and link residents to the overall system: a. Add a trail on Racine Avenue south of High School to south end of city b. Add trail on Woods from Durham to Tess Corners 8. The Parks and Conservation survey as part of this Plan looked to have more annual maintenance procedures with our existing trail system as well as calling for more trials in the community to be paved. 9. Update Adopt-a-Trail Program and promote. Ensure groups continually committed every year and assuming clean up duties. Specific Trail Recommendations Individual recommendations for our a few specific trail systems, including the WE En ergies tail systems, are found here: WE Energies North Trail -Continue to have Public Works install millings throughout whole trail as materials are acquired. -Remedy trail area crossing of County Hwy L by substation near Stagecoach Inn bar. Better signage as well as finding a way to wrap trail around substation better in future instead of having users go down highway for a couple hundred feet. -Have new signage plan along trail system: City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 57 City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDATIONS The previous chapters presented an inventory and analysis of how well the existing parks, open space sites, and trails meet the needs of the current and future population of the City of Muskego. The next step in the planning process is to make recommendations to fulfill the identified needs. These can include additional facilities at existing sites, land acquisition, land sales, and/or development of facilities at proposed park and open space sites. This recommended plan will serve as a guide in the decision making process in the acquisition and development of parks and open spaces in the City of Muskego for the next five years. City staff and the Parks and Conservation Committee will utilize this plan for yearly park/conservation budgeting and prioritization efforts. The following recommendations are separated into the three main categories of parks, open spaces, and trails. The recommendations are further categorized in relation to the overall city as well as the individual parks, open spaces, and trails themselves. Further, this plan digs deeper into each recommendation by providing cost approximations and cost sharing/saving options where applicable. The sites and facilities proposed in this chapter should provide a park and open space system that meets the needs of the future population of Muskego. Park Recommendations General Recommendations The following recommendations are considered general in nature and intended to apply broadly in relation to the overall park system. 1. Based on the Parks and Conservation Survey for this Plan the following considerations should be discussed over this Plan’s planning period:  Consideration to add the following to the parks system: a. Splashpad b. Disc Golf c. Ice Skating d. Allowance of Dogs e. Dog Park f. More Trails g. More Shade Trees in key areas 2. The Parks and Conservation Survey noted that one underserved areas for parks include downtown Muskego and the Big Muskego Lake area. 3. Identify active use parks for clustering outdoor athletic facilities and continue discussions on partnering with rec clubs school district for development of more clustered indoor/outdoor facilities. 4. Continue discussions with school district for determining public use times/access for indoor/outdoor athletic facilities. 5. Funding for Parks Acquisitions and Developments: New land developments are required to dedicate park and open space lands where designated by the Comprehensive Plan or any plan component (i.e. this Plan). If an area of development does not encompass a planned park or open space then a fee in lieu of park dedication is imposed. These monies are collected in a segregated account for acquisition and development purposes. 6. The current landfill agreement between the City of Muskego and Superior Emerald Park Landfill (now Veolia Environmental Services) requires that not less than 10% of City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan the city’s annual direct payment is directed to the park dedication fund. This plan recommends the continued terms of this agreement with consideration of also utilizing some funds from the unallocated portion of the annual direct payment to further assist in park development and acquisition. 7. Actively pursued federal, state, and private grants to financially assist the acquisitio n and management of parklands. 8. Update and market Adopt-a-Park Program. Ensure groups continually committed every year and assuming clean up duties. 9. Urban Forestry Recommendations for Parks: All forestry planning and operations within city parks should follow recommendations outlined within the adopted City of Muskego Urban Forestry Strategic and Management Plans. These plans provide recommendations for the establishment and management of the tree population within the city’s parks. The Urban Forestry Strategic Plan establishes the goals and objectives of the city’s urban forestry program. The Management Plan provides recommendations for staff, equipment, and training. This plan also outlines a timeline for specific tree management activities such as planting and pruning and projects a five-year budget to complete the recommended activities. Specific Park Recommendations The park recommendations are presented in a graphical format and can be found outlined on maps ___-___ herein below. Lake Access Recommendations The lake access sites recommendations for Little Muskego Lake, Big Muskeg o Lake, and Lake Denoon can be found below in relation to overall and specific site recommendations. Little Muskego Lake Access Sites: Overall Recs-  Renumber sites due to changes in past year  Consider picnic tables and/or permanent benches at vista accesses  Consider split rail fencing better denoting property accesses in most locations  Have all launches have the same uniformed signage Pearl Drive  Keep as Lake Access #1  City mows/maintains  Cleanup lake frontage; make access sign more apparent  Cleanup brush along Pearl Drive frontage; move access sign to roadway where it can be seen.  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Emerald Drive  Keep as Lake Access #2  Remove pine tree along Emerald  Has small removable pier (by PW)  Remove overgrown brush (vines) and small trees along lake frontage  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Diamond Drive  Keep as Lake Access #3  Has great frontage that could use string trimming up to shoreline  Good area for fishing rec program due to deeper depths and island here City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan  Have pier section here for increased fishing  Add new picnic table  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Ruby Drive  Make Lake Access #4, was Lake Access #5  Not much use  Could be a good, calm exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking  Frontage brush cleanup and/or tree trimming would be needed Pleasant View Drive (LAUNCH)  Make Lake Access #5, was Lake Access #15  Boat Launch here where people pay launch fees/have stickers  Beautiful Vista (only one on east side of lake)  Room here to make seating area/picnic table  Increase launch sticker patrols; however, no parking at this launch as is  Too much signage/references old code numbers; have all launches have the same uniformed signage; add access point sign here  Paybox cleanup (no maintenance stone base around paybox/sign)  Cement approach on launch in great condition  Weed conveyor sits here during summer months.  Financial partner possible here (LML District) Schubring Drive  Make Lake Access #6, was Lake Access #14  Path entrance under forest canopy; clean up brush in forest; define path  Access actually includes open land along west property line. Define with split rail fence and maintain  Remove garbage can and old jet ski lift  Nice picnic table here; add permanent bench Center Drive  Make Lake Access #7, wasn’t numbered in past  Tree near frontage needs removal  Very nice access with no immediate needs  Has pier for docking boats; people dock and walk to Janesville Road from here Michi Drive  Make Lake Access #8, was Lake Access #13  Define with split rail fencing as this access is tough to navigate  Remove island of brush on south side and return to mow able grade or riprap  Clean out brush and invasive brush along trail on north end all the way to lake edge  Remove large ash tree  Not too desirable of a view/access Park Drive  Make Lake Access #9, was Lake Access #12  Area for parking  Whole access from road could use upkeep.  Path to frontage has failing asphalt and hard to maintain edges; remove stone and weeds and replant with long grasses around trail City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan  Stairwell down to frontage in disrepair; consider removal of all railroad ties/asphalt and return to turf. Flatten out area at base by pier for picnic table or permanent bench.  Clean up treeline of invasive/junk brush  Make vista more manageable; access sign seen from lake  Move pier lower if stairwell grade is redone Kingston Drive  Make Lake Access #10, was Lake Access #16  -Small pier; everything in good condition as is Lincoln Drive  Make Lake Access #11, was Lake Access #17  Picnic table here in good condition  Do snowmobiles enter here? If so, make more known (signage); current signage denotes no motorized vehicles. Oak Grove Drive  Make Lake Access #12, was Lake Access #11  Smallest access at 13 feet wide; noted on access signs  Good shape and maintained  Remove No parking signs on telephone poles along oak Grove (put up by neighbors) Oak Court (LAUNCH)  Make Lake Access #13, was Lake Access #9  Boat Launch here where people pay launch fees/have stickers  Increase launch sticker patrols; however, no parking at this launch as is  Too much signage/references old code numbers; have all launches have the same uniformed signage; add access point sign here  Cement approach on launch in good condition with cracking; consider replacement in 5 years  Weed conveyor sits here during summer months and there is not ample room for conveyor and launching of boats  Widen launch; can clean up west side with less maintenance material (currently weeds and could be groomed gravel); could use east side space to make bigger as city owns while homeowner maintains  Re-riprap culvert area/clean up weeds  Paybox cleanup  Improve approach to lake frontage when widening  -Look for financial partners (LML District) Shore Drive  Make Lake Access #14, was Lake Access #8  Large pier with lifts for Police boat and Police wave runner  Gravel parking area along road for Police; consider paving in future  Clean up lake frontage; removal of cattails in full or at least around pier access  Neighbor dumping of vegetation has occurred by frontage that needs cleanup  Cleanup of lake frontage will make lake access sign more apparent for lake users  -Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan Lochcrest Blvd  Make Lake Access #15, was Lake Access #10  People can park at end of Lochcrest  Remove bad tree that can fall toward lake frontage  -Lake access sign needed at end of Shore Lane; maybe Lochcrest west as well (This area is around private lots though?)  Water frontage has nice pier (ownership unknown)  Another good exploited access for paddle boarding/kayaking Hillview Drive (LAUNCH)  Make Lake Access #16, was Lake Access #7  Boat Launch here where people pay launch fees/have stickers  Increase launch sticker patrols; however, no parking at this launch as is  Neighbors private subdivision lake frontage lot adjoining to north  Lake access not numbered or signed well here; have all launches have the same uniformed signage; add access point sign here  Cement approach on launch in good condition with cracking; consider replacement in 5 years  Weed conveyor sits here during summer months with ample room for launch traffic Lee Hubka Park  Have sign denoting “LML Channel Access #1” (instead of old Lake Access #4) and have Silver Creek be Channel Access #2 instead of “Lake Access” point.  Possible bike racks  Clean channel access  Survey use of basketball  Encouraging parking may not be best idea for neighbors Silver Drive  Access to Dam along LML Channel; Dam pending removal from WDNR  Remove invasive brush along creek outlet along owned area  Remove old electric box (WE Energies?)  Define boundaries better for public and neighbors benefit; Possibly define access with fence line to avoid west neighbor property issue  -Have sign denoting “LML Channel Access #2” (instead of old Lake Access #19) and have Lee Hubka Park be Channel Access #1 instead of “Lake Access” point. Idle Isle Park  See Idle Isle Park recommendations per Map ___. Big Muskego Lake Access Sites: Boxhorn Boat Launch  City owns storage building on east end; consider selling to Boxhorn Gun Club but preserve easement to launch  Redo Signage by launch City of Muskego Parks, Conservation, & Recreation Plan  Cleanup around sign (use no-maintenance materials in future; stone)  Remove dumpster  Remove concrete blocks and tower around dumpster  Consider adding new boardwalk with fishing/docking/viewing pier on south side of existing boat launch pier; would allow area boats to dock and visit commercial entity as well; commercial entity cost sharing?  Add new port-a-john plus structure surround  Have local commercial entity enclose their dumpsters per code Durham Boat Launch  Remove dumpster  Make area low maintenance (no mowing)  Add new port-a-john plus structure surround  Remove small pole light along front north portion of launch area; Consider adding a couple lights to tornado pole to spread light over balance of parking lot.  Remove post (w/out sign) by pier  Remove split rail that is deteriorating around parking lot.  Clean up brush around parking lot (push brush back a bit that is encroaching)  Add better directional signage from overflow lot to main launch (have people cross Durham and use trail, not private lot owners lots).  Clean up brush along Durham for better view corridors. Lake Denoon Access Site (See Map ___ for Denoon Park) Park and Conservation Area Recommendation Rundown (S) Recommendation based on survey results * Cost share possibility ^ Volunteer aid possibility Bluhm Park Core Recommendations Add main park sign on north side and replace south main sign. (S) Possibly add a sign with an overall park map noting amenities; Add trail identification/interpretive signage. (S) Keep basketball hoop as is but consider new half court outside of parking lot in future via road program. (S) Consider connecting northern building to water now that it is close (Northern building on well). *Purchase one new set of bleachers for fields #1 and #2; Remove old. *Replace dugouts on Fields #1 and #2. Expand and install new benches. *Replace fencing around Fields #1 and #2 (w/in 5 years). *Consider adding lights to NORTH baseball/softball/football fields to increase usage and availability. *Add more parking at Bluhm south for baseball/softball. ^Consider tree planting plan and plant trees on Bluhm north; Use Urban Forestry Grant when available. Consider playground upgrade within 5 years. (S) Consider paved connection trail to Tudor Oaks along McShane. (S) Determine uniformed dog use and/or enforcement for park. (S) General Maintenance Remove dumpster & enclosure from Bluhm north. Redevelop/paint dumpster enclosure on Bluhm south. Stock park with same consistent garbage can; remove all others. Paint Pavilion once consistent park pavilion color is established. Remove pine trees from Bluhm south. Remove railroad ties sticking out of ground around south parking lot. Remove prairie planting behind Field #1, along first base side, and return to open turf. No need to mow east of Field #3 in event neighbor stops mowing this area. North side goose problem; unsanitary. Abatement required annually. (S) Add woodchips/re‐grade path in woods (avoid flooding) (S) Add back bat houses. (S) Maintain Pavilion Annually (paint, etc.) (S) Denoon Park Core Recommendations Replace main park sign. Possibly add a sign with an overall park map noting amenities; Add trail identification/interpretive signage. (S) Determine how to make basketball court more accessible to rest of park. Find way to make the lake more accessible to public than just a boat launch. Possibly bring trail system down to boat launch area. (S) Conside permanent bathrooms. (S) Consider moving playground to around back parking lot or more visible location of main recreational activities in park. (S) Explore pavilion addition towards rear parking lot. (S) *Determine disc golf possibility here (S). Ability to have course in open areas as well as meandering through conservation trail area. Define back trail that goes along back yards of residents to the east. Add directional signage as well. *Dredge boat launch for easier navigation. (S) *Establish area for Muskego Youth Football here for long term game and practice facilities. Central area of park has space to facilitate. *Work with Muskego Kickers on their needs to west. Evaluate need to re‐grade/seed north half of turf area where it is rough and gets wet easily. Determine uniformed dog use and/or enforcement for park. (S) General Maintenance Remove split rail fence along frontage of park. Remove rocks around pavement areas for less maintenance. Identify areas to mow less (north trail leading to Kelsey; keep wide enough for cross country runners though). Identify areas to mow more (Around back parking lot). Removal of some brush/tree lines in areas by back parking lot for safety/aesthetics. Mow rec trail from Kelsey going south to be more meandering rather than be straight line. Cleanup around launch (trees, brush, buckthorn). Fix cement area around boat launch that has holes. Replace grass with decorative stone in boat launch turnaround island for less maintenance. Pedestrian wooden bridge along conservation trail: redo south side boardwalk approach; pound in posts for safety; remove railroad ties for safety on south side of bridge leading to bridge on the hill. Fill in stone gaps along front drive. Horn/Veteran’s/Settlement Parks Core Recommendations *Replace main park signs throughout parks. ^Cut new trails south of storage structure of Horn Field and throughout forest area connecting back to Settlement. (S) *^Refurbish Horn Field and regrade wet areas (left field). (S) Plan alternative uses for Horn Field turf areas. (S) *^Cleanup batting cage along left field line and bullpen along right field Line (Horn). Upgrade playground equipment at Horn. (S) Add permanent basketball at Settlement parking lot and Veteran's Park. (S) New homerun fence a possible need in future (Horn). Add trail connection along left field to existing west trail (Horn). Consider Veteran's Park as future splashpad location. (S) Add more landscaping/shade to Veteran's Park. (S) Consider more rec opportunities at Veteran's Park to benefit summer rec program such as basketball, tetherball, or smaller scale disc golf. (S) Determine how turf area (Veteran's Park) could fulfill rec needs in community yet fit around fair schedule. Band Shelter at Veteran's Park could have benefits. Add new grill at Veteran's Park. (S) *Identify structural repairs needed for various Historical Society buildings yearly and cost share where possible; Barn a priority. (S) Add features to Old Town Hall building to possibly be used for future various dance/gymnastics programs (mirrors, etc.). *Find way to utilize downstairs of Old Town Hall (Has kitchen and open meeting area for rec programming in future). Determine uniform dog use/enforcement. (S) Add overall interpretive and path system signage throughout Veterans Park to Settlement to Horn (Map boards, QR Codes, etc.). (S) General Maintenance Remove fence dividing parking lot; re‐line parking lot to increase parking for area (Horn). Remove concrete approach to old Horn building. Remove tree, or limb of tree, over playground for safety OR consider moving playground to more desirable location. Remove growth along fence lines. Move bleachers to appropriate locations and fix scoreboard. Update trail surfaces throughout (wet surface areas). (S) Cleanup Veteran's raised landscape area annually. (S) Update landscaping around Old Town Hall and maintain. (S) Idle Isle Park Core Recommendations *^Improve boat launch landscaping and piers. (S) Consider lifeguards and staff led concessions. (S) Consider rentals such as canoes/kayaks/paddleboards. (S) Investigate actual parking needs and consider expansion if desired. (S) Possibly have one‐way parking lot layout to maximize space and safety. Removal of wide vehicular access to pavilion straight from main parking lot may be required. Consider alternatives to blocking traffic from parking lots to turf area other than stones. *Find permanent solution to boat wash station. (S) Keep existing playground location but update and expand. Make ADA accessible. (S) Consider trail loop around water frontage of whole park for increased walkability and recreational opportunity at park. (S) Consider opportunity for another shelter/gazebo towards SW lakefront point that could be used for rentals/revenue. Possibly have another location for open air shelter for rental as existing shelter only has space for day to day use of beach activities. ^Add more memorial benches along lake frontage trail; keep to same theme for any seating area. *Increase beach to the west of existing beachfront. (S) Lake frontage around whole park very undesirable. Shoreline restoration project should be considered along with beach extension project. Shoreline restoration would include removing all weeds/brush/old trees along shoreline throughout park and replace with grass and new riprap. (S) Consider weed machines finding new locations not along the main vistas of the frontage of the park to the southern portion of the lake. Consider area for staff to collect fees and provide information in safer format and more desirable location to entering vehicles. Find end use for city portion of concession area and ensure any Waterbug use of this area is first approved in an agreement (Current agreement up in 2017). Resurface parking lots in 5‐10 years; restripe as needed. Increased picnic/grill areas should be found. Increase Police presence. (S) Possibly create a consultant led park revitalization plan that focuses on park beautification/rejuvenation, increased usability, revenue opportunities, awareness, and accessibility. Consider fee restructuring w/ increases and better fee enforcement. (S) New Signage plan for entire park should be accomplished. Wayfinding signage to park should be looked into more to have park marketed better in future. Setup policies for use of city portion of concession area for private use if desired. Use for future rentals via recreation program OR for leasable private use. Should be request for proposal process and not first come first serve if private use is desired in future. Have new landscape plan for park recognizing preservation of vistas while increasing shade opportunities in certain areas; tree plan along a lake frontage trail. (S) Increase goose abatement. (S) General Maintenance Consider plan to have unmovable garbage can locations in strategic places in park. Increase litter cleanup/enforcement. (S) Minimize dumpster locations with enclosure to one central location; removing enclosure and container at entrance would be advisable. *^Boat launch area should be revitalized with new signage and low maintenance vegetation/hardscape. (S) Schedule daily beach cleanup of seaweed removal and/or raking. (S) Remove all coniferous trees around playground. Jensen/Lee Hubka Parks Core Recommendations Remove existing recreation building and find alternative for programming opportunity expansion in community. Re‐orient parking lot (Jensen) and get rid of unneeded hardscape if building goes away. Parking lot (Jensen) could be one‐way for safety and have exit at Silver Drive. (S) Replace main sign (Jensen). Enhance baseball field and bleacher area. Consider alternative rec uses (football, softball, soccer, rugby, etc.) for open turf area. (S) Basketball court pavement could use a re‐lining and possibly resurface in next couple years (Lee Hubka). Formally survey park in future to determine and formally mark property lines (Lee Hubka). New Plan will see this water access as Channel Access #1. Signage denoting channel access should be found (Lee Hubka). Replace one of the basketball courts with a tennis court. See if parking can be added on this surface as well (Lee Hubka). (S) Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement. (S) General Maintenance Remove undesirable trees around parking lot and outfield (Jensen). Clean up bleacher/backstop/fencing around baseball field; Re‐grade/establish baseball field. Cleanup around port‐a‐potty area (Jensen). Remove unused flag pole (Jensen). Cleanup channel shoreline/access. (S) Kurth Park Core Recommendations Replace main park signs on north and south sides. Add wayfinding signs and/or map of park amenities/trails by parking lots. (S) *Determine remedies for soccer parking including possible parking expansion, signage, scheduling, and increased Police enforcement. (S) Rehab storage/bathroom structure. (S) Remove basketball hoop for safety and create new separate basketball area in park. (S) Update all rec trails annually. Consider gravel and/or paved surfaces. (S) Update playground equipment in around 5 years time. (S) *Add homerun and foul line fencing at baseball field. *Clean up creek edge and make amenity of park and trail system. (S) *Fix base of baseball field fence where curling. Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement. (S) Add more landscaping to park. (S) General Maintenance Repaint storage building and use uniform city color. Remove dumpster and enclosure. Add ADA access hard surface path to tennis courts main gate. Trim trees along right field line at Kurth baseball field north. Lions Park Core Recommendations Add trail connection from parking lot to nearest courts (aids ADA as well). Replace main sign (sign better suited at south end of park). Determine long‐term approach to parking in light of Pickleball usage. (S) Add handicap parking closer to building and tie into pathways. Replace asphalt around building and pathways in 2‐5 years. Rough and not easily traversed especially ADA concern. (S) *Add more benches/picnic table around Pickleball and playground. (S) *Consideration for usage of structure for concessions. Fix up bathrooms and storage building. (S) *Consider spot lighting around building for increased safety. Consider hooking storage structure to city water in future; would have to run about 450’ from the north. Determine long term need of baseball backstop; Re‐fence or remove when known. *Possible future bocce ball location that would work well with Pickleball programming. ^Create landscape plan for increased shade and trees around park. Urban Forestry grant possibility. (S) *Allow concessions for Pickleball rec programming. (S) General Maintenance ^Painting outside of structure. Repair leaks in interior wall of men’s bathroom. Add smoother transition to playground for ADA aid. Remove large mulch rings around more mature trees and replace with grass for easier maintenance; protect trunks with some type of drain tile plastic if needed. Manchester Hill Park Core Recommendations Replace main park sign (low maintenance signage that is consistent throughout all parks) Better mark/promote/identify trails. Enhance trail around pond. (S) Add asphalt connection path from parking lot to playgrounds to enhance ADA. Pond enhancements: Consider fish stocking program (Fisheries grants) pier addition, and shoreline cleanup to make access more desirable up to and around pavilion. (S) Consider playground replacement in next five years or maintenance touchups. (S) Consider Ice rink enhancements (access, benches, lights, pond cleanup, etc.) (S) Consider adding bathrooms (location may be more appropriate between soccer fields and pavilion). (S) More parking closer to pavilion (could have own access off of Parkland Drive). Consider pavilion update. (S) General Maintenance Remove dumpster & enclosure Re‐identify what areas need to be mowed and which areas can grow fallow or be prairie. Work with Muskego Kickers and their maintenance crew on cost sharing on yearly soccer field maintenance (cost‐share) Clean out middle tree line dividing soccer fields and pavilion. Remove large mulch rings around more mature trees and replace with grass for easier maintenance (protect trunks with devices as needed) Add more landscaping/shade around park. (S) Moorland Park Core Recommendations Replace main park sign. Add updated overall signage plan for park denoting rules and regs. Add trail sign system. (S) Add basketball here. Consider rentable pavilion with bathrooms/electric. (S) Add hard surface access from parking lot to playground; stripe parking lot where access to playground is for safety instead of having parked cars there. Update camera system if needed. *Possibility to add rubber base at least under swing system. Would help with ADA. (S) *Re‐dress open turf areas to make facility more utilized for soccer in future. (S) *Keep prairie planting berms along roadways. (S) *Create landscape plan for park (create more shade). (S) *Consider as possible location for Pickleball/Bocce here due to senior contingent in area. (S) Update trail system with signed connections to Candlewood Creek Subdivision and other nature areas to the south (more loops, etc.). Consider stocking storm pond to south with fish and have fish rec programat this location in future (small pier). (S) Consider splash pad here. (S) Don't expand skatepark but maintain. (S) Don't add community garden here. (S) General Maintenance Annually redistribute the woodchips in the playground to keep even. (S) Maintain port‐a‐potty enclosure; hookup ADA ramp. Add enclosure doors for dumpster area. Cleanup tree line in back of playground and skate park. Muskego Centre Park Core Recommendations None General Maintenance Remove vegetation/stumps along whole shoreline annually. Park Arthur Core Recommendations Update main entrance signs with proper code numbers. Possibly add a sign with an overall park map noting amenities. Add trail identification/interpretive signage. (S) Add more trail loops; Add trail section out north east portion of central woods and on west side of park. (S) Have larger field number signs on baseball fields and in locations seen from parking lots. Have new landscape plan for park with more shading. (S) Keep dumpster here but there is no enclosure. Add playground (east of pavilion so kids can be seen by parents from baseball fields). (S) Improve storm pond for winter skating here in future w rentals. (S) Consider options/costs for utilizing west side of park for future; do not sell. (S) *Consider dog park in west area of park. (S) Add better ADA accessibility to bleachers on all four baseball diamonds. *Add scoreboards to baseball fields contingent on cost share (or in full) by clubs/MAA. (S) Add remote concession stand by fields #1‐3 contingent on cost share (or in full) by clubs/MAA. Hitting/Pitching cages between Fields #2‐3 contingent on cost share (or in full) by clubs/MAA. Upgrade all baseball facilities contingent on cost share options presented by clubs/MAA. Investigate ways to avoid adding turning lanes on the west side at College Avenue. Consider soccer and football for west side of park in future. (S) Cross‐country trails might work here; grooming thougha maintenance issue. Consider exercise trail in park. Add more picnic areas. (S) Consider speed deterrence options/more police enforcement in park. (S) General Maintenance *Re‐seed/Top‐dress all turf areas around park. (S) Add dumpster enclosure w/gate. Add bollards to southern access trail along Martin Drive. Re‐identify mowed areas. Some could be less. Re‐grade path up sledding hill; possible use of TB/millings. (S) Remove overgrown tree/bush at Martin Drive west entrance. Better maintenance of roadway edges. (S) Sand Hill Park Core Recommendations Continue building out approved site plan. General Maintenance Maintain as built out. Schmidt Park Core Recommendations Replace main park signs. Add more landcaping and shade trees. (S) Replace tennis court fencing to alleviate bottom gaps. (S) Consider pickleball lines in tennis court. (S) Replace benches around playground and add picnic tables. (S) Leave as neighborhood park solely; no club programming here in open turf area. (S) Add soccer goal in open turf area. (S) No need for increased parking here. (S) Upgrade basketball area. (S) Upgrade playground equipment in next five years. (S) Remove prairie grass areas. (S) Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement rules for park. (S) General Maintenance None. Badertscher Conservation Area Core Recommendations ^Construct a stairway on this portion of trail that has a steep slope. ^Work with Eagle Scout to construct a clear span bridge (allowing passage of light vehicles) along this stream crossing. Don't pave parking lot. (S) ^Stone pillar/cedar log fence around a portion of parking lot could be extended around entire lot and driveway. Construct enclosure for portable restroom. Develop interpretive signs at various points along hiking trail. (S) *^Construction of an observation platform/tower could be considered for the scenic vista on northern part of oak savanna area. (S) *Badertscher Preserve (or Engel) could be the site of an interpretive outdoor education center similar to Wehr (Hales Corners), Retzer (Waukesha), Schlitz Audubon (Fox Point), or Riveredge (Saukville). Such a facility would likely be constructed and maintained largely or exclusively with private funding rather than tax dollars. Consider developing self‐guided “smart phone tour” with an app that could utilize GPS and/or QR codes. (S) *Consider any abutting parcel acquisitions after evaluation of need and quality of lands as they relate to the existing owned municipal conservation lands. For Badertscher the Little Muskego Lake District could partner in neighboring acquisitions here. (S) More use by groups should be encouraged. Provision of outdoor education programming through rec program should be considered. Consider trail cams in areas to capture wildlife for promotion ofconservation area. Consider future educational events here (Maple tapping event, nature walks, educational events, etc.). Market Conservation areas more. Determine uniformed dog use/enforcement. (S) General Maintenance Utilize existing portable/removable pier section for a stream crossing in the Ridges parcel. Re‐grade parking lot periodically. Continue clean out of ash trees where they are located close to target areas (trails, parking lots, etc.). Change out Maps and information in plexiglass information booth annually. Touchup main sign. Continue making trails accessible as possible (maintenance and crossingspriority (boardwalks)). (S) Clean out old brush and trees along Field Drive to denote entrance more. Mow trails more in summer months. (S) Add more private property signs along borders. (S) Engel Conservation Area Core Recommendations Fix artesian well leak, permanently cap the well, or re‐direct the water. ^Extend boardwalk along short trail segment leading to bridge that crosses to the High School athletic fields. Extend boardwalks throughout all rough trail areas. (S) *Engel Conservation Area (or Badertscher Preserve) could be the site ofan interpretive outdoor education center similar to Wehr (Hales Corners), Retzer (Waukesha), Schlitz Audubon (Fox Point), or Riveredge (Saukville). Such a facility would likely be constructed and maintained largely or exclusively with private funding rather than tax dollars. (S) Add more permanent trail crossings where too wet in rain events including SE corner trail, west central trail, school crossing on NE side, crossing to go to Woods Road on NW side. Make access from Woods Road more evident with signage and mapping; possibly have area for a couple cars to park; define gravel drive with permanent barrier to reduce car traffic. Add more views to water vistas from trails. (S) Consider developing self‐guided “smart phone tour” with an app that could utilize GPS and/or QR codes. Encourage ecological restorations on adjacent lands remaining in ownership by others. *Consider any abutting parcel acquisitions after evaluation of need and quality of lands as they relate to the existing owned municipal conservation lands (dedication or purchase). Consider trail cams in areas to capture wildlife for promotion of conservation area. Consider future educational events here (Maple tapping event, nature walks, educational events, etc.). (S) General Maintenance Relocate split rail fence closer to pavement around parking lot. Repairportions with salvageable pieces from the Denoon Parkfence to be dismantled. Annually repair gravel access drive. (S) Replace missing hiking signs. Replace Bird City Wisconsin sign. Replace/update interpretive signs. Install signage at trail connection on Woods Road. Enlarge culvert under entrance driveway. Portable toilet enclosure rehab required. Remove telephone poles around parking lot. Continue clean out of ash trees where they are located close to target areas (trails, parking lots, etc.). Change out Maps and information in plexiglass information booth annually. Let trail around old house go fallow. Continue making trails accessible as possible (maintenance and crossings priority). (S) Mow trails more in summer months. (S) City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 51 Conservation Recommendations General Recommendations The following recommendations are considered general in nature and intended to apply broadly in relation to the overall conservation system. 1. Any conservation effort should work to meet the following guidelines:  Preservation of rural character  Preservation of native plant communities  Protection of wildlife habitat  Creation of passive and active outdoor recreation opportunities  Reduced development sprawl and overall population density  Reduced vehicular traffic  Reduced stormwater runoff and flooding  Cleaner surface waters  Groundwater recharge  Air pollution reduction 2. Based on the Parks and Conservation Survey for this Plan the following considerations should be discussed over this Plan’s planning period:  Consideration for snowshoe and cross country ski trails  Consideration for conservation workshops/conservation events  Consideration for outdoor education center  Consideration to allow dogs in conservation areas 3. A prioritization of environmental lands in the community can be found on Map ___. These lands should be considered for conservation efforts as developments or land remediation efforts are requested. Areas identified by SEWRPC as natural areas, critical species habitats, environmental corridors, and isolated natural resource areas are all included. Essentially all wetlands and older-growth forest areas of significant size are also included in the prioritization. The most important factor considered in the ranking is the ecological significance; the diversity of the plant community and quality of wildlife habitat. The size of an ecologically significant land area also plays a role in ranking as larger contiguous tracts of habitat typically support a greater diversity of plants and wildlife. The lands are divided into high, medium, and low conservation priority areas per the following:  High Conservation Priority Areas: Lands classified as a “High Conservation Priority” are generally larger tracts of land with higher quality environmental features such as older growth forests or larger, contiguous wetland areas. Land areas that provide continuity between large tracts of high quality environmental features are also included. Strong consideration should be given to acquiring lands in this designation should they become available. Those lands not acquired should be protected through other conservation planning techniques.  Medium Conservation Priority Areas: These lands are basically a continuum between high conservation priority areas and the low conservation priority areas described below. Tracts are moderately sized and/or the environmental features that they contain may be of somewhat lower quality than those designated as high priority.  Low Conservation Priority Areas: These land areas are generally smaller tracts of environmental features. This designation includes drained or degraded wetlands or lower quality woodlands. Also included are extensively fragmented, City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021 52 older-growth woodland areas that remain after previous subdivision or other development of land. In most cases, low conservation priority lands would be protected through means other than acquisition - such as isolated wetlands that are protected through state and federal land use regulations. 4. Planning Process for Conserving Prioritized Lands: This Plan recommends that the city consider conservation of all prioritized areas. While it is certainl y not feasible to acquire these lands through fee simple purchase they may be preserved through land dedications, conservation easements, preservation restrictions, conservation developments, or other means. The Parks and Conservation Committee shall review all land division and land development proposals that would affect conservation priority areas. With staff guidance, the Committee shall recommend a strategy to the Planning Commission and the Common Council to preserve or minimize the development impact of such lands. 5. Conservation lands should be managed in a manner to preserve and enhance their ecological quality. Invasive species control and establishment of native plant communities are requisite in the stewardship of conservation lands. It is recommended that the City of Muskego continue to maintain a separate planning document, Management of City of Muskego Conservation Lands, in addition to this document to outline specific management for the conservation lands that it owns. This document shall include a work plan with a prioritization and timeline for completing the recommended conservation management activities. 6. The current landfill agreement between the City of Muskego and Veolia Environmental Services Emerald Park Landfill Incorporated requires that 10% of the city’s annual direct payment is directed to a Land and Open Space Conservation Fund to purchase land and/or conservation easements that will provide for open space preservation. This Plan recommends the continued terms of this agreement with consideration of also utilizing some additional funds from the unallocated portion of the annual direct payment to further assist in conservation acquisitions. Similarly fees in lieu of land dedications should continue to be collected as a funding source for land acquisition. 7. It is recommended that the city maintain a specific budget for land management and facilities development costs. Sources for this funding could include the unallocated portion of the landfill settlement fund, the city’s general fund, state and federal grants, and private sources. To fund special projects the city also should seek partnerships and financial assistance from private conservation organizations, local lake districts and associations, local service groups, and scou ting groups in the area. 8. It is recommended that efforts be made to recruit volunteers to help the community meet its conservation objectives. Involving the community will raise a sense of stewardship for the city’s natural resources. Volunteer activities can range from assisting in land management tasks such as tree planting, seed collection, or invasive plant control, to fundraising efforts. Existing partnerships with scout groups and students should continue and new partnerships with conservation-related associations and groups should be sought. 9. The City Conservation Coordinator should maintain a capacity of consultation to the community on conservation related issues. Outdoor education classes and special events should periodically be offered through the city’s recreation programming. 10. In cases where residential development will occur within wooded areas, measures should be taken to minimize the removal of trees and adequately protect the trees that are to remain. Building envelopes should be established and preservation restrictions placed upon the lands outside of the development area. Steps should also be taken to alleviate any construction damage outside of the cleared area. City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 2017-2021 53 11. Promotion of conservation sites: Citizens should become aware of conservation sites in the city so that they can be visited and appreciated. Modest signage should be placed at each of the smaller sites. An “Adopt a Conservation Site” could be started where neighboring residents would help with land management activities and develop a sense of stewardship for the site. 12. Big Muskego Lake State Wildlife: It is recommended that the City of Muskego and the Big Muskego Lake/Bass Bay Protection and Rehabilitation District collaborate with the Wisconsin DNR in continuing to acquire/manage key parcels to protect the best remaining lands in the project area and create larger contiguous conservancy areas around Big Muskego Lake. Specific Open Space Recommendations The recommendations for the two primary recreationally active conservation sites (Engel Conservation Area and Badertscher Preserve) can be found via Maps ___& ___. City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 56 Trail Recommendations General Recommendations The following recommendations are considered general in nature and intended to apply broadly in relation to the overall trail system. 1. Recreation trails are extensions of the transportation system of the city that are intended for the use of non-motorized modes of travel. Most recreation trail facilities are located within existing or planned rights-of-way while others traverse public land holdings or are located within land easements from private owners. These facilities should serve to link the City of Muskego together with a system of safe and functional off-street recreation trail connections to accommodate such activities as walking, running, biking, cross- country skiing, in-line skating, and hiking. 2. Recreation trails are proposed to follow road rights-of-way, utility corridors, and easements to facilitate travel within the city and also connect to trails in adjoining communities as part of a regional trail network. 3. It is recommended that future subdivision and other land developments construct proposed trail sections that are adjacent to or within their proposed development area. 4. Trails should have a paved surface in urbanized areas and conform to the specifications provided by the City’s Public Works Department. 5. Inspections should take place at least bi-annually on all Muskego trails to determine if ay sections are deteriorating so plans for repairs can be made and/or budgeted for. 6. Future trail additions to the City of Muskego trail system are found on Map ___. The future trails have a priority level based upon past committee and Council discussions. The Parks and Conservation Committee shall utilize this map annually before budget time to recommend any new trail design and/or construction. Trail recommendations shall be made based on public demand, trail loop connections in the community, and as road construction projects take place. Planning/design for any new trail is recommended to commence at least one year earlier then construction (NOTE: Any trail segment addition to the community is solely up to the Council and their annually prioritization schedule). 7. Based on the Parks and Conservation survey the following trail sections should be given consideration for installation to complete loops and link residents to the overall system: a. Add a trail on Racine Avenue south of High School to south end of city b. Add trail on Woods from Durham to Tess Corners 8. The Parks and Conservation survey as part of this Plan looked to have more annual maintenance procedures with our existing trail system as well as calling for more trials in the community to be paved. 9. Update Adopt-a-Trail Program and promote. Ensure groups continually committed every year and assuming clean up duties. Specific Trail Recommendations Individual recommendations for our a few specific trail systems, including the WE En ergies tail systems, are found here: WE Energies North Trail -Continue to have Public Works install millings throughout whole trail as materials are acquired. -Remedy trail area crossing of County Hwy L by substation near Stagecoach Inn bar. Better signage as well as finding a way to wrap trail around substation better in future instead of having users go down highway for a couple hundred feet. -Have new signage plan along trail system: City of Muskego Parks and Conservation Plan 58 -Change and/or add traffic control signs. -Update/add brown wooden signs at crossings. -Update Adopt a Trail signs that are in rough shape. -Add gateway signage at west end denoting trail system. -Denote start/end of equestrian trail portion. -Update map signs along with proper directions. -Be consistent with signage and associated mountings. WE Energies Hwy 36 Trail -Have Public Works install millings throughout whole trail as materials are acquired to define the trail and remove areas of overgrowth. -Work on extending trail east of North Cape towards Franklin. -Cut trail thru boulevard of Champions Drive. -Remove vision corner shrub along Champions Drive trail portion. -Add benches along trail system. -Overall signage should be evaluated: -Change and/or add traffic control signs. -Trailhead (gateway) and map signs should be added. -Update Adopt a Trail signs that are in rough shape. -Opportunities to note environmental areas along trail could be found. -Add trailhead signage about Muskego trails at Wind Lake Canal Public Access. Access is a great community asset and should be promoted as good fishing spot and/or fishing access spot. Environmental education signage location could be found. Page 1 of 2 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Parks and Conservation Committee To: Parks and Conservation Committee From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: Director of Public Works Report Date: June 2, 2016 I have included general information and project specific updates related to Parks maintenance for your use. Should any questions arise please don’t hesitate to contact me directly. Maintenance Items  Fox Services LLC has agreed to keep their prices for lawn mowing and have executed an agreement for the 2016 season. They have already begun mowing the parks. Facilities  Horn Park Building- The building is completed and the storage areas has been cleaned and given to Recreation so that they have a dedicated area to store items that their department needs.  Buildings were pressure washed at Vets, Kurth, and Horn.  We replaced the siding on the storage shed at Mill Valley. 2016 Park Improvements  DPW has finalized all work at Park Arthur including additional work added to the scope such as installing bleacher pads, installing a new inlet for drainage, and rolling the outfields to reduce bumps. There are areas of the fence that need to be lowered and we are trying to connect with Patriot Fence to get that accomplished.  Bluhm Park- The Developer of Belle Chasse Subdivision has completed the boardwalk improvement, Rugby field and walkway from Durham Drive to the Park. The field will likely be ready for play no earlier than the fall of 2016 or spring of 2017. The additional topsoil and seed appear to have worked and the field is currently growing.  WE Energies Trail Improvement- We have placed a 3 inch layer of new material over the section from Lannon Drive to the west the week of April 18th. The material worked well initially but the rain has washed the fine materials away. We will need to discuss how to proceed before doing any more sections of trail. We plan to do a test section where we place fine material on top of what we did already and then discuss again.  Sand Hill Park- Blaze Landscape has started work this week. They anticipate a completion sometime in June or July. The project is moving ahead nicely with no unexpected items to date. Page 2 of 2  The Woods Road path from Racine to Windover was bid and the low bid was from Johnson Paving and was for $273,211.00 was accepted. A preconstruction meeting will be held on June 9th with construction starting shortly after. Memo To: Parks and Conservation Committee From: Tom Zagar CC: Jeff Muenkel Date: June 2, 2016 Re: Conservation Coordinator Report Here is an update of projects related to Lakes, Forestry, and Conservation:  US Fish & Wildlife Service has drafted an agreement with the City of Muskego a land restoration project on the newly acquired Durham Drive conservation site - this property was recently dedicated to the City by Homes by Towne.. The project includes a small wetland restoration and planting of agricultural fields to prairie vegetation. Attorney Warchol has reviewed the agreement form. It is requested that the Parks and Conservation Committee recommend approval of the agreement to Finance Committee and Common Council.  Staff is hiring the canine services of “Geese Police” to discourage geese from using Idle Isle Park. The City is receiving a DNR grant to assist goose control costs.  As you may be aware from recent media coverage a Civil War veterans group has taken issue with the management of Luther Parker Cemetery. An alderman has requested that the matter be discussed at Committee of the Whole. Luther Parker Cemetery has been managed to maintain the extremely rare mesic prairie plant community that grows there – the same vegetation that existed when the pioneers were laid to rest. The Southeastern Regional Planning Commission will be providing the City a statement regarding the management of this site as a natural area. Community Development Department CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Parks & Conservation Committee June 8, 2016 To: Parks & Conservation Committee From: Tammy Dunn, Recreation Manager Subject: Recreation Program Miscellaneous Updates Date: June 2, 2016 Please find the following items in relation to various recreation programs/activities in the city. Such items don’t require committee action but can certainly be discussed during the Miscellaneous Business portion of the meeting. 1. Pickleball Updates: a. A ribbon cutting event is being planned for the new Pickleball Courts at Lions Park for early July. As details are finalized an invitation will be extended to all committee members. b. Due to the dedicated group of pickleball volunteers, a schedule is bein g created to help with some park beautification of Lions Park in the areas near the new courts. c. Learn to Play lessons and Open Play have seen good solid enrollment for the spring and summer classes. 2. Summer registration has been going well for all programs. a. We have a very full all-day playground program with a total of 220 kids registered between the 3 sites. We have worked with the Muskego/Norway School District to be able to use the gym of Muskego Elementary for this summer on the days of extreme rain for our children in the outdoor playground program at Veterans Memorial Park. b. A new class offering for this summer, being instructed by Tom Zagar and Adam Young, is the Big Muskego Lake Scenic Kayak Tours. We have 3 dates offered with a total of 35 people enrolled. This class offering gives us the chance to showcase not only the beauty of the lake itself, but also of the knowledge of our city staff of these natural resources.