Loading...
Public Works Committee Packet - 11/17/2014 CITY OF MUSKEGO PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA November 17, 2014 6:00 PM Aldermen’s Room – Upper Level of City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE APPROVAL OF MINUTES HELD OF MEETING HELD OCTOBER 22, 2014 STATUS OF PROJECTS Discussion update. No formal action may be taken on any of the following: 1. Woods Road Bridge 2. 2014 Road Improvement Program 3. Jensen Park Lift Station Upgrade UNFINISHED BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: 1. Discuss traffic issues in Rosewood Estates Subdivision NEW BUSINESS Discussion update and possible action may be taken on any or all of the following: 1. Discuss Belle Chasse Addition #2 temporary winter pavement request. 2. Discuss the City of New Berlin's request to add additional sanitary sewer connections to the City of Muskego's sanitary sewer system. NEW BUSINESS PLACED ON FILE (The following items have been placed on file for staff review. Upon completion of review, staff will submit a supplement detailing options and possible course of action to committee members.) COMMUNICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS SERVICE, CONTACT MUSKEGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, (262) 679-4136. CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works Committee To: Public Works Committee From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: Discuss traffic issues in Rosewood Estates Subdivision Date: November 13, 2014 Previously Reported. The Homeowner’s Associations for Rosewood Estates Subdivision and Candlewood Village Condominiums have approached the City with concerns regarding excessive traffic traveling through their subdivisions. They believe that traffic is traveling on Rosewood Drive and Westcot Drive as a cut through between Moorland Road and Durham Place. Their assertion is that traffic that would otherwise have utilized Durham Place onto Janesville Road is cutting through their subdivision (as well as using Cornell Drive to Tess Corners Drive). The Police Department completed traffic counts in this area but the traffic counter appears to have malfunctioned as the counts we not consistent so we will be completing further monitoring and can report back at a future meeting. Residents are requesting that the City consider alternatives as I have described and discussed below and have shown on the attached map: 1. Reopen Durham Place onto Janesville Road. This alternative would be very costly because the County would require the roadway to be realigned and signals to be installed. The rough estimate of cost would be $500,000. 2. Connect Cornell Circle to Princeton Drive (Penn Lane). An existing right of way that connects Cornell Circle to Princeton Drive could be improved with a roadway to allow traffic to utilize the existing traffic signals at Princeton and Janesville. This would require construction of approximately 400 linear feet of roadway. This cost for this project would be approximately $50,000. 3. Install Traffic Calming along Rosewood Drive. Cost would vary for this alternative but it would reduce any potential speeding and may deter cut through traffic. The cost to install a traffic circle at Rosewood and Westcot would be approximately $10,000-18,000. We have not utilized this alternative in the past but this intersection may be a good candidate for this type of project. 4. Close the roadway at the existing culdesac on Westcot. This option would isolate the neighborhood by limiting emergency response as well as require added operating expenses for snow removal, refuse collection, mail delivery. The added capital expense for this option would be approximately $20,000 and is not favored by staff. New Information. Per the Committee’s request we are discussing this item now that we have accurate traffic count data. The attached data was collected at the transition from Westcot Drive to Rosewood Drive. Additional data should be available by the start of the meeting for a location along Rosewood Drive. I have analyzed this neighborhood as Page 1 of 2 it related to trip generation. The Institute of Traffic Engineering provides data that is used across the Country to predict the number of trips to and from a specific type of land use. For example a single family home is expected to produce 9.57 trips/day on average. A trip is considered a one way trip to our from the destination. An example for a single family home might be each spouse goes to work and arrives home from work and then leaves to go to dinner in one car and perhaps runs and errand later in one car, which would total 8 trips. You can see how an average home quickly makes many trips per day. I have used a simplified method to obtain the total number of trips from the 24 duplex units (6.65 trips/day) and 28 single family homes (9.57 trips/day) in Rosewood Estates to be 428 trips per day on average. This doesn’t account for any traffic in the Candlewood Village area traveling to Durham Place. We can assume that the majority of traffic in the subdivisions travel out to Moorland, however some traffic will utilize Durham Place as well. Assuming that 80% of traffic travels to Moorland Road you would expect to see a one way count no greater than 171 trips per day if only neighborhood traffic utilizes the roadway. Also, we should hope to see speeds in the 85th percentile be no more than 30mph based on standard practices. The count we already have shows an 85th percentile speed of 17 mph, however, should the 85th percentile speed exceed 30mph in the count we are awaiting the Committee may want to consider traffic calming device installation. Recommendation for Action by Committee: Discuss results of the additional traffic counts that should be available at the meeting and make a recommendation. Page 2 of 2 26.5' WOODS R D JANES V I L L E R D TESS C O R N E R S D R DU R H A M P L S H E R W O O D C I R M O O R L A N D R D BRISTLECONE LN FE N N I M O R E L N RO S E W O O D D R PRINC E T O N D R CORNELL DR HA L E P A R K D R CHERRYWOOD DR BELMONT DR CATALINA DR Q U I E T W O O D D R G A U L K E C T FLEETWOOD RD CORNELL CIR SANDALWOOD DR M A R T I N D R SETTLER W A Y K I P L I N G D R G A U L K E D R WESTCOT DR BR E N T W O O D D R DO V E R L N D U R H A M C T HIDDEN CREEK CT CAN D L E W O O D L N CL A R E N D O N P L KOSO DR HARDWICKE PL GOLDEN COU N T R Y D R DARTMOUTH CIR DU N S T A N C T CHERRYWOOD CT B R I S T L E C O N E C T HALE P A R K C T SANDALW O O D D R Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works Committee To: Public Works Committee From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: Belle Chasse Addition #2 temporary winter pavement request Date: November 13, 2014 The Developer of Belle Chasse Addition #2 is requesting that the City consider allowing temporary asphalt pavement if they cannot complete their final pavement surface prior to the winter. We do not allow paving unless the grou nd is not frozen and air temperatures allow. At this point it may be impossible to meet the City’s standard requirements for full binder pavement before the winter sets in. The Developer is asking that we consider a temporary pavement that would be in place of the top 1.5” of stone base. If the asphalt is ok in the spring it would be paved over and if it does not fair well it would be removed by p ulverization and removal of the extra stone. I think this method is reasonable. If the Committee is receptive we would amend the Development Agreement to reflect this and would have a letter of credit in place that would allow for completion if needed. Recommendation for Action by Committee: Allow temporary asphalt pavement in Belle Chasse Addition #2. CITY OF MUSKEGO Staff Report to Public Works Committee To: Public Works Committee From: David Simpson, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: City of New Berlin’s request to add additional sanitary sewer connections to the City of Muskego’s sanitary sewer system. Date: November 13, 2014 The City of New Berlin has again made a request (see attached) to allow additional connections into the City of Muskego sanitary sewer system. New Berlin has historically made these requests rarely, however, in the past few years these requests have begun to increase. Based on the fact that our Sanitary Sewerage Facilities Plan shows potential facility upgrades downstream of this area I believe it is important to analyze all potential negative possibilities should we continue to allow additional connections in New Berlin. By having a consultant study this area in more detail we would be able to make a more informed decision as to how many connections we might be able to allow in New Berlin vs. in Muskego. I have drafted the attached letter as a potential response to New Berlin’s request, which asks New Berlin to pay for the study and denies their request pending more detailed information from a study. Recommendation for Action by Committee: Deny requested connections at this time and approve sending New Berlin the attached letter asking for more information and for an agreement to pay for the cost of a detailed study. Page 1 of 1 DRAFT November 18, 2014 Mayor David Ament City of New Berlin 3805 S. Casper Drive New Berlin, WI 53151 RE: Requested Connections to the City of Muskego Sanitary System Mayor Ament, The City of Muskego Public Works Committee has reviewed the City of New Berlin’s request to add five additional connections to the City of Muskego sanitary system. We do understand that vacant land exists in the Linnie Lac area, however, per the 1974 agreement “It is expressly understood by New Berlin that Muskego is not willing at the present time to extend sanitary sewer service to presently existing vacant platted lots of record located within the Linnie Lac area, nor is it willing to extend sanitary sewer service to vacant lands which are undeveloped….”, therefore, it is understood that Muskego did not intend to provide service to the vacant lands you mentioned in your letter under the 1974 agreement. The Committee discussed your request and is requesting that additional information be provided before a decision is made regarding any additional connections. The City of Muskego commissioned a study titled “Sanitary Sewerage Facilities Plan”, completed in 2007, that details the City of Muskego’s existing sanitary conveyance system and potential limitations to that system as population growth and land development occurs. Because future land use in Muskego may be affected by decisions made now relating to additional connections in New Berlin we feel it is important to gain a clear understanding of what additional sanitary capacity New Berlin would like to obtain from the City of Muskego in the future. A more detailed analysis is needed of our system’s limitations in the downstream areas that New Berlin connections will affect prior to allowing further connections. If the City of New Berlin would like Muskego to complete a more detailed analysis of our system limitations as they relate to New Berlin’s future land use Muskego would be willing to do so if New Berlin agreed to pay for the study. If you would like us to initiate scoping and obtaining a price for completing this study at New Berlin’s expense please inform me of such. Until such time that the City of Muskego has enough data to make an informed decision we will not be allowing any additional connections to our sanitary conveyance system from the City of New Berlin. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (262) 679-5686. Thank you, City of Muskego David Simpson, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer ENGINEERING DIVISION W182 S8200 Racine Avenue, PO Box 749 Muskego, Wisconsin 53150-0749 (262) 679-4145 FAX (262) 679-5614