Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Plan Commission Packet - 9/3/2013
CITY OF MUSKEGO PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA September 3, 2013 6:00 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 6, 2013 MEETING PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearing for a Conditional Use in accordance with Section 14 of the City of Muskego Zoning Ordinance for Dan Hewitt for the allowance of a dwelling unit accessory to a commercial use located along Janesville Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 9 (Tax Key 2195.999 / Janesville Road). CONSENT BUSINESS Recommended for approval en gross. RESOLUTION #P.C. 040-2013 - Approval of an Accessory Building for the Cotteleer property located in the NW 1/4 of Section 14 (Tax Key 2214.997.008 / W152 S8215 Mystic Drive). RESOLUTION #P.C. 041-2013 - Recommendation of Approval for Two (2) Right of Way Vacations for Willow Glen Drive and an Unnamed Right-of-Way off of Clearbrook Drive in the SE 1/4 of Section 16. RESOLUTION #P.C. 042-2013 - Approval of a Second Accessory Structure for the Wells property located in the SE 1/4 of Section 24 (Tax Key 2256.991 / W126 S9331 North Cape Rd). NEW BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION #P.C. 037-2013 - Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for Your Auto Wash located in the NW 1/4 of Section 10 (Tax Key 2198.978 / S73 W16555 Janesville Road). RESOLUTION #P.C. 038-2013 - Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan for Summit Credit Union located in the SW 1/4 of Section 2 (Tax Key 2167.995.010 / Moorland Road). RESOLUTION #P.C. 039-2013 - Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for Royal Recognition located in the SE 1/4 of Section 17 (Tax Key 2228.999.008 / S83 W19105 Saturn Drive). RESOLUTION #P.C. 043-2013 - Approval of a Conditional Use Grant and Building, Site and Operation Plan for the Dan Hewitt property located in the SW 1/4 of Section 9 (Tax Key 2195.999 / Janesville Road). MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT MEMBERS OF AND POSSIBLY A QUORUM OF MEMBERS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION; NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL BODY AT THE ABOVE-STATED MEETING OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO ABOVE IN THIS NOTICE. ALSO, UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS THROUGH APPROPRIATE AIDS AND SERVICES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST THIS SERVICE, CONTACT MUSKEGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, (262) 679-4136. Unapproved CITY OF MUSKEGO PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES August 6, 2013 6:00 PM Muskego City Hall, W182 S8200 Racine Avenue CALL TO ORDER Mayor Chiaverotti called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Those present recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Kathy Chiaverotti, Ald. Borgman, Commissioners Hulbert, Buckmaster, and Jacques and Director Muenkel and Recording Secretary McMullen.Absent: Commissioners Bartlett and Stinebaugh STATEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICE The meeting was property noticed in accordance with the open meeting laws. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 4, 2013 MEETING Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 4, 2013 meeting, Commissioner Buckmaster seconded. Motion Passed 5 in favor. PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearing for a Conditional Use in accordance with Section 14 of the City of Muskego Zoning Ordinance for Richard Burback (R&N Properties) for the use of residential living quarters to be located within the same building as a business located at W185 S8095 Racine Ave, in the SE ¼ of Section 16 (Tax Key 2221.016.001/ W185 S8095 Racine Ave). Mayor Chiaverotti asked for any questions or comments from the audience. With no other comments or questions Mayor Chiaverotti closed the public hearing at 6:03 PM. CONSENT BUSINESS The following agenda items have been received by the Community Development Department and are recommended for approval en gross. Commissioner Buckmaster made a motion to approve CONSENT BUSINESS engross, Commissioner Jacques seconded. Motion Passed 5 in favor. RESOLUTION #P.C. 033-2013 –Approval of a One Lot Certified Survey Map (to combine two lots into one) for the Moorland Janesville LLC property located in the SW 1/4 of Section 2 (Tax Key Nos. 2167.994 and 2167.993/ S69 W15496 and S69 W15464 Janesville Road). RESOLUTION #P.C. 034-2013 – Approval of a mother-in-law unit for the Quartana property located in the NW 1/4 of Section 11 (Tax Key No. 2202.057 / S74 W15169 Cherrywood Drive). NEW BUSINESS FOR CONSIDERATION The following agenda items have been received by the Community Development Department and are recommended for individual consideration. RESOLUTION #P.C. 032-2013 – Approval of a Conditional Use Grant for residential quarters located in the same building as the business for R&N Properties located in the NW ¼ of Section 16 (Tax Key No. 2221.016.001/ W185 S8095 Racine Ave). Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve RESOLUTION#P.C. 032-2013 Commissioner Hulbert seconded. Commissioner Buckmaster made a motion to amend Resolution PC 032-2013 to read: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the upper level residential unit can only be occupied by someone that owns or is employed by the business in the lower portion of the building. Commissioner Hulbert seconded. Motion Passed 5 in favor. Motion Passed 5 in favor. RESOLUTION #P.C. 035-2013 – Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for the Rajnovic mulit family property located in the SW 1/4 of Section 16 (Tax Key No. 2223.993 / W183 S8479 Racine Ave.) Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #P.C. 035-2013 Approval of a Building, Site and Operation Plan Amendment for the Rajnovic mulit family property located in the SW 1/4 of Section 16 (Tax Key No. 2223.993 / W183 S8479 Racine Ave.). Commissioner Hulbert seconded. Motion Passed 5 in favor. RESOLUTION #P.C. 036-2013 – Approval of a BSO Amendment for NABCO Entrances Inc. located in the NW ¼ of Section 16 (Tax Key No. 2222.982 / S82 W 18717 Gemini Dr). Commissioner Jacques made a motion to approve RESOLUTION#P.C. 036-2013 Approval of a BSO Amendment for NABCO Entrances Inc. located in the NW ¼ of Section 16 (Tax Key No. 2222.982 / S82 W18717 Gemini Dr). Commissioner Buckmaster seconded. Commissioner Hulbert made a motion to amend Resolution #PC 036-2013 to read: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That based upon the existing materials of the main building on this site, the front elevation of the new building must contain a 4 foot lower band of masonry wainscotingat least 50% masonry , to match the masonry materials and colors on the main building. Commissioner Buckmaster seconded. Motion Passed 5 in favor. Motion Passed 5 in favor. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hulbert made a motion to adjourn at 6:39 PM. Commissioner Jacques seconded. Motion Passed 7 in favor. Respectfully submitted, Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary I P L E A S E T A K E N O T I C E t h a t t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n o f t h e C i t y o f M u s k e g o w i l l h o l d a P u b l i c H e a r i n g a t 6 : 0 0 P M o n T u e s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 3 i n t h e M u s k e g o R o o m o f C i t y H a l l , W 1 8 2 S 8 2 0 0 R a c i n e A v e n u e , t o c o n s i d e r t h e f o l l o w i n g : U p o n t h e p e t i t i o n o f D a n H e w i t t s h a l l t h e f o l l o w i n g a r e a k n o w n a s : T a x K e y N u m b e r 2 1 9 5 . 9 9 9 b e g r a n t e d a C o n d i t i o n a l U s e P e r m i t i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e M u s k e g o Z o n i n g O r d i n a n c e f o r t h e a l l o w a n c e o f a d w e l l i n g u n i t a c c e s s o r y t o a c o m m e r c i a l u s e . T h e p e t i t i o n e r s a p p l i c a t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e f o r p u b l i c i n s p e c t i o n a t t h e C i t y o f M u s k e g o C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t . A l l i n t e r e s t e d p a r t i e s w i l l b e g i v e n a n o p p o r t u n i t y t o b e h e a r d . P l a n C o m m i s s i o n C i t y o f M u s k e g o P u b l i s h i n t h e M u s k e g o N O W N e w s p a p e r o n A u g u s t 2 2 , 2 0 1 3 . D a t e d t h i s 1 4 t h d a y o f A u g u s t 2 0 1 3 0 1 4 0 2 8 0 7 0 F e e t N O T I C E I T I S P O S S I B L E T H A T M E M B E R S O F A N D P O S S I B L Y A Q U O R U M O F M E M B E R S O F O T H E R G O V E R N M E N T A L B O D I E S O F T H E M U N I C I P A L I T Y M A Y B E I N A T T E N D A N C E A T T H E A B O V E - S T A T E D M E E T I N G A N D G A T H E R I N F O R M A T I O N ; N O A C T I O N W I L L B E T A K E N B Y A N Y G O V E R N M E N T A L B O D Y A T T H E A B O V E - S T A T E D M E E T I N G O T H E R T H A N T H E G O V E R N M E N T A L B O D Y S P E C I F I C A L L Y R E F E R R E D T O A B O V E I N T H I S N O T I C E . N O T I C E " P l e a s e n o t e t h a t , u p o n r e a s o n a b l e n o t i c e , e f f o r t s w i l l b e m a d e t o a c c o m m o d a t e t h e n e e d s o f d i s a b l e d i n d i v i d u a l s t h r o u g h a p p r o p r i a t e a i d s a n d s e r v i c e s . F o r a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n o r t o r e q u e s t t h i s s e r v i c e s c o n t a c t t h e C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t a t C i t y H a l l , W 1 8 2 S 8 2 0 0 R a c i n e A v e n u e , ( 2 6 2 ) 6 7 9 - 4 1 3 6 . " C I T Y O F M U S K E G O N O T I C E O F P U B L I C H E A R I N G A f f e c t e d A r e a S t r u c t u r e s P r o p e r t i e s W i t h i n 3 0 0 F e e t P r o p e r t y B o u n d a r i e s D a t e : 8 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 3 City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 040-2013 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Metal Accessory Structure Tax Key No. 2214.997.008 / W152 S8215 Mystic Drive NW ¼ of Section 14 PETITIONER: Bill Canfield, Canfield Buildings INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 040-2013 The petitioner is proposing to construct a 1,772 square foot metal accessory structure on site. Plans are attached for your review. Plan Commission may waive the architectural requirements for accessory structures when any of the following are met: 1. The structure is screened from view, 2. The principal structure is composed of materials, colors, or styles that are inappropriate in their applications to an accessory structure, 3. The Plan Commission finds other circumstances to be present which would result in no undue harm to the property or its surroundings, 4. When the area is not found to be predominately residential. Plan Commission may approve the materials as submitted, or require modifications prior to release of building permits. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 040-2013 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the area for Low Density Residential uses. The proposal for a residential outbuilding is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned RS-2, Suburban Residence District. Accessory structures totaling 3,978 square feet are permitted on the subject property. The proposal is to add a new 1,772 square foot accessory structure. The proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code except the architectural requirements of accessory structures. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 040-2013 The architectural requirements state that the accessory structure should have similar materials and colors as the principal residence. Planning Commission approval is being sought due to this concern. The petitioner is proposing a vertical metal sided, dimensional shingled-roofed structure with 18-inch overhangs. The walls will be red in color, the trim will be a tan in color, and the roof will be gray in color, which are all similar to the colors of the home. The building is proposed to be located over 600’ from the nearest public street. The proposed building is shown having decorative elements such as windows with decorative mullions/lattices (on two sides of the building), pedestrian door, a copula, an attached covered porch area, and overhangs similar to the house. The building is 30’ x 50’ (1,500 SF) in size with a 272 SF attached covered porch. The petitioner has stated that the proposed building will be used for personal storage. The Resolution also states the following items: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building cannot be used for the operations of a business. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the floor of the accessory structure must be asphalt, sealed concrete block, or concrete slab per the Zoning Code and it must meet all applicable building codes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the colors of the new accessory structure must be similar to the colors of the house. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That more exact details relating to the height, the floorplan, and the location on the lot must be provided at the time permitting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 040-2013 Approval of Resolution #PC 040-2013, finding that there will be no undue harm to the surrounding properties, the building is located over 600’ from the nearest public street, and the location of the building is being located in a fairly remote area. MUSKEGOthe City of Area of Interest 0 150 300 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 040-2013 Cotteleer W152 S8215 Mystic Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/23/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C. 040-2013 APPROVAL OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR THE COTTELEER PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 14 (TAX KEY NO. 2214.997.008 / W152 S8215 MYSTIC DRIVE) WHEREAS, A site plan and building drawings were submitted by Canfield Buildings for the Cotteleer property to construct a 1,772 square foot metal accessory structure on their property located at W152 S8215 Mystic Drive (Tax Key No. 2214.997.008), and WHEREAS, The property is zoned RS-2, Suburban Residence District and said structure is a permitted accessory use and subject to Plan Commission review due to the proposed architectural materials shown, and WHEREAS, The building is 30’ x 50’ (1,500 SF) in area and also contains a 272 SF attached covered porch, and WHEREAS, There is an existing house on the property, and WHEREAS, The owner stated that the accessory structure will be used for personal storage, and WHEREAS, The total allowed square footage for accessory structures on this property is limited to 3,978 square feet, and said proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, The structure is proposed to be clad with vertical metal siding and a dimensional shingled roof and said proposal does not meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures as the siding does not match the materials used on the primary residence, and WHEREAS, The walls will be red in color, the trim will be a tan in color, and the roof will be gray in color, which are all similar to the colors of the home, and WHEREAS, The accessory structure will have 18-inch overhangs, and WHEREAS, The building is shown having decorative elements such as windows with decorative mullions/lattices (on two sides of the building), pedestrian door, a copula, an attached covered porch area, and overhangs similar to the house, and WHEREAS, The structure is located over 600’ from the nearest public street and the location of the building is being located in a fairly remote area. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves a 1,772 square foot metal accessory structure submitted by Canfield Buildings for Dave & Amy Cotteleer for their property located at W152 S8215 Mystic Drive (Tax Key No. 2214.997.008). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building cannot be used for the operations of a business. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the floor of the accessory structure must be asphalt, sealed concrete block, or concrete slab per the Zoning Code and it must meet all applicable building codes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the colors of the new accessory structure must be similar to the colors of the house. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That more exact details relating to the height, the floorplan, and the location on the lot must be provided at the time permitting. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of the accessory structure due to no undue harm to the surrounding properties, the building is located over 600’ from the nearest public street, and the location of the building is being located in a fairly remote area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the terms of this resolution and the approved site plans shall result in the issuance of fines of $100 per day per violation, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 041-2013 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Two (2) Right-of-Way Vacations for Willow Glen Drive and an Unnamed Right-of-Way off of Clearbrook Drive SW ¼ & SE ¼ of Section 16 PETITIONER: David Hoffmann, Willow Glen Apartments INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 041-2013 The petition is to vacate two right-of-way areas as part of the development of the Willow Glen Apartment Complex. One right-of-way is Willow Glen Drive, which is located east of Racine Ave. The other is an unnamed right-of-way, which is located west of Clearbrook Drive. Plan Commission approval is required for any right-of-way vacation. The Public Works Committee has already reviewed PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 041-2013 Street System Plan: The plans do not require these two dedicated right-of-ways any longer, due to the development of the Willow Glen complex. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Water Capacity Assessment District: A municipal water main extension is going to be installed within the right-of-way area off of Clearbrook Drive. Easements will be established for placement of this water main extension. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. DISCUSSION PC 041-2013 Relating to the right-of-way vacations, all of the proper documents have been submitted to proceed with the right-of-way request. The request has already proceeded through the Public Works Committee for their review. They did not have any concerns or issues. The Planning and Engineering Divisions do not see any problems with the requested vacations. As such, staff is recommending approval of the right-of- way vacations. The only condition of approval is that a water main easement needs to be established to cover the water main within the unnamed right-of-way off of Clearbrook Drive. This water main is being installed to serve the new Willow Glen development. The petitioner must prepare the required easement documents, have them signed by the adjacent land owners and then provide those to the City. We need to have these signed easement documents before the Common Council can approve the vacations. This is the only way to ensure that the proper easements are established. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 041-2013 Approval of Resolution PC 041-2013, subject to all technical corrections and revisions listed above and in the Resolution. MUSKEGOthe City of Area of Interest 0 280 560 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 041-2013 Willow Glen Drive Clearbrook Drive Extension JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/28/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C.041-2013 RECOMMENDATION TO COMMON COUNCIL TO VACATE TWO (2) RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR WILLOW GLEN DRIVE AND AN UNNAMED RIGHT OF WAY OFF OF CLEARBROOK DRIVE FOR WILLOW GLEN APARTMENTS LOCATED IN THE SW ¼ & SE ¼ OF SECTION 16 WHEREAS, On June 30, 2013 a request was submitted by David Hoffmann of Willow Glen Apartments for two (2) right-of-way vacations located in the SW ¼ & SE ¼ of Section 16, and WHEREAS, The right-of-ways to be vacated are Willow Glen Drive and an unnamed (unimproved) right-of-way off of Clearbrook Drive, and WHEREAS, These right-of-way vacations were requirements of the overall development plan approval for the Willow Glen development project, and WHEREAS, A water main easement needs to be establishment to cover the water main within the unnamed right-of-way off of Clearbrook Drive, and WHEREAS, The Public Works Committee reviewed this at their August 2013 meeting with no concerns, and WHEREAS, The Planning and Engineering Departments do not see any problems with the requested vacation. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission recommends to the Common Council the vacation of the dedicated right-of-way for Willow Glen Drive and the unnamed dedicated right-of-way west of Clearbrook Drive. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The petitioner must prepare the required water main easement documents, have them signed by the adjacent land owners, and then provide those to the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the signed easement documents must be submitted to the City before the Common Council can approve the right-of-way vacations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 042-2011 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Additional Accessory Structure Tax Key No. 2256.991 / W126 S9331 North Cape Road SE ¼ of Section 24 PETITIONER: Diamond Building Improvements for James Wells INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Adam Trzebiatowski, AICP BACKGROUND PC 042-2013 The petitioner proposes to construct an accessory structure 616 square feet in area. Since this accessory structure is in addition to one existing accessory structure, Plan Commission approval is required. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 042-2013 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the area for medium density residential land use. The proposal for this residential outbuilding is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned RS-3 Suburban Residence District. Accessory structures totaling around 1,202 square feet are permitted on the subject property. The current proposal measures 616 square feet in area. There is one other accessory structure that exists on the lot, which totals 522 square feet in size. The grand total of all accessory structure square footage with the proposed accessory structure equals 1,138 square feet. The proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 042-2013 Design Guide requirements state that Planning Commission approval is needed for more than one accessory structure on a lot when it is being used for residential purposes. Planning Commission approvals are being sought due to this concern since one other accessory structure exists on the lot. The petitioner proposes a residentially sided structure with a shingled roof. The colors and materials of the accessory structure will need to match the colors of the existing house. The location of this building meets the required setback and offsets. The height of the structure is about 11 feet, as measured according to code, which meets code requirements. Staff has no concern with the placement or architecture of the added accessory structure, as long as the colors match the existing house. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 042-2013 Approval of Resolution #PC 042-2013 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0130260 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 042-2013 Wells W126 S9331 North Cape Rd JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/23/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C. 042-2013 APPROVAL OF AN ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR THE WELLS PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24 (TAX KEY NO. 2256.991 / W126 S9331 NORTH CAPE ROAD) WHEREAS, On August 20, 2013 a site plan and building drawings were submitted to construct a 616 square foot accessory structure on the property located at W126 S9331 North Cape Road, and WHEREAS, The property is zoned RS-3 Suburban Residence District, and whereas said structure is a permitted accessory use and subject to Plan Commission review due to more than one accessory structure on the lot as per design guidelines for residential uses, and WHEREAS, One accessory structure totaling 522 square feet and a home residence currently reside on the property, and WHEREAS, The total square footage for accessory structures on this property is limited to about 1,202 square feet, and said proposal meets the bulk requirements of the Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, The combined total of the two (2) accessory structures will be 1,138 square feet, which is within the allowed limit, and WHEREAS, The structure is proposed to be constructed with residential siding and a shingled roof and said proposal does meet the Plan Commission’s standards for administrative approval of residential accessory structures as the siding and roof materials are of a residential quality and will be similar colors to the existing house on the property, and WHEREAS, The proposed height is approximately 11 feet, as measured by code. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves a 616 square foot accessory structure for James Wells for the property located at W126 S9331 North Cape Road. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the colors of the proposed building must match the colors of the existing home. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the floor of the entire building must be concrete. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the building cannot be used for the operations of any business activities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the terms of this resolution and the approved site plans shall result in the issuance of fines of $100 per day per violation, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 037-2013 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Building, Site, and Operation Plan Amendment Tax Key No. 2198.978 / S73 W16555 Janesville Road NW ¼ of Section 10 PETITIONER: Greg Foat – Your Auto Wash INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Jeff Muenkel, AICP BACKGROUND PC 037-2013 The property is located on Janesville and has operated as Your Auto Wash car wash for many years. The owner would like to add a new sign and fence along the east property line to alleviate traffic flow issues to the neighboring businesses. The addition of the fence and landscaping would shut off cross access that has existed here in the past to the business property to the east. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 037-2013 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the parcel for commercial use. The proposal is consistent with the plan. Zoning: The property is zoned B-4 – Highway Business District. The proposal is consistent with the plan. DISCUSSION PC 037-2013 As mentioned the proposals to add a fence and landscaping along the parcel’s east property line. The new space would create an area for a sign that was removed as part of the Janesville Road reconstruction project while also alleviating traffic concerns for the owner. However, the proposal would remove the cross access between the petitioner’s parcel and the commercial parcels to the east. As shown on the submitted map and drawings a new landscaped area would replace existing asphalt along the east property line extending about 10 feet in width. The new grass area would have new landscape plantings extending from the existing building all the way to the property line. Also, a 3 ½ -foot high split rail fence will adorn the property as well to give the site more character and appeal. Lastly, the sign that once was along the right-of-way, and removed as part of the Janesville Road reconstruction, will be placed. The sign placement and dimensions meet code requirements as proposed. In all, the submitted proposal meets code and design requirements without issue. The question at hand for the Planning Commission, however, is the request to remove the cross access between this parcel and the existing commercial parcels to the east. Your Auto Wash was approved and built in the early 80’s and at that time the site was proposed with the cross access as we see it today. During those years the property owners never established any cross access easements or maintenance agreements. The Your Auto Wash sign existed out in front of the existing asphalt today but was forcibly removed as part of the Janesville Road reconstruction project and now struggles to find a home in front of the building due to existing traffic patterns and space. The City of Muskego zoning code now has a section that states commercial projects should promote cross access between parcels whenever possible and Planning Commission has required cross access many times before. To take away cross access now is against this code but the code does allow for Planning Commission waiver if desired. When considering this removal we should evaluate a couple items. First off, if the cross access is removed does this affect the parcels negatively? The city code states we usually establish cross access to “remove a much incidental, site to site traffic from adjacent roads as practical in order to reduce traffic conflicts and accidents.” In looking at Your Auto Wash the traffic pattern of coming off of Vine Street for access has been and will remain the same if this request is granted. Thus, there doesn’t appear to be a conflict here. The commercial parcels to the east have always had the one access point off of Janesville Road (see supplemental map) and would continue to do so. Having the cross access to Vine Street would allow business patrons to get to an open intersection of Janesville Road which they can’t today since there is a boulevard there. However, the east parcel could establish a different access route for deliveries and employees to the back portion of their lots between the two buildings that exist there out to Bay Lane Drive as an access point to Bay Lane is found there already as well. The owner of those parcels has told staff that he leases that back lot portion out for storage but that operation plan could be altered to better the site traffic for their site. Further, the city has had discussion with the owner of the parcels to the east that they would help advocate for another access point off of Janesville Road along their western borders should they look for those approvals and that the city could help with grant incentives to aid in this new access construction. Staff has spent considerable time on the sites to see how traffic flows between the properties in question here. In all, it appears that the petitioner is correct in that most, if not all, the traffic from the commercial properties to the east are traversing over the Your Auto Wash properties including many delivery trucks, etc. In the end, staff could go both ways on this issue. Just because the owners never established cross access easements and agreements over the past years is not a fault of the city and the city does like to require cross access whenever possible. However, staff doesn’t see that removing the cross access in this regar d will hamper the traffic patterns for each business parcel. Each parcel already has multiple access points, or at least the ability to establish multiple access points. The proposal would help make the site look nicer and the city is in a position to help the owner to the east to establish more access points if need be. Lastly, Waukesha County is in possession of the corner parcel along Janesville/Bay Lane (former Firestone parcel). When this commercial parcel sells it will require PC BSO approval and we can surely setup more cross access for the other parcels around that area as well. Staff will be letting the owner of the commercial properties to the east know about the PC meeting tonight for his comments as well. Other Note Plan Commission may note that the petitioner has included discussion in their submittal regarding the addition of a new dog wash. This item doesn’t need to be discussed as part of this proposal as the new dog wash is internal to one of the existing wash bays and isn’t a substantial change item to the site like the above items. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Resolution PC 037-2013 Approval of Resolution PC 037-2013 MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0100200 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 037-2013 Your Auto WashS73 W16555 Janesville Rd JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/23/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C.037-2013 APPROVAL OF A BUILDING, SITE, AND OPERATION PLAN AMENDENT FOR THE YOUR AUTO WASH PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 10 (TAX KEY NO. 2198.978 / S73 W16555 JANESVILLE ROAD) WHEREAS, On August 19, 2013 plans were submitted by Greg Foat for a Building, Site and Operation Plan amendment for the Your Auto Wash property located in the NW ¼ of Section 10 (Tax Key No. 2198.978 / S73 W16555 Janesville Road), and WHEREAS, The amendment is to add 10 foot wide landscaping area along the eastern property line that will include area for landscaping, a 3 ½ -foot split rail fence, and an area for replacement of the former sign for the property, and WHEREAS, The request would eliminate cross access of traffic to the commercial parcels found to the east of the petitioned property, and THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of an amended Building, Site and Operation Plan submitted by Greg Foat for the Your Auto Wash property located in the NW ¼ of Section 10 (Tax Key No. 2198.978 / S73 W16555 Janesville Road). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of said plans be kept on file in the Community Development Department and that all aspects of this plan shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise authorized by the Plan Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Denied: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 038-2013 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Building Site and Operation Plan for Summit Credit Union Tax Key Nos. 2167.995.010 SW ¼ of Section 2 PETITIONER: Peter Tan – Strang, Inc. INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Jeff Muenkel, AICP BACKGROUND PC 038-2013 Strang, Inc. has submitted plans to construct a 3,165 square foot building for Summit Credit Union on Moorland Road just north of Janesville Road. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 038-2013 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the areas for commercial use. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned PD-34 Planned Development District. The PD was approved to allow commercial uses such as the petitioned. The structures conform to the bulk dimension requirements of the District. Park and Open Space Plan: No acquisitions are proposed in this area. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Conservation Plan: No acquisition or management priorities are depicted in this area. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Street System Plan: Moorland Road was previously dedicated. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Adopted 208 Sanitary Sewer Service Area: Public sanitary sewer serves the property. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Water Capacity Assessment District: The property is served by public water service. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Stormwater Management Plan: Stormwater is already accounted for in the existing stormwater pond that exists to the south of this proposal. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Moorland South Design Guide The Moorland South Design Guide promotes structures with Craftsman and Prairie Style Architecture. The proposed appears to meet this requirement well and this is discussed in more detail below. DISCUSSION PC 038-2013 The submittal is included in the supplement consisting of a narrative, site/utility/grading plans, building elevations, colored renderings, landscape plans, photometric plan, and lighting details. As stated above, the petitioner requests approvals for a new financial institution on the west portion of the Kohl’s shopping complex along Moorland Road. The proposed building will be 3,165 square feet designed with prairie architecture situated on a .74 acre site. Architecture This area of the City is governed by the General Design Guide, but more directly the Moorland South Design Guide. The General Design Guide calls for 50% masonry product and the proposed structur e meets this main requirement. The Moorland South Design Guide gets into more detail and looks to promote structures with four sided Craftsman and Prairie Style Architecture. The building materials consist of more than 50% of Endicott Manganese Ironspot brick, cast stone horizontal accent bands and window sills of limestone colored cast stone, aluminum storefront window systems in a clear anodized aluminum finish, recycled wood composite cladding for the horizontal roof overhang fascia, and metal coping and accent trim on horizontal roof overhang fascia to match finish of window frames. The building is strategically designed so that its most public facades are orientated toward Moorland Road with parking and drive up teller stalls orientated away from the main street corner. The structure has a very unique design with multiple uses of materials, a mix of horizontal and vertical lines, undulating roofs, and altering depths along each façade. The developers show in the submittal that they are meeting the Prairie Style Architecture requirement in a variety of new ways not all necessarily seen in the rest of the buildings previously proposed around the Moorland Road South Design Guide. The proposal shows detailed notes on how the architectural elements proposed meet prairie style architecture including the following: Building has a dominant, hovering gable roof with a horizontal ridge and deep overhangs in keeping with the prairie idiom Gable roof in keeping with the design guides requirement for pitched roof forms Northwest eave of the pitched roof is not parallel to the ridge creating a high point or prow on the interior of the conference room in the structure Pinwheeling composition of the horizontal masses are anchored by planar, directional piers, that define the layering of space from the interior to the exterior Facing Moorland Road is a transparent volume of the main conference room that is anchored by a fireplace hearth, which is another part of the prairie idiom Vertical fabric sunshades that shade the glass wall of the southwest façade add interest to the Moorland Road elevation Variety of materials situated in horizontal formats as described below Note that the submitted supplement details similar roof forms in Frank Lloyd Wright design First Unitaria n Society Meeting House in Madison, Wisconsin. Also, the supplement details the Frank Lloyd Wright Gale House at the Yahara Boat Club showing the single dominant roof that hovers over a mass of building which inspired their Summit Credit Union design tonight. In all, staff believes that while this design is unique to the area it does meet the intent of the Moorland South design Guide and prairie architecture techniques. Site Plan, Access, and Parking The .74 acre site is vacant and pad-ready for development today as the property was developed via the Kohl’s Center Complex in the past. Vehicular access meets code throughout the site as two-way drive aisles are at least 24 feet in width and one-way aisles are at least 12 feet in width. Vehicular access to the site is shown to occur in two access points off of the private internal drive of the Aurora/Kohl’s shopping complex; no access is allowed or shown along Moorland Road. Parking is shown as 14 stalls all meeting the city code dimensions of 10’x20’. The amount of parking stalls provided exceeds typical code requirements for a commercial facility of this type as Muskego typically ensures that 1 stall is required per 150 SF of customer floor area. The building has 1,950 SF of customer floor area which would require 13 stalls usually. It should be noted that two (2) bicycle parking sites are found up along the building. Fire Department Approval The site plan is still subject to Fire Department approvals at the time of building permits as well. Possible changes to the site plan may be required based upon the final Fire Department review. Dumpsters/Refuse Containers/Outdoor Storage A dumpster enclosure is proposed along the southeast portion of the site. The enclosure will be constructed of similar materials to the overall structure. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted as part of the proposal. Review of the landscape plan is pending and the City Forester will work with the petitioner based upon any changes/additions that are needed. In all, a wealth of landscaping is proposed in the new parking lot, along the foundations of the entire structure, and along the Moorland Road right-of-way. Signage Signage is part of the submittal and is shown to be a monument sign along the northeast portion of the site along with various wall signage and all signage proposed appears to meet code requirements but will be subject to future staff approvals. Three “sunshades” are part of the architecture of the building along the west façade and these shades are triangular in shape and extend from the grade of the site up to the main roofline. The sunscreens are intended to simply have graphics and/or images adorning them (see other location pictures in supplement). The resolution is worded to allow the sunscreens to have graphics and/or images subject to the approval of the Community Development Department before any new ones are erected. Further that the sunscreens cannot be signage and contain any wording without the prior approval of the Planning Commission. Lighting A photometric plan has been submitted and shows appropriate lighting levels per code on the site. Site lighting is proposed as approximately six (6) polelights and various bollard and structure wall pack lights. The pole lights proposed will match the Kohl’s complex planned development in design but may be more of a metallic color to match the building. All lights are shown to be metal halide. Lighting details and photometrics show that all City of Muskego requirements are being met. The resolution requires that all pole bollards are no more than 6” above grade and the submitted plans show this as well. Sewer, Water, Storm, Grading The development will be served by existing public sanitary sewer and water. Further, all stormwater arrangements have been accommodated for when the Kohl’s Department Store development was constructed. Other The following is also part of the Plan Commission resolution: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a separate sign permit will be required before any signage (temporary or permanent) can be installed and this includes any signage on the building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The site plan is still subject to Fire Department approvals at the time of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All lighting fixtures must be full cut-off with a zero degree tilt and the concrete bases for the pole lights cannot exceed 6 inches in height above grade. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, A final landscape plan will need to be approved by the City Forester prior to the issuance of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any bollards must be painted to match the colors of the principal structure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any new handicap signs be incorporated into bored bollards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That all roof top and ground mechanicals (including HVAC devices, electrical transformers, etc.) must be screened from view and/or incorporated into the design of the site/structure (screening, etc.) and should be approved by the Community Development Department. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 038-2013 Approval of Resolution PC 038-2013. MUSKEGOthe City of Area of Interest 0 80 160 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 038-2013 Summit Credit Union Moorland Road JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/28/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C. 038-2013 APPROVAL OF A BUILDING SITE AND OPERATION PLAN FOR SUMMIT CREDIT UNION LOCATED IN THE SW ¼ OF SECTION 2 (MOORLAND ROAD / TAX KEY NO. 2167.995.010) WHEREAS, On August 19, 2013 plans were submitted by Strang, Inc. for a Building, Site and Operation Plan for Summit Credit Union located in the SW ¼ of Section 2 (Moorland Road / Tax Key No. 2167.995.010), and WHEREAS, Said property is currently zoned PD-34 Planned Development District, and said commercial use is a permitted use within this zoned Planned Development, and WHEREAS, The 2020 Comprehensive Plan shows this property as commercial uses and the proposal is consistent with the plan, and WHEREAS, The proposal is to build a new financial institution totaling 3,165 square feet situated on a .74 acre site, and WHEREAS, This site is governed by the General Design Guide and the Moorland South Design Guide, and WHEREAS, The operations will be of a typical financial institution with three drive thru teller aisles, walk in lobby and various staff support needs, and WHEREAS, The intended hours will be approximately M-F 8am-5pm and Sat 8am – noon with drive teller aisles open from M-F 7am-6pm and Sat 8am – noon, and WHEREAS, The building is strategically designed so that its most public facades are orientated toward Moorland Road with parking and drive up teller stalls orientated away from the main street corner, and WHEREAS, The structure has a very unique design with multiple uses of materials, a mix of horizontal and vertical lines, undulating roofs, and altering depths along each façade, and WHEREAS, The General Design Guide calls for 50% masonry product and the proposed structure meets this main requirement, and WHEREAS, The Moorland South Design Guide looks to promote structures with Craftsman and Prairie Style Architecture, and WHEREAS, The developers show in the submittal that they are meeting the Prairie Style Architecture requirement in a variety of new ways not all necessarily seen in the rest of the buildings previously proposed around the Moorland Road South Design Guide, and WHEREAS, The proposal shows detailed notes on how the architectural elements proposed meet prairie style architecture including the following: Building has a dominant, hovering gable roof with a horizontal ridge and deep overhangs in keeping with the prairie idiom, Gable roof in keeping with the design guides requirement for pitched roof forms, Northwest eave of the pitched roof is not parallel to the ridge creating a high point or prow on the interior of the conference room in the structure, Pinwheeling composition of the horizontal masses are anchored by planar, directional piers, that define the layering of space from the interior to the exterior, Facing Moorland Road is a transparent volume of the main conference room that is anchored by a fireplace hearth, which is another part of the prairie idiom, Vertical fabric sunshades that shade the glass wall of the southwest façade add interest to the Moorland Road elevation, Variety of materials situated in horizontal formats as described below, and WHEREAS, The building materials consist of more than 50% of Endicott Manganese Ironspot brick, cast stone horizontal accent bands and window sills of limestone colored cast stone, aluminum storefront window systems in a clear anodized aluminum finish, recycled wood composite cladding for the horizontal roof overhang fascia’s, and metal coping and accent trim on horizontal roof overhang fascia to match finish of the window frames, and WHEREAS, The building height is proposed as 24’8” to the top of the highest coping, and WHEREAS, The colors of the structure are shown to be a variety of earth tones, and WHEREAS, Vehicular access meets code throughout the site as two-way drive aisles and are at least 24 feet in width and one-way aisles are at least 12 feet in width, and WHEREAS, Vehicular access to the site is shown to occur in two access points off of the private internal drive of the Aurora/Kohl’s shopping complex; no access is allowed or shown along Moorland Road, and WHEREAS, Parking is shown as 14 stalls all meeting the city code dimensions of 10’x20’, and WHEREAS, The amount of parking stalls provided exceeds typical code requirements for a commercial facility of this type as Muskego typically ensures that 1 stall is required per 150 SF of customer floor area; the building has 1,950 SF of customer floor area which would require 13 stalls usually, and WHEREAS, Two (2) bicycle parking sites are found up along the building, and WHEREAS, The site and building plans are subject to Fire Department approvals, and WHEREAS, A dumpster enclosure is proposed along the southeast portion of the site and the enclosure will be constructed of similar materials to the overall structure, and WHEREAS, A landscape plan has been submitted as part of the proposal and review is pending, and WHEREAS, A wealth of landscaping is proposed in the new parking lot, along the foundations of the entire structure, and along the Moorland Road right-of-way, and WHEREAS, Signage is part of the submittal and is shown to be a monument sign along the northeast portion of the site along with various wall signage and all signage proposed appears to meet code requirements but will be subject to future staff approvals, and WHEREAS, Three “sunshades” are part of the architecture of the building along the west façade and these shades are triangular in shape and extend from the grade of the site up to the main roofline, and WHEREAS, It is proposed that the sunscreens contain images and graphics but not any wording or signage, and WHEREAS, Site lighting is proposed as approximately six (6) polelights and various bollard and structure wall pack lights, and WHEREAS, The pole lights proposed will match the Kohl’s complex planned development in design but may be more of a metallic color to match the building proposed, and WHEREAS, A photometric plan has been submitted and shows appropriate lighting levels per code, and WHEREAS, The development will be served by existing public sanitary sewer and water, and WHEREAS, All stormwater arrangements have been accommodated for when the Kohl’s Department Store development was constructed. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of the Building, Site and Operation Plan for Summit Credit Union submitted by Strang, Inc for the property located in the SW ¼ of Section 2 (Moorland Road / Tax Key No. 2167.995.010). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the sunscreens are allowed to have graphics and images always subject to the approval of the Community Development Department before any new ones are erected. Further, that the sunscreens cannot be signage and contain any wording without the prior approval of the Planning Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, A separate sign permit will be required before any signage (temporary or permanent) can be installed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The site plan is still subject to Fire Department approvals at the time of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All lighting fixtures must be full cut-off with a zero degree tilt and the concrete bases for the pole lights cannot exceed 6 inches in height above grade. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, A final landscape plan will need to be approved by the City Forester prior to the issuance of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That all pole bollards are no more than 6” in height above grade. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any bollards must be painted to match the colors of the principal structure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any new handicap signs be incorporated into bored bollards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That all roof top and ground mechanicals (including HVAC devices, electrical transformers, etc.) must be screened from view and/or incorporated into the design of the site/structure (screening, etc.) and should be approved by the Community Development Department. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of said plans be kept on file in the Building Department and that all aspects of this plan shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise authorized by the Plan Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary To: City of Muskego Planning Department and Plan Commission Project: Summit Credit Union Muskego, Wisconsin Owner’s Summit Credit Union Contact: 4800 American Parkway Madison Wisconsin 53718 Attn: Jeremy Eppler 608-243-5000, extension 4407 Architect: Strang, Inc. 6411 Mineral Point Road Madison, WI 53705 Attn: Peter Tan 608-276-9200 Civil JSD Professional Services Engineer: 161 Horizon Drive, Suite 101 Verona, Wisconsin 53593 Attn: Wade Wyse 608-848-5060 Landscape JSD Professional Services Architect: 161 Horizon Drive, Suite 101 Verona, Wisconsin 53593 Attn: Mike Schmeltzer 608-848-5060 Zoning Data Current Zoning: B3 General Business District Proposed Use: a financial institution drive-through teller facilities for the financial institution Project Statistics Legal: refer to site survey attached to the project drawings Lot Area: 32,240 square feet, 0.7401 acres Lot Coverage: Impervious = 20,278 sq. ft. (62.90% of site) 3,165 sq. ft. building “footprint” 16,613 sq. ft. parking and drive aisles 500 sq. ft. sidewalk Pervious area = 11,962 sq. ft. (37.10% of site) Lawn, landscaped areas, drainage ways Building Area: 3,165 total gross square feet total “footprint” Floor Area Ratio: 9.82% Building height: 1 story 24’-8” feet to top of highest coping Parking Credit Union = 3,165 gross sq. ft. Employees = 7 max, 5 normal Members = 7 max, 5 normal Maximum actual need = 14 stalls. Customer area = 1,950 sf. 1,950 sf / 1 stall per 150 sf = 13 stalls required 14 parking stalls provided on site (including 1 handicapped accessible stall) Bicycle parking: 2 stalls provided near building entrance for staff and customers Signage Wall Signs: Wall signs are proposed that are intended to meet the requirements of the Zoning Code: - Northwest façade: Two “Summit Credit Union signs are proposed, whose total square footage is equal to 5% of the total wall area of the northwest façade. - Southeast façade: Two “Summit Credit Union signs are proposed, whose total square footage is equal to 5% of the total wall area of the southeast façade. - Northeast façade: One “Summit Credit Union signs is proposed, whose total square footage is equal to 5% of the total wall area of the northeast façade. Monument Sign: Following are: - a photo of a similar monument sign for the Summit Credit Union branch in West Allis. - drawings of the proposed monument sign at the north corner of the site Description of Intended Use Financial Institution: Operational characteristics will be those of a typical financial institution. Three drive-through teller aisles will serve credit union members from their autos. The building will have a walk-in lobby for credit union members who wish to conduct business with a teller or financial adviser, and for people wishing to become members of the credit union. The “back of house” area will contain storage, a staff break room, and other support spaces. For walk-in customers, the lobby will be open from approximately 8:00 am until 5:00 pm Monday through Friday and from 8:00 am to noon on Saturday. The drive-through teller lanes will be open from approximately 7:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday and from 8:00 am to noon on Saturday. An ATM machine on the outer-most drive-through lane will be available at all times. Design Narrative Site Design Considerations: The site is located on Moorland Road, at one of the major gateways to the development. The building is placed so that its most public facades are oriented toward Moorland Road, with parking and the drive-up teller oriented away from the main street corner. The building respects the 40’ setback from Moorland road, with the allowed 2’ encroachment of the roof overhang. The drives and parking areas, respect the 10’ setback from Moorland Road, and the 3’ setback at the three other yards. The 25’ Fire Access Lane is designed to meet the requirement of being at least 10’ and no more than 30’ from the building, and is accessible to 50% of the north west facade of the building. Building Design Considerations: Prairie Style: The building has a dominant, hovering gable roof with a horizontal ridge and deep overhangs, in keeping with the Prairie idiom. The choice of the gable roof is in keeping with Design Guide’s requirements for pitched roof forms. In order to make it more dynamic, the northwest eave of this roof is not parallel to the ridge. This creates a high point/”prow” at the conference room (Moorland road façade). Below is a photograph of the First Unitarian Society Meeting House in Madison to illustrate an iconic Frank Lloyd Wright Prairie Style building with a similar roof form. First Unitarian Society Meeting House, Madison Below are drawings of the Gale House and the Yahara Boat Club from Frank Lloyd Wright’s 1910 Wasmuth Portfolio, which is widely regarded to be the definitive monograph of Prairie Architectural design. They illustrate how hovering flat roofs and horizontally oriented fenestration are signature characteristics of the prairie idiom. The Yahara Boathouse in particular, has a single dominant roof that hovers over the mass of the building plinth, and this feature has inspired the overall design expression of our proposal. Thomas Gale House Yahara Boat Club The pinwheeling composition of the horizontal masses are anchored by planar, directional piers, that define the layering of space from the interior to the exterior. Facing Moorland Road is the transparent volume of the main conference room, the metaphorical “living room” that is anchored by a fireplace hearth, a quintessential part of the Prairie idiom. Vertical fabric sunshades that shade the glass wall of the southwest façade add interest to the Moorland Road elevation Exterior Materials and Colors: Brick: Brick comprises more than 50% of the non-window exterior surface of the building. The brick proposed is Endicott Manganese Ironspot brick, whose color is in keeping with the Moorland Corridor South Design Guide. Cast Stone: Horizontal accent bands and window sills consisting of a limestone colored cast stone contribute to the horizontal expression of the building. Windows: Aluminum storefront system in a clear anodized aluminum finish. Horizontal roof overhang fascias: Recycled wood composite cladding in a teak color. (e.g. Geolam www.geolaminc.com ). The choice of this material reflects the color parameters in the Moorland Corridor South Design Guide, and underscores Summit Credit Union’s commitment to sustainability. Copings and accent trim on horizontal roof overhang fascias: Metal to match finish of window frames. Mechanical equipment screening: Ground mounted mechanical equipment at the east corner of the building is screened by landscaping, as indicated in the Landscape Plan. © 2012 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # DIMENSIONS SHIPPING WEIGHTS - Greenbriar Small LUMINAIRE EPA CHART - Greenbriar Small Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult factory. Catalog Number Est. Weight (kg/lbs.)Length (mm/in.) Width (mm/in.) Height (mm/in.) Flat Glass Single D180° D90° T90° TN120° Q90° Bracket – 2-bolt Pattern 14" (356mm) 14" (356mm) 2-1/2" (64mm) 8" (203mm) 8" (203mm) 5 3/8" (137mm) 1.4 2.8 3.8 3.9 4.8 2.4 GB 10/23 432/17 419/16.5 356/14 GREENBRIAR® - SMALL (Various reflectors are protected by U.S. Patent No. 6,464,378.) Flat-lensed fixtures meet IESNA full cutoff classificationCOMMUNITY FRIENDLY HOUSING - One-piece aluminum housing. Corners are welded and finished to produce a clean, sharp appearance while increasing housing strength and ensuring weather-tight construction. DOOR FRAME - Two captive stainless steel machine screws which secure the aluminum lens frame assembly to the main housing allow for easy access with no loose hardware. LENS/GASKET - Available with two lens options, including a flat clear tempered glass and a C73 diffused flat tempered glass. Each Greenbriar lens is sealed to the lens frame with EPDM gasketing. The lens frame has a continuous, one-piece EPDM gasket for maximum sealing to the housing. SOCKETS - Porcelain sockets. All fixtures are equipped with medium-base sockets except type AH which is equipped with a mogul-base socket. All mogul-base sockets are pulse-rated. LIGHT SOURCES - Pulse-Start Metal Halide, Ceramic Metal Halide, Metal Halide, or High Pressure Sodium. All lamps are medium base except Asymmetrical Horizontal Burn (AH) which has a mogul base. Clear lamp is supplied as standard. BALLASTS - High-power factor ballast. High Pressure Sodium fixtures feature a type HX-HPF or an R-HPF ballast. Pulse-Start Metal Halide fixtures feature a type CWA ballast. Metal Halide fixtures feature a CWA or HX-HPF ballast. All ballasts are designed for -20° F operation. REFLECTORS/DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS Available in five reflector systems and distribution patterns: Type II (2) and Type III (3) with vertical burn lamp. Forward Throw (FT) with horizontal burn, Type V Square (5) with vertical burn lamp and Asymmetrical (AH) with horizontal burn lamp. Photometric data is tested in accordance with IESNA guidelines. BRACKETS - Use with 5” traditional drilling pattern. A 2-1/2” x 5-3/8” x 8” bolt-on bracket is shipped standard. A round pole plate (RPP2) is required for mounting to 3”-5” round poles (See Accessory Ordering Information chart). FINISHES - Each fixture is finished with LSI’s DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling, and is guaranteed for five full years. Standard colors include bronze, black, platinum plus, white, satin verde green, metallic silver, and graphite. PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.lsi-industries.com for detailed photometric data. ARRA Funding Compliant American Made American Innovation 82 O U T D O O R 12/06/11 © 2012 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE: Luminaire Prefix Distribution Light Source LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION Lamp Wattage ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION Description Order Number Description Order Number (Accessories are field installed) Line Voltage Luminaire Finish Options 480 MT – Multi Tap TT – Tri-Tap BRZ – Bronze BLK – Black PLP – Platinum Plus WHT – White SVG - Satin Verde Green GPT - Graphite MSV - Metallic Silver F – Flat Clear Tempered Glass 73 – C73 Diffused Flat Tempered Glass PSMV – Pulse-Start Metal Halide 175 Watt CMH – CeramicMetal Halide 150 Watt MH – Metal Halide 100 Watt HPS – High Pressure Sodium 100, 150 Watt PSMH – Pulse-Start Metal Halide 175 Watt CMH – CeramicMetal Halide 150 Watt HPS – High Pressure Sodium 150 Watt 100 150 175 150 175 2 – Type II Vertical Burn 3 – Type III Vertical Burn FT – Forward Throw Horizontal Burn 1 5 – Type V Vertical Burn AH – Asymmetrical (Mogul Base) 2 Horizontal Burn GB PCR – Photoelectric Control Receptacle 3 LL – Less Lamp FOOTNOTES: 1- Available in CMH, MH, or HPS light sources only 2- All lamps have a medium base except Asymmetrical Horizontal Burn (AH) which has a mogul base. 3- PCR factory installed and prewired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field re-wiring. Photocell must be ordered seperately - see Accessories GB 5 175 PSMV F MT BRZ PCR Lens Consult Factory for International Voltages and Light Sources 122514+ 122515+ 159516+ 1225180+ FK120++ FK277++ DFK208, 240++ DFK480++ FK347++ 122528BLK+++ 162914BLK+++ 123111CLR DFK480 - Double Fusing FK347 - Single Fusing HSS – House Side Shield RPP2 – Round Pole Plate BKS-BO-WM-*-CLR Wall Mount Plate PC120 – Photocell PC208-277 – Photocell for 208V, 240V or 277V PC347 – Photocell PC480 – Photocell FK120 - Single Fusing FK277 - Single Fusing DFK208, 240 - Double Fusing +Factory Installed PCR option required. ++ Fusing must be located in the hand-hole of the pole - not in the fixture +++ Black only. MT – Multi Tap consists of 120V, 208V, 240V and 277V and is prepared for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field adjustment. TT – Tri-Tap consists of 120V, 277V and 347V and is shipped standard for Canadian applications and is prepared for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field adjustment. GREENBRIAR® - SMALL O U T D O O R 12/06/11 83 VRB3 Round Bollard Single Function, Vandal-Resistant, Aluminum Shaft revision 11/13/09 • vrb3.pdf Approvals: Specifications Date: Page: 1 of 3 Type: Job: Catalog number: © 2009 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5616509317 VRB3 / // Fixture Electrical Module Luminaire Finish Options (includes top cap and shaft) See page 2 8" DIA. (203.2 mm) 9" (228.6 mm) 8" DIA. (203.2 mm) 6" (152.4 mm) VRB Models 70 to 100 watt Medium Base Lamps 42 watt Compact Fluorescent 1K" ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION (38.1 mm) VRB3 - Single Function Luminaire (Aluminum Shaft) Maximum weight: 30 lb BASE PLAN VRB ALUMINUM SHAFT *30" OR 36" OVERALL HEIGHT AVAILABLE - CONTACT KIM REPRESENTATIVE (27K" ABSOLUTE MINIMUM) 5" BOLT CIRCLE DIA. (127.0 mm) 42"* (1066.8 mm) 36" LIGHT CENTER HEIGHT (914.4 mm) 360° 3L" CONDUIT OPENING (95.3 mm) Flat Top Cap:One-piece sand-cast F"minimum thickness, secured to louvers by concealed allen screws in keyhole slots. For relamping access, allen screws shall not require complete removal. Louvers:Aluminum die-cast with vertical support ribs at 90° intervals. Horizontal louver blades shall have a 1L"depth, a 65° upward pitch and provide light source cutoff above horizontal. Louver assembly shall be secured to shaft by four internal tie rods. Lamp Enclosure:One-piece tempered molded glass with internal flutes and full gasketing at bottom edge. Socket:Porcelain medium base socket rated 4KV for HID and incandescent. Plastic socket for Fluorescent. Fixture Head:Allows flow-through ventilation around and above the lamp enclosure. Shaft:One-piece extruded aluminum, .125"wall thickness with a heavy cast aluminum twist-lock anchor base concealed within the shaft. Concealed set screws shall lock shaft onto the cast anchor base. Ballast:Factory mounted to rigid harness attached to the anchor base. Wiring shall be supplied from the socket for field connection to the prewired ballast components. HID:High power factor with starting temperatures of -20°F. for PMH and -40°F. for HPS lamp modes. 26W, 32W, 42W Fluorescent:High power factor with starting temperature of 0°F. Anchor Bolts:Four C"x 10"+ 2"zinc plated L-hooks, each with two nuts, washers and a rigid pressed board template. Finish:Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test endurance rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Stealth Gray™, Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. CAUTION:Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/or local codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listings and Ratings UL cUL 15981 –25C Ambient IP46 Rated FS = Fully Shielded2 CE 1Suitable for wet locations 2Dark Sky Legislation Compliant KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHNGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. Fixture Cat. No. VRB3 Single Function, Aluminum Shaft, Flat Top VRB3 Round Bollard Single Function, Vandal-Resistant, Aluminum Shaft revision 11/13/09 • vrb3.pdf Page: 2 of 3 Type: Job: Standard and Optional Features © 2009 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5616509317 70PMH120 100PMH120 70HPS120 100HPS120 70PMH208 100PMH208 70HPS208 100HPS208 70PMH240 100PMH240 70HPS240 100HPS240 70PMH277 100PMH277 70HPS277 100HPS277 70PMH347 100PMH347 70HPS347 100HPS347 Lamp E-17, Coated E-17, Coated ED-17, Coated ED-17, Coated Socket Medium Base Medium Base Medium Base Medium Base ANSI Ballast M-98 M-90 S-62 S-54 Type 42PL1201 Lamp Compact Fluor. Socket GX24q-4 142PL operates one 26, 32, or 42 watt lamp at 120 thru 277 volts (50-60 Hz). NOTE:Coated lamps are recommended. Cat. Nos. for Electrical Modules available: Finish Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating on fixture and shaft. NOTE:Black and Dark Bronze colors will produce slightly less louver brightness than Light Gray or White. 2Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representative. Custom color description: NOTE:For lamp/ballast information outside of the U.S.A. and Canada, please consult your local Kim representative. Optional Houseside Shield Cat. No.HS No Option 180° trimmable houseside shield that inserts inside lamp enclosure. .032"thick natural aluminum, trimmable in field. Lamp Lamp Line Watts Type Volts 100 PMH 120 Electrical Module PMH = Pulse Start Metal Halide HPS = High Pressure Sodium PL = Compact Fluorescent Color:Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Stealth Gray™ Platinum Silver White Custom Color 2 Cat. No.:BL DB LG SG PS WH CC Optional Emergency Battery Back-up Cat. No.EM No Option Internal battery pack provides 90 minutes of supplemental light at 23% of initial lamp lumens for 26, 32, or 42 watt compact fluorescent lamps.battery back-up VRB3 Round Bollard Single Function, Vandal-Resistant, Aluminum Shaft revision 11/13/09 • vrb3.pdf Page: 3 of 3 Type: Job: Standard and Optional Features © 2009 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5616509317 Cold-Pack Emergency Battery Pack Cat. No.EM-CP No Option The EM-CP option is a temperature controlled ballast designed to maintain operation without interruption within a range of hi/low ambient temperatures, -20°C to +55°C. Internal Cold-Pack emergency battery pack provides up to 90 minutes of supplemental light. See following table for max. lumens output by lamps. cold-pack battery back-up Lamp (4-Pin) 1 lamp lumens 42W 750 32W 575 26W 450 Wall Light WTN, WRN, WBN LED Mini Wall LIght application • The LED Mini Wall Light offers a compact, low profile design that is perfect for low mounting applications where aesthetics and performance are desired. The unit is excellent for security, perimeter, or decorative lighting in areas such as building facades, entrances, pathways, and alleys. construction/finish • Die cast aluminum housing designed for excellent thermal transfer to extend component life. • Button photo control is optional. • Silicone gasketing provides protection against moisture. • Mounts directly to 3-1/2" octagon or 4" square outlet box. • Polyester powder finish for impact, corrosion and UV resistance. • Frosted tempered glass lens is thermal and impact resistant. • Quick mount wall plate for easy installation. • Components are RoHS compliant. • LED light engine and driver are field replaceable. electrical • Certified to meet UL 1598 standards for wet location and 40°C ambient. warranty • 5 Year Limited Warranty. Project Type Model No. Comments Specifier’s Reference Green Choice: WTN24WLU-MC3 WL-43200 rev. 2, 7/14/11 L 24W WTN WRN WBN Family 24W – 24W Neutral White (4100K) L – LED Blank – General Distribution SC2 – Wide Distribution MC3 – Medium Distribution FWT – Forward Throw Wattage Lamp Source Optics U – Universal 120-277 volts 550Hz or 60Hz 12DC – 12V DC (Emergency battery input only - no AC) Voltage Accessories (Order Separately) To use as a 12VDC emergency head, combine with mcPhilben emergency units below. See mcPhilben spec sheets for detailed information. Blank – Dark Bronze Textured WT – White Textured BK – Black Textured AL – Silver Aluminum Textured NP – Gray Aluminum Textured GY – Industrial Gray Textured CP – Metallic Copper BM – Metallic Bronze NK – Metallic Nickel GS – Greystone BS – Brownstone (Consult factory for other colors) Paint Colors PE – Photo Control Options General Notes: All options are factory installed. All accessories are field installed. Data subject to change without notice. ––– Predicted L70 Lifetime: 25˚C Ambient->60,000 hours 40˚C Ambient- 50,000 hours (based upon LED manufacturer’s supplied LM-80 data and in-situ laboratory testing). CTXR12L72WRL – 12V 72W Lead acid battery CTXR12N24WRL – 12V 24W Nicad battery CTXR12N48WRL – 12V 48W Nicad battery WL-43200 rev. 2, 7/14/11 LED Mini Wall Light Contact Factory for Additional Configurations. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Consult website for latest version of this spec sheet. Some luminaires use fluorescent or high intensity discharge (HID) lamps that contain small amounts of mercury. Such lamps are labeled, “Contain Mercury” and/or the symbol “HG”. Lamps that contain mercury must be disposed of in accordance with local requirements. Information regarding lamp recycling and disposal can be found at www.lamprecycle.org ©2011 Philips Day-Brite All rights reserved. 776 South Green Street • Tupelo, MS 38804 p. 800.234.1890 • f. 662.841.5501 • www.daybrite.com Canadian Division 189 Bullock Drive • Markham, Ontario L3P 1W4 p. 905.294.9570 • f. 905.294.9811 Catalog No. WRN24WLU-SC2 Test No. 28525 Wattage 21 Lumens 577 Tilt Angle 0° Mounting Height 8 Feet Catalog No. WRN24WLU Test No. 29290 Wattage 27 Lumens 883 Tilt Angle 0° Mounting Height 8 Feet 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 .5 .2 .1 1 2 12 1 0 2 5 2 1 .5 .2 .1 Units shown in terms of mounting height Initial Footcandles Shown Units shown in terms of mounting height Initial Footcandles Shown photometry Light Level Multiplying Factors Mounting Height 15' 12' 10' 8' Multiplier 0.28 0.44 0.64 1.00 Catalog No. WRN24WLU-FWT Test No. 28523 Wattage 21 Lumens 454 Tilt Angle 0° Mounting Height 8 Feet Catalog No. WRN24WLU-MC3 Test No. 28524 Wattage 22 Lumens 518 Tilt Angle 0° Mounting Height 8 Feet 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 5 2 1 .5 .2 .1 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 .5 .2 .1 Units shown in terms of mounting height Initial Footcandles Shown Units shown in terms of mounting height Initial Footcandles Shown dimensions MOUNTING PLATE 4-13/16" (122.2 mm) (88.9 mm) 3-1/2" 1-7/8" DIA. HOLE 4" (101.6 mm)(190.5 mm) 7-1/2" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" 4" (101.6 mm)(203.2 mm) 8" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" 4" (101.6 mm)(200 mm) 7-7/8" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" MOUNTING PLATE 4-13/16" (122.2 mm) (88.9 mm) 3-1/2" 1-7/8" DIA. HOLE 4" (101.6 mm)(190.5 mm) 7-1/2" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" 4" (101.6 mm)(203.2 mm) 8" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" 4" (101.6 mm)(200 mm) 7-7/8" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" MOUNTING PLATE 4-13/16"(122.2 mm) (88.9 mm) 3-1/2" 1-7/8" DIA. HOLE 4" (101.6 mm)(190.5 mm) 7-1/2" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" 4" (101.6 mm)(203.2 mm) 8" (174.6 mm) 6-7/8" 4"(101.6 mm)(200 mm)7-7/8"(174.6 mm)6-7/8" WBNWTN WRN Weight = 5 lbs. (max.) Note: Photometric values based on tests performed in compliance with LM-79. City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 039-2013 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Building, Site, and Operation Plan Amendments for Royal Recognition Tax Key No. 2228.999.008 / S83 W19105 Saturn Drive SE ¼ of Section 17 PETITIONER: Eric Neumann – MSI General Corp. INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Jeff Muenkel, AICP BACKGROUND PC 039-2013 On August 16, 2013 a submittal was received from MSI General Corp. for Royal Recognition to add an additional 11,218 SF of warehouse space to their existing warehouse and office facility in order to meet the needs of their growing business. CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED PLANS 039-2013 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the property for industrial uses. The petition is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is zoned M-2, General Industrial. The use is permitted subject to BSO approval. STAFF DISCUSSION PC 039-2013 As mentioned above, the proposal is for Royal Recognition, a local Muskego Business Park business, to expand their existing warehouse/office structure by 11,218 sq ft in more warehousing space to aid their growing company. Royal Recognition is located at the far western end of Saturn Drive on the court. The addition will extend off the western portion of the existing building and various site improvements including the addition of more parking lot is part of the proposal. Architecture The building addition is proposed to be clad with steel wall panels, a steel roof, metal framed bronze window units, and various insulated overhead doors. All materials and colors proposed will match the existing building materials found on the existing structure. When the building was originally approved just the office area and the front facade facing Saturn Drive had masonry product. The addition proposed matches the material usage found along the other facades not facing Saturn Drive. Plan Commission usually has allowed additions that match the existing materials of the principal structure to remain even if 50% masonry is not found. In this case the addition is again mostly out of site and will match nicely to the existing structure. Thus, approval is recommended below as submitted. A new overhead door access out to Saturn Drive is part of the submittal as well that will mimic the design and materials that exist for the existing overhead door (see east elevation). Site One item of note is that there is some man made wetlands along the northwest corner of the site plan. The petitioners have a wetland fill permit into the DNR for the minor filling of a portion of these wetlands in order for the building proposed to take place. The Plan Commission approval is subject to the petitioners receiving that permit from the DNR. Access to the new addition is all internally accessible with the exception of few fire doors around the perimeter. The site plan shows the addition of ten (10) new parking stalls which follow the existing flow of the site. No new lighting or landscaping is required for the addition given the location. The permit for this project is subject to Fire Department review for any Fire Access Lane needs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 039-2013 Approval of Resolution PC 039-2013. MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0110220 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 039-2013 Royal Recognition S83 W19105 Saturn Drive JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/23/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C. 039-2013 APPROVAL OF A BUILDING SITE AND OPERATION PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ROYAL RECOGNITION LOCATED IN THE SE ¼ OF SECTION 17 (TAX KEY 2228.999.008 / S83 W19105 SATURN DR) WHEREAS, On August 16, 2013 a submittal was received from MSI General Corp. for Royal Recognition located at S83 W19105 Saturn Drive (Tax Key No. 2228.999.008), and WHEREAS, An addition of 11,218 sq ft is proposed to add on more warehousing to the facility, and WHEREAS, The new accessory structure is proposed to be clad with steel wall panels, a steel roof, metal framed bronze window units, and various insulated overhead doors and all materials and colors proposed will match the existing building materials found on the existing structure, and WHEREAS, The General Design Guide calls for commercial/industrial structures to be 50% masonry at Planning Commission discretion, and WHEREAS, The addition proposed matches the material usage found along the other facades not facing Saturn Drive, and WHEREAS, Wetlands are found along the northwest corner of the site plan, and WHEREAS, Access to the new addition is all internally accessible with the exception of few fire doors around the perimeter and the site plan shows the addition of ten (10) new parking stalls which follow the existing flow of the site. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of an amended Building, Site and Operation Plan for Royal Recognition located at S83 W19105 Saturn Drive (Tax Key No. 2228.999.008). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the approval is subject to the petitioner’s receiving a successful wetland fill permit from the WDNR before building permits can be released. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That once this new building has occupancy, no outdoor storage or display of any type is allowed on site, without specific Plan Commission approvals. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Any changes to signage, lighting, or landscaping will require City approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the permit for this project is subject to Fire Department review. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of said plans be kept on file and that all aspects of this plan shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise authorized by the Plan Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Denied: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary City of Muskego Plan Commission Supplement PC 043-2013 For the meeting of: September 3, 2013 REQUEST: Conditional Use Grant and Building Site and Operation Plan for Dan Hewitt Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2195.999 SW ¼ of Section 9 PETITIONER: David Koscielniak of Kozitecture & Rick Burback of Burback Builders INTRODUCED: September 3, 2013 LAST AGENDA: N/A PREPARED BY: Jeff Muenkel, AICP BACKGROUND PC 043-2013 David Koscielniak of Kozitecture and Burback Builders have submitted plans for the DJs Pub & Grill property to construct a new 3,500 square foot restaurant with one unit of residential on the second floor. A residential unit within a commercial structure requires a conditional use grant and public hearing as per the DR-1 zoning district. PLAN CONSISTENCY PC 043-2013 Comprehensive Plan: The 2020 Plan depicts the areas for residential use but Council Ord. #1361 was passed allowing commercial uses to be present . The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Zoning: The property is currently RL-3 Lakeshore Residential but Council Ord. #1361 was passed allowing the DR-1 Downtown Revival Zoning District to be allowed. The structures conform to the bulk dimension requirements of the DR-1 District and the restrictions approved in Council Ord. #1361. Park and Open Space Plan: No acquisitions are proposed in this area. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Conservation Plan: No acquisition or management priorities are depicted in this area. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Street System Plan: Janesville Road required frontage is dependent on what Waukesha County needs to acquire as part of the Janesville Road reconstruction of Phase II in 2013. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Adopted 208 Sanitary Sewer Service Area: Public sanitary sewer serves the property. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Water Capacity Assessment District: The property is served by public water service. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Stormwater Management Plan: Stormwater management is not required as long as less than a ½ acre of impervious surface are added which is the case in this new proposal. Redevelopment District #2 The property lies within Redevelopment District #2. The RD #2 Plan identifies this parcel specifically and supported the rezoning to DR-1 dependent on a BSO approval of the Planning Commission. The RD #2 Plan goes on to say that redeveloping this site “may be appropriate to keep commerce along this area of Janesville Road and to enhance this gateway to the downtown of Muskego.” The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Community Development Authority members were given the PC supplement and made known of the PC meeting tonight. Members were instructed to get staff any comments relating to the RD #2 Plan before the PC meeting for staff to share OR to come and speak at the PC meeting should they see fit. DISCUSSION PC 043-2013 The full submittal is included in the supplement consisting of a narrative, site plan, grading plan, building elevations/floor plans, colored rendering, landscape plans, and lighting details. As stated above, the petitioner requests approvals to construct a new 3,520 square foot restaurant/bar with an attached residential unit along Janesville Road just north of the Pioneer Drive intersection. Zoning & 2020 Comp Plan As noted above the Council passed Ord #1361 which allows the property to be zoned DR-1 and be considered commercial in the 2020 Comp Plan. The Ordinance is subject to the commercial uses on the property being situated in the front 360 feet of the property and that only up to four residential units are found on the property. Lastly, the Ordinance is subject to Plan Commission approval of a BSO. The submittal meets the requirements of Ordinance #1361 and only one residential unit is now proposed. CUG A conditional use grant (CUG) is required for this submittal when a residential use is proposed to be allowed within a commercial structure within the Downtown Revival Zoning District. A CUG hearing is being heard before the Planning Commission tonight for this specific issue. The Planning Commission shall base their CUG determination on general considerations as to the effect of such grant on the health, general welfare, safety and economic prosperity of the City and specifically of the immediate neighborhood in which such use would be located, including such considerations as the effect on the established character and quality of the area, its physical attractiveness, the movement of traffic, the demand for related services, the possible hazardous, harmful, noxious, offensive or nuisance effect as a result of noise, dust, smoke or odor and such other factors as would be appropriate to carrying out the intent of conditional grants. Staff doesn’t see any issues with the residential use being proposed in the same commercial structure here. The downtown DR-1 zoning district promotes mixed uses and the BSO tonight associates the necessary access and parking for the proposed residential unit. The owner has stated that they intend to have the residential unit for the owner or employee of the business but this is not a requirement of the resolution given the downtown location. A use similar to this that has been ongoing for decades is the five residential units found above Muskego Liquor down the street. Site Plan The current site is vacant and the new site plan shows a new restaurant/bar, with one unit of residential on the second floor, structure up towards Janesville Road along the southeast corner of the property. The site is approximately 1.44 acres and around 110 feet in width. Access Vehicular access around the site plan meets code as two-way drive aisles are at least 24 feet in width. The Planning Commission previously required full two lane drive aisles on the previous approval and this is shown in the current proposal. Access to the site is to stem from one location along Janesville Road along the southwest corner of the site. Parking codes state that all commercial vehicular access ways and parking stalls should be at least 10 feet from an adjoining residential use. The site plan shows the commercial parking lot to be 5.5 feet from the west property line and 7 feet from the east property line. Screening of the lot is discussed in more detail below as well as reduced side offsets for the parking lot. Parking Lot Parking for the restaurant and residential structure is shown as a total of 63 stalls which is more than code requires for the proposed residential and restaurant/bar uses on the lot. The amount of parking stalls required per code in a restaurant use is 2 parking stalls per 100 square feet of customer floor area (CFA) and in the proposed structure the calculations show that there is approximately 2,130 square feet of CFA requiring 43 parking stalls. The amount of parking stalls required per code for a single-family attached residential structure is 1.5 stalls. The parking stalls are shown at a size of 9’x18’ and code requires stalls to be 10’x20’. The resolution is worded to mandate the 10’x20’ stalls by building permit time. In order to ac complish this, the side offsets of the parking lot will have to be reduced from the proposed 5.5’ on the west and the 7’ on the east. Plan Commission can allow this waiver. The resolution is worded that the Planning Commission can allow the parking lots to be closer than 10 feet to side residential property lines by code in unique situations and that the Planning Commission finds that the erection of the fences and landscaping are adequate borders, thus the Planning Commission will allow the parking lot and access lanes to be as close as 3.5 feet from the east and west property lines. Commercial Screening Any off street commercial parking area requires screening from an abutting residential use per code. The code states that a planting screen, landscaped fence, or wall at least 4 feet in height is required subject to Planning Commission approvals. The submittal includes details showing that a new 6-foot high board on board cedar fencing is to be installed along the east and west property lines. Further, landscaping will also be applied around the fencing as well. While the fencing and landscaping provide a great buffer the resolution is worded by staff that the proposed 6-foot high board on board cedar fencing along the west property line should start another 20 feet south of the proposed location and end another 40 feet north of the proposed location to better screen the parking lot from existing and future residential uses. Architecture The bar/restaurant/single residential unit structure proposed is a two-story structure with a basement. The first floor would consist of approximately 3,500 SF of restaurant/bar space with an additional approximate 400 SF seasonal deck out along Janesville Road. The residential unit would be accessed from the rear with its own entrance/exit and would consist of approximately 1,716 SF. The restaurant is to be built right up along Janesville Road, within 10 feet from the front property line, which is allowed and encouraged in the DR-1 zoning district. The details of the interior floor plans are enclosed in the supplement. The building materials for the proposed structure consist of ledge stone pattern manufactured stone veneer, Smart Side and fiber cement siding/trim/soffits/fascia, aluminum glazed doors, aluminum glazed framed windows with insulated glass, and dimensional shingles for the roof. The building is to be presented along the frontage of Janesville Road and will have an end cap vestibule on the southwest corner of the building to pronounce the restaurant. An outdoor seating deck along Janesville Road will have an ornamental fencing system around it as well. The colors proposed for the structure are earth tones. This area of the City is governed by the General Design Guide. The General Design Guide calls for 50 % masonry product. The structure proposed is comprised of 29.1% masonry architecture in total with the following percentages on each side: front (south)-40.2%, rear (north)-15.5%, side 1(east)-20.8%, & side 2(west)-44.2%. The past approved structure Plan Commission approved met the 50% masonry requirement and staff has the resolution worded that this structure must also meet the requirement per the following on the three main facades: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That 50% masonry must be found on the north, south, and west facades of the structure to meet the General Design Guide requirements and that the east façade may be at 30% due to the less visibility that is found here. Per the narrative, the building keeps with the new zoning of the DR-1 Downtown Revival District, as the building seeks to embrace the design standards promoted by the City of Muskego by: placing the building closer to the street; creating a pedestrian scale; traditional materials; variable roof lines with a sense of identity. Fire Department Approval The site plan is still subject to Fire Department approvals at the time of building permits as well. Possible changes to the site plan may be required based upon the final Fire Department review for formal fire streets however the site plan does seem to depict appropriate fire access at this time. Dumpsters/Refuse Containers/Outdoor Storage A dumpster enclosure is proposed along the west lot of the property just north of the proposed restaurant structure and is to be built with similar materials of the principal structure. It should be noted that there have been concerns with area neighbors regarding noise in relation to garbage on site in the past. The resolution is worded that garbage trucks emptying the trash from the refuse enclosure shall come only between the hours of 8 am and 5 pm and that the establishment should only dump refuse that may make more noise in the refuse enclosure (ex. recycling items like glass, etc.) between the hours of 8 am to 5 pm in order to reduce the amount of noise from the dumping of refuse for the surrounding residential neighbors. No outdoor storage is allowed on the commercial site or on the back vacant portion of the property without prior PC approval. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted as part of the proposal. Review of the landscape plan is pending and the City Forester will work with the petitioner based upon any changes/additions that are needed. In all, a wealth of landscaping is proposed in the new parking lot and along the foundation of the main structure. A landscape island is not found every 10 parking stalls per code in the middle of the lot but Plan Commission can waive this requirement. Staff does have in the resolution that the dual light pole found in the middle of the parking lot must be within a curbed landscape island and that two parking stalls may be removed as part of this requirement but parking code needs will still be met. Signage No signage is part of the submittal and will be subject to future staff approvals. Wall signage and a monument sign could be allowed on the restaurant structure in the future. Lighting Three single fixture lightpoles and two dual fixture light poles are shown on the plans and the fixtures are to be zero degree cutoff fixtures. One of the dual fixture light poles is shown in the middle of the parking lot unguarded by a landscaped curbed area. The photometric plan is not part of the submittal and the resolution is contingent that a photometric plan is produced at the time of building permits that shows the lighting plan meeting zoning codes which is no more than 0.5 foot-candles at the property lines. The resolution also is worded per the following: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All lighting fixtures must be full cut-off with a zero degree tilt and the concrete bases for the pole lights cannot exceed 6 inches in height above grade. Total bollard and light may not exceed 15 feet in height per code and all concrete bases must match an earth tone color of the building upon occupancy of the structure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the photometric plan must reflect no more than 0.5 foot-candles at the property lines at the time of building permits, and Sewer, Water, Storm, Grading The development will be served by existing public sanitary sewer and water. As noted above, stormwater management is not required as long as less than a ½ acre of impervious surface is added which is the case in this new proposal. The proposal is consistent with the Plan. Other The following is also part of the Plan Commission resolution: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any additions of residential units up to the allowed four by the rezoning ordinance is subject to future Plan Commission BSO approvals. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a separate sign permit will be required before any signage (temporary or permanent) can be installed and this includes any signage on the building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Formal approvals from the Engineering Division of grading and stormwater plans will be required before the issuance of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any bollards must be painted to match the colors of the principal structure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any new handicap signs be incorporated into bored bollards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That all roof top and ground mechanicals (including HVAC devices, electrical transformers, etc.) must be screened from view and/or incorporated into the design of the site/structure (screening, etc.) and should be approved by the Community Development Department. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PC 043-2013 Approval of Resolution PC 043-2013. MUSKEGOthe City of Area of InterestI0160320 Feet Agenda Item(s) Properties Zoning Districts Right-of-Way Hydrography Supplemental MapRESOLUTION #PC 043-2013 Hewitt Janesville Road JANESVIL L E LOO M I S R D RA C I N E A V DU R H A M WOOD S COLLEG E Prepared by City of Muskego Planning Department Date: 8/23/2013 RESOLUTION #P.C. 043-2013 APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE GRANT AND BUILDING SITE AND OPERATION PLAN FOR THE DAN HEWITT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SW ¼ OF SECTION 9 (JANESVILLE ROAD / TAX KEY NO. 2195.999) WHEREAS, On August 22, 2013 plans were submitted by Kozitecture and Burback Builders for a Building, Site and Operation Plan for a new bar/restaurant that includes one unit of residential on the second story located in the SW ¼ of Section 9 (Former DJs Pub & Grill / Janesville Road / Tax Key Nos. 2195.999), and WHEREAS, Said property is currently zoned RL-3 Lakeshore Residential but Council Ord. #1361 was passed allowing the DR-1 Downtown Revival Zoning District to be allowed upon the Plan Commission approval of this BSO and said use is a permitted use within this DR-1 zoning district, and WHEREAS, The 2020 Comprehensive Plan shows this property as residential uses, but Council Ord. #1361 was passed allowing commercial uses to be present upon the Plan Commission approval of this BSO and the proposal is consistent with the plan, and WHEREAS, The property is within the boundaries of the Redevelopment District #2 Plan and the proposal is consistent with the plan, and WHEREAS, The petitioner requests approvals to construct a new 3,520 square foot bar/restaurant up along Janesville Road just north of the Pioneer Drive intersection situated on a 1.44 acre site, and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission previously approved a BSO for this site per Resolution #053-2012 back in 2012 and said BSO at that time was for a 3,500 SF bar/restaurant along Janesville Road and a four (4) unit residential structure on the north end (rear) of the property, and WHEREAS, The proposal mimics many of the approved requirements from the previous Planning Commission approval but replaces the former rear four unit residential building with just a single residential unit to be located on the second story of the proposed bar/restaurant, and WHEREAS, A residential use is allowed within a commercial structure in the Downtown Revival Zoning District subject to a Conditional Use Grant (CUG), and WHEREAS, A CUG hearing is being heard before the Planning Commission on September 3, 2013, and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission shall base their CUG determination on general considerations as to the effect of such grant on the health, general welfare, safety and economic prosperity of the City and specifically of the immediate neighborhood in which such use would be located, including such considerations as the effect on the established character and quality of the area, its physical attractiveness, the movement of traffic, the demand for related services, the possible hazardous, harmful, noxious, offensive or nuisance effect as a result of noise, dust, smoke or odor and such other factors as would be appropriate to carrying out the intent of conditional grants, and WHEREAS, This site is governed by the General Design Guide, and WHEREAS, The current site is vacant other than some remaining existing pavement from the prior commercial use that existed on the property, and WHEREAS, Per the Common Council Rezoning Ord #1361, the commercial uses on the property are to be on the front 360 feet of the property and only up to four (4) units of residential may be allowed and the submitted proposal meets these requirements, and WHEREAS, Vehicular access around the site plan meets code as two-way drive aisles are at least 24 feet in width, and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission previously required full two lane drive aisles on the previous approval and this is shown in the current proposal, and WHEREAS, Parking codes state that all commercial vehicular access ways and parking stalls should be at least 10 feet from an adjoining residential use and the site plan shows the commercial parking lot to be 5.5 feet from the west property line and 7 feet from the east property line, and WHEREAS, The amount of parking stalls required per code in a restaurant use is 2 parking stalls per 100 square feet of customer floor area (CFA) and in the proposed structure the calculations show that there is approximately 2,130 square feet of CFA requiring 43 parking stalls, and WHEREAS, The amount of parking stalls required per code for a single-family attached residential structure is 1.5 stalls, and WHEREAS, Parking for the restaurant and residential structure is shown as a total of 63 stalls which is more than code requires for the proposed residential and restaurant/bar uses on the lot, and WHEREAS, The parking stalls are shown at a size of 9’x18’ and code requires stalls to be 10’x20’, and WHEREAS, The code states that a planting screen, landscaped fence, or wall at least 4 feet in height is required subject to Planning Commission approvals for any off street commercial parking area next to an abutting residential use, and WHEREAS, The submittal includes details showing that new 6-foot high board on board cedar fencing is to be installed along the east and west property lines along the length of the entire commercial site up to the northern end of the commercial parking lot to totally screen the parking lot operations from the abutting properties, and WHEREAS, The restaurant proposed is to be built right up along Janesville Road, within 10 feet from the front property line, which is allowed and encouraged in the DR-1 zoning district, and WHEREAS, The building materials for the restaurant consist of ledge stone pattern manufactured stone veneer, Smart Side and fiber cement siding/trim/soffits/fascia, aluminum glazed doors, aluminum glazed framed windows with insulated glass, and dimensional shingles for the roof, and WHEREAS, The building is to be presented along the frontage of Janesville Road and will have one end cap vestibule on the southwest corner of the building to pronounce the restaurant as traffic is moving east on Janesville Road, and WHEREAS, The east façade will be mostly blocked by existing vegetation from the residential property to the east, and WHEREAS, An outdoor seating deck is proposed along Janesville Road that will have an ornamental fencing system around it, and WHEREAS, The colors proposed for the structure are earth tones, and WHEREAS, The residential unit proposed is shown on the second floor, has its own entrance along the rear (north) façade, and will mimic the architecture and materials proposed for the rest of the structure while including an outdoor patio area on west facade, and WHEREAS, The restaurant structure proposed is comprised of the following percentages of masonry on each side: front (south)-40.2%, rear (north)-15.5%, side 1(east)-20.8%, & side 2(west)-44.2%, and WHEREAS, The General Design Guide calls for 50% masonry product, and WHEREAS, The building keeps with the new zoning of the DR-1 Downtown Revival District, as the building seeks to embrace the design standards promoted by the City of Muskego by: placing the building closer to the street; creating a pedestrian scale; traditional materials; variable roof lines with a sense of identity, and WHEREAS, The site and building plans are subject to Fire Department approvals, and WHEREAS, A dumpster enclosure is proposed just north of the proposed restaurant structure to be built with similar materials as the principal structure, and WHEREAS, There have been concerns with area neighbors regarding noise in relation to garbage on site in the past, and WHEREAS, A landscape plan has been submitted as part of the proposal showing a wealth of landscaping in the new parking lot and along the foundations of the structure, and WHEREAS, A few updates may be required for the landscape plan and this resolution is subject to future changes desired by the City Forester, and WHEREAS, No exact signage is part of the submittal and will be subject to future staff approvals, and WHEREAS, Three single fixture lightpoles and two dual fixture light poles are shown on the plans and the fixtures are to be zero degree cutoff fixtures, and WHEREAS, One of the dual fixture light poles is shown in the middle of the parking lot unguarded by a landscaped curbed area, and WHEREAS, The photometric plan is not part of the submittal and the resolution is contingent that a photometric plan is produced at the time of building permits that shows the lighting plan meeting zoning codes which is no more than 0.5 foot-candles at the property lines, and WHEREAS, The development will be served by existing public sanitary sewer and water and stormwater will consist of sheet flow from north to south as no storm pond is now required per MNSD standards due to less amount of impervious surfaces being applied. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Plan Commission approves of the Building, Site and Operation Plan and a Conditional Use Grant for a new bar/restaurant with one (1) unit residential on the second floor located in the SW ¼ of Section 9 (Former DJs Pub & Grill / S76 W18040 Janesville Road / Tax Key No. 2195.999). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the proposed 6-foot high board on board cedar fencing found along the west property line should start another 20 feet south of the proposed location and end another 40 feet north of the proposed location to better screen the parking lot from existing and future residential uses. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission can allow the parking lots to be closer than 10 feet to side residential property lines by code in unique situations and that the Planning Commission finds that the erection of the fences and landscaping are adequate borders, thus the Planning Commission will allow the parking lot and access lanes to be as close as 3.5 feet from the east and west property lines. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That all parking stalls must be 10’x20’ per code and the allowance of reduced side yard offsets by the Planning Commission on the parking lot should allow the stalls to meet code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That 50% masonry must be found on the north, south, and west facades of the structure to meet the General Design Guide requirements and that the east façade may be at 30% due to the less visibility that is found here. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any additions of residential units up to the allowed four by the rezoning ordinance is subject to future Plan Commission BSO approvals. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, A separate sign permit will be required before any signage (temporary or permanent) can be installed and this includes any signage on the building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The site plan is still subject to Fire Department approvals at the time of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That garbage trucks emptying the trash from the refuse enclosure shall come only between the hours of 8 am and 5 pm and that the establishment should only dump refuse that may make more noise in the refuse enclosure (ex. recycling items like glass, etc.) between the hours of 8 am to 5 pm in order to reduce the amount of noise from the dumping of refuse for the surrounding residential neighbors. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, All lighting fixtures must be full cut-off with a zero degree tilt and the concrete bases for the pole lights cannot exceed 6 inches in height above grade. Total bollard and light may not exceed 15 feet in height per code and all concrete bases must match an earth tone color of the building upon occupancy of the structure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the photometric plan must reflect no more than 0.5 foot-candles at the property lines at the time of building permits, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the dual light pole found in the middle of the parking lot must be within a curbed landscape island and that two parking stalls may be removed as part of this requirement but parking c ode needs will still be met. This requirement is per code in that every 10 parking stalls should have a landscape island. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, No outdoor storage is allowed on the commercial site or on the back vacant portion of the property without prior Plan Commission approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, A final landscape plan will need to be approved by the City Forester prior to the issuance of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Formal approvals from the Engineering Division of grading and stormwater plans will be required before the issuance of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any bollards must be painted to match the colors of the principal structure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any new handicap signs be incorporated into bored bollards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That all roof top and ground mechanicals (including HVAC devices, electrical transformers, etc.) must be screened from view and/or incorporated into the design of the site/structure (screening, etc.) and should be approved by the Community Development Department. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of said plans be kept on file in the Building Department and that all aspects of this plan shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise authorized by the Plan Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That failure to comply with the approval contained in this resolution shall result in the imposition of fines of $100 per day, the initiation of legal action, or both. Plan Commission City of Muskego Adopted: Defeated: Deferred: Introduced: September 3, 2013 ATTEST: Kellie McMullen, Recording Secretary First Floor Plan Ce l l : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 0 3 - 8 4 8 9 Fa x : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 2 9 - 9 4 9 1 ww w . K o z i t e c t u r e . c o m Ce l l : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 0 3 - 8 4 8 9 Fa x : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 2 9 - 9 4 9 1 ww w . K o z i t e c t u r e . c o m Ce l l : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 0 3 - 8 4 8 9 Fa x : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 2 9 - 9 4 9 1 ww w . K o z i t e c t u r e . c o m Ce l l : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 0 3 - 8 4 8 9 Fa x : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 2 9 - 9 4 9 1 ww w . K o z i t e c t u r e . c o m Ce l l : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 0 3 - 8 4 8 9 Fa x : ( 4 1 4 ) 3 2 9 - 9 4 9 1 ww w . K o z i t e c t u r e . c o m